THBT it is not in the best interest of Palestinian people to accept a two-state solution

offered by the UN. [OPP]

a) Impractical & Sceptical

b) Unfair

a) Impractical & Sceptical

-The most dangerous part of us falling for the 2 state solution, which sounds like the
epitome of peace-making and harmony, is that we consider dividing PALESTINE into two
states as a SOLUTION however that’s the entire PROBLEM! (stepping over the rights of
Palestine)

-do u want to repeat the history and make fun of Palestinian lives once again?
-what abt the previous 2 state solution 1988?
-why would Israel not violate it once again when we hv already see it pass over the 2 state
solution and continue to massmurder the Palestinians
-Not only Israel but UN is also not trustworthy at all! (the useless political propaganda used
by the vetos to secure their economic and geopolitical interests)
UN spends billions on peacekeeping missions yet fails to do so...
-israel has always crossed the boundries and it always will...a long list of war crimes and the
ethnic cleaning of millions of Palestinians, israels’ hands are already in blood...first let’s
consider punishing it, then will we only be able to discuss what is in the best interest of
Palestinian people
-this 2 state solution provides Israel with a perfect bridge to sneak out of its criminal history
and the atrocities it committed so that it can start its inhumane treatment once again, that
too with the entire world by its side, accepting its existence...HOW can this ever be in the
best interest of Palestinians who were are and will be subjected to every sort of torture, will
be forced to leave everything once Israel feels like violating the 2 state solution ONCE
AGAIN!

b) Unfair
-why should Palestine compromise at all?
-is it not their homeland which was illegally occupied by the settler colony of Israel
-UN offering a two state solution is a crime in it’s own!...How can they support a settler
colony in the first place?! They can not give an inch of Palestinian land to a random maniac
who would come and try to own it!
-UN would violate its own rules...here is a passage from the official website of UN:

In 1960, the General Assembly adopted the Declaration on the

Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (General
Assembly resolution 1514 (XV)), known also as the Declaration on
Decolonization. By this resolution, the General Assembly, considering
the important role of the United Nations in assisting the movement for
independence in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories, solemnly
proclaimed the necessity of bringing colonialism in all its forms and
manifestations to a speedy and unconditional end, and in this context,
declared, inter alia, that all people had a right to self-determination .

Where does the self determination and an unconditional end to colonialism goes in the case
of Palestine?!
-from the river to the sea it’s all Palestine because the existence of Israel is in itself a
question (can you build a house upon an already existing house?? You can’t!)