Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STUDENTS IN
LUBAO: IDENTITY
AND BEYOND
Arcie C. Cabrera - MALED
INTRODUCT
it makes the
language ION
indolent
The unending convenience and
(Bhamare,
2020) upgrading of Facebook have led to
the explosion of many new words
and changes the ways how ideas
It shortens English are structured and communicated.
the messages effects of social proficiency
improves, and Thus, this study was formulated
with poor media to the new terms are concerned with conducting
grammar… communication learned discourse analysis in the syntactic
(Hanke, 2018) (Faryadi, 2017)
level of the Facebook status posts
of the students. The syntactic
analysis was applied through word
native and non- … encounters
and sentence-level to the status
native English
ethical posts with identified unique terms,
speakers reveals
issues… and identification of the other
two beneficial
implications (Cervera, 2012) observable features of the entire
(Fahad, 2016) corpus beyond the scope of the
two levels.
Generally, this study aims to conduct a discourse The researcher believes that this study will
analysis on the status posts of the students on
Facebook at the syntactic level.
be beneficial to the students, parents,
teachers/language teachers, school
Specifically, this study sought answers to the
following questions: principals/administrators, and future
researchers.
1. What are the identified unique terms common
on the Facebook posts of the respondents?
2. How do the analyses of the Facebook posts with SIGNIFICANCE OF
the identified unique terms describe the online THE STUDY
language identity of respondents in terms of
2.1. Word Level; and Since the nature of this study was primarily
2.2. Sentence Level? qualitative, assumptions were made on the
case of the respondents’ posts on Facebook
3. What other observable features do the
which shared common and/or distinct language
respondents’ Facebook language have?
structures. It can be considered that
4. What do the findings reveal about the language respondents composed their posts in such
identity of the students online?
structure intentionally for that is the language
existing in that online world.
• Qualitative research deals with the • McCombes (2019) asserted that descriptive
investigation of meanings, interpretations, research aims to precisely and methodically
symbols, relations, and the processes of describe a phenomenon or a population.
social life (Crossman, 2020).
• It also aims to understand the social reality of • Bhasin (2019) explained that descriptive research
individuals, groups, and cultures as nearly as provides an answer to what and not to how or why
questions. It is concerned with the trends of a
possible as its participants feel or live it by
particular field and a good option when the researcher
studying them in their natural setting (McLeod,
does not have any information about the problem.
2019).
PROCEDURE Two days after the communication with the advisers, the Google Form was
set to stop accepting responses for the final list of the participants.
Then, the Facebook posts for the February month of every participant
were collected and compiled with the participants’ names replaced by
codes.
DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
The analysis followed the steps suggested by Luo (2019) which includes
selecting content, defining units and categories, developing coding rules, coding of
texts, and analyzing results.
1) The proponent selected the Facebook posts as the subject for this discourse
analysis.
2) Then, only those posts from the target participants shared within February 2021
were included as data.
3) Codes were pre-determined and assigned before the actual coding stage. For
word-level, the derivations, classifications, definitions, and inflections were
analyzed while the sentence level included patterns, structures, functions, and
constructions. Any recurring theme beyond was considered in the analysis of
other features.
4) Lastly, the results will be analyzed and discussed from which the significant
findings, conclusions, and recommendations were drawn.
FINDINGS OF THE
STUDY
Table 2
The Identified Unique Terms of the Respondents