Filtration efficiency of hospital face mask alternatives available for use
during the COVID-19 pandemic
Throughout the height of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic
cases, there had been a huge concern about the allocation of protection resources for healthcare professionals. This has caused them to experience insufficiencies in health care materials and the practice of nonstandard, decontaminant alternative procedures to preserve face masks lifespan. Consequently, this study aims to examine the fitted filtration efficiencies (FFEs) of these alternative respirators and face masks used during the pandemic. The study used the Health Administration’s Quantitative Fit Testing Protocol through adult male and female volunteers. Participants were then modeled to use new, expired, and sterilized face masks through a series of repeated movements that stimulates the working environment of face masks users. In line with this, the utilization of particle generators and face masks fitted with probes were used to continuously monitor the particles outside. Accordingly, this study revealed that out of the face masks alternatives, use of worn-out N95 masks with secure elastic bands and ethylene oxide-sterilized masks remained a FFE performance of over 95%, however, using incorrect size of this mask resulted in a marginally lower range—between 90% to 95% FFE. Surgical and procedure masks exhibited low FFEs, with elastic ear loop-secured masks inhibiting the worst result—38.1% FFE. This study suggests that when N95 respirators are not available, alternative options are acceptable but may also not be as effective. Thus, ensuring importance on the face mask’s fit to one’s face, and emphasizing the quality of the material can guarantee greater protection.
From Educational Semblance To Medical Hodgepodge Unraveling The Vectors of Virtual Education and Simulation-Based Technology To Filipino Medical Students
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology