MIDTERM

REPORT
NAME: LUONG GIA KHANH (BRIDGET)

STUDENT CODE: 09913970

CLASS: 91402

LECTURER: Dr. Joe Lavallee

 DATE SUBMITTED:

I. My Focus Job & Why I chose it

In general, it is reported that the Interest Results - O*NET Interest Profiler are as follows:

Realistic: 15
Investigative: 38
Artistic: 31
Social: 32
Enterprising: 32
Conventional: 27

My primary focus is Aerospace Engineering, which aligns with my highest score in the
Investigative category, scoring 38. This indicates my strong interest in gathering facts and
analyzing problems, coupled with proficient analytical thinking and problem-solving abilities.

What does the job involve?

Aerospace engineering involves applying scientific, economic, social, and practical
knowledge to design, construct, and maintain aircraft or spacecraft structures, machines, and
systems. The design process requires a thorough understanding of models and selecting the right
resolution to address challenges, meeting the needs of passengers, military, and emergency
response vehicles, while also exploring new possibilities. Aerospace engineering encompasses
various activities across industries, including airlines and military air forces, among others

To pursue a career as an Aerospace Engineer, students must possess the ability to identify
technical challenges and devise solutions through comprehensive research and systematic
understanding of models. Additionally, Aerospace engineers are tasked with advancing beyond
research to develop refined products, rigorously testing the performance of aircraft and
spacecraft prototypes. Throughout the manufacturing process, Aerospace engineers play a
critical role in ensuring efficiency and effectiveness to sustain the continuous development of
aerospace products.

Reasons to choose
The main motivation behind choosing Aerospace Engineering is my aspiration to
establish a startup company focused on manufacturing aircraft components. I plan to pursue this
goal after acquiring 5 to 8 years of experience in the business field.

As a senior student, my career ambition lies in crafting the Optimal Safe Aircraft System
and its associated components. This journey entails delving into intricate systems, conducting
thorough research, and applying scientific principles to aviation and aeronautical systems. I'm
passionately driven to bolster my knowledge to tackle real-world challenges and mitigate
potential incidents, such as aircraft or spacecraft accidents, after an extensive study of various
global incidents.

By applying mathematics and physics to aerospace technologies, I aim to gain insights

into Aerospace mechanics, fluid dynamics, aerodynamics, structures, materials, and air
transportation. This foundational knowledge will empower me to innovate optimal aircraft
designs aimed at minimizing accidental risks and ensuring passenger comfort and safety in the
future.

My pursuit of a career in Aerospace Engineering is fueled not only by academic and

professional interests but also by a fervent passion for utilizing inquiry and analytical reasoning
to mitigate accidental risks and ensure passenger safety.

II. Exposure of My Focus Job to Gen AI

Generative AI and the impact on Aerospace Engineering:

Generative AI has brought about a significant transformation across industries, including

aerospace engineering. It excels in generating original content such as images, videos, text, and
code by leveraging extensive training data. For instance, Generative Design integrates
advancements in Generative Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing to reshape the design
process. This enables engineers to shift their focus to other manufacturing stages while
Generative AI efficiently produces instrument designs. Overall, Generative AI has a substantial
impact on high-skilled workers, optimizing their tasks, but its influence on less experienced and
low-skilled workers may be comparatively limited.
 - Table with tasks and ratings (E0, E1, E2) from you, ChatGPT and your final rating
after considering ChatGPT’s input

Job: Aerospace Engineer

ChatGP
T
No. Task E0, E1 E0, E1 Agree = Final
or E2? or E2? 1 decision
1 Formulate mathematical models or other methods of computer E1 E2 E2
analysis to develop, evaluate, or modify design, according to
customer engineering requirements.

2 Plan or conduct experimental, environmental, operational, or E2 E0 E2

stress tests on models or prototypes of aircraft or aerospace
systems or equipment.
3 Formulate conceptual design of aeronautical or aerospace E1 E0 E1
products or systems to meet customer requirements or
conform to environmental regulations.
4 Plan or coordinate investigation and resolution of customers' E1 E0 E1
reports of technical problems with aircraft or aerospace
vehicles.
5 Write technical reports or other documentation, such as E0 E1 E1
handbooks or bulletins, for use by engineering staff,
management, or customers.
6 Direct or coordinate activities of engineering or technical E0 E0 1 E0
personnel involved in designing, fabricating, modifying, or
testing of aircraft or aerospace products.
7 Evaluate product data or design from inspections or reports for E0 E0 1 E0
conformance to engineering principles, customer
requirements, environmental regulations, or quality standards.
8 Develop design criteria for aeronautical or aerospace products E1 E0 E1
or systems, including testing methods, production costs,
quality standards, environmental standards, or completion
dates.
9 Analyze project requests, proposals, or engineering data to E2 E0 E1
determine feasibility, productibility, cost, or production time
of aerospace or aeronautical products.
10 Maintain records of performance reports for future reference. E0 E1 E0
11 Diagnose performance problems by reviewing reports or E0 E0 1 E0
documentation from customers or field engineers or by
inspecting malfunctioning or damaged products.
12 Direct aerospace research and development programs. E0 E0 1 E0
13 Research new materials to determine quality or conformance E0 E0 1 E0
to environmental standards.

14 Evaluate and approve selection of vendors by studying past E2 E0 E0

performance or new advertisements.

15 Review aerospace engineering designs to determine how to E2 E0 E2

reduce negative environmental impacts.
16 Design new or modify existing aerospace systems to reduce E1 E0 E1
polluting emissions, such as nitrogen oxide, carbon monoxide,
or smoke emissions.
17 Design or engineer filtration systems that reduce harmful E1 E0 E1
emissions.
18 Evaluate biofuel performance specifications to determine E2 E0 E0
feasibility for aerospace applications.

CALCULATE THE EXPOSURE SCORE:

- Exact agreement percentage between initial rating and ChatGPT rating is 27.78%.

Initial task rating: For the 18 tasks in the table above, the result is recognized as.

E0 = __7___ / 18 = 38.89%
E1 = __6___ / 18 = 33.33%
E2 = ___4__ / 18 = 22.22%

Lower Bound Estimate

LBE = E1 Tasks / 18
33.33%
Middle Estimate
ME = (E1 + (0.5 * E2)) / 18
44.4%

Upper Bound Estimate

UBE = (E1 + E2) / 18
55.56%

ChatGPT: For the 18 tasks in the table above, the result is recognized as.

E0 = __15___ / 18 = 83.33%
E1 = __2__ / 18 = 33.33%
E2 = __1_ / 18 = 22.22%

Lower Bound Estimate

LBE = E1 Tasks / 18
11.1%

Middle Estimate
ME = (E1 + (0.5 * E2)) / 18
13.89%

Upper Bound Estimate

UBE = (E1 + E2) / 18
16.67%

Final rating: For the 18 tasks in the table above, the result is recognized as.

E0 = __8__ / 18 = 44.44%
E1 = __7__ / 18 = 38.89%
E2 = ___3_ / 18 = 16.67%

Lower Bound Estimate

LBE = E1 Tasks / 18 = 38.89%

Middle Estimate
ME = (E1 + (0.5 * E2)) / 18 = 47.22%

Upper Bound Estimate

 UBE = (E1 + E2) / 18 = 55.56%

- Briefly interpret and discuss.

First and foremost, the exact agreement percentage of 27.78% represents the low level of
consensus in determining the exposure of Aerospace Engineering tasks to Generative AI.
Specifically, this percentage highlights the limitation of AI in supporting Aerospace Engineers to
identify problems, conduct research into new aspects, design models, and develop new
aeronautical products, such as aircraft.

Elaboration:

The low agreement percentage is due to the complexity of Aerospace Engineering tasks,
which entail various advanced technical, regulatory, and environmental considerations. The
implementation of AI cannot fully integrate trained data to assist in completing Aerospace
Engineering tasks. Thus, it serves as an obstacle to task evaluations between humans and
Generative AI in enhancing aircraft manufacturing effectiveness and efficiency.

The aerospace engineering industry is a strategic activity, as it is a sector with significant

impact on the economic context. In detail, the cycle from research, project development,
manufacturing, and commercialization requires professionals to be well-prepared and proficient
in mathematics, physics, and aerodynamics to ensure the standardization of the manufacturing
process. Furthermore, professionals should comprehend and apply their understanding to control
specialized technologies, despite the limited automation of manufacturing standardization. This
is the reason for the low agreement percentage between humans and ChatGPT.

Final rating sheet result:

E0: 44.44%
The majority of tasks are not exposed to GenAI, which means that Aerospace engineering
tasks still depend on human expertise and power, decision-making and manufacturing
management skills.
E1: 38.89%
More than a third of tasks have some exposure to GenAI, it may result in the fact that
Aerospace Engineers need to upskill and adapt to AI driven workflows to optimize efficiency
and productivity in manufacturing operations.
E2: 16.67%
A small percentage of tasks have high exposure to GenAI and Aerospace Engineers are
expected to initiate reskilling and job specialization to achieve competitive advantage and
effective collaboration with AI systems.
 Lower Bound Estimate (LBE): 38.89%
It is estimated that nearly 40% of Aerospace Engineering tasks may be impacted by
GenAI technologies. Hence ensuring Aerospace professionals to create effective collaboration
with AI systems and adapt to new task flow.
Middle Estimate (ME): 47.22%
The percentage of Middle Estimate accounts for half of the tasks with high AI exposure
in addition to E1 tasks. Approximately 47% of tasks may be affected by AI in consideration of
exposure levels. This highlights the importance for workforce development strategies to solve AI
applications in many aspects of Aerospace Engineering.
Upper bound estimate (UBE): 55.56%
Some E1 and E2 tasks got exposed to GenAI, proving an upper limit for AI potential
influence on Aerospace Engineering tasks. It motivates professionals in this field to increase
their adaptability to AI-driven work environments and maintain a competitive edge.

III. Frictions Slowing the Adoption of Gen AI for My Focus Job

- Technical/organizational demands
Technical knowledge gap: Do companies in your field have the in-house expertise to effectively
implement and manage generative AI systems?

● The first point to note is that reliability and robustness are paramount in ensuring the
training and functioning of GenAI in safety-critical aerospace applications. However, AI
algorithms could be susceptible to attacks and errors and malfunctions when processing
trained data related to wind navigation, weather conditions, or airspeed control for
aircraft navigation instruments.

● Aerospace organizations should implement robust testing, validation, and fail-safe

mechanisms to mitigate the aforementioned risks. The complexity of GenAI systems
poses technical challenges in terms of development, integration, and maintenance.
Aerospace engineers are required to adhere to performance requirements and regulatory
standards to effectively manage the complexity of AI technologies.

Integration challenges:
● Aerospace organizations may struggle with acquiring high-quality and relevant data
necessary for training and operating AI algorithms effectively. Moreover, inadequate or
biased data may lead to false predictions and inaccurate decisions in the generative
design process as in the case of AI making a mistake in determining atmospheric
conditions for a missile attack.

● In the safety-critical aerospace applications, which gain regulator and user trust
requires transparency and accuracy in Gen AI decision making processes. Nevertheless,
 AI algorithms may make it challenging to explain the reasoning behind decisions, raising
doubts about accountability and trustworthiness.

● When integrating Generative AI into current Aerospace workflows and systems, it is

imperative to restructure the designing process of aircraft or spacecraft and re-allocation
of human engineers. It may take a long time to adapt to such transformations and not
bring the desired results.

Cost and ROI:

● While companies in aerospace show readiness to invest in generative AI, concerns

about ROI uncertainty exist due to potential data interpretation errors. In spite of this,
support from investors and government fuel adoption is maintained with the data
validation and industry partnership are important to minimize the risks.

Data privacy & security

● Data privacy: Implementation of Generative AI depends on extensive data to produce
precise designing and operating outcomes, which often contain sensitive details like
personal information about instrument index, passengers or flight crew. Thus,
mishandling or misuse of this data could result in privacy violations, posing significant
risks.

● Security concerns: Generative AI applications in Aerospace Engineering raises concerns

about unauthorized access to aeronautical design indexes and have a negative impact on
manufacturing processes. For Passenger Airplanes, the control board could be
jeopardized with unstable or inaccurate trained data then lead to accidental events. In
Military forces, unmanned aircraft may not receive guiding data for controlling and lead
to the malfunction in operation management. In case Generative AI is decided to
implement in the new process, it must be approved by regulatory agencies such as the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in commercial aviation.

Copyright / IP
Intellectual property and copyright:

● When the Aerospace Organization uses copyrighted data for AI training purposes it
cannot be seen as fair use. For some reasons, this ambiguity can create legal risks and
discourage Generative AI developers from using certain data sources, preventing the
potential of Generative AI in the aerospace industry. This problem arises in the case
Aerospace organizations develop an AI system to optimize the design of aircraft
components. Thus, AI models are trained to use a large dataset including designs from
 various aerospace manufacturers without permission, and this is the action of violating IP
right and clearer guidelines and legal framework to solve this challenge.

Bias/hallucidation issues
Biases are built into the generative AI system through the data used to train the models. These
biases may reflect underlying societal biases or imbalances.

● These measures show that the industry knows about the risks of AI. One risk is bias in the
data used to train AI models, which can make recommendations or analyses unfair. Also,
generative AI might see patterns or things in data that are nonexistent. This can lead to
nonsensical or wrong decision-making algorithms in flight control systems or
discriminatory hỉing practices in aerospace organizations.

● Another point is Generative AI systems may show bias if trained on non-representative

data, potentially resulting in unfair outcomes, especially in areas like hiring and resource
allocation in Aerospace companies. It also causes threats to fairness and equity of
aerospace operations and limits the generative design innovation and diversity in the
field. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that training data is diverse and inclusive to
mitigate such biases and promote fairness and equality in AI-driven decision-making
processes in the aerospace field.

Employee or public opposition or lack of trust

Trust and public perception: Negative public perception or lack of trust in AI systems
could influence a company's decision to adopt the technology.

● The implementation of generative AI within the Aerospace industry carries the potential
for job displacement, notably impacting fields like pilot training and aircraft
maintenance. Such transitions could significantly affect individuals and communities,
particularly if viable alternative job opportunities are scarce. It is essential for
stakeholders to proactively address these workforce implications to mitigate adverse
effects and ensure a smooth transition towards AI integration in aviation operations.

Job displacement fears: Concerns about AI replacing human workers could lead to
resistance from employees and unions.

● Workforce problems arise while GenAI can enhance efficiency, it can cause the
disruption with the job displacement and employees retraining and upskilling, for this
reason Aerospace organizations are required to address workforce transition and skill
development to mitigate the impact of Gen AI on employees.
IV. My Focus Job in 2030: Untouched, Augmented or Replaced by Gen AI

Aerospace engineers will be categorized as being augmented by Gen AI to increase efficiency

and productivity. With the help of Gen AI, Aerospace engineers can revolutionize the design
process, enabling the industry to create new designs and optimize existing manufacturing costs
before launching the product to the market.

- Rate your job as LE, HELC or HEHC, based on Parts II & III above.
On the basis of final rating scores for Aerospace Engineer:
● E0 (Low Exposure) = 44.44%
● E1 (High Exposure with Low Complementarity) = 38.89%
● E2 (High Exposure with High Complementarity) = 16.67%
And using the estimates:
● LBE (Lower Bound Estimate) = 38.89%
● ME (Middle Estimate) = 47.22%
● UBE (Upper Bound Estimate) = 55.56%

Concerning the above estimates and exposure levels, the Aerospace Engineer Job can be
considered as High Exposure High Complementarity (HEHC) because the highest exposure
estimate (UBE) is above 50%, presenting that the job has considerable portion of tasks that could
benefit from Generative AI while still having a significant percentage of tasks with high
complementarity. In addition, it also demonstrates that some tasks are exposed to AI with low
complementarity (E1).

- Discuss what this could mean for you in the year 2030 (or whenever you enter into a
career trajectory) (Example: Đề cập những models liên quan mà Generative AI có thể
được áp dụng vào cho đến năm đó)

In order to give a broader description of Gen AI and its impact on Aerospace Engineering
professionals in 2030. O*NET profile will be mentioned below in E2 group since Aerospace
Engineering jobs are categorized as High Exposure High Complementarity (HEHC).

E2 (High Exposure with High Complementarity): Aerospace engineers in this group work on
advanced mathematical modeling, testing, and design analysis to ensure the performance, safety,
and environmental impact of aerospace products. In details, the key responsibilities include:
- Developing mathematical models and computer analysis methods to evaluate and
optimize designs based on customer requirements.
- Conducting experimental and environmental tests on prototypes to assess performance
and identify potential issues.
 Aerospace engineers are required to review designs to minimize negative environmental
impacts and ensure compliance with regulations. Furthermore, AI technologies have significant
potential to enhance these tasks by enabling advanced simulations, data analysis, and predictive
modeling. Engineers in the E2 group can leverage AI to create innovative solutions that optimize
performance, address environmental concerns, and push the boundaries of aerospace technology
with the support of Generative AI in aircraft designs and flight instrument operation control.

In the year 2030, there are effects on the Aerospace Engineering industry in several
aspects. The application of Generative AI into Aerospace Engineering enhances the collaboration
between engineers and Gen AI systems. In 2030, Aerospace engineers will work in collaboration
with Generative AI systems to design, test, and optimize aerospace products. Generative AI is
likely to augment their capabilities in areas such as generative design, data analysis, and
predictive modeling. This collaboration will pave the way for creating more innovative solutions
and ensuring high safety and quality standards.

Regarding manufacturing efficiency and effectiveness, Gen AI will undertake routine

and repetitive tasks, allowing Aerospace engineers to focus on high-level decision-making,
strategic planning, and problem-solving in the final generative designs and the main operating
process for flight instruments. For this reason, Aerospace Engineers should sharpen their
leadership skills, creativity, and critical thinking to harmonize well with Gen AI in
manufacturing and designing aircraft or spacecraft.

The integration of Generative AI in the aerospace industry will help develop

technologies such as autonomous systems, advanced materials, and sustainable propulsion
methods. As Gen AI technologies advance, it will become increasingly important to engage in
continuous learning and professional development to adapt to the latest tools and techniques for
manufacturing aircraft and spacecraft. Aerospace engineers must develop new skills in
programming, data analysis, or AI ethics to effectively collaborate with AI systems and navigate
potential challenges related to weather, wind directions, and engine function and quality.

One example is EXCITE Tip/Tilt bracket was manufactured by human engineers and
Generative AI.

Human Engineers Generative AI

Human engineers initially created the design,
with a design engineer and structural analyst
working together to develop the CAD model and
ensure it met requirements. Iterations were made
to reduce weight and improve stiffness, but some
designs were difficult to manufacture.
In contrast, AI designs were created using the
Evolved Structures process with Fusion 360
software. AI considered interface requirements,
constraints, and loads, aiming to maximize
stiffness while keeping weight low and ensuring
manufacturability.
Thanks to the implementation of Generative AI, the Aerospace Engineering industry can witness
a positive transformation in optimizing Aerospace product manufacturing for Aircraft and
Spacecraft. In the example mentioned above, the EXCITE Tip/Tilt bracket designed by Gen AI
outperformed the human version in all aspects. They are readily manufacturable with
significantly better stiffness-to-mass ratios and lower maximum stress. As a result, AI designs
are completed faster with minimal human effort, showing a significant improvement in time and
cost efficiency. This newly invented model is likely to bring about a transformation in the
Aerospace sector.

V. Broader Implications of AI: My Country in 2030 (Also base on O*NET profile)

- Was your country AE, EM or LIC (based on the IMF report posted to Moodle)

Vietnam is classified as a Low Income Country (LIC) based on an IMF report and
reported to have a rapidly growing aerospace industry that offers significant opportunities for
investment and collaboration. According to Governmental journalism, Vietnam's aviation sector
has seen remarkable growth in recent years, driven by an increasing demand for air travel and the
development of local aeronautical and astronautical manufacturing. This has created a viable
environment for domestic and foreign companies to invest in the development of Vietnam’s
aerospace industry.

In Vietnam, the aerospace industry includes segments such as aircraft manufacturing,

maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO), and airport infrastructure development. Key players
are Vietnam airline, VietJet Air, Bamboo Airways, and Vietnam Air Services Company
(VASCO) and the Research Institution that contributed to the development of these Aerospace
companies is the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology. The compound annual growth
rate (CAGR) is 9.6%, Vietnam aerospace industry is expected to reach 521 by 2030.

● Purpose of the discussion: Exploring AI's implications for Vietnam in 2030

With the aim of exploring the implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Vietnam, as
a Low Income Country (LIC), in the year 2030. When AI plays an important role in shaping
industries, economies, and societies, it is imperative to assess the potential impact of Aerospace
Technological Transformation for country development. Through the determination of AI's
implications for Vietnam in 2030, the concentration of potential impact of AI on Vietnam will be
considered in job displacement, creation, and changing nature of work and required skills. Also it
will mention the challenges and risks associated with AI adoption in Vietnam Aerospace
Engineering jobs and Aerospace industry.
 - What does the IMF say are the implications of AI for countries in this category?

First of all, IMF proposes an AI Preparedness Index (AIPI) covering multiple strategic
areas for AI readiness. The AIPI are set under four categories (Digital infrastructure, Innovation
and Economic Integration, Human Capital and Labor Market Policies, and Regulation and
Ethics)

According to Figure 12 in IMF 2024 on AI jobs, Low Income Countries are less exposed
to AI-driven trends due to the underpreparedness across all dimensions to reap the benefits of AI.
Additionally, Low Income Countries possess fragile digital infrastructure and less digitally
skilled labor force in LIC.
 As presented through Figure 13 for the relationship between the Information and
Communications Technology (ICT) employment share and the components of AI preparedness
Index we can signify Positive Correlation between Information and Communications Technology
(ICT) employee shares and AI Preparedness. This shows that investing in ICT can help promote
digital skills and LIC become more prepared for AI adoption.

In addition, innovation and skills components have the strongest correlation with ICT
employment share. This highlights the importance of fostering innovation, developing digital
skills, and enhancing the education system and digital infrastructure in Low Income Countries to
create a workforce capable of adapting to the AI-driven changes.

Based on the IMF report, it is evident that the influence of AI adoption in Aerospace
Engineering brings benefits to this sector. Firstly, AI can optimize the design process, leading to
more efficient, safe, cost-effective aircraft design. Secondly, AI algorithms can analyze data to
predict component failures, reducing maintenance costs and improving safety. Thirdly, the
adoption of AI can optimize flight routes, fuel consumption, and resource allocation, enhancing
overall efficiency. Fourthly, AI will enable the development of autonomous aircrafts and
uncrewed systems to open new opportunities in the Aerospace Industry.
In contrast, there are still challenges arising from this sector’s complexity and potential
risks for some reasons. AI models require high-quality data for accurate predictions and
developing AI models to apply in Aerospace Engineering requires appropriate regulations and
standards with ethical considerations such as job displacement and privacy issues.

● 3. Recommendations for adapting to AI-driven changes

Additional relevant points from the IMF report specific to Vietnam's context (Additional
research)

With regards to Vietnam’s robust economic recovery, presented by its 8.02% GDP
growth rate in 2022 as reported by the World Bank, Vietnam proved to be the promising
environment for investing in and developing AI applications in the aerospace industry. This
advancement can drive innovation, operational efficiency and safety assurance in the industry.
Furthermore, with the global market’s impact on Vietnam aerospace industry, AI plays an
important role in optimizing supply chains and determining new growth opportunities like
VietJet Air's successful implementation of AI for predictive maintenance and flight scheduling
optimization, reducing operational costs, as highlighted by CAPA Centre for Aviation. More
importantly, Vietnam’s commitment to reforming structures such as the privatization of
state-owned enterprises, paves the way for modernizing regulatory frameworks and improving
transparency in Aerospace Manufacturing and Operations.

In recent years, Vietnam has experienced radical changes in economic growth, translating
from low-income country. This growth has stimulated job creation in many industries, including
Aerospace Engineering. For this reason, there is a likelihood of increased job opportunities for
aerospace engineers. According to the International Air Transport Association (IATA),
Vietnam is reported to be in the Top 4 fastest growing Aerospace industry with the largest
number of passengers in the world. At current, Vietnam Aerospace Organizations are in need
of high-skilled engineers with several job opportunities for fresh graduates. However, Vietnam
suffers from the shortage of skilled labor at about 40 percent of labor demand. After COVID-19,
Aerospace firms set goals and plans to build airports, aircraft manufacturing facilities, and
research centers in Long Thanh, Vietnam.

AI applications in aerospace engineering can help enhance aircraft design, flight

operations, and maintenance. Machine learning techniques can examine massive datasets,
allowing engineers to recognize trends and make data-driven decisions. This can result in more
efficient aircraft designs, less fuel consumption, and lower emissions. AI can also automate basic
operations, freeing engineers to focus on the more challenging and inventive parts of aircraft
development. One notable example is the LOTUSat-1 satellite project, developed by the Vietnam
National Space Center (VNSC) in collaboration with Japan's NEC Corporation. LOTUSat-1 is an
Earth observation satellite equipped with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) technology. The
satellite is designed to capture high-resolution images of the Earth's surface, regardless of
weather conditions, for various applications such as disaster management, resource monitoring,
and environmental protection. AI plays a significant role in the LOTUSat-1 project, enabling
advanced image processing and data analysis techniques to extract valuable insights from the
captured satellite data. The successful development and launch of LOTUSat-1 demonstrate
Vietnam's commitment to harnessing AI technologies in its space programs.

As Vietnam's aerospace industry evolves, incorporating AI will be critical to the country's

worldwide competitiveness. By harnessing AI's benefits and addressing the hurdles connected
with its implementation, Vietnam can create new growth possibilities and high-skilled jobs in the
aerospace engineering sector. To summarize, the implications of AI for Aerospace Engineering
in Vietnam are far-reaching, and tackling these broader concerns will assist the country in
realizing the promise of AI to change its aerospace industry and contribute to the nation's overall
economic development.

References

ONET. (n.d.). Title of Profile [Aerospace Engineers]. ONET OnLine. Retrieved from
https://www.onetonline.org/link/summary/17-2011.00

Soler, M. (Year of Publication). Fundamentals of Aerospace Engineering: An introductory course

to aeronautical engineering. Publisher.

Lary, D. J. (Year of Publication). Artificial Intelligence in Aerospace. Joint Center for Earth
Systems Technology (JCET) UMBC, NASA/GSFC, United States.

Cazzaniga, M., Jaumotte, F., Li, L., Melina, G., Panton, A. J., Pizzinelli, C., Rockall, E., &
Tavares, M. M. (Year of Publication). Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work
(Reference number: SDN/2024/001).

Gozalo-Brizuela, R., & Garrido-Merchán, E. C. (Year of Publication). A survey of Generative AI

Applications. Quantitative Methods Department, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid,
Spain. Email: 201905616@alu.comillas.edu, ecgarrido@icade.comillas.edu
McClelland, R. (Year of Publication). Generative Design and Digital Manufacturing: Using AI
and robots to build lightweight instruments. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD
20770.

Li, W. (Year of Publication). The application of artificial intelligence in aerospace engineering.

Joint Institution, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. Email:
andyli0912@sjtu.edu.cn.

Baochinhphu.vn. (2024, January 21). Việt Nam sẽ phóng vệ tinh radar đầu tiên vào đầu năm
2025. Retrieved from
https://baochinhphu.vn/viet-nam-se-phong-ve-tinh-radar-dau-tien-vao-dau-nam-2025-102240121
103647115.htm

World Bank. (2022). GDP growth (annual %) - Vietnam. Retrieved from

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=VN

Aerospace Manufacturing and Design. (2023, September). The good, the bad, and the awful of
AI in aerospace. Retrieved from
https://www.aerospacemanufacturinganddesign.com/article/the-good-the-bad-and-the-awful-of-a
i-in-aerospace/

The AI Newsletter. (2023, November 1). Generative AI in aerospace design. Retrieved from
https://theainewsletter.in/2023/11/01/generative-ai-in-aerospace-design-5/

Centre for Aviation. (2024). Vietnam country profile. Retrieved from

https://centreforaviation.com/data/profiles/countries/vietnam