Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
The Probate and Administration of Estates Act, Cap 352 defines an Administrator or
administratrix in case it is a female, to be a person appointed by the court to administer the
estate of a deceased person when there is no executor or no executor is able and willing to
act, but the same law defines an Executor to be a person to whom the execution of the last
will of a deceased person is, by the testator’s (a person who prepares and signs a Will)
appointment, confided. Therefore, the administrator of the estate is appointed by Court when
there is no Will or there is a Will which has not appointed an executor.
The administrator or executor as the case may be, is given mandate to collect, administer,
distribute and dispose the estate on behalf of and for the benefit of the heirs.
A person who buys in good faith a property within an estate of a deceased being sold by an
administrator with valid letters of administration or the executor of a valid will as the case
may be, is referred to as the bonafide purchaser. The term “Bonafide” means “Without
intention to deceive”. The bonafide purchaser is accorded protection under the law for all
purchases made in good faith without notice of any encumbrance on the estate. In this
article, the Litigation team of Breakthrough Attorneys highlights the legal framework
governing protection of bonafide purchasers of probated properties in Tanzania
1/4
The provisions of Section 101 of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act Cap 352
R.E. 2002 provides for power of sale of the estate the administrator or executor of the estate.
The provision states:
It is apparent from the above provision that the administrator may sell the property of the
deceased. In addition, the administrator may mortgage or lease the property as he/she
deems fit. This principle was enunciated by the High Court in the case of Mohamed Hassani
Vs Mayasa Mzee and Mwanahawa Mzee [1994] TTLR 225. In this case the Court ruled
inter alia,
“upon grant of letters of administration the grantee therof becomes fully mandated to deal
with the estate the best way he can and especially does not need consent of eachof the heirs
to dispose property of which are under his custody at all the time of administration”.
There are instances where the administrator’s appointment is revoked after sale of the
property to the bonafide purchaser. In that case, the bonafide purchaser of the property
transferred to him by administrator or executor before nullification of the appointment is
protected under the law. Breakthrough Attorneys’ lawyers were part of the team which
successfully appealed to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania in MIRE ARTAN ISMAIL and
ZAINABU MZEE vs. SOFIA NJATI, Civil Appeal No. 75 of 2008 (unreported) in which the
Court overruled nullification of sale of the property and upheld the protection of the bonafide
purchaser. The Court reasoned inter alia that;
“The 4 heirs of Yusuf Mzee, per page 18 of the record of appeal, consented to the sale of
house No. 29 on Plot No. 4 Block 61 Livingstone Street, Kariakoo, Dar es Salaam. Under the
circumstances, the administratrix lawfully sold the house in dispute to the 1st appellant, Mire
Artan Ismail. The latter was a bona fide purchaser for value without encumbrances. The
proceeds of sale were distributed to the beneficiaries of the late Yusuf Mzee as shown on
Pages 99 to 102 of the record of appeal. The property was properly transferred to the
purchaser as shown on Page 103 of the record of appeal.”
In its decision, the Court of Appeal [Supra] was persuaded by the Halsbury’s Laws of
England Vol.17 (2) 4th Edition Reissue Paragraph 446, Butterworths which states;
2/4
“All conveyances of any interest in real and personal estate made to a purchaser by a person
to whom probate or letters of administration have been granted are valid notwithstanding any
subsequent revocation, or variation of the probate or letters of administration.”
It is now settled principle in our jurisdiction, as per the decision of the Court of Appeal cited
above that subsequent revocation of letters of administration does not invalidate prior sale of
the property to a bonafide purchaser. In that premise therefore, the law in our jurisdiction
protects bonafide purchaser for value who purchased the property in good faith and without
any notice of encumbrance. In case of landed properties dispositions, this position is further
fortified by the provisions of Section 67 (b) (i) of the Land Act, 1999 which somewhat
protects the purchaser who is unaware of such defects in title at the time of sale if such
purchaser has done his/her homework on other reasonably foreseeable defects.
3. Conclusion
The paramount duty of the administrator and/or executor of the estate is to abide to the
powers entrusted to him by the law. The law requires good faith on the part of the
administrator and executor in dealing with the estate of the deceased. Furthermore, the law
empowers the administrator to sale, mortgage and lease the property of the decease for the
interests of the beneficiaries. In the event one purchases the property from the administrator
and subsequently the appointment of the administrator is revoked; the law afford protection
to the bonafide purchaser. The protection is based on the fact that the bonafide purchaser
was unaware of the defects at the time of sale. In essence such defects were non-existent at
the time of sale and that the purchaser acted in ultimate good faith; hence the bonafide
purchaser cannot be condemned of such encumbrances.
Important notice
3/4
This publication has been prepared for information only, and it does not constitute
professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication
without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or
implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this
publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, Breakthrough Attorneys, its members,
employees and agents do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for
any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the
information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it
4/4