Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Guttmacher Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
International Family Planning Perspectives
nomic, social and educational conditions, At the same time, our measure of mar- terval for which the change in age at mar-
published by the United Nations, the Unit- riage timing has drawbacks, particularly riage is described.22
ed Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cul-its exclusion of entry into socially recog-
tural Organization and the World Bank. nized, noncohabiting unions (visiting Quality of Data
unions, for example).* Moreover, defining The standard DHS survey asks each
Measurement Issues the beginning of union involvement in woman to provide the month and year she
Because we are interested in the conse- terms of cohabitation may be too restric- started living with her first husband or
quences of long-term, socially recognized tive for some parts of Sub-Saharan Africa male partner. If a woman cannot provide
unions for reproduction, women's health where marriage is a process rather than a at least the year of the first union, she is
and women's status, we define marriage discrete event.20 For example, a visiting asked how old she was at the beginning of
broadly to include both consensual or co- sexual relationship may precede the be- this union.23t When the proportions ever-
habiting unions and formal marriages. ginning of cohabitation and a first birth married in the DHS surveys are compared
Age at first union is defined here as the age may occur before cohabitation or mar- with external data, either these sources
at which the respondent first started liv- riage. In this respect, our measure is like- agree or the DHS shows higher propor-
ing with her husband or male partner. The ly to understate the true prevalence of tions married because of its more inclusive
measure is calculated from questions in early unions that influence reproduction definition of marriage. Nonetheless, we
every DHS survey asking women for the and women's status. Yet, given the wide- find some evidence of missing data, round-
month and year when they first started ly varying forms that socially recognized ing and heaping, and age misreporting.
living with their husband or partner and unions take in the countries and regions In nearly all of the countries under in-
the age at which they did so. under investigation, we consider our mea- vestigation, the proportion of women who
Insofar as we are concerned with re- sure the most suitable one available for could give neither the year of their first
production-related risks, defining union this comparative research. union nor their age at first union was quite
involvement as cohabitation is a refine- In our examination of population sub- low-usually less than 1%.24 Because the
ment over traditional measures based on groups, our measure of urban residence proportion imputed is in general very low,
definitions of marriage as religiously or refers to the woman's current place of res- this should not affect the estimates pre-
legally sanctioned marriages. For exam- idence. Our measure of exposure to formal sented here to any significant degree.
ple, in a few Asian countries (especially schooling is a dichotomous variable that However, there were a few exceptions. In
Bangladesh and India), cohabitation often distinguishes women with some sec- Mali, 25% of women were unable to pro-
begins well after the formal marriage. In ondary education (i.e., seven or more years vide either the year of their first union or
Latin America, as in France and the Unit- of formal schooling) from women withtheir less age at first union, and 9% of women
ed States, consensual or cohabiting unions education.t Regrettably, only the early in Guatemala could not provide either
are socially recognized and a substantial DHS surveys collected information on piece of information. To impute the age at
proportion of couples are in such unions.19 labor force participation prior to marriage, first union for these women, the DHS as-
In Sub-Saharan Africa, cohabiting unions limiting our ability to examine this factor. sumed that the first union occurred in a
are also common, and the DHS question At the country level, our measure of range between some minimum age (usu-
is likely to have captured these unions as early marriage is the proportion of womenally 12) and a point at least seven months
well as formal marriages. married by age 20. Our measure of ur- prior to the birth of their first child. Since
banization is the proportion of the popu- imputation depended on the age at first
*The sole exception is Trinidad and Tobago, where lation living in urban areas and our mea- birth, the bias is toward an age at first mar-
women were specifically asked about visiting unions, a
recognized type of union in that country.
sure of women's education, the proportion riage that is older than the actual age.
of women aged 20-24 with at least some The data for women who provided the
tWe considered using a more detailed measure of educa-
secondary schooling. We also include in year of the first marriage suggest some
tional attainment that distinguished between women with
no education, those with an incomplete primary educa- the aggregate analysis a measure of heaping on rounded numbers (O or 5), es-
tion, those with a complete primary education and those women's relative access to education, pecially
the in Latin America. This propensi-
with some secondary schooling. However, in several of number of girls per 100 boys in secondary ty to round may be more common in Latin
the Sub-Saharan African countries under investigation
school. We examine the prevalence of America because of the high prevalence
(e.g., Burundi and Niger), there are too few educated
women to permit analysis within more detailed educa- early marriage in relation to two measures of informal first unions. These unions tend
tional attainment categories (e.g., the proportion of women of female labor force participation-the to be temporary, and their beginnings may
aged 20-24 with complete primary education who mar- proportion of women who are in the labor be more difficult to recall because they are
ried before age 18). For most of the Latin American coun-
force21 and the proportion of women agednot usually marked by any social or reli-
tries under investigation, we encounter the opposite sit-
uation; there are too few women at the low end of the 20-29 who reported in the DHS survey gious ceremony.25
distribution to use the four-category classification scheme. that they were currently working. Finally, there is also some indication that
tSeveral countries deviated slightly from this standard
We also analyze the association between women in the oldest age-groups (those
format (see A. K. Blanc and N. Rutenberg, 1990, reference change in the proportion married by age aged 40-44 in the current analysis) over-
23). Interviewers in the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, In- 20 and two measures of socioeconomic stated their age at first union. Again, this
donesia, Peru and Thailand asked all ever-married women
change. The first is change in the propor- pattern is most noticeable in areas where
for both the date of the beginning of their first union and
their age at the time. Inconsistencies were resolved via
tion of women with some secondary informal and consensual unions are com-
"subjective and largely unrecorded decisions...based on schooling, based on the same age-groups mon. Age misreporting is most likely to
the survey staff's opinion about which was the more re- for which change in marital timing is mea- influence our analysis of change over time;
liable piece of information" (p. 43). In Mexico, only the sured (women aged 20-24 and 40-44). The specifically, older respondents' age mis-
question on the date of first union was asked. This appears
second is the change in the proportion of reporting is likely to lead us to understate
to have produced more complete information because in-
terviewers had to probe more intensively to colect a com- the population that is urban from 1965 to the actual amount of change in the preva-
plete date for the first union from each respondent. 1990, a period that approximates the in- lence of early marriage.26
Latin America
Socioeconomic Correlates Bolivia 43 49 41 2 0 100
Next, we examine the empirical linkages Brazil
be- 44 35 39 5 100 0
Colombia 42 42 37 5 0 100
tween marriage timing and three dimen-
Dominican Republic 63 54 47 16 56 44
sions of socioeconomic development- Ecuador 50 49 44 6 17 83
urbanization, women's educational attain- El Salvador 58 57 59 0* na na
portion is this low in half of the countries, while in the rather than an older *r<0.15; includes a few countries where correlation is not significant at p<.05. tr=0.15-0.29;
other half, about 10-15% of 30-34-year-olds had never
group (for example, all correlations significant at p<.05. tr=0.30-0.60; all correlations significant at p.<05. Note:
married. In Latin America, the proportion never-married Bangladesh and India, whose data files were not yet available, are omitted. Source: Special
in this age-group was 10% or less in all but three coun- women aged 40-44 or analyses of Demographic and Health Survey data.
tries, where the proportion varied between 10% and 16%. 45-49) permits us to ex-
closely: The majority of married women of the Quality of Data in 41 WFS Surveys: A Comparative Ap-
26, Washington, D. C., 1979.
proach, World Fertility Survey Comparative Studies, No.
have their first child within 24 months of 10. Ibid.
44, International Statistical Institute, Voorburg, The
the start of the first union.40 Still, the ris- Netherlands, 1985, p. 23.
11. J. C. Caldwell, "Toward a Restatement of Demo-
ing prevalence of sexual relationships and
graphic Transition Theory," Population and Development 26. Ibid.; A. K. Blanc and N. Rutenberg, 1990, op. cit. (see
childbearing outside of marriage means Review, 2:321-366,1976. reference 23); and A. J. Gage, 1995, op. cit. (see reference
that the implications of age at first mar- 23).
12. S. J. Jejeebhoy, "Women's Education, Autonomy, and
riage or union are changing. Reproductive Behavior: Assessing What We Have 27. AGI, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 1), Appendix Table 5.
In summary, information on changes in Learned," paper prepared for the workshop on Status of
28. I. Timaeus and W. Graham, "Labor Circulation, Mar-
the prevalence of early marriage and on Women and Demographic Change: Assessing What We Have
riage and Fertility in Southem Africa," in R. J. Lesthaeghe,
their implications for women can help pol- Learned, East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, Dec.
ed., Reproduction and Social Organization in Sub-Saharan
18-20,1995; and UN, Women's Education and Fertility Be-
icymakers and service providers recognize Africa, University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.,
havior: Recent Evidencefrom the Demograhic and Health Sur-
that action is needed, and can motivate veys, New York, 1995.
USA, 1989, pp. 365-400; C. H. Bledsoe and B. Cohen, op.
cit. (see reference 14); and B. B. Brown, "The Impact of
them to formulate timely and adequate re-
13. P. C. Smith, "The Impact of Age at Marriage and Pro- Male Labor Migration on Women in Botswana," African
sponses. Regulations, policies and pro- portions Marrying on Fertility," in R. A. Bulatao and R. D. Affairs, 82:367-388,1983.
grams must be adapted to ensure that Lee, eds., Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries:
29. A. K. Blanc and N. Rutenberg, 1990, op. cit. (see ref-
young women have as much access as Fertility Regulation and Institutional Influences, Academ-
erence 23), pp. 48-50.
young men to formal education and to ic Press, New York, 1983.
30. R. Anker, "Female Labour Force Activity in Devel-
paid employment. This calls for rethink- 14. Ibid.; and C. H. Bledsoe and B. Cohen, eds., Social Dy-
oping Countries: A Critique of Current Data Collection
ing how scarce resources are spent. At the namics of Adolescent Fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa, National
Techniques," International Labour Review, 122:709-723,
Academy Press, Washington, D. C., 1993.
same time, the social and health risks to 1983.
young women that accompany tradition- 15. P. C. Smith, 1983, op. cit. (see reference 13).
31. UN, Fertility Behaviour in the Context of Development:
al patterns of early union formation and 16. Ibid.; and N. Goldman, "Demography of the Mar- Evidence from the World Fertility Survey, New York, 1987
early childbearing, and the different, but riage Market in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia," in
32. F. I. Chowdhury and F. Trovato, "The Role and Sta-
equally troubling risks that may accom- International Population Conference, New Delhi 1989, Vol.
tus of Women and the Timing of Marriage in Five Asian
3, International Union for the Scientific Study of Popu-
pany increases in the age at marriage, Countries," Journal of Comparative Family Studies,
lation, Liege, Belgium, 1989, pp. 175-187
must be addressed and minimized. 25:143-157, 1994.
17. Special tabulations provided by H. Leridon and L.
33. AGI, Sexual Relationships and Marriage Worldwide,
Toulemon, Institut National d'Etudes Demographiques,
References Women, Families and the Future series, New York, 1995.
Paris.
1. The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), Hopes and Re-
34. Economist, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 6).
alities: Closing the Gap Between Women's Aspirations and 18. Special tabulations provided by M. Atoh, R. Kaneko
Their Reproductive Experiences, New York, 1995, Appen-and T. Kaneko, Institute of Population Problems, Min- 35. P McDonald, "Social Organization and Nuptiality
dix Table 5, pp. 48-49; and C. F. Westoff, A. K. Blanc and istry of Health and Welfare, Tokyo. in Developing Societies," in J. Cleland and J. Hobcraft,
L. Nyblade, Marriage and Entry into Parenthood, DHS Com- eds., Reproductive Change in Developing Countries, Oxford
parative Studies, No. 10, Macro International Inc., Calver-
19. AGI, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 1), Table E, p. 17
University Press, London, 1985, pp. 87-114.
ton, Md., USA, 1994. 20. R. J. Magnani et al., "Men, Marriage and Fatherhood
36. D. M. Upchurch and J. McCarthy, "The Timing of First
2. G. T. F. Acsadi and G. Johnson-Acsadi, Optimum Con- in Kinshasa, Zaire," International Family Planning Per-
Birth and High School Completion," American Sociolog-
spectives, 21:19-25, 1995; and J. R. Udry, N. Dole and K.
ditions for Childbearing, International Planned Parenthood ical Review, 55:224-234,1990.
Federation, London, 1986; and J. Hobcraft, "Child Spac-Gleiter, "Forming Reproductive Unions in Urban Zim-
babwe," International Family Planning Perspectives,
ing and Child Mortality," in Proceedings of the Demographic 37. AGI, Sex and America's Teenagers, New York, 1994, p. 7
and Health Surveys World Conference, 1991, Vol. 2, Co-18:10-12 & 17, 1992. 38. L. Rosero-Bixby, "Nuptiality Trends and Fertility
lumbia, Md., USA, 1991, pp. 1157-1182.
21. World Bank, World Tables 1995, Washington, D. C., Transition in Latin America," in J. M. Guzman et al., eds.,
3. S. Singh and D. Wulf, Today's Adolescents, Tomorrow's 1995, pp. 132-746. (continued on page 175)
Early Marriage... la mayoria de los paises y alcanza a 30-40 pun- d 24 ans sont moins susceptibles de s'e^tre mar-
(continued from page 157) tos porcentuales en algunos lugares. La edu- iees avant l'age de 20 ans que celles de 40 d 44
The Fertility Transition in Latin America, Oxford Univer- cacio'n y la edad de la mujer en el momento de ans. La difference, d'au moins 10% dans la plu-
sity Press, London, 1996, pp. 135-150. su primer matrimonio son factores es- part des pays, atteint jusqu'd 30% et 40% dans
39. R. J. Magnani et al., 1995, op. cit. (see reference 20);
trechamente vinculados tanto a nivel indi- certains. Le niveau d'education et l'aige au pre-
vidual
and J. Bruce, C. B. Lloyd and A. Leonard, 1995, op. cit. (see como a nivel de la sociedad: la mujer quemier mariage pre'sentent une association
reference 4). ha asistido a estudios secundarios es consid- etroite, au niveau tant individuel que societal.
40. AGI, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 1), Table 5. erablemente menos proclive a contraer matri- Ainsi, les femmes instruites au niveau sec-
monio durante su adolescencia. Los paises ondaire sont moins susceptibles de se marier
Resumen donde un mayor porcentaje de mujeres han pendant l'adolescence. Dans les pays ou' la pro-
Un estudio que utilizo' datos de 40 Encuestas completado la educacio'n secundaria presen- portion des femmes scolarise'es au niveau sec-
Demogrdficas y de Salud indica que una pro- tan una proporcio'n ma's baja de casamientos ondaire est plus eleve'e, celle des femmes mar-
porcio'n sustancial de mujeres de paises en de- durante la adolescencia. ie'es avant l'adge de 20 ans est moindre.
sarrollo todavia se casan durante la adoles-
cencia. En general, el 20-50% de las mujeres Resume
se casan o inician una vida consensual a lie- Une e'tude fonde'e sur les donne'es de 40 En-
gar a los 18 afios, y el 40-70% lo hacen a lle- qu^tes de'mographiques et de sante' r've une
gar a los 20 afios. La mayor prevalencia de mat- tendance continue au mariage pre'coce dans les
rimonios a temprana edad se presenta en el pays en voie de de'veloppement. Dans l'en-
Africa Subsahariana y en el Sur de Asia, y la semble, 20% a 50% des femmes se marient ou
menor prevalencia en el Africa del Norte, el Ori- forment une union avant l'age de 18 ans, et
ente Medio y el Asia Sudoriental. Las mujeres 40% a' 70%, avant l'age de 20 ans. Le mariage
de entre 20 y 24 afios presentan una menor precoce est le plus fre'quent en Afrique subsa-
probabilidad de casarse antes de los 20 afios que harienne et en Asie du Sud; il est le moins com-
aquellas de entre 40 y 44 afios; el diferencial mun en Afrique du Nord, au Moyen-Orient
es de por lo menos 10 puntos porcentuales en et en Asie du Sud-Est. Lesfemmes age'es de 20