DESIGN REPORT

9-STORIED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

PLOT NO-08, ROAD-505, SECTOR-11, JOLSHIRI ABASHAN
NARAYANGANJ, BANGLADESH

STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT
RABINDRA NATH SARKER (P. Eng)
MIEB-26095, DMINB/CE-0237, DCB E220
CEO, DEC DESIGN ENGINEERING & CONSULTATION
FLAT NO 7/A, DILARA TOWER, 77 BIR UTTAM C.R DATTA
ROAD, HATIRPOOL, DHAKA-1205
PHONE # 01716446326

1|Page
CONTENT

1. INTRODUCTION
2. ARCHITECTURAL DRWAING
3. SUMMARY OF DESIGN
4. MATERIALS USED FOR STRENGTH
5. DESIGN CALCULATIONS
1. FOUNDATION
2. COLUMN
3. BEAM
4. SLAB
6. CONCLUSION

2|Page
 1. INTRODUCTION
The proposed 9 storied residential building named Assort Ameena Park
View for MD. REAZ HASAN at plot no - 08, road no - 505, sector - 11
Jolshiri, abashan Narayanganj, have 2680 sft per floor area with 62.92 sft
length and 41.83 sft width.

All columns are connected with RC beam or slab in both directions.

Ground floor is structurally 10.0 ft (from grade beam to mezzanine floor)
and other are 10 ft high each. There is one stair case in the building. The
ground floor is used for car parking, EME room and guard room. There is
a mezzanine floor. The 1st to 8th floor shall be used for residential purposes.
Roof floor is used for open roof. In the roof, there is one lift machine room
and overhead water tank.

3|Page
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING

Figure: Ground Floor Plan

4|Page
 .

Figure: Mezzanine Floor Plan

5|Page
 Figure: Typical Floor Plan

6|Page
 Figure: Roof Plan

7|Page
 3. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS FOR DESIGN
The Design of the Foundation has been prepared according to Sub-Soil
investigation Report and considering the BNBC 2020 load calculation
method.

All Sub-Structural and super-structural elements are designed with

sufficient strength for the building to ensure safe withstand of all the
superimposed Dead and Live loads combined with anticipated lateral loads
(Wind and Earthquake) possibly to be experienced by the Structure in its
Service life according to the guidance of BNBC 2020. The building has
been analyzed by ETABS software following BNBC 2020.

3.1 Load Applied on the Building for Analysis

A. Seismic Load:
Zone coefficient Z = 0.20 for Zone-2 (BNBC Table 6.2.15)
For occupancy category I, Importance factor I =1.0 (BNBC Table 6.2.17)
Response modification factor R= 5.5 (BNBC Table 6.2.19)
Soil factor S= 1.35 for soil type SD (BNBC Table 6.2.16)
Seismic design category = IMRF (Intermediate Moment Frame) (BNBC
Table 6.2.18)
The building period T according to Eqn. 6.2.38 is 1.21

8|Page
9|Page
10 | P a g e
 Figure: Seismic Zone

Figure: Seismic Design Category

Figure: BNBC Table 6.2.19

11 | P a g e
 Figure: Time Period

12 | P a g e
 Figure: Seismic Design Parameter(Appendix C)

13 | P a g e
 Figure: Seismic Load pattern(X- Direction)

Figure: Seismic Load pattern (Y- Direction)

14 | P a g e
 B. Wind Load:
Wind load coefficient and parameters has been applied in Etabs software
following BNBC 2020.
Basic Wind Speed =61.1 m/s=138mile/hr for Dhaka as per BNBC 2020
Table 6.2.8,
Exposure category for this buildings Exposure B as per Sec 2.4.6.2 and
2.4.6.3
Importance factor I=1.0 as per Table 6.2.9

Figure: Wind Load Pattern (X- Direction)

15 | P a g e
 Figure: Wind Load Pattern (Y- Direction)

16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
 Figure: Basic Wind Speed
C. Dead Load:
Self-weight for Slab thickness 5”, 7” and 8” only for Roof Slab
Super Dead Load 110 psf (i.e. floor finish load, wall load etc.)
Super Dead load for O.H.W.R Bottom slab is 350psf as 5ft water load
Super Dead load for lift Machine Bottom slab is 100 psf, Stair super dead
load is 60 psf

Figure: Typical Super Dead Load applied on Etabs (1st

to Roof)

18 | P a g e
 D. Live Load:
1st floor to 8th floor live load 42 psf
Roof floor live load for Green zone is 100 psf
Lift machine room Bottom slab live load is 100 psf, Stair live load is 100
psf

Figure: Typical Live Load applied on Etabs (1st to 8th)

19 | P a g e
 Figure: Roof Live Load applied on Etabs Model

20 | P a g e
 3.2 The Principle load combination as per BNBC
2020
Load Load
Combinat Combinat
ions ions

Combo-01 1.29(D+SD)+1Ex+1L Combo-17 0.81(D+SD)+1Ex+0.3Ey

Combo-02 1.29(D+SD)-1Ex+1L Combo-18 0.81(D+SD)+1Ex-0.3Ey

Combo-03 1.29(D+SD)+1Ey+1L Combo-19 0.81(D+SD)-1Ex+0.3Ey

Combo-04 1.29(D+SD)-1Ey+1L Combo-20 0.81(D+SD)-1Ex-0.3Ey

Combo-05 0.81(D+SD)+1Ex Combo-21 0.81(D+SD)+0.3Ex+1Ey

Combo-06 0.81(D+SD)-1Ex Combo-22 0.81(D+SD)+0.3Ex-1Ey

Combo-07 0.81(D+SD)+1Ey Combo-23 0.81(D+SD)-0.3Ex+1Ey

Combo-08 0.81(D+SD)-1Ey Combo-24 0.81(D+SD)-0.3Ex-1Ey

Combo-09 1.29(D+SD)+1Ex+0.3Ey+1L Combo-25 1.4(D+SD)

Combo-10 1.29(D+SD)+1Ex-0.3Ey+1L Combo-26 1.2(D+SD)+1.6L+0.5LR

Combo-11 1.29(D+SD)-1Ex+0.3Ey+1L Combo-27 1.2(D+SD)+1.6LR+0.8W

Combo-12 1.29(D+SD)-1Ex-0.3Ey+1L Combo-28 1.2(D+SD)+1.6W+1L+0.5LR

Combo-13 1.29(D+SD)+0.3Ex+1Ey+1L Combo-29 1.2(D+SD)+1.6LR+1L

1.29(D+SD)-
Combo-14 Combo-30 0.9(D+SD)+1.6W
0.3Ex+1Ey+1L

21 | P a g e
 1.29(D+SD)+0.3Ex- D=Dead Load, SD=Super Dead,
Combo-15
1Ey+1L L=Live,
LR=Roof Live
1.29(D+SD)-0.3Ex-
Combo-16 E=Seismic Load(X,Y direction),
1Ey+1L
W=Wind Load

3.3 Method of Analysis and Loading Input in

software:
The linear static model based analysis by Etabs software has been
performed for the building. The support reaction, axial load, bending
moment, shear force, deflection result has been taken from the software.
The column required rebar has been taken from the Etabs software.

4. MATERIALS USED FOR STRENGTH

4.1 Materials used in Building:

SL No Items Locations

Concrete mixed up with stone chips,

1 In foundation and column
coarse sand and cement

Concrete mixed up with stone chips,

2 In floor beam and slab
coarse sand and cement

3 Steel Rebar(Deformed) In all RC members

Exterior side and Exterior

4 Glass
window

22 | P a g e
 10” Brick wall Stair wall
5
5” Brick wall Exterior Wall, Toilet wall

4.2 Materials Strength Considered for Design

Report:
Concrete strength f’c for foundation =4000 psi
Concrete strength f’c for column, beam =4000 psi
Concrete strength f’c for others =3500 psi
All Reinforcement are 72.5 Grade high strength yield strength of steel f =
500 Mpa (72500 psi)

5. DESIGN CALCULATIONS
The method of structural design is USD method for the RCC building.
Foundation has been checked by working load and allowable soil bearing
capacity.
The punching stress and bending moment capacity of footing has been
checked by USD method. The column, beams and slab has been checked
by USD method.

5.1 Foundation Check: All are the pile foundations

23 | P a g e
 Figure: Pile Layout Plan

24 | P a g e
 Figure: Pile Details

As per soil test report, for this project, cast-in -situ pile diameter is 24”
(600mm) and the length of pile is 31 meter. Allowable Design capacity is
260 kip.

25 | P a g e
 Figure: Base Reactions for ENVW

26 | P a g e
 Figure: Base Reactions for W2

27 | P a g e
 5.1.2 Foundation Calculations

Provided per
Req. per
Pile Cap Load (Kip) pile Remar
Grid Pile
Name (SERVICE) capacity(kip) (FOS
Capacity
FOS=2.5
2-A,B 6P1 879 131 260 4.96
3,-A,B 6P1 789 246 260 2.64
2-D,E 6P1 937 128 260 5.08
3-D,E 6P1 751 253 260 2.57
5-C,B,D 6P2 1362 254 260 2.56
1-A,B 5P1 507 245 260 2.65
1-C,D,E 5P3 540 246 260 2.64
4-E 3P1 485 200 260 3.25
4-B 3P2 481 236.5 260 2.75
4-A 2P1 365 169 260 3.85

28 | P a g e
 5-A 2P1 269 163 260 3.99
5-B 2P1 449 217.5 260 2.99
5-E 2P1 276 163 260 3.99

All pile are adequate as per soil bearing capacity, punching strength and
bending moment capacity.

Figure: 2P1 Section

Pile Cap PC-2 Check:
Provided Thickness =40”
Column face to pile outer distance =15”

29 | P a g e
 Ultimate load per pile, Pu =240x1.4=336kip
Ultimate moment, Mu=336x15/12”=420 kip-ft

Rn=Mu/0.9bd2=138 psi, ρ=0.00238

As=.00238x12x41 in2/ft = 1.17 in2/ft, As Min. (200/fy = 0.00333) 1.64
in2/ft
Provided ϕ25@4” c/c (2.37 in2/ft >1.64 in2/ft, Okay

Figure: 3P1 Section

Pile Cap PC-3 Check:

30 | P a g e
 Provided Thickness =30”
Column face to pile outer distance =26”
Ultimate load per pile, Pu =240x1.4x2=672kip
Ultimate moment, Mu=672x26/12”=1456 kip-ft = 2500 kip-in/ft

Rn=Mu/0.9bd2=82.4 psi, ρ=0.0014

As=.0014x12x53 in2/ft = 0.90 in2/ft, As Min.( 200/fy = 0.00333) 2.11 in2/ft
Provided ϕ25@4” c/c (2.37 in2/ft >2.11 in2/ft), Okay

Figure: 4P2 Section

Pile Cap PC-4 Check:

Provided Thickness =38”

31 | P a g e
 Column face to pile outer distance =26”
Ultimate load per pile, Pu =240x1.4x2=672kip
Ultimate moment, Mu=672x26/12”=1456 kip-ft = 2500 kip-in/ft

Rn=Mu/0.9bd2=82.4 psi, ρ=0.0014

As=.0014x12x53 in2/ft = 0.90 in2/ft , As Min.( 200/fy = 0.00333) 2.11 in2/ft
Provided ϕ25@4” c/c (2.37 in2/ft >2.11 in2/ft), Oka

5.2 Column Check:

All are RCC column. All columns are connected with floor beams in both
directions.

32 | P a g e
 Figure: Column Layout Plan

33 | P a g e
34 | P a g e
35 | P a g e
 Figure: Column Schedule

Figure: Shear Wall Schedule

36 | P a g e
5.2.1 Column Adequate by Check:

37 | P a g e
 Figure: Column Reinforcement (Full Structure)

38 | P a g e
 Figure: Column Reinforcement (Grid B)

39 | P a g e
 Figure: Column Reinforcement (Grid E)
40 | P a g e
41 | P a g e
 Figure: Column Reinforcement (Grid G)

42 | P a g e
 Figure: Column Reinforcement (Grid H)

43 | P a g e
 Figure: Shear wall Reinforcement (Grid 4)

44 | P a g e
 Figure: Shear wall Reinforcement (Grid F)

45 | P a g e
 COLUMN FLOOR REQUIRED PROVIDED
GRID REMARK
SIZE NAME REBAR REBAR
1A C1(15X25) Ground 5.48 6.73 Adequate
1E C1(15X25) Ground 5.48 6.73 Adequate
1B C2(15X30) Ground 8.06 10.5 Adequate
1D C2(15X30) Ground 8.06 10.5 Adequate
2B C3(15X30) Ground 10.49 11.4 Adequate
2D C3(15X30) Ground 10.49 11.4 Adequate
2E C3(15X30) Ground 10.49 11.4 Adequate
3A C4(15X30) Ground 13.23 14.22 Adequate
3B C4(15X30) Ground 13.23 14.22 Adequate
3E C5(15X30) Ground 12.41 12.64 Adequate
3A C6(12X30) Ground 12.95 14.22 Adequate
4A C7(12X30) Ground 8.94 9.2 Adequate
4D C8(12X30) Ground 10.23 11.06 Adequate
4E C8(12X30) Ground 10.23 11.06 Adequate
5E C9(12X30) Ground 7.95 9.82 Adequate
5A C9(12X30) Ground 7.95 9.82 Adequate
5B C10(12X25) Ground 10.26 11.06 Adequate
5E C10(12X25) Ground 10.26 11.06 Adequate

GRID SHEAR FLOOR REQUIRE PROVIDE REMARK

WALL SIZE NAME D REBAR D REBAR
3D SW1(15X35) Ground 11.7 13.94 Adequat

46 | P a g e
 5C SW2(10X81) Ground 26.9 28.4 Adequat

All columns and shear wall are adequate.

5.2 Beam Check:

5.2.1 Grade Beam
The size of grade beam is 12”x24” The rebar quantity is adequate and is
greater than the required rebar quantity.

Figure: Grade Beam Layout

47 | P a g e
 Figure: Reinforcement of Grade Beam (Etabs)

48 | P a g e
 5.2.2 Floor Beam

Figure: Typical Beam Section

The size of the floor beam is 10”x24”, 12”x24”. The rebar quantity is
adequate and is greater than the required rebar quantity.

49 | P a g e
 Figure: Mezzanine Floor Beam Layout

50 | P a g e
 Figure: 1st Floor Beam Layout

51 | P a g e
 Figure: Typical Beam Layout

52 | P a g e
53 | P a g e
 Figure: Reinforcement of Mezzanine Floor Beam

Figure: Reinforcement of Typical Floor Beam

54 | P a g e
 Figure: Reinforcement of Roof Floor Beam
Therefore all the floor beam are adequate.
5.3 Slab Check:

55 | P a g e
 Figure: Mezzanine Floor Slab Top Reinforcement

56 | P a g e
 Figure: Mezzanine Floor Slab Bottom Reinforcement

57 | P a g e
 Figure: Typical Floor Slab Bottom Reinforcement

58 | P a g e
 Figure: Typical Floor Slab Top Reinforcement

59 | P a g e
 Figure: Typical Floor Slab Bending Moment for X-direction.

60 | P a g e
 Figure: Typical Floor Slab Bending Moment for Y-direction.
5.3.1 Slab Thickness Check:
Required
Provided
Thickness(According to Remarks
Thickness
Panel Size)
5” 6” Adequate
5” 6” Adequate
5” 6” Adequate

All the slab thickness and reinforcement is adequate.

6. CONCLUSION

61 | P a g e
 Therefore it can be declared that all the foundations, all the columns,
grade beam, all floor beam and slab of the proposed 9-storeid building
shall be fully structurally adequate as per BNBC 2020.

62 | P a g e