IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT &

SESSIONS JUDGE, SOUTH EAST DISTRICT, SAKET

COURTS, NEW DELHI

IN THE MATTER OF:

State Versus Rahul Chamola

FIR No. 293/2019
U/s 420/406/120B IPC
P.S. EOW, South East Distt.

APPLICATION U/S 439(2) CR.P.C. FOR

CANCELLATION OF BAIL OF ACCUSED
RAHUL CHAMOLA FOR NON COMPLIANCE
OF BAIL ORDER DATED 30.1.2024 PASSED
BY SHRI SACHIN SANGWAN, LD. ASJ(FTC)-
01, SOUTH EAST, SAKET COURTS, NEW
DELHI

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That during consideration of bail application of

accused Rahul Chamola it was found that the

matter of 29 complainants/victims has been

settled completely and the matter of two other

complainants/victims remains to be settled only

qua loan amount. I.O. submitted that there are

total 52 complainants/victims out of which

matter has been settled with 50

complainants/victims.
2. That the matter is stated to be not settled with

complainant/victim Inderjeet Singh as there is

some record tallying issue between parties. Qua

complainant/victim Navratan Yadav, matter has

not been settled as he wants interest on the

amount invested.

3. That the counsel for accused submitted that

accused shall deposit as per MOU executed with

other victims qua complainants/victims

Inderjeet Singh and Navratan Yadav before the

court. It is also stated that the accused shall

deposit FDRs of Rs.6 lakhs(for victim Inderjeet

Singh) and Rs.4 lakhs(for victim Navratan

Yadav) before court before bail bonds of accused

are accepted.

4. That Rahul Chamola was granted interim bail

for a period of 3 months from date of his release

on accused furnishing bail bonds in the sum of

Rs. 2 Lakhs with two sureties of the amount to

satisfaction of concerned Ld. Area MM/Duty

 MM/Link MM, vide order dated 28.6.2023

passed by Sh. Sonu Agnihotri, Ld. Vacation

Judge/ADJ-07(South East), Saket Courts, New

Delhi. True copy of the order is enclosed

herewith.

5. That the FDR of the amount of Rs.6 lakh yet to

be received by the complainant/victim Inderjeet.

6. That thereafter the interim bail of the accused

continued to be extended from time to time.

7. That the accused had offered to give alternate

property to the complainant/victim Inderjeet.

Thereafter the accused was granted regular bail

vide order dated 30.1.2024 passed by Sh.

Sachin Sangwan, Ld. ASJ(FTC)-01, South East

Distt., Saket Courts, New Delhi. The true copy

of the order is enclosed herewith.

8. That since then more than 1½ months have

passed, neither the alternate property has been

given to the complainant/victim Inderjeet nor

the amount of Rs.56 lakhs has been paid. On

 the contrary the accused is neither available in

his office nor picking up the phone call of the

complainant/victim Inderjeet.

9. That from the above it is evident that the

accused has not complied with the terms and

conditions of bail order, hence the bail of

accused Rahul Chamola deserves to be

cancelled.

PRAYER:

It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that for

disobeying the order of the Hon’ble Court and

harassing the applicant/complainant/victim the

regular bail of accused Rahul Chamola may kindly be

cancelled, in the interest of justice.

New Delhi Complainant/victim

Dated .3.2024 (Inderjeet)

Through

Counsel