Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AND
MUNIR, M
m.y.munir1@salford.ac.uk:
1. Introduction
1.1. HOUSING RETROFIT
this, Lazzeretti et al. (2022) propose that artificial intelligence is still an emerging
topic. Most literature on AI was published after the year 2020. Accordingly,
artificial intelligence can be considered to be in an earlier stage of its application.
In the future, more significant developments are to be expected. Although the
possibilities of artificial intelligence are still uncertain, there can be a
considerable influence from AI on the way of doing retrofit. Accordingly, this
study looks at how artificial intelligence will influence the retrofit processes and
address retrofit challenges.
The concept of artificial intelligence first came into conversation when Alan
Turing answered the problem of “Can machines think?” in 1950. He used an
example test called “Turing Test”. This debated the field for some time. However,
the term “Artificial Intelligence” came into the vocabulary in 1956 at an
Academic conference on AI. After different levels of progress in the AI field,
2023 showed a considerable boom in the AI field with AI language models such
as ChatGPT (IBM, 2023). According to Bill Gates, there are two breakthrough
phenomena that he has witnessed in his lifetime. One is the graphical user
interface (GUI) in 1980 and the other is the Artificial Intelligence in 2022. An AI
program was able to score 59 out of 60 MCQ in the advanced biology
examination in the USA while scoring A Plus for the essay part. Accordingly, the
world is witnessing a dramatic change in the way computers are operated (Gates,
2023).
1.3. OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study is to identify the potential change of housing retrofit
due to artificial intelligence with the different stakeholders involved.
2. Methods
3. Findings
3.1. CAPABILITIES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Computer vision is the acquiring and processing of images for visual simulation.
Accordingly, computers can sense the visual environment (Tan et al., 2022).
Khan et al. (2022) have proposed the use of computer vision for safety
management in construction. By placing CCTV cameras in the workplace, an AI
model is used to identify and alert unsafe behaviour of the workers. The accuracy
was 98%. In another case, Tan et al. (2022) have studied the use of computer
vision AI in intelligent buildings for controlling lights. The accuracy was 95.15%.
Lu et al. (2022) used computer vision to identify and segregate construction
waste. The AI model is useful for managing construction waste in real-life and
complex scenarios. Using computer vision for progress monitoring in
construction sites was discussed by Reja et al. (2022). Another study has looked
at using computer vision AI to identify cracks in civil infrastructure. Computers
can analyse images or videos more effectively than humans (Ai et al., 2023).
In machine learning, the computer makes decisions using a large amount of data.
However, how the decision is made is not visible (Siebert et al., 2021). Khambra
& Shukla (2021) talk about using machine learning in fly ash concrete. As the
use of fly ash for concrete is more sustainable, AI can help to predict the
performance after construction. Another study has evaluated using AI for
managing quality in industrial processes. Quality measurement is one of the main
aspects in industrial cases. Further, when it comes to prefabrication, most items
are manufactured off-site. Siebert et al. (2021) used machine learning for quality
management in concrete manufacturing. Alshboul et al. (2022) use machine
learning to predict cost of the green buildings. With machine learning, the
accuracy of the cost estimate can be improved. Koc et al. (2022) suggest that the
use of machine learning can be helpful in predicting and mitigating workplace
accidents. Further, Gondia et al. (2020) have used machine learning algorithms to
predict and estimate project delays. Construction project delays are highly critical
in managing the project to the objectives.
Robotic automation can be simply defined as the physical motion of things for
performing various tasks (Xiao et al., 2022). A study suggested that the use of
robotic automation in construction together with BIM is 39 times faster than
usual (Wong Chong et al., 2022). Xiao et al. (2022) further suggest that
prefabrication, collaboration, and automation have potential with robotic
processes. Onososen & Musonda (2022) predict a higher level of potential for
robotics in construction, especially in improving productivity and safety. Further,
Feldmann (2022) shows the potential of robotic automation in improving
modular construction and prefabrication. Another research team has published
their work on cable-driven robots for masonry construction of walls (Bruckmann
& Boumann, 2021). Aghimien et al. (2022) suggest that the implementation of
robotic automation is obvious in the future. One benefit of this is the enhanced
safety levels due to the automation of manual human work.
3.1.5. Optimisation
TABLE 5: Summary of Optimisation
AI category Example capabilities
Optimisation 1. Process optimisation
2. Product optimisation
3. Tools optimisation
4. Solution optimisation
well as solve the current optimisation issues. Berk Ekici et al. (2022) have
studied the potential of artificial intelligence in optimising self-sufficiency in
high-rise buildings. The brief insight of the study is that artificial intelligence is
highly useful in the optimisation of different aspects of construction (Abioye et
al., 2021). It is hard to list them all as the list is exhaustive. Generally, processes,
products, tools, and solutions can be given as examples.
4. Discussion
4.1. CUSTOMERS
With the retrofit process, there are two possible influenced parties. One is the
homeowner who owns the house. The other is the tenant, ideally living in the
house under a rent agreement. One of the important aspects of housing retrofit for
the customer is energy efficiency. According to Tan et al. (2022) computer vision
can be useful in making intelligent buildings with higher energy efficiency. In
addition, NLP can be helpful in resolving disputes between the customer and the
contractor (Hassan et al., 2021). Further, NLP can be used to collect occupant
data and understand their behaviour (Panchalingam & Chan, 2019). In general,
the use of AI will be able to help the retrofit experience better with improved
transparency, more personalised and more intuitive.
4.2. ACTORS
Actors are the stakeholders who bring the change. Accordingly, retrofit
professionals are the people who should introduce the use of AI in retrofit
deliverables. It can be noted that most of the AI capabilities are directly
influencing the way of working of retrofit professionals. Mainly, project
managers’ and designers’ stakes are discussed.
From the perspective of the project managers, improved health and safety
(Aghimien et al., 2022; Koc et al., 2022; Khan et al., 2022), progress evaluation
(Reja et al., 2022)., dispute resolution (Hassan et al., 2021), quality management
(Siebert et al., 2021), cost estimation (Alshboul et al., 2022), time estimation/
delay prediction (Gondia et al., 2020) and automated construction with robotics
(Bruckmann & Boumann, 2021) can be noted.
From the designers’ perspective, designing more intelligent buildings (Tan et
al., 2022), reviewing project specifications (Moon et al., 2022), automating the
compliance check (Zhang & El-Gohary, 2016), performance predicting
composite materials (Khambra & Shukla, 2021) and optimising the solutions can
be noted.
This involves the rules, interactions, procedures, and all the activities within the
change. In the context of the AI influence on housing retrofit, this includes
changing the retrofit process from a state without AI to one with AI. However,
the important aspect is to what level AI can be adopted. For this purpose, a
maturity analysis model of AI in a retrofit context will be ideal. It will be out of
the scope of this study. This study is expected to signpost the directions of
changes involved with AI adoption in the retrofit industry.
4.4. WORLDVIEW
The general worldview about the use of artificial intelligence can be suggested as
positive in terms of the above selective literature. However, this can be argued as
biased as the literature is selected, not systematic. Further, the worldview could
be ideally obtained through empirical data collection through interviews or
questionnaire surveys.
4.5. OWNER
optimisation comes into play. It is expected that AI technologies can optimise the
existing processes, tools, products, and solutions which will contribute to higher
project value.
5. Conclusion
This study focused on how artificial intelligence will change the retrofit process
in the big picture. For this purpose, a selective literature review was conducted
under five key themes of artificial intelligence. These five themes can be noted as
computer vision, machine learning, natural language processing, robotic process
automation and optimisation. However, the literature review was conducted in
the general construction industry as the housing retrofit industry lacked relevant
literature. As the next step, a CATWOE analysis was done to suggest the
potential change from artificial intelligence adoption to housing retrofit. Finally,
a discussion was carried out to suggest the potential change of artificial
intelligence to housing retrofit processes.
It can be concluded that the main influence of artificial intelligence on the
housing retrofit will be improving the action of the retrofit professionals. Retrofit
project managers' and retrofit designers' work scopes are mainly identified. The
designing process and project management functions are the clear beneficiaries
of artificial intelligence. Further, the government and the construction companies
as the owners will also have a considerable influence. Mainly, the processes
applicable to housing retrofit will be optimised with artificial intelligence. The
government will be able to drive housing retrofit more rigorously. Construction
companies will be able to reduce their direct costs and overheads through AI
optimisation. However, there will be challenges in adopting artificial intelligence,
which was not covered under the scope of this study. Further, the maturity of
artificial intelligence in the retrofit industry is also not studied.
This study has been done as an eye-opener to draw attention towards adopting
artificial intelligence for improving housing retrofit processes. It is recommended
that further studies be conducted to establish the true potential of AI in the
context of housing retrofit. Further, it will be highly beneficial to evaluate AI
maturity models in the retrofit industry for better positioning of this disruptive
technology in a progressive trajectory.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the contributors to the literature referred to in this study.
References
ABIOYE, S. O., OYEDELE, L. O., AKANBI, L., AJAYI, A., DAVILA DELGADO, J. M., BILAL,
M., AKINADE, O. O., & AHMED, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the construction
industry: A review of present status, opportunities and future challenges. Journal of Building
Engineering, 44(1), 103299. Sciencedirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103299
AGHIMIEN, D., IKUABE, M., AGHIMIEN, L. M., AIGBAVBOA, C., NGCOBO, N., &
YANKAH, J. (2022). PLS-SEM assessment of the impediments of robotics and automation
deployment for effective construction health and safety. Journal of Facilities Management.
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-04-2022-0037
AKINSOLA, J. E. T., ADEAGBO, M. A., OLADAPO, K. A., AKINSEHINDE, S. A., &
ONIPEDE, F. O. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Emergence in Disruptive Technology. In A. O.
Salau, S. Jain, & M. Sood (Eds.), Computational Intelligence and Data Sciences. CRC Press.
ALSHBOUL, O., SHEHADEH, A., ALMASABHA, G., & ALMUFLIH, A. S. (2022). Extreme
Gradient Boosting-Based Machine Learning Approach for Green Building Cost Prediction.
Sustainability, 14(11), 6651. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116651
BASDEN, A., & WOOD-HARPER, A. T. (2006). A philosophical discussion of the root definition
in soft systems thinking: an enrichment of CATWOE. Systems Research and Behavioral
Science, 23(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.689
BERK EKICI, OKAN F. S. F. TURKCAN, TURRIN, M., I. SEVIL SARIYILDIZ, & M. FATIH
TASGETIREN. (2022). Optimising High-Rise Buildings for Self-Sufficiency in Energy
Consumption and Food Production Using Artificial Intelligence: Case of Europoint Complex in
Rotterdam. Energies, 15(2), 660–660. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020660
BRUCKMANN, T., & BOUMANN, R. (2021). Simulation and optimization of automated masonry
construction using cable robots. 50, 101388–101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101388
BSI. (2019). PAS 2035:2019 Retrofitting dwellings for improved energy efficiency – Specification
and guidance. The British Standards Institution.
CAO, X.-Y., SHEN, D., FENG, D.-C., WANG, C.-L., QU, Z., & WU, G. (2022). Seismic
retrofitting of existing frame buildings through externally attached sub-structures: State of the
art review and future perspectives. Journal of Building Engineering, 57, 104904.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104904
DAUDA, J. A., & AJAYI, S. O. (2022). Understanding the impediments to sustainable structural
retrofit of existing buildings in the UK. Journal of Building Engineering, 60, 105168.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105168
DBEIS. (2021). Heat and buildings strategy. GOV.UK.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/heat-and-buildings-strategy
DING, Y., MA, J., & LUO, X. (2022). Applications of natural language processing in construction.
Automation in Construction, 136, 104169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104169