The passages on focuses on Rembrandt, who is the a famous painter in of the 17th century and

question whether their paints “Portrait an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet” belongs to him.

First of all, explaining for this argument, the article mentions a problem with the way the woman’s
woman is dressed. It mentions the woman’s dress is made by out of luxury stuffs, which and this is
not related to paintthe artwork. On the other hand,, and this is not Rembrandt’s style. In addition,
the lecturer supports the idea in the article. She mentions aboutadds that the dress that it wasn’t
was not original. Because she explains the pigments seems like it had been changed by someone
else.

Secondly, the article mentions argues that his name was master of shadows and light. However, the
portrait doesn’t does not incluede this these things together. Especially, the face has to some
mistakes about these dark/light concepts. Also, the lecturer focuses on the same points. She
mentionssupports these claims by adding that if it had original paint, it could be possible to see at
white color on the woman’s face easily. In addition, it had it been the original, it would have seen
seem very more realistic.

Lastly, the passage mentions several pieces of wood glues together, which were uses used for mades
making the painting. But Rembrandt usually used wood panels and there is no other example
samples that on which he used various woods. The lecturer supports this argument, too. She
mentions it about incluedes this matterseveral pieces of different woods. And she says
aboutemphasizes that everyone knowsit was common knowledge that he uses used wood panels
and for this, his panels are more valuable. In additon, there wasn’t any no proof from the research
that Rembrant uses used other wood types.