Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AND THEIR
A PPLIC4 TIONS
FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
EDITORIAL BOARD
Food Emulsions: Third Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited by Stig E. Friberg and
Kdre Larsson
Srinivasan Damodaran
Universify of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison, Wisconsin
Alain Paraf
lnstitut National de la Recherche Agronornique
Centre de Recherches de Tours
Nouzilly, France
m
MARCEL
MARCEL
DEKKER,
INC.
D E K K E R
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication.Data
The publisher offers discounts on this book when ordered in bulk quantities. For more information. write to
Special Sales/Professional Marketing at the address below.
Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information storage and
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Proteins are highly complex biopolymers. In biological systems, proteins perform various
functions, serving as biocatalysts, structural elements of cells (cytoskeletons), mechanical
devices (muscles), messengers (hormones), taxis (transport proteins), metal scrapers (che-
lators), soldiers (antibodies), and protectors (toxins). This functional diversity, which
requires the ability to assume various spatial structural forms, is attributable mainly to
their intricate chemical makeup.
Proteins are one of the main constituents of foods. They perform several critical
functions in food systems that contribute to the sensorial properties of foods. Typical
functions of proteins in food systems include thickening, gelation, emulsification, foam-
ing, texturization, water binding, adhesion and cohesion, and lipid and flavor binding
and retention. These functional properties of proteins in food systems are also very much
influenced by their structural states in foods. One of the oldest, most cherished wishes
of food protein chemists is to develop a fundamental understanding of the structure-
function relationships of food proteins, so that the functionality and uses of underutilized
plant proteins can be enhanced through physical, chemical, enzymatic, and genetic mod-
ifications. Much progress has been made in the past decade. The goal of this book is to
provide up-to-date information on the developments in this important area of food
research.
This book is intended primarily as a textbook for graduate students and a reference
book for food scientists in academia and industry. The chapters are grouped into three
parts. Chapters 1-6 describe fundamental physicochemical aspects of protein structure,
denaturation, protein-stabilized foams and emulsion, gels, protein-polysaccharide inter-
actions, and protein-lipid interactions. Chapters 7-12 provide an in-depth analysis of
structure-function relationships of major food proteins, such as caseins, whey proteins,
soy proteins, wheat proteins, egg proteins, and muscle proteins. Chapters 13-17 discuss
chemical, genetic, enzymatic, and physical modification methods to improve the func-
tional properties of proteins. Chapter 18 describes the unique film-forming properties of
proteins, and Chapters 19-22 analyze processing-induced changes in nutritional value
of proteins and various extraction and analytical procedures, including immunological
methods, used in protein isolation and characterization. Thus, we have attempted to cover
a wide spectrum of topics, both fundamental and applied. Although care has been taken
to minimize duplication, some inadvertent overlap between chapters is inevitable.
iv Preface
Srinivasan Damodaran
Alain Paraf
Contents
...
Preface 111
Contributors vii
Index 665
Contributors
Carl A. Batt Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
C. Y. Boquien Centre International de Recherches Daniel Carasso, Le Plessis-Robin-
son, France
J. I. Boye Food Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Ralph W. Burley CSIRO Division of Food Science Technology, North Ryde, New
South Wales, Australia
Philippe Cayot DCpartement de Biochimie, Physico-chimie et ProperiCtCs Sensorielles
de ]'Aliment, ENSBANA, Universitt de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
Jean-Marc Chobert LEIMA, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Nantes,
France
Douglas G. Dalgleish Department of Food Science, University of Guelph, Guelph,
Ontario, Canada
Srinivasan Damodaran Department of Food Science, University of Wiscon-
sin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
Etsushiro Doit Research Institute for Food Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
P. A. Finot Nestec Ltd. Research Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland
Thomas HaertlC LEIMA, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Nantes,
France
V. R. Harwalkar Food Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada
K. Heremans Department of Chemistry, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
A. Huyghebaert Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Ghent,
Ghent, Belgium
viii Contributors
Naofumi Kitabatake Research Institute for Food Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto,
Japan
John M. Krochta Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Cali-
fornia, Davis, California
D. Lafiandra University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
Denis Lorient DCpartement de Biochimie, Physico-chimie et PropriCtCs Sensorielles
de ]'Aliment, ENSBANA, UniversitC de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
C.-Y. Ma Food Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
E MacRitchie CSIRO Plant Industry, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
Yasuki Matsumura Research Institute for Food Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto,
Japan
J. L. Maubois Laboratoire de Recherches de Technologie Laiti'ere, Institut National de
la Recherche Agronomique, Rennes, France
Tomohiko Mori Research Institute for Food Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
P. K. Nandi Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre de Recherches de
Tours, Nouzilly, France
Per Munk Nielsen Novo Nordisk AIS, Bagsvaerd, Denmark
David Oakenfull CSIRO Division of Food Science and Technology, North Ryde, New
South Wales, Australia
G. Ollivier Laboratoire de Recherches de Technologie Laitigre, Institut National de la
Recherche Agronomique, Rennes, France
Paul Paquin FacultC des Sciences de I'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation, UniversitC
Laval, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada
Alain Paraf Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre de Recherches de
Tours, Nouzilly, France
John Pearce CSIRO Division of Food Science and Technology, North Ryde, New
South Wales, Australia
Christian Sanchez Laboratoire de Physico-chimie et Genie Alimentiares, ENSRIA-
INPL, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
Klaus D. Schwenke Plant Protein Chemistry Research Group, Universitat Potsdam,
Bergholz-Rehbriicke, Germany
Vladimir B. Tolstoguzov Department of Food Science, Nestec Ltd. Research Center,
Lausanne, Switzerland
Shigeru Utsumi Research Institute for Food Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
J. Van Camp Department of Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Ghent,
Ghent, Belgium
Youling L. Xiong Food Science Section, Department of Animal Sciences, University
of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
Food Proteins: An Overview
SRINIVASANDAMODARAN
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison, Wisconsin
I. INTRODUCTION
Proteins play several important roles in biological and food systems. Some of these
include biocatalysts (enzymes), structural components of cells and organs (e.g., collagen,
keratin, elastin, etc.), contractile proteins (actin, myosin, tubulin), hormones (insulin,
growth factor, etc.), transport proteins (serum albumin, transfemn, hemoglobin), metal
chelation (phosvitin, femtin), antibodies (immunoglobulins), protective proteins (toxins
and allergens), and storage proteins (seed proteins, casein micelles, egg albumen) as
nitrogen and energy source for embryos.
Proteins are highly complex polymers, and their functional diversity mainly arises
from their chemical make-up. For instance, while other biopolymers, such as polysac-
charides and nucleic acids, are made up of one or a few monomers, proteins and poly-
peptides are made up of combinations of 20 different amino acids. In some proteins,
some of the amino acid residues are enzymatically modified by the cytoplasmic enzymes.
Examples of such modifications include glycosylation (ovalbumin, K-casein, lectins, and
vicilin-type proteins of legumes) and phosphorylation (a- and p-caseins, phosvitin, ki-
nases, phosphorylases). In addition, unlike the ether and phosphodiester bonds that link
the monomers in polysaccharides and nucleic acids, respectively, the substituted amide
linkage in proteins is a partial double bond; this adds to the structural complexity of
protein polymers. The various types of noncovalent interactions between the amino acid
constituents and the specific properties of the amide linkage impart a multitude of spatial
structural forms to proteins with diverse biological functions. Literally innumerable num-
bers of proteins with distinct structures and functions can be synthesized by varying the
amino acid composition and sequence.
The functional properties of proteins in foods are related to their structural and
other physicochemical characteristics. A fundamental understanding of the physical,
chemical, and functional properties of proteins and the changes these properties undergo
2 Damodaran
where AG,,,,-,, is the transfer free energy of the amino acid from ethanol to water,
S,,, and S,,., are the solubilities of the amino acid in ethanol and water, respectively,
T is the temperature, and R is the gas constant.
Because an amino acid can be considered as a derivative of glycine, and since
AG,,,,,, is an additive function, the transfer free energy of an amino acid can be con-
sidered to be sum of the transfer free energies of glycine and the side chain, i.e.,
AGt.s~dechain = AGt,AA - AGt.Gly a
The hydrophobicities of amino acid side chains obtained in this manner are listed in
Table 1. Amino acid side chains with large positive AG, values are hydrophobic; they
prefer to be in an organic phase or in the protein interior rather than in an aqueous
environment. Amino acid side chains with negative AG, values, especially the charged
amino acid side chains, prefer to be on the protein exterior exposed to the aqueous
environment.
The functional behaviors of biologically important proteins and food proteins are
dependent on their structures. Four levels of structural hierarchy, namely, primary, sec-
ondary, tertiary, and quaternary structures, exist in proteins.
Food Proteins: An Overview
Alanine 2.09
Arginine -
Asparagine 0
Aspartic acid 2.09
Cysteine 4.18
Glutamic acid 2.09
Glutamine -0.42
Glycine 0
Histidine 2.09
lsoleucine 12.54
Leucine 9.61
Lysine -
Methionine 5.43
Phenylalanine 10.45
Proline 10.87
Serine - 1.25
Threonine 1.67
Tryptophan 14.21
Tyrosine 9.61
Valine 6.25
Source: Ref. 1.
A. Primary Structure
The primary structure of a protein denotes the linear sequence in which the constituent
amino acids are linked via peptide bonds. The chain length and the amino acid sequence
of the polypeptide determines its ultimate three-dimensional structure in solution.
One of the structural features that distinguishes proteins from other biopolymers,
such as polysaccharides and nucleic acids, is the partial double-bond character of the
peptide bond, resulting from its resonance structure:
Because of this resonance structure, the rotation of the peptide bond is restricted to a
maximum of about 6",the six atoms of the peptide unit becomes planar, protonation of
the peptide N-H group becomes impossible, the oxygen and hydrogen atoms of C=O
and N-H groups acquire partial negative and positive charges, respectively, and the
peptide unit can exist in either cis or trans configuration. Almost all peptide bonds in
proteins exist in the trans configuration, because it is more stable than the cis configu-
4 Damodaran
ration. Because of the partial charges of the C=O and N-H groups, interchain and
intrachain hydrogen bonding between these groups is possible under appropriate
conditions.
Because the peptide bonds constitute one third of all covalent bonds of the poly-
peptide backbone, the restriction on their rotational freedom drastically reduces the flex-
ibility of the polypeptide chain. Among the covalent bonds of the peptide backbone,
only the N-C, and the C,-C bonds have rotational freedoms, and these are termed 4
(phi) and @ (psi) dihedral angles, respectively. However, steric hindrance arising from
bulk side chains attached to the a-carbon atom restricts rotational freedoms of the 4 and
@ angles as well. Because of these constraints, a majority of proteins do not exist in
flexible random coil conformations in solution. On the contrary, most proteins assume a
highly compact ordered structure because of steric factors and other noncovalent inter-
actions among the amino acid residues. The selection of the 20 different amino acids
and the choice of peptide (amide) bond as the primary linkage appear to be a deliberate
design by nature to precisely control the flexibility and/or rigidity of polypeptides so
that they may be used to perform several biological functions.
B. Secondary Structure
The secondary structure relates to periodic structures in polypeptides and proteins, in
which the consecutive amino acid residues of the segment assume the same set of 4 and
@ angles. The most commonly found secondary structures in proteins are the a-helix
and the P-sheet. The a-helix is characterized by a pitch of 5.4 A involving 3.6 amino
acid residues. It is stabilized by intrachain hydrogen bonding between the ithN-H group
and the C=O group of the i-41h residue.
Recent studies indicate that the instruction for a-helix formation is coded as a
binary code (related to the arrangement of polar and nonpolar residues) in the amino
acid sequence [2]. Peptide segments with repeating heptet sequences of
[-P-N-P-P-N-N-P-1, where P and N are polar and nonpolar residues, re-
spectively, readily form a-helices. In this binary code, the precise identities of the polar
and nonpolar residues are irrelevant. Slight variations in the binary code are tolerated,
provided other interactions in the protein are favorable for a-helix formation. A good
example of this is tropomyosin, which exists entirely in a coiled-coil a-helical rod form.
In this protein, the repeating heptet sequence is [-N-P-P-N-P-P-P-1; despite
this variation, tropomyosin exists in a a-helix form because of other favorable interac-
tions in the coiled-coil rod [3].
The a-helical structures in protein are predominantly amphiphilic, that is, one half
of the helical surface is hydrophilic and the other half is hydrophobic. In fact, if an a-
helix is made out of the heptet sequence mentioned above, one would find that all the
hydrophobic amino acid residues would lay on one side of the helix surface and all the
hydrophilic residues would lay on the other side. Generally, in native proteins, the hy-
drophobic surface of the a-helix faces the interior of the protein and is engaged in
hydrophobic interactions with other nonpolar groups in the interior. Such interactions
generally contribute to the stability of the folded form of the protein.
The 0-sheet structure is an extended structure in which the C=O and N-H groups
are oriented perpendicular to the direction of the backbone. In this configuration, hydro-
gen bonding can occur only between sheets. Depending on the directions of the sheets,
Food Proteins: An Overview 5
two types of P-pleated sheet structure, namely, parallel and antiparallel P-sheets, can
form. The binary code in the amino acid sequence that specifies P-sheet formation is
[-N-P-N-P-N-P-N-. . . .I. In other words, segments containing alternating
polar and nonpolar amino acid residues exhibit a high probability of forming P-sheets.
Generally, p-type proteins are more hydrophobic than the a-type proteins. They exhibit
high denaturation temperatures. Examples are P-lactoglobulin (5 1% P-sheet) and soy
1IS globulin (64% P-sheet), which have thermal denaturation temperatures of 75.6 and
84.5"C, respectively. In contrast, bovine serum albumin, which is an a-type protein, has
a thermal denaturation temperature of only about 64°C [4,5]. When protein solutions are
heated, more often than not, a-helix is converted to p-sheet [4], but conversion of P-
sheet to a-helix has not been reported.
Polypeptide segments in which the consecutive amino acid residues assume random
combinations of C$ and $ angles have disordered or aperiodic structures. Proteins con-
taining high levels of proline residues usually assume a random structure. This is because
of their pyrrolidine ring structure, in which the 4 angle is fixed at 70°C and their inability
to form hydrogen bonds. A good example is casein: a- and p-caseins consist of about
8.5 and 17% proline residues, respectively. The uniform distribution of these residues in
its sequence hinders with formation of a-helical and P-sheet structures, and these pro-
teins exist predominantly in disordered states. About one third of the residues in collagen
are either proline or hydroxyproline, which exists in a helical form in which three poly-
peptide chains are entwined to form a triple helix; the triple helix is stabilized by inter-
chain hydrogen bonds. The geometry of this triple helix is different from that of the a-
helix. Other food proteins that contain a large amount of proline residues include cereal
proteins, such as gliadins and glutenins. Since the main biological function of caseins
and cereal proteins is to be nitrogen and energy sources for infants and germinating
seeds, a disordered structure is necessary to ensure high susceptibility of these proteins
to proteolytic digestion.
C. Tertiary Structure
The tertiary structure refers to the spatial arrangement of the entire polypeptide chain
with secondary structure segments into a compact three-dimensional folded form. Met-
amorphosis of a protein from a linear primary configuration into an intricate tertiary
structure form in solution is a complex process; this is driven by the thermodynamic
requirement to minimize the free energy of the molecule through optimization of various
noncovalent interactions (hydrophobic, electrostatic, and van der Waals interactions and
hydrogen bonding) between various groups in the protein. The most important geometric
rearrangement that occurs during tertiary structure formation is the relocation of the
nonopolar residues at the interior and disposal of the hydrophilic residues at the exterior
of the protein molecule. Although a majority of hydrophobic groups are buried in the
protein interior, not all of them can be buried. In fact, analysis of the surfaces of several
globular proteins indicates that about 40-50% of the water-accessible protein surface is
occupied by apolar residues [6]. Likewise, some polar residues are inevitably buried in
the interior of proteins; however, these buried polar groups are usually hydrogen bonded
to each other or engaged in electrostatic interaction with oppositely charged residues,
such that their free energies are minimized in the apolar environment of the protein
interior. Being very strong in low dielectric environments, these buried ion-pair inter-
6 Damodaran
D. Quaternary Structure
The quaternary structure refers to spatial arrangement of a protein containing several
polypeptide chains. Each polypeptide chain is known as a subunit, and the quaternary
complex is referred to oligomeric structure. Proteins that contain more than 28% hydro-
phobic amino acid residues (Val, Leu, Ile, Phe, Pro) generally form oligomeric structures
(Fig. 1) [7]. The reason for this is that when the hydrophobic content is greater than
2896, it becomes physically impossible to bury all of the hydrophobic groups in the
protein interior. Consequently, the tertiary structure of such proteins contains nonpolar
patches on the surface, and hydrophobic interaction of these patches with adjacent protein
molecules in aqueous solution leads to formation of oligomeric structures. Thus, for-
mation of quaternary or oligomeric structure is primarily driven by the thermodynamic
requirement to bury exposed hydrophobic patches. Other noncovalent interactions, such
as electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding, at the interface of the subunits may
also contribute to the stability of the quaternary structure.
Many food proteins, such as cereal, legume, and oilseed proteins, are oligomeric
proteins with several subunits. Cereal proteins typically contain more than 35% hydro-
phobic amino acid residues and a high level (6-1 2%) of proline residues, and they exist
in complex oligomeric states [8]. Soy globulins (7s and 11s) contain more than 40%
hydrophobic amino acid residues. Because of this, the 7S protein exists as a trimeric
protein with three different subunits and the 1 IS protein exists as a dodecamer with six
Food Proteins: An Overview
I---
ATC ADH
T M V Hb-a
LACT
FIGURE1 Mole percent of hydrophobic amino acids (Val, Pro, Leu, Ile, Phe) for a number
of single-chain (left) and multichain (right) globular proteins of exactly known composition
and known structure. TYM, Turnip yellow mosaic virus coat protein; TR, tryptophan syn-
thetase (A chain, E. coli); ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase (horse); LACT, bovine p-
lactoglobulin; TMV, tobacco mosaic virus coat protein; Hb, hemoglobin cu-chain (human);
Qp, phage Qp coat protein; He, hemerythrin (sipunculid); GPDy, glycerol-3-phosphate de-
hydrogenase (yeast); GDP, glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (pig); GDH, glutamate de-
hydrogenase (bovine); fD, phage fD coat protein; Mb, myoglobin (human); CA, carbonic
anhydrase (human); Ch, chymotrypsinogen (bovine); El, elastase (pig); La, bovine lactal-
burnin; Pe, bovine pepsinogen; St, subtilisin; Tr, bovine trypsin; Hb-m, hemoglobin (mon-
omeric, blowfly); SN, staphylococcal nuclease; CyC, cytochrome C (human); Ly, lysozyme
(chicken); RN, ribonuclease (bovine).
acidic and six basic subunits. Both proteins exhibit complex dissociation and association
behavior as a function of solution conditions, such as pH and ionic strength [9].
where hGH.h,,d,AG,,,, AG,,, and AG,.,,, respectively, are free energy changes for hy-
drogen bonding, electrostatic, hydrophobic, and van der Waals interactions, AS,,,, is the
8 Damodaran
change in the conformational entropy of the polypeptide, and T is the temperature. The
net stability, AG,, of most proteins, irrespective of their size, is in the range of 10-20
kcallmol; this indicates that, in spite of a multitude of interactions within protein mol-
ecules, they are only marginally stable. This metastable state can easily undergo con-
formational change when a few hydrogen bonds or electrostatic interactions or hydro-
phobic interactions are broken.
Disulfide bonds between cysteine residues in proteins can form as a result of protein
folding when two cysteine residues are brought to close proximity with proper orienta-
tion. Proteins that require high structural stability in biological systems, especially in
extracellular environments, usually contain disulfide bonds; the disulfide bonds stabilize
the structure by reducing the tendency of the polypeptide chain to unfold.
Because proteins are inherently in a metastable state with a net stability of only
about 10-20 kcallmol, changes in a protein's environment, such as pH, ionic strength,
temperature, and solvent composition, can easily induce conformational changes in the
protein. Such environment-induced conformational changes in proteins affect biological
functions in the case of enzymes and functional properties of food proteins. Enzymes
lose their activity upon denaturation, and denaturation of food proteins usually causes
insolubilization and loss of some functional properties. In some instances, partial dena-
turation of food proteins is desirable. For example, thermal denaturation of trypsin and
amylase inhibitors of legumes improves digestibility and bioavailability of proteins and
carbohydrates in legume-containing foods. Partially denatured proteins are generally
more digestible and possess better functional properties, such as foaming and emulsifying
properties, than do native proteins.
Protein denaturation is often considered to be a two-state transition phenomenon.
That is, once a protein molecule begins to unfold, or once a few interactions in the
protein are broken, the other interactions in the protein are weakened and the whole
molecule completely unfolds when the denaturant concentration is increased. This co-
operative nature of unfolding, observed with several small molecular weight proteins,
suggests that globular proteins can exist only in the native and denatured states. However,
recent studies with several proteins have shown that proteins can exist in a stable inter-
mediate folded state known as a "molten globule state" [lo-141. The molten globule
state is characterized by a relatively compact globule with nativelike secondary structure
and a disrupted tertiary structure. One of the most extensively studied molten globule
state is that of a-lactalbumin [14]. a-Lactalbumin assumes a molten globule state at
extremes of pH, i.e., in the pH range 4.2-3.0 and above pH 9.5 [15], at moderate
concentrations (-2 M) of guanidine hydrochloride at neutral pH [lo], and when one of
the four disulfide bonds of the protein is reduced [16]. The state of the molecule under
all of these denaturing conditions is identical, implying that unfolding of a-lactalbumin
under equilibrium conditions follows a general scheme:
where N, A, and D are the native, molten globule, and denatured states, respectively.
The rate of transition between A and D is more rapid than that between N and A. It has
been observed that the far-UV circular dichroic spectrum of the molten globule state of
a-lactalbumin is similar to that of the native protein, indicating that it has the same
backbone secondary structure as that of the native state, whereas NMR, difference ab-
sorption spectrum, fluorescence, and near-UV circular dichroic spectra of the molten
Food Proteins: An Overview 9
globule state were quite different from those of the native state, indicating that the tertiary
structure was different from that of the native state. The hydrodynamic size of the molten
A
globule state was only slightly larger than that of the native state (i.e., 50 vs. 35 A)
(Fig. 2), suggesting that the molecule is in a slightly expanded but compact shape.
The molten globule state of a-lactalbumin formed at acid pH 4.2-3.0 is found to
be susceptible to aggregation. This is presumably because of greater exposure of hydro-
phobic surface through alterations in the tertiary structure. This behavior has been suc-
cessfully exploited in the fractionation of a-lactalbumin from cheese whey, which in-
volves precipitation of the protein by heating at 55°C for 30 minutes at pH 3.8 [17]. The
molten globule state exhibits strong affinity for hydrophobic ligands [I81 and readily
forms complexes with phospholipid vesicles [19,20]. Perhaps this latter property is the
basis for formation of an insoluble lipoprotein complex between a-lactalbumin and whey
phospholipids when the pH of the cheese whey is decreased to pH 3.8 at elevated
temperature.
It is very likely that several food proteins may exhibit stable molten globule states
under appropriate conditions. These partially denatured states may possess unique func-
tional properties different from those of the native and fully denatured states. For ex-
ample, in the native state, whey proteins (P-lactoglobulin and a-lactalbumin) are ex-
tremely soluble in the pH range 3-10; they do not precipitate at their isoelectric pH.
However, when an average of one in six disulfide bonds in whey proteins is reduced by
oxidative sulfitolysis, the reduced proteins show a U-shaped pH-solubility profile with
minimum solubility at about pH 4.5 [21]. This dramatic change in the pH-solubility
characteristics of whey proteins might be attributable to formation of a molten
globule-like state upon partial reduction of disulfide bonds in these proteins [16].
Protein denaturation can be caused by several agents, such as heat, pressure, inter-
facial forces, mechanical shear, extremes of pH, chaotropic salts, detergents, and organic
solvents. Heat and pressure (e.g., extrusion) are the most commonly used agents in food
processing. The effects of these agents, especially thermal and pressure effects, on protein
denaturation are discussed in detail in other chapters.
The structural stability of proteins is mainly maintained by noncovalent interac-
tions, such as hydrogen bonding, electrostatic, hydrophobic, and van der Waals inter-
proteins and hydrophobic index and the average residue volumes as the independent
variables were analyzed, a positive coefficient for the average residue volume and a
negative coefficient for the hydrophobicity index were found [30]. These analyses at best
suggest that the mean residue hydrophobicity is not a meaningful index to relate stability
to hydrophobicity. One of the factors contributing to this unreliability is the fact that, in
a typical globular protein, about 40-50% of a protein's surface is occupied by nonpolar
residues. Evidently, these exposed residues, instead of stabilizing the protein structure,
may in fact tend to destabilize it. More often the exposed nonpolar residues are smaller
residues, such as alanine, with small residue volume; the large nonpolar amino acid
residues, such as leucine and isoleucine, have a greater tendency than the small apolar
residues to be buried in the protein interior. This might be one of the reasons for a strong
correlation between the average residue volume and the melting temperature, but not
between the average hydrophobicity and the melting temperature.
Arginine is often found in abundance in proteins of thermophilic organisms [22],
although its precise role in thermostability of proteins is not known. Combinations of
certain groups of amino acid residues have been shown to influence thermostability of
proteins. For example, statistical analysis of 15 different proteins has shown that thermal
denaturation temperatures of these proteins were positively correlated (r, = 0.96) to the
number percent of Asp, Cys, Glu, Lys, Leu, Arg, Trp, and Tyr residues [33]. On the
other hand, thermal denaturation temperatures of the same set of proteins were negatively
correlated (r2 = -0.95) to the number percent of Ala, Asp, Gly, Gln, Ser, Thr, Val, and
Tyr (Fig. 3). Other amino acid residues or other combinations of amino acid residues
have been found to have poor correlation with thermal denaturation temperatures. It is
notable that negatively and positively charged amino acid residues, in addition to large
hydrophobic residues, appear in the stabilizing group of amino acids. This may mean
that a combination of salt bridges and hydrophobicity is essential for flexibilitylrigidity
and thermostability of proteins.
FIGURE3 Group correlations of amino acid residues to thermal stability of globular pro-
teins. Group X, represents Asp, Cys, Glu, Lys, Leu, Arg, Trp, and Tyr. Group X, represents
Ala, Asp, Gly, Gln, Ser, Thr, Val, and Tyr. (Adapted from Ref. 33.)
(such as pH, temperature, and salt concentration), or interaction with other food
constituents.
Although much is known about the physicochemical properties of several proteins
and their functional properties in simple model systems, prediction of their behavior in
real food systems has not been successful. One of the main reasons for this is denatur-
ation of proteins during food processing and preparation. A combination of factors such
as pH, temperature, ionic environment, and interaction of other food constituents (lipids,
carbohydrates, salts, etc.) with proteins can cause unpredictable structural changes in
proteins and thus affect their functional behaviors. In addition, the methods used for
protein isolation can also cause variations in the initial conformation of proteins, which
in turn may affect their behavior in a particular food product. Despite these difficulties,
studies on functional properties of proteins in model systems have provided considerable
insight into structure-function relationships of food proteins.
The structure-functionality relationships of various proteins with regards to many
of the functions listed in Table 2 will be covered in detail in other chapters. Therefore,
only those functional properties not discussed in other chapters will be discussed in the
following sections.
A. Protein-Water Interactions
Water is an essential constituent of all living matter and of course of foods as well. Since
the native structure of a protein to begin with is a consequence of its interaction with
Food Proteins: An Overview 13
solvent water, its function in a food product is intimately related to its interaction with
water. In fact, on a empirical level, the various functional properties of proteins can be
viewed as manifestations of its interaction with water. For example, dispersibility, wett-
ability, swelling, and solubility are related to thermodynamics of protein-water interac-
tions. Properties such as thickening/viscosity, gelation, coagulation, etc., are hydrody-
namic properties of protein polymers affected both by their size, shape, and molecular
flexibility and their interaction with solvent water. Similarly, surface-active properties,
such as foaming and emulsification, are simply the result of thermodynamically unfa-
vorable interaction of exposed nonpolar patches of proteins with solvent water.
Water molecules bind to both polar and nonpolar (hydrophobic hydration) groups
in proteins via dipole-dipole, charge-dipole, and dipole-induced dipole interactions.
Charged amino acid residues, such as lysyl, arginyl, glutamic, and aspartic residues, bind
about 6 moles of water per residue; uncharged polar residues, such as Ser, Thr, Gln, and
Asn, bind about 2 moles of water per residue; the nonpolar amino acid residues bind
about 1 mole of water per residue. The hydration capacity of a protein therefore is
related, in part, to its amino acid composition [ 3 5 ] ;the greater the number of charged
residues, the greater the hydration capacity. Because a majority of nonpolar amino acid
residues and a significant number of polar groups (e.g., peptide bond groups and some
Gln and Asn residues) are buried in the protein interior, which are not hydrated, the
14 Damodaran
hydration capacity of proteins must arise predominantly from binding of water to amino
acid residues on the protein's surface.
Typically, proteins bind about 0.3-0.5 g waterlg protein at a water activity of 0.9.
This primarily represents an unfreezable, monomolecular layer of water on a protein's
surface. This water is often referred to as "bound" water, with the connotation that it is
immobile. Thermodynamic data, however, suggest otherwise. For instance, in the mon-
olayer hydration range of 0.07-0.27 g waterlg protein, the free energy change for de-
sorption of water molecules from the protein surface is about 0.18 kcallmol at 25°C
[36], which is significantly lower than the thermal kinetic energy of water at 25°C (-0.6
kcallmol). Therefore, the "bound" water must be reasonably mobile. Unlike globular
proteins, casein micelles bind about 4 g waterlg protein. This is attributable to the
enormous amount of void spaces within the casein micelle structure, which imbibes water
through capillary action and physical entrapment. The hydration capacity of a denatured
globular protein is only about 10% greater than that of the native protein. This is because
of the fact that even in the denatured state the protein retains much of its folded structure,
although in a nonnative state, with the result that the surface area-to-volume (or mass)
ratio of the protein is not drastically altered. Aggregation of the denatured protein also
buries a significant amount of the protein's surface area.
Solution conditions, such as pH, ionic strength, and temperature, affect hydration
of proteins. The hydration capacity is minimal at the isoelectric pH of a protein, where
the net charge is zero and protein-protein interaction is maximum. At low concentration,
i.e., <0.2 M, salts increase the hydration capacity of proteins. At this low ionic strength,
although weak binding of salt counterions to proteins results in screening of the charges,
it does not affect the hydration shells of charged groups, and the increase in hydration
capacity essentially comes from the hydration shells of the bound ions.
In food applications, the water-holding capacity or water-uptake capacity of a pro-
tein is more important than its hydration capacity. Water-holding capacity refers to the
ability of a protein matrix, such as protein particles, protein gels, or muscle, to absorb
and retain water against gravity. This water includes bound water, hydrodynamic water,
capillary water, and physically entrapped water. The physically entrapped water, however,
is the largest fraction. It imparts juiciness and tenderness, particularly in comminuted
meat products.
B. Solubility
Several functional properties, such as thickening, foaming, emulsification, and gelation,
of proteins are affected by protein solubility. Solubility of a protein is fundamentally
related to its hydrophilicitylhydrophobicity balance. Thus, the amino acid composition
of a protein inherently affects its solubility characteristics. Because solubility of a protein
is a manifestation of the differences in the energetics of protein-protein and protein-
solvent interactions, Bigelow [37] suggested that the average hydrophobicity of amino
acid residues and charge frequency are the two most important factors that determine
solubility of proteins: the lower the average hydrophobicity and the higher the charge
frequency, the higher the solubility. However, it has been pointed out that although the
solubility characteristics of several proteins follow this empirical relationship, there are
several exceptions [38]. On a fundamental level, the solubility characteristics of proteins
should be related to composition of the protein's surface (and not necessarily to its overall
amino acid composition) and the thermodynamics of its interaction with the solvent.
Food Proteins: An Overview 15
-
- Native
1 min
lOmin
20 min
FIGURE4 pH-solubility profile of whey protein isolate heat denatured at 70°C for various
times. (From Ref. 39.)
philic groups increases (salting-in) with increase of ionic strength. That is, the salting-
in and salting-out characteristics of a protein by salts is fundamentally related to the
hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity characteristics of the protein surface.
The surface hydrophobicity of proteins is usually measured by the fluorescent probe
(such as cis-parinaric acid and 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonicacid)-binding method
[40]. Although this approach provides some information about the nonpolarity of the
protein surface, it is doubtful whether the measured value truly reflects the "hydropho-
bicity" of the protein surface. For instance, the surface hydrophobicity (as measured by
the cis-parinaric acid-binding method) of WPI decreased with heating time at 70°C [39],
whereas the solubility of the same heat-denatured WPI samples showed a decrease at
pH 4.6 with increase in heating time (Fig. 4), indicating an increase in hydrophobicity
of the protein surface with heating time. This contradiction between fluorescence
probe-binding value and the solubility characteristics can be resolved only by recogniz-
ing that these two techniques probe two different properties of the protein surface. It has
been shown that binding of fluorescent probes to proteins occurs only at well-defined
hydrophobic cavities formed by grouping of nonpolar residues on the protein surface
[38].These cavities are not accessible to water but are accessible to nonpolar ligands.
In this regard, these cavities do not affect the solubility characteristics of the protein.
When these hydrophobic cavities are dissociated upon heating and the constituent hy-
drophobic residues are distributed randomly on the protein surface, then no significant
binding of the fluorescent probe to the protein occurs. However, distribution of these
hydrophobic residues on the protein surface exposed to solvent water would greatly
enhance the hydrophobic character or the true surface hydrophobicity of the protein and
would significantly alter its solubility characteristics.
The true relative surface hydrophobicity of proteins can be measured from their
solubility behavior in salt solutions at isoelectric pH. For example, Figure 5 shows the
effect of NaCl on the solubility at pH 4.6 of WPI that had been heat denatured at 70°C
for various periods of time. The effectiveness of NaCl in solubilizing heat-denatured
WPI decreases as the heating time is increased, showing that the hydrophobic character
of the protein surface was enhanced as the heating time at 70°C was increased. The
initial slope of these salt-solubility profiles can be used as an index of surface hydro-
phobicity of the proteins.
-
U Native
+ 1 min
* 10rnin
20 min
NaCl (rnM)
FIGURE5 Solubility of heat-denatured (70°C for various times) whey protein isolate at pH
4.6 as a function of NaCl concentration.
Specific viscositya
molecules. Also, the ability of the protein to absorb water and swell affects its viscosity.
Partial denaturation andlor heat-induced polymerization, which causes an increase in the
hydrodynamic size of proteins, increases viscosity. For example, Table 3 shows the effect
of heat on specific viscosity of WPI solutions at two different heating conditions [39].
At 70°C, the viscosity of a 5% WPI solution increases with heating time; however, the
increase was only about twofold after 20-minute heating time compared to that of the
unheated control. On the other hand, when a 9% WPI solution was heated at 90°C for
various periods of time and the diluted to 5% final concentration, the specific viscosity
increased almost 10-fold after 20-minute heating. These differences are mainly due to
the extent of polymerization of the proteins under these two heating conditions. The two
most important factors that affect viscosity of protein solutions are the hydrodynamic
shape and the size of the protein molecules, which follow the relationship:
where p is shape factor, C is the concentration, v, and v, are the partial specific volumes
of the solvent and the protein, respectively, and 6 , is the gram of water bound per gram
of protein. Since heating of WPI under two different heating conditions does not signif-
icantly change its q and 6 , values, the phenomenal increase in the specific viscosity of
the WPI sample heated at 90°C must be due to an increase in its hydrodynamic size and
shape. This has been shown to be related to formation of soluble polymers via sulfhydryl-
disulfide interchange reactions [39].
At high protein concentrations, protein solutions display a pseudoplastic behavior
[41,42]. The pseudoplastic behavior is the result of the tendency of protein molecules to
orient their major axis in the direction of flow. When shearing is stopped, the oriented
protein molecules, depending on their molecular properties and intermolecular interac-
tions in the oriented state, may or may not return to the state of random orientation and
dispersion in solution. Spontaneous return to random orientation will cause return of the
viscosity to its original value. Solutions of fibrous proteins, e.g., gelatin and actomyosin,
do not quickly relax to random orientation, and thus the viscosity remains low compared
to its original value. On the other hand, solutions of globular proteins, e.g., whey proteins
and soy proteins, rapidly regain their original viscosity when the flow is stopped [43].
The viscosity of some protein solutions, e.g., P-lactoglobulin, increases with time
when the solution is sheared at a constant shear rate [41]. This is attributable to shear-
induced partial denaturation and sulfhydryl disulfide-induced polymerization of
P-lactoglobulin.
Solution conditions, such as pH, ionic strength, and temperature, affect viscosity
of protein solutions. The viscosity of globular protein solutions generally decreases as
the pH is decreased toward the protein's isoelectric pH. Partial heat denaturation gen-
erally increases the viscosity of commercial whey protein concentrates (WPC). For in-
stance, heat denaturation of WPC at acidic pH caused a 10-fold increase in apparent
viscosity compared to unheated WPC under comparable protein concentration [44]. In-
crease of ionic strength generally decreases the viscosity of protein solutions by affecting
their hydration capacity. In this respect, the effects of divalent salts, e.g., calcium salts,
is more pronounced than monovalent salts. For example, progressive replacement of
calcium ions with sodium ions progressively increased the viscosity of a solution of
commercial WPC.
Food Proteins: An Overview 19
D. Flavor Binding
The flavor-binding ability of proteins is related to interaction of small molecular weight
flavorants with hydrophobic pockets or crevices on the protein's surface [45-471. The
extent of binding thus depends on the number of hydrophobic patches on the protein's
surface. In addition to hydrophobic interactions, flavorants with polar groups may also
bind to proteins via hydrogen bonding or electrostatic interactions. The mechanism of
fat- and flavor-binding properties of proteins are discussed in Chapter 5.
The natural ability of proteins to bind flavor compounds has both desirable and
undesirable implications. For instance, aldehydes and ketones generated from oxidation
of unsaturated fatty acids in oilseeds, such as soybean, bind to proteins and resist their
removal during solvent extraction of the meal. For example, the grassy and beany off-
flavors of soy protein concentrates and isolates are mainly due to bound hexanal. Upon
binding to surface hydrophobic cavities on the protein, hexanal may diffuse into the
hydrophobic interior of the protein and thus resist its removal during extraction with
organic solvents such as hexane.
Proteins can also be used as flavor carriers or flavor modifiers in foods, especially
in plant protein-based meat analogs. In such applications, the proteins should be able
to bind flavors reasonably tightly and retain them during processing. However, proteins
do not bind all flavorants with equal affinity. Because of this, the relative concentrations
of various flavorants in the final food product is often different from that added before
processing; this affects the flavor profile of the final product.
Proteins can modify the flavor profile of a food product by selectively binding
some flavorants more tightly than the others. An example of this is the flavor profile of
yogurt containing whey proteins. Because whey proteins, especially P-lactoglobulin,
strongly bind some of the flavor compounds in yogurt, they alter the aroma profile. In
addition, during eating, poor release of these bound flavor components in the mouth also
affects the flavor profile of yogurt.
Protein-bound flavorants do not contribute to taste and aroma unless they are re-
leased readily in the mouth during mastication. Therefore, knowledge of the mechanisms
of interaction and relative binding affinity of various flavorants under various environ-
mental and processing conditions are necessary both for preparing flavored protein-
containing products and for devising effective strategies to remove off-flavors from pro-
tein preparations.
E. Gelation
Gelation refers to the transformation of a protein in the sol state into a gel-like structure
by heat or other agents [38]. The mechanisms involved in protein gelation and charac-
terization of the rheological properties of protein gels are described in Chapter 4. There-
fore, only a few molecular properties of proteins affecting their gelation are discussed
below.
Proteins form two types of gels: coagulum and transparent gels. The type of gel
formed by a protein is primarily influenced by its amino acid composition, although
solution conditions, such as pH and ionic strength, also play a role. Proteins containing
a high frequency of nonpolar amino acid residues tend to form coagulum-type gels [48],
whereas proteins that contain a high frequency of hydrophilic amino acids form trans-
parent gels. Shimada and Matsushita [48] found that proteins form coagulum-type gels
20 Darnodaran
when the sum of Val, Pro, Leu, Ile, Phe, and Trp residues of the protein is above 31.5
mol%. At high levels of apolar amino acid content, the rate and extent of protein-protein
interactions among thermally unfolded proteins seem to be greater than those of protein-
water (solvent) interactions, leading to formation of a weak coagulum-type gel.
Like all polymer gels, including gels of synthetic polymers, the stability of a protein
gel network against thermal and mechanical stresses depends on the number and nature
of the cross-links formed per polymer chain. Theoretically, a gel network will be stable
when the sum of the interaction energies of a polymer chain in the network is greater
than its thermal kinetic energy at a given temperature. Since at a given temperature the
thermal kinetic energy of a large polymer chain is lower than that of a small polymer
chain, gel network structures formed with large polymers are more stable. Also, in a
given mass of the gel network, the number of cross-links formed per polymer chain is
usually greater in long-chain polymers than their short-chain counterparts; this is due to
a decrease in the concentration of "ends" or "tails" of the polymer chains, which often
do not take part in cross-linhng. It has been shown that the square root of the hardness
of gelatin gels is linearly related to molecular weight (i.e., chain length) [49]. Globular
proteins also exhibit a similar relationship [50]. Furthermore, globular proteins with
molecular weights less than 23,000 and devoid of either cystine or cysteine residues do
not form heat-induced gels at any reasonable protein concentration [50]. Proteins that
contain cysteine and cystine residues can form a gel even when the molecular weight is
<23,000; this is because of the occurrence of sulfhydryl-disulfide interchange reaction
during heating, which increases the molecular weight (chain length) to >23,000 [50].
Protein gels are highly hydrated structures containing anywhere from 85 to 98%
water depending on the protein concentration used. Experimental evidence shows that
the water in these gels has chemical potential (activity) close to that of liquid water. The
mechanism by which the liquid water is transformed to a semi-solid-like state and held
within the gel network in a nonflowable form is not properly understood. It is known
that translucent gels, such as gelatin gels, hold more water than coagulum-type gels.
Translucent gel networks are primarily held together by hydrogen bonding and electro-
static interactions and only to a limited extent by hydrophobic interactions. Thus, the
mode of retention of water within the gel network may involve hydrogen bonding with
the polar groups of the polypeptide backbone (i.e., NH and CO groups) and the side
chain charged groups (i.e., COO- and NH,'). However, these alone cannot account for
the amount of water retained in the gel network. For instance, the number of moles of
water bound per mole of each of these hydrogen bonding and ionic groups is known
[51]. A simple estimation would suggest that, in a 10% protein gel, only a fraction of
the total water in the gel is physically bound to these polar groups. Therefore, water
binding alone cannot explain immobilization of a large amount of water within a gel
network. A possible hypothetical explanation is as follows: A translucent gel can be
considered as a two-phase system in which minute droplets of water are dispersed in a
continuous network of polypeptide chains. In this confined environment, each water
droplet (cell) is surrounded by a force field emanating from the charged side chains and
the dipole groups of the polypeptide backbone (Fig. 6). Because of this force field, water
molecules may reorient and form an extensively hydrogen-bonded water-water network,
bridging the peptide polar groups across the cell. This extensively hydrogen-bonded
water structure may resemble that of the icelike structure, thus transforming the liquid
water into a semi-solid state. The rigidity of the hydrogen-bonded continuum structure
may increase with a decrease in cell size.
Food Proteins: An Overview
V. CONCLUSIONS
The precise role of protein structure and how its structural transformation in a food
milieu contributes to the expression of sensory properties is not well understood and is
the topic of investigation in several laboratories. It must be emphasized that the sensory
qualities of a food are not simply related to a single functional attribute of the protein
ingredient; it is rather a manifestation of complex interactions among its various func-
tional attributes. For example, for a protein to be functional in a cake, it should possess
gellinglheat-setting, foaming, and emulsifying properties in the presence of the other
ingredients used in cake mixes. In other words, it should be able to display multiple
functionalities in a complex food milieu. Theoretically, a single protein cannot be ex-
pected to possess all the desirable multiple functionalities required in a particular food
system. In practice, however, this can be achieved by using a mixture of different pro-
teins, each one contributing to different functional attribute required in a particular food
product. The proteins of animal origin, e.g., meat, milk, and egg proteins, which are
mixtures of several proteins, are capable of performing multiple functions. For example,
egg white possesses multiple functionalities such as gelation, emulsification, foaming,
water binding, and heat coagulation, which makes it a highly desirable protein in many
foods. The multiple functionalities of egg white are products of complex interactions
among its protein constituents, namely, ovalbumin, conalbumin, lysozyme, ovomucin,
globulins, and other proteins. The unique viscoelastic properties of wheat gluten arise
from its protein constituents, namely, glutenins and gliadins. The elasticity of dough is
due to intermolecular interactions between glutenins (disulfide cross-linhng, hydrogen
22 Damodaran
REFERENCES
1. Y. Nozaki and C. Tanford, The solubility of amino acids and two glycine peptides in aqueous
ethanol and dioxane solutions, J. Biol. Chem. 246:2211 (1972).
2. S. Kamtekar, J. Schiffer, H. Xiong, J. M. Babik, and M. H. Hecht, Protein design by binary
patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids, Science 262: 1680 ( 1 993).
3. A. Mak, L. B. Smille, and G. Stewart, A comparison of the amino acid sequences of rabbit
skeletal muscle a- and P-tropomyosins, J. Biol. Chem. 2553647 (1980).
4. S. Damodaran, Refolding of thermally unfolded soy proteins during the cooling regime of
the gelation process: effect on gelation, J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:262 (1988).
5 . S. Damodaran, Influence of protein conformation on its adaptability under chaotropic con-
ditions, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 11:2 (1989).
6. B. Lee and F. M. Richards, The interpretation of protein structure: Estimation of static ac-
cessibility, J. Mol. Biol. 55:379 ( 1971 ).
Food Proteins: An Overview 23
K. E. Van Holde, Effects of amino acid composition and microenvironment on protein struc-
ture, Food Proteins (J. R. Whitaker and S. R. Tannenbaum, eds.), AVI Publishing Co., Inc.,
Westport, CT, 1977, p. 1.
W. Bushuk and E. MacRitchie, Wheat proteins: aspects of structure that determine bread-
making quality, Protein Qualify and the Effects of Processing (R. Dixon Phillips and J. W.
Finley, eds.), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1989, p. 345.
N. C. Nielsen, Structure of soy proteins, New Protein Foods: Seed Storage Proteins, Vol. 5
(A. M. Altshul and H. L. Wilcke, eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1985, p. 27.
K. Kuwajima, A folding model of a-lactalbumin deduced from the three-state denaturation
mechanism, J. Mol. Biol. 114:241 (1977).
D. A. Dolgisk, A. P. Kolomiets, I. A. Bolotina, and 0 . B. Ptitsyn, 'Molten-globule' state
accumulates in carbonic anhydrase folding, FEBS Lett. 165:88 (1984).
F. M. Hughson, P. E. Wright, and R. L. Baldwin, Structural characterization of a partly folded
apomyoglobin intermediate, Science 249: 1544 (1990).
D. N. Brems and H. A. Havel, Folding of bovine growth hormone is consistent with the
molten globule hypothesis, Proteins: Struct. Funcr. Genetics 5:93 (1988).
K. Kuwajima, The molten globule state as a clue for understanding the folding and cooper-
ativity of globular-protein structure, Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genetics 6:87 (1989).
K. Kuwajima, Y. Ogawa, and S. Sugai, Role of the interaction between ionizable groups in
the folding of bovine a-lactalbumin, J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 89:759 (198 1 ).
J. J. Ewbank and T. E. Creighton, The molten globule protein conformation probed by di-
sulfide bonds, Nature 350:s 18 ( 1991 ).
J. L. Maubois, A. Pierre, J. Fauquant, and M. Piot, Industrial fractionation of main whey
proteins, Bull. Int. D a i y Fed. 212: 154 (1987).
P. M. Mulqueen and M. J. Kronman, Binding of naphthalene dyes to the N and A conformers
of bovine a-lactalbumin, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 215:28 (1982).
I. Hanssens, C. Houthuys, W. Herreman, and F. H. Van Cauwelaert, Interaction of
a-lactalbumin with dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine vesicels. I. A microcalorimetric and
fluorescence study, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 602539 (1980).
J. Kim and H. Kim, Fusion of phospholipid vesicels induced by a-lactalbumin at acidic pH,
Biochemisty 25:7867 ( 1986).
J. M. Gonzalez and S. Damodaran, Sulfitolysis of disulfide bonds in proteins using a solid
state copper carbonate catalyst, J. Agric. Food Chem. 38: 149 (1990).
D. J. Merkler, G. K. Farrington, and F. C. Wedler. Protein thermostability, Int. J. Peptide
Protein Res. 18:430 (198 1 ).
R. Singleton, Jr., C. R. Middaugh, and R. D. MacElroy, Comparison of proteins from ther-
mophilic and nonthermophilic sources in terms of structural parameters inferred from amino
acid composition, Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 10:39 (1977).
M. F. Pemtz, Electrostatic effects in proteins, Science 201: 1 187 (1978).
G. Biesecker, J. I. Hanis, J. C. Thieny, J. E. Walker, and A. J. Wonacott. Sequence and
structure of D-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus.
Nature 266:328 ( 1977).
R. L. Baldwin, Temperature dependence of the hydrophobic interaction in protein folding,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:8069 (1986).
K. A. Dill, D. 0. V. Alonso, and K. Hutchinson, Thermal stabilities of globular proteins,
Biochemistry 285439 ( 1989).
H. A. Scheraga, G. Nemethy, and I. Z. Steinberg, The contribution of hydrophobic bonds to
the stability of protein conformation, J. Biol. Chem. 237:2506 (1962).
P. L. Privalov. Y. V. Griko, Y. S. Venyaminov, and V. P. Kutyshenko. Cold denaturation of
myoglobin, J. Mol. Biol. 190:487 (1986).
H. B. Bull and K. Breese, Thermal stability of proteins, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 158:681
( 1 973).
24 Damodaran
C. N. Pace, Protein conformations and their stability, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 60:970 (1983).
P. Puyol, M. D. Perez, J. M. Peiro, and M. Calvo, Effect of binding of retinol and palmitic
acid to bovine Plactoglobulin on its resistance to thermal denaturation, J. Dairy Sci. 77: 1494
( 1994).
P. K. Ponnuswamy, R. Muthusamy, and P. Manavalan, Amino acid composition and thermal
stability of proteins, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 4:186 ( 1982).
J. E. Kinsella, Functional properties of food proteins: a review, CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci.
Nutr: 7219 (1976).
I . D. Kuntz and W. Kauzman, Hydration of proteins and polypeptides, Adv. Protein Chem.
28:239 ( 1974).
J. A. Rupley, P.-H. Yang, and G. Tollin, Thermodynamic and related studies of water inter-
acting with proteins, Water in Polymers (S. P. Rowland, ed.), ACS Symp. Ser. 127, American
Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1980, p. 91.
C. C. Bigelow, On the average hydrophobicity of proteins and the relation between it and
protein structure, J. Theor. Biol. 16: 187 (1967).
S. Damodaran, Interrelationship of molecular and functional properties of food proteins, in
Food Proteins (J. E. Kinsella and W. G. Soucie, eds.). American Oil Chemists' Society,
Champaign, IL, 1989, p. 2 1.
H. Zhu and S. Damodaran, Heat-induced conformational changes in whey protein isolate and
its relation to foaming properties, J. Agric. Food Chem. 425346 (1994).
A. Kato and S. Nakai, Hydrophobicity determined by a fluorescence probe method and its
correlation with surface properties of proteins, Biochim. Bioph-vs. Acta 624: 13 (1980).
P. Pradispena and C. Rha, Pseudoplastic and rheopectic properties of globular protein (P-
lactoglobulin) solution, J. Text. Stud. 8:3 1 1 (1977).
M. A. Tung, Rheology of protein dispersions, J. Text. Stud. 9:3 (1978).
A. M. Hermansson, Aspects of protein structure, rheology and texturization, in Food Texture
and Rheology (P. Sherman, ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1979, p. 265.
W. Modler and D. Emmons, Properties of whey protein concentrate prepared by heating under
acidic conditions, J. Dairy Sci. 60: 177 ( 1977).
S. Damodaran and J. E. Kinsella, Flavor-protein interactions: binding of carbonyls to bovine
serum albumin: thermodynamic and conformational effects, J. Agric. Food Chem. 28567
( 1980).
S. Damodaran and J. E. Kinsella, Interaction of carbonyls with soy protein: thermodynamic
effect, J. Agric. Food Chem. 29: 1249 ( 1981 ).
T. E. O'Neill and J. E. Kinsella, Binding of alkanone flavors to p-lactoglobulin: effects of
conformational and chemical modifications, J. Agric. Food Chem. 35:770 (1987).
K. Shimada and S. Matsushita, Relationship between thermo-coagulation of proteins and
amino acid compositions. J. Agric. Food Chern. 28:413 (1980).
J. D. Ferry, Mechanical properties of substances of high molecular weight. IV. Rigidities of
gelatin gels; dependence on concentration, temperature and molecular weight, J. Amer. Chem.
SOC.70:2244 ( 1948).
C.-H. Wang and S. Darnodaran, Thermal gelation of globular proteins: Weight average mo-
lecular weight dependence of gel strength, J. Agric. Food Chem. 38: 1 154 (1 990).
I. D. Kuntz and W. Kauzmann, Hydration of proteins and polypeptides, Adv. Protein Chem.
28:239 (1974).
J . E. Kinsella, S. Damodaran, and J. B. German, Physicochemical and functional properties
of oilseed proteins with emphasis on soy proteins, New Protein Foods: Seed Storage Proteins
(A. M. Altschul and H. L. Wilke, eds.), Academic Press, London.1985, p. 107.
References
Half Title
F o o d Emulsions:T h i r d Edition,Reviseda n d
Expanded,edited b y StigE. Friberg and
Kdre Larsson M i l k a n d D a i r y P r o d u c t T e
c h n o l o g y , Edgar Spreer
Copyright Page
2 7 0 MadisonAvenue,N e w York,NewYork10016
Preface
Alain Paraf
Contents
Index 665
Contributors
of proteins.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
acknowledged.
addressed.
Structure-FunctionRelationshipsof Caseins 22 1 A. L.
Andrews, D. Atkinson, M. T. A. Evans, E. G. Finer, J . P.
Green, M. C. Phillips, and R. N. Robertson, The
conformation and aggregation of bovine p-casein A. I:
Molecular aspects of thermal aggregation, B i o p o l y m
e r s 18: 1105 (1979). G. P. Beny and L. K. Creamer, The
association of bovine pcasein. The importance of the
C-terminal region, B i o c h e m i s t r y 14:3542
(1975). D. S. Home and D. G. Dalgleish, Electrostatic
interaction and the kinetics of protein aggre- gation:
a,,-casein, Int.J. B i o l . M a c r o m o l . 2:154
(1980). T. Ono, S. Odagiri, and T. Tagaki, Separation of
the submicelles of from micellar casein by high
performance gel chromatography on a TSK-GEL G4000SW
column, J . D a i r y Res.50: 37 (1983). D. G. Schmidt,
P. Both, and J. Koops, Properties of artificial casein
micelles. 3. Relationship between salt composition, size
and stability towards ethanol, dialysis and heat, N e t h
. Milk Dairy J.33:40 (1979). P. Walstra, V. A.
Bloomfield, G. J. Wei, and R. Jenness, Effect of chymosin
action on the hydrodynamic diameter of casein rnicelles,
B i o c h i m . B i o p h y s . A c t a 669:258 (1981).
M. Kalab, B. E. Phibbs-Todd, and P. Allan-Wojtas, Milk gel
structure XIII. Rotary shadowing of casein micelles for
electron microscopy, M i l c h w i s s e n s c h a f r
37513 (1982). C. W. Slattery and R. Evard, A model for
the formation and structure of casein rnicelles from
subunits of variable composition, Biochim.B i o p h y s .
A c t a 317529 (1973). P. Walstra, On the stability of
casein micelles, J. DairySci.73: 1965 (1 990). D. G.
Schmidt. Association of caseins and casein rnicelle
structure, D e v e l o p m e n t s in D a i r y
Chemistry-1.Proteins (P. F. Fox, ed.), Applied Science
Publishers, New York, 1982, p. 61. M. C. A. Griffin, R.
L. J. Lyster, and J. C. Price, The disaggregation of
calcium-depleted casein micelles, Eur: J .
Biochem.174:339 (1 988). C. Holt, D. T. Davies, and A. J.
R. Law, Effects of colloidal calcium phosphate content and
free calcium ion concentration in the milk serum on the
dissociation of bovine casein rnicelles, J .
DairyRes.53557 (1986). D. G. Dalgleish and A. J. R. Law,
pH-Induced dissociation of bovine casein rnicelles. I.
Analysis of liberated caseins, J . DairyRes.55529 (1988).
D. G. Dalgleish, D. S. Home, and A. J. R. Law,
Size-related differences in bovine casein micelles, B i o
c h i m . B i o p h y s . Acta991:383 (1989). D. S.
Home, Steric stabilization and casein micelle stability. J
. C o l l o i d InterfSci.111:250 (1986). C. Holt and
D. G. Dalgleish, Electrophoretic and hydrodynamic
properties of bovine casein micelles interpreted in terms
of particles with an outer hairy layer, J. C o l l o i d
I n t e 6 S c i . 114: 513 (1986). D. G. Dalgleish, The
enzymatic coagulation of milk, A d v a n c e d DairyC h e
m i s t r y , Vol. 1: Proteins(P. F. Fox, ed.), Elsevier
Applied Science, London, 1992, p. 579. P. Walstra, The
voluminosity of bovine casein micelles and some of its
implications, J . Dairy Res. 46:3 17 (1979). H. S.
Rollema and J. A. Brinkhuis, A H-NMR study of bovine
casein micelles; influence of pH, temperature and calcium
ions on rnicellar structure, J. D a i r y Res.56:417
(1989). D. G. Dalgleish, Denaturation and aggregation of
p-lactoglobulin in heated milk. J . A g r i c . Food C h
e m . 38: 1995 (1 990). H. Singh and P. F. Fox, Heat
stability of milk: pH-dependent dissociation of micellar
K-casein on heating milk at ultra high temperatures, J.
DairyRes.52:529 (1985). A. C. M. van Hooydonk, P. G. de
Koster, and I. J. Boemgter, The renneting properties of
heated milk, N e t h . MilkDairyJ . 41:3 (1987). H.
Singh, S. I. Shalabi, P. F. Fox, A. Flynn, and A. Bany,
Rennet coagulation of heated milk: influence of pH
adjustment before or after heating, J. DairyRes.55:205
(1988). E. Dickinson, Protein-stabilized emulsions,
J.Food Eng.2259 (1994). E. Dickinson, S. E. Rolfe, and D.
G. Dalgleish, Competitive adsorption of a,,-casein and
p-casein in oil-in-water emulsions, Food Hydrocoll.2:397
(1988). Y. Fang and D. G. Dalgleish, Dimensions of the
adsorbed layers in oil in water emulsions stabilized by
caseins, J . C o l l o i d Inte$ Sci. 156:329 (1993).
M. Britten and H. Giroux, Interfacial properties of milk
protein-stabilized emulsions as in- fluenced by protein
concentration, J. Agric.Food Chem.41:1187 (1993). J . A.
Hunt and D. G. Dalgleish, Adsorption behaviour of whey
protein isolate and caseinate in soya oil-in-water
emulsions, Food Hydrocoll.8:175 (1994). D. G. Dalgleish,
The conformations of proteins on solidlwater
interfaces-caseins and phos- vitin on polystyrene latices,
C o l l o i d s Su$ 46:141 (1990). D. V. Brooksbank, C.
M. Davidson, D. S. Home, and J. Leaver, Influence of
electrostatic interactions on j3-casein layers adsorbed
on polystyrene latices, J. Chem.Soc.Farad.Trans. 89:3419
(1993). J. Leaver and D. G. Dalgleish, Topography of
p-casein adsorbed at an oiltwater interface as determined
from the kinetics of trypsin-catalysed hydrolysis,
Biochim.Biophys.Acta1041: 217 (1990). E. Dickinson, D. S.
Home, J. Phipps, and R. Richardson, Aneutron reflectivity
study of the adsorption of p-casein at fluid interfaces,
Lungmuir 9:242 (1993). S. 0. Agboola and D. G .
Dalgleish, Calcium-induced destabilization of oil-in-water
emulsions stabilized by caseinate or by P-lactoglobulin,
J. Food Sci.60:399 (1995). D. S. Home, Steric effects in
the coagulation of casein micelles by ethanol,
Biopolymers23: 989 (1984). H. D. Goff and W. K. Jordan,
Action of emulsifiers in promoting fat destabilization
during the manufacture of ice cream, J. DairySci.72: 18
(1989). Y. Fang and D. G. Dalgleish, Casein adsorption on
the surfaces of oil-in-water emulsions modified by
lecithin, C o l l o i d s Su$ B 1:357 (1993). J.-L.
Courthaudon, E. Dickinson, and W. W. Christie, Competitive
adsorption of lecithin and p-casein in oil-in-water
emulsions, J . Agric.Food Chem.391365 (1991). D. E.
Graham and M. C. Phillips, Proteins at liquid interfaces
11. Adsorption isotherms, J. C o l l o i d Inte$ Sci.
70:415 (1979). P. Walstra, Effect of homogenization on
milk plasma, Neth.Milk DairyJ . 34:81 (1980). P. Walstra
and H. Oortwijn, The membranes of recombined fat globules.
3 . Mode of for- mation, Neth.Milk DairyJ . 36: 103 (1
982). A. W. M. Sweetsur and D. D. Muir, Effect of
homogenization on the heat stability of milk, J.
DairyRes.50:291 (1983). D. G. Dalgleish and E. W. Robson,
Coagulation of homogenized milk particles by rennet, J.
DairyRes.51:417 (1984). K . G. Berger, Ice cream, Food
Emulsions,2nd ed. ( K . Larsson and S. E. Friberg, eds.),
Marcel Dekker, New York, 1990, p. 367. D. S. Horne and
T. G. Parker, Factors affecting the ethanol stability of
bovine milk. 11. The origin of the pH transition, J.
DairyRes.48:285 (1981). P. Walstra, The syneresis of curd,
C h e e s e : C h e m i s t r y , Physicsand
Microbiology,2nd ed., Vol. 1 (P, F. Fox, ed.), Chapman
and Hall, London, 1993, p. 141. D. G. Dalgleish,
Proteolysis and aggregation of casein micelles treated with
immobilized or soluble chymosin, J. DairyRes.46:653
(1979). D. F. Darling and A. C. M. van Hooydonk,
Derivation of a mathematical model for the mechanism of
casein micelle coagulation by rennet, J. D a i r y
Res.48:189 (1981). J. Visser, A. Minihan, P. Smits, S. B.
Tjan, and I. Heertje, Effects of pH and temperature on the
milk salt system, Nerh. Milk DairyJ . 40:351 (1986). A.
C. M. van Hooydonk, H. G. Hagedoom, and L. J. Boemgter,
pH-induced physico- chemical changes of casein micelles in
milk and their effect on renneting. 1. Effect of acidifi-
cation on physico-chemical properties, Neth.Milk DairyJ .
40:281 (1986).
Structure-FunctionRelationshipsof W h e a t Proteins H. J.
Moss, C. W. Wrigley, F. MacRitchie, and P. J. Randall,
Sulfur and nitrogen fertilizer effects on wheat. 11.
Influence on grain quality, A u s t . J. A g r i c . R e
s . 32:213 (1981). J . G. Fullington, D. M. Miskelly, C.
W. Wrigley, and D. D. Kasarda, Quality-related endo- sperm
proteins in sulfur-deficient and normal wheat grain, J. C e
r e a l Sci.5:233 (1987). A. R. Wooding, R. J. Martin,
and F. MacRitchie, Effect of sulfur-nitrogen treatments on
work input requirements for dough mixing in a second
season, Proceedings of 44th Australian Cereal Chemistry
Conference, Royal Australian Chemical Institute, Melbourne,
1994, pp. 2 19-222. F. MacRitchie and R. B. Gupta,
Functionality-composition relationships of wheat flour as a
result of variation in sulfur availability, A u s t . J .
A g r i c . R e s . 44:1767 (1993). P. J. Randall and H.
J. Moss, Some effects of temperature regime during grain
filling on wheat quality, Austr.J. A g r i c . R e s .
41 :603 (1990). C. S. Blumenthal, E. W. R. Barlow, and C.
W. Wrigley, Growth environment and wheat quality, J. C e
r e a l S c i . 18:3 (1993). P. Stone and M. E.
Nicolas, Wheat cultivars vary widely in their responses of
grain yield and quality to short periods of post-anthesis
heat-stress, Austr.J. P l a n t P h i s i o l . 2 1
:887 (1994). J. E. Bernardin, S. C. Witt, and J. Milenic,
Effect of heat stress on the pattern of protein synthesis
in wheat endosperm, Proceedings of the 44th Australian
Cereal Chemistry Confer- ence (J. F. Panozzo and P. G.
Downie, eds.), Australia, 1994, p. 37. M. Ciaffi, L.
Tozzi, E. Cannarella, M. Corbellini, B. Borghi, and D.
Lafiandra, Effect of heat stress on gluten proteins and
dough technological properties, W h e a t Kernel P r o t
e i n s M o l e c u l a r a n d F u n c t i o n a l A s
p e c t s , S. Martino a1 Cimino, Viterbo, Italy, 1994, p.
277. F. MacRitchie, Studies of gluten from wheat flours, C
e r e a l FoodsWorld2 5 : 382 (1980). K. Chakraborty
and K. Khan, Biochemical and breadmaking properties of
wheat protein components. I. Compositional differences
revealed through quantitation and polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis of protein fractions from various isolation
procedures, C e r e a l Chern.6 5 : 333 (1988). F.
MacRitchie, Evaluation of contributions from wheat protein
fractions to dough mixing and breadmaking, J. C e r e a l
S c i 6:259 (1987). G. Lundh and F. MacRitchie, SE-HPLC
characterization of wheat protein fractions differing in
contributions to breadmaking quality, J. C e r e a l S c
i . 10:247 (1989). F . MacRitchie, D. D. Kasarda, and D.
D. Kuzmicky, Characterization of wheat protein frac- tions
differing in contributions to breadmaking quality, C e r e
a l C h e m . 68: 122 ( 1 99 1 ). R. J. Fido, F. Bekes,
P. W. Gras, and A. Tatham, Effects of gliadin subunits on
the dough- mixing properties of wheat flour, W h e a t
KernelP r o t e i n s : M o l e c u l a r a n d F u n c
t i o n a l A s p e c t s , University of Tuscia, 1994, pp.
305-307. F. Bekes, P. W. Gras, R. B. Gupta, D. R. Hickman,
and A. S. Tatham, Effects of a high Mr glutenin subunit (
1 Bx20), J. C e r e a l Sci.19:3 ( 1 994). N. K. Singh,
K. W. Shepherd, P. Langridge, and L. C. Gruen, Purification
and biochemical characterization of triticin, a
legume-like protein in wheat endosperm, J. C e r e a l S
c i . 13:207 (1991). J . A. D. Ewart, Comments on
recent hypotheses for glutenin, Food Chern.38:159 (1990).
G . J. Lawrence, F. MacRitchie, and C. W. Wrigley, Dough
and baking quality of wheat lines deficient in glutenin
subunits controlled by the G l u A l , G l u B I and G l
u D l loci, J. C e r e a l Sci. 7:109 (1988). Gupta, R.
B., MacRitchie, F., Shepherd, K. W. and Ellison, F.,
Relative contributions of LMW and HMW subunits to dough
strength and dough stickiness of bread wheat, Gluten
Proteins 1990 (W. Bushok and R. T. Katchuk, eds.). Am.
Assoc. Cereal Chem., St. Paul, 1991, pp. 7 1-80. M.
Ciaffi, D. Lafiandra, T. Turchetta, S. Ravaglia, H.
Bariana, R. B. Gupta, and F. MacRitchie, Breadmaking
potential of durum wheat lines expressing both x and
y-type subunits at the G l u A 1 locus, CerealC h e m .
72 :465 (1995). B. Margiotta, M. Urbano, G. Colaprico, E.
Johansson, F. Buonocore, R. D'Ovidio, and D. Lafiandra,
Bread wheat lines with both x- and y-type subunits at the
G l u A 1 locus, J . Cereal Sci 23:203 (1 996). R. B.
Gupta, J. G. Paul, G. B. Cornish, G. A. Palmer, F. Bekes,
and A. J. Rathjen, Allelic variation at glutenin subunit
and gliadin loci, G l u 1 , G l u 3 and G l i I , of
common wheats. I. Its additive and interaction effects on
dough properties, J . CerealSci.19:9 (1994). A. S.
Dhaliwal and F. MacRitchie, Contributions of protein
fractions to dough handling properties of wheatlrye
translocation cultivars, J . CerealSci.12 :1 13 (1990).
F. MacRitchie, Physicochemical processes in mixing, C h e m
i s t r y andPhysics(8 Baking(J. M. V. Blanshard, P. J.
Frazier, and T. Galliard, eds.), Royal Society of
Chemistry, London, 1986, pp. 132-146. P. J. Flory,
Tensile strength in relation to molecular weight of high
polymers, J . A m . C h e m . S o c . 67:2048 ( 1 945).
B. H. Bersted and T. G. Anderson, Influence of molecular
weight and molecular weight distribution on the tensile
properties of amorphous polymers, J . Appl.Phys.55 5 7 2
(197 1 ). P. G. DeGennes, Reptation of a polymer chain in
the presence of fixed obstacles, J . C h e m . Phys.55:572
(1971). Y . Termonia and P. Smith, Kinetic model for
tensile deformation of polymers. I. Effect of molecular
weight, Macromolecules20:835 (1987). K.-G. Wahlund, M.
Gustavsson, F. MacRitchie, T. Nylander, and L.
Wannerberger, Size char- acterization of wheat proteins,
particularly glutenins, by asymmetrical flow field-flow
frac- tionation, J . CerealS c i 23 :1 1 3 (1996). F.
MacRitchie, Physicochemical properties of wheat proteins in
relation to functionality, Adv. Food Nutr: Re.r. 3 6 : 1
(1992). N. K. Singh, G. R. Donovan. and F. MacRitchie, Use
of sonication and size-exclusion high performance liquid
chromatography in the study of wheat flour proteins. 11.
Relative quantity of glutenin as a measure of breadmaking
quality, CerealC h e m . 67:161 (1990).
11 11. Structure and Functionality of Egg
Proteins
47.
48.
49.
SO.
5 1 .
52.
p. 149.
14 14. Genetic Engineering of Food
Proteins
C h e m i s t r y of f i o d s atzd B e ~ l e r a g e s R
e c e n t D e v e l o p m e n t s (G. Charalambous and G.
Inglett,
P r o t e i n a n d Protein-PolysaccharideM i c r o p a r
t i c l e s 527 P. Paquin, Y. Lebeuf, J. P. Richard, and
M. Kalab, Microparticulation of milk proteins by high
pressure homogenization to produce a fat substitute,
Proteina n d Fat G l o b u l e M o d $ c a t i o n s b y
H e a t T r e a t m e n t , Homogerzizationa n d O t h e
r T e c h n o l o g i c a l Meurzs f o r H i g h Q u u
l i p D a i y P r o d u c t s , Special Issue no. 9303,
International Dairy Federation, Brussels, 1993, pp.
389-396. A. J. McCar~hy and J. W. Maegli, Protein fat
replacer and method of manufacture thereof, U.S. Patent
5,350.590, Beatreme Foods Inc. (1994). M. Habib and J. S.
Podolski, Concentrated. substantially non-aggregated casein
micelles as a fatlcream substitute, European Patent
Application 0,345,226, Nutrasweet Co. (1989). I. Hayakawa,
Y. Yamada, and Y. Fujio, Microparticulation by jet mill
grinding of protein powders and effects on hydrophobicity,
J . Food S c i . 58:1026 (1993). A. M. Hem~ansson,
Aggregation and denaturation involved in gel formation,
Furzctionulity a n d P r o t e i n S t r u c t u r e (A.
Pour-El, ed.), American Chemical Society, Washington, DC,
1979, p. 81. A. Kilara and T. Y. Sharkasi, Effects of
temperature on food proteins and its implications on
functional properties, CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.
23:323 (1986). P. R. Khun and E. A. Foegeding, Mineral
salt effects on whey protein gelation, J . A g r i c .
Food C h e m . 39:1013 (1991). Y. L. Xiong. Influence of
pH and ionic environment on thermal aggregation of whey
proteins. J . A g r i c . Food C h e m . 40:380 (1992).
N. Kitabake and E. Doi, Improvement of protein and gel by
physical and enzymatic treatment, Food R e v Irv.9:445
(1993). A. J. Steventon, L. F. Gladden, and P. J. Fryer,
A percolation analysis of the concentration dependence of
the gelation of whey protein concentrates, J . TextureS t
u d . 22:201 (1991). A. M. Hermansson, Physico-chemical
aspects of soy proteins structure formation. J. Texture S
t u d . 9 3 3 ( 1 9 7 8 ) . P. Jelen and W. Buchheim,
Stability of whey protein upon heating in acidic
conditions, M i l c h w i s s e r ~ . ~ c h r I f i 39:2
15 (1984). J. Patocka. M.Drathen, and P. Jelen. Heat
stability of isolated whey protein fractions in highly
acidic conditions, M i l c h u i s s e n s c h a f r
42:700 (1987). N. S. Singer, J. Latella, and S. Yamamoto.
Protein product. European Patent Application 0,323,529,
John Labatt Ltd. (1989). P. Pradipasena and C. Rha.
Pseudoplastic and rheopectic properties of a globular
protein (P-lactoglobulin) solution, J . Te.uture S t u d
. 8:3 1 1 . Y. C. Ker and R. T. Toledo, Influence of shear
treatments on consistency and gelling properties of whey
protein isolate suspensions. J . Food S c i . 57:82
(1992). A. J. Steventon, Thermal aggregation of whey
proteins, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cam- bridge,
Cambridge, 1993. S. M. Taylor and P. J. Fryer, The effect
of temperaturelshear history on the thermal gelation of
whey protein concentrates, Food H y d r o c o l l o i d s
8:45 (1994). J . M. Aguilera, Y. L. Xiong, and J. E.
Kinsella. Viscoelastic properties of mixed dairy gels,
Food R e s . Irit. 26: 11 (1 993). J. Visser and M. A.
Bakker, Edible plastic compositions, European Patent
Application 0.347,237. Unilever NV (1989). T. Hori.
Effects of freezing and thawing green curds on the
rheological properties of cream cheese, J . Food S c i .
4 7 : 18 1 1 (1982). C. Sanchez, J. L. Beauregard, M. H.
Chassagne, J. J. Bimbenet, and J. Hardy. Rheological and
textural behaviour of Double cream cheese. Part 2: Effect
of curd cooling rate, J. Food Eng. 23595 (1994). M. S.
Miller, Proteins as fat substitutes, ProteinF u n c t i o n
a l i h irz Food Sy.sret?zs (N. S. Het- tiarachchy and G.
R. Ziegler, eds.). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1994, p.
435. N. S. Singer and J. M. Dunn. Protein
microparticulation process: The principle and the process,
J . A m . C o l l . Nut,:9:388 (1990). A. Drewnoski,
Sensory properties of fats and fat replacements, Nut,:Re\:
5 0 : 17 (1992). G. V. Civille, The sensory properties
of products made with microparticulated protein, J . A m .
C o l l . Nut,: 9427 (1990). F . W. Wood, An approach to
understanding creaminess, DieStiirke2 6 : 127 (1974). S.
A. Matz, Unctuous foods, Food T u t u r e , Avi,
Westport, CT, 1962, p. 126. J. P. Schirle-Keller, H. H.
Chang, and G. A. Reineccius, Interaction of flavor
compounds with microparticulated proteins, J . Food S c
i . 5 7 : 1448 (1992). S. Nakai, Importance of protein
functionality in improving food quality: Roles of
hydrophobic interaction, C o m m e n t s A g r i c .
Food C h r m . h:339 (1992). T. Y. Hung and D. M. Smith,
Dynamic rheological properties and microstructure of
partially insolubilized whey protein concentrate gels, J
. FoodS c i . 5 8 : 1047 (1993). B. C. Beuschel, J. A.
Partridge, and D. M. Smith, Insolubilized whey protein
concentrate andlor chicken salt-soluble protein gel
properties. J . Food S c i . 57:852 (1992a). M . E.
Mangino, Properties of whey protein concentrates, W h e y
L I I Z ~ L a c t o s e Proc.essing (J. G . Zadow,
ed.), Elsevier, London, 1992, p. 232. K. P. Das and J. E.
Kinsella, Effect of heat denaturation on the adsorption of
P-lactoglobulin at the oillwater interface and on the
coalescence stability of emulsions, J . C o l l o i d I n
t e r / k c e S c i . 1 3 9 : 5 5 1 (1990). M. Britten
and H. J. Giroux, Emulsifying properties of whey protein
and casein composite blends, J . D u i q S c i . 72:33
18 (199 1 ) . E. Dickinson and S. T. Hong, Surface coverage
of /3-lactolobulin at the oiltwater interface: Influence
of protein heat treatment and various emulsifiers. J .
Axric,.Food Chern.42:1602 (1994). H. Zhu and S.
Damodaran, Heat-induced conformational changes in whey
protein isolate and its relation to foaming properties. J
. A g r i c . Food C h e m . 42:X46 (1994). H. Singh,
P. F. Fox, and M. Cuddigan, Emulsifying properties of
protein fractions prepared from heated milk, Food C h e t
n . 47: 1 (1993). M. Britten. H. J. Giroux, Y. Jean. and
N. Rodrigue, Composite blends from heot-denatured and
undenatured whey protein: Emulsifying properties. Ir!t
DniryJ . 4:25 (1994). B. C. Beuschel, J. D. Culbertson.
J. A. Partridge. and D. M. Smith, Gelation and emulsifi-
cation properties of partially insolubilized whey protein
concentrates, .I. Food S c i . 57:605 (199%). W.
Buchheim and W. Hoffman. Microparticulated proteins a\ fat
substitutes. E ~ r r o p . D a i n M a g . 6 3 0 (1994).
K . Schmidt, A. Lundy, J. Reynolds. and L. N. Yee,
Carbohydrate or protein based fat mini- icker effects on
ice milk properties, J . FoodSci. 58.76 1(199.1). R. C.
Lawrence, Incorporation of whey proteins in cheese.
Fuc.tor.s A f f e c r i ~ l g t h e Yield o f C h e e s e
, Special Issue no. 9301, International Dairy Federation.
Brussels. 1993, pp. 79-8 1. C. Sanchez, J. L. Beauregard,
M. H. Chassagne. A. Duquenoy, and J . Hardy. Effect of
proc- essing on rheology and stability of double cream
cheese, Food Kes.Itrt. (in press). C . Sanchez, J. L.
Beauregard. J . J. Bimbenet. and J. Hardy, Rheological
properties of double cream cheese containing whey protein
concentrate, J. Food S c i . . (in press).
18 18. Edible Protein Films and Coatings
films is available.
ration techniques.
E x t r a c t i o n o f M i l k Proteins593 J. P.
Rialland and J. P. Barbier, ProcCdC de traitement du lait
par une rCsine Cchangeuse de cations en vue de la
fabrication de la casCine et du IactosCrum, Patent FR 2
480 568 (1980). A. Pierre and M. Douin, Elements d'etude
du procCdC Bride1 de fabrication de caseine a partir de
lait dCcationisC par Cchanges d'ions (EI), h i t 64521
(1984). Laiteries Hubert Triballat, ProcCdC et
installation pour la preparation de la caseine a partir du
lait et produits ainsi obtenus, Patent FR 2 418 626 (1979).
R. Noel (SocietC Vidaubanaise d'lngenierie), ProcCdC de
separation du phosphocasCinate de calcium et du
1actosCrum d'un lait CcrCmC et plus genkralement d'un
composC protCique d'un liquide biologique, Patent PCT WO
921 12642 (1992). D. A. Lonergan, Isolation of casein by
ultrafiltration and cryodestabilization, J. Food S c i .
48:1817 (1983). M. M. Hewedi, D. M. Mulvihill, and P. F.
Fox, Recovery of milk protein by ethanol precip- itation,
I t : J. Food S c i . Technol.9 : 1 1 (1 985). J. L.
Maubois, J. Fauquant, and G. BrulC (INRA). ProcCde de
traitement de matikres contenant des protkines telles que
le lait, Patent FR 2 292 435 (1976). G. BrulC, J.
Fauquant, and J. L. Maubois, Preparation of native
phosphocaseinate by com- bining membrane ultrafiltration
and ultracentrifugation, J. D a i r y S c i . 62:869
(1979). J . Fauquant, J . L. Maubois, and A. Pierre.
Microfiltration du lait sur membrane minCrale, Tech.h i t
. 1028:21 (1988). A. Pierre, J . Fauquant, Y. Le Graet,
M. Piot, and J. L. Maubois, Preparation de phosphoca-
skinate natif par microfiltration sur membrane, Lait72 :46
1 (1992). P. Schuck, M. Piot, S. MCjean, Y. LeGraet, J.
Fauquant, G. BrulC, and J . L. Maubois, DC- shydration
par atomisation de phosphocasCinate natif obtenu par
microfiltration sur membrane, Lait74 :375 (1 994). J. P.
Quiblier, C. Ferron-Baumy, G. Garric, and J. L. Maubois
(INRA), ProcCdC de traitement des laits permettant au
moins de conserver leur aptitude fromagere. Patent FR 2 681
218 A1 (1991). M. El Shiekh, P. Ducruet, and J . L.
Maubois, Manufacture of Ras cheese from fresh and
recombined milks, h i t 74:297 (1994). E. TerrC, J. L.
Maubois, G. BrulC, and A. Pierre (INRA), Procede
d'obtention d'une matiere enrichie en caseine beta,
appareillage pour la mise en oeuvre de ce procCdC et
application des produits obtenus par ce procCdC comme
aliments, complCments alimentaires ou additifs en
industrie alimentaire et pharmaceutique ou dans la
prkparation de peptides a activite phy- siologique. Patent
Fr 2 592 769 A l (1987). J. M. Murphy and P. F. Fox,
Fractionation of sodium caseinate by ultrafiltration, Food
Chern. 39:27 (1991). M. H. Famelart. C. Hardy. and G.
BrulC, Etude des facteurs d'extraction de la caseine beta,
Lait69:47 11989). C. Le Magnen and J. J. Maugas (EURIAL).
Method and device for obtaining beta casein, Patent
PCT./FR 9 1100506 (1 99 1 ) . M. Pouliot. Y. Pouliot, M.
Britten, J . L. Maubois, and J . Fauquant, Study of the
dissociation of beta-casein from native phosphocaseinate,
Luit74:325 (1994). L. Hambraeus, Nutritional aspects of
milk proteins, A d v a n c e d D a i p C h e m i s t r y
, Vol.I :P r o t e i n s (P. F. Fox, ed.), Elsevier,
London, 1992, p. 457. P. G . Marshall, W. L. Dunkley,
and E. Lowe, Fractionation and concentration of whey by
reverse osmosis, J . Food Technol.2 2 :969 (1968). R.
R. Zall, Sources and composition of whey and permeate, W h
e x a n d L u c t o s e Processing ( J . G . Zadow,
ed.), Elsevier, London, 1992, p. 1. G. Brule, E. Real del
Sol. J . Fauquant, and C. Fiaud, Mineral salts stability
in aqueous phase of milk: influence of heat treatment, J.
D a i n S c i . 61: 1225 (1978). M. E. Matthews,
Advances in whey processing-ultrafiltration and reverse
osmosis, N. Z. J. Dai-S c i . Technol.14 :86 (1979). a u
b o i s andOllivier R. F. Armishaw, Inorganic fouling of
membranes during ultrafiltraton of casein whey, N . Z. J.
D a i r y S c i . T e c h n o l . 17:213 (1982). K. J.
Burgess and J. Kelly, Technical note: selected functional
properties of a whey protein isolate, X Food.T e c h n o
l . 14:325 (1979). D. E. Palmer. Recovery of proteins
from food factory waste by ion exchange, Food P r o t e i n
s (P. F. Fox and J. J. Condon, eds.), Applied Science
Publishers, London, 1982, p. 341. R. J. Pearce, Whey
processing, W h e y a n d L a c t o s e P r o c e s s i
n g (J. G. Zadow, ed.), Elsevier, London, 1992, p. 73.
B. Mirabel, Nouveau procede d'extraction des proteines du
lactoserum, A n n . Nutr.A l i m m t . 32 :243 (1978). P.
J. Skudder, Evaluation of a porous silica-based
ion-exchange medium for the production of protein
fractions from rennet- and acid-whey, J. D a i n R e s .
52: 167 (1985). C. M. Barker and C. V. Morr, Composition
and properties of Spherosil-QMA whey protein concentrate,
J . Food.S c i . 51 :919 (1986). D. M. Mulvihill,
Production, functional properties and utilization of milk
protein products, A d v a n c e d D a i y C h e m i s t
r y , V o l . I : P r o t e i n s (P. F. Fox, ed.),
Elsevier, London, 1992, p. 349. D. N. Lee and R. L.
Merson, Prefiltration of cottage cheese whey to reduce
fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Food S c i . 41
:403 (1976). U. Merin, S. Gordin, and G. B. Tanny.
Microfiltration of sweet cheese whey, N.Z. J. D a i r y S c
i . T e c h n o l . 18: 153 (1983). M. Piot, J. L.
Maubois, P. Schaegis, R. Veyre, and A. Luccioni,
Microfiltration en flux tan- gentiel des IactosCrums de
fromagerie, h i t 64 :102 (1984). J. Fauquant, E. Vieco,
G. BrulC, and J. L. Maubois. Clarification des IactosCrums
doux par agregation thermocalcique de la matikre grasse
risiduelle, Luir 65 :1 (1985). J. L. Maubois, A. Pierre,
J. Fauquant, and M. Piot, Industrial fractionation of main
whey proteins, B u l l . Fed.Inr. h i t . 212 :154
(1987). A. Pierre, Y. Le Graet, G. Daufin, F. Michel, and
G. Gesan, Whey microfiltration perform- ance: influence of
protein concentration by ultrafiltration and of
physicochemical pretreat- ment, L u i t 74:65 (1994).
G. Dautin, J. P. LabbC, A. Quemerais, F. Michel, and U.
Merin. Optimizing clarified whey ultrafiltration:
influence of pH, J . D a i n R e s . 61 :355 (1994).
D.-C. Hwang and S. Damodaran, Selective precipitation and
removal of lipids from cheese whey using chitosan, J . A
g r i c . Food Chern.43 :33 (1995). M. E. Mangino,
Properties of whey protein concentrates, W h e y ~ ~ n d
LucroseP r o c e s s i n g (J. G. Zadow. ed.), Elsevier,
London, 1992, p. 23 I. J. E. Kinsella, Relationship
between structure and functional properties of food
proteins, Food Proteins (P. F. Fox and J. J. Condon,
eds.), Applied Science Publishers. London. 1982, p. 5 1.
P. Gault, M. Mahaut, and J . Korolczuk, CaractCristiques
rheologiques et gelification themque du concentre de
proteines de lactoserum, h i t 70:217 (1990). S. Y. Liao
and M. E. Mangino, Characterization of the composition,
physicochemical and functional properties of acid whey
protein concentrates, J. Food.S c i . 52:1033 (1987). R.
Aschaffenburg and J. Drewry, Improved method for the
preparation of crystalline P lactoglobulin and
a-lactalbumin from cow's milk, B i o c h e m i s t n
65:273 (1957). J. L. Maubois, Chromatographie des
proteines du IactosCrum de brebis, A n n . B i o l . A n
i m . Biochirn.B i o p h y s . 4 :295 (1964). P.
Mailliart and B. Ribadeau Dumas, Preparation of
beta-lactoglobulin-free proteins from whey retentate by
NaCl salting out at low pH, J. Food S c i . 53:743 (1988).
T . Kaneko, B. T. Wu, and S. Nakai, Selective
concentration of bovine immunoglobulins and a-lactalbumin
from acid whey using FeCI,, 3. Food S c i . 50: 1531
(1985). T. Kuwata, H. Ohtomo, E. Hori, and Y. Yamarnoto,
Effects of defatting and desalting on heat stability of
whey protein concentrate, N i p p o n ShokiihitlK o g y o
G u k k n i s h i 32:493 (1985). i l k Proteins595 J.
L. Maubois, Separation, extraction and fractionation of
milk protein components, Lair 64:485 (1984). R . J.
Pearce, Thermal separation of P-lactoglobulin and
a-lactalbumin in bovine Cheddar cheese whey, A u s t .
J. D a i r y T e c h n o l . 38:144 (1983). R. J.
Pearce, Fractionation of whey proteins, B u l l . Fed. I
n t . h i t . 212:150 (1987). C. Bramaucl, P. Aimar, and
G. Daufin, Thermal isoelectric precipitation of
a-lactalbumin from a whey protein concentrate: influence
of protein-calcium complexation, B i o t e c h n o l . B i
o e n g . 47: 121 (1995). J. L. Maubois, Whey, its
biotechnological signification, Proceedings of the 8th
International Biotechnology Symposium, July 17-22, Paris,
France, 1988, pp. 8 17-824. B. D. Shur, Alpha-lactalbumin
contraceptive, Patent PCT WO 84104457 (1984). J. P.
Perraudin, Protkines a activites biologiques: lactofenine
et lactoperoxydase. Connais- sances recernment acquises et
technologies d'obtention, Lair 71 :19 1 (199 1 ). G. Brule,
L. Roger, J. Fauquant. and M. Piot (INRA), ProcedC de
traitement d'une matiere premiere a base de casCine,
contenant des phosphocasCinates de cations bivalents.
Produits obtenus et applications, Patent FR 8 002 280
(1980). M. Tanimoto, Y. Y. N. Kawasaki, H. Shinmoto, S.
Dosako, and A. Tomizawa, (Snow Brand), Process for
producing kappa-casein glycomacropeptides, Patent EP 0 393
850 A2 (1990). S. Beucher, F. Levenez, M. Yvon, and T.
Coring, Effects of gastric digestive products from casein
on CCK release by intestinal cells in rat, J. Nutr: B i o
c h e m . 5 5 7 8 (1994). J . L. Maubois and J. Leonil,
Peptides du lait a activitC biologique, Lait69:245 (1989).
D. D. Kitts and Y. Yuan, Caseinophosphopeptides and
calcium bioavailability, T r e n d s Food S c i . T e c h
n o l . 3:3 1 (1992). S. Maruyama, H. Mitachi, H. Tanaka,
N. Tomizuka. and H. Susuki, Studies on the active site and
antihypertensive activity of angiotensin I-converting
enzyme inhibitors derived from ca- sein, A g r i c .
Biol.C h e m . 51 :1581 (1987). P. Jollks, S.
Levy-Toledano, A. M. Fiat, C. Soria, D. Gillessen, A.
Thamaidis, F. W. Dunn, and J. P. Caen, Analogy between
fibrinogen and casein. Effect of an undecapeptide isolated
from K-casein on platelet function, Eur: J. B i o c h e m
. 158:379 (1986). E . Laffineur, Activite
immunomodulatrice i n vitrode composCs produits par la
fermentation lactique d'un substrat derive du lait, Ph.D.
thesis, ENSA. Rennes, France, 1994. F. Parker, D.
Migliore-Samour, F. Floc'h, A. Zerial, G. H. Werner, J.
Jolles, M. Casaretto. H. Zahn, and P. Jollks,
Immunostimulating hexapeptide from human casein: amino acid
se- quence, synthesis and biological properties, Eur: J.
B i o c h e m . 145:677 (1984). J . Leonil, D. Molle,
and J. L. Maubois, Study of the early stages of tryptic
hydrolysis of P -casein, Lair 68:281 (1988).
21 21. Chemical and Physical Methods for
the Characterization of Proteins
and nutritionists.
A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S