You are on page 1of 88

A STUDY ON INFLUENCE OF BEHAVIORAL FACTORS ON

PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT IN BENGALURU

A project report submitted in partial fulfilment of the


requirement of the Master of Commerce (IFA) Post
Graduate Program

Submitted by

CHANDANA SURESH M

(REG.N0 22MCRIF012)

M.com Regular – 3rd semester

Under the guidance of


Dr. SURESH C K
Professor
School of Commerce
JAIN (Deemed-to-be University)

Bengaluru
October 2023

I
CERTIFICATE BY THE UNIVERSITY

Certified that the dissertation titled A STUDY ON INFLUENCE OF BEHAVIORAL


FACTORS ON PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT IN BENGALURU is based on an original
project study conducted by CHANDANA SURESH M bearing Register No. 22MCRMIF012
under the guidance of Dr. SURESH C K. He has attended the required guidance sessions
held. The project report has not formed a basis for award of any Degree/Diploma of any
University or Institution.

PLACE: BENGALURU
DATE:

Dr. DINESH NILKANT


DIRECTOR
SCHOOLOF COMMERCE
JAIN (Deemed- to -be University)

III
CERTIFICATE BY THE GUIDE

Certified that the dissertation titled is based A STUDY ON INFLUENCE OF


BEHAVIORAL FACTORS ON PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT IN BENGALURU on
an original project study conducted by CHANDANA SURESH M bearing Register No.
22MCRIF012 under my guidance. This project has not formed a basis for the award of any
Degree/Diploma of any University or Institution.

PLACE: BENGALURU
DATE:
Signature of The Guide
Dr. SURESH C K

III
DECLARATION BY THE STUDENT

This is to certify that the project titled is A STUDY ON INFLUENCE OF BEHAVIORAL


FACTORS ON PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT IN BENGALURU carried out
independently by me under the guidance of Dr. SURESH C K. This work is an original one
and has not been submitted earlier to any University or another Institution for the fulfilment of
the requirement of a course study or any other credential.

PLACE: BENGALURU
DATE:

CHANDANA SURESH M
USN NO: 22MCRIF012

IV
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am deeply indebted to Dr. CHENRAJ ROYCHAND, President, JAIN


(Deemed-to-be University) Trust, Bengaluru, for having admitted me to
undergo the M. Com Post-Graduation Program during the academic term
2020-2022 in this temple of learning.

I am pleased to thank Dr. DINESH NILKANT, Director, School of


Commerce, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru, for his leadership
and support while pursuing M. Com (IFA) Post-Graduation program during
the academic year 2023-2024.

I take this opportunity to express my gratitude to Dr. SURESH C K, and the


Coordinators, School of Commerce – P.G. Studies, JAIN (Deemed-to- be
University), Bengaluru, for their valuable guidance and support for the
successful completion of project work.

I take this opportunity to express my profound thanks to my guide Dr.


SURESH C K, Professor, School of Commerce, JAIN (Deemed-to-be
University), Bengaluru, for her valuable inputs and guidance for the
successful completion of the project work.

I am very thankful to my family and friends for their constant and


unconditional encouragement and support.

NAME: CHANDANA SURESH M


USNR: 22MCRIF012

V
ABSTRACT

For maximizing investment returns, it is essential to create diverse portfolios that strike a
balance between yield and risk. Additionally critical is managing a portfolio. You might need
to adjust your plan of action depending on your income level and risk tolerance. It is crucial to
comprehend investor behavior and take time frames into account. The impact of cultural and
behavioral factors was not looked at in earlier research that examined differences in portfolio
management across socioeconomic groups. In order to understand how different income levels,
cultural influences, and behavioral biases interact to affect portfolio performance and risk
management, this study addresses how cultural norms, values, and behavioral biases influence
decisions regarding investments within a variety of income backgrounds.

Key Words: Portfolio, Portfolio Management, Risk, Investment, Investment Behavior,


Culture, Financial Planning

VII
INDEX

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE No

CHAPTER I: Introduction 1-32

CHAPTER II: Review of Literature 33-39

CHAPTER III: Research Methodology 40-45

CHAPTER IV: Data Analysis and Interpretation 46-68

CHAPTER V: Findings, Suggestions and Conclusions 69-71

REFERENCES IX-X

ANNEXURES XI-XVII

VII
LIST OF TABLES AND GRAPHS

SL NO PARTICULARS PAGE NO
4.2.1 Demographic and investment profile of respondents in stock 48
market
4.2.2 Frequency of gender 49
4.2.3 Frequency of age 49
4.2.4 Frequency of level of education 49
4.2.5 Frequency of annual income 50
4.2.6 Frequency of participation in stock market 50
4.2.7 Frequency of courses attended 50
4.2.8 Frequency of experience in stock market 51
4.2.9 Descriptive table of loss aversion behavior in Bangalore 52
4.2.10 Pie chart of loss aversion behavior 52
4.2.11 Pie chart of loss aversion behavior 53
4.2.12 Pie chart of loss aversion behavior 53
4.2.13 One way ANOVA (Fisher’s) Loss aversion behavior 53
4.2.14 Descriptive table of risk perception behavior in Bangalore 55
4.2.15 Pie chart of risk perception 55
4.2.16 Pie chart of risk perception 56
4.2.17 Pie chart of risk perception 56
4.2.18 Pie chart of risk perception 57
4.2.19 One way ANOVA (Fisher’s) risk perception behavior 57
4.2.20 Descriptive table of overconfidence behavior in Bangalore 59
4.2.21 Pie chart of overconfidence behavior 59
4.2.22 Pie chart of overconfidence behavior 60
4.2.23 Pie chart of overconfidence behavior 60
4.2.24 Pie chart of overconfidence behavior 61
4.2.25 One way ANOVA (Fisher’s) overconfidence behavior 61
4.2.26 Descriptive table of herding behavior in Bangalore 63
4.2.27 Pie chart of herding behavior 63
4.2.28 Pie chart of herding behavior 64
4.2.29 Pie chart of herding behavior 64
4.2.30 Pie chart of herding behavior 65
4.2.31 One way ANOVA (Fisher’s) herding behavior in Bangalore 65
4.2.32 Pie chart of Portfolio returns 67
4.2.33 Hypothesis analysis 68

VIII
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION

1
INTRODUCTION:

The world of finance, often depicted as a realm of cold rationality and objective decision-making,
is increasingly being viewed through a new lens - one that recognizes the profound impact of
human psychology and behavior. This field, known as behavioral finance, has emerged as a
powerful paradigm shift, challenging traditional notions of how individuals make financial
decisions, manage investments, and construct portfolios. In this introduction, we will explore the
broader topic of behavioral finance and elucidate the significance of understanding how behavioral
factors impact investment decisions and outcomes.

1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Investment is a multifaceted endeavor that serves as a crucial pillar of financial growth and
security. Its significance lies in its ability to help individuals and institutions achieve a wide range
of financial objectives, such as wealth accumulation, income generation, capital preservation, and
funding future goals.

Investors have a diverse array of asset classes at their disposal, including equities, fixed income,
real estate, commodities, and cash equivalents, each offering varying risk and return profiles.
Managing risk is paramount in successful investing, as it involves understanding market risk,
credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and inflation risk.

Key principles for successful investing include diversification, aligning investments with one's
time horizon and risk tolerance, thorough research, cost management, and maintaining discipline.
By adhering to these principles and navigating the complexities of the investment world,
individuals and institutions can work towards achieving their financial aspirations in an ever-
evolving financial landscape.

Investment entails committing funds into an asset with the anticipation of capital appreciation,
dividend payouts, or interest earnings. Virtually all investment avenues carry some level of risk,
ranging from equities to real estate and even fixed interest securities, which can be affected by
factors like inflation. An effective investment strategy involves tailoring the portfolio to meet

2
specific objectives. One of the most renowned and successful investors in history, Warren Buffett,
was ranked as the second wealthiest individual on Forbes' 400 list in March 2013. Buffett has
consistently emphasized the importance of a long-term investment approach and underscores the
necessity of thorough research when selecting assets. Diversification of investments is a common
practice aimed at mitigating avoidable and unproductive risks. Investments are commonly
categorized into traditional and alternative categories.

The term "traditional investments" encompasses assets like bonds, cash, real estate, and equities,
including stocks and shares. On the other hand, "alternative investments" encompass a diverse
range of unconventional options. These include investments in valuable commodities like precious
metals, fine art, wine, antiques, rare coins, or stamps. Additionally, alternative investments extend
to certain financial instruments such as commodities, private equity, distressed securities, hedge
funds, carbon credits, venture capital, film production ventures, and financial derivatives.

Traditional investments are the well-established bedrock of financial markets, offering liquidity
and relatively clear risk profiles. Bonds provide fixed interest payments, cash offers liquidity, real
estate can appreciate over time, and stocks represent ownership in companies, offering the
potential for capital gains.

Investing is a profound endeavor that can significantly shape an individual's future financial well-
being. Within the realm of investment, there exists a myriad of avenues where individuals can
allocate their savings. Each of these investment avenues presents a unique combination of risks
and potential returns, setting them apart from one another. Interestingly, even if individuals opt not
to select specific assets, such as stocks, investments can still be made inadvertently through
participation in pension plans, employee savings programs, or the acquisition of life insurance
policies or real estate properties.

For investors, the critical task lies in choosing the appropriate investment avenue, a decision
contingent on their specific financial needs, risk tolerance, and expected returns. The dynamic
nature of the investment landscape in India provides a wealth of choices, from traditional
instruments like fixed deposits and government bonds to more contemporary options like mutual
funds and real estate investments. Moreover, the burgeoning market for digital and fintech

3
solutions has expanded the array of investment avenues further, offering convenience and
accessibility.

In the end, investing is a very personal journey that demands careful consideration of each
investor's financial goals and risk tolerance. Making wise decisions is essential to establishing a
healthy financial future, whether they are made in traditional or new investing paths. In essence,
the investing landscape is a broad canvas on which investors may paint their financial futures by
making wise choices and allocating their funds wisely.

A branch of finance known as "behavioral finance" integrates psychological and economic theories
to better understand how people and investors make financial decisions. Behavioral finance
acknowledges that human behavior is impacted by a variety of cognitive biases, emotions, and
social influences as opposed to classical finance theory, which makes the assumption that people
are rational and base their judgments on factual information. The main ideas and tenets of
behavioral finance are examined in this essay along with the different biases that influence
financial judgment and the real-world applications of behavioral finance.

The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), a tenet of conventional finance theory, asserts that
financial markets are perfectly efficient and that asset prices always reflect all available
information. EMH contends that it is difficult to continually outperform the market since asset
prices include all essential information. However, behavioral finance disproves this idea by
emphasizing that market prices are susceptible to irrational behavior and that investors do not
always act rationally.

Behavioral finance's prospect theory, which was created in the 1970s by Daniel Kahneman and
Amos Tversky, is one of its core ideas. According to prospect theory, people assess possible profits
and losses in relation to a reference point, usually their existing wealth or a recent experience,
rather than in an absolute sense. When faced with possible rewards, people tend to be risk-averse,
but when faced with losses, they tend to be risk-seeking. Loss aversion is a trait that significantly
influences irrational financial behavior.

1.2 HISTORY OF THE RESEARCH STUDY IN BANGALORE

4
1.2.1 Financial Landscape

Bangalore, frequently referred to as India's "Silicon Valley," is not only a booming center for
technology and innovation but also an important participant in the nation's financial industry.
Bangalore, the capital of the Indian state of Karnataka, has a thriving financial ecosystem that is
diversified and active, highlighted by the presence of financial institutions, a developing stock
exchange, and a welcoming environment for investments.

Bangalore is home to a substantial network of financial institutions that may meet a variety of
demands. Commercial banks, cooperative banks, non-banking financial firms (NBFCs), and
microfinance institutions are some examples of these organizations. They are essential in
facilitating investments, facilitating access to finance, and supporting the financial stability of
people and businesses in the area.

The city is home to the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE), one of the country's leading stock
exchanges. The NSE, headquartered in Bandra-Kurla Complex, Mumbai, has a prominent
presence in Bangalore, serving as a critical platform for trading equities, derivatives, and other
financial instruments. The NSE's accessibility has made it a vital component of Bangalore's
financial landscape, connecting investors to the broader Indian capital market.

Bangalore's investment climate is marked by a burgeoning middle-class population with a growing


appetite for investments. The city's cosmopolitan culture, coupled with a strong emphasis on
education and innovation, has fostered a community of informed and tech-savvy investors. As a
result, Bangalore has witnessed increased interest in various investment avenues, including
equities, mutual funds, real estate, and fixed-income instruments.

The city's financial landscape has also evolved significantly with advancements in technology. The
adoption of online trading platforms, the rise of robo-advisory services, and the emergence of
fintech startups have made investing more accessible and convenient for residents.

Furthermore, regulatory bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) have
played a pivotal role in maintaining transparency and safeguarding investor interests in Bangalore's
financial markets.

5
1.2.2 Evolution of Investment Behavior

Investment behavior and practices in Bangalore have undergone a notable transformation over the
years, reflecting both global financial trends and local dynamics. This evolution has been
influenced by several historical events and changes, shaping how people manage their portfolios
in the region.

In the early to mid-20th century, investment behavior in Bangalore was characterized by a


preference for traditional savings instruments, primarily fixed deposits and savings accounts
offered by banks. People favored low-risk, fixed-income options as they prioritized capital
preservation over capital growth.

An important turning point was highlighted by the deregulation of the Indian economy in the 1990s
and the development in information technology (IT). Bangalore became the center of Indian IT,
drawing a youthful, tech-savvy workforce. A increasing interest in equity investments, mutual
funds, and stock market involvement resulted from this generational transition.

The advent of the internet and online trading platforms revolutionized investment behavior.
Investors in Bangalore, like in other parts of India, embraced online trading, making it easier to
buy and sell stocks and other financial instruments. This shift expanded access to capital markets
and encouraged more active portfolio management.

Bangalore witnessed a surge in mutual fund investments, driven by increasing awareness and the
convenience of systematic investment plans (SIPs). Mutual funds gained popularity as they offered
diversified exposure to equities and other assets, attracting both seasoned and novice investors.

Historically, Bangalore has been an attractive destination for real estate investments. The city's
growth as a technology and business hub led to substantial investments in residential and
commercial properties. Real estate became a significant component of many portfolios in the
region.

6
Changes in financial regulations, including those related to taxation and investor protection, have
played a crucial role in shaping investment behavior. Investors have adapted to evolving
regulations and tax structures that impact their investment choices and portfolio management
strategies.

The rise of fintech startups and robo-advisory services has introduced innovative approaches to
portfolio management. These digital platforms offer automated and algorithm-driven investment
solutions, catering to investors seeking convenience and personalized advice.

1.2.3 Growth of Financial Services

Over the years, Bangalore has witnessed remarkable growth and diversification in its financial
services sector. This expansion has been driven by the city's economic vibrancy, its position as an
IT and technology hub, and the increasing wealth and investment appetite of its residents. The
growth of financial services has been instrumental in shaping the investment landscape of the
region.

With the rising complexity of financial markets and investment options, the demand for expert
guidance has surged. Financial advisors and consultants have played a pivotal role in assisting
individuals and businesses in making informed investment decisions. Bangalore has seen the
proliferation of certified financial planners, investment advisors, and wealth managers who
provide personalized advice tailored to clients' financial goals.

Numerous wealth management companies have been established in Bangalore as a result of the
city's high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) and wealthy families. These companies provide a
variety of services, including as wealth protection, tax preparation, and portfolio management.
They assist their customers grow and protect their wealth by catering to their particular
requirements and objectives.

Investors in Bangalore can now choose from a variety of investment products and vehicles. This
covers more sophisticated instruments like equities, mutual funds, real estate investment trusts
(REITs), and alternative investments in addition to more conventional choices like fixed deposits,

7
savings accounts, and government bonds. Due to the wide range of options, investors can diversify
their portfolios in accordance with their level of risk tolerance and financial goals.

The city's financial services sector has embraced fintech innovations, resulting in the seamless
integration of technology into financial processes. Online trading platforms, robo-advisors, and
digital wealth management solutions have become increasingly popular. These platforms provide
accessibility, convenience, and cost-effective investment options, particularly appealing to tech-
savvy investors.

Bangalore's financial services growth has been supported by a robust regulatory framework
provided by institutions like the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the Reserve
Bank of India (RBI). These regulatory bodies have introduced measures to protect investors'
interests, ensure transparency, and foster market integrity, contributing to the confidence o f
investors.

Efforts to promote financial inclusion have led to the expansion of banking and financial services
to underserved areas and communities in Bangalore. This has increased access to basic financial
products and services, encouraging participation in the formal financial system.

The city offers a comprehensive range of financial products, expert advisory services, and
innovative fintech solutions. This ecosystem has not only facilitated investment opportunities but
has also contributed to the region's economic growth and prosperity.

This robust financial services landscape sets the stage for exploring the influence of behavioral
factors on portfolio management in Bangalore, where investors have access to a rich tapestry of
financial resources and expertise.

1.2.4 Technological Advancements and Portfolio Management

Technological advancements have revolutionized portfolio management practices in Bangalore,


providing investors with tools and platforms that enhance accessibility, efficiency, and
convenience. The adoption of cutting-edge technology, including online trading platforms, robo-
advisors, and fintech innovations, has reshaped the investment landscape in the region.

8
The development of online trading platforms has opened up the financial markets to more people.
Bangalore, with its tech-savvy population, has witnessed a substantial increase in online trading
activities. Investors can execute trades, monitor portfolios, and access real-time market
information from the comfort of their homes or mobile devices. The convenience and speed of
online trading have attracted a diverse range of investors, from beginners to experienced traders.

Robo-advisors have gained popularity in Bangalore as a cost-effective and automated way to


manage portfolios. These digital platforms use algorithms to create and manage diversified
investment portfolios based on investors' risk profiles and financial goals. Bangalore's investors
have embraced robo-advisory services for their accessibility, low fees, and the ability to provide
tailored investment strategies.

Bangalore's status as India's technology capital has contributed to the city's thriving fintech sector.
Fintech startups have introduced innovative solutions for portfolio management. These include
mobile apps for tracking investments, peer-to-peer lending platforms, crowdfunding platforms,
and digital payment systems. Fintech innovations have made it easier for investors to manage their
finances, invest in startups, and explore alternative investment avenues.

Technological advancements in data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) have empowered
investors in Bangalore with sophisticated tools for data-driven decision-making. Investors can now
access predictive analytics, sentiment analysis, and machine learning models to assess market
trends, identify investment opportunities, and manage risk more effectively.

Bangalore has been at the forefront of blockchain and cryptocurrency adoption in India. The city
is home to numerous blockchain startups and crypto exchanges. Investors in Bangalore have
shown interest in digital assets as an alternative investment class, leveraging blockchain
technology for transparency and security.

Technology has played a crucial role in providing financial education and literacy to investors in
Bangalore. Online courses, webinars, and educational apps have empowered investors to make
more informed decisions and understand the intricacies of portfolio management.

9
With increased online activity, ensuring the security of financial transactions and data has become
paramount. Technological advancements have led to the development of robust cybersecurity
measures and encryption protocols, assuring investors of the safety of their investments.

1.2.5 Regulatory Changes in the Financial and Investment Landscape

Over the years, India has implemented several pivotal regulatory changes and reforms that have
profoundly influenced the financial and investment landscape. These reforms have not only
impacted the country's financial markets but have also played a significant role in shaping the way
investments are managed and protected.

The establishment of SEBI in 1988 marked a critical milestone. SEBI is India's regulatory
authority for the securities and commodities market. Its mandate includes investor protection,
regulation of stock exchanges, and oversight of market intermediaries. SEBI's initiatives, including
introducing stricter disclosure norms and improving corporate governance, have bolstered investor
confidence.

The introduction of the National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) and Central Depository
Services Limited (CDSL) revolutionized the way securities are held and traded. The
dematerialization of securities eliminated the need for physical share certificates and reduced the
risk of fraud. This change made trading and portfolio management more efficient.

The rollout of the GST in 2017 streamlined India's indirect tax system. This reform eliminated a
complex web of taxes and harmonized tax rates across states. It has had implications for
investments in various sectors, including real estate and logistics, by creating a unified tax
structure.

Initiatives such as the merger of public sector banks, the introduction of prompt corrective action
(PCA) for underperforming banks, and the establishment of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
(IBC) have brought significant changes to the banking and financial sector. These reforms aim to
strengthen the banking system, improve credit availability, and enhance the overall stability of the
financial sector.

10
India has periodically revised its FDI policy to attract foreign investments. Changes in FDI limits
and sectors eligible for automatic approval have influenced investment flows, including those in
sectors like e-commerce, retail, and telecommunications.

SEBI has introduced measures to enhance investor protection, such as the Investor Protection and
Education Fund (IPEF) and the Investor Grievance Redressal Mechanism. These initiatives aim to
safeguard investors' interests and provide avenues for dispute resolution.

SEBI has continuously updated mutual fund regulations to ensure transparency, fairness, and
investor protection. These regulations impact how mutual funds operate and how investors
participate in these investment vehicles.

1.2.6 Investor Demographics

Investors in Bangalore exhibit diverse demographics, reflecting a dynamic and varied investment
landscape. These investors encompass a wide range of income levels, age groups, and investment
preferences.

Income Levels:

• High-Income Investors:
Bangalore is home to a significant number of high-income investors who have substantial financial
resources at their disposal. These investors often have the capacity to engage in a wide spectrum
of investments, including equities, real estate, and alternative assets.

• Middle-Income Investors:
A sizable portion of the investor population falls into the middle-income bracket. They prioritize
building wealth through a combination of savings, mutual funds, and fixed-income investments.
For many, achieving financial stability and planning for future goals are primary objectives.

• Low-Income and Aspiring Investors:


Some investors in the region have more modest incomes but aspire to grow their wealth over time.
They often start with small investments, such as systematic investment plans (SIPs) in mutual

11
funds or savings accounts, and gradually increase their exposure to higher-return assets as their
incomes rise.

Age Groups:

• Young Investors:
Bangalore's status as a technology and education hub attracts a significant population of young
investors, including professionals and students. Many in this group have a higher risk appetite and
are inclined to invest in equities and start-ups. They are focused on long-term wealth creation and
financial independence.

• Middle-Aged Investors:
Investors in their middle years often prioritize a balanced portfolio that combines growth and
stability. They may have commitments like home purchases and children's education, influencing
their investment choices. This group often diversifies across mutual funds, real estate, and fixed-
income securities.

• Retirees and Seniors:


Retirees and seniors in the region typically seek stable income streams and capital preservation.
They favor investments like fixed deposits, senior citizen savings schemes, and dividend-yielding
stocks. Safety and consistent returns are paramount considerations for this demographic.

Investment Preferences

• Equities:
Many investors in the region are drawn to the potential for high returns offered by the stock market.
They engage in equity investments directly or through mutual funds, with a focus on sectors like
technology, healthcare, and finance.

• Real Estate:
Bangalore's thriving real estate market appeals to investors looking for long-term capital
appreciation and rental income. Residential and commercial properties, including tech parks and
office spaces, attract investments.

12
• Mutual Funds:
Mutual funds, particularly equity and debt funds, are popular among a broad spectrum of investors.
SIPs are a favored method for systematic wealth creation.

• Fixed-Income:
Fixed-income instruments like fixed deposits, government bonds, and corporate bonds provide
stable returns and safety for risk-averse investors.

• Start-up Investments:
Given Bangalore's reputation as India's start-up capital, some investors participate in venture
capital or angel investing, seeking potentially significant returns from innovative companies.

Cultural and Regional Diversity

Bangalore's cosmopolitan nature is reflected in its investor base. The city is a melting pot of
cultures and languages, with residents hailing from various parts of India and the world. This
cultural diversity can influence investment decisions, as different cultures may have unique
attitudes toward money, risk, and wealth management. Understanding the cultural nuances of
investors is essential for financial professionals seeking to build trust and provide tailored financial
advice.

Education and Awareness

Investor demographics also encompass varying levels of financial literacy and awareness. Some
investors in Bangalore may be well-informed and proactive in managing their investments, while
others may require more guidance and education. Bridging the gap in financial literacy is a critical
task for financial institutions and regulatory authorities, as it empowers individuals to make
informed investment choices.

1.3 CONCEPTS

13
Behavioral finance identifies numerous cognitive biases that influence financial decision-making.
These biases can lead to suboptimal investment choices and market inefficiencies. Here are some
of the most prominent biases:

1.3.1. Behavioral Finance and Portfolio Performance

Behavioral finance is a multidisciplinary field that integrates insights from psychology and
economics to examine how cognitive biases and emotional factors influence financial decision-
making. It challenges the traditional economic assumption that individuals always make rational
choices and instead acknowledges that human psychology often leads to deviations from
rationality. One of the central areas of study within behavioral finance is the profound impact of
these behavioral biases on portfolio performance.

1.3.2. Behavioral Bias

Behavioral bias, in the context of psychology and decision-making, refers to systematic and often
predictable patterns of irrationality or deviation from normative, rational decision-making
processes. These biases are inherent to human psychology and can significantly influence how
individuals perceive, evaluate, and act upon information, often leading to choices that may not
align with logic or reason. Behavioral biases are critical to understanding why people make
decisions that diverge from traditional economic models of rationality.

Key Characteristics of Behavioral Bias:

Predictable Patterns: Behavioral biases are not random; they follow consistent patterns that can be
identified and studied. These patterns are shared across individuals, making them predictable
elements of decision-making.

Systematic Deviation: Behavioral biases result in systematic deviations from rational decision-
making. In other words, they lead individuals to consistently make choices that are not in their best
interest, given the available information.

14
Cognitive Shortcuts: These biases often stem from cognitive shortcuts or heuristics that the human
brain uses to simplify complex decision-making processes. While these heuristics are generally
useful, they can lead to errors in judgment when applied to intricate situations.

Emotional Influence: Behavioral biases are closely tied to emotions. They can be triggered or
exacerbated by emotional responses, such as fear, greed, or overconfidence, which can cloud
judgment and lead to suboptimal decisions.

1.3.3. Cultural Influences

Cultural influences refer to the pervasive and enduring impact of a society's shared values, beliefs,
customs, traditions, and practices on the behavior, attitudes, and perceptions of its members. These
influences shape how individuals interact with their environment, make choices, and relate to
others. Culture serves as a powerful lens through which people interpret the world, influencing
their preferences, norms, and decision-making processes.

Key Aspects of Cultural Influences:

Values and Beliefs: Cultural influences encompass the fundamental values and beliefs held by a
society or group. These values often define what is considered right or wrong, important or
unimportant, and guide individual and collective behavior.

Norms and Customs: Cultures establish social norms and customs that dictate appropriate behavior
within specific contexts. These norms govern interactions, etiquette, rituals, and social
expectations.

Traditions and Rituals: Cultural traditions and rituals mark significant events, transitions, and
celebrations in life. They often reflect historical practices and carry deep cultural significance.

Language and Communication: Language is a fundamental cultural component that shapes how
individuals communicate and express themselves. It influences thought patterns, expressions of
emotions, and the transmission of cultural knowledge.

15
Cultural influences have far-reaching effects on individuals and societies:

Behavior and Decision-Making: Culture shapes individuals' behavior and decision-making by


providing a framework for understanding and responding to the world. It influences choices related
to family, education, career, and lifestyle.

Identity and Self-Concept: Cultural influences contribute to an individual's sense of identity and
self-concept. One's cultural background often plays a central role in self-perception and how they
relate to others.

Social Cohesion: Culture fosters social cohesion by providing shared values and norms that help
individuals form communities and collaborate effectively.

Conflict and Cooperation: Cultural differences can lead to both conflict and cooperation.
Understanding and respecting cultural influences is crucial in international diplomacy, business
negotiations, and conflict resolution.

Innovation and Change: Culture can either encourage or hinder innovation and change. It shapes
how societies adapt to new technologies, ideas, and social structures.

Cultural Diversity: It's important to note that cultures are diverse and multifaceted. Within any
given culture, there can be significant variations based on factors such as region, ethnicity, religion,
and socioeconomic status. Cultural influences are dynamic and can evolve over time in response
to external forces and changing societal values.

1.3.4. Financial Literacy

Financial literacy is the ability to understand and use various financial skills, including personal
financial management, budgeting, investing, and making informed financial decisions. It involves
possessing the knowledge and skills to navigate complex financial systems, evaluate financial
products, and plan for future financial goals effectively.

Key Components of Financial Literacy:

16
Financial Education: Financial literacy begins with education. It includes a fundamental
understanding of financial concepts, such as income, expenses, savings, investments, debt, and
risk. Individuals with financial literacy are knowledgeable about financial products and services,
including savings accounts, credit cards, loans, and investment options.

Budgeting and Money Management: Financial literacy includes the ability to create and manage a
budget. This involves tracking income, expenses, and savings, and making informed spending
decisions to meet financial goals.

Investment and Asset Management: Individuals with financial literacy can make informed
investment decisions. They understand various investment options, such as stocks, bonds, real
estate, and mutual funds, and can assess risk and return.

Debt Management: Financial literacy encompasses the knowledge and skills to manage debt
effectively. This includes understanding interest rates, credit scores, and repayment strategies.

Retirement Planning: Financially literate individuals plan for their long-term financial well-being,
including retirement. They understand retirement savings vehicles like 401(k)s and IRAs and can
set goals and develop strategies to achieve them.

Risk Management: Financial literacy includes an understanding of financial risks, such as


insurance options for health, life, and property, and the ability to assess and manage these risks.

Importance of Financial Literacy:

Financial literacy is crucial for individuals, families, and society as a whole:

Personal Financial Well-Being: Financially literate individuals are better equipped to manage their
money, save for the future, and avoid financial pitfalls like debt and fraud. They are more likely to
achieve financial security and meet their financial goals.

17
Economic Stability: Financial literacy among the populace promotes economic stability. Informed
consumers make better financial decisions, reducing the risk of financial crises and economic
downturns.

Wealth Building: Financial literacy is a key factor in wealth creation. It empowers individuals to
invest wisely, grow their assets, and accumulate wealth over time.

Consumer Protection: Financially literate consumers are less vulnerable to scams and predatory
financial practices. They can make informed choices and protect themselves from fraudulent
schemes.

1.3.5. Investor Education


Investor education refers to the process of providing individuals with the knowledge, skills, and
information necessary to make informed and responsible investment decisions. It aims to empower
investors to understand financial markets, evaluate investment opportunities, manage risk, and
achieve their financial goals. Investor education encompasses a wide range of topics related to
investing, including securities, financial instruments, market dynamics, and regulatory
frameworks.

Key Components of Investor Education:

Understanding Investment Basics: Investor education starts with building a foundational


understanding of investment concepts, such as stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and other financial
instruments. It includes learning about risk and return, diversification, and the trade-off between
different investment options.

Risk Assessment: Investors are educated on how to assess and manage risk in their investment
portfolios. This involves understanding the various types of investment risk, including market risk,
credit risk, and liquidity risk, and how to mitigate them.

Asset Allocation: Investor education emphasizes the importance of asset allocation, helping
individuals determine how to distribute their investments among different asset classes (e.g.,
stocks, bonds, real estate) to achieve their financial objectives while managing risk.

18
Financial Market Awareness: Investors are educated about the functioning of financial markets,
including stock exchanges, bond markets, and commodity markets. They learn about market
participants, trading mechanisms, and the impact of economic events on market dynamics.

Investment Strategies: Investor education covers various investment strategies, from long-term
buy-and-hold approaches to more active trading strategies. Investors are educated about the pros
and cons of each strategy and how to align them with their goals and risk tolerance.

Regulatory Compliance: Individuals are informed about regulatory frameworks governing


investments, including securities laws and financial market regulations. They learn how to
recognize and avoid fraudulent schemes and protect their investments.

Portfolio Management: Investor education includes guidance on building and managing


investment portfolios. This involves setting financial goals, selecting appropriate investments, and
monitoring portfolio performance over time.

Investor education plays a crucial role in financial well-being and market integrity:

Informed Decision-Making: It empowers individuals to make informed investment decisions,


reducing the likelihood of poor choices, losses, and falling victim to scams.

Financial Security: Educated investors are better equipped to plan for their financial future, save
for retirement, and build wealth over time.

Market Efficiency: A population with a strong understanding of investing contributes to market


efficiency by promoting fair and transparent trading practices.

Consumer Protection: Investor education helps protect consumers from fraudulent investment
schemes and unethical financial practices.

1.3.6. Investment Horizon

19
Investment horizon refers to the length of time an individual or institution expects to hold an
investment before needing to access the funds or achieve specific financial goals. It is a crucial
factor in investment decision-making, as it helps determine the appropriate investment strategies
and asset allocation to meet financial objectives.

Key Points About Investment Horizon:

Short-Term vs. Long-Term: Investment horizons can vary widely, ranging from short-term
(typically less than one year) to long-term (five years or more). Short-term horizons often involve
immediate or near-future financial needs, such as covering upcoming expenses or managing
liquidity. Long-term horizons are associated with goals like retirement planning, buying a home,
or funding a child's education.

Risk Tolerance: Investment horizons are closely linked to an individual's or institution's risk
tolerance. Generally, longer investment horizons allow for a higher tolerance for risk because there
is more time to ride out market fluctuations. Short-term investors tend to prefer lower-risk, more
liquid investments.

Investment Choices: The choice of investment vehicles and strategies can vary based on the
investment horizon. Long-term investors may focus on growth-oriented assets like stocks and real
estate, while short-term investors might prioritize safety and liquidity with assets such as cash or
short-term bonds.

Financial Goals: Investment horizons are aligned with specific financial goals. For example, a
young investor with a long-term horizon might aim to build wealth for retirement, while a person
nearing retirement may have a shorter horizon focused on preserving capital and generating
income.

Diversification: The investment horizon also affects the diversification strategy. Long-term
investors can afford to take on more concentrated positions or invest in assets with higher volatility,
while short-term investors may need more diversification to manage risk.

20
Asset Allocation: Asset allocation, or the mix of different asset classes (e.g., stocks, bonds, real
estate), is determined in part by the investment horizon. A longer horizon might lead to a higher
allocation to equities, which historically offer higher returns but also higher volatility.

Example Scenarios:

Long-Term Horizon: An individual in their 30s planning for retirement 30 years from now has a
long-term investment horizon. They can allocate a significant portion of their portfolio to growth-
oriented assets like stocks, which may experience market fluctuations but have the potential for
higher returns over time.

Short-Term Horizon: A person saving for a down payment on a home they plan to purchase in two
years has a short-term investment horizon. They may choose safer, more liquid investments like
certificates of deposit (CDs) or a money market account to ensure their funds are readily available
when needed.

Intermediate Horizon: An investor with a five-year horizon may have a combination of short-term
and long-term goals. Their portfolio allocation might balance growth potential with the need for
access to funds within a relatively shorter timeframe.

1.3.7. Investor Demographics

Investor demographics refer to the statistical characteristics and attributes of individuals or groups
who participate in financial markets by making investments in various asset classes such as stocks,
bonds, real estate, and other financial instruments. This profiling provides insights into the
composition of the investor population, including factors such as age, gender, income, education,
and geographic location.

Key Components of Investor Demographics:

Age: Age is a fundamental demographic factor among investors. It is often categorized into groups
such as millennials, Generation X, baby boomers, and seniors. Different age groups tend to have
varying investment goals and risk tolerances.

21
Gender: Gender demographics explore the distribution of investors by sex. Historically, there has
been a gender gap in investment participation and attitudes toward risk.

Income Levels: Income demographics categorize investors based on their annual earnings. Income
brackets can range from low-income to high-income investors. Income levels often correlate with
investment capacity and strategies.

Education: Education demographics examine the educational background of investors, including


their highest level of attainment. More educated investors may have a better understanding of
financial concepts and investment options.

Occupation: Occupation demographics consider the type of work or profession in which investors
are engaged. Different occupations can influence investment behavior and preferences.

Geographic Location: Geographic demographics focus on the geographic distribution of investors,


including urban, suburban, and rural areas. Regional economic conditions and access to financial
services can impact investment decisions.

1.3.8. Portfolio Diversification

Portfolio diversification is an investment strategy that involves spreading an investment portfolio


across a variety of different asset classes, securities, or investment opportunities. The primary goal
of diversification is to reduce the overall risk of the portfolio while optimizing the potential for
returns. By not putting all investments in a single basket, diversification aims to achieve a balance
between risk and reward.

Key Aspects of Portfolio Diversification:

Asset Classes: Diversification often involves investing in different asset classes, such as stocks,
bonds, real estate, and cash equivalents. Each asset class carries its own risk -return profile, and
they may not move in the same direction at the same time. By holding a mix of asset classes,
investors aim to offset potential losses in one category with gains in another.

22
Securities or Investments: Within each asset class, diversification extends to holding a range of
individual securities or investment instruments. For example, in the stock market, diversification
may involve holding shares in multiple companies across various industries rather than
concentrating investments in a single company.

Industries or Sectors: Diversification can also extend to different industries or sectors within an
economy. Investing in a broad spectrum of industries helps mitigate the risk of underperformance
in a specific sector.

1.3.9. Market Volatility

Market volatility refers to the degree of variation in the price of a financial instrument, asset, or
market index over time. It measures the extent to which prices fluctuate, moving up and down,
within a specific period. Volatility is a key indicator of market risk and can influence investment
decisions, trading strategies, and portfolio management.

Key Aspects of Market Volatility:

Price Fluctuations: Market volatility is characterized by frequent and sometimes sharp price
fluctuations. It reflects the speed and magnitude of changes in asset prices.

Causes of Volatility: Various factors can contribute to market volatility, including economic data
releases, geopolitical events, corporate earnings reports, and changes in investor sentiment.
External shocks, such as natural disasters or political crises, can also trigger volatility.

Volatility Index: The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index), often referred to as the "fear gauge," is a
widely used measure of expected market volatility. It reflects market participants' expectations for
future volatility and is often used as an indicator of market sentiment.

Impact on Investments: Volatility can affect different asset classes differently. For example, stocks
are generally more volatile than bonds. Investors may adjust their portfolios in response to
changing levels of volatility.

23
Volatility Trading: Some traders and investors actively engage in volatility trading strategies,
seeking to profit from price swings or to hedge against market downturns.

Types of Volatility:

 Historical Volatility: This measures past price movements to assess how much an asset's
price has fluctuated over a specified period.

 Implied Volatility: The market's anticipation of future price volatility is reflected in implied
volatility, which is determined from options pricing. Significant market developments
frequently precede periods of high implied volatility.

1.3.10. Market Sentiment

Market sentiment refers to the overall emotional and psychological attitude or mood of investors
and traders toward a particular financial market, asset class, or individual security. It reflects the
collective feelings, opinions, and expectations of market participants, which can influence their
buying and selling decisions. Market sentiment plays a significant role in driving short-term
market movements and can impact asset prices.

Key Aspects of Market Sentiment:

Bullish vs. Bearish Sentiment: Market sentiment is often categorized as either bullish or bearish.
Bullish sentiment indicates optimism and a positive outlook, with investors expecting prices to
rise. Bearish sentiment, on the other hand, reflects pessimism and a belief that prices will decline.

Influence on Trading: Market sentiment can heavily influence trading decisions. When sentiment
is bullish, investors may buy assets in anticipation of rising prices, contributing to upward
momentum. Conversely, bearish sentiment may lead to selling, putting downward pressure on
prices.

24
Factors Influencing Sentiment: Market sentiment can be influenced by a wide range of factors,
including economic data releases, corporate earnings reports, geopolitical events, central bank
policies, and news headlines. Social media and financial news outlets can also amplify sentiment.

Sentiment Indicators: Various sentiment indicators and tools are used to gauge market sentiment.
These include sentiment surveys, put/call ratios, volatility indexes (such as the VIX), and
sentiment analysis algorithms that monitor news and social media sentiment.

Examples of Market Sentiment:

Earnings Reports: If a company announces better-than-expected earnings, it can generate bullish


sentiment, leading to a surge in its stock price as investors anticipate future growth.

Geopolitical Events: Geopolitical tensions, such as trade disputes or political instability, can create
bearish sentiment, causing investors to sell off riskier assets and seek safe havens like gold or
government bonds.

Social Media: Social media platforms like Twitter and Reddit have become influential sources of
market sentiment. Posts and discussions by individual investors on these platforms can trigger
sudden surges in trading activity and impact stock prices.

Central Bank Decisions: Central bank actions, such as interest rate changes or monetary policy
statements, can strongly influence market sentiment. Positive statements about economic growth
can boost bullish sentiment, while hints of economic concerns can generate bearish sentiment.

1.3.11. Risk Perception

Risk perception, in the context of finance and investing, refers to an individual's or entity's
subjective assessment of the degree of uncertainty or potential loss associated with a particular
investment or financial decision. It represents how investors perceive and evaluate the risks they
face when allocating capital, making investment choices, or engaging in financial transactions.
Risk perception is a highly subjective and psychological aspect of decision-making that can vary
widely among individuals and organizations.

25
Key Aspects of Risk Perception:

Risk Tolerance: Risk perception is closely related to an individual's risk tolerance, which is their
willingness and ability to accept the uncertainty and potential for loss associated with an
investment. Risk-tolerant individuals may perceive higher risks as acceptable, while risk-averse
individuals may view the same risks as unacceptable.

Behavioral Biases: Behavioral biases, such as loss aversion and overconfidence, can significantly
impact risk perception. For example, loss aversion may cause investors to perceive the risk of
losing money as more substantial than the potential reward of gaining the same amount. Subjective
Nature: Risk perception is inherently subjective, as it depends on an individual's personal beliefs,
experiences, and emotions. What one person perceives as a high-risk investment; another may
view as an opportunity.

Factors Influencing Perception: Several factors influence risk perception, including an individual's
past experiences with investments, knowledge of financial markets, financial goals, and tolerance
for risk. External factors such as economic conditions and market sentiment also play a role.

Examples of Risk Perception:

Technology Stocks: During the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s, many investors perceived
technology stocks as having low risk and high growth potential. As a result, they invested heavily
in these stocks, ultimately leading to a sharp market correction when the bubble burst.

Real Estate: Leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, there was widespread optimism and low
perceived risk in the housing market. Many investors believed that real estate prices would
continue to rise indefinitely. However, the subsequent collapse in housing prices demonstrated a
significant disconnect between perception and reality.

Cryptocurrencies: Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have seen extreme fluctuations in value. Some
investors perceive them as high-risk speculative assets, while others view them as a store of value

26
with the potential for substantial returns. These differing risk perceptions have contributed to the
cryptocurrency market's volatility.

1.3.12. Robo-Advisors

Robo-advisors, short for "robotic advisors," are automated, digital platforms that provide
algorithm-driven financial planning and investment services with minimal human intervention.
These platforms use advanced algorithms and computer algorithms to offer investment advice,
portfolio management, and financial planning services to individuals and, in some cases,
institutions. Robo-advisors have gained popularity for their accessibility, low fees, and
convenience.

Key Aspects of Robo-Advisors:

Algorithmic Decision-Making: Robo-advisors rely on algorithms to analyze an investor's financial


situation, goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Based on this information, they recommend a
diversified portfolio of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or other low-cost investments.

Low Costs: One of the primary advantages of robo-advisors is their cost-efficiency. They typically
charge lower fees compared to traditional human financial advisors, making them attractive to
cost-conscious investors.

Accessibility: Robo-advisors are accessible to a wide range of investors, including those with
smaller investment amounts. This accessibility has democratized investment management.

Diversification: Robo-advisors emphasize diversification as a way to manage risk. They allocate


investments across different asset classes to achieve a balanced portfolio.

Automated Rebalancing: Robo-advisors continuously monitor and automatically rebalance


portfolios to maintain the target asset allocation. This helps ensure that the portfolio aligns with
the investor's goals.

27
Limited Human Intervention: While robo-advisors automate many aspects of financial planning
and investing, some platforms offer limited human interaction through customer support or advisor
consultations.

1.3.13. Ethical Investing

Ethical investing, also known as socially responsible investing (SRI) or sustainable investing, is
an investment approach that integrates ethical, social, and environmental criteria into the
investment decision-making process. Investors who practice ethical investing seek to generate
financial returns while supporting companies and projects that align with their values and promote
positive societal and environmental outcomes. This approach has gained prominence as investors
increasingly consider the broader impacts of their investments beyond financial gain.

Key Aspects of Ethical Investing:

Values-Based Selection: Ethical investors typically screen investments based on specific criteria
that reflect their values. These criteria can include environmental sustainability, social justice,
corporate governance, and ethical business practices.

Positive and Negative Screening: Investors can employ positive screening by actively seeking out
companies or projects that have a positive impact on society or the environment. Negative
screening involves excluding investments in industries or companies that are perceived as harmful,
such as tobacco, weapons, or fossil fuels.

Engagement and Advocacy: Ethical investors may engage with companies in their portfolios to
encourage responsible business practices. This can include advocating for transparency,
sustainability initiatives, and ethical governance.

ESG Integration: Many ethical investing strategies incorporate environmental, social, and
governance (ESG) factors into their decision-making process. ESG criteria assess a company's
performance in areas such as environmental sustainability, labor practices, and board diversity.

28
Impact Investing: Some ethical investors actively seek investments that have a measurable positive
impact on society or the environment, even if financial returns are secondary. Impact investments
aim to generate both financial returns and meaningful change.

1.3.14. Emotional Intelligence

Emotional Intelligence (EI), often referred to as Emotional Quotient (EQ), is the ability to
recognize, understand, manage, and effectively use one's own emotions as well as the emotions of
others. It encompasses a set of emotional and social skills that enable individuals to navigate the
complexities of human relationships, communicate effectively, empathize with others, and make
informed decisions based on emotional cues. EI plays a crucial role in personal and professional
success, contributing to effective leadership, teamwork, and interpersonal relationships.

Key Components of Emotional Intelligence:

Self-Awareness: Self-awareness is the foundation of EI. It involves the ability to recognize and
understand one's own emotions, strengths, weaknesses, values, and motivations. Self-aware
individuals can accurately assess their emotional states and how those emotions influence their
thoughts and behaviors.

Self-Regulation: Self-regulation refers to the ability to manage and control one's emotions and
impulses. This includes the capacity to stay composed under pressure, adapt to changing
circumstances, and handle stress and frustration with resilience.

Empathy: The ability to notice and comprehend the feelings and viewpoints of others is known as
empathy. It entails paying attention to nonverbal signs, actively listening, and displaying real
concern and compassion for the thoughts and feelings of others.

Social Skills: The ability to successfully negotiate social settings is a component of social skills.
People with excellent social skills are better at communicating, resolving conflicts, working
together, and forming wholesome relationships.

29
Motivation: Motivation in the context of EI involves the drive to pursue personal and professional
goals with enthusiasm and persistence. Motivated individuals set high standards for themselves
and are resilient in the face of setbacks.

Emotional Intelligence (EI) holds a crucial role as it directly addresses the emotional and
psychological aspects of investment decision-making. These areas are not solely about numbers
and market analysis; they also involve understanding and managing the emotions that can drive
financial decisions. Here's how EI is relevant:

1. Self-Awareness in Investment Behavior: Portfolio managers and investors benefit from


self-awareness, the foundation of EI. Recognizing one's own emotional responses to market
fluctuations, risk, and financial goals can help individuals make more rational and objective
investment decisions. For example, being aware of fear or overconfidence can prevent impulsive
actions.
2. Self-Regulation for Sound Decision-Making: The ability to self-regulate emotions is vital
in behavioral finance. EI enables investors to manage stress, impulsive reactions, and the
temptation to chase trends or panic during market volatility. Self-regulation helps maintain a
disciplined, long-term investment approach.

3. Empathy for Understanding Market Sentiment: Empathy, a key component of EI, extends
to understanding the emotions and behaviors of other market participants. Investors who can
empathize with market sentiment and the perspectives of other investors are better equipped to
anticipate market trends and make informed investment choices.

4. Social Skills for Collaboration and Learning: EI fosters effective social skills, which are
valuable for collaboration in the financial industry. Portfolio managers often work in teams, and
investors can benefit from sharing experiences and insights. Effective communication and
collaboration can lead to more successful investment strategies.

5. Motivation for Achieving Financial Goals: High motivation, another aspect of EI, is
essential for setting and pursuing financial goals. Investors with strong motivation remain
committed to their objectives, even in the face of challenges or market setbacks.

30
6. Managing Investor Behavior: In behavioral finance, understanding and managing investor
behavior is central. EI equips financial professionals to address the emotional triggers that can lead
to impulsive or irrational investment decisions. By providing emotional support and guidance,
financial advisors can help clients stay on track with their financial plans.

7. Avoiding Emotional Biases: EI helps individuals recognize and mitigate common


emotional biases that impact investment decisions, such as loss aversion, confirmation bias, and
herding behavior. By countering these biases, investors can make more rational choices.

8. Enhancing Client-Advisor Relationships: Financial advisors with strong EI can build trust
and rapport with clients, creating a comfortable environment for discussing financial goals, risk
tolerance, and investment strategies. Clients are more likely to follow advice when they feel
understood and respected.

1.3.15. Behavioral Finance Models

Behavioral finance models are analytical frameworks and theories that seek to explain how
psychological factors and cognitive biases influence financial decision-making. These models are
distinct from traditional finance theories, which assume that investors always act rationally and in
their best economic interest. Behavioral finance models acknowledge that human behavior in
financial markets often deviates from strict rationality and is influenced by emotions, heuristics,
and biases.

Behavioral finance models are essential for understanding the complexities of financial markets
and the often-irrational behavior of investors. These models provide valuable insights into why
markets may deviate from efficiency and how psychological factors can influence asset prices and
market dynamics.

1.4 SUMMARY OF THE CHAPTER

Financial planning includes portfolio management, which aids investors in enhancing their
investment portfolios for increased returns. The basic objective is to build a broad portfolio that
balances return and risk. This entails making investments in numerous asset classes from various

31
sectors and locales, such as equities, bonds, and real estate. In the event that one investment
underperforms, this helps safeguard the entire portfolio.

The strategies used to manage a portfolio can change depending on a person's financial objectives
and level of risk tolerance. While people with lesser salaries could favor safer options, those with
greater incomes might take more chances.

It's crucial to comprehend the thoughts and actions of investors. Investment decisions can be
influenced by emotions like greed and fear. Each person's preferences are taken into account as
skilled portfolio managers build balanced portfolios.

It's also crucial to take investors' objectives and time frames into account. Younger people could
be willing to endure brief ups and downs in exchange for greater prospective rewards. Retirees
might prioritize a consistent income and financial security.

It's critical to regularly review and modify the portfolio. Reviews assist in keeping the balance in
line with the investor's objectives and risk tolerance because market fluctuations can upset it. Large
organizations like pension funds and corporations also employ portfolio management. They
require techniques that can control risk and produce reliable returns because they manage a lot of
people's money.

Developing solutions for various income groups is a complicated aspect of portfolio management.
For long-term success, it's critical to have a broad portfolio that's in line with objectives and risk
tolerance. Investors can securely pursue their financial goals by taking all of these aspects into
account.

32
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE

33
2.1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE:

1. Arogundade, Sodiq & Yeboua, Kouassi & Mdud, Biyase. (2023). International
Portfolio Investment, Institutional Quality, and Income Inequality: Evidence from Global
Sample. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3114982/v1. This study examines the effect of total portfolio investment
and its sub-categories (debt and equity) on income inequality using a sample of 76 countries. The
empirical results show that foreign portfolio flows worsen income inequality in recipient countries,
regardless of the inequality indicators used. The study also digs deeper to examine the conditions
under which international portfolio investment can have an inequality-reducing effect. The
empirical evidence confirms our hunch that FPI, in the presence of good institutions, serves as a
catalyst for bridging the gap between the rich and poor. In other words, domestic factors such as
the quality of institutions modulate the link between portfolio investment flows and income
inequality. The estimated results are reassuringly robust to alternative measures of inequality
(Gini-index and Palma ratio), sub-categories of total portfolio investment (debt and equity), and
various estimators such as IV-2SLS, Machado and Silva quantile regression, and JKS Granger
non-causality results.
JEL classification: F3; P0; I30

2. Oliinyk, Viktor & Kozmenko, Olga. (2019). Optimization of investment portfolio


management. Serbian Journal of Management. 14. 10.5937/sjm14-16806. The task of creating
an investment portfolio by a financial institution is considered. Funds for creating a portfolio are
taken from two sources: enterprise's equity funds and borrowed funds. Optimization of the created
portfolio is performed. A portfolio of maximum efficiency was obtained with restriction on the
measure of risk, which is specified in the form of a VaR indicator. Using optimization portfolio
data, a model of portfolio asset management is being built. Using the Pontryagin maximum
principle, optimal strategies of its participants are determined. The optimal function of managing
the investment portfolio in the form of a share of the income received is found. Numerical results
of optimal management of investments in a financial portfolio from the financial institution as well
as from the creditor are presented.

3. Govindan, Murugan & Vetrivelan, D. (2023). AN ANALYZE THE INVESTMENT


BEHAVIORS AND STRATEGIES OF WOMEN INVESTORS. 12. 35-41. Savings play a
pivotal role in facilitating investment, which in turn can help to propel the economy of a nation.

34
India has the highest savings rate among households, with women's income making up an
increasingly important portion. In the past, women's earnings were seen as only a supplementary
source of household income, but now it is often a major factor that families rely on. As a result,
women must invest in order to be prepared for any unexpected circumstances. Research has shown
that women and men often have different approaches to investing, with women tending to have
lower risk tolerance and lower returns on their investments. This study aims to determine the
degree of knowledge and current investing habits of working women across various investment
routes, including gold, bonds, debentures, shares, chit funds, real estate, mutual funds, and life
insurance. Additionally, the study will try to evaluate the most influential factor in making
investment decisions, as well as the ideal investment portfolio for working women. For this
purpose, a survey of 324 women investors will be conducted. Ultimately, the goal of this research
is to increase investment literacy among women and raise awareness of the associated risks and
strategies for successful investing.

4. Violi, Roberto & Camerini, Enrico. (2018). Emerging market portfolio strategies,
investment performance, transaction cost and liquidity risk. Emerging equity and fixed
income markets (EM) have generally been open to foreign investors for more than two decades
now, and much has been learned about their risk-and-return properties during that time. As EM are
now more investable than ever, increased integration may have reduced opportunities for investors
searching for higher yields, as they look for high expected returns from assets that can be purchased
at prices cheaper than comparable assets in developed countries. Today, the question is whether
the empirical evidence would still suggest that there is a significant benefit t to including EM assets
in a globally diversified portfolio. Also, taking into consideration all the relevant risk
characteristics, do emerging markets have more downside risk than developed markets? The goal
of this paper was to explore the prominent risk drivers in the EM space, as we showed significant
continuity and variation vis-à-vis developed markets with conditions changing across different
markets, countries, sectors and over time. We argued the case for EM as a relevant asset class
overall. We found that country factors still dominate cross-country valuations; investment barriers
and other country factors are priced in, but 'risk appetite' factors are important as well. High
country-specific volatility can be diversified away, and a diversified basket of EM is not
necessarily riskier than a DM one and the high individual country volatility and country factors
create potentially useful investment opportunities for active asset managers. All in all, EM assets
still have higher risk than most developed markets (DM) and, as a result, continue to command

35
higher expected returns. As factor investing has become increasingly popular in DM, we show that
risk factor-based investment strategies have historically worked in EM too. While we focus most
of our discussion on equities, other asset classes have gained more prominence over time, such as
corporate bond market and frontier emerging markets. Since these latter markets are currently less
well-integrated within the global economy, investors having exposure to these markets can cushion
themselves against extreme movements in their portfolio returns. Institutional investors still
appeared to be underweighted in EM and there is considerable dispersion across different
institutions. Investors' overall preference tends to favor broad-based exposure to EM, i.e., not
limiting themselves to a specified c subset of investment opportunities. In addition, EM assets are
increasingly being viewed as an integrated part of global equity allocation. Lower transaction costs
and increasing market liquidity have played an important role in fostering the expansion of the
investor base in EM, however, transaction data-such as bid-ask spreads or market impact
estimates-and estimated liquidity measure continue to show a wide gap vis-à-vis DM. Moreover,
when liquidity is priced in, local risk factors matter even under the hypothesis of global market
integration; according to academic evidence, systematic liquidity risk appears to be important
empirically, much more so than local market risk. The implications of the higher trading costs and
lower liquidity of EM has fostered the role of benchmark index replication ('passive' investment),
boosting the expansion of efficient tools for index tracking, such as Exchange Traded Funds
(ETFs). Index funds and ETFs allow investors to buy and sell fewer liquid assets indirectly for low
transaction costs and their management fees are typically very low. Index funds and ETFs enable
short-term investors to invest indirectly in illiquid stocks at low cost. Therefore, investors'
compensation for investing in EM illiquid stocks has been eroded over the years as index funds
and ETFs have become more popular. These tools have contributed to a decline in the liquidity
premium. All in all, according to the empirical evidence discussed in this paper, it appears that
liquidity premia are not likely to be a prominent performance driver nor a source of significant
systematic risk for well-diversified EM portfolios.

5. Hossain, T. and Siddiqua, P. (2022), "Exploring the influence of behavioral aspects on


stock investment decision-making: a study on Bangladeshi individual investors", PSU
Research Review, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-10-
2021-0054. Determining the impact of behavioral influences on the stock market has significant
implications for investment analysis and portfolio management. Behavioral biases are parameters
that need to be considered in investment decision-making. The purpose of this study is to inform

36
Bangladeshi investors about behavioral biases that they may encounter when making investment
decisions in the prevailing frontier environment.

6. Rashid, Mohammed & Ahmad, Rais & Tariq, Shazeb. (2022). Financial Revolution:
From Traditional Finance to Behavioral and Neuro-finance. South Asian Journal of Social
Science and Humanities. Volume 3. 95-108. 10.48165/sajssh.2022.3408. The paper aims to
study the growth and evolution of finance, as well as how the evolution of finance theories aids
investors in decision-making. The traditional finance model's perfect mobility and rationality fail
to predict the economic events, dot-com bubble, and the European debt crisis. These economic
disasters provide the foundation for the development of behavioral finance. Psychology and
finance are merged into behavioral finance. It defies the traditional financial premise. The field
provides unique insights into financial and investment decision-making models. Behavioral
finance also serves as a bridge for developing novel financial solutions known as Neurofinance.
Neurofinance employs neurotechnology to explain participants' behavior and predict their future
behavior based on observing their brains and hormonal activity.

7. Pujara, Vikas & Joshi, Bhavesh. (2020). Indian Behavioral Finance: Review of
Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics. 9. 54-67.
10.4018/IJABE.2020070104. Behavioral finance is a relatively new field of study that combines
cognitive psychology and thoughts of leaders in economics, finance, and behavioral psychology
to explore the driving forces behind the financial decisions that people make. Making a decision
is a complex procedure that embraces cognitive and psychological biases. The paper attempts to
explore and document the literature available to review the biases in an Indian context, highlighting
specific and variable factors that impact, such as personality traits, and plausibly explain the
difference in the behavior from a traditional behavioral finance model. The review of literature
suggests that behavioral finance in an Indian context has a pattern, which can be followed to
interpret and understand the psychology of Indian investors. A conceptual framework is proposed
that considers various factors that can enable understanding Indian behavioral finance. In
particular, the impact of personality and financial determinants appear to be imperative to studying
behavioral bias in the Indian context.

8. Sendilvelu, K., & Shah, M. D. (2021). A STUDY ON IMPACT OF BEHAVIOURAL


FINANCE ON INVESTMENT DECISION OF SINGLE PARENTS IN SOUTH ASIAN

37
COUNTRIES. International Journal of Accounting & Finance Review, 6(2), 16-37.
https://doi.org/10.46281/ijafr.v6i2.1040. The purpose of this study is to find out the possible
impact of behavioral finance on the investment decision of a single parent. As being an
earning/working single parent who usually does not have other possible sources in their family,
the decision which they take must be a reliable one and cannot afford to get a second chance. In
the study, this study is also one of an effort to assess the impact of behavioral biases in the
investment decision-making of a single parent. A questionnaire is designed and responses are
collected from 203 respondents who prefer to invest where the level of risk is either low or
moderate and are more concerned about losses in their investment than substantial gain. Also, most
of the respondents were investing in order to meet some specific purpose, for their retirement plan
as well as to educate their children. This study concludes by stating that investors’ risk-taking
capacity is dependent on their level of income and the sources of income. Although every
Individual is subject to some biases, they tend to think more rational way than an average investor
in many ways as they know about their requirements and the investment they make.

9. Dowling, Michael, and Brian Lucey, 'The Future of Behavioral Finance', in H. Kent
Baker, Greg Filbeck, and Victor Ricciardi (eds), Financial Behavior: Players, Services,
Products, and Markets, Financial Markets and Investments (New York, 2017; online edn,
Oxford Academic, 18 May 2017), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190269999.003.0030,
accessed 10 Aug. 2023. The future of behavioral finance necessitates that the research areas of
behavioral corporate finance and investor psychology develop richer models of financial decision-
making behavior. Behavioral corporate finance requires expanding the focus from chief executive
officer characteristics to those of the entire top management team, and involves greater
understanding of organizational theory. A greater focus is needed on cross-cultural factors and how
they interact with behavioral influences. Investor psychology needs a more comprehensive theory
of the drivers of investor behavior and better data. This need is strong for investor sentiment
research, which might offer the most potential to advance understanding of psychological
influences on asset pricing. The chapter expands on these ideas and discusses an overall context
of the future philosophical development of behavioral finance and the inevitable push for greater
openness, replicability, and reliability in research.

In recent years, however this proposition is challenged by many quarters, particularly by the
practitioners of behavioral finance. The subject of study for behavioral finance is about the actual

38
behavior of investor at the time of taking financial decisions. One of the major themes related to
behavioral finance is heuristic driven bias (Shefrin, 2000).
In this paper, we have examined the existence of select behavioral biases among Indian investors.
The basic objective of this study is to understand the existence and extent of behavioral biases
among Indian investors.

2.2 RESEARCH GAP

Investment decision-making in financial markets has long been recognized as a complex interplay
between rational economic considerations and behavioral biases. While extensive research in
behavioral finance has explored the impact of psychological factors on investment choices, a
significant research gap exists concerning the influence of these behavioral factors on portfolio
performance in the context of Bangalore, India.

Previous studies have documented the presence of behavioral biases, such as loss aversion and
overconfidence, among investors in various global markets. However, the unique socio-cultural
and economic dynamics of Bangalore's financial ecosystem warrant a dedicated investigation into
the manifestation and consequences of these biases in this regional context. This research gap is
particularly pertinent given the growing importance of Bangalore as a hub for financial activities
and its diverse investor population.

Furthermore, while demographic characteristics are known to play a role in shaping investment
behavior, there is limited empirical evidence regarding how demographic trends specifically affect
investor decisions and portfolio outcomes in Bangalore. Understanding the interplay between
behavioral factors and demographic variables is essential for tailoring investment strategies and
financial services to the needs of different investor segments.

Therefore, this study aims to address these research gaps by empirically examining the presence
and impact of behavioral factors, exploring demographic trends, and providing practical insights
for investors in Bangalore. By doing so, it contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of
investor behavior in this specific regional context and offers guidance for practitioners seeking to
navigate the complexities of investment decision-making in Bangalore's financial landscape.

39
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

40
3.1 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:

This problem statement addresses the need to investigate the various behavioral factors, such as
loss aversion, risk perception, overconfidence, and herding behavior, that influence individuals'
decisions when investing in the stock market. Additionally, it aims to examine how demographic
variables, including gender, age, education, income, and investment experience, may play a role
in shaping these investment behaviors. The overarching goal is to gain a comprehensive
understanding of the dynamics and motivations behind investment decisions in the stock market,
ultimately contributing to more informed investment strategies and financial decision-making.

3.2 OBJECTIVES:

1. To understand the concepts of Behavioral Finance and Portfolio Management


2. To Analyze Behavioral Factors exhibited by investors in Bengaluru that impact their
portfolio management decisions
3. To Identify demographic profile of the respondents selected for the study in Bengaluru
4. To Provide Insights for Investors of Bengaluru

HYPOTHESIS:

Null Hypothesis (H0): Behavioral factors do not significantly influence portfolio performance in
Bangalore.
Alternate Hypothesis (H1): Behavioral factors significantly influence portfolio performance in
Bangalore.

3.3 NEED OF THE STUDY

The study aims to comprehensively analyze various behavioral factors such as risk aversion,
overconfidence, herding behavior, loss aversion, and more that influence investors in Bangalore.
It seeks to understand how these factors shape their investment choices. The research investigates
the impact of behavioral factors on investment outcomes. This includes assessing how these factors
affect portfolio returns, risk management strategies, and overall investment success.

41
The study explores whether certain demographic characteristics, such as age, income level, and
experience, correlate with specific behavioral tendencies in Bangalore's investor population.
Ultimately, the research aims to provide actionable insights for investors in Bangalore. It seeks to
offer guidance on how to navigate and manage behavioral biases effectively to optimize portfolio
management.

3.4 SCOPE OF THE STUDY:

The research aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on behavioral finance. It seeks
to provide region-specific insights by focusing on Bangalore, a city known for its unique
investment opportunities and demographic diversity. By uncovering the behavioral factors at play
in this context, the study can offer valuable guidance for investors navigating the financial
landscape in Bangalore.

3.5 RESEARCH DESIGN

This study uses cross-sectional, descriptive and mixed-methods design. The questionnaire was
designed to capture information on behavioral factors and demographic variables relevant to
investment decisions. It was administered online through a secure survey platform. The data is
collected from individuals of Bangalore.
Sample Area – Bengaluru
Sampling Technique – Convenience Sampling

3.6 DATA COLLECTION

Data for this study were collected using a structured questionnaire administered to a diverse sample
of individuals actively involved in the stock market. Participants were recruited using a
convenience sampling approach. Invitations to participate were extended through social media
platforms. This method was chosen for its practicality in reaching a wide range of participants with
varying degrees of experience in the stock market.

42
Participants were invited to take part in the study without any financial incentives. They were
informed about the voluntary nature of their participation and the study's focus on understanding
investment behavior and demographic characteristics.

Informed consent was obtained from all participants. They were assured that their responses would
remain confidential and that no personal identifying information would be collected.

The questionnaire underwent rigorous development and validation processes. It was designed to
capture information on behavioral factors and demographic variables relevant to investment
decisions. A pilot test involving a small group of individuals was conducted to refine the
questionnaire's clarity and effectiveness.

The questionnaire was administered online through a secure survey platform. It was available for
participants to complete over a month period, allowing ample time for responses. No in-person
interviews were conducted. Participants' anonymity and the confidentiality of their responses were
ensured. No personal identifying information was collected, and survey responses were stored
securely.

Data collected through the questionnaire underwent validation checks to ensure data quality and
consistency. These checks included identifying and addressing missing or inconsistent responses.
Collected data were securely stored and managed in electronic format. Data cleaning procedures
were performed to prepare the dataset for analysis.

3.7 TOOLS OF ANALYSIS

The collected data underwent a thorough data preparation process, which included data cleaning
to address missing or inconsistent responses and data coding to ensure uniformity in variable
formats. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize key findings from the questionnaire
data. Mean values, standard deviations, and frequency distributions were calculated for relevant
variables, providing an overview of participant characteristics and investment behavior. To test
hypotheses and explore relationships between variables, inferential statistics were used.
Specifically, a series of ANOVA tests were conducted to examine associations between

43
demographic variables (e.g., age, education) and behavioral factors (e.g., loss aversion, risk
perception).

3.8 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

It is important to acknowledge that while the data analysis provides valuable insights, there are
inherent limitations in the study.

 One limitation of the study is the reliance on convenience sampling. Participants were recruited
through social media and interest groups, which may introduce sampling bias. Those who
voluntarily participated may not be representative of the entire population of investors in
Bangalore. This limits the generalizability of the findings.

 The study employed a cross-sectional design, collecting data at a single point in time. This
design is limited in its ability to establish causality or capture changes over time. It provides a
snapshot of investor behavior and demographics but cannot reveal how these factors evolve.

 The data relied on self-reported responses from participants. This introduces the potential for
social desirability bias, where participants may provide answers they believe are socially
acceptable or desirable, leading to inaccuracies in the data. Additionally, self-reported data may
not always align with actual behavior.

 The study focused on a specific set of behavioral factors (e.g., loss aversion, risk perception,
overconfidence). While these factors are important, other psychological and behavioral
variables, such as cognitive biases or emotional influences, were not explored. The study's
scope may not encompass the full spectrum of behavioral determinants of investment
decisions.

 There were participants who did not respond to the questionnaire. Non-response bias may exist
if non-respondents differ systematically from respondents in terms of their behavioral factors
or investment outcomes. This could impact the external validity of the study.

44
 The findings may have limited generalizability beyond Bangalore, as investment behavior can
be influenced by regional economic conditions, cultural factors, and market dynamics. Caution
should be exercised when applying these findings to other geographical areas.

 Data were collected over one month period, which may not capture seasonal variations or long-
term trends in investment behavior. Short-term fluctuations in market conditions during the
data collection period could influence responses.

45
CHAPTER IV
DATA ANALYSIS

46
4.1 BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO THE TOOL/TECHNIQUE USED FOR ANALYSIS

The statistical tool or technique used for the analysis is descriptive statistics, which involves
summarizing and presenting the main features of a dataset. Descriptive statistics, such as mean,
median, standard deviation, and range, were utilized to summarize the dataset. For inferential
statistics, the study employed one-way ANOVA to determine the relationships between variables.

One-Way ANOVA is a statistical technique used to compare means among three or more groups.
It determines whether there are any significant differences between the means of the groups in a
single independent variable (hence "One-Way"). The analysis involves partitioning the total
variability into components attributable to different sources, such as between-group variability and
within-group variability.

Fisher's F-test is a statistical test used in ANOVA to evaluate whether the means of several groups
are equal or significantly different. It calculates the ratio of the variance between groups to the
variance within groups. A larger F-statistic suggests that the variability between groups is
significant compared to the variability within groups.

The analysis was carried out using Jamovi software version 2.4.8, known for its practicality and
user-friendly interface. This software facilitated the processing of data and the execution of various
analyses, including descriptive analysis.

47
4.2 RESULT OF DATA ANALYSIS
4.2.1 : Demographic and investment profile of respondents in stock market
Respondents
Items
Number Percentage

Gender Male 36 54%


Female 30 45%
20 to 30 48 72%
30 to 40 16 24%
Age
40 to 50 1 2%
50 & above 1 2%
Diploma or equivalent 4 6%
Bachelor's or equivalent 18 27%
Education
Master's or Equivalent 35 52%
Others 9 13%
Below INR 3,00,000 34 51%
INR 3,00,000 to INR
5,00,000 18 27%
Annual Income
INR 5,00,000 to INR
10,00,000 7 10%
Above INR 10,00,000 7 10%
Yes 56 84%
Invest in Stock Market
No 10 15%
Yes 18 27%
Stock Market Course
No 48 72%
Less than 1 year 35 52%
Participation in stock 1 to 3 years 22 33%
market 3 to 5 years 7 10%
5 to 10 years 2 3%

48
INTERPRETATION
4.2.2 : Pie chart showing gender of respondents

Gender

45% Male
55% Female

Gender: The respondents were primarily male (54%) and female (45%), with a slightly higher
representation of males.

4.2.3 : Pie chart showing age of respondents

Age

12%% 20 to 30
24%
30 to 40
40 to 50
73% 50 & above

Age: The majority of respondents (72%) were aged 20-30 years.

4.2.4 : Pie chart showing level of education of respondents

Level of Education

Diploma or
equivalent
14% 6%
Bachelor’s degree
27% or equivalent
Master’s degree
or equivalent
53%
Others

49
Education level: Most respondents had a Master's degree or its equivalent (52%), followed by
Bachelor's or equivalent (27%). A smaller percentage had a Diploma or equivalent (6%).

4.2.5 : Pie chart showing annual income of respondents

Annual Income

Below INR
3,00,000
11%
INR 3,00,000 to
11%
INR 5,00,000
51%
INR 5,00,000 to
27% INR 10,00,000
Above INR
10,00,000

Annual Income: Most respondents had an annual income below INR 3,00,000 (51%). A significant
portion fell within the INR 3,00,000 to INR 5,00,000 bracket (27%).

4.2.6 : Pie chart showing participation of respondents in stock market

Do you invest in the


stock market?

15%
Yes
No
85%

Investment in stock market: A large majority of respondents (84%) reported investing in the stock
market, while a smaller percentage (15%) did not.

4.2.7 : Pie chart showing whether respondents have attended any course in stock market

50
Have you attended any course of stock
market?

27%
Yes
No
73%

Stock market course: Approximately 27% of respondents had taken a stock market course,
demonstrating an interest in enhancing their stock market knowledge.

4.2.8 : Pie chart showing experience in stock market of respondents

How long have you been participating in the


stock market?

3%
Less than 1 year
11%
1 to 3 years
53%
33% 3 to 5 years
5 to 10 years

Experience in stock market participation: More than half of the respondents (52%) reported having
less than 1 year of experience in the stock market, suggesting a substantial number of newcomers
or those with minimal exposure. About one-third had 1 to 3 years of experience.

51
LOSS AVERSION

4.2.9 : Discriptive table showing loss aversion behaviour of respondents in Bengaluru


Loss Aversion
N Mean SD Skewness SE
Large price drops in my
invested stocks make me 66 2.36 1.076 0.9 0.295
nervous

I will avoid increasing my


investment when the 65 2.78 1.218 0.321 0.297
market performs poorly

I will not sell shares that


have observed a decline in
66 2.26 0.966 0.828 0.295
value whereas sell shares
that have a rise in value

INTERPRETATION

4.2.10 : Pie chart showing loss aversion behavior of respondents

Large price drops in my invested stocks make me


nervous

6% Strongly Agree
9% 18%
Agree
18% Neutral
Disagree
49% Strongly Disagree

The mean (2.36) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that large price drops in
their invested stocks make them nervous. The skewness (0.9) indicates a moderate rightward skew,
suggesting that more responses are inclined towards agreement with this statement.

52
4.2.11 : Pie chart showing loss aversion behavior of respondents

I will avoid increasing my investment when the


market performs poorly

9% Strongly Agree
12%
Agree
25% Neutral
40% Disagree
14%
Strongly Disagree

The mean (2.78) suggests that, on average, respondents agree to some extent that they will avoid
increasing their investment when the market performs poorly. The skewness (0.321) indicates a
slight rightward skew, meaning more responses tend towards agreement.

4.2.12 : Pie chart showing loss aversion behavior of respondents

I will not sell shares that have observed a decline in


value whereas sell shares that have a rise in value

Strongly Agree
8%3% 20%
Agree
21%
Neutral
Disagree
48% Strongly Disagree

The mean (2.26) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that they will not sell
shares that have observed a decline in value but will sell shares that have a rise in value. The
skewness (0.828) indicates a moderate rightward skew, suggesting more responses are inclined
towards agreement with this statement.

4.2.13 : Table showing loss aversion behaviour of respondents in Bengaluru


One-Way ANOVA (Fisher's)
53
Loss Aversion F df1 df2 p
Large price drops in my invested stocks make me 2.78 3 62 0.048
nervous
I will avoid increasing my investment when the 1.54 3 61 0.213
market performs poorly
I will not sell shares that have observed a decline 3.33 3 62 0.025
in value whereas sell shares that have a rise in
value

1. The p-value (0.048) is less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant difference.
Therefore, there is evidence to suggest that the response to large price drops in invested
stocks differs significantly across the groups.
2. The p-value (0.213) is greater than 0.05, suggesting that there is no statistically significant
difference in the responses to this statement across the groups.
3. The p-value (0.025) is less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant difference.
Therefore, there is evidence to suggest that the response to selling shares based on their
value changes differs significantly across the groups.

54
RISK PERCEPTION

4.2.14 : Discriptive table showing risk perception of respondents in Bengaluru


Risk Perception
N Mean SD Skewness SE
I generally do not have a 65 2.35 0.943 0.611 0.297
fear of capitalizing on
stocks with a certain gain
I am careful about stocks 66 2.12 1 0.892 0.295
that show unexpected
fluctuations in price or
transaction
I generally have concerns 65 2.17 0.977 0.685 0.297
about investing in stocks
with a historical adverse
performance in trading
I do not consider the idea of 66 3.11 1.217 -0.262 0.295
trading in the stock market
attractive

INTERPRETATION

4.2.15 : Pie chart showing risk perception of respondents

I generally do not have a fear of capitalizing on


stocks with a certain gain

3%
Strongly Agree
17%
6% Agree
31% Neutral

43% Disagree
Strongly Disagree

55
The mean (2.35) suggests that, on average, respondents agree to some extent that they do not have
a fear of capitalizing on stocks with a certain gain. The skewness (0.611) indicates a moderate
rightward skew, suggesting that more responses tend towards agreement.

4.2.16 : Pie chart showing risk perception of respondents

I am careful about stocks that show unexpected


fluctuations in price or transaction

3% Strongly Agree
6% 29% Agree
20%
Neutral
Disagree
42%
Strongly Disagree

The mean (2.12) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that they are careful about
stocks that show unexpected fluctuations in price or transaction. The skewness (0.892) indicates a
moderate rightward skew, suggesting that more responses tend towards agreement.

4.2.17 : Pie chart showing risk perception of respondents

I generally have concerns about investing in stocks


with a historical adverse performance in trading

Strongly Agree
9%
26% Agree
20%
Neutral
Disagree
43%
Strongly Disagree

The mean (2.17) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that they have concerns
about investing in stocks with a historical adverse performance in trading. The skewness (0.685)
indicates a moderate rightward skew, suggesting more responses tend towards agreement.

56
4.2.18 : Pie chart showing risk perception of respondents

I do not consider the idea of trading in the stock


market attractive

11% Strongly Agree


12%
Agree
21% Neutral
35%
Disagree
21%
Strongly Disagree

The mean (3.11) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that they do not consider
the idea of trading in the stock market attractive. The skewness (-0.262) indicates a slight leftward
skew, suggesting a mild tendency towards disagreement.

4.2.19 : Table showing risk perception of respondents in Bengaluru


One-Way ANOVA (Fisher's)
Risk Perception F df1 df2 p
I generally do not have a fear of capitalizing on 0.2632 3 61 0.852
stocks with a certain gain
I am careful about stocks that show unexpected 0.0582 3 62 0.981
fluctuations in price or transaction
I generally have concerns about investing in 0.755 3 61 0.524
stocks with a historical adverse performance in
trading
I do not consider the idea of trading in the stock 1.2462 3 62 0.301
market attractive

57
1. The p-value (0.852) is greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no statistically significant
difference in the responses to this statement across the groups. In other words, there is no
strong evidence to suggest that responses to this statement significantly vary among the
groups.
2. The p-value (0.981) is much greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no statistically
significant difference in the responses to this statement across the groups. Therefore, there
is no strong evidence to suggest that responses to this statement significantly vary among
the groups.
3. The p-value (0.524) is greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no statistically significant
difference in the responses to this statement across the groups. Thus, there is no strong
evidence to suggest that responses to this statement significantly vary among the groups.
4. The p-value (0.301) is greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no statistically significant
difference in the responses to this statement across the groups. There is no strong evidence
to suggest that responses to this statement significantly vary among the groups.

58
OVERCONFIDENCE

4.2.20 : Discriptive table showing overconfidence behaviour of respondents in Bengaluru

Overconfidence
N Mean SD Skewness SE
I sense more assurance in my 66 2.2 1.01 0.4181 0.295
own investment views over
others
I do not look up to others in 66 2.74 1.14 0.2085 0.295
case of making investment
decisions
I am certain of my expertise 65 2.88 1.01 -0.124 0.297
and experience in outpacing
the stock market

I am successful in an 66 2.95 1.06 0.0928 0.295


environment where others
fail

INTERPRETATION
4.2.21 : Pie chart showing overconfidence behavior of respondents

I sense more assurance in my own investment


views over others

Strongly Agree
8%
Agree
30%
30% Neutral
Disagree
30%
Strongly Disagree

59
The mean (2.2) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that they have more
assurance in their own investment views over others. The skewness (0.4181) indicates a moderate
rightward skew, suggesting more responses tend towards agreement.

4.2.22 : Pie chart showing overconfidence behavior of respondents

I do not look up to others in case of making


investment decisions

Strongly Agree
8% 15%
17% Agree
Neutral
27%
Disagree
33%
Strongly Disagree

The mean (2.74) suggests that, on average, respondents agree to some extent that they do not look
up to others when making investment decisions. The skewness (0.2085) indicates a slight
rightward skew, suggesting more responses tend towards agreement.

4.2.23 : Pie chart showing overconfidence behavior of respondents

I am certain of my expertise and experience in


outpacing the stock market

Strongly Agree
5%11%
20% Agree
20%
Neutral
Disagree
44%
Strongly Disagree

60
The mean (2.88) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that they are certain of
their expertise and experience in outpacing the stock market. The skewness (-0.124) indicates a
nearly symmetrical distribution.

4.2.24 : Pie chart showing overconfidence behavior of respondents

I am successful in an environment where others fail

Strongly Agree
9% 9%
Agree
17% 21%
Neutral
Disagree
44% Strongly Disagree

The mean (2.95) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that they are successful
in an environment where others fail. The skewness (0.0928) indicates a distribution that is
relatively symmetrical.

4.2.25 : Table showing overconfidence behaviour of respondents in Bengaluru


One-Way ANOVA (Fisher's)
Overconfidence F df1 df2 p
I sense more assurance in my own investment 0.441 3 62 0.724
views over others
I do not look up to others in case of making 0.368 3 62 0.776
investment decisions
I am certain of my expertise and experience in 0.287 3 61 0.835
outpacing the stock market

I am successful in an environment where others 1.1 3 62 0.356


fail

61
1. The p-value (0.724) is much greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no statistically
significant difference in the responses to this statement across the groups. In other words,
there is no strong evidence to suggest that responses to this statement significantly vary
among the groups.
2. The p-value (0.776) is much greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no statistically
significant difference in the responses to this statement across the groups. Therefore, there
is no strong evidence to suggest that responses to this statement significantly vary among
the groups.
3. The p-value (0.835) is much greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no statistically
significant difference in the responses to this statement across the groups. Thus, there is no
strong evidence to suggest that responses to this statement significantly vary among the
groups.
4. The p-value (0.356) is greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no statistically significant
difference in the responses to this statement across the groups. There is no strong evidence
to suggest that responses to this statement significantly vary among the groups.

62
HERDING

4.2.26 : Discriptive table showing herding behaviour of respondents in Bengaluru


Herding
N Mean SD Skewness SE
My investment choices are 66 2.68 1.05 0.354 0.295
affected by the choices of
choosing stocks of other
investors
My investment choices are 66 2.92 1.09 0.303 0.295
affected by the choices of the
stock volume of other
investors
My investment decisions are 66 2.68 1.08 0.374 0.295
affected by the decisions of
buying and selling stocks of
other investors
I generally respond fast to 66 2.97 1.14 0.191 0.295
the fluctuations of other
investors' choices and track
their responses to the stock
market

INTERPRETATION
4.2.27 : Pie chart showing herding behavior of respondents

My investment choices are affected by the choices


of choosing stocks of other investors

Strongly Agree
4%11%
20% Agree
Neutral
39%
26% Disagree
Strongly Disagree

63
The mean (2.68) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that their investment
choices are affected by the choices of choosing stocks made by other investors. The skewness
(0.354) indicates a moderate rightward skew, suggesting more responses tend towards agreement.

4.2.28 : Pie chart showing herding behavior of respondents

My investment choices are affected by the choices


of the stock volume of other investors

8%4% Strongly Agree


Agree
27%
41% Neutral
Disagree
20% Strongly Disagree

The mean (2.92) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that their investment
choices are affected by the choices of stock volume made by other investors. The skewness (0.303)
indicates a moderate rightward skew, suggesting more responses tend towards agreement.

4.2.29 : Pie chart showing herding behavior of respondents

My investment decisions are affected by the


decisions of buying and selling stocks of other
investors

Strongly Agree
6%12%
17% Agree
Neutral
36%
29% Disagree
Strongly Disagree

64
The mean (2.68) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that their investment
decisions are affected by the decisions of buying and selling stocks made by other investors. The
skewness (0.374) indicates a moderate rightward skew, suggesting more responses tend towards
agreement.

4.2.30 : Pie chart showing herding behavior of respondents

I generally respond fast to the fluctuations of other


investors' choices and track their responses to the
stock market

Strongly Agree
12% 9%
Agree
17% 26% Neutral
Disagree
36% Strongly Disagree

The mean (2.97) suggests that, on average, respondents somewhat agree that they generally
respond fast to the fluctuations of other investors' choices and track their responses to the stock
market. The skewness (0.191) indicates a distribution that is relatively symmetrical.

4.2.31 : Table showing herding behaviour of respondents in Bengaluru


One-Way ANOVA (Fisher's)
Herding F df1 df2 p
My investment choices are affected by the 0.664 3 62 0.577
choices of choosing stocks of other investors
My investment choices are affected by the 1.711 3 62 0.174
choices of the stock volume of other investors

65
My investment decisions are affected by the 0.911 3 62 0.441
decisions of buying and selling stocks of other
investors
I generally respond fast to the fluctuations of 2.661 3 62 0.056
other investors' choices and track their responses
to the stock market

1. The p-value (0.577) is greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no statistically significant
difference in the responses to this statement across the groups. In other words, there is no
strong evidence to suggest that responses to this statement significantly vary among the
groups.
2. The p-value (0.174) is greater than 0.05 but relatively close, suggesting that there might be
a weak indication of a statistically significant difference in the responses to this statement
across the groups. However, it's not strong evidence, and further investigation may be
needed.
3. The p-value (0.441) is greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no statistically significant
difference in the responses to this statement across the groups. Thus, there is no strong
evidence to suggest that responses to this statement significantly vary among the groups.
4. The p-value (0.056) is slightly less than 0.05 but not quite reaching the typical significance
level. It suggests that there may be a weak indication of a statistically significant difference
in the responses to this statement across the groups. However, caution is needed in
interpreting this result as it's borderline significant.

66
PORTFOLIO RETURNS
4.2.32 : Pie chart showing portfolio returns of respondents

Portfolio Returns: In the last year, how would you


rate the performance of your investment portfolio?

12%
21%
Excellent
Good
Fair
37%
30% Poor

The highest proportion of portfolio returns is classified as "Good" (36.4%), followed by "Fair"
(30.3%) and "Poor" (21.2%). Conversely, "Excellent" returns account for a smaller portion
(12.1%) of the total portfolio returns. This distribution underscores the prevalence of above-
average to satisfactory returns, with a relatively lower proportion of exceptionally high returns.

67
4.2.33 : Table showing hypothesis analysis

Hypothesis Portfolio Performance


Loss Aversion H0: Loss Aversion do not significantly
0.048 < 0.05
influence portfolio performance in Bangalore
H1: Loss Aversion significantly influence Accept Alternate
portfolio performance in Bangalore Hypothesis
Risk Perception H0: Risk Perception do not significantly
0.981 > 0.05
influence portfolio performance in Bangalore
H1: Risk Perception significantly influence Accept the Null
portfolio performance in Bangalore Hypothesis
Overconfidence H0: Overconfidence do not significantly
0.076 > 0.05
influence portfolio performance in Bangalore
H1: Overconfidence significantly influence Accept Null Hypothesis
portfolio performance in Bangalore
Herding H0: Herding do not significantly influence
0.441 > 0.05
portfolio performance in Bangalore.
H1: Herding significantly influence portfolio Accept Null Hypothesis
performance in Bangalore.

68
CHAPTER V
FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS, AND CONCLUSIONS

69
5.1 DISCUSSION/FINDINGS
1. The data shows that 54% of respondents are male, while 45% are female. Research
suggests that gender may influence risk perception and investment decisions.
2. Respondents with higher education levels (Bachelor's and Master's) might demonstrate
more informed investment decisions.
3. The 27% who have taken a stock market course may have a different approach compared
to those without any formal training.
4. The majority of respondents (72%) fall within the 20 to 30 age group, suggesting that a
significant portion of investors may be relatively young and less experienced in the stock
market. This might influence their risk appetite and investment strategies.
5. Considering the age distribution and experience levels, it's plausible that a significant
portion may be experiencing initial stages of their investment journey.
6. Notably, 51% of respondents with an annual income below INR 3,00,000 invest in the
stock market. This suggests that individuals with lower incomes also participate,
indicating a potential aspiration for wealth creation or financial literacy.
7. The objectives of analyzing behavioral factors, examining investment outcomes,
identifying demographic trends, and providing insights for investors are on track, with
data and analysis aligning with these objectives.

5.2 SUGGESTIONS
1. Encouraging more investors to take stock market courses could lead to more informed
investment decisions and potentially better outcomes. Educational initiatives focusing on
investment strategies and risk management may be beneficial.
2. Providing tailored investment guidance based on demographic characteristics can help
investors make more informed decisions. For example, considering risk tolerance based
on income levels or investment duration based on age.
3. Encourage younger individuals (20-30 age group) to start investing early by highlighting
the potential advantages of long-term investments. Emphasize the power of compounding
and the benefits of a longer investment horizon.
4. Offer easily accessible and affordable stock market courses, especially targeting those
with lower income levels. Make these courses available online or through community
centers to ensure a broader reach.
5. Facilitate platforms or events where experienced investors can share their investment
journey and experiences. This can motivate and provide valuable insights to those who
are new to investing.
6. Organize regular investment workshops and seminars covering various investment
strategies, risk management techniques, and market trends. These workshops should cater
to different experience levels, from beginners to experienced investors.

70
5.3 CONCLUSION
Bangalore's burgeoning status as an investment hub underscores the importance of effective
portfolio management in maximizing returns while managing risks. The primary objective of this
study is to explore the influence of behavioral factors on portfolio management within
Bangalore's diverse demographic.

The analysis highlights loss aversion as a critical behavioral factor impacting portfolio
performance. The observation that investors experience nervousness during significant price
drops emphasizes the role of emotions in decision-making. Understanding and addressing this
aversion can be pivotal in managing investments, especially during market downturns. The study
indicates that risk perception, overconfidence, and herding behavior did not significantly
influence portfolio performance in this context. The lack of significant impact suggests that
while these factors are important to consider, they might not have a direct effect on investment
outcomes in the Bangalore market.

The findings underscore the need for tailored investment strategies that acknowledge and address
loss aversion. Portfolio managers and financial advisors in Bangalore should be trained to
manage and mitigate the impact of loss aversion effectively. The study emphasizes the potential
of educational initiatives to inform investors about these behavioral biases and aid in making
more informed investment decisions. Awareness campaigns and educational programs could
focus on mitigating loss aversion and other behavioral biases, promoting rational decision-
making. Acknowledging the study's limitations, including its cross-sectional design and reliance
on self-reported data, is essential. The limitations highlight the need for future research to adopt
more robust methodologies to capture a comprehensive understanding of investment behavior.

The study recommends adopting a longitudinal approach in future research to track investment
behavior over time, offering a more in-depth analysis. Additionally, future research should
incorporate a broader spectrum of behavioral aspects to comprehensively understand the
complexities of investment decision-making.

In conclusion, understanding and managing behavioral factors, particularly loss aversion, are
critical in achieving optimal portfolio performance in Bangalore's dynamic investment
landscape. The study underscores the importance of targeted educational initiatives and tailored
investment strategies to empower investors and enhance their decision-making abilities.

71
5.4 REFERENCE:

 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335901585_Optimization_of_investment_portf
olio_management
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372442855_AN_ANALYZE_THE_INVESTM
ENT_BEHAVIORS_AND_STRATEGIES_OF_WOMEN_INVESTORS
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290010196_Long-
term_portfolio_investments_New_insight_into_return_and_risk
 https://shodhgangotri.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/2774/3/03_%20literature%20re
view.pdf
 https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PRR-10-2021-0054/full/html
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371821872_PSYCHOLOGY_OF_FINANCE_
AND_BEHAVIORAL_FINANCE_POINTS_OF_CONTACT_AND_DIFFERENCES
 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2210032
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362468085_Financial_Revolution_From_Tradit
ional_Finance_to_Behavioral_and_Neuro-finance
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343035593_Indian_Behavioral_Finance_Revie
w_of_Empirical_Evidence
 http://eprints.utar.edu.my/4322/1/fyp_FN_2020_CHX_-_1800232.pdf
 https://www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/ijafr/article/view/1040
 https://academic.oup.com/book/11905/chapter-
abstract/161107140?redirectedFrom=fulltext
 http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:24424/FULLTEXT01
 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846088/full
 https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PRR-10-2021-0054/full/html
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371821872_PSYCHOLOGY_OF_FINANCE_
AND_BEHAVIORAL_FINANCE_POINTS_OF_CONTACT_AND_DIFFERENCES
 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2210032
 chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.diva-
portal.org/smash/get/diva2:423263/FULLTEXT02.pdf
 https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:423263/FULLTEXT02.pdf
 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050922011139
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362468085_Financial_Revolution_From_Tradit
ional_Finance_to_Behavioral_and_Neuro-finance

IX
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343035593_Indian_Behavioral_Finance_Revie
w_of_Empirical_Evidence
 http://eprints.utar.edu.my/4322/1/fyp_FN_2020_CHX_-_1800232.pdf
 https://www.cribfb.com/journal/index.php/ijafr/article/view/1040
 https://academic.oup.com/book/11905/chapter-
abstract/161107140?redirectedFrom=fulltext
 http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:24424/FULLTEXT01
 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846088/full
 https://www.icmai-rnj.in/index.php/rb/article/view/117453/0
 https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD1907016.pdf
 https://www.oecd.org/finance/financial-education/49319977.pdf

X
ANNEXURE 1

A STUDY ON INFLUENCE OF BEHAVIORAL FACTORS ON


PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT IN BENGALURU
ORIGINALITY REPORT

15 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
13%
INTERNET SOURCES
9%
PUBLICATIONS
10%
STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

1
www.emerald.com
Internet Source 6%
2
"The Quintessence of Basic and Clinical
Research and Scientific Publishing", Springer
1%
Science and Business Media LLC, 2023
Publication

3
www.financestrategists.com
Internet Source 1%
4
minds.wisconsin.edu
Internet Source 1%
5
core.ac.uk
Internet Source <1 %
6
etd.uwc.ac.za
Internet Source <1 %
7
Submitted to Manipal University
Student Paper <1 %
8
Submitted to University of Northampton
Student Paper <1 %

XI
ANNEXURE 2

XIII
ANNEXURE 3

QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A – GENERAL INFORMATION

1. Gender
a) Male
b) Female
c) Other

2. Age
a) Less than 20
b) 20 to 30
c) 30 to 40
d) 40 to 50
e) 50 & above

3. What level of education have you completed?


a) High school or lower
b) Diploma or equivalent
c) Bachelor’s degree or equivalent
d) Master’s degree or equivalent
e) Others

4. Estimate your average monthly income (Rupees)


a) Below INR 3,00,000
b) INR 3,00,000 to INR 5,00,000
c) INR 5,00,000 to INR 10,00,000
d) Above INR 10,00,000

5. Do you invest in the stock market?


a) Yes
b) No

6. Have you attended any course of stock exchange?


a) Yes
b) No

7. How long have you been participating in the stock market?


a) Less than 1 year
b) 1 to 3 years
c) 3 to 5 years

XIII
d) 5 to 10 years
e) Over 10 years

SECTION B - BEHAVIORAL FACTORS INFLUENCING INVESTMENT


DECISIONS

Loss aversion

8. Large price drops in my invested stocks make me nervous


a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

9. I will avoid increasing my investment when the market performs poorly


a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

10. I will not sell shares that have observed a decline in value whereas sell
shares that have a rise in value
a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

Risk perception

11. I generally do not have a fear of capitalizing on stocks with a certain gain
a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

12. I am careful about stocks that show unexpected fluctuations in price or


transaction
a) Strongly Agree

XIV
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

13. I generally have concerns about investing in stocks with a historical adverse
performance in trading
a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

14. I do not consider the idea of trading in the stock market attractive
a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

Overconfidence

15. I sense more assurance in my own investment views over others


a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

16. I do not look up to others in case of making investment decisions


a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

17. I am certain of my expertise and experience in outpacing the stock market


a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

XV
18. I am successful in an environment where others fail
a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

Herding

19. My investment choices are affected by the choices of choosing stocks of


other investors
a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

20. My investment choices are affected by the choices of the stock volume of
other investors
a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

21. My investment decisions are affected by the decisions of buying and selling
stocks of other investors
a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

22. I generally respond fast to the fluctuations of other investors' choices and
track their responses to the stock market
a) Strongly Agree
b) Agree
c) Neutral
d) Disagree
e) Strongly Disagree

Portfolio Performance:

XVI
23. Portfolio Returns: In the last year, how would you rate the performance of
your investment portfolio?

a) Excellent
b) Good
c) Fair
d) Poor
e) Very Poor

XVII

You might also like