Supaul Final DPR

Detailed Project Report
on
___________________________________________________________________________
Preparation of I&D and STP Scheme for Nine Towns under
the Tributaries of River Ganga
Town: Supaul
___________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored by
Bihar Urban Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd,

Govt. of Bihar
Submitted by
CSIR- National Environmental Engineering Research Institute

Nagpur, Maharashtra
December 2020
DPR for Interception and Diversion Works
followed by STP for Supaul Town
Contents
1 ABOUT PROJECT .....................................................................................................................................9
1.1 PREAMBLE ............................................................................................................................................. 9
1.2 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................ 9
2 PROJECT AREA ...................................................................................................................................... 10
2.1 STATE AND DISTRICT .............................................................................................................................. 10

2.2 TOPOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................................... 13
2.3 CLIMATE AND RAINFALL .......................................................................................................................... 13
2.4 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY ...................................................................................................................... 13
2.5 TOURISM AND CULTURAL IMPORTANCE ...................................................................................................... 14
2.6 FOREST AND WILDLIFE ............................................................................................................................ 14
2.7 SOIL AND AGRICULTURE .......................................................................................................................... 14
2.8 LAND USE AND LAND COVER .................................................................................................................... 15
3 DEMOGRAPHICS ................................................................................................................................... 17
4 POLLUTION OF RIVER BY SUPAUL TOWN .............................................................................................. 19
5 RIVER GANGA ....................................................................................................................................... 20
6 WATER SUPPLY IN TOWN ..................................................................................................................... 36
7 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................... 36

8 SOIL CONDITION ................................................................................................................................... 36
9 SANITATION AND SEWERAGE ............................................................................................................... 38
10 NEED FOR I&D WORKS.......................................................................................................................... 38
11 DESIGN CRITERIA .................................................................................................................................. 39
11.1 CATEGORIZATION OF TOWNS ON THE BASIS OF I&D AND TREATMENT INFRASTRUCTURE..................................... 39

11.2 DESIGN OF SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS ................................................................................................... 40
11.3 DESIGN PERIODS .............................................................................................................................. 40
11.4 REQUIRED RATE OF WATER SUPPLY, AS PER CPHEEO MANUAL .................................................................... 41
11.5 INTERCEPTION FACTOR ....................................................................................................................... 42
11.6 DESIGN FLOWS ................................................................................................................................ 43
11.7 GROUND WATER INFILTRATION ............................................................................................................ 43
11.8 SEWER SIZE ..................................................................................................................................... 44
11.9 VELOCITY ........................................................................................................................................ 44
11.10 DEPTH OF FLOW ............................................................................................................................... 45
11.11 MAXIMUM INVERT DEPTH .................................................................................................................. 45
11.12 BEDDING FOR PIPES ........................................................................................................................... 45
2
CSIR-NEERI
11.13 EARTH CUSHION ............................................................................................................................... 46
11.14 SELECTION OF PIPE ............................................................................................................................ 46
11.15 FUTURE POPULATION ........................................................................................................................ 46
11.16 INTERCEPTION & DIVERSION WORKS ..................................................................................................... 47
11.17 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT................................................................................................................ 47
11.18 SEQUENTIAL BATCH REACTOR .............................................................................................................. 48
11.18.1 Level of Automation ............................................................................................................ 49
11.18.2 Advantages of SBR .............................................................................................................. 50
11.19 PHYTORID TECHNOLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 50
12 TREATED EFFLUENT QUALITY ................................................................................................................ 52

13 SELECTION OF TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 53
14 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.......................................................................................................... 54
14.1 O&M FOR INTERCEPTION AND DIVERSION SEWERS ................................................................................... 54

14.2 O&M FOR SBR BASED STP ................................................................................................................ 55
14.3 O&M FOR PHYTORID BASED STP ......................................................................................................... 56
15 POPULATION GROWTH PROJECTIONS .................................................................................................. 57
15.1 ARITHMETIC INCREASE METHOD (AS PER CPHEEO MANUAL) ..................................................................... 57

15.2 INCREMENTAL INCREASE METHOD (AS PER CPHEEO MANUAL) ................................................................... 57
15.3 GEOMETRIC INCREASE METHOD (AS PER CPHEEO MANUAL): ..................................................................... 58
15.4 POPULATION FORECAST CALCULATIONS .................................................................................................. 58
16 DESIGN YEARS ...................................................................................................................................... 71

17 IDENTIFICATION OF DRAINS ................................................................................................................. 72
18 DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS AT DRAINS OUTFALL .............................................................................. 74
19 DRY WEATHER FLOW WATER QUALITY ................................................................................................. 77
20 DRY WEATHER PROJECTIONS FOR FUTURE ........................................................................................... 78
21 PROPOSALS .......................................................................................................................................... 79
21.1 NALLAH INTERCEPTION & DIVERSION WORKS .......................................................................................... 79

21.1.1 Interception & Diversion Point - 1 (Near Chitragupt Temple) ................................................ 84
21.1.2 Interception & Diversion Point - 2 (Near station road) .......................................................... 85
21.1.3 Interception & Diversion Point - 3 (Opposite to Pipra Khurd Road)........................................ 86
21.1.4 Interception & Diversion Point - 4 (Near Navodaya Vidyalaya) ............................................. 87
21.2 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS .............................................................................................................. 89
22 LAND REQUIREMENT ............................................................................................................................ 91

23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.......................................................................................................... 91
3
CSIR-NEERI
24 COST ..................................................................................................................................................... 91
25 ESTIMATION AND COSTING .................................................................................................................. 92
25.1 COST ABSTRACT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 92

25.2 DESIGN AND MEASUREMENT FOR INTERCEPTION AND DIVERSION SEWERS ...................................................... 94
25.2.1 I&D-1 (Design & Measurement) ........................................................................................... 94
25.2.2 I&D-2 (Design & Measurement) ......................................................................................... 100
25.3 BILL OF QUANTITIES FOR INTERCEPTION AND DIVERSION SEWERS ............................................................... 136
25.3.1 I&D-1 (BOQ) ...................................................................................................................... 136
25.3.2 I&D-2 (BOQ) ...................................................................................................................... 141
25.3.3 I&D-3 (BOQ) ...................................................................................................................... 148
25.3.4 I&D-4 (BOQ) ...................................................................................................................... 163
25.4 DESIGN, MEASUREMENT AND BILL OF QUANTITIES FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT ....................................... 170
25.4.1 STP 1 – SBR (8.9 MLD) ....................................................................................................... 170
25.4.2 STP 2 - Phytorid (1.9 MLD) ................................................................................................. 182
25.4.3 STP 3 – Phytorid (1.1 MLD) ................................................................................................ 196
25.5 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST FOR 15 YEARS .............................................................................. 209
25.5.1 STP 1 – SBR (8.9 MLD) ....................................................................................................... 209
25.5.2 STP 2 – Phytorid (1.9 MLD) ................................................................................................ 210
25.5.3 STP 3 – Phytorid (1.1 MLD) ................................................................................................ 211
26 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN............................................................................................. 212
26.1 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS- SUPAUL .................................................................................. 212

26.1.1 Land Use/ Land Cover........................................................................................................ 212
26.1.2 Transportation .................................................................................................................. 212
26.1.3 Raw Water Source............................................................................................................. 212
26.1.4 Sewerage System .............................................................................................................. 213
26.1.5 Air Quality......................................................................................................................... 213
26.1.6 Noise Levels ...................................................................................................................... 213
26.2 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................................................................................. 213
26.2.1 Construction Phase............................................................................................................ 213
26.2.2 Operation Phase................................................................................................................ 214
26.3 MITIGATION MEASURES ................................................................................................................... 214
26.3.1 Environmental Monitoring Plan ......................................................................................... 217
27 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................... 220
4
CSIR-NEERI
List of Tables
TABLE 1 LAND USE PATTERN ................................................................................................................................. 16
TABLE 2 DISTRICT AND CITY DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE (SOURCE: CENSUS OF INDIA, 2011) ..................................................... 17
TABLE 3 HISTORICAL POPULATION OF SUPAUL TOWN .................................................................................................. 18
TABLE 4 WARD WISE POPULATION OF SUPAUL TOWN AS PER 2011 CENSUS DATA .............................................................. 18
TABLE 5 LOCATION AND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS RESULTS OF RIVER GAJNA.................................................................... 20
TABLE 6 SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED AND PRIORITY DRAINS DISCHARGED INTO RIVER GANGA (1) .............................................. 23
TABLE 10 WATER QUALITY REPORT OF RIVER GANGA .................................................................................................. 28
TABLE 11 COMPARISON SUMMARY OF FLOW AND BOD LOAD IN DRAINS IN PRE & POST MONSOON SEASONS .......................... 31
TABLE 12 COMPARISON OF FLOW AND BOD LOAD IN DRAINS IN PRE & POST MONSOON SEASONS ........................................ 31
TABLE 13 WATER QUALITY OF LAKES AND PONDS IN BIHAR, 2016 ................................................................................. 34
TABLE 14 GROUND WATER QUALITY DATA IN BIHAR, 2016 ......................................................................................... 35
TABLE 15 TYPE OF SOIL AT SUPAUL ......................................................................................................................... 37
TABLE 16 DESIGN PERIODS OF INTERCEPTION AND DIVERSION ........................................................................................ 41
TABLE 17 RECOMMENDED PER CAPITA WATER SUPPLY LEVELS FOR DESIGNING SCHEMES .................................................... 42
TABLE 18 PEAK FACTOR FOR CONTRIBUTORY POPULATION............................................................................................ 43
TABLE 19 GROUND WATER INFILTRATION ................................................................................................................. 44
TABLE 20 DIFFERENT BEDDINGS FOR PIPES IN TRENCHES .............................................................................................. 45
TABLE 21 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE STANDARDS (MOEF & CC AMENDMENT, 2017) ............................................................. 53
TABLE 22 STP DISCHARGE NORMS AS PER NGT ORDER (2019) ...................................................................................... 53
TABLE 23 TYPICAL TREATED WATER QUALITY BASED ON TECHNOLOGIES .......................................................................... 54
TABLE 24 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE FOR PHYTORID BASED STP ......................................................................... 56
TABLE 25 HISTORICAL POPULATION DATA OF SUPAUL WITH GROWTH RATE ...................................................................... 59
TABLE 26 ARITHMETIC INCREASE METHOD CALCULATION OF PAST DECADES FOR FUTURE POPULATION FORECASTING ................... 59
TABLE 27 INCREMENTAL INCREASE METHOD CALCULATION OF PAST DECADES FOR FUTURE POPULATION FORECASTING ................. 60
TABLE 28 GEOMETRIC INCREASE METHOD CALCULATION OF PAST DECADES FOR FUTURE POPULATION FORECASTING ................... 60
TABLE 29 WARD WISE PROJECTED POPULATION, WATER DEMAND AND SEWAGE QUANTITY OF ZONE- I ................................. 63
TABLE 30 WARD WISE PROJECTED POPULATION, WATER DEMAND AND SEWAGE QUANTITY OF ZONE- II ................................ 65
TABLE 31 WARD WISE PROJECTED POPULATION, WATER DEMAND AND SEWAGE QUANTITY OF ZONE- III ............................... 66
TABLE 32 WARD WISE PROJECTED POPULATION, WATER DEMAND AND SEWAGE QUANTITY OF ZONE- IV ............................... 67
TABLE 33 POPULATION FORECASTING OF SUPAUL TOWN BY ALL METHODS ........................................................................ 68
TABLE 34 DESIGN YEARS WITH PROJECTED POPULATION AND SEWAGE GENERATION QUANTITY ............................................... 71
TABLE 35 SUPAUL- ZONES AND DRAINS .................................................................................................................... 72
5
CSIR-NEERI
TABLE 36 WASTE WATER SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT .................................................................................................. 77
TABLE 37 PROJECTED AVERAGE DRY WEATHER FLOW IN DRAINS ................................................................................... 78
TABLE 38 SUMMARY DETAILS OF SUPAUL TOWN FOR IMPLEMENTATION I&D SCHEME ........................................................ 79
TABLE 39 DETAILS OF PROPOSED I NTERCEPTION & DIVERSION WORKS ............................................................................ 82
TABLE 40 DETAILS OF PROPOSED STPS .................................................................................................................... 90
TABLE 41 MITIGATION MEASURES FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE .................................................................................... 214
TABLE 42 MITIGATION MEASURES FOR OPERATION PHASE ......................................................................................... 217
TABLE 43 EMP FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION PHASE ...................................................................................... 217
6
CSIR-NEERI
List of Figures
FIGURE 1 AERIAL VIEW OF SUPAUL .......................................................................................................................... 11
FIGURE 2 LOCATION OF SUPAUL DISTRICT ................................................................................................................. 12
FIGURE 3 LU/LC CLASSIFICATION OF SUPAUL TOWN .................................................................................................... 16
FIGURE 4 BAR CHART REPRESENTATION OF POPULATION GROWTH IN SUPAUL .................................................................... 18
FIGURE 5 GANGA RIVER MAP IN BIHAR .................................................................................................................... 22
FIGURE 6 IMAGE SHOWING SOIL INVESTIGATION USING BORE HOLE MECHANISM NEAR GOVT. ENGINEERING COLLEGE, SUPAUL .... 36
FIGURE 7 DISCUSSIONS OF NEERI TEAM WITH ULB PRIOR TO SOIL CONDITIONS INVESTIGATION ............................................ 37
FIGURE 8 FLOW DIAGRAM- SBR............................................................................................................................. 48
FIGURE 9 COMPONENTS OF PHYTORID BASED STP ...................................................................................................... 51
FIGURE 10 CONTAMINANT REMOVAL PROCESS IN PHYTORID BED ................................................................................... 51
FIGURE 11 BAR CHART DIAGRAMS OF PROJECTED POPULATIONS .................................................................................... 61
FIGURE 12 GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS OF PROJECTED POPULATIONS .......................................................................... 62
FIGURE 13 COMPARISON OF POPULATION PROJECTION BY DIFFERENT METHODS................................................................. 69
FIGURE 14 ZONE WISE POPULATION FORECASTING ..................................................................................................... 70
FIGURE 15 DRAIN MAP OF SUPAUL ......................................................................................................................... 73
FIGURE 16 AERIAL VIEW OF SEWAGE PONDS FORMED DUE TO OVERFLOW OF DRAIN-1 NEAR CHITRAGUPT TEMPLE ..................... 74
FIGURE 17 AERIAL VIEW OF SEWAGE PONDS FORMED DUE TO OVERFLOW OF DRAIN-2 NEAR STATION ROAD ............................. 75
FIGURE 18 AERIAL VIEW OF SEWAGE PONDS FORMED DUE TO OVERFLOW OF DRAIN-3 NEAR PIPRA KHURD ROAD ....................... 75
FIGURE 19 IMAGE OF OVERFLOW SEWAGE ENTERED INTO LOW LYING AREA- 1 ................................................................... 76
FIGURE 20 IMAGE OF OVERFLOW SEWAGE ENTERED INTO LOW LYING AREA- 2 ................................................................... 76
FIGURE 21 SUPAUL CITY MAP WITH PROPOSED I& D SCHEMES ...................................................................................... 83
FIGURE 22 AERIAL VIEW OF PROPOSED I&D-1 AND STP-1 NEAR CHITRAGUPT TEMPLE ........................................................ 84
FIGURE 23 PROPOSED SITE LOCATION FOR STP NEAR STATION ROAD .............................................................................. 85
FIGURE 24 AERIAL VIEW OF PROPOSED I&D-2 NEAR STATION ROAD AND PROPOSED STP 1 .................................................. 86
FIGURE 25 AERIAL VIEW OF PROPOSED I&D- 3A, 3B & 3C AND PROPOSED STP- 2 ............................................................ 87
FIGURE 26 AERIAL VIEW OF PROPOSED I&D-4 AND PROPOSED STP- 3 ............................................................................ 88
FIGURE 27 PROPOSED SITE LOCATION FOR STP NEAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA .................................................................... 88
7
CSIR-NEERI
Annexes
Annexure 1- Aerial View of Supaul District and City Boundary
Annexure 2- Ganga River Map of Bihar State
Annexure 3- Supaul City Map with Road network and Water bodies
Annexure 4- Contour Map of Supaul
Annexure 5- Supaul Drain Map
Annexure 6- City Map showing proposed I&D and STP Schemes
Annexure 7- Pre- Site Visit Data Collection List acknowledged by EO, Supaul
Annexure 8- Site Visit Report by IIT- R
Annexure 9- MOEF & CC STP Discharge Norms
Annexure 10- NGT Order for STP Discharge Norms
Annexure 11 A to 11 B- Compliance Report
Annexure 12 A to 12 F- Interceptor Drawings
Annexure 13 A to 13 F- Diversion Sewer Drawings
Annexure 14 A to 14 C - Treated Water Discharge Line Drawings
Annexure 15 A to 15 C – Sewage Treatment Plant Drawing
8
CSIR-NEERI
1 About Project
1.1 Preamble
The Bihar Urban Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd (BUIDCO), Government of

Bihar has entrusted the CSIR-NEERI to prepare a "Detailed Project Report for interception,
diversion of drains followed by STP for nine towns under the tributaries of River Ganga." In
regards to this, an agreement was signed between both the parties, the CSIR-NEERI, Nagpur
and BUIDCO, Patna on 18th of Sep 2018 at BUIDCO headquarters in Patna.
This report deals with Interception and Diversion works followed by Sewage Treatment
Plant for Supaul Town of Bihar. The pre-versions of this DPR were submitted to the BUIDCO,
Patna and SPMG, Patna, on 04th Jan, 2019 and on 23rd March 2019, for which a third party
assessment was carried out by IIT- Roorkee. Based on the comments received from IIT
Roorkee dated 27th March, 2019 and subsequently a meeting with BUIDCO, SPMG and IIT -R
on 29th May, 2019 at BUIDCO headquarters, the compliances are incorporated and the DPR
is resubmitted for further course of action.
1.2 Background
The National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG) was set up by the formerly named Ministry of
Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation (Presently renamed as
Ministry of Jal Shakti by merging with Ministry of Drinking of Drinking Water and Sanitation),
Govt of India to abate the pollutions, to conserve and to rejuvenate the river Ganga.
As one among various activities to achieve the Namami Ganga Flagship programme, the
Bihar Urban Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd, Govt of Bihar under NMCG has
come up with an initiative to treat the sewage generated by the towns that are discharged
into the tributaries of River Ganga. River Ganga that is also known as Ganges is a trans-
boundary river of Asia flowing through India and Bangladesh and the world's third largest
river by discharge. However, in the recent years, intense daily human activities and
industrial development in the regions along the river's basin, has resulted in high pollution
of the river. This pollution has not only threatened humans, but also lot of river species and
its ecosystem, including the Ganges river dolphins, which are a native species of the river.
9
CSIR-NEERI
Hence the NMCG has taken rigorous action to implement various schemes that allow no
untreated sewage to be discharge into the River Ganga and its tributaries.
2 Project Area
Supaul is a municipality town and is the administrative headquarters of the Supaul district in
the Indian state of Bihar. The town was earlier a part of the Saharsa district. The average
elevation of the town is 34 m above Mean Sea Level and is situated at 25.93° N and 86.25° E.
2.1 State and District
Bihar is considered as a part of Eastern as well as Northern India. It is the 13th-largest state
of India and is the third-largest state of India by population. The state is entirely land–
locked, although the outlet to the sea through the port of Kolkata is not far away. Bihar lies
midway between the humid West Bengal in the east and the sub humid Uttar Pradesh in the
west which provides it with a transitional position in respect of climate, economy and
culture. The state is bounded by Nepal in the north and Jharkhand in the south. Bihar is
divided into two unequal halves by the river Ganga that flows through the middle of the
state from west to east. The district of Supaul is one of the thirty-eight districts of Bihar
spreading over an area of about 2425 km2 approximately. Supaul is situated in the northern
part of Bihar with Madhubani district in the west, Saharsa and Madhepura districts in the
south, Araria district in the west and Nepal in the north. The district is divided into eleven
blocks and consists of about five hundred and fifty six villages totally. The location of the
Supaul district in the Indian state of Bihar is shown in Fig- 1 & 2.
10
CSIR-NEERI
Figure 1 Aerial View of Supaul

Figure 2 Location of Supaul District

2.2 Topography
The Supaul district is sub divided into three geomorphologic sections as follows,
 Newer Flood Plain
 Older Flood Plain
 Older Alluvial Plain
The flood plain mainly occur along the river courses and is having largely low lying areas
with sand, silt and clay. The old flood plains also consist of sand, silt, clay and the soil is
termed to be highly fertile soils and is mostly under paddy cultivation. The older alluvial
plains are generally uplands and consist of clayey silt, clay and occasional Kankars.
2.3 Climate and Rainfall
The district experiences a humid climate throughout the year except during summer, which
is hot and dry. The maximum temperature of the district ranges from 35°C to 43°C during
summer between the months March to May, whereas the lowest temperature ranges from
7° C to 9°C during winter season between the months November to February. The monsoon
season usually starts from June and continues to lash with heavy rains throughout the
district till the end of October month. The average temperature of the district is 31°C and
the normal rainfall for the district is 1404 mm.
2.4 Transport Connectivity
Owing to the vagaries of the Koshi River, the transport connectivity via roadways, railways
or waterways of the district gets affected frequently during rainy seasons.
Roadways: The district is well connected by the National Highways NH-106 and NH- 107
from Patna and Kolkata. The State Highways SH- 66 and SH-76 also connects the district also
the East-West Corridor i.e., NH-57 passes through the Supaul district. Also number of
bridges had been constructed in various parts of the town for ease of transportation.
Railways: A branch line of Northeastern railway line from Mansi to Forbesganj passes
through the district and the trains stop at the Garhbaruari railway station of the district.
13
CSIR-NEERI
Airways: An airport is located in the district at Birpur and is under the maintenance of the
Public Works Department (PWD) of the state.
2.5 Tourism and Cultural Importance
Despite being a small town, Supaul has much to explore and experience. The town guards its
old age traditions boasting several important places of worships. The Hanuman Mandir
located within the town is a popular shrine with beautiful carvings and the temple attracts
devotees as well tourists in large numbers. The other popular religious site is the
Kapileshear temple, which is dedicated to the Mahadev or Lord Shiva, is widely known for its
historic value. The annual festival of Mahashivratri is the best time to visit, during which the
celebration is carried out with amid performances of folk dances like Jumri, Kajari and Paika.
The Kisan Bhawan located within the town is an informative Centre about the agricultural
activities and the farming community of the district. The other widely popular tourist
attractions are Dharahara, Vishnu Mandir, Tintolia and Koshi River.
2.6 Forest and Wildlife
There are no wildlife sanctuaries or national parks situated inside the boundary of the
district; however, trees like Sisam, Eucalyptus, Gulmohar and Sakhua etc are planned to be
cultivated along the Koshi Canal under the Forest Extension Division of Purnia.
2.7 Soil and Agriculture
The soil of the district is alluvial in nature and is poorly drained type. The soil conditions
near to the Koshi channels possess sandy loam, loamy and sand character whereas the areas
away from the channel are of silty in nature. In general, the soil is fine textured away from
the river course and coarse textured along the river course.
Agriculture is the main occupation of the people of the Supaul district. The principal crops
grown in the district are maize, jute, wheat, barley, marua, paddy, sugarcane and oil seeds.
Sugar cane cultivation has been increased considerably in the recent years due to its
increasing demands. The cultivators are encouraged to grow the improved varieties of the
mentioned crops by the concerned department of the Government and one seed
14
CSIR-NEERI
multiplication farm has been opened in each community development block to support
agriculture in the district.
Livestock is also an important agricultural setting to produce labor and commodity in the
district. Cow and Buffalo farms are available in large quantities in the district and the fodder
for the cattle are usually the grass which grows along road sides and barren lands and
mainly the weed spring that comes up after harvesting of crops. Fishery is also an important
occupation and livelihood of the people of the district. Fishing is done in large scale and
there are thousands of fishermen who get employments in the numerous Jalkars and
Pokhars of the district.
2.8 Land Use and Land cover
The Landuse/Landcover of Supaul town is derived from analyzing Land sat 30 m spatial
resolution remote sensing satellite imagery [1] and is validated from India WRIS portal [2].
The Fig- 3 represents the eight land use classes of Supaul. As per the classification the
primary Landuse class is cropland or agricultural land. The percentage of different Landuse
with-in administrative boundary is shown in Table- 1.
15
CSIR-NEERI
Figure 3 LU/LC classification of Supaul Town
Table 1 Land Use Pattern
Sr. No. Landuse Area in km2 Percentage

1 Cropland 14.47 62.42
2 Fallow 1.62 06.99
3 Urban 3.35 14.45
4 Scrub Land 1.37 05.91
5 Plantation 0.82 03.54
6 Inland Water 0.96 04.14
7 Rural 0.54 02.33
8 Water 0.05 0.21
Total 23.18 100
16
CSIR-NEERI
3 Demographics
The Supaul town is sub-divided into twenty-eight wards and altogether comprises of about
12,448 families with a total population of 65,445 of which 34,425 males and 31,020 females
as per the census 2011. The detailed demographic profile of the Supaul district and Supaul
town as per the census 2011 is shown in the below Table-2. The following Fig-4 & Table 3
depicts the historical population of the Supaul town for the past six decades since 2011. The
following Table-4 shows the ward wise population of all 28 wards as per the census of India,
2011.
Table 2 District and City Demographic Profile (Source: Census of India, 2011)
Name Supaul District Supaul town

Total Population 22,29,076 65,445
Density of Population 919 2414
Male Population 11,55,283 34,425
Female Population 10,73,793 31,020
SC Population 3,54,249 6,883
ST Population 10,168 85
Household Size 5.6 5.9
Literacy Rate (%) 57.67 71.43
Sex Ratio 929 901
17
CSIR-NEERI
Figure 4 Bar Chart representation of population growth in Supaul
Table 3 Historical Population of Supaul Town
Year Population of Town

1961 17,460
1971 22,558
1981 30,732
1991 40,588
2001 54,085
2011 65,445
Table 4 Ward wise population of Supaul Town as per 2011 Census data
Ward No. Population Household Ward No. Population Household

1 2802 618 15 2018 422
2 1959 444 16 2251 448
3 2090 448 17 2459 469
4 2935 575 18 3005 595
5 4147 630 19 2652 474
6 2062 320 20 2017 389
18
CSIR-NEERI
Ward No. Population Household Ward No. Population Household

7 2150 415 21 2223 467
8 1505 306 22 2054 337
9 2120 370 23 2354 429
10 2368 454 24 2127 406
11 1949 363 25 2124 421
12 2275 454 26 4077 732
13 1984 383 27 1998 384
14 2516 470 28 1224 225
Total no of Population of all Wards 65,445
Total no of Household of all Wards 12,448
4 Pollution of River by Supaul Town
The present population of the Supaul town consisting of 28 wards is approximately 76,009.
River Gajna which is a tributary of River Koshi flows along the north-eastern side of the
Supaul town. At present, the Supaul town generates sewage quantity of about 8.21 MLD.
The town at present does not have any sewage treatment plant to treat the sewage
generated prior to its discharge. Hence all grey water and black water generated by the
population of the town is discharged directly into the Gajna River without any treatment,
subsequently contributing to the pollution load of Ganga at a later stage.
During site visit, sampling have been done at the upstream of town, downstream of town
and one drain outfall points where wastewater is being discharged to the River. Locations of
sampling and the results of the analysis are shown in the below Table 5 respectively. The
untreated sewage discharge will certainly pollute the surface water and the rivers that come
in contact with the sewage resulting in increased pollution load as well as outbreak of
various water borne diseases to the inhabitants of the region.
19
CSIR-NEERI
Table 5 Location and Water Quality analysis results of River Gajna
Monitoring Sites of River Gajna

Parameters
u/s of town d/s of town Drain outfall 1 Drain outfall 2
Latitude 26.142221 26.118891 26.131473 26.125619

Location
Longitude 86.620367 86.584878 86.601851 86.598869
pH 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5
BOD, Total (mg/l) 78 85 103
DO (mg/l) 3.6 2.8 1.7

Faecal Coliform
76*105 79*105 88*105
(MNP/100 ml)
Total Coliform
179*105 155*105 184*105
(MNP/100 ml)
Odour Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable
Temperature (°C) 18 16 20
Electrical Conductivity
1800 2400 1680
(µmhos/cm)
Turbidity (NTU) 18 15 21
TDS 283 297 315

Nitrite and Nitrate
0.2 0.23 0.4
Nitrogen (NO2+NO3)
Total Phosphate
0.03 0.01 0.023
(Total P) (mg/l)
COD (mg/l) 112 105 121
Note: As there are no sewage treatment plants and water works sites in Supaul, samplings
could not be done for those points. Water quality of ghats is considered in d/s of outfall of
major drain.
5 River Ganga
The Ganges River or Ganga is a great river of the plains of the northern subcontinent. The
river is considered to be a holy river, runs for a length of 2510 km rising from Himalayas and
ends emptying into the Bay of Bengal. The river at its origin is fed by the melting stone of
the Himalayas. More than 95% of the Gangetic plain is converted to agriculture due to its
fertile nature. Some of the plain includes urban areas as well.
20
CSIR-NEERI
The important river of the country for the recent past decades suffers from extreme
pollution levels due to rapid urbanization and development of industries close to the river.
The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) monitors the water quality of the ricer at various
locations and characterizes the samples collected. The parameters for analysis include pH,
TSS, BOD, COD, DP, Total and Fecal Coliform level etc. The various monitoring and analysis
data published by CPCB in its reports during recent years for pre-monsoon and post-
monsoon seasons of drains discharged to Ganga, river, surface and ground water quality
data are shown in Table- 6 to Table- 14. The highlighted rows in the Table- 6, 7 and 8 are the
drains that flow through the Bihar state, among the drains of other states which depicts the
organic load and flow rate of the drains as per CPCB study report. The River map of Bihar
state is shown in the following Fig- 5.
21
CSIR-NEERI
Figure 5 Ganga River Map in Bihar

Table 6 Summary of Identified and Priority Drains discharged into River Ganga (1)
No. of No. of No. of Flow of BOD Load of
State/Phase/Segment Priority Drains Priority Priority Priority
Towns Monitored Drains Drains (MLD) Drains (TPD)
Uttarakhand Phase-I
Segment-A (Gangotri to 05 14 14 403.21 23.19
Roorkee D/S)
Uttar Pradesh Phase-I

Segment-B (Haridwar D/S 07 32 30 578.81 55.08
to Kanpur D/S to Unnao)
Uttar Pradesh Phase-II
06 37 26 1125.73 66.58
(Unnao D/S to UP Border)
Bihar Phase-III (UP Border

05 22 21 1087.18 39.47
to Jharkhand)
Jharkhand Phase-III (UP
01 02 02 42.56 2.48
Border to Jharkhand)
West Bengal Phase-IV

(Jharkhand Border to Bay 34 61 58 7375.02 241.17
of Bengal)
Total 58 168 151 10,612.51 427.97

Source: CPCB Data, Pre-Monsoon Study, 2018 (Summary of identified and priority drains
monitored during pre-monsoon season
Priority Drains Priority Drains

BOD
Town/ of of Flow BOD Pollution Present
Load
Catchment Post-Monsoon, Pre-Monsoon, (MLD) (mg/L) Sources Status
2016 (TPD)
2018
Buxer Sidnath Drain Sidnath Drain 2.46 0.12 48 Domestic Flow
Buxer Nath Baba Drain Nath Baba Drain 20.38 0.22 11 Domestic Flow
Buxer Tadka Drain Tadka Drain 9.43 0.74 78 Domestic Flow
Buxer Sariupur Drain Sariupur Drain 7.35 0.14 19 Domestic Flow

Danapur Cantt Danapur Cantt
Buxer 50.64 0.18 18 Domestic Flow
Drain Drain
Digha Ghat
Patna Digha Ghat Drain 97.69 2.54 26 Domestic Flow
Drain
Patna Kurzi Drain Kurzi Drain 98.77 3.95 40 Mixed Flow
Patna Rajapur Drain Rajapur Drain 178.69 6.43 36 Domestic Flow
Bansh Ghat
Patna Bansh Ghat Drain 160.31 11.54 72 Domestic Flow
Drain
Collectriate Collectriate Ghat
Patna 30.33 1.97 65 Domestic Flow
Ghat Drain Drain
Mittan Ghat Mittan Ghat
Patna 17.22 1.52 88 Domestic Flow
Drain Drain
Munger ITC Drain ITC Drain - - - Domestic Dry
Priority Drains Priority Drains

BOD
Town/ of of Flow BOD Pollution Present
Load
Catchment Post-Monsoon, Pre-Monsoon, (MLD) (mg/L) Sources Status
2016 (TPD)
2018
Lal Darwaja Lal Darwaja
Munger 27.16 0.54 20 Domestic Flow
drain drain
Bhagalpur Jamunia Drain Jamunia Drain 31.03 2.86 92 Domestic Flow
Bhagalpur Adampur Drain Adampur Drain 30.67 1.73 57 Domestic Flow
Bhagalpur Sarkikal Drain Sarkikal Drain 29.23 1.11 58 Domestic Flow
Bhagalpur Saklichand Drain Saklichand Drain 42.30 1.52 36 Domestic Flow
Bhagalpur Barari Ghat Drain Barari Ghat Drain 1.57 0.09 56 Domestic Flow
Manik Sarkar
Manik Sarkar
Bhagalpur Drain is Adampur - - - - -
Drain
Drain
Bhagalpur DN Singh Drain DN Singh Drain 2.60 0.27 165 Domestic Flow
Bhagalpur Koyal Ghat Drain Koyal Ghat Drain 24.36 1.44 59 Domestic Flow
Kahalgaon Kowa Drain Kowa Drain 224.99 0.56 3 Mixed Flow
Total 1087.1 39.47
Source: Identified Drains Pre-monsoon, CPCB, 2018
25
CSIR-NEERI
Dry/
Tapped/ Organic
Sr. Flow/ Flow in
Catchment Name of Drain Latitude Longitude Partly Load
No Standing MLD
Tapped in TPD
1. Buxer Sidnath Drain 25°34'431" 83°58'344" X Flow 1.29 0.15

2. Buxer Nath Baba Drain 25°34'200" 83°58'553" X Flow 8.42 0.08
3. Buxer Tadka Drain 25°34'366" 83°58'213" X Flow 3.13 0.52
4. Buxer Sariupur Drain 25°34'577" 83°59'971" X Flow 7.2 0.19
5. Buxer Danapur Cantt Drain 25°38'349" 85°02'650" X Flow 50.64 0.2
6. Patna Digha Ghat Drain 25°38'864" 85°04'806" X Flow 52.66 1.37
7. Patna Kurzi Drain 25°38'564" 85°06'365" X Flow 81.46 1.22
8. Patna Rajapur Drain 25°37'450" 85°07'468" X Flow 123.42 5.06
9. Patna Bansh Ghat Drain 25°37'385" 85°08'036" X Flow 151.2 10.89
10. Patna Collectriate Ghat 25°37'349" 85°09'031" X Flow 36.00 2.59

Drain
11. Patna Mittan Ghat Drain 25°36'384" 85°13'071" X Flow 4.38 0.29
12. Munger ITC Drain --------- --------- Dry X - -
13. Munger Lal Darwaja drain 25°23'88" 86°29'42" X Flow 22.88 0.55
14. Bhagalpur Jamunia Drain --------- --------- Dry X - -
15. Bhagalpur Adampur Drain 25°15'426" 86°58'937" X Flow 42.79 1.28
16. Bhagalpur Sarkikal Drain 25°15'729" 86°59'765" X Flow 13.16 0.63
26
CSIR-NEERI
Dry/
Tapped/ Organic
Sr. Flow/ Flow in
Catchment Name of Drain Latitude Longitude Partly Load
No Standing MLD
Tapped in TPD
17. Bhagalpur Saklichand Drain 25°15'239" 86°58'405" X Flow 19.87 2.19

18. Bhagalpur Barari Ghat Drain 25°16.192' 087°01.219' X Flow 4.72 0.12
19. Bhagalpur Manik Sarkar Drain 25°15.425' 086°58.937' Dry X - -
20. Bhagalpur DN Singh Drain 25°15.315' 086°58.611' Dry X - -
21. Bhagalpur Koyal Ghat Drain 25°15.617' 086°59.307' Dry X - -
22. Kahalgaon Kowa Drain 25°15'147" 87°13'752" X Flow 12.96 0.03
Total 636.18 27.36
Source: Identified Drains Phase Wise 31.05.2017, CPCB Report, 2016 (Oct to Dec) Post Monsoon Season
Dry/
Tapped/ Flow Organic
Sr. Name of Flow/
Catchment Latitude Longitude Partly in Load
No. Drain Standing
Tapped MLD in TPD
Gopal Pull
1. Sahebganj 25°14.919' 087°38.177' X X 12.02 2.22
Nallah
2. Sahebganj Jharna Nallah 25°14.919' 087°38.555' X X 18.66 0.78
Total 30.68 3.00
Source: Identified Drains Phase Wise 31.05.2017, CPCB Report, 2016 (Oct to Dec) Post Monsoon Season
27
CSIR-NEERI
Table 10 Water Quality Report of River Ganga
Faecal Total
Dissolved Nitrate-N+
Stati Temp Conductivity BOD Coliform Coliform
Oxygen pH Nitrite-N
on Station Name State °c (µmhos/cm) (mg/l) (MPN/100ml (MPN/100ml
(mg/l) (mg/l)
No. Name ) )
min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max
<2500 <5000
Water Quality Criteria >4 mg/l 6.5-8.5 <3 mg/l
MPN/100ml MPN/100ml
GANGA AT
1704 BIHAR 22 33 6 9 7.5 8.2 320 750 2.4 2.9 0 0 900 2600 5000 5000
BUXAR
GANGA AT
2551 BUXAR,RAMREKH BIHAR 22 32 5.5 8.8 7.4 8.3 288 756 2.4 2.8 0 0 1100 3000 3000 9000
AGHAT
GANGA U/S
1077 BIHAR 21 31 7.2 8.6 7.2 8.3 169 549 1.8 2.9 0 0 800 2600 2200 5000
KHURJI,PATNA
GANGA AT
CONFLUENCE OF
2564 SONE BIHAR 19 30 7 9.6 7.7 8.4 204 534 2 2.8 0 0 500 2100 1100 4800
DORIGANJ,CHAPR
A
GANGA
2552 DARBHANGA BIHAR 16 30 6.5 8.6 7.4 8.3 236 550 2.2 3 0 0 900 9000 3000 24000
GHAT AT PATNA
GANGA D/S
1079 PATNA (GANGA BIHAR 17 30 6.2 8.6 7.4 8.3 220 571 2.3 2.8 0 0 900 9000 2200 9000
BRIDGE)
28
CSIR-NEERI
Faecal Total
Oxygen pH Nitrite-N
(mg/l) (mg/l)
No. Name ) )
GANGA AT
2555 BIHAR 18 30 6.5 8.3 7.2 8.3 220 925 2.5 2.8 0 0 1100 2300 3000 5000
PUNPUN,PATNA
GANGA AT
2553 BIHAR 18 32 6.8 8.4 7.2 8.2 221 574 2 2.8 0 0 900 2600 3000 5000
FATUHA
GANGA U/S
1817 BIHAR 17 29 7.6 9.8 7.8 8.6 227 473 2 2.8 0 0 800 2200 1700 5000
MOKAMA
GANGA D/S
1815 BIHAR 17 29 7.5 9.6 7.7 8.0 234 469 2.1 2.7 0 0 800 2200 1700 5000
MOKAMA
GANGA AT
1818 BIHAR 16 29 6.9 9.7 7.6 7.9 254 519 2.2 2.8 0 0 900 3000 1700 8000
MUNGER
GANGA AT
2554 SULTANGANJ,BH BIHAR 14.5 26 7.1 9.6 7.8 8.1 209 455 2.2 2.8 0 0 900 3000 2200 9000
AGALPUR
GANGA AT
1819 BIHAR 16 28 6.9 9.4 7.6 8.1 98 573 2.3 2.8 0 0 800 2600 2200 5000
BHAGALPUR
GANGA AT
1816 BIHAR 14 28 7.2 9.6 7.8 8.1 236 536 2.4 2.8 0 0 900 2600 3000 5000
KAHALGAON
GANGA AT D/S
3113 BUXAR NEAR BIHAR 22 32 5.2 8.8 7.5 8.1 323 771 2.4 2.9 0 0 400 2600 900 5000
GANGA BRIDGE
3114 GANGA NEAR BIHAR 21 35 7.5 8.8 7.1 8.3 191 581 2 2.9 0 0 700 2200 1700 8000
29
CSIR-NEERI
Faecal Total
Oxygen pH Nitrite-N
(mg/l) (mg/l)
No. Name ) )
DANAPUR(NEAR
PIPA PUL)
3115 GANGA AT BARH BIHAR 18 28 7.6 9.8 7.8 8.1 225 521 2 2.9 0 0 800 2700 1300 5000
GANGA AT U/S
MUNGER (NEAR
3116 BIHAR 16 30 7.1 9.8 7.8 8.1 228 544 2 2.8 0 0 300 2100 1300 5000
INTAKE WELL ON
GANGA)
GANGA AT U/S
3117 BIHAR 14 29 7.1 9.6 7.7 8.1 229 252 2.3 2.9 0 0 500 3000 1100 9000
SULATANGANJ
GANGA AT U/S
3118 BIHAR 14.5 26 7.1 9.6 7.8 8.1 209 455 2.2 2.8 0 0 800 2200 1700 5000
BHAGALPUR
GANGA AT
3122 MALSALAMI, BIHAR 19 34 6.5 8.4 7.4 8.3 285 630 2.2 2.8 0 0 1100 2600 3000 5000
PATNA
GANGA AT
3123 BIHAR 14 30 7.6 9.7 7.8 8.1 225 516 2 2.9 0 0 700 2200 1700 5000
BARAHIA
Source: CPCB Report, 2018
30
CSIR-NEERI
Table 11 Comparison Summary of Flow and BOD Load in drains in Pre & Post Monsoon Seasons
Pre-Monsoon, 2018 Post-Monsoon, 2018
Mixed Domestic Total
State/ Priority BOD
Priority Priority Priority Flow Flow BOD Load
Phase/Segment Towns Load
Drains Drains Drains (MLD) (MLD) (TPD)
(TPD)
Bihar Phase-III
(UP Border to 05 02 19 21 1087.18 39.47 984.99 40.55
Jharkhand)
Source: Identified Drains, CPCB Report, 2018 (Pre-Monsoon and Post Monsoon)
Table 12 Comparison of Flow and BOD Load in drains in Pre & Post Monsoon Seasons
Bihar, Phase-III (UP Border to Jharkhand)

Pre-Monsoon, Post-Monsoon,
No. of 2018 2018 Sampling/ Confluence
Monito Catchment/ Priority Drains Pollution Status
BOD BOD Industries
red Town with Sl. No. Flow Flow Sources Latitude
Load Load Longitude
Drains (MLD) (MLD)
(TPD) (TPD)
84. Buxer Sidnath Drain 2.46 0.12 3.07 0.21 Domestic Flow 25.345300 83.584770
85 Buxer Nath Baba Drain 20.38 0.22 22.58 0.72 Domestic Flow 25.342270 83.580250
86 Buxer Tadka Drain 9.43 0.74 11.79 1.27 Domestic Flow 25.346210 83.583520
87 Buxer Sariupur Drain 7.35 0.14 8.96 0.40 Domestic Flow 25.356500 83.590760
31
CSIR-NEERI

BOD BOD Industries
Load Load Longitude
Drains (MLD) (MLD)
(TPD) (TPD)
88 Buxer Danapur Cantt 50.64 0.18 8.68 0.29 Domestic Flow 25.383900 85.026500
Drain
89 Patna Digha Ghat Drain 97.69 2.54 86.40 2.07 Domestic Flow 25.390640 85.045320
Coca Cola &

90 Patna Kurzi Drain 98.77 3.95 64.80 2.85 Mixed Flow 22.332290 88.195060
Engineering
91 Patna Rajapur Drain 178.69 6.43 155.52 6.22 Domestic Flow 25.373560 85.073390
92 Patna Bansh Ghat Drain 160.31 11.54 143.04 7.30 Domestic Flow 25.372460 85.080340
93 Patna Collectriate Ghat 30.33 1.97 34.56 2.49 Domestic Flow 22.372200 85.090890
Drain
94 Patna Mittan Ghat Drain 17.22 1.52 16.20 1.20 Domestic Flow 25.362330 85.130460
95 Munger ITC Drain - - - - Domestic Dry - -
96 Munger Lal Darwaja drain 27.16 0.54 28.98 2.26 Domestic Flow 25.235520 86.292160
97 Bhagalpur Jamunia Drain 31.03 2.86 33.61 2.35 Domestic Flow 25.143180 86.552500
32
CSIR-NEERI

BOD BOD Industries
Load Load Longitude
Drains (MLD) (MLD)
(TPD) (TPD)
98 Bhagalpur Adampur Drain 30.67 1.73 32.72 1.70 Domestic Flow 25.152970 86.585620
99 Bhagalpur Sarkikal Drain 29.23 1.11 31.97 4.22 Domestic Flow 25.158400 86.597690
100 Bhagalpur Saklichand Drain 42.30 1.52 43.87 3.69 Domestic Flow 25.151690 86.582420
101 Bhagalpur Barari Ghat Drain 1.57 0.09 2.40 0.06 Domestic Flow 25.161230 87.013030
102 Manik Sarkar

Bhagalpur Drain is Adampur Non Priority & Removed
Drain
103 Bhagalpur DN Singh Drain 2.60 0.27 2.60 0.06 Domestic Flow 25.256530 86.976530
104 Bhagalpur Koyal Ghat Drain 24.36 1.44 25.58 0.61 Domestic Flow 25.261328 86.987770
105 Kahalgaon Kowa Drain 224.99 0.56 227.66 0.57 Mixed Flow 25.152400 87.135570 Engineering
Source: Identified Drains, CPCB Report, 2018
33
CSIR-NEERI
Table 13 Water Quality of Lakes and Ponds in Bihar, 2016
Dissolved Nitrate-N+ Faecal Total

Type Temperatur Conductivity BOD
Station Station of State Oxygen pH Nitrite-N Coliform Coliform
e° c (µmhos/cm) (mg/l)
Code Name Water Name (mg/l) (mg/l) (MPN/100ml) (MPN/100ml)
Body
<2500 <5000
Water Quality Criteria >4 mg/l 6.5-8.5 <3 mg/l
MPN/100ml MPN/100ml
KAWAR
2557 LAKE, Lake BIHAR 25 30 6.6 7.9 7.2 7.7 251 341 2.6 2.9 0 0 1330 2200 4000 4900
BEGUSARAI
MOTI JHEEL
2571 AT Lake BIHAR 16 33 5 8.6 7.4 8.7 257 997 2.6 3 0 0 800 2600 1700 4100
MOTIHARI
TIGHI
2573 TALAB AT Pond BIHAR 12 36 6.5 7.8 7.2 8.6 172 1920 2.4 2.6 0 0 800 3000 2400 9000
GAYA
SURAJ
2574 KUND AT Pond BIHAR 12 36 6.3 6.5 7.5 8.1 178 924 2.6 3.1 0 0 800 5000 1700 16000
GAYA
Source: Water Quality Data 2016 Lakes, Ponds and Tanks, CPCB ENVIS
Table 14 Ground Water Quality Data in Bihar, 2016
Total
Nitrate-N+ Faecal
Temperature Conductivity BOD
pH Nitrite- Coliform Coliform
Station State
Station Name °C (µmhos/cm) (mg/l) N(mg/l)
Code (MPN/100ml) (MPN/100ml)
Name
min max min max min max min max min max min max min max
<2500 <5000
Water Quality Criteria 6.5-8.5 <3 mg/l
MPN/100ml MPN/100ml
SUPAUL HAND
3155 PUMP WATER BIHAR 25 37 7.5 7.5 970 970 0 0
AT BUS STAND
Source: Water Quality Data 2016 Groundwater, CPCB Report ENVIS
35
CSIR-NEERI
6 Water Supply in Town
The per capita water supply for Supaul town will be 135 lpcd as per the data provided by the
ULB as attached in Annexure- 7. The present population of the town is approximately 76009
that include all 28 wards. With per capita water consumption of 135 LPCD, the total water
consumption of the town is 10.26 MLD. This demand is met by ground water source, as the
population meets its daily water demand from bore wells, open wells as well as hand
pumps. The implementation of central water supply scheme is under process as on
September, 2018 as per the ULB, attached in Annexure- 7. The ground water table of Supaul
varies between 3 m to 5 m.
7 Solid Waste Management
The town does not have any solid waste management scheme or facilities as per the ULB.
However the ULB expects the schemes to be implemented near future. The solid wastes
generated on day to day basis or randomly disposed off.
8 Soil Condition
Soil investigation has been carried out at four locations in Supaul. Soil samples were lifted
from deeper depths by drilling bore holes using mechanical devices called samplers.
Samples were analyzed for its penetration test and hydrology of soil.
Figure 6 Image showing Soil Investigation using Bore Hole Mechanism near Govt. Engineering
College, Supaul
The image of trial pit prepared for investigation in the proposed Site for STP is shown in the
above Fig- 6. Image of the NEERI team on discussion with BUIDCO and ULB at Supaul site
prior to soil investigation is attached as Fig- 7.
Figure 7 Discussions of NEERI team with ULB prior to Soil Conditions Investigation
The soil investigation of soil strata is carried out based on the physical observations and by
using bore hole mechanism at various locations in Supaul Town. Results are shown in the
below Table- 15.
Table 15 Type of Soil at Supaul
Sr. Depth SBC

Location Type of Soil
No. (m) (T/Sq.m)
1.5 Sandy alluvial 0.6
Near Chandragupta 3 Filled up soils 8

1
temple 4.5 Weathered rock 18
6 Weathered rock 18.5
3 Filled up soils 11
2 Near Railway Station
4.5 Weathered rock 19
6 Weathered rock 22
3 Opp. Pipra Khurd road, 1.5 Sandy alluvial 1.1
37
CSIR-NEERI
Sr. Depth SBC

Location Type of Soil
No. (m) (T/Sq.m)
Nr. Sahil electronics 3 Filled up soils 9
and
mobile shop 4.5 Weathered rock 16
6 Weathered rock 17.5
3 Filled up soils 9.5
4 Nr. Navodaya Vidyalaya
4.5 Weathered rock 15
6 Weathered rock 18
9 Sanitation and Sewerage
The town does not have any sewage treatment plant. The grey water and black water
generated in houses and colonies are connected to septic tanks and soak pits, from where
the overflow enters the drains and it finally gets discharged in open lands or into the river
untreated. This condition of unlined outfall and discharge of sewage into low lying open
lands was also confirmed by a team of BUIDCO, Patna and IIT-Roorkee personnel. The report
is attached as Annexure 8.
10 Need for I&D Works
Details topographical survey of town shows that the natural slope of town discharges the
total sewage of the whole town into the Gajna River through existing drains with 3 major
outfalls from Zone I, II & IV and 3 minor outfalls from Zone- III. The River Gajna being a
confluence of River Koshi which finally meets River Ganga naturally contributes to its
pollution load due to its carrying of untreated sewage of the town. This treats the sewage
generated by the town to meet the discharge standards for land or water bodies.
Hence in order to achieve the mandate of Clean Ganga Mission and also to provide a proper
sanitation for the locality people, it is required to carry out the interception and diversion of
drains followed by STP. Also during monsoon, the widespread and long duration water
logging causes disruption of normal life and hardship to many residents. Various causes can
be attributed to these critical water logging problems following the monsoon rains. Some of
38
CSIR-NEERI
these causes are manmade modifications in the natural drainage patterns and catchment
areas due to various construction works, including housing, and major roads without
adequate culverts, unplanned development in many areas without properly planned urban
infrastructure, unauthorized constructions blocking or hindering smooth flow in the Nallah
and drains. Few more factors are following:
 Most of the drains and main outlets are choked with solid waste and Plastics.
 Many drains are kutcha drains and are not properly connected to main trunk drains
and outlets.
 Invert levels of the existing drains are not appropriate.
 Volumetric capacity of the existing drains is improper.
 Drains along the roads are in a poor condition.
11 Design Criteria
The guidelines for "Preparation of DPRs for works of Interception and Diversion of drains
and Sewage Treatment Plants" by National Mission for Clean Ganga in Aug 2018, is followed
in preparation of this DPR.
11.1 Categorization of Towns on the Basis of I&D and Treatment Infrastructure
Towns/cities may fall in several categories based on the type of the existing arrangements
for the collection, conveyance and treatment of wastewater.
i. Category I- In this category of towns / cities there may not be any sewers and the
wastewater including that from the septic tanks and toilets would flow in the covered
or uncovered drains on the sides of the streets reaching a storm water drain, which in
turn would discharge into the Ganga.
ii. Category II- In this category of towns/cities, there may be localities where sewers are
laid and localities not provided with sewers. The wastewater would be carried through
the sewer or the drain to a sewage treatment plant (STP). If a STP has not been
installed, the wastewater would be discharged into the Ganga.
39
CSIR-NEERI
iii. Category III- In this category of towns, I&D and STP schemes may have been
constructed. However, the system is unable to handle the entire wastewater and
there is need to repair, upgrade and refurbish the existing infrastructure.
As per the existing arrangements for the collection, conveyance and treatment of
wastewater the Supaul Town falls in Category-I as above.
11.2 Design of system and components
To improve the environment of any city/town, water and wastewater management is the
major concern by implementing sewage collection, treatment and disposal or reuse. Besides
these, other components are low cost sanitation, crematoria, municipal waste management,
human resource development and industrial strengthening etc. This DPR deals with the
interception and diversion of drains and STP design for sewage, treatment and disposal.
Domestic sewage consists of mainly liquid waste from toilets, kitchen, baths and washing of
floors. Thus liquid waste of any city or town, having no industries, is purely of domestic in
nature. It is generally conveyed to a suitable place out of the limits of the proposed master
plan area through sewers/rising main and then treated to meet the discharge norms laid
down by the concerned authorities for final disposal on to the land or natural water courses.
11.3 Design Periods
Design periods for sewerage mains and STPs have been often debated due to cost
considerations. Keeping in view the resource constraints and optimum utilization of assets,
a modular approach is followed for the different components of the system. The year of
expected commissioning of the project shall be taken as the base year (3 years from present
year) for design of various components of all projects. The design period for the Supaul
town is reckoned up to year 2052 i.e. 30 years from the base year 2022. Besides this design
periods of various components, as prescribed by CPHEEO Sewerage Manual, 2013 are as
given below in Table- 16.
40
CSIR-NEERI
Table 16 Design periods of interception and diversion
Sr. Design period, Design Period* Years

Component
No from base year (from base year)
Land will be required to add STP

1 Land acquisition 30 years or more modules later. Accordingly, land
should be acquired.
2 Interceptions 30 Years -
Conventional
3 30 Years -
sewers (A)
Non - conventional
4 15 Years -
sewers (B)
Pumping Mains In case of low velocities, dual
5 30 Years
pumping mains to be examined
Pumping Stations – Cost of civil works is economical
6 30 Years
civil works for full design period.
Pumps &
7 15 Years Considering modular approach
Machineries
Sewage Treatment Construction may be done with
Plants a modular approach in a phased
8 15 Years
manner as the population
grows.
Effluent disposal Provision of design capacities in
9 30 Years the initial stages itself is
economical
10 Effluent Utilization 30 Years 15 years or as the case may be
*Source: 1) Table 2-1 of CPHEEO Manual on Sewerage and Sewage Treatment Systems, Nov
2013
2) Guidelines for preparation of DPRs for works of I&D, NMCG, Aug 2018
11.4 Required rate of water supply, as per CPHEEO Manual
Municipal or sanitary sewers are normally designed to carry the peak residential,
commercial and industrial flow, including the infiltration, where such condition exists. The
computation of design flow is governed by rate of water supply in the project area.
As per CPHEEO Manual on Water Supply and Treatment 1999, the recommended values of
water supply for domestic and non-domestic purposes are shown in the below Table- 17.
41
CSIR-NEERI
Table 17 Recommended Per Capita Water Supply Levels for Designing Schemes
Recommended Maximum
Sr.
Classification of Towns / Cities Water Supply Levels (LPCD)
No.
(as per CPHEEO manual)
1 Towns provided with piped water supply but 70

without sewerage system
2 Cities provided with piped water supply where 135

sewerage system is existing or contemplated
Metropolitan and mega cities provided with
3 piped water supply where sewerage system is 150
existing or contemplated
Source: Manual on Water Supply and Treatment, 1999, Table 2.1 Page 11
Supaul is a fastest growing city and falls under the category no. 2 of the above-mentioned
table 17. Hence, recommended maximum water supply is 135 LPCD be used to estimate the
per capita water supply.
Unaccounted for Water i.e. maximum of 15 % of average daily demand to accommodate

distribution losses including theft, leakage, unmetered consumptions etc, is usually
considered while establishing water demand does not reach household along with 135 LPCD
and hence not likely to enter sewerage collection network.
Sewage generation estimates for project town shall be done based on 135 litre/capita/day
as the water supply rate, as mentioned above and 80% of water supply as sewage
generation in accordance with the CPHEEO guidelines. Though at present Supaul does not
have any water supply scheme and the present population depends on individual open and
bore wells, the water supply scheme is under implementation and is to be streamlined in
near future.
11.5 Interception Factor
In tropical countries like India, dry weather flow reaching the sewer system is less than that
of the per capita water supply due to loss of some water in leakage and evaporation. It
varies from 40% of water supplied in arid regions to 90% in well developed areas. For design
42
CSIR-NEERI
purposes, interception factor or return factor may be adopted as 0.80 in developed areas.
However, conventional sewers shall be designed for a minimum sewage flow of 135 lpcd.
11.6 Design Flows
The design flow is the sewage generated for the years 2037 and 2052, based on the
forecasted population and the per capita water consumption rate. Sewers are designed to
carry peak residential, commercial and industrial flows and normal infiltration where
unfavourable condition exists. Minimum flow may vary from 1/3 to 1/2 of average flow. For
population less than 10,000, Babbitt’s formula with minimum and maximum limit of 3.0 and
6.0 respectively may be used.
As per the recommendations given in CPHEEO, peak factor for contributory population is as
follows in Table- 18.
Table 18 Peak Factor for Contributory Population
Contributory Population Peak Factor

Upto 20,000 3.0
20,000-50,000 2.5
50,000-7,50,000 2.25
Above 7,50,000 2
Source: Table 3.2 of CPHEEO Sewerage Manual 2013
Babbitt formula for peak factor = 5*P–02, where P is population in thousand.
11.7 Ground Water Infiltration
Infiltration is basically the ingress of ground water in to sewer lines through joints. This
phenomenon occurs where the water table is high. The inflow to sanitary sewers may also
include flows due to infiltration of groundwater through joints. As per CPHEEO manual,
since sewers are designed for peak discharges, allowances for groundwater infiltration for
the worst condition shall be made as per Table- 19 and that design infiltration value shall be
limited to a maximum of 10% of the design value of sewage flow.
43
CSIR-NEERI
Table 19 Ground Water Infiltration
Value
Sr. No. Basis of Computation
Minimum Maximum
1 Area Basis, lit/ha/day 5000 50000
2 Sewer Length Basis, lit/km-day 500 5000
3 Manhole Basis, lit/day/ manhole 250 500

Source: Table 3.3 of CPHEEO Sewerage Manual 2013
This will avoid design of oversize sewer pipe, which will ultimately leads to low velocities in
case infiltration assumed is on higher side.
11.8 Sewer Size
Minimum size of sewers recommended in CPHEEO manual is 200 mm for towns having
present/base year population of over 1, 00,000 and 150 mm in smaller towns. In hills,
minimum diameter of 100 mm shall be adopted. This criterion governing the minimum size
of gravity sewer is to reduce the possibility of clogging and attained self cleansing velocities
in small size sewer. However, based on the NMCG guidelines (2018) for works of I&D, the
interception and diversion sewers are to be designed for sewage generation in 30 years.
Hence in the case of Supaul town, the diameter of diversion sewers is considered not less
than 200 mm.
11.9 Velocity
In municipal sewers, solids tend to settle under low velocity conditions. It is recognized that
self-cleansing velocities must be developed at least once in a day to flush out the solids. A
good design is one which allows for generation of minimum velocity at initial flow conditions
above 0.6 m/s. For ultimate peak flow condition, the sewer shall be designed to attain a
velocity greater than 0.8 m/s. However, the maximum velocity not to be more than 3.0 m/s
so as to avoid erosion of pipes and damage to manholes in long term. In hills, CI/DI pipes
may be adopted along with suitable drop manhole arrangement to reduce the velocity
greater than 3 m/s.
44
CSIR-NEERI
11.10 Depth of Flow
Taking consideration of ventilation in municipal sewers, it is prescribed in the CPHEEO

manual that sewer should not be designed to run full. Accordingly the maximum depth of
flow is limited to 0.8 of the diameter at ultimate peak flow for ventilation.
11.11 Maximum Invert Depth
Maximum invert depth of the sewer shall be 6.0 m. However, since in Supaul town the
ground water table rangers between 4m to 5m, the maximum invert depth adopted is not
beyond 3 m.
11.12 Bedding for Pipes
The beddings which are generally adopted for laying sewers in trenches are of following
types and the load factors for different classes of bedding are given in Table- 20.
Class-A: Bedding may be concrete cradle or concrete arch
Class-B: Bedding having shaped bottom or compacted granular with a carefully
compacted backfill
Class-C: Ordinary bedding having a shaped bottom with lightly compacted backfill
Class-D: It is with flat bottom trench with no care being taken to secure compaction of
backfill
Table 20 Different Beddings for Pipes in Trenches
Load
Class Condition
factor
Aa Concrete cradle-plain concrete and lightly tamped backfill 2.2
Ab Concrete cradle-plain concrete with carefully tamped backfill 2.8

Ac Concrete cradle-RCC with P-0.4% Up to 3.4
Arch type concrete

Ad RCC with P-0.4% Up to 3.4
RCC with P-1.0% Up to 4.8
(P is the ratio of the area of steel to the area of concrete at the crown)
B Shaped bottom or compacted granular bedding with carefully 1.9

compacted backfill
45
CSIR-NEERI
Load
Class Condition
factor
Shaped bottom or compacted granular bedding with lightly compacted
C 1.5
backfill
D Flat bottom trench 1.1
Source: CPHEEO Manual on sewerage and sewage treatment (1993), Page 39
11.13 Earth Cushion
In general all the conduits are to be laid below the existing road surface with a minimum
earth cushion of 1.0 meter above the pipe. Wherever such earth cushion is not practically
feasible suitable encasement in concrete will be done.
11.14 Selection of Pipe
Material of sewer pipe had been recommended for proposed sewer interception and
diversion purpose keeping various techno-economical aspects such as ease in availability of
R.C.C Sewer pipes and skills for laying R.C.C. pipe locally available. Selection of class
between NP2, NP3 and NP4 of RCC pipes will depend upon the type of loading such pipes
are likely to be subjected to. Three Edge Bearing strengths of various classes of pipes against
various diameters and laying depth are calculated with total load on pipe comprising
working load, fill load and concentrated load.
Calculations with depicting loading pattern against various diameters of pipes against
various depths as developed and final pipe selection is adopted.
 Below 400 mm, RCC pipe of NP2 Class has been provided
 400 mm and above, R.C.C pipe of NP3 class is proposed.
11.15 Future Population
The population projection is a prerequisite for any infrastructure planning that provides the
base for the calculation of all future infrastructural and services demand of city. The project
cost and adequacy of planning is directly linked with the projected population and hence
population is arrived judiciously closer to actual projected population based on past decadal
growth rate pattern, land use and development pattern of the study area.
46
CSIR-NEERI
11.16 Interception & Diversion Works
a) The proposed Interception work shall contain barscreens, sewage sump pit, diversion
drain, etc.,
b) The interception pit shall be provided near to the outfall drains carrying sewage
which is collected in a sewage sump pit/chamber which is connected to a diversion
line in its bottom which the sewage reaches to the collection tank of the proposed
STP by gravity
c) During the site visit, it was observed that open storm water drain of approximate
width and depth 1.5 m x 2m are in existense that discharges the sewage of the town
into the open lands and water bodies. The storm water drain shall be directly
intercepted and diverted as briefed above.
d) During monsoon, the sewage flowing into the drains shall be supplemented by storm
water. During such conditions, the sluice gate shall be opened to allow rain water to
bypass the STP.
e) The diversion sewers provided is designed to meet the requirement of 2052, i.e., 30
years from the base year (2022).
11.17 Sewage Treatment Plant
Sewage treatment is the process of removing contaminants from municipal wastewater,

containing mainly household sewage along with negligible or no industrial wastewater. The
Physical, chemical, and biological processes of the treatment plants are used to remove
contaminants and discharge treated wastewater that is safe enough for release into the
environment. The prevalent and existing technologies of the nation for the treatment of
sewage are described as follows,
 Moving Bed Bioreactor

 Sequential Batch Reactor
 Phytorid Technology
From the above mentioned technologies, SBR and Phytorid are considered for treating the
Sewage generated in the Supaul town.
47
CSIR-NEERI
11.18 Sequential Batch Reactor
The sequential Batch Reactor is a popular method for the treatment process of wastewater,
which is a modification of activated sludge process. In SBR it is possible to meet the final
discharge standards by modification and addition of the operational units as per the
necessity and availability of area. As the name indicates, SBR treats sewage in batches
showing its operational flexibility and process control possibilities.
Figure 8 Flow Diagram- SBR
Similar to ASP, SBR also requires aerobic bacteria for working operations. Oxygen is added to
the mixture of sewage and the activated sludge which is already present in tank encouraging
the growth of aerobic bacteria results in reduction of the BOD and COD level of the inflow
wastewater. The final treated effluent meets discharge standards of discharge to the land as
well as water bodies and also shall be used for irrigation. SBR technology consists offensive
operating modes namely Fill, React, Settle, Draw and Idle. This technology incorporates a fill
and draw type treatment process that is during the operation out of two tank one tank is in
48
CSIR-NEERI
settle / vacant modes while the other is in filling mode. The time duration of each mode
within a tank can be adjusted as per the need of the treatment process. When single tank is in
use for treatment, the duration span is from start of fill mode to the end of idle mode, while
contrarily to that in multiple tanks it shall be ensured that the time taken for filling one tank
should be the time to draw the water from another tank. The Fig- 08 represents the flow
diagram of a STP based on SBR technology.
The working of each mode of SBR is explained briefly as follows,
Fill: In this, the basin receives wastewater from influent. Wastewater contains the microbes
due to which biochemical reaction takes place. Three kinds of fill are there i.e. static fill,
mixed fill and aerated fill, which operates singly or by combining it.
React: In this phase, the end biochemical reaction takes place intending in reduction of
organic matter like COB, BOD and removal of nutrient. Also, the anoxic or aerobic conditions
are generated by blowing the air. There are two kinds of react namely the mixed react and
aerated react. In mixed react, combination of anoxic and anaerobic conditions may be
generated, whereas the aerated react starts from the end of aerated fill.
Settle: This phase acts as a clarifier for removal of settled sludge.
Draw: This phase acts as a decanter to decant the treated water after the removal of wastes.
Idle: It is the last phase of the reactor tank. Generally, this phase is used when multiple
reactors are under operation. It is the time duration between the fill of one tank and draw of
another. During this phase, a small amount of activated sludge at the bottom of the SBR basin
is pumped out, a process called wasting of sludge.
11.18.1 Level of Automation
The SBR technology is based on moving media aerobic process, which needs no skilled
workers. The operations involved are ON / OFF of the pumps and air blower, sludge drains
and filter backwash. The pumps are provided with level switch for ON /OFF based on PLC
Program & the tank water level to avoid dry run and mechanical damage. The system is semi-
automatic.
49
CSIR-NEERI
11.18.2 Advantages of SBR
 When the availability of area is less, single tank can be used rather than the use
of multiple basins.
 Aerobic conditions results in the removal of phosphorus and low phosphorus
limits of less than 2 mg/L can be attained by using a combination of biological
treatment and chemical agents.
 Due to the addition of oxygen, reduced ammonia is converted into oxidized
nitrite and nitrate leading to de-nitrification.
 Low construction cost compared to other technologies.
 Stable quality of purified sewage.
 The system resistive to the variation sewage quality as well as quantity.
11.19 Phytorid Technology
The National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) has developed a novel
technology based on natural method of treatment of sewage using constructed wetlands.
The technology is named as PHYTORID and has been awarded one national and two
international patents. Use of plant species along with their root system along with the
natural attenuation processes can be combined together to get the Phytorid Technology. It
is one such technological solution, which can be easily implemented in cities as well as in
rural areas for treatment of wastewater. The system is based on use of specific plants
normally found in natural reed with filtration and treatment capability. This system can be
utilized for a wide variety of applications. It can be used for treatment of municipal
wastewater, sludge management, treatment of secondary and tertiary treated industrial or
agricultural effluent as well as for the treatment of landfill Leachate. PHYTORID technology
has been developed by NEERI especially for sewage treatment. NEERI is a government
research institute under Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. This is one of the
oldest and most reputed institutes for environmental research and consultancy. It is
important to note that the national environmental policy, 2006 also recommends use of
constructed wetland systems for efficient sewage treatment and use it gainfully for
agriculture and other purposes. The main objective of the proposed project is to provide a
50
CSIR-NEERI
simple, feasible, practically sound, eco-friendly, maintenance free and cost-effective

technology, which can handle the sewage waste water treatment leading to reuse of
treated water for purposes like gardening. Components of the system are shown in the
below Fig- 9.
Figure 9 Components of Phytorid based STP
The treatment process consists of primary treatment plant followed by Phytorid treatment
system. The hydraulic loading shall be started with 40% capacity in the beginning till the
time of acclimatization of the plants to the hydraulic load and shall be later increased to
100%.
Figure 10 Contaminant Removal Process in Phytorid Bed
The further loading and efficiency shall be monitored to establish how much more of either
hydraulic or BOD load can be effectively used. This would entirely depend upon the
51
CSIR-NEERI
variation in the sewage characteristics used for treatment. The contaminant removal
process of the Phytorid bed is depicted in Fig- 10.
 Treatment efficiencies for the removal of BOD, COD and Fecal Coliform are in the
range of 80-95%,
 Nutrients such as N and P are removed up to 80%, which is greater than the
traditional chemical methods.
 It is a very cost-effective technology when compared with the traditional wastewater
treatment methods.
 Since it utilizes natural vegetation and rhizosphere microorganisms, it is eco-friendly
method of treating sewage.
 An important factor to be considered is the aesthetic improvement that is provided
by this methodology.
 No rodents, insects and odor nuisance
 The treated water can be used for enhancement of environmental architecture such
as roadside fountains.
 The quality of treated water is comparable to irrigation standards
12 Treated Effluent Quality
The proposed STP is to be designed to meet the final discharge standards applicable to all
modes of disposal as per the Environment (Protection) Amendment Rules, 2017 notified on
13th October, 2017 attached as Annexure- 9 and also the discharge standards as per the NGT
order dated 30/04/2019 (M.A. No. 1792/2018, M.A No.1793/2018, I.A No. 150/2019 &I.A
No. 151/2019) attached as Annexure-10. The discharge norms as per the MoEF&CC
amendment is shown in Table- 21 and STP discharge norms as per NGT order is shown in
Table- 22.
52
CSIR-NEERI
Table 21 Effluent Discharge Standards (MoEF & CC Amendment, 2017)
Treated Sewage Discharge

Parameters
Standards
pH 6.5 - 9.0
BOD 30 PPM
TSS < 100 PPM
Faecal Coliform < 1000 PPM
The proposed STP shall be designed to meet the discharge norms as per the recent NGT
directions of uniform standards and parameters are listed in the table 22 below.
Table 22 STP discharge norms as per NGT order (2019)
Parameters Standards
pH 5.5 - 9.0
Bio-Chemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), mg/L 10
Total Suspended Solids (TSS), mg/L 20
Chemical Oxygen Demand, mg/L 50
Nitrogen- Total, mg/L 10
Phosphorus- Total (For Discharge into Ponds,
1.0
Lakes) , mg/L
Desirable- 100
Fecal Coliform (MPN/100ml)
Permissible- 230
13 Selection of Technology
The following are the major criteria involved in selection of technology for treatment of
sewage in a locality
 Area availability
 Capital Expenditures and Operational Cost
 Electricity Availability
 End use of treated water and bio-sludge generated
 Treatment capacity
 Process challenges
The differences of the two most common and effective technologies for treatment of
sewage are shown in the following Table - 23.
53
CSIR-NEERI
Table 23 Typical Treated Water Quality based on Technologies
Sequential Batch
Sr. No. Treated Water Parameters Phytorid
Reactor (SBR)
1 PH 5 to 7 5 to 7
2 BOD, mg/l <20 <20
3 COD, mg/l <50 <50
4 TSS, mg/l <50 <50
Fecal Coli form (MPN/100
5 <1000 <1000
ml) without disinfection
6 O &G, mg/l - -
7 Quality of Treated Effluent High High
8 Nutrient Removal potential High Low
9 Land Requirement
High Low
potential
10 Capital Cost Medium to High Medium
11 Power Requirement
Very Low High
Potential
12 O & M Cost/ year 4% of the total capital 15-18% of the total

expenditure capital expenditure
14 Operation and Maintenance
Operation and Maintenance are two activities which are very important to any project.
Operation refers to the functioning of a system, whereas maintenance refers to the regular
planned activities required to keep the system in run.
14.1 O&M for Interception and Diversion Sewers
Sewer maintenance functions are most often neglected and given attention only as
emergency arises. Adequate budgets are seldom provided for supervision, manpower and
equipment, unlike the case for maintenance of other utilities like electric cables, telephone
cables, gas and water rains. Such attitude towards sewer maintenance is found even in large
cities. Considering the health hazards that the public at large has to face, it is appropriate to
provide sufficient funds to Operation and Maintenance take care of men, material,
equipment and machinery required for efficient maintenance. All efforts should be made to
see that there is no failure in the diversion sewer system of a town; a serious health hazard
54
CSIR-NEERI
results when sewage backs up and gets stagnated at any location. Maintenance helps to
protect the capital investment and ensures an effective and economical expenditure in
operating and maintaining the sewerage facilities. It also helps to build up and maintain
cordial relations with the public, whose understanding and support are essential for the
success of the facility.
14.2 O&M for SBR based STP
The operation and maintenance for the Sequential Batch Reactor technology for treatment
of sewage are as follows
 One important aspect of SBR is continuous power supply. In case the power supply
fails, the DG sets are to be brought to line immediately, thereby ensuring continuous
operation of the reactor
 Since the heart of the SBR system are the controls, automatic valve and switches,
requires continuous monitoring and maintenance than any other equipment of the
plant. Failing of any of the control equipment shall result in affecting the plant
performance on large scale basis.
 Dissolved Oxygen, pH and alkalinity of the SBR reactors tanks are to be monitored
continuously by the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System.
Hence it is necessary to calibrate the SCADA system on regular basis.
 On daily basis, at least one cycle should be observed manually by the shift in
charge/operator to confirm normal operations of all processes of SBR. Filling,
Aeration, Settle, Decant and Sludge Return is considered as one complete cycle.
 Foaming is a common problem in any aerobic treatment. Effective management of
sludge wasting and spraying of fresh water in aeration tanks using jet spray nozzles
can control foaming issue. Also sudden huge foaming situations can be controlled
usage of chemicals.
 It is very important to maintain the prescribed Dissolved Oxygen levels in the reactor
(1.5 to 2 mg/L) to provide a satisfactory environment necessary for biological
degradation of organic loads.
55
CSIR-NEERI
14.3 O&M for Phytorid based STP
Unlike conventional sewage treatment plants, Phytorid requires very minimum operation
and maintenance. However for smooth running of the plant, operation and maintenance
schedule is to be followed as follows and the frequency of necessary actions under
operation and maintenance are shown in the following Table- 24.
 The electromechanical items are to be serviced as per its preventive maintenance
schedule. This will be a lighter task as the number of electromechanical items in the
plant will be very few in numbers.
 The plants in Phytorid bed should be partially harvested as per schedule and care
should be taken that the plants in Phytorid bed should never be uprooted.
 The top surface of Phytorid bed should always be clean. Any dry leaves, invasive
growth etc., should be cleared from the top surface.
 The outlet of treated water tanks should be checked on regular basis to avoid any
obstruction to the water flow.
Table 24 Annual Maintenance Schedule for Phytorid based STP

Sr.
Maintenance Task Frequency
No
01 Re-plantation (partially if needed based on inspection) Once in 6 Months
02 Harvesting of overgrown plants, roots and uprooting of unwanted
Once in 3 Months
weed growth/invasive species
03 Solids Cleaning in Phytorid Chambers Once in a Year
04 Cleaning of Settling chamber Once in a Year
05 Sludge Removal and Disposal Once in 3 Years
As per the
06 Electromechanical items Manufacturer
Schedule
07 Inspection of water levels Once in 6 months
Bio media augmentation (10% of the first time addition) First year Based on notable
08 it may need to be added more time for stabilization decrease in efficiency
for over a long time
56
CSIR-NEERI
15 Population Growth Projections
The population projection calculations for the current year 2019, base year 2022,
Intermediate year 2037 and the Ultimate year 2052 are carried out adopting the following
methods:
1. Incremental Increase Method
2. Geometric increase Method
3. Arithmetic Increase Method
15.1 Arithmetic Increase Method (as per CPHEEO Manual)
The Arithmetic increase method is suitable for large and old cities with considerable
development. If the method is adopted for small, average or comparatively new cities, it
provides a lower population estimate than the actual value. In this method, the average
increase in population per decade is calculated from the past census reports. This increase is
added to the present population to find out the population of the next decade. Thus, it is
assumed that the population is increasing at a constant rate.
Pn = P + n*C
Where,
Pn = Population Projection for nth year
n = Number of decades
C = Average increment
15.2 Incremental Increase Method (as per CPHEEO Manual)
The Incremental Increase method is the modification of arithmetical increase method and is
suitable for an average size town under normal condition where the growth rate is found to
be in increasing order. While adopting this method the increase in increment is considered
for calculating the future population. The incremental increase is determined for each
decade from the past population and the average value is added to the present population
along with the average rate of increase. Hence, population after nth decade is,
57
CSIR-NEERI
Pn = P+ n*X + {n (n+1)/2}. Y
Where,
X = Average increase
Y = Incremental increase
N= number of decades
15.3 Geometric Increase Method (as per CPHEEO Manual):
The Geometric Increase method is the percentage increase in population from decade to
decade is assumed to remain constant. Geometric mean increase is used to find out the
future increment in population. Since this method gives higher values and hence should be
applied for a new industrial town at the beginning of development for only few decades.
The population at the end of nth decade ‘Pn’ can be estimated as:
Pn = P (1+ IG/100) n
Where,
IG = geometric mean (%)
P = Present population
N = no. of decades.
15.4 Population Forecast Calculations
The capacity of the sewage treatment plant is designed to handle the sewage generated by
the city or town after 15 years (2037) from the base year (2022). The recommendation is as
per the "Guidelines for preparation of DPRs for works of Interception and Diversion of
Drains and Sewage Treatment Plants" published by NMCG, Ministry if Water Resources,
River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation, Government of India, New Delhi on August 2018.
For interception and diversion sewer lines, the year adopted is also 30 years from the base
year, i.e., 2052 as per the aforementioned guidelines. The historical population data of
Supaul town along with decadal growth rate is shown in Table- 25.
58
CSIR-NEERI
The population for the Supaul town is projected using Arithmetic Increase (Table- 26),
Incremental Increase (Table- 27) and Geometric Increase methods (Table 28). The mean of
all three methods is considered as the projected population for the ultimate year 2037. The
per capita water demand for the town is 135 lpcd as per the ULB data. Accordingly, the total
water demand and the quantity of sewage generated ward wise for Zones I, II & III & IV are
depicted in the following Table- 29, 30, 31 & 32. The projected population comparison of
town by different methods is summarized in the below Table- 33. The design years 2037 and
2052 is shown including a floating population of 5%. This is considered, since the town's
population and sewage generation rate is increased during regional festival days. The same
is considered for design purposes as well. Fig-11 and Fig-12 shows the bar chart comparison
and graphical comparison respectively of the projected population for future till 2052. Fig-
13 shows the bar chart comparison of population forecasted by all methods for the design
years along with average of all methods. The Fig- 14 shows the bar chart comparison
population projection for Zones I, II, III & IV till 2052.
Table 25 Historical Population Data of Supaul with Growth Rate
Year Population Growth

1961 17460
1971 22558 0.29
1981 30732 0.36
1991 40588 0.32
2001 54085 0.33
2011 65445 0.21
Table 26 Arithmetic Increase Method calculation of past decades for future population forecasting
ARITHMATIC INCREASE METHOD

Sr. No. Year Population Increment
1 1961 17460
2 1971 22558 5098
3 1981 30732 8174
4 1991 40588 9856
5 2001 54085 13497
6 2011 65445 11360
Average Increment 9597
59
CSIR-NEERI
Table 27 Incremental Increase Method calculation of past decades for future population
forecasting
INCREMENTAL INCREASE METHOD

Incremental
Sr. No. Year Population Increase(X)
Increase (Y)
1 1961 17460
2 1971 22558 5098
3 1981 30732 8174 3076
4 1991 40588 9856 1682
5 2001 54085 13497 3641
6 2011 65445 11360 -2137
Total 47985 6262
Average 9597 1566
Table 28 Geometric Increase Method calculation of past decades for future population forecasting
Geometric Increase Method

Geometric Increase
Sr. No. Year Population Increment
Rate of Growth
1 1961 17460
2 1971 22558 5098 0.29
3 1981 30732 8174 0.36
4 1991 40588 9856 0.32
5 2001 54085 13497 0.33
6 2011 65445 11360 0.21
Geometric mean (Ig) 0.30
% 29.85
60
CSIR-NEERI
Figure 11 Bar Chart Diagrams of Projected Populations

Figure 12 Graphical Representations of Projected Populations

Table 29 Ward Wise Projected Population, Water Demand and Sewage Quantity of Zone- I
Population Water Demand (MLD) Sewage Quantity (MLD)

Ward
No 2037 2052 2037 2052 2037 2052
2011 2019 2022 2037 2052 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052
(+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%)
8 1505 1748 1848 2431 2553 3196 3356 0.20 0.24 0.25 0.33 0.34 0.43 0.45 0.16 0.19 0.20 0.26 0.28 0.35 0.36
10 2368 2750 2907 3826 4017 5029 5280 0.32 0.37 0.39 0.52 0.54 0.68 0.71 0.26 0.30 0.31 0.41 0.43 0.54 0.57
25 2124 2467 2608 3431 3603 4510 4736 0.29 0.33 0.35 0.46 0.49 0.61 0.64 0.23 0.27 0.28 0.37 0.39 0.49 0.51
11 1949 2264 2393 3149 3306 4139 4346 0.26 0.31 0.32 0.43 0.45 0.56 0.59 0.21 0.24 0.26 0.34 0.36 0.45 0.47
9 2120 2462 2603 3425 3596 4502 4727 0.29 0.33 0.35 0.46 0.49 0.61 0.64 0.23 0.27 0.28 0.37 0.39 0.49 0.51
13 1984 2304 2436 3205 3366 4213 4424 0.27 0.31 0.33 0.43 0.45 0.57 0.60 0.21 0.25 0.26 0.35 0.36 0.46 0.48
17 2459 2856 3019 3973 4171 5222 5483 0.33 0.39 0.41 0.54 0.56 0.70 0.74 0.27 0.31 0.33 0.43 0.45 0.56 0.59
12 2275 2642 2793 3675 3859 4831 5073 0.31 0.36 0.38 0.50 0.52 0.65 0.68 0.25 0.29 0.30 0.40 0.42 0.52 0.55
23 2354 2734 2890 3803 3993 4999 5249 0.32 0.37 0.39 0.51 0.54 0.67 0.71 0.25 0.30 0.31 0.41 0.43 0.54 0.57
22 2054 2386 2522 3318 3484 4362 4580 0.28 0.32 0.34 0.45 0.47 0.59 0.62 0.22 0.26 0.27 0.36 0.38 0.47 0.49
20 2017 2343 2476 3259 3422 4283 4497 0.27 0.32 0.33 0.44 0.46 0.58 0.61 0.22 0.25 0.27 0.35 0.37 0.46 0.49
21 2223 2582 2729 3591 3771 4721 4957 0.30 0.35 0.37 0.48 0.51 0.64 0.67 0.24 0.28 0.29 0.39 0.41 0.51 0.54
18 3005 3490 3689 4855 5098 6381 6700 0.41 0.47 0.50 0.66 0.69 0.86 0.90 0.32 0.38 0.40 0.52 0.55 0.69 0.72
63
CSIR-NEERI

Ward
No 2037 2052 2037 2052 2037 2052
2011 2019 2022 2037 2052 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052
(+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%)
19 2652 3080 3256 4284 4499 5632 5913 0.36 0.42 0.44 0.58 0.61 0.76 0.80 0.29 0.33 0.35 0.46 0.49 0.61 0.64
24 2127 2470 2611 3436 3608 4517 4743 0.29 0.33 0.35 0.46 0.49 0.61 0.64 0.23 0.27 0.28 0.37 0.39 0.49 0.51
26
1631 1894 2002 2635 2767 3464 3637 0.22 0.26 0.27 0.36 0.37 0.47 0.49 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.28 0.30 0.37 0.39
(40%)
2
1175 1365 1443 1898 1993 2495 2620 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.26 0.27 0.34 0.35 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.21 0.22 0.27 0.28
(60%)
36022 41837 44224 58196 61106 76496 80321 4.9 5.6 6.0 7.9 8.2 10.3 10.8 3.9 4.5 4.8 6.3 6.6 8.3 8.7
64
CSIR-NEERI
Table 30 Ward Wise Projected Population, Water Demand and Sewage Quantity of Zone- II

W. No.
2037 2052 2037 2052 2037 2052
2011 2019 2022 2037 2052 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052
(+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%)
4 2935 3409 3603 4742 4979 6233 6544 0.40 0.46 0.49 0.64 0.67 0.84 0.88 0.32 0.37 0.39 0.51 0.54 0.67 0.71
6 2062 2395 2532 3331 3498 4379 4598 0.28 0.32 0.34 0.45 0.47 0.59 0.62 0.22 0.26 0.27 0.36 0.38 0.47 0.50
7 2150 2497 2640 3473 3647 4566 4794 0.29 0.34 0.36 0.47 0.49 0.62 0.65 0.23 0.27 0.29 0.38 0.39 0.49 0.52
26
2446 2841 3003 3952 4149 5194 5454 0.33 0.38 0.41 0.53 0.56 0.70 0.74 0.26 0.31 0.32 0.43 0.45 0.56 0.59
(60%)
27 1998 2321 2453 3228 3389 4243 4455 0.27 0.31 0.33 0.44 0.46 0.57 0.60 0.22 0.25 0.26 0.35 0.37 0.46 0.48
28 1224 1422 1503 1977 2076 2599 2729 0.17 0.19 0.20 0.27 0.28 0.35 0.37 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.21 0.22 0.28 0.29
1281
14884 15733 20703 21739 27214 28574 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.8 2.9 3.7 3.9 1.4 1.6 1.7 2.2 2.3 2.9 3.1
5
65
CSIR-NEERI
Table 31 Ward Wise Projected Population, Water Demand and Sewage Quantity of Zone- III

W. No.
2037 2052 2037 2052 2037 2052
2011 2019 2022 2037 2052 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052
(+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%)
2
784 911 963 1267 1330 1665 1748 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.22 0.24 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.18 0.19
(40%)
1 2802 3254 3440 4527 4753 5950 6248 0.38 0.44 0.46 0.61 0.64 0.80 0.84 0.30 0.35 0.37 0.49 0.51 0.64 0.67
15 2018 2344 2478 3260 3423 4285 4500 0.27 0.32 0.33 0.44 0.46 0.58 0.61 0.22 0.25 0.27 0.35 0.37 0.46 0.49
14 2516 2922 3089 4065 4268 5343 5610 0.34 0.39 0.42 0.55 0.58 0.72 0.76 0.27 0.32 0.33 0.44 0.46 0.58 0.61
16 2251 2614 2764 3637 3818 4780 5019 0.30 0.35 0.37 0.49 0.52 0.65 0.68 0.24 0.28 0.30 0.39 0.41 0.52 0.54
10371 12045 12733 16755 17593 22024 23125 1.4 1.6 1.7 2.3 2.4 3.0 3.1 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.8 1.9 2.4 2.5
66
CSIR-NEERI
Table 32 Ward Wise Projected Population, Water Demand and Sewage Quantity of Zone- IV

W.
No 2037 2052 2037 2052 2037 2052
2011 2019 2022 2037 2052 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052
(+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%) (+5%)
3 2090 2427 2566 3377 3545 4438 4660 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5
5 4147 4816 5091 6700 7035 8807 9247 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.2 0.4 0.5 0.55 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0
6237 7244 7657 10076 10580 13245 13907 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.8 1.9 0.7 0.78 0.83 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.5
67
CSIR-NEERI
Table 33 Population forecasting of Supaul Town by all methods
Arithmetical Incremental Geometric Average

Year Progression Increase Increase Projected
Method Method Method Population
2019
73123 74250 80655 76009
(Present Year)
2022
76002 77810 87230 80347
(Base Year)
2037
(15 years from base 90397 97724 129071 105731
year)
2037
(Including 5% floating 94917 102610 135524 111017
population)
2052
(30 years from base 104793 121160 190982 138978
year)
2052
(Including 5% floating 110032 127218 200531 145927
population)
Figure 13 Comparison of Population Projection by different methods

Figure 14 Zone Wise Population Forecasting
70
CSIR-NEERI
16 Design Years
It is expected that the proposed scheme would be commissioned by the year 2022 which
has been considered as the base Year for the project (three years from the present year
2019). The Design span various stages shall be as per the following Table- 34 showing the
projected population and sewage generated for the current, base, intermediate and the
design years.
Table 34 Design Years with projected population and sewage generation quantity
Sr. Sewage
Year Population
No (MLD)
2019
1 76009 8.2
(Current Year)
2022
2 80347 8.7
(Base Year)
2037
3 (15 years from base 105731 11.4
year)
2037
4 (including 5% floating 111017 12.0
population)
2052
5 (30 years from base 138978 15.0
year)
2052
6 (Including 5% floating 145927 15.8
population)
17 Identification of Drains
The town of Supaul is divided into four zones based on the network of its drains. The drains
carry the sewage of the wards and finally are discharged into River Gajna. The details of
zones, wards, number of drains and quantity of sewage are shown in Table- 35. The
drainage map of Supaul town is shown in the Fig- 15.
Table 35 Supaul- Zones and Drains
Quantity of
Zones Wards No of Drains Location
Sewage
8, 10, 25, 11, 9, 13,
I 17, 12, 23, 22, 20, 1 Near Chitragupt 6.6 MLD (2037)
21, 18, 19, 24, 26 Temple 8.7 MLD (2052)
(40%) & 2 (60%)
II 4, 6, 7, 26 (60%), Near Station 2.3 MLD (2037)
1
27, 28 Road 3.1 MLD (2052)
Opposite to
III 2 (40%), 1, 14, 15 1.9 MLD (2037)
1 Pipra Khurd
16 2.5 MLD (2052)
Road
IV Near Navodaya 1.1 MLD (2037)
3, 5 1 Vidyalaya 1.5 MLD (2052)
*For the year 2037 and 2052 Sewage generation quantity is for projected population including 5%
of floating population
72
CSIR-NEERI
Figure 15 Drain Map of Supaul

18 Discharge Measurements at Drains outfall
As explained under section-9, the drains carrying the sewage of the town are discharged
into low lying open lands, which results in formation pools and small ponds in various parts
of town. This condition is also confirmed by the team of BUIDCO and IIT- Roorkee
professionals. The report received is attached as Annexure 8. Due to this reason, the steady
flow of sewage in the drain is restricted. This condition makes it difficult for flow
measurements in drains. Hence, it is not possible to carry out actual flow measurements
activity at site. The aerial view of sewage discharged in low laying open lands and the
images of the site conditions showing stagnant sewage in low lying areas and is shown in
the following Fig 16, 17, 18, 19 & 20.
Due to these conditions, the sewage generation for the design years 2032(STP) and
2052(I&D sewers) is directly calculated based on the forecasted population and sewage
generation rate (80%) for future water consumption rate of 135 lpcd.
Figure 16 Aerial View of Sewage ponds formed due to overflow of drain-1 near Chitragupt Temple
Figure 17 Aerial View of Sewage ponds formed due to overflow of drain-2 near Station Road
Figure 18 Aerial View of Sewage ponds formed due to overflow of drain-3 near Pipra Khurd Road
75
CSIR-NEERI
Figure 19 Image of Overflow Sewage entered into low lying area- 1
Figure 20 Image of Overflow Sewage entered into low lying area- 2
76
CSIR-NEERI
19 Dry Weather Flow Water Quality
Samples of wastewater have been collected during weekdays and weekend from drains near
identified I&D and STP points. Samples were collected from total four points of Supaul region.
Wastewater Analysis results are tabulated in following table no. 36. The analysis of the
sample from all drain shows that the range of BOD is 87-116 mg/L, COD is 120-187 mg/L,
and suspended solids is 1670-2260 mg/L.
Table 36 Waste Water Sample Analysis Report
Monitoring Sites of Drains/ Inlet to STPs

Opp. Pipra Khurd
Parameters Nr. Chitragupta Near Railway road, Nr. Sahil Nr. Navoday
temple Station electronics and Vidyalaya
mobile shop
Latitude 26.107139 26.114969 26.117558 26.139683
Location
Longitude 86.60118 86.605317 86.575809 86.635129
pH 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5

Temperature (°C) 16-22 16-22 16-22 16-22
Colour Grey Grey Grey Grey
Odour Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable
Conductivity (µ/s) 1255 1410 1165 367
TSS 1785 1900 2260 1670
BOD, Total 87 116 98 105
COD, Total 120 187 153 135
Nitrogen, NO3 5.06 7.34 9.07 6.20
Phosphorus (T-P) 1.2 0.85 0.77 1.03
Total Coliform
369 *105 400 * 105 291 * 105 333 * 105
(MNP/100 ml)
Faecal Coliform
103 * 105 133* 105 152 * 105 179 * 105
(MNP/100 ml)
TDS 333 216 274 300
Chloride (mg/l) 126 77 105 97
Sulphates (mg/l) 38 29 35 41
77
CSIR-NEERI
20 Dry Weather Projections for Future
Presently, Supaul town does not have any established sewerage network. The houses of
Supaul have septic tanks and soak pits, into which the sewage is discharged. The water that
runs in the drains is mostly domestic effluent of daily house activities. However the
sewerage network for the town is expected to be implemented in the next few years time.
Hence, the future dry weather flow quantity is projected based on the upcoming sewerage
network scheme, projected population and water supply rate. The projected dry weather
flows in drains is as per the following Table- 37.
Table 37 Projected Average Dry Weather Flow in Drains
2037 2052
2019 2022 (Including (Including
2037 2052
Zone/ Year (Current (Base 5% of the 5% of
Year) Year) floating floating
population) population)
Drain in
4.5 MLD 4.8 MLD 6.3 MLD 6.6 MLD 8.3 MLD 8.7 MLD
Zone - 01
Drain in
Zone- 02
Drain in
Zone- 03
Drain in
Zone- 04
Total 8.21 MLD 8.68 MLD 11.42 MLD 11.99 MLD 15.01 MLD 15.76 MLD
78
CSIR-NEERI
21 Proposals
The Supaul town is divided into four zones depending on the flow directions of the drains. In
the earlier versions of the DPR, one centralized STP with 3 Interceptions & Diversions and 2
Intermediate Pumping Stations were provided. However, based on the comments and
suggestions by BUIDCO, SPMG and IIT-R (Third Party), the DPR is revised with De-Centralized
STPs and no pumping stations. As per the corrections received from BUIDCO, sewage from
zone I & II discharges to STP 1. Accordingly, proposed are four interceptions of drains near
to the outfall points followed by 4 diversion sewers leading to 3 STPs respectively.
The design year considered for STP capacity is based on the NMCG guidelines document as
2037, i.e., 15 years from the base year (2022). The capacity of STP is decided based on the
projection of population, water supply rate and sewage generation rate as shown in the
previous sections of this DPR.
21.1 Nallah Interception & Diversion Works
Summary details of Supaul town with zones, wards, forecasted population, future water
demand, estimated sewage generation quantity etc., are shown in Table- 38. The design
years 2037 and 2052 projected includes 5% of floating population. The interception points,
length of diversion sewers, GPS coordinates of interception points and details are shown in
Table- 39. The proposed I&D scheme of the Supaul city map is shown in Fig- 21.
Table 38 Summary Details of Supaul Town for Implementation I&D Scheme
Interception and Diversion
1 Town Supaul
2 District Supaul
Last Census Population
3 65445
( year 2011)
4 Year 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052
5 Forecast Population 65445 76009 80347 111017 145927
Net Water Demand
6 8.84 10.26 10.85 14.99 19.70
(MLD)
7 Net Sewage Generation 7.07 8.21 8.68 12.00 15.76
79
CSIR-NEERI

(MLD)
No of Service Zones for
8 interception and I, II & III & IV
diversion
Details of Zone- I
8, 10, 25, 11, 9, 13, 17, 12, 23, 22, 20, 21, 18, 19, 24,
Ward No. Covered
26 (40%) & 2 (60%)
Years 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052
9 Population to be Served
36,022 41837 44224 61106 80321
in Service Zone I
Water Demand (MLD)-
4.9 5.6 6.0 8.2 10.8
Service Zone I
Sewage Quantity (MLD)
3.9 4.5 4.8 6.6 8.7
in Service Zone I
10 Length of the sewer 1700 m
Length of treated water
11 line 680 m
Details of Zone- II
Ward No. Covered 4, 6, 7, 26 (60%), 27, 28
Years 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052
Population to be Served
12 12815 14884 15733 21739 28574
in Service Zone II
Water Demand(MLD)-
Service Zone II 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.9 3.9
Sewage Quantity(MLD)
1.4 1.6 1.7 2.3 3.1
in Service Zone II
Details of Zone- III
Ward No. Covered 1, 15, 14, 16 and 2 (40%)
Years 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052
15 Population to be Served
10371 12045 12733 17593 23125
in Service Zone III
Water Demand(MLD)-
1.4 1.6 1.7 2.4 3.1
Service Zone III
Sewage Quantity(MLD) 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.9 2.5
80
CSIR-NEERI

in Service Zone III
17 Length of treated water
100 m
line
18 Details of Zone- IV
Ward No. Covered 3&5
Years 2011 2019 2022 2037 2052
Population to be Served
6237 7244 7657 10580 13907
in Service Zone IV
19
Water Demand (MLD)-
0.8 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.9
Service Zone IV
Sewage Quantity(MLD)
0.7 0.78 0.83 1.1 1.5
in Service Zone IV
21 Length of treated water
120 m
line
22 STP Technology SBR and Phytorid
Rate of water supply per
23 135 lpcd
capita
3 20,000 population
20,000 to 50,000
2.5
24 Peak Factors Population
2.25 50,000 to 7,50,000
2 >7,50,000
25 Flow Type Gravity
26 Types of pipes NP2, NP3
27 M.O.C of pipe RCC
28 Bedding of Pipe Class A
81
CSIR-NEERI
Table 39 Details of Proposed Interception & Diversion Works
Projected sewage
Length of
flow through Flow Type
Latitude and Diversion
Sr. Zones Drains in 2052 in
Interception Points Wards Covered Longitude of Drain Sewer from
No covered (including 5% Diversion
Interception Point Interception
floating Sewer
to STP Site
population)
8, 10, 25, 11, 9, 13, 17, 12, 23,

1 Drain near Chitragupt Temple Zone- I 22, 20, 21, 18, 19, 24, 26 (40%) 8.7 MLD 26.105692 86.587048 1700 m Gravity
& 2 (60%)
2 Drain near Station Road Zone- II 4, 6, 7, 26 (60%), 27, 28 3.1 MLD 26.115297 86.603550 1777 m Gravity
Interception 3 A 3A to 3B = 277
Gravity
26.123164 86.596119 m
Drains near to Gajna River Interception 3 B

3 Zone- III 3B to 3C = 956
(Interception Points- 3A, 3B 1, 15, 14, 16 and 2 (40%) 2.5 MLD Gravity
26.121734 86.593840 m
& 3C)
Interception 3 C 3C to STP-3 =
Gravity
26.119059 86.584923 1000 m
4 Drain near Navodaya Zone-

3&5 1.5 MLD 26.139872 86.635820 37 m Gravity
Vidyalaya IV
Figure 21 Supaul City Map with proposed I& D schemes

21.1.1 Interception & Diversion Point - 1 (Near Chitragupt Temple)
a) The drain carries sewage generated by the wards 8, 10, 25, 11, 9, 13, 17, 12, 23, 22,
20, 21, 18, 19, 24, 40% of population of ward- 26 population and 60% of population
of ward- 2. The area comprising of these wards is termed as Zone- I in this DPR.
b) The Diversion sewer is designed to handle the flow of 8.7 MLD for the design year
2052 (including 5% floating population).
c) The majority of the population of Supaul resides under Zone-I only
d) Based on detailed site survey and considering all the required parameters it is
proposed that the location near to Chitragupt Temple is feasible to construct an
interception and diversion sewer. This proposed diversion sewer- I will lead to the
proposed STP 1, from which the final treated outlet shall be either used for irrigation
or be discharged in to the drain which meets the river.
e) The aerial view of the proposed I&D followed by STP is represented in the following
Fig- 22.
f) The image of the proposed site location for STP is shown in the following Fig- 23.
Figure 22 Aerial View of proposed I&D-1 and STP-1 near Chitragupt Temple
Figure 23 Proposed Site Location for STP near Station Road
21.1.2 Interception & Diversion Point - 2 (Near station road)
a) The drain carries sewage generated by the wards 4, 6, 7, 60% of the population of
ward- 26, 27, 28. The area comprising of these wards is termed as Zone- II in this
DPR.
c) This Zone-II is the second most populated zone in the Supaul town after Zone- I.
proposed that the location near to station road is feasible to construct an
interception and diversion sewer. This proposed diversion sewer will lead to the
proposed STP 1, from which the final treated outlet shall be either used for irrigation
Fig- 24.
85
CSIR-NEERI
Figure 24 Aerial View of proposed I&D-2 near Station Road and proposed STP 1
21.1.3 Interception & Diversion Point - 3 (Opposite to Pipra Khurd Road)
a) The drain carries sewage generated by the wards 1, 15, 14, 16 and 40% of the
population of ward- 2. The area comprising of these wards is termed as Zone- III in
this DPR.
c) This Zone-III is the second least populated zone in the Supaul town.
d) Based on detailed site survey, it is required to intercept at three points (3A, 3B and
3C). This proposed diversion sewer will lead to the proposed STP, from which the
final treated outlet shall be either used for irrigation or be discharged in to the drain
which meets the river.
Fig- 25.
86
CSIR-NEERI
Figure 25 Aerial View of proposed I&D- 3A, 3B & 3C and proposed STP- 2
21.1.4 Interception & Diversion Point - 4 (Near Navodaya Vidyalaya)
a) The drain carries sewage generated by the wards 3 & 5. The area comprising of these
wards is termed as Zone- IV in this DPR.
c) This Zone-IV is the least populated zone in the Supaul town.
proposed that the location near to Navodaya Vidyalaya is feasible to construct an
interception and diversion sewer. This proposed diversion sewer will lead to the
proposed STP, from which the final treated outlet shall be either used for irrigation
Fig- 26.
f) The image of the proposed site location for STP is shown in the following Fig- 27.
87
CSIR-NEERI
Figure 26 Aerial View of proposed I&D-4 and proposed STP- 3
Figure 27 Proposed Site Location for STP near Navodaya Vidyalaya
88
CSIR-NEERI
21.2 Sewage Treatment Plants
As per the corrections received from BUIDCO, four dedicated decentralized sewage
treatment plants are revised to three sewage treatment plant (sewage from both zone I & II
contributes to STP 1). Therefore, three decentralized sewage treatment plants are proposed
to treat the effluents generated in the four zones respectively as indicated in the earlier
sections of the DPR. The previous DPR submitted does not impel any specific technology to
implement for the treatment of sewage. These DPR includes design of sewage treatment
plant. The proposed STP capacities with selected technologies including all supporting
amenities details are as shown in the following Table- 40.
89
CSIR-NEERI
Table 40 Details of Proposed STPs
Proposed STP Site Land Length of treated

Proposed Zone Wards Proposed STP
Requirement water line from STP
STPs Capacity Technology
(m2) to Discharge Point
Latitude Longitude
8, 10, 25, 11, 9, 13, 17, 12,

I 23, 22, 20, 21, 18, 19, 24, 26 8.9 MLD
STP- 1 (40%) & 2 (60%) (6.6 MLD + 26.107139 86.601180 SBR 10028 m2 680 m
2.3 MLD )
II 4, 6, 7, 26 (60%), 27, 28
STP- 2 III 1, 15, 14, 16 and 2 (40%) 1.9 MLD 26.117558 86.575809 Phytorid 3170 m2 100 m
STP- 3 IV 3&5 1.1 MLD 26.139683 86.635129 Phytorid 1950 m2 120 m

22 Land Requirement
The SBR technology has been selected for implementation of 8.9 MLD STP and for the same
land required is 10,028 Sq.m whereas Phytorid technology is selected for implementation of
1.9 & 1.1 MLD sewage treatment plant and approximately 3170 & 1950 sq.m land area is
required respectively.
23 Operation and Maintenance
The operation and maintenance shall be done by the Urban Local Body or by some hired
third party contractor as per the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for interception and
diversion sewers and STPs.
24 Cost
The cost calculation for I&D and STP works is based on the SORs for Bihar state. The
executions final cost shall be based on open tender bidding and award of tender to the
Lowest of offers (L1).
25 Estimation and Costing
25.1 Cost Abstract Summary
Sr.
ITEMS ESTIMATED COST, (In Lakhs)
No.
Electrical and
Civil Works Mechanical Total
Works
I & D Sewers
1 Interception and Diversion – 1 & 2 214.68 214.68
2 Interception and Diversion – 3A,3B,3C 163.35 163.35
3 Interception and Diversion - 4 8.55 8.55
Sub Total A 386.57
STPs (Civil and Electromechanical Cost for SBR & Phytorid technology based Sewage
Treatment Plant)
SBR Technology Based STP 1
1 395.35 298.86 694.22
(8.9 MLD Capacity)
Phytorid Technology Based STP 2
2 290.08 59.98 350.06
(1.9 MLD Capacity)
Phytorid Technology Based STP 3
3 186.19 39.14 225.33
(1.1 MLD Capacity)
Sub Total B 1269.61
Total (A + B) 1656.17
CENTAGE
Cost of project Preparation@4% as
1 66.25
per NGRBA guidelines
Cost of project Supervision@4% as
2 66.25
per NGRBA guidelines
Sub Total C 132.49
Total (A+B+C) 1788.67
D Estimated cost for utility shifting@1% 17.89
E Public Awareness@2% 35.77
Environmental mitigation and
F 17.89
monitoring cost@1%
CAPITAL EXPENSES
1860.22
(A + B + C + D + E + F)
92
CSIR-NEERI
Sr.
ITEMS ESTIMATED COST, (In Lakhs)
No.
Electrical and
Civil Works Mechanical Total
Works
GST (18%) 334.84
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENSES
2195.05
(Including GST)
G Operational and maintenance Cost
O & M Cost for STP- 1 of capacity 8.9
1
MLD
0 - 5 Years 1002.99 1002.99
6 - 10 Years 1280.10 1280.10
11 - 15 Years 1633.77 1633.77
Sub-Total 3916.87
2
MLD
0 - 5 Years 131.53 131.53
6 - 10 Years 167.87 167.87
11 - 15 Years 214.24 214.24
Sub-Total 513.64
3
MLD
0 - 5 Years 93.85 93.85
6 - 10 Years 119.78 119.78
11 - 15 Years 152.87 152.87
Sub-Total 366.51
Total O&M Cost for 15 Years, G 4797.01
Total Project Cost (A+B+C+D+E+F+G) 6992.07
Total Project Cost
6992.07
(Including GST)
93
CSIR-NEERI
25.2 Design and Measurement for Interception and Diversion Sewers
25.2.1 I&D-1 (Design & Measurement)
25.2.1.1 Interceptor Pit
Wall
L B D F.B No of Pipe dia
Dimensions D+F.B Thickness
(m) (m) (m) (m) units (m)
(m)
Interceptor pit 3.7 2.0 0.95 0.55 1.5 1 0.28 0.45
Measurement SHEET - Interceptor Pit (I&D- 1)

L B D
Item of work No. Qty Say Unit
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
Surface dressing of the ground including removing
vegetation and inequalities not exceeding 15 cm deep and 5.86 4.16 24 24 m2
disposal of rubbish, lead upto 50 m and lift upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
Earth work in excavation over areas ( exceeding 30 cm in
depth. 1.5 m in width as well as 10 sqm on plan) including
disposal of excavated earth, lead upto 50 m and lift upto
1.5 m; disposed earth to be levelled and neatly dressed.
Lift 0 to1.5m
Interceptor pit 6 4 1.5 37 37 m3
Item No: 3
Extra for excavating trenches for pipes, cables etc. in all
kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth, but not exceeding 4.5
m. (Rate is over corresponding basic item for depth upto
1.5 meter)
Lift
1.5m to 3 m
Item No: 4
Supplying, filling, spreading & levelling stone boulders of
size range 5 cm to 20 cm, in recharge pit, in the required
thickness, for all leads & lifts, all complete as per direction
of Engineer-in-charge.
Item No: 5
Providing and laying in position cement concrete of
94
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
specified grade excluding the cost of centring and
shuttering-all work upto plinth level.
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
Interceptor pit 1 4.66 3.0 0.1 1.38 m3
1.4 m3
Item No: 6
Reinforced cement concrete work in wall (any thickness),
including attached pilasters, buttresses, plinth and string
courses, fillets, columns, pillars, piers, abutments, posts
and struts, etc. upto floor five level excluding cost of
centring, shuttering, finishing and reinforcement.
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
Top Slab/ Vertical walls/Bottom slab m3
Bottom slab 1 4.46 2.8 0.3 3.69 m3
Vertical wall 2 4.3 1.5 0.28 3.58 m3

2 2.0 1.5 0.28 1.68 m3
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 0.1 1.09
Total 10.04
Pipe 2 0.16 0.28 0.09
Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.15 0.28 0.42
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.1 0.12
Total 0.6 m3
Deduction
Pipe from wall 3.49
Sluice gate 1.26
Manhole from slab 0.97 m3
5.72 m3
Total Qty of RCC Total 9.41 m3
Item No: 7
15 mm cement plaster on rough side of single or half brick
wall of mix. (1:4 mix)
a) Internal Cement Plaster
Vertical wall 2 3.7 1.5 11 m2
2 2.0 1.5 6 m2
Bottom Slab/Top Slab 2 3.7 2.0 15 m2
95
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
32 m2
Deduction m2
Pipe 2 0.16 0.32 m2
Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.15 1.73 m2
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.54 m2
2.58 m2
Total 29 m2
b) External Cement Plaster
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 11
11
Deduction m2
Manhole 2 0.6 0.5 1
0.54
Total 10 m2
Total Qty of plaster 40 m2
Item No: 8
Providing and laying damp-proof Course 50 mm thick with
cement concrete 1:2:4 (1 cement: 2 coarse sand :4 graded
stone aggregate 20mm nominal size)
Internal Proofing
2 2.0 1.5 6 m2
32 m2
Deduction 3 m2
Total 29 m2
Item No: 9
Distempering with oil bound washable distemper of
approved brand and manufacture to give an even shade
External Proofing
Two or more coats on new work m2
2 2.6 1.5 8 m2
Sluice gate 1 1.5 1.2 2 m2
Total 19 m2
96
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 10
Reinforcement for R.C.C. work including straightening,
cutting, bending, placing in position and binding all
complete
Thermo-Mechanically Treated bars TMTC-500-12mm dia.
Total Qty of concrete 9.41 Cum
Tor bar at 110Kg/cum 1035 1.035 MT
Item No: 11
Providing and Laying non-pressure (NP2) RCC socket &
spigot pipes with rubber gasket joint including testing of
joints
R.C.C. pipes NP2 class 450 mm dia
Inlet Pipe 1 1
Item No: 12
RCC Precast valve chamber
M200
0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m, 1.30x1.30x1.45 1 1
Item No: 13
Rectangular shape 600x 450 mm precast R.C.C. manhole
2 2
cover with frame - L.D. - 25
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
Steel glazed door, window/ ventilator, all members viz.
1 1.5 1.2 20 (20mm) 270.83
F7D, F4B,K11 and K12B etc.
Item No: 15
C.I. Sluice valve (with caps) class I : 300 mm dia 1 1
97
CSIR-NEERI
25.2.1.2 Diversion Sewer (1700 m)
Overall Dia No. Dia.

Internal Overall
Outl Width/ Length Clear of Brick Depth of of
width Depth Area
et Outer (m) depth pipe Wall of Man Man
(m) (m)
dia (m) Thk filling hole hole
Pipe 1.36 1700.0 0.9 1.15 1.9 0.45 0.23 2312 1.15 57 1.2
Measurement Sheet - Diversion Sewer- 1 (1700m)

L B D
Item of work No Qty Say Unit
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
vegetation and inequalities not exceeding 15 cm
1701 2.36 4014.36 m2
deep and disposal of rubbish, lead upto 50 m and
lift upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
Earth work in excavation in foundation trenches or
drains (not exceeding 1.5 m in width or 10 sqm on
plan) including dressing of sides and ramming of
bottoms, lift upto 1.5 m. including getting out the
excavated soil and disposal of surplus excavated
soil as directed, within a lead of 50 m.
Lift 0 to1.5m
Drain 1701 2.56 1.5 6532 m3
Total 6532 m3
Item No: 3
Extra for excavating trenches for pipes, cables
etc.in all kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth, but
not exceeding 4.5 m.(Rate is over corresponding
basic item for depth upto 1.5 meter.)
Lift 1.5m to 3m 1701 2.560 0.4 1742 m3
Drain
Item No: 4
Supplying and Filling in plinth with local sand and
under floors including, watering, ramming
consolidating and dressing complete.
Filling
Drain 1624 1.10 1.15 2054.2 m3
76
1624 0.10 0.60 97.436
98
CSIR-NEERI
Measurement Sheet - Diversion Sewer- 1 (1700m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
2 1624 0.50 1.90 3085
Manhole 113 0.1 1.8 1.56 30.940

113 1.56 0.5 1.90 167.96
5436.09 m3
Item No: 5
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
Bedding Under manhole 57 1.56 1.56 0.15 20.69 20.69 m3
Bedding Under pipe 1612 1.10 0.15 265.91 265.91
Concrete cladding 1649 0.90 0.60 890.46
Deduction
Pipe 1649 0.2 262.13
628.33
Total PCC 914.93 m3
Item No :6
Half brick masonry with bricks of class designation
100A in foundations and plinth in :
Cement mortar 1:4 (1 cement: 4 coarse sand) 57 1.4 1.75 143.24 m2
Item No :7
Providing and laying non-pressure NP2 class (light
duty) R.C.C. pipes with collars jointed with stiff
mixture of cement mortar in the proportion of 1:2
(1 cement : 2 fine sand) including testing of joints
etc. complete :
R.C.C. pipes NP2 class 450 mm dia 1 1700.0 1700
Item No: 8
Providing and laying in position specified grade of
reinforced cement concrete excluding the cost of
centring, shuttering, finishing and reinforcement-
All work upto plinth level
1:1:5:3(1 cement: 1.5 coarse sand:3 graded stone
aggregate 20 mm nominal size) 57 1.1 0.05 3.20 m3
Inspection chamber/ RCC Cover
99
CSIR-NEERI
Wall
Dimensions D+F.B Thickness
(m)
Interceptor pit 3.7 2.0 0.8 0.7 1.5 1 0.28 0.30
Measurement Sheet - Interception Pit I&D-2

Item of work No. L(m) B(m) D(m) Qty Say Unit
Item No: 1
Surface dressing of the ground including
removing vegetation and inequalities not
5.86 4.16 24 24 m2
exceeding 15 cm deep and disposal of
rubbish, lead upto 50 m and lift upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
Earth work in excavation over areas (
exceeding 30 cm in depth. 1.5 m in width as
well es 10 sqm on plan) including disposal of
excavated earth , lead upto 50 m and lift
upto 1.5 m; disposed earth to be levelled
and neatly dressed.
Lift 0 to1.5m
Interceptor pit 6 4 1.5 37 m3
37 m3
Item No: 3
Extra for excavating trenches for pipes,
cables etc. in all kinds of soil exceeding 3 m
in depth, but not exceeding 4.5 m.(Rate is
over corresponding basic item for depth
upto 1.5 meter.)
Lift
1.5m to 3 m
Item No: 4
Supplying, filling, spreading & levelling stone
boulders of size range 5 cm to 20 cm, in
recharge pit, in the required thickness, for all
leads & lifts, all complete as per direction of
Engineer-in-charge.
100
CSIR-NEERI

Total 4 m3
Item No: 5
Providing and laying in position cement
concrete of specified grade excluding the
cost of centring and shuttering-all work upto
plinth level.
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
1.4 m3
Item No: 6
Reinforced cement concrete work in wall
(any thickness), including attached pilasters,
buttresses, plinth and string courses, fillets,
columns, pillars, piers, abutments, posts and
struts, etc. upt floor five level excluding cost
of centring, shuttering, finishing and
reinforcement.
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
Bottom slab 1 4.46 2.8 0.3 3.69 m3
Vertical wall 2 4.3 1.5 0.28 3.58 m3

2 2.0 1.5 0.28 1.68 m3
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 0.1 1.09
10.04
Pipe 2 0.07 0.28 0.04
Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.30 0.28 0.42
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.1 0.12
0.6
Deduction
Pipe from wall 3.54
Sluice gate 1.26
5.77
Item No: 7
15 mm cement plaster on rough side of
101
CSIR-NEERI

single or half brick wall of mix. (1:4 mix)
2 2.0 1.5 6 m2
m2
32 m2
Deduction m2
Pipe 2 0.07 0.14 m2
Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.30 1.95 m2
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.54 m2
2.63 m2
Total 29 m2
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 11
11
Deduction m2
Manhole 2 0.6 0.5 1
0.54
Total 10 m2
Item No: 8
Providing and laying damp-proof Course 50
mm thick with cement concrete
1:2:4(1cement:2:2 coarse sand :4 graded
Internal Proofing
2 2.0 1.5 6 m2
32 m2
Deduction 3 m2
Total 29 m2
Item No: 9
Distempering with oil bound washable
distemper of approved brand and
102
CSIR-NEERI

manufacture to give an even shade .
External Proofing
2 2.6 1.5 8 m2
Sluice gate 1 1.5 1.3 2
Total 19 m2
Item No: 10
Reinforcement for R.C.C. work including
straightening, cutting, bending, placing in
position and binding all complete
Thermo-Mechanically Treated bars TMTC-
500-12mm dia.
Item No: 11
Providing and laying non-pressure NP2 class
(light duty) R.C.C. pipes with collars jointed
with stiff mixture of cement mortar in the
proportion of 1:2 (1 cement : 2 fine sand)
including testing of joints etc. complete :
Inlet Pipe 1 1
Item No: 12
M200
0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m,
1 1
1.30x1.30x1.45
Item No: 13
Rectangular shape 600x 450 mm precast
2 2
R.C.C. manhole cover with frame - L.D. - 25
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
Steel glazed door, window/ ventilator, all
1 1.5 1.3 20 (20mm) 306.15
members viz. F7D, F4B,K11 and K12B etc.
Item No: 15
C.I. sluice valve (with caps) class I : 300 mm
1 1
dia
103
CSIR-NEERI
No. Dia.
Overall Internal Overall Dia of Brick Depth
Length Clear of of
Outlet Width/Out width Depth pipe Wall Area of
(m) depth Man Man
Pipe er dia (m) (m) (m) Thk filling
hole hole
1.36 189 0.9 1.3 1.9 0.30 0.23 257 1.3 6 1.2
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Diversion Sewer- 2 (1777m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
1778 2.36 4196 m2
lift upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
bottoms, lift upto 1.5 m . including getting out the
Lift 0 to1.5m
Drain 1778 2.56 1.5 6828 m3
Total 6828 m3
Item No: 3
etc.in all kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth , but
Lift 1.5m to 3m 1778 2.560 0.4 1821 m3
Drain
Item No: 4
Filling
Drain 1697 1.10 1.30 2427 m3
1697 0.10 0.60 101
104
CSIR-NEERI
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Diversion Sewer- 2 (1777m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
2 1697 0.50 1.90 3225
Manhole 118 0.1 1.8 1.56 32.341
118 1.56 0.5 1.90 175.56
5962.24 m3
Item No: 5
Providing and laying in position cement concrete
of specified grade excluding the cost of centring
and shuttering-all work upto plinth level.
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
Deduction
Pipe 1724 0.1 121.78
576.32
Total PCC 875.90 m3
Item No :6
Item No :7
etc. complete :
Item No: 8
105
CSIR-NEERI
25.2.2.3 Treated Water Line (680 m)
Pipe Overall
Overall L Internal Clear Dia of
(Manhole/Inspection Depth Area
Width (m) width (m) depth pipe (m)
Chamber provide at (m)
30m interval) 1.36 680.0 0.9 0.45 1.2 0.45 925
Measurement Sheet:- Treated water line- 680 m

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
681.0 2.360 1607 m2
deep and disposal of rubbish, lead upto 50 m and lift
upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
excavated soil and disposal of surplus excavated soil
as directed, within a lead of 50 m.
Lift 0 to1.5m
Drain 681 2.56 1.5 2615 m3
Total 2615 m3
Item No: 3
Extra for excavating trenches for pipes, cables etc.in
all kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth , but not
exceeding 4.5 m.(Rate is over corresponding basic
item for depth upto 1.5 meter.)
Lift 1.5m to 3m 681 2.560 -0.3 -523 m3
Drain
Item No: 4
Filling
Drain 650 1.10 0.45 321.8 m3
650 0.10 0.60 39.01 m3
2 650 0.50 1.20 780.2 m3
106
CSIR-NEERI
Measurement Sheet:- Treated water line- 680 m

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Manhole 45 0.1 1.1 0.45 2.142 m3
45 1.36 0.5 1.20 36.99 m3
1180.1 m3
Item No: 5
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
Bedding Under pipe 645 1.10 0.15 106.3 106.37 m3
Concrete cladding 660 0.90 0.60 356.1 m3
Deduction
Pipe 660 0.2 104.8 m3
251.33 m3
Total PCC 365.97 m3
Item No :6
Item No :7
mixture of cement mortar in the proportion of 1:2 (1
cement : 2 fine sand) including testing of joints etc.
complete :
Item No: 8
centring, shuttering, finishing and reinforcement-All
work upto plinth level
107
CSIR-NEERI
Wall
Interceptor L B D F.B. D+F.B No. of Pipe
Thickness
pit (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) tanks dia.(m)
(m)
(3A)
3.7 2.0 0.8 0.7 1.5 1 0.28 0.3
Measurement Sheet - Interception Pit 3A

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
Item No: 2
disposal of excavated earth , lead upto 50 m and lift upto
Lift 0 to1.5m
37 m3
Item No: 3
1.5 meter).
Lift
1.5m to 3 m
Item No: 4
Total 4 m3
Item No: 5
108
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
1.4 m3
Item No: 6
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
Bottom slab 1 4.46 2.8 0.3 3.69 m3
Vertical wall 2 4.3 1.5 0.28 3.58 m3

2 2.0 1.5 0.28 1.68 m3
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 0.1 1.09
10.04
Pipe 2 0.07 0.28 0.04

Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.30 0.28 0.42
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.1 0.12
0.6
Deduction
Pipe from wall 3.54
Sluice gate 1.26
5.77
Item No: 7
2 2.0 1.5 6 m2
109
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
m2
32 m2
Deduction m2
Pipe 2 0.07 0.14 m2
Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.30 1.95 m2
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.54 m2
2.63 m2
Total 29 m2
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 11
11
Deduction m2
Manhole 2 0.6 0.5 1
0.54
Total 10 m2
Item No: 8
cement concrete 1:2:4 (1cement:2:2 coarse sand :4
graded stone aggregate 20mm nominal size)
Internal Proofing
2 2.0 1.5 6 m2
32 m2
Deduction 3 m2
Total 29 m2
Item No: 9
approved brand and manufacture to give an even shade.
External Proofing
2 2.6 1.5 8 m2
110
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
m2
Total 19 m2
Item No: 10
complete
Item No: 11
Providing and laying non-pressure NP2 class (light duty)
R.C.C. pipes with collars jointed with stiff mixture of
cement mortar in the proportion of 1:2
(1 cement : 2 fine sand) including testing of joints etc.
complete :
Inlet Pipe 1 1
Item No: 12
M200
0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m, 1.30x1.30x1.45 1 1
Item No: 13
2 2
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
1 1.5 1.3 20 (20mm) 306.15
Item No: 15
C.I. sluice valve (with caps) class I : 300 mm dia 1 1
111
CSIR-NEERI
Wall Pipe
Interceptor D+F.B Beds
L (m) B (m) D (m) F.B (m) Thickness dia.
pit (m) (m)
(m) (m)
(3B)
3.7 2.0 0.8 1.2 2.0 1 0.28 0.3
Measurement Sheet - Interception Pit I&D-3B

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
5.86 4.16 24 24 m2
lift upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
Earth work in excavation over areas ( exceeding 30
cm in depth. 1.5 m in width as well as 10 sqm on
plan) including disposal of excavated earth , lead
upto 50 m and lift upto 1.5 m; disposed earth
to be levelled and neatly dressed.
Lift 0 to1.5m
37 m3
Item No: 3
Extra for excavating trenches for pipes, cables etc.
in all kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth , but not
Lift
1.5m to 3 m
Item No: 4
boulders of size range 5 cm to 20 cm, in recharge
pit, in the required thickness, for all leads & lifts, all
complete as per direction of Engineer-in-charge.
Total 4 m3
Item No: 5
112
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
1.4 m3
Item No: 6
Reinforced cement concrete work in wall (any
thickness), including attached pilasters, buttresses,
plinth and string courses, fillets,
columns, pillars, piers, abutments, posts and struts,
etc. upto floor five level excluding cost of centring,
shuttering, finishing and reinforcement.
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
Bottom slab 1 4.46 2.8 0.3 3.69 m3
Vertical wall 2 4.3 2.0 0.28 4.77 m3

2 2.0 2.0 0.28 2.24 m3
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 0.1 1.09
11.79
Pipe 2 0.07 0.28 0.04

Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.80 0.28 0.42
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.1 0.12
0.6
Deduction
Pipe from wall 4.73
Sluice gate 1.82
7.52
Item No: 7
15 mm cement plaster on rough side of single or
half brick wall of mix. (1:4 mix)
Vertical wall 2 3.7 2 15 m2
2 2.0 2 8 m2
113
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
m2
38 m2
Deduction m2
Pipe 2 0.07 0.14 m2
Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.80 2.70 m2
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.54 m2
3.38 m2
Total 34 m2
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 11
11
Deduction m2
Manhole 2 0.6 0.5 1
0.54
Total 10 m2
Item No: 8
Providing and laying damp-proof Course 50 mm
thick with cement concrete 1:2:4(1cement:2:2
coarse sand :4 graded stone aggregate 20mm
nominal size)
Internal Proofing
2 2.0 2.0 8 m2
38 m2
Deduction 3 m2
Total 34 m2
Item No: 9
Distempering with oil bound washable distemper
of approved brand and manufacture to give an
even shade.
External Proofing
Vertical wall 2 4.3 2 17 m2
114
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
2 2.6 2 10 m2
Total 25 m2
Item No: 10
straightening, cutting, bending, placing in position
and binding all complete
Thermo-Mechanically Treated bars TMTC-500-
12mm dia.
Item No: 11
etc. complete :
Inlet Pipe 1 1
Item No: 12
M200
0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m, 1.30x1.30x1.45 1 1
Item No: 13
Rectangular shape 600x 450 mm precast R.C.C.
2 2
manhole cover with frame - L.D. - 25
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
Steel glazed door, window/ ventilator, all members
1 1.5 1.8 20 (20mm) 423.9
viz. F7D, F4B,K11 and K12B etc.
Item No: 15
115
CSIR-NEERI
Wall Pipe
Interceptor L B D F.B D+F.B Beds
Thickness dia.
pit (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
(m) (m)
(3C)
3.7 2.0 0.8 1.4 2.2 1 0.28 0.3
Measurement Sheet - Interception Pit I&D- 3C

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
Item No: 2
depth. 1.5 m in width as well es 10 sqm on plan) including
Lift 0 to1.5m
37 m3
Item No: 3
Extra for excavating trenches for pipes, cables etc.in all
m.(Rate is over corresponding basic item for depth upto
1.5 meter.)
Lift
1.5m to 3 m
Item No: 4
Total 4 m3
Item No: 5
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
116
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
1.4 m3
Item No: 6
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
Bottom slab 1 4.46 2.8 0.3 3.69 m3
Vertical wall 2 4.3 2.2 0.28 5.25 m3

2 2.0 2.2 0.28 2.46 m3
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 0.1 1.09
12.50
Pipe 2 0.07 0.28 0.04

Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.80 0.28 0.42
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.1 0.12
0.6
Deduction
Pipe from wall 5.21
Sluice gate 2.04
8.22
Item No: 7
2 2.0 2.2 9 m2
m2
40 m2
117
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Deduction m2
Pipe 2 0.07 0.14 m2
Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.80 2.70 m2
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.54 m2
3.38 m2
Total 36 m2
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 11
11
Deduction m2
Manhole 2 0.6 0.5 1
0.54
Total 10 m2
Item No: 8
cement concrete 1:2:4(1cement:2:2 coarse sand :4 graded
Internal Proofing
2 2.0 2.2 9 m2
40 m2
Deduction 3 m2
Total 36 m2
Item No: 9
External Proofing
2 2.6 2.2 11 m2
m2
Total 27 m2
118
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 10
complete
Item No: 11
cement mortar in the proportion of 1:2(1 cement : 2 fine
sand) including testing of joints etc. complete :
Inlet Pipe 1 1
Item No: 12
M200
0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m, 1.30x1.30x1.45 1 1
Item No: 13
2 2
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
Steel glazed door, window/ ventilator, all members viz. (20
1 1.5 1.8 20 423.9
F7D, F4B,K11 and K12B etc. mm)
Item No: 15
C.I.SLUICE valve (with caps) class I : 300 mm dia 1 1
119
CSIR-NEERI
25.2.3.2 Diversion Sewer (3A to 3B + 3B to 3C + 3C to STP= 2233 m)
Overall
Internal Clear Overall Dia of Wall Rcc cover Depth of Dia. of
Width/o L No. of
width depth Depth pipe Thickness thickness filling Manhole
uter dia (m) Manhole
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
(m)
1.36 277 0.9 1.3 1.9 0.3 0.23 0.1 1.3 9 1.2
Manhole/Inspection Chamber provide at 30m
30
interval
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Diversion Sewer- 3A-3B (277m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
278 2.36 656 m2
lift upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
Lift 0 to1.5m
Drain 278 2.56 1.5 1068 m3
Total 1068 m3
Item No: 3
in all kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth, but not
Lift 1.5m to 3m 278 2.56 0.4 285 m3
Drain
Item No: 4
Filling
Drain 265 1.10 1.30 380 m3
265 0.10 0.60 15.9
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Diversion Sewer- 3A-3B (277m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
2 265 0.50 1.90 505
Manhole 18 0.1 1.8 1.56 5.041
18 1.56 0.5 1.90 28
933 m3
Item No: 5
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
Concrete cladding 269 0.90 0.45 109
Deduction
Pipe 269 0.1 19
89.8
Total PCC 137 m3
Item No :6
100A in foundations and plinth in
Item No :7
etc. complete :
Item No: 8
Inspection chamber/ Rcc Cover
121
CSIR-NEERI
Diversion Sewer - (3B to 3C) 956 m
Overall Internal Clear Overall Dia of Wall Rcc cover Depth of Dia. of
L No. of
Width/outer width depth Depth pipe Thickness thickness filling Manhole
(m) Manhole
dia (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1.36 956.0 0.9 1.8 2.4 0.30 0.23 0.1 1.8 32 1.2
30
interval
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Diversion Sewer- 3B-3C (956m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
957 2.360 2258.52 m2
exceeding 15 cm deep and disposal of rubbish,
lead upto 50 m and lift upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
Earth work in excavation in foundation trenches
or drains (not exceeding 1.5 m in width or 10 sqm
on plan) including dressing of sides and ramming
of bottoms, lift upto 1.5 m . including getting out
the excavated soil and disposal of surplus
excavated soil as directed, within a lead of 50 m.
Lift 0 to1.5m
Drain 957 2.56 1.5 3675 m3
Total 3675 m3
Item No: 3
etc.in all kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth, but
not exceeding 4.5 m. (Rate is over corresponding
Lift 1.5m to 3m 957 2.560 0.9 2205 m3
Drain
Item No: 4
Filling
Drain 914 1.10 1.80 1809.0 m3
914 0.10 0.60 54.820
122
CSIR-NEERI
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Diversion Sewer- 3B-3C (956m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
2 914 0.50 2.40 2192.7
Manhole 64 0.1 2.3 1.56 22.370
64 1.56 0.5 2.40 119.30
4198.34 m3
Item No: 5
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
Deduction
Pipe 927 0.1 65.52
310.05
Total PCC 471.22 m3
Item No :6
Half brick masonry with bricks of class
designation 100A in foundations and plinth in :
Item No :7
mixture of cement mortar in the proportion of
1:2 (1 cement : 2 fine sand) including testing of
joints etc. complete :
R.C.C. pipes NP2 class 300 mm dia 1 956 956
Item No: 8
123
CSIR-NEERI
Diversion Sewer (3C to STP) 1000m
Overall Internal Clear Overall Dia of Wall Rcc cover Depth of Dia. of
L No. of
Width/outer width depth Depth pipe Thickness thickness filling Manhole
(m) Manhole
dia (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1.36 1000 0.9 2 2.6 0.30 0.23 0.1 2.0 33 1.2
30
interval
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Diversion Sewer- 3C-STP2 (1000m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
1001.0 2.360 2362 m2
Item No: 2
or drains(not exceeding 1.5 m in width or 10
sqm on plan) including dressing of sides and
ramming of bottoms, lift upto 1.5 m . including
getting out the excavated soil and disposal of
surplus excavated soil as directed, within a lead
of 50 m.
Lift 0 to1.5m
Drain 1001 2.56 1.5 3844 m3
Total 3844 m3
Item No: 3
etc.in all kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth,
but not exceeding 4.5 m.(Rate is over
corresponding basic item for depth upto 1.5
meter.)
Lift 1.5m to 3m 1001 2.560 1.1 2819 m3
Drain
Item No: 4
Supplying and Filling in plinth with local sand
and under floors including, watering, ramming
Filling
Drain 956 1.10 1.30 1366.6 m3
124
CSIR-NEERI
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Diversion Sewer- 3C-STP2 (1000m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
956 0.10 0.60 57.340
2 956 0.50 2.60 2484.7
Manhole 67 0.1 2.5 1.56 25.480
67 1.56 0.5 2.60 135.20
4069.3 m3
Item No: 5
concrete of specified grade excluding the cost
of centring and shuttering-all work upto plinth
level.
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
Deduction
Pipe 970 0.1 68.53
935.42
Total PCC 1104.0 m3
Item No :6
Item No :7
Providing and laying non-pressure NP2 class
(light duty) R.C.C. pipes with collars jointed with
stiff mixture of cement mortar in the proportion
of 1:2 (1 cement : 2 fine sand) including testing
of joints etc. complete :
R.C.C. pipes NP2 class 300 mm dia 1 1000 1000
Item No: 8
Providing and laying in position specified grade
of reinforced cement concrete excluding the
cost of centring, shuttering, finishing and
reinforcement-All work upto plinth level
1:1:5:3(1 cement: 1.5 coarse sand:3 graded
stone aggregate 20 mm nominal size) 33 1.1 0.10 3.77 m3
125
CSIR-NEERI
Overall
Internal Clear Overall Dia of Wall Rcc cover Depth of Dia. of
Width/ L No. of
width depth Depth pipe Thickness thickness filling Manhole
outer (m) Manhole
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
dia (m)
1.36 100 0.9 0.5 1.1 0.30 0.23 0.1 0.5 3 1.2
Manhole/Inspection Chamber provide at
30
30m interval
Measurement Sheet - Treated Water Line (100m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
vegetation and inequalities not exceeding 15 cm deep and 101.0 2.36 238.36 m2
Item No: 2
drains(not exceeding 1.5 m in width or 10 sqm on plan)
including dressing of sides and ramming of bottoms, lift
upto 1.5 m . including getting out the excavated soil and
disposal of surplus excavated soil as directed, within a lead
of 50 m.
Lift 0 to1.5m
Drain 101 2.56 1.5 388 m3
Total 388 m3
Item No: 3
kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth, but not exceeding
4.5m.(Rate is over corresponding basic item for depth upto
1.5 meter.)
Lift 1.5m to 3m 101 2.56 -0.4 -103 m3
Drain
Item No: 4
Supplying and Filling in plinth with local sand and under
floors including, watering, ramming consolidating and
dressing complete.
Filling
Drain 96 1.10 0.50 53.057 m3
96 0.10 0.60 5.788
2 96 0.50 1.10 106.11
126
CSIR-NEERI
Measurement Sheet - Treated Water Line (100m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Manhole 7 0.1 1.0 0.50 0.317
7 1.36 0.5 1.10 4.987
170.26 m3
Item No: 5
specified grade exluding the cost of centring and
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
Deduction
Pipe 97 0.1 6.85
32.43
Total PCC 49.29 m3
Item No :6
Half brick masonry with bricks of class designation 100A in
foundations and plinth in
Item No :7
cement mortar in the proportion of 1:2 (1 cement : 2 fine
Item No: 8
reinforced cement concrete excluding the cost of centring,
shuttering, finishing and reinforcement-All work upto
plinth level
127
CSIR-NEERI
Wall
Dimensions D + F.B Thickness
(m)
Interceptor pit 3.7 2.0 0.8 0.75 1.5 1 0.28 0.30

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
5.86 4.16 24 24 m2
lift upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
upto 50 m and lift upto 1.5 m; disposed earth to be
levelled and neatly dressed.
Lift 0 to1.5m
37 m3
Item No: 3
in all kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth, but not
Lift
1.5m to 3 m
Item No: 4
Total 4 m3
Item No: 5
128
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
1.4 m3
Item No: 6
etc. upto floor five level excluding cost of centring,
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
Bottom slab 1 4.46 2.8 0.3 3.69 m3
Vertical wall 2 4.3 1.6 0.28 3.70 m3

2 2.0 1.6 0.28 1.74 m3
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 0.1 1.09 m3
10.22 m3
Pipe 2 0.07 0.28 0.04 m3
Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.35 0.28 0.42 m3
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.1 0.12 m3
0.6 m3
Deduction
Pipe from wall 3.66 m3
Sluice gate 1.32 m3
5.94 m3
Item No: 7
129
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
2 2.0 1.55 6 m2
m2
32 m2
Deduction m2
Pipe 2 0.07 0.14 m2
Sluice gate 1 1.50 1.35 2.03 m2
Manhole 2 0.6 0.45 0.54 m2
2.71 m2
Total 30 m2
Top Slab 1 4.26 2.6 11 m2
11 m2
Deduction
Manhole 2 0.6 0.5 1 m2
0.54 m2
Total 10 m2
Item No: 8
thick with cement concrete 1:2:4 (1cement:2:2
nominal size)
Internal Proofing
2 2.0 1.6 6 m2
32 m2
Deduction 3 m2
Total 30 m2
Item No: 9
Distempering with oil bound washable distemper
of approved brand and manufacture to give an
even shade.
External Proofing
130
CSIR-NEERI

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
2 2.6 1.55 8 m2
Sluice gate 1 1.5 1.4 2 m2
Total 19 m2
Item No: 10
12mm dia.
Item No: 11
1:2(1 cement : 2 fine sand) including testing of
Inlet Pipe 1 1
Item No: 12
M200
0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m, 1.30x1.30x1.45 1 1
Item No: 13
2 2
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
Steel glazed door, window/ ventilator, all members (20m 317.9
1 1.5 1.4 20
viz. F7D, F4B,K11 and K12B etc. m) 2
Item No: 15
131
CSIR-NEERI
25.2.4.2 Diversion Sewer-4 (37 m)
Overall Dia No. Dia.

Internal Overall
Width/ Length Clear of Brick Depth of of
Outlet width Depth Area
Outer (m) depth pipe Wall of Man Man
Pipe (m) (m)
dia (m) Thk filling hole hole
1.36 37 0.9 1.35 1.9 0.25 0.23 50 1.35 1 1.2
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Diversion Sewer 4 (37m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
vegetation and inequalities not exceeding 15 cm deep
38.0 2.360 89.68 m2
and disposal of rubbish, lead upto 50 m and lift upto
1.5 m
Item No: 2
Lift 0 to1.5m
Drain 38 2.56 1.5 146 m3
Total 146 m3
Item No: 3
Extra for excavating trenches for pipes, cables etc. in
all kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth, but not
Lift 1.5m to 3m 38 2.560 0.4 39 m3
Drain
Item No: 4
Filling
Drain 36 1.10 1.35 53.9 m3
36 0.10 0.60 2.17 m3
2 36 0.50 1.90 69.0 m3
132
CSIR-NEERI
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Diversion Sewer 4 (37m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Manhole 2 0.1 1.8 1.56 0.67 m3
2 1.56 0.5 1.90 3.65 m3
129.46 m3
Item No: 5
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
Deduction
Pipe 36 0.0 1.76 m3
11.16 m3
Total PCC 17.40 m3
Item No :6
Item No :7
complete :
Item No: 8
133
CSIR-NEERI
Pipe Internal Overall

Overall Dia of pipe
(Manhole/Inspection L width Clear depth Depth Area
Width (m)
Chamber provide at (m) (m)
30m interval) 1.36 120 0.9 0.55 1.1 0.30 163
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Treated Water Line (120m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Item No: 1
121.0 2.360 285.56 m2
deep and disposal of rubbish, lead upto 50 m and lift
upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
Lift 0 to1.5m
Drain 121 2.56 1.5 465 m3
Total 465 m3
Item No: 3
Extra for excavating trenches for pipes, cables etc. in
Lift 1.5m to 3m 121 2.560 -0.4 -124 m3
Drain
Item No: 4
Filling
Drain 116 1.10 0.55 69.914 m3
116 0.10 0.60 6.934 m3
2 116 0.50 1.10 127.1 m3
134
CSIR-NEERI
MEASUREMENT SHEET - Treated Water Line (120m)

L B D
(m) (m) (m)
Manhole 8 0.1 1.0 0.55 0.418 m3
8 1.36 0.5 1.10 5.984 m3
210.37 m3
Item No: 5
PCC M 25 -1:3:6
Deduction
Pipe 116 0.1 8.22 m3
33.68 m3
Total PCC 53.91 m3
Item No :6
Item No :7
complete :
Item No: 8
135
CSIR-NEERI
25.3 Bill of Quantities for Interception and Diversion Sewers
25.3.1 I&D-1 (BOQ)
BOQ: Interceptor Pit (I&D 1)

Rate Per Unit of Amount
Qty Description of item
Unit (RS) Material (Rs)
Item No: 1
Surface dressing of the ground including removing vegetation
24 and inequalities not exceeding 15 cm deep and disposal of 11.27 m2 275
Ref- Bihar SOR 18, Code .No-2.29/2.29.1,Pg-75
Item No: 2
disposal of excavated earth , lead upto 50 m and lift upto 1.5
m; disposed earth to be levelled and neatly dressed.
37 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 m3 11,687
Item No: 3
Extra for excavating trenches for pipes, cables etc. in all kinds
of soil exceeding 3 m in depth, but not exceeding 4.5 m. (Rate
is over corresponding basic item for depth upto 1.5 meter.
18 Lift from 1.5 to 3 m 316.5 m3 5,787
Ref- Bihar SOR 18, Code .No-2.12,Pg-73
Item No: 4
Supplying, filling, spreading & levelling stone boulders of size
range 5 cm to 20 cm, in recharge pit, in the required thickness,
4 959 m3 3,682
for all leads & lifts, all complete as per direction of Engineer-
in-charge.
Item No: 5
Providing and laying in position cement concrete of specified
grade excluding the cost of centring and shuttering-all work
upto plinth level.
1.4 PCC M 25 -1:3:6 4408.7 m3 6,081
Item No: 6
136
CSIR-NEERI

courses, fillets, columns, pillars, piers, abutments, posts and
struts, etc. upto floor five level excluding cost of centring,
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
9.41 Total Qty of RCC 5723.3 m3 53,872
Item No: 7
40 Total Qty of plaster 161.9 m2 6425
Item No: 8
29 cement concrete 1:2:4(1cement:2:2 coarse sand :4 graded 245.5 m2 7,197
Item No: 9
Distempering with oil bound washable distemper of approved
19 46.50 m2 871
brand and manufacture to give an even shade.
Ref- Bihar SOR 18, Code .No-13.77/13.77A.1,Pg-151
Item No: 10
Reinforcement for R.C.C. work including straightening, cutting,
bending, placing in position and binding all complete
1035 Thermo-Mechanically Treated bars TMTC-500-12mm dia. 75.2 Kg 77,863
Ref- Bihar SOR 16, Code .No-5.22/5.22.7C, Pg-86
Item No: 11
Providing and laying non-pressure NP2 class (light duty) R.C.C.
pipes with collars jointed with stiff mixture of cement mortar
in the proportion of 1:2 (1 cement : 2 fine sand) including
testing of joints etc. complete
1 R.C.C. pipes NP2 class 450 mm dia 729.3 meter 729
Ref- Bihar SOR 18, Code .No-19.6,19.6.5,Pg-242
Item No: 12
M200
1 0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m, 1.30x1.30x1.45 5,000 Each 5000
137
CSIR-NEERI

Market Rate
Item No: 13
Rectangular shape 600x 450 mm precast R.C.C. manhole cover
2 651.51 Each 1303.02
with frame - L.D. - 25
Ref- Bihar SOR 18, Code .No-7130,Pg-37
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
270.82 Steel glazed door, window/ ventilator, all members viz. F7D,
44.67 Kg
5 F4B,K11 and K12B etc.
Adding Casting charges (50%) 18147
Item No: 15
1 C.I. sluice valve (with caps) class I : 300 mm dia 14426 Each 14426
Sub-total (A) 2,13,345
Add for Structural design and Detailed drawing preparation
1.50% 3,200
(1.5% of B)
Sub-total (C) 2,16,545
Actual-cost (D)= Revised basic cost (C)- 4% of work cost 2,07,883
138
CSIR-NEERI
BOQ – Diversion Sewer (1700m)

Qty Description of item Rate Per Amount
Item No: 1
4014.36 11.27 Sqm 45241.8
Ref- Bihar SoR 18, Code .No-2.29/2.29.1,Pg-75
Item No: 2
or drains (not exceeding 1.5 m in width or 10 sqm
on plan) including dressing of sides and ramming
of bottoms, lift upto 1.5 m . including getting out
the excavated soil and disposal of surplus
excavated soil as directed, within a lead of 50 m.
6532 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 20,87,576
Item No: 3
1742 Lift 1.5m to 3m 316.5 Cu.m 551287
Ref- Bihar SoR 18, Code .No2.12-,Pg-73
Item No: 4
5436.09 under floors including, watering, ramming 238.6 Cu.m 12,97,050
Ref- Bihar SoR 18, Code .No-2.28,Pg-75
Item No: 5
of specified grade exluding the cost of centring
1:3:6 (1 Cement: 3 coarse sand : 6 graded stone
914.9 4408.7 Cum 40,33,654
aggregate 20 mm nominal size)
Item No :6
139
CSIR-NEERI
BOQ – Diversion Sewer (1700m)

143.24 Cement mortar 1:4 (1 cement: 4 coarse sand) 596.8 Sqm 85,483
Ref- Bihar SoR 18, Code .No-6.18A/6.18.4A,Pg-87
Item No :7
1:2 (1 cement : 2 fine sand) including testing of
1700 R.C.C. pipes NP2 class 450 mm dia 729.3 Meter 12,39,810
Ref- Bihar SoR 18, Code .No-19.6,19.6.5,Pg-242
Item No: 8
centring,shuttering,finishing and reinforcement-
3.20 aggregate 20 mm nominal size) 4902 Cum 15,701
Sub-total (A) 93,55,803
Add for Structural design and Detailed drawing
1.50% 1,40,337
preparation (1.5% of B)
Sub-total (C) 94,96,140
Actual-cost (D)= Revised basic cost (C)- 4% of
91,16,295
work cost
140
CSIR-NEERI
25.3.2 I&D-2 (BOQ)
BOQ- Interceptor Pit (I&D-2)

Rate Per Unit of
Qty Description of item Amount (Rs)
Unit(RS) Material
Item No: 1
24 11.27 Sqm 275
lift upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
upto 50 m and lift upto 1.5 m; disposed earth
to be levelled and neatly dressed.
37 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 11,687
Item No: 3
Extra for excavating trenches for pipes, cables etc.in
18 Lift from 1.5 to 3 m 316.5 Cu.m 5,787
Item No: 4
4 959 Cu.m 3,682
Item No: 5
1.4 PCC M 25 -1:3:6 4408.7 Cum 6,081
Item No: 6
141
CSIR-NEERI

Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
etc. upt floor five level excluding cost of centring,
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
9.46 Total Qty of RCC 5723.3 Cu.m 54,155
Item No: 7
40 Total Qty of plaster 161.9 Sqm 6417
Item No: 8
thick with cement concrete 1:2:4(1cement:2:2
29 245.5 Sqm 7,185
nominal size)
Item No: 9
19 approved brand and manufacture to give an even 46.50 Sqm 861
shade .
Ref- Bihar SoR 18, Code .No-13.77/13.77A.1,Pg-151
Item No: 10
1041 75.2 Kg 78,272
12mm dia.
Ref- Bihar SoR 16, Code .No-5.22/5.22.7C, Pg-86
Item No: 11
etc. complete :
142
CSIR-NEERI

Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
Item No: 12
M200
1 0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m, 1.30x1.30x1.45 5,000 Each 5000
Market Rate
Item No: 13
2 651.51 Each 1303.02
Ref- Bihar SoR 18, Code .No-7130,Pg-37
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
Steel glazed door,window/ ventilator, all members
306.15 44.67 Kg
viz. F7D, F4B,K11 and K12B etc.
Item No: 15
1 C.I.sluice valve (with caps) class I : 300 mm dia 14426 Each 14426
1.50% 3,246
preparation (1.5% of A)
Sub-total (B) 2,19,619
Actual-cost (C)= Revised basic cost (B)- 4% of work
2,10,834
cost
143
CSIR-NEERI
BOQ – Diversion Sewer 1777m

Item No: 1
4196.08 11.27 Sqm 47289.8
lift upto 1.5 m
Item No: 2
drains(not exceeding 1.5 m in width or 10 sqm on
6828 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 21,82,075
Item No: 3
1821 Lift 1.5m to 3m 316.5 Cu.m 576243
Item No: 4
5962.24 under floors including, watering, ramming 238.6 Cu.m 14,22,590
Item No: 5
1:3:6 (1 Cement: 3 coarse sand : 6 graded stone
875.9 4408.7 Cum 38,61,565
aggregate 20 mm nominal size)
Item No :6
144
CSIR-NEERI
BOQ – Diversion Sewer 1777m

Item No :7
etc. complete :
Item No: 8
Sub-total (A) 91,39,893
1.50% 1,37,098
Sub-total (C) 92,76,991
Actual-cost (D)= Revised basic cost (C)- 4% of work
89,05,912
cost
145
CSIR-NEERI
BOQ Treated Water – 680m

Item No: 1
1607.16 vegetation and inequalities not exceeding 15 cm deep and 11.27 Sqm 18112.7
Item No: 2
Earth work in excavation in foundation trenches or drains
(not exceeding 1.5 m in width or 10 sqm on plan) including
dressing of sides and ramming of bottoms, lift upto 1.5 m .
including getting out the excavated soil and disposal of
surplus excavated soil as directed, within a lead of 50 m.
2615 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 8,35,767
Item No: 3
Extra for excavating trenches for pipes, cables etc.in all kinds
of soil exceeding 3 m in depth, but not exceeding 4.5
m.(Rate is over corresponding basic item for depth upto 1.5
meter.)
-523 Lift 1.5m to 3m 316.5 Cu.m -165532
Item No: 4
1180.19 floors including, watering, ramming consolidating and 238.6 Cu.m 2,81,593
dressing complete.
Item No: 5
Providing and laying in position cement concrete of specified
grade excluding the cost of centring and shuttering-all work
upto plinth level.
1:3:6 (1 Cement: 3 coarse sand : 6 graded stone aggregate
366.0 4408.7 Cum 16,13,462
20 mm nominal size)
Item No :6
foundations and plinth in :
146
CSIR-NEERI
BOQ Treated Water – 680m

Item No :7
R.C.C. pipes with collars jointed with stiff mixture of cement
mortar in the proportion of 1:2 (1 cement : 2 fine sand)
including testing of joints etc. complete :
Item No: 8
Providing and laying in position specified grade of reinforced
cement concrete excluding the cost of centring, shuttering,
finishing and reinforcement-All work upto plinth level
1.28 aggregate 20 mm nominal size) Inspection 4902 Cum 6,280
chamber/ Rcc Cover
Sub-total (A) 31,06,122

Add for Structural design and Detailed drawing preparation
1.50% 46,592
(1.5% of A)
Sub-total (B) 31,52,714
Actual-cost (C)= Revised basic cost (B)- 4% of work cost 30,26,606
147
CSIR-NEERI
25.3.3 I&D-3 (BOQ)
Bill of Quantities-3A
Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
Item No: 1
24 vegetation and inequalities not exceeding 15 cm deep and 11.27 Sqm 275
Item No: 2
1.5m;disposed earth to be levelled and neatly dressed.
37 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 11,687
Item No: 3
1.5 meter.)
30 Lift from 1.5 to 3 m 316.5 Cu.m 9,644
Item No: 4
4 959 Cu.m 3,682
Item No: 5
1.4 PCC M 25 -1:3:6 4408.7 Cum 6,081
Item No: 6
148
CSIR-NEERI
Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
and struts, etc. upt floor five level excluding cost of
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
Item No: 7
Item No: 8
34 cement concrete 1:2:4(1cement:2:2 coarse sand :4 graded 245.5 Sqm 8,401
Item No: 9
25 46.50 Sqm 1,143
approved brand and manufacture to give an even shade .
Item No: 10
complete
Item No: 11
complete :
Item No: 12
M200
149
CSIR-NEERI
Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
1 0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m, 1.30x1.30x1.45 5,000 Each 5000
Market Rate
Item No: 13
2 651.51 Each 1303.02
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
423.9 44.67 Kg
Item No: 15
1.50% 3,824
Bill of Quantities-3B
Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
Item No: 1
Item No: 2
1.5m;disposedearth to be levelled and neatly dressed.
37 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 11,687
150
CSIR-NEERI
Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
Item No: 3
1.5 meter.)
30 Lift from 1.5 to 3 m 316.5 Cu.m 9,644
Item No: 4
4 959 Cu.m 3,682
Item No: 5
1.4 PCC M 25 -1:3:6 4408.7 Cum 6,081
Item No: 6
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
Item No: 7
Item No: 8
151
CSIR-NEERI
Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
Item No: 9
25 46.50 Sqm 1,143
Item No: 10
complete
Item No: 11
complete :
Item No: 12
M200
1 0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m, 1.30x1.30x1.45 5,000 Each 5000
Market Rate
Item No: 13
2 651.51 Each 1303.02
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
423.9 44.67 Kg
Item No: 15
1 C.I. sluice valve (with caps) class I : 300 mm dia 14426 Each 14426
152
CSIR-NEERI
Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
1.50% 3,824
Bill of Quantities-3C
Unit(RS) Material (Rs)
Item No: 1
Item No: 2
37 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 11,687
Item No: 3
1.5 meter.)
35 Lift from 1.5 to 3 m 316.5 Cu.m 11,187
Item No: 4
4 959 Cu.m 3,682
Item No: 5
153
CSIR-NEERI
1.4 PCC M 25 -1:3:6 4408.7 Cum 6,081
Item No: 6
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
Item No: 7
Item No: 8
Item No: 9
27 46.50 Sqm 1,270
Item No: 10
complete
Item No: 11
154
CSIR-NEERI
complete :
Item No: 12
M200
1 0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m, 1.30x1.30x1.45 5,000 Each 5000
Market Rate
Item No: 13
2 651.51 Each 1303.02
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
423.9 44.67 Kg
Item No: 15
1.50% 4,010
155
CSIR-NEERI
Bill of Quantities-3A-3B (277 m)

Item No: 1
Item No: 2
1068 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 3,41,179
Item No: 3
1.5 meter.)
285 Lift 1.5m to 3m 316.5 Cu.m 90099
Item No: 4
dressing complete.
Item No: 5
136.5 4408.7 Cum 6,01,944
20 mm nominal size)
Item No :6
156
CSIR-NEERI
Bill of Quantities-3A-3B (277 m)

Item No :7
Item No: 8
plinth level
chamber/ Rcc Cover
Sub-total (A) 14,26,748

1.50% 21,401
Sub-total (C) 14,48,149
Bill of Quantities-3B-3C (956 m)

Item No: 1
Item No: 2
disposal of surplus excavated soil as directed, within a
lead of 50 m.
157
CSIR-NEERI

3675 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 11,74,492
Item No: 3
kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth, but not exceeding
4.5 m.(Rate is over corresponding basic item for depth
upto 1.5 meter.)
2205 Lift 1.5m to 3m 316.5 Cu.m 697860
Item No: 4
dressing complete.
Item No: 5
471.2 4408.7 Cum 20,77,466
20 mm nominal size)
Item No :6
Item No :7
Item No: 8
centring, shuttering, finishing and reinforcement-All work
upto plinth level
158
CSIR-NEERI

Sub-total (A) 55,55,682
1.50% 83,335
Sub-total (C) 56,39,018
Bill of Quantities-3C-STP2 (1000 m)

Item No: 1
Item No: 2
disposal of surplus excavated soil as directed, within a lead
of 50 m.
3844 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 12,28,491
Item No: 3
kinds of soil exceeding 3 m in depth , but not exceeding 4.5
1.5 meter.)
2819 Lift 1.5m to 3m 316.5 Cu.m 892155
Item No: 4
dressing complete.
159
CSIR-NEERI
Bill of Quantities-3C-STP2 (1000 m)

Item No: 5
1104.0 4408.7 Cum 48,67,238
20 mm nominal size)
Item No :6
Item No :7
Item No: 8
plinth level
Sub-total (A) 85,96,527
1.50% 1,28,948
Sub-total (B) 87,25,475
160
CSIR-NEERI
Treated water Line –BOQ (100m)

Item No: 1
Item No: 2
388 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 1,23,954
Item No: 3
1.5 meter.)
-103 Lift 1.5m to 3m 316.5 Cu.m -32734
Item No: 4
170.26 floors including, watering, ramming consolidating and 238.6 Cu.m 40,624
dressing complete.
Item No: 5
49.3 4408.7 Cum 2,17,308
20 mm nominal size)
Item No :6
161
CSIR-NEERI
Treated water Line –BOQ (100m)

Item No :7
100 R.C.C. pipes NP2 class 300 mm dia 522.2 Meter 52,220
Item No: 8
plinth level
0.19 aggregate 20 mm nominal size) Inspection 4902 Cum 924
chamber/ Rcc Cover
1.50% 6,116
162
CSIR-NEERI
25.3.4 I&D-4 (BOQ)
Interceptor Pit- BOQ (I&D-4)

Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
Item No: 1
Item No: 2
37 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 11,687
Item No: 3
1.5 meter.)
20 Lift from 1.5 to 3 m 316.5 Cu.m 6,172
Item No: 4
4 959 Cu.m 3,682
Item No: 5
1.4 PCC M 25 -1:3:6 4408.7 Cum 6,081
Item No: 6
163
CSIR-NEERI

Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
RCC M-25- 1:1.5:3
Item No: 7
Item No: 8
Item No: 9
19 46.50 Sqm 889
Item No: 10
complete
Item No: 11
complete :
Item No: 12
M200
164
CSIR-NEERI

Rate Per Unit of
Unit(RS) Material
1 0.6x0.6x0.9m , 0.9x0.9x1.45m, 1.30x1.30x1.45 5,000 Each 5000
Market Rate
Item No: 13
2 651.51 Each 1303.02
Item No: 14
Sluice Gate
317.925 44.67 Kg
Item No: 15
1.50% 3,303
165
CSIR-NEERI
BOQ (Diversion Sewer)- 37m

Item No: 1
Item No: 2
146 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 46,636
Item No: 3
1.5 meter.)
39 Lift 1.5m to 3m 316.5 Cu.m 12316
Item No: 4
dressing complete.
Item No: 5
17.4 4408.7 Cum 76,699
20 mm nominal size)
Item No :6
166
CSIR-NEERI
BOQ (Diversion Sewer)- 37m

Item No :7
Item No: 8
plinth level
0.14 aggregate 20 mm nominal size) 4902 Cum 683
1.50% 2,841
167
CSIR-NEERI
Treated Water Line (120 m)

Item No: 1
Item No: 2
465 Lift upto 1.50 m 319.6 Cu.m 1,48,499
Item No: 3
1.5 meter.)
-124 Lift 1.5m to 3m 316.5 Cu.m -39216
Item No: 4
dressing complete.
Item No: 5
53.9 4408.7 Cum 2,37,677
20 mm nominal size)
Item No :6
168
CSIR-NEERI
Treated Water Line (120 m)

Item No :7
Item No: 8
plinth level
chamber/ Rcc Cover

1.50% 7,011
169
CSIR-NEERI
25.4 Design, Measurement and bill of Quantities for Sewage Treatment Plant
25.4.1 STP 1 – SBR (8.9 MLD)
Free Total Wall

Sr. Length Width Depth Beds
Tanks Board Depth Thickness
No. (m) (m) (m) (Nos)
(m) (m) (m)
1 Intake well-01 18 18.0 5.0 0.5 5.5 1 0.2
2 Screen Chamber 4.2 3 1.6 0.3 1.9 2 0.2
3 Grit Chamber 9.7 1.4 2.5 0.3 2.8 2 0.2
Oil and Grease
4 10 3 5.0 0.3 5.3 1 0.2
Chamber
5 Equalization Tank 21.6 21.5 5 0.3 5.1 1 0.2
6 SBR tank-I 19.5 19 3.0 0.3 3.3 2 0.2
7 SBR tank-II 19.5 19 3.0 0.3 3.3 2 0.2
8 Sludge Holding Tank 19.5 19 2.0 0.3 2.3 1 0.2
Chlorine Contact
9 Tank Cum Filter feed 20 20 2.8 0.3 3.1 1 0.2
tank
10 Treated water tank 13.6 13.6 4.0 0.3 4.3 1 0.2
11 Control Room 6.0 6.0 4.0 0 4.0 1 0.23
Civil Measurement Sheet and Bill of Quantities for 8.9 MLD SBR Plant
Ite
L W D Rate Amount
m Item of work N Qty Unit
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
No
Surface dressing of the ground
including removing vegetation and
inequalities not exceeding 15 cm deep
1 and disposal of rubbish, lead upto 50 m 10028 sqm 4.15 41,616
and lift upto 1.5 m
(Ref- BCD SOR 2018, Code .No-
2.29/2.29.1,Pg-75).
Earth work in excavation in foundation
trenches or drains (not exceeding 1.5 m
in width or 10 sqm on plan) including
dressing of sides and ramming of
bottoms, lift upto 1.5 m including
2
getting out the excavated soil and
disposal of surplus excavated soil as
directed, within a lead of 50 m.
(Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.2.8/2.8.1
Pg.72)
170
CSIR-NEERI
Ite
L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
No
Lift 0.00 to 1.50 m
Intake well-01 1 20.53 20.4 1.5 628.2 Cum
Screen Chamber 1 6.65 8.6 1.5 85.8 Cum
Grit Chamber 1 12.11 5.4 0 0.0 Cum
Oil and Grease Chamber 1 12.86 5 0 0.0 Cum
Equalization Tank 1 23.96 23.9 1.5 859.0 Cum
SBR tank-I 1 21.92 40.6 1.5 1334.8 Cum
SBR tank-II 1 21.92 40.6 1.5 1334.8 Cum
Sludge Holding Tank 1 21.92 21.4 1.5 703.6 Cum
Chlorine Contact Tank Cum Filter feed
1 22.27 22.4 1.5 748.1 Cum
tank
Treated water tank 1 16.03 16 1.5 384.8 Cum
Control Room 1 8.46 8.46 0 0.0 Cum
Total Qty 6079.0 Cum 75.06 4,56,290
trenches or drains (not exceeding 1.5 m
in width or 10 sqm on plan) including
dressing of sides and ramming of
3 bottoms, lift upto 1.5 m including
getting out the excavated soil and
disposal of surplus excavated soil as
directed, within a lead of 50 m.
Ref:-BCD SOR 18, Code no.2.11, Pg.73
Intake well-01 1 20.53 20.40 1.00 418.80 Cum
Grit Chamber 1 12.11 5.40 0.00 0.00 Cum
Oil and Grease Chamber 1 12.86 5.00 0.00 0.00 Cum
SBR tank-I 1 21.92 40.60 0.00 0.00 Cum
SBR tank-II 1 21.92 40.60 0.00 0.00 Cum
1 22.27 22.40 1.00 498.76 Cum
tank
Treated water tank 1 16.03 16.00 1.00 256.54 Cum
Control Room 1 8.46 8.46 0.00 0.00 Cum
Total Qty 1803.9 Cum 75.06 1,35,403
171
CSIR-NEERI
Ite
L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
No
Soling:- Supplying, filling, spreading &
levelling stone boulders of size range
5cm to 20 cm, in recharge pit, in the
required thickness, for all leads & lifts,
4
all complete as per direction of
Engineer-in-charge
(Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.24.5,
Pg.266)
Intake well-01 1 19.13 19.00 0.3 109.0 Cum
Grit Chamber 1 10.71 4.00 0.3 12.9 Cum
SBR tank-I 1 20.52 39.20 0.3 241.3 Cum
SBR tank-II 1 20.52 39.20 0.3 241.3 Cum
1 20.87 21.00 0.3 131.5 Cum
tank
Control Room 1 7.06 7.06 0.3 15.0 Cum
Total Qty 1114.1 Cum 1410 15,70,840
concrete of specified grade excluding
the cost of centring and shuttering-all
5
work upto plinth level.
(Ref:-BCD SOR 2018, Code no.4.1.3,
Pg.79)
PCC M 150
Intake well-01 1 18.93 18.80 0.15 53.4 Cum
Grit Chamber 1 10.51 3.80 0.15 6.0 Cum
SBR tank-I 1 20.32 39.00 0.15 118.9 Cum
SBR tank-II 1 20.32 39.00 0.15 118.9 Cum
172
CSIR-NEERI
Ite
L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
No
1 20.67 20.80 0.15 64.5 Cum
tank
Control Room 1 6.86 6.86 0.15 7.1 Cum
Total Qty 546.0 Cum 3779 20,63,300
Reinforced cement concrete work in
wall (any thickness), including attached
pilasters, buttresses, plinth and string
courses, fillets, columns, pillars, piers,
abutments, posts and struts, etc. upto
6
floor five level excluding cost of
centring, shuttering, finishing and
reinforcement.
(Ref :- BCD SOR 2018, Code
no.5.2/5.2.2 Pg.83) .
for raft slab M 250
Intake well-01 1 18.7 18.60 0.25 87.1 Cum
Grit Chamber 1 10.3 3.60 0.25 9.3 Cum
SBR tank-I 1 20.1 38.80 0.25 195.1 Cum
SBR tank-II 1 20.1 38.80 0.25 195.1 Cum
1 20.5 20.60 0.25 105.4 Cum
tank
Control Room 1 6.7 6.66 0.25 11.1 Cum
Total Qty 891.8 Cum 7464.3 66,56,491
beams, suspended floors, roofs having
slope upto 15, landings, balconies,
shelves, chajjas, lintels, bands, plain
7
window sills, staircases and spiral stair
cases upto floor five level excluding the
cost of centring, shuttering, finishing
and reinforcement with 1:2:4(1
173
CSIR-NEERI
Ite
L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
No
cement:2 coarse sand:4 graded stone
aggregate 20 mm nominal size).
(Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.5.3,
Pg.83)
RCC M-250
Roof Slab/ Vertical walls
a) Vertical walls
Intake well-01 2 18.1 0.2 5.5 39.9 Cum
2 18.4 0.2 5.5 40.5 Cum
4 3.4 0.2 1.9 5.2 Cum
Grit Chamber 4 9.7 0.2 2.8 21.8 Cum
4 1.8 0.2 2.8 4.0 Cum
2 3.0 0.2 5.3 6.4 Cum
2 21.90 0.2 5.1 44.7 Cum
SBR tank-I 4 19.52 0.2 3.3 51.5 Cum
4 19.40 0.2 3.3 51.2 Cum
SBR tank-II 4 19.5 0.2 3.3 51.5 Cum
4 23.00 0.2 3.3 60.7 Cum
2 19.40 0.2 2.3 17.8 Cum
2 19.87 0.2 3.1 24.6 Cum
tank
2 20.40 0.2 3.1 25.3 Cum
2 14.00 0.2 4.3 24.1 Cum
Total walls 583.2 Cum 7464.3 43,53,376
b) Top Slab
Intake well-01 1 18.53 18.40 0.2 68.2 Cum
Grit Chamber 0 10.11 1.80 0.2 0.0 Cum
174
CSIR-NEERI
Ite
L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
No
2 20.27 20.40 0.2 165.4 Cum
tank
Control Room 1 6.46 6.46 0.2 8.3 Cum
Total 390.22 Cum
Estimate Manholes
Intake well-01 8 0.7 0.9 0.2 1.01 Cum
8 0.7 0.9 0.2 1.01 Cum
tank
Deduct manhole from top slab 40 5.04 Cum
Net Qty 385.2 Cum 7464.3 28,75,139
c) Beams & Column 558.1 Cum 7464.3 41,65,502
Total RCC Qty of Top & Bottom Slab
TOTAL RCC 2418.2 Cum
and Vertical wall
straightening, cutting, bending, placing
8 in position and binding all complete
(Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code
no.5.22/5.22.7C Pg.86)
Tor bar at 110Kg/cum 266.0 MT 55623 1,47,96,057
Cement plaster in course sand; 12 mm
cement plaster of mix: 1:4 (1 cement : 4
9 coarse sand)
(Ref: BCD SOR 2018-19, Code No.
13.11.2, Page No. 167)
a) Internal Plaster
Intake well-01 2 18.1 5.5 199.4 Sqm
2 18 5.5 198.0 Sqm
Screen Chamber 4 4.2 1.9 32.3 Sqm
175
CSIR-NEERI
Ite
L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
No
4 3.0 1.9 22.8 Sqm
Grit Chamber 4 9.7 2.8 108.8 Sqm
4 1.4 2.8 15.7 Sqm
Oil and Grease Chamber 2 10.5 5.3 110.9 Sqm
2 2.6 5.3 27.6 Sqm
Equalization Tank 2 21.6 5.1 219.9 Sqm
2 21.5 5.1 219.3 Sqm
SBR tank-I 4 19.52 3.3 257.6 Sqm
4 19.00 3.3 250.8 Sqm
SBR tank-II 4 19.5 3.3 257.6 Sqm
4 19.0 3.3 250.8 Sqm
Sludge Holding Tank 2 19.5 2.3 89.8 Sqm
2 19.00 2.3 87.4 Sqm
2 19.9 3.1 123.2 Sqm
tank
2 20.00 3.1 124.0 Sqm
Treated water tank 2 13.6 4.3 117.2 Sqm
2 13.60 4.3 117.0 Sqm
Control Room 2 6.0 4.0 48.0 Sqm
2 6 4.0 48.0 Sqm
Total 2926.0 Sqm 88.9 2,60,125
b) External cement plaster
Intake well-01 2 18.1 5.5 199.4 Sqm
2 18.4 5.5 202.4 Sqm
4 3.4 1.9 25.8 Sqm
4 1.8 2.8 20.2 Sqm
2 3.0 5.3 31.8 Sqm
2 21.9 5.1 223.4 Sqm
SBR tank-I 4 19.5 3.3 257.6 Sqm
4 19.4 3.3 256.1 Sqm
SBR tank-II 4 19.5 3.3 257.6 Sqm
176
CSIR-NEERI
Ite
L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
No
4 19.4 3.3 256.1 Sqm
2 19.4 2.3 89.2 Sqm
2 19.9 3.1 123.2 Sqm
tank
2 20.4 3.1 126.5 Sqm
2 14.0 4.3 120.4 Sqm
2 6.5 4.0 51.7 Sqm
Total 2968.3 Sqm 88.9 2,63,880
Providing and laying damp-proof
Course 50 mm thick with cement
concrete 1:2:4 (1cement: 2 coarse sand
10 :4 graded stone aggregate 20mm
nominal size)
(Ref: BCD SOR 2018-19, Code No. 4.11,
Page No. 80).
Intake well-01 2 18.1 5.5 199.4 Sqm
2 18.4 5.5 202.4 Sqm
4 3.4 1.9 25.8 Sqm
4 1.8 2.8 20.2 Sqm
2 3.0 5.3 31.8 Sqm
2 21.9 5.1 223.4 Sqm
SBR tank-I 4 19.5 3.3 257.6 Sqm
4 19.4 3.3 256.1 Sqm
SBR tank-II 4 19.5 3.3 257.6 Sqm
4 19.4 3.3 256.1 Sqm
2 19.4 2.3 89.2 Sqm
2 19.9 3.1 123.2 Sqm
tank
177
CSIR-NEERI
Ite
L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
No
2 20.4 3.1 126.5 Sqm
2 14.0 4.3 120.4 Sqm
2 6.5 4.0 51.7 Sqm
Total 2968.3 Sqm 279.36 8,29,219
Providing and fixing on wall face
unplastidsed PVC (working pressure 4
kgf per sqm) rain water pipes
conforming to IS: 1985 including
11
jointing with seal ring conforming to IS:
5382 leaving 10 mm gap for thermal
expansion (Ref: BCD SOR 2018-19,
Code No. 12.78, Page No. 159).
110 mm dia 6kg/cm2 pipes 470 Rmt 218.4 1,02,648
Filling available excavated earth
(excluding rock) in trenches, plinth,
sides of foundations etc. in layers not
exceeding 20 cm in depth:
12 consolidating each deposited layer by
ramming and watering lead
(Ref: BCD SOR 2018-19, Code No. 2.27,
Page No. 75)+(Ref: BCD SOR 2018-19, Sr
No. 2.27.1, Page No. 75)
Total excavation Total 7882.9 Cum
Deductions
Intake well-01 1 18.5 18.4 2.5 852.4 Cum
Oil and Grease Chamber 1 10.9 3 0.0 0.0 Cum
Equilization Tank 1 22.0 21.9 2.5 1202.3 Cum
SBR tank-I 1 19.9 38.6 1.5 1153.2 Cum
SBR tank-II 1 19.9 38.6 1.5 1153.2 Cum
1 20.3 20.4 2.5 1033.6 Cum
tank
Treated water tank 1 14.0 14 2.5 491.2 Cum
178
CSIR-NEERI
Ite
L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
No
Total deduction 6542.2 Cum
Net qty 1340.8 Cum
Back Filling Total 1341 m3 105 1,40,779
Brick work with bricks of class
designation 100A in foundations and
plinth in: Cement mortar 1:6 (1 cement:
6 coarse sand) & Extra for Brick work in
13 superstructure above plinth level upto
floor V cum
Ref: BCD SOR 2018-19, Code No.
6.1.14A, Page No. 93) + (Ref: BCD SOR
2018-19, Code No. 6.3A, Page No. 93) .
Control Room 2 6.0 0.23 4.0 11 Cum
2 6.46 0.23 4.0 12 Cum
Boundary Wall 2 25 0.23 3.5 40 Cum
2 20 0.23 3.5 32 Cum
Total 95 Cum 3184.5 3,03,726
bHp
14 Dewatering 500 26.12 13,060
hr
Manhole 40 Nos 10,395 4,15,800
MS Railings and Gate @ 8Kg per Rmt 200 mt 109 21,848
15 Inspection stairs- 2 Nos. 1000 mt 70 70,238
Total civil cost for STP 3,95,35,338
179
CSIR-NEERI
Estimation of Electromechanical Supplies for 8.9 MLD SBR Plant

Sr. Cost in
Particular Description Quantity Unit
No Rs.
Manual Screen For Coarse Screen & Fine Screen-Use
1 2 Nos 26,50,000
(1W-Fine and 1W-Coarse) standard material
Electro-Magnetic Flow Supply, testing & commissioning of
2 Meter (2 No) electromagnetic Flow meter, Line size-50 2 Nos 5,56,500
mm, Make-Forbes Marshall/ Equivalent
3 Air grid (1 Lot) SHT AND Equalisation Tank, TWT 1 Lot 10,60,000
Supply, testing & commissioning of sewage
Submersible Pump, Make- Kirloskar, Flow-
Sewage Submersible Pump-
4 3090 LPM, Head-5-18 m, Pump 4 Nos 6,36,000
In Intake Well
Power(kW/Hp)-7.5/10.0 Three Phase Power
supply, Partical Handling-45 mm, MoC-All CI
Supply, testing & commissioning of sewage
Submersible Pump, Make- Kirloskar, Flow-
Sewage Submersible Pump-
5 3090 LPM, Head-5-18 m, Pump 4 Nos 6,36,000
In Eqli. Tank
Power(kW/Hp)-7.5/10.0 Three Phase Power
supply, Partical Handling-45 mm, MoC-All CI
6 Float sensor (7 Nos.) Normally Open, ON/OFF Type 7 Nos 27,825
7 Air grid For SBR Tanks 1 Lot 11,92,500
for CT, IST & TWT(Disc type Coarse) & SBR
8 Diffuser (1 lot) 1 Lot 19,85,778
Tank(1 meter long membrane)
Flow-715 m3/hr, Power-20 Hp for Bio
9 Air blowers (3W+1S) 4 Nos 10,07,000
reactor, EQT, SHT
10 Air Blower (4W+1S) Flow-1072 m3/hr,Power-25 Hp 5 Nos 13,97,875
SS Decanter Mechanism
11 Moving decanter with Hydraulic system 4 Nos 95,40,000
(4 Sets)
Supply, installation, testing & commissioning
Return Activated Sludge of Sewage Submersible Pump, Make-
12 /Excess sludge pump Kirloskar, Flow-61 LPS, Head-17 m, Pump 5 Nos 13,91,250
(4W+1S) Power (kW/Hp)- 18.7/25.0, Three Phase
Power supply, Partical Handling-40 mm,
Supply, testing & commissioning of
Pressure Sand Filter Activated Carbon Filter, Vessel Size-DIA 2000
13 3 Set 12,91,875
( 3 No) X 2000 HOS, top distribution and bottom
drum collection, MOC-MSEP
of Filter Feed Pump, Make Kirloskar /
Filter Feed Pump
14 equivalent, Flow- 39 LPS, Head-24 m, Pump 4 Nos 2,75,600
(2W+ 2S)
Power(kW/Hp)-11/15.0 Three Phase Power
supply,
180
CSIR-NEERI
Estimation of Electromechanical Supplies for 8.9 MLD SBR Plant

Sr. Cost in
No Rs.
Supply, testing & commissioning of
Activated Carbon Filter Activated Carbon Filter, Vessel Size-DIA 2000
15 3 Set 15,50,250
( 3 No) X 2000 HOS, Top Distribution And Bottom
Drum Collection, MOC-MSEP
Chlorine Dosing Supply, installation, testing & commissioning
( 1 set) of Disinfection System, Dosing Tank Make:
Sintex, Tank Capacity:3000Ltr
Tank & Lid MOC: LDPE & FRP, Dosing Pump-
Make: Accudyne (MRIPL)Dosing P Type:
16 1 Set 2,58,375
Electronically Actuated Diaphragm Dosing
Pump, Head of MOC: PP, Maximum flow: 0
To 320 LPH, Maximum Pressure: 5.0
KG/CM2 Coil Rating: 40watt,I/P
Supply:230V,50HZ,1Phase
of Centrifuge Machine (250 Kg/Batch) -Outer
Shell – 6mm thk. M.S. Filter Bag – Multi P.P.
Centrifuge Machine Bag
17 2 Set 9,53,750
(1 Set) Basket Size – 1220mm Ø × 500mm Ht.RPM -
1440 Complete with Pulley & Electric Motor
12.5 HP 1440 RPM TEFC STD. “CROMPTON”
Make.
supply, testing & commissioning of SCADA
18 Control Panel (1 Job) 1 Set 15,00,000
System for Plant Automation
Supply Installation Testing & Commissioning
of Cabling (Only For Electro-Mechanicals
units within the STP internal parts) Cabling
includes POLYCAB/ Finoles/ Havels cables &
Cabling and Piping
19 Flexible cable With galvanized cable tray & 1 L/s 19,75,625
(1 Job)
cover along with required supports and
tagging and all internal piping within plant
area. The mains to the Panel, earthing shall
be Clients scope.
Total Amount 2,98,86,203
181
CSIR-NEERI
25.4.2 STP 2 - Phytorid (1.9 MLD)
Sr. Length Width Depth Free Beds wall

Tanks
No. (m) (m) (m) Board (nos) thickness
1 Intake well 16.1 13 2.5 0.3 1 0.25
2 Fine Screen Chamber 4.6 1.8 2.1 0.2 1 0.25
Oil and Grease
3 7.9 2.5 2.2 0.2 1 0.25
Chamber
4 Settler Tank 24.6 6 3 0.3 3 0.25
5 Phytorid Bed 25.3 6 2.5 0.3 11 0.25
6 treated Water Tank 15.8 8 3 0.3 1 0.25
Measurement Sheet and Bill of Quantities for 1.9 MLD Phytorid

L W D Rate Amount
Item of work N Qty Unit
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Item No 1
Surface dressing of the ground
including removing vegetation and
inequalities not exceeding 15 cm
deep and disposal of rubbish, lead
upto 50 m and lift upto 1.5 m
intake well 18.58 15.5 287.9 m2
For screen chamber 7.11 4.3 30.6 m2
For Oil & Grease Trap 10.42 5 52.1 m2
For Primary settler 27.13 21 569.7 m2
For Phytorid bed 28.63 71 2033.0 m2
For treated water tank 18.33 10.5 192.5 m2
Total Qty 3165.8 m2 11.3 35,678
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code
no.2.29/2.29.1, Pg.75
Item No 2
Earth work in excavation in
foundation trenches or drains (not
exceeding 1.5 m in width or 10 sqm
on plan) including dressing of sides
and ramming of bottoms, lift upto
1.5 m. including getting out the
excavated soil and disposal of
surplus excavated soil as directed,
within a lead of 50 m.
182
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Lift 0.00 to 1.50 m
intake well 18.58 15.5 1.5 431.9 m3
For screen chamber 7.11 4.3 0.58 17.7 m3
For Oil & Grease Trap 10.42 5.00 0.58 30.2 m3
For Primary settler 27.13 21 1.5 854.6 m3
For Phytorid bed 28.63 71 1.5 3049.5 m3
For treated water tank 18.33 10.5 1.5 288.8 m3
Total Qty 4672.6 m3 320 14,93,373
no.2.8/2.8.1 Pg.75
Item No 3
Earth work in excavation in
foundation trenches or drains (not
exceeding 1.5 m in width or 10 sqm
on plan) including dressing of sides
and ramming of bottoms, lift upto
1.5 m. including getting out the
excavated soil and disposal of
surplus excavated soil as directed,
Lift 1.5 to 3.0 m and beyond
intake well 18.58 15.5 2.03 584.5 m3
For screen chamber 7.11 4.3 0 0.0 m3
For Oil & Grease Trap 10.42 5 0 0.0 m3
For Primary settler 27.13 21 0.88 501.4 m3
Total Qty 2288.9 m3 446 10,20,142
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.2.11,
Pg.75
Item No 4
Supplying, filling, spreading &
levelling stone boulders of size range
5 cm to 20 cm, in recharge pit, in the
required thickness, for all leads &
lifts, all complete as per direction of
Engineer-in-charge
Intake Well 17.18 14.1 0.2 48.4 m3
183
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
3
Screen chamber 5.71 2.9 0.2 3.3 m
Oil and Grease Chamber 9.02 3.6 0.2 6.5 m3
Primary Settler 25.73 19.6 0.2 100.9 m3
Phytorid Bed 27.93 69.6 0.2 388.8 m3
Treated Water Tank 16.93 9.1 0.2 30.8 m3
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.24.5,
Total Qty 578.8 m3 959 5,55,023
Pg.266
Item No 5
Providing and laying in position
cement concrete of specified grade
excluding the cost of centring and
PCC M 150
Intake Well 16.98 13.9 0.1 23.6 m3
Screen chamber 5.51 2.7 0.1 1.5 m3
Phytorid Bed 27.83 69.4 0.1 193.2 m3
Total Qty 285.7 m3 4151 11,85,914
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.4.1.3,
Pg.79
Item No 5.1
Centring and shuttering including
strutting, propping etc. and removal
or form work for
PCC M 150
Intake Well 4 16.98 0.1 6.8 m2
4 13.9 0.1 5.6 m2
Screen chamber 4 5.51 0.1 2.2 m2
4 2.7 0.1 1.1 m2
Oil and Grease Chamber 4 8.82 0.1 3.5 m2
4 3.4 0.1 1.4 m2
Primary Settler 4 25.53 0.1 10.2 m2
4 19.4 0.1 7.8 m2
Phytorid Bed 4 27.83 0.1 11.1 m2
184
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
2
4 69.4 0.1 27.8 m
Treated Water Tank 4 16.73 0.1 6.7 m2
4 8.9 0.1 3.6 m2
TOTAL 87.6 m2 186 16,292
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no. 4.3.1
Pg.79
Item No 6
Providing and laying in position
specified grade of reinforced cement
concrete excluding the cost of
centring, shuttering, finishing and
reinforcement-All work upto plinth
level; 1:1:5:3 (1 cement: 1.5 coarse
sand:3 graded stone aggregate 20
mm nominal size)
for raft slab M20
Intake Well 16.8 13.7 0.28 64.4 m3
Phytorid Bed 27.73 69.2 0.28 537.4 m3
Total Qty 789.6 m3 4902 38,70,858
Ref:- BCD SOR 18, Code no.5.1/5.1.2
Pg.83
Item No 6.1
or form work for
for raft slab M20
Intake Well 4 16.78 0.28 18.8 m2
4 13.7 0.28 15.3 m2
4 2.5 0.28 2.8 m2
4 3.2 0.28 3.6 m2
185
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
2
4 19.2 0.28 21.5 m
Phytorid Bed 4 27.73 0.28 31.1 m2
4 69.2 0.28 77.5 m2
4 8.7 0.28 9.7 m2
Total Qty 242.8 m2 186 45,236
Pg.84
Item No 7
wall (any thickness), including
attached pilasters, buttresses, plinth
and string courses, fillets, columns,
pillars, piers, abutments, posts and
struts, etc. upto floor five level
excluding cost of centring,
shuttering, finishing and
reinforcement for 1:1:5:3 (1 cement:
1.5 coarse sand:3 graded stone
aggregate 20mm nominal size)
RCC M-20
a) Vertical walls
Intake Well 2 16.1 0.25 2.8 22.5 m3
2 13.5 0.25 2.8 18.9 m3
Screen chamber 2 4.6 0.25 2.3 5.3 m3
2 2.3 0.25 2.3 2.6 m3
Oil and Grease Chamber 2 7.9 0.25 2.4 9.5 m3
2 3.00 0.25 2.4 3.6 m3
Primary Settler 4 24.63 0.25 3.3 81.3 m3
1 19.00 0.25 3.3 15.7 m3
1 69.00 0.25 3.3 56.9 m3
Phytorid Bed 12 25.33 0.25 2.8 212.8 m3
1 69 0.25 2.8 48.3 m3
Phytorid Bed Lauder 1 69 0.20 2.3 31.7 m3
2 0.8 0.25 2.8 1.1 m3
186
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
3
Phytorid Bed Lauder (Outlet) 2 0.8 0.25 2.8 1.1 m
1 69 0.25 2.8 48.3 m3
Treated Water Tank 2 15.8 0.25 3.3 26.1 m3
2 8.5 0.25 3.3 14.0 m3
Total 599.86 m3
b) Baffles
For Primary settler 9 6 0.15 1.98 16.038 m3
12 6 0.15 1.98 21.384 m3
For Phytorid bed 33 6 0.15 1.68 49.896 m3
44 6 0.15 1.68 66.528 m3
For Oil & Grease Trap 1 2.5 0.15 2.20 0.825 m3
1 6.77 0.15 0.97 0.985 m3
Total 155.7 m3
Total walls 755.5 m3
c) Top Slab
Intake Well 1 16.58 13.50 0.15 33.6 m3
Settler Tank 1 25.13 19.00 0.15 71.6 m3
Total 105.19 m3
Estimate Manholes
Intake Well 5 0.6 0.45 0.15 0.2025 m3
Settler Tank 9 0.6 0.45 0.15 0.3645 m3
Deduct manhole from top slab 17 0.6885 m3
Net
104.5 m3
Qty
Total Qty of Slab and Vertical wall
860.0 m3 5723 49,22,118
and Baffles
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.
5.2/5.2.2, Pg.83
d)Beams & Column
For Plant (25% of item no 6 and item
412.4 m3 5723 23,60,310
no 7 (a) and (c)
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.
5.2/5.2.2, Pg.83
TOTAL
Total RCC Qty 2062.0 m3
RCC
187
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Item No 7.1
or form work for
a) Vertical walls
Intake Well 4 16.1 2.8 180.1 m2
4 13.5 2.8 151.2 m2
4 2.3 2.3 21.2 m2
4 3.00 2.4 28.8 m2
2 19.0 3.3 125.4 m2
2 69.0 3.3 455.4 m2
Phytorid Bed 24 25.33 2.8 1702.4 m2
2 69 2.8 386.4 m2
Phytorid Bed Lauder 2 69 2.3 317.4 m2
4 0.8 2.8 9.0 m2
Phytorid Bed Lauder (Outlet) 4 0.8 2.8 9.0 m2
2 69 2.8 386.4 m2
4 8.5 3.3 112.2 m2
TOTAL 4862.4 m2 321 15,62,274
Pg.84
b) Baffles
For Primary settler 18 6 1.98 213.8 m2
24 6 1.98 285.1 m2
For Phytorid bed 66 6 1.68 665.3 m2
88 6 1.68 887.0 m2
For Oil & Grease Trap 2 2.5 2.20 11.0 m2
2 6.77 0.97 13.1 m2
TOTAL 2075.4 m2 321 6,66,828
Pg.84
c) Top Slab
Intake Well 1 16.58 13.5 223.8 m2
2 16.58 0.15 5.0 m2
188
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
2
2 13.50 0.15 4.1 m
Settler Tank 1 25.13 19.0 477.5 m2
2 25.13 0.15 7.5 m2
2 19.0 0.15 5.7 m2
Total 723.5 m2 363 2,62,346
Pg.84
Item No 8
Reinforcement for R.C.C. work
including straightening, cutting,
bending, placing in position and
binding all complete
2062.0
Total Qty of concrete Cum
2
TMT at 110Kg/cum 226.8 MT 75 17,057
no.5.22,5.22.7C Pg.86
Item No 9
Cement plaster in course sand; 12
mm cement plaster of mix: 1:4 (1
cement : 4 coarse sand)
a) Internal Plaster
intake well 2 16.1 2.8 90.0 m2
2 13 2.8 72.8 m2
2 16.1 13 418.0 m2
for screen chamber 2 4.6 2.3 21.2 m2
2 1.8 2.3 8.3 m2
1 4.6 1.8 8.3 m2
For Oil and Grease Chamber 2 7.9 2.4 38.0 m2
2 2.5 2.4 12.0 m2
1 7.9 2.5 19.8 m2
For Primary settler 6 24.6 3.3 487.7 m2
6 6 3.3 118.8 m2
3 24.6 6 443.3 m2
For Phytorid bed 22 25.33 2.8 1560.5 m2
22 6.0 2.8 369.6 m2
11 25.33 6 1672.0 m2
189
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
2
Phytorid Bed Lauder 2 0.8 2.8 4.5 m
1 68.5 2.3 157.6 m2
1 68.5 3.30 226.1 m2
1 0.8 68.5 54.8 m2
2 68.5 2.8 383.6 m2
1 0.8 68.5 54.8 m2
For treated water tank 2 8 3.3 52.8 m2
2 15.8 3.3 104.5 m2
2 15.8 8 253.3 m2
Baffles (Settler) 18 6.0 1.98 213.8 m2
24 6.0 1.98 285.1 m2
Baffles (Phytorid) 66 6.0 1.68 665.3 m2
88 6.0 1.68 887.0 m2
Baffles (Oil & Grease) 2 2.5 2.20 11.0 m2
2 6.8 0.97 13.1 m2
Total 8712.1 m2 140 12,18,826
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no. 13.11.2, Page

No. 167
Item No 10
Rough cast plaster upto 10m high
above ground level with a mixture of
sand and gravel or crushed stone
from 6 mm to 10 mm nominal size
dashed over and including the fresh
plaster in two layers, under layer 12
mm cement plaster 1:4 (1 cement :4
coarse sand) and top layer 10 mm
cement plaster 1:3 (1 cement :3
course sand) mixed with 10% finely
grounded hydrated lime by volume
of cement: Ordinary cement finish
using ordinary cement
External cement plaster
intake well 2 16.58 2.8 92.83 m2
2 13.5 2.8 75.60 m2
190
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
2
1 16.58 13.5 223.79 m
For Screen Chamber 2 5.11 2.3 23.5 m2
2 2.30 2.3 10.6 m2
2 3.00 2.4 14.4 m2
1 19.0 3.3 62.7 m2
1 25.13 19.0 477.5 m2
1 50.0 3.3 165.0 m2
1 69.0 2.8 193.2 m2
For treated water tank 2 16.33 3.3 107.8 m2
1 8.5 3.3 28.1 m2
1 16.33 8.5 138.8 m2
Total 1974.5 m2 360 7,10,028
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no 13.30.1,
Page No. 168
Item No 11
Providing and laying damp-proof
Course 50 mm thick with cement
concrete 1:2:4 (1cement :2 coarse
sand :4 graded stone aggregate
20mm nominal size)
intake well 2 16.1 2.8 90.0 m3
2 13.0 2.8 72.8 m3
2 16.1 13.0 418.0 m3
2 1.8 2.3 8.3 m3
1 4.6 1.8 8.3 m3
2 2.5 2.4 12.0 m3
1 7.9 2.5 19.8 m3
6 6.0 3.3 118.8 m3
3 24.6 6 443.3 m3
191
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
3
22 6.0 2.8 369.6 m
11 25.3 6 1672.0 m3
Phytorid Bed Lauder 2 0.8 2.8 4.5 m3
1 68.5 2.3 157.6 m3
1 68.5 3.30 226.1 m3
1 0.8 68.5 54.8 m3
2 68.5 2.8 383.6 m3
1 0.8 68.5 54.8 m3
2 15.8 3.3 104.5 m3
2 15.8 8 253.3 m3
Total 6636.7 m3 246 16,29,314
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no 4.11,
Page No. 80
Item No 12
Providing and fixing on wall face
unplastidsed PVC (working pressure
4 kgf per sqm) rain water pipes
conforming to IS: 1985 including
jointing with seal ring conforming to
IS: 5382 leaving 10 mm gap for
thermal expansion
110 mm diameter 4 kgf/cm2 pipes 100 Rmt 238.00 23,800
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no 12.78,
Page No. 159
Item No 13
Supplying & Spreading crusher
broken of following sizes. of trap /
granite / quartzite / gneiss stone
metal at the road side including
conveying and stacking .
Total media as per Phytorid bed 4598 4598 m3
a) 20 mm Stone Metal 30 % of total media 1379.4 m3 556 7,67,402
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no0295,
Page No. 7
b) 40 mm Stone Metal 35 % of total media 1609.3 m3 445 7,16,493
192
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no 0293,
Page No. 7
c) 60 mm Stone Metal 35 % of total media 1609.3 m3 432 6,94,687
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no 0291,
Page No. 7
Item No 14
Providing and fixing in position pre-
cast R.C.C. manhole cover and frame
of required shape and approved
quality
Rectangular Shape 600*450 mm
17 0.6 0.45 0.11 3963.5 Nos 1087 43,06,701
internal dimensions
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code No.
19.19.1.1, Page No. 245
Item No 15
Filling available excavated earth
(excluding rock) in trenches, plinth,
sides of foundations etc. in layers
not exceeding 20 cm in depth:
consolidating each deposited layer
by ramming and watering lead
Total excavation 6961.5 m3
Deductions m3
Soling 578.8 m3
PCC 285.7 m3
RAFT 789.6 m3
intake well 1 16.58 13.5 2.95 660.2 m3
screen chamber 1 5.11 2.3 0.0 0.0 m3
settler tank 1 24.9 12.75 1.8 571.0 m3
Phytorid tank 1 27.9 69 1.4 2693.5 m3
treated water tank 1 16.33 8.5 2.1 291.6 m3
Total deduction 5870.3 m3
Net qty 1091.2 m3
Back Filling 1091 m3 185.30 2,02,203
Ref: BCD SOR 2018-19, Code no
2.27, Page No. 75;Ref: BCD SOR
193
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
2018-19, Code no 2.27.1, Page No.
75
Item No 16
Dewatering the excavated trenches
and pools of water in the building
trenches / pipeline trenches, well
works by using pumps and other
bHp
devices including disposing off water 500 26 13,060
hr
to safe distance as directed by
Engineer-in-charge (including cost of
machinery, labour, fuel), etc.
complete.
Market Rate
Subtotal (A) 2,82,95,963
Add for Structural design and
Detailed drawing preparation (1.5% 1.50% 4,24,439
of A)
Sub-total (B) 2,87,20,403
1% for contingencies Rs 2,87,204
Actual-cost (C) 2,90,07,607
194
CSIR-NEERI
Estimation of Electromechanical Supplies for 1.9 MLD Phytorid Plant

Sr. Total Cost
No (Rs)
1 Bio-Culture - 475 ltr 3182500
2 Plantation - 1900.0 sqm 760000
Manual Screen
Coarse Screen & Fine Screen-Use standard
3 (1W-Fine and 1W- 2 Nos 324480
material: Mesh size 20 mm
Coarse)
Supply, installation, testing & commissioning of
Sewage Sewage Submersible Pump, Make- Kirloskar
4 Submersible /equivalent,Flow-1181 LPM,Head-12 m, Pump 2 Nos 187200
Pump(1W + 1S) Power(kW/Hp)-5.5/7.5,Three Phase Power
supply, Partial Handling-35 mm, MOC-All CI
Pressure Sand
5 Pressure Sand Filter, Vessel Size-1400mm X 1500 2 Set 374400
Filter (2W)
hos, top distribution and bottom drum collection
Filter Feed Pump Filter Feed Pump, Make- Kirloskar/equivalent,
6 3 Nos 112320
(2W+ 1S) ,Flow-21.9LPS,Head-12 m, Pump Power(kW/Hp)-
3.7/5.0,Three Phase Power supply,
Activated Carbon
Filter (2W)
HOS, top distribution and bottom drum collection
Chlorination System, Dosing Tank:-Make-Sintex,
Tank Capa.-500 Ltr, Tank MOC-LDPE, Dosing
Chlorination Pump:- Make-MRIPL(ACCUDYNE), A92,Type-
8 1 Set 109824
System Electronically Actuated Diaphragm Pump,Flow-0
to 6 LPH, Max. Pressure-3.5 Kg/Cm2, Coil Rating-
40 watt,IP Supply-230V,50 Hz,1 Phase,
Controlling: Manually (0-100%)
Supply Installation Testing & Commissioning of
Cabling (Only For Electro-Mechanicals units
within the STP internal parts) Cabling includes
10 Cabling and Piping POLYCAB/ Finoles / Havels cables & Flexible cable 1 L/s 274560
With galvanized cable tray & cover along with
required supports and tagging. and all internal
piping within plant area
11 Control Panel 1 job 211200
Control Panel for online monitoring
Total Amount 59,98,244
195
CSIR-NEERI
25.4.3 STP 3 – Phytorid (1.1 MLD)
Sr. Length Width Depth Free Beds wall

Tanks
No. (m) (m) (m) Board (nos) thickness
1 Intake well 20.17 6 2.5 0.3 1 0.25
2 Fine Screen Chamber 3.7 1.8 1.5 0.2 1 0.25
Oil and Grease
3 5.0 2.5 2 0.2 1 0.25
Chamber
4 Settler Tank 21.4 6 3 0.3 2 0.25
5 Phytorid Bed 23.05 6 2.5 0.3 7 0.25
6 treated Water Tank 12.2 6 3 0.3 1 0.25
Measurement Sheet and Bill of Quantities for 1.1 MLD

L W D Rate Amount
Item of work No Qty Unit
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Item No 1
exceeding 15 cm deep and disposal of
intake well 22.67 8.5 192.7 m2
For screen chamber 6.23 4.3 26.8 m2
For Oil & Grease Trap 7.54 5 37.7 m2
For Primary settler 23.89 14.75 352.4 m2
For Phytorid bed 26.35 46 1212.0 m2
For treated water tank 14.72 8.5 125.1 m2
Total Qty 1946.7 m2 11.3 21,939
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.2.29/2.29.1,
Pg.75
Item No 2
trenches or drains (not exceeding 1.5 m in
width or 10 sqm on plan) including dressing of
sides and ramming of bottoms, lift upto 1.5 m.
including getting out the excavated soil and
disposal of surplus excavated soil as directed,
Lift 0.00 to 1.50 m
intake well 22.67 8.5 1.5 289.0 m3
196
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
For screen chamber 6.23 4.3 0.58 15.5 m3
For Oil & Grease Trap 7.54 5.00 0.6 21.9 m3
For Primary settler 23.89 14.75 1.5 528.5 m3
Total Qty 2860.7 m3 320 9,14,266
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.2.8/2.8.1 Pg.75
Item No 3
trenches or drains (not exceeding 1.5 m in
width or 10 sqm on plan) including dressing of
sides and ramming of bottoms, lift upto 1.5 m.
including getting out the excavated soil and
disposal of surplus excavated soil as directed,
Lift 1.5 to 3.0 m and beyond
intake well 22.67 8.5 2.03 391.1 m3
For screen chamber 6.23 4.3 0 0.0 m3
For Oil & Grease Trap 7.54 5 0 0.0 m3
For Primary settler 23.89 14.75 0.88 310.1 m3
Total
1430.6 m3 446 6,37,623
Qty
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.2.11, Pg.75
Item No 4
boulders of size range 5cm to 20 cm, in
recharge pit, in the required thickness, for all
leads & lifts, all complete as per direction of
Engineer-in-charge
Intake Well 21.27 7.1 0.2 30.2 m3
Phytorid Bed 25.65 44.6 0.2 228.8 m3
197
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Total Qty 345.2 m3 959 3,31,013
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.24.5, Pg.266
Item No 5
concrete of specified grade excluding the cost
of centring and shuttering-all work upto plinth
level.
PCC M 150
Intake Well 21.07 6.9 0.1 14.5 m3
Phytorid Bed 25.55 44.4 0.1 113.4 m3
Total Qty 169.6 m3 4151 7,04,091
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.4.1.3, Pg.79
Item No 5.1
Centring and shuttering including strutting,
propping etc. and removal or form work for
PCC M 150
Intake Well 4 21.07 0.1 8.4 m2
4 6.9 0.1 2.8 m2
4 2.7 0.1 1.1 m2
4 3.4 0.1 1.4 m2
4 13.15 0.1 5.3 m2
Phytorid Bed 4 25.55 0.1 10.2 m2
4 44.4 0.1 17.8 m2
4 6.9 0.1 2.8 m2
TOTAL 68.0 m2 186 12,645
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no. 4.3.1 Pg.79
198
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Item No 6
Providing and laying in position specified
grade of reinforced cement concrete
excluding the cost of centring, shuttering
,finishing and reinforcement-All work upto
plinth level; 1:1:5:3 (1 cement: 1.5 coarse
sand:3 graded stone aggregate
20 mm nominal size)
for raft slab M20
Intake Well 20.87 6.7 0.28 39.1 m3
Phytorid Bed 25.45 44.2 0.28 314.9 m3
Total
466.7 m3 4902 22,87,760
Qty
Ref:- BCD SOR 18, Code no.5.1/5.1.2 Pg.83
Item No 6.1
for raft slab M20
Intake Well 4 20.87 0.28 23.4 m2
4 6.7 0.28 7.5 m2
4 2.5 0.28 2.8 m2
4 3.2 0.28 3.6 m2
4 12.95 0.28 14.5 m2
Phytorid Bed 4 25.45 0.28 28.5 m2
4 44.2 0.28 49.5 m2
4 6.7 0.28 7.5 m2
TOTAL 187.9 m2 186 35,002
199
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Item No 7
thickness), including attached pilasters,
buttresses, plinth and string courses, fillets,
columns, pillars, piers, abutments, posts and
struts, etc. upto floor five level excluding cost
of centring, shuttering, finishing and
reinforcement for 1:1:5:3 (1 cement: 1.5
coarse sand:3 graded stone aggregate 20mm
nominal size)
RCC M-20
a) Vertical walls
Intake Well 2 20.2 0.25 2.8 28.2 m3
2 6.5 0.25 2.8 9.1 m3
Screen chamber 2 3.7 0.25 1.7 3.2 m3
2 2.3 0.25 1.7 2.0 m3
2 3.00 0.25 2.2 3.3 m3
Primary Settler 3 21.39 0.25 3.3 52.9 m3
1 12.75 0.25 3.3 10.5 m3
1 44.00 0.25 3.3 36.3 m3
Phytorid Bed 8 23.05 0.25 2.8 129.1 m3
1 44 0.25 2.8 30.8 m3
Phytorid Bed Lauder 1 44 0.20 2.3 20.2 m3
2 0.8 0.25 2.8 1.1 m3
Phytorid Bed Lauder (Outlet) 2 0.8 0.25 2.8 1.1 m3
1 44 0.25 2.8 30.8 m3
2 6.5 0.25 3.3 10.7 m3
Total 395.10 m3
b) Baffles
For Primary settler 6 6 0.15 1.98 10.692 m3
8 6 0.15 1.98 14.256 m3
For Phytorid bed 21 6 0.15 1.68 31.752 m3
200
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
28 6 0.15 1.68 42.336 m3
For Oil & Grease Trap 1 2.5 0.15 1.90 0.7125 m3
1 3.89 0.15 0.75 0.438 m3
Total 100.2 m3
Total walls 495.3 m3
c) Top Slab
Intake Well 1 20.67 6.50 0.15 20.2 m3
Settler Tank 1 21.89 12.75 0.15 41.9 m3
Total 62.01 m3
Estimate Manholes
Intake Well 4 0.6 0.45 0.15 0.162 m3
Settler Tank 6 0.6 0.45 0.15 0.243 m3
Deduct manhole from top slab 13 0.5265 m3
Net Qty 61.5 m3
Total Qty of Slab and Vertical wall and Baffles 556.8 m3 5723 31,86,593
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no. 5.2/5.2.2, Pg.83
d)Beams & Column
For Plant (25% of item no 6 and item no 7 (a)
255.9 m3 5723 14,64,372
and (c)
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no. 5.2/5.2.2, Pg.83
Total RCC Qty TOTAL RCC 1279.3 m3
Item No 7.1
a) Vertical walls
Intake Well 4 20.2 2.8 225.9 m2
4 6.5 2.8 72.8 m2
4 2.3 1.7 15.6 m2
4 3.00 2.2 26.4 m2
2 12.75 3.3 84.2 m2
2 44.00 3.3 290.4 m2
201
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Phytorid Bed 16 23.05 2.8 1032.5 m2
2 44 2.8 246.4 m2
Phytorid Bed Lauder 2 44 2.3 202.4 m2
4 0.8 2.8 9.0 m2
2 44 2.8 246.4 m2
4 6.5 3.3 85.8 m2
TOTAL 3201.3 m2 321 10,28,579
b) Baffles
For Primary settler 12 6 1.98 142.6 m2
16 6 1.98 190.1 m2
For Phytorid bed 42 6 1.68 423.4 m2
56 6 1.68 564.5 m2
For Oil & Grease Trap 2 2.5 1.90 9.5 m2
2 3.89 0.75 5.8 m2
TOTAL 1335.8 m2 321 4,29,198
c) Top Slab
Intake Well 1 20.67 6.50 134.3 m2
2 20.67 0.15 6.2 m2
2 6.50 0.15 2.0 m2
Settler Tank 1 21.89 12.75 279.1 m2
2 21.89 0.15 6.6 m2
2 12.75 0.15 3.8 m2
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no. 5.9.3 Pg.84 Total 432.0 m2 363 1,56,628
Item No 8
straightening, cutting, bending, placing in
position and binding all complete
Total Qty of concrete 1279.3 m3
TMT at 110Kg/cum 140.7 MT 75 10,582
Ref:- BCD SOR 2018, Code no.5.22,5.22.7C
Pg.86
202
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Item No 9
Cement plaster in course sand; 12 mm
cement plaster of mix: 1:4 (1 cement : 4
coarse sand)
a) Internal Plaster
intake well 2 20.2 2.8 112.9 m2
2 6 2.8 33.6 m2
2 20.2 6 242.0 m2
2 1.8 1.7 6.1 m2
1 3.7 1.8 6.7 m2
For Oil and Grease Chamber 2 5.0 2.2 22.2 m2
2 2.5 2.2 11.0 m2
1 5.0 2.5 12.6 m2
4 6 3.3 79.2 m2
2 21.4 6 256.7 m2
14 6.0 2.8 235.2 m2
7 23.05 6 968.0 m2
1 43.50 2.3 100.1 m2
1 43.5 3.30 143.6 m2
1 0.8 43.50 34.8 m2
2 43.50 2.8 243.6 m2
1 0.8 43.50 34.8 m2
For treated water tank 2 6 3.3 39.6 m2
2 12.2 3.3 80.7 m2
2 12.2 6 146.7 m2
Baffles (Settler) 12 6.0 1.98 142.6 m2
16 6.0 1.98 190.1 m2
Baffles (Phytorid) 42 6.0 1.68 423.4 m2
56 6.0 1.68 564.5 m2
Baffles (Oil & Grease) 2 2.5 1.90 9.5 m2
203
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
2 3.9 0.75 5.8 m2
Total 5353.2 m2 140 7,48,918
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no. 13.11.2, Page
No. 167
Item No 10
Rough cast plaster upto 10m high above
ground level with a mixture of sand and gravel
or crushed stone from 6 mm to 10 mm
nominal size dashed over and including the
fresh plaster in two layers, under layer 12 mm
cement plaster 1:4(1 cement :4 coarse sand)
and top layer 10 mm cement plaster 1:3 (1
cement :3 course sand) mixed with 10% finely
grounded hydrated lime by volume of
cement: Ordinary cement finish using
ordinary cement
External cement plaster
intake well 2 20.67 2.8 115.73 m2
2 6.50 2.8 36.40 m2
1 20.67 6.50 134.33 m2
For Screen Chamber 2 4.23 1.7 14.4 m2
2 2.30 1.7 7.8 m2
2 3.00 2.2 13.2 m2
1 12.75 3.3 42.1 m2
1 21.89 12.75 279.1 m2
1 31.25 3.3 103.1 m2
1 44.00 2.8 123.2 m2
1 6.5 3.3 21.5 m2
1 12.72 6.5 82.7 m2
Total 1368.0 m2 360 4,91,942
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no 13.30.1, Page No.
168
204
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Item No 11
Providing and laying damp-proof Course 50
mm thick with cement concrete 1:2:4
(1cement :2 coarse sand :4 graded stone
aggregate 20mm nominal size)
intake well 2 20.2 2.8 112.9 m3
2 6.0 2.8 33.6 m3
2 20.2 6.0 242.0 m3
2 1.8 1.7 6.1 m3
1 3.7 1.8 6.7 m3
2 2.5 2.2 11.0 m3
1 5.0 2.5 12.6 m3
4 6.0 3.3 79.2 m3
2 21.4 6 256.7 m3
14 6.0 2.8 235.2 m3
7 23.0 6 968.0 m3
1 43.50 2.3 100.1 m3
1 43.50 3.30 143.6 m3
1 0.8 43.50 34.8 m3
2 43.50 2.8 243.6 m3
1 0.8 43.50 34.8 m3
2 12.2 3.3 80.7 m3
2 12.2 6 146.7 m3
Total 4017.4 m3 246 9,86,277
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no 4.11, Page No. 80
Item No 12
Providing and fixing on wall face unplastisized
PVC (working pressure 4 kgf per sqm) rain
205
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
water pipes conforming to IS: 1985 including
jointing with seal ring conforming to IS: 5382
leaving 10 mm gap for thermal expansion
110 mm diameter 4 kgf/cm2 pipes 100 Rmt 238.0 23,800
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no 12.78, Page No.
159
Item No 13
Supplying & Spreading crusher broken of
following sizes. of trap / granite / quartzite /
gneiss stone metal at the road side including
conveying and stacking .
Total media as per Phytorid bed 2662 2662 m3
30 % of total
a) 20 mm Stone Metal 798.6 m3 556 4,44,285
media
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no0295, Page No. 7
35 % of total
b) 40 mm Stone Metal 931.7 m3 445 4,14,811
media
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no 0293, Page No. 7
35 % of total
c) 60 mm Stone Metal 931.7 Cum 432 4,02,187
media
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code no 0291, Page No. 7
Item No 14
Providing and fixing in position pre-cast R.C.C.
manhole cover and frame of required shape
and approved quality
Rectangular Shape 600*450 mm internal
13 0.6 0.45 0.11 3030.9 Nos 1087 32,93,360
dimensions
Ref: BCD SOR 2018, Code No. 19.19.1.1, Page
No. 245
Item No 15
Filling available excavated earth (excluding
rock) in trenches, plinth, sides of foundations
etc. in layers not exceeding 20 cm in depth:
consolidating each deposited layer by
ramming and watering lead
Total excavation 4291.3 m3
Deductions
206
CSIR-NEERI

L W D Rate Amount
(m) (m) (m) (Rs) (Rs)
Soling 345.2 m3
PCC 169.6 m3
RAFT 466.7 m3
intake well 1 20.67 6.5 2.95 396.3 m3
screen chamber 1 4.23 2.3 0.0 0.0 m3
settler tank 1 21.64 12.75 1.8 496.6 m3
Phytorid tank 1 25.60 44 1.4 1576.8 m3
treated water tank 1 12.72 6.5 2.1 173.7 m3
Total deduction 3624.8 m3
Net qty 666.5 m3
Back Filling 666 m3 185.3 1,23,495
Ref: BCD SOR 2018-19, Code no 2.27, Page
No. 75;Ref: BCD SOR 2018-19, Code no
2.27.1, Page No. 75
Item No 16
Dewatering the excavated trenches and pools
of water in the building trenches / pipeline
trenches, well works by using pumps and
bHp
other devices including disposing off water to 500 26.12 13,060
hr
safe distance as directed by Engineer-in-
charge (including cost of machinery, labour,
fuel), etc. complete.
Subtotal (A) 181,62,426
Add for Structural design and Detailed
1.50% 272436
drawing preparation (1.5% of A)
Sub-total (B) 184,34,863
1% for contingencies Rs 1,84,349
Actual-cost (C) 186,19,211
207
CSIR-NEERI
Estimation of Electromechanical Supplies for 1.1 MLD Phytorid Plant

Sr. Total Cost
No (Rs)
1 Bio-Culture - 275 ltr 1842500
2 Plantation - 1100 sqm 440000
Manual Screen Coarse Screen & Fine Screen-Use standard
3 (1W-Fine and material 2 Nos 124800
1W-Coarse) Mesh size 20 mm
Sewage Sewage Submersible Pump, Make-
4 Submersible Kirloskar/equivalent, Flow-764 LPM,Head-16 m, 2 Nos 187200
Pump(1W + 1S) Pump Power(kW/Hp)-5.5/7.5,Three Phase Power
supply, Partial Handling-35 mm, MOC-All CI
Pressure Sand
Filter (1W)
HOS, Top Distribution And Bottom Drum Collection,
Filter Feed Pump Filter Feed Pump, Make- Kirloskar/equivalent,
6 2 Nos 54912
(1W+ 1S) ,Flow-12.4 LPS,Head-12 m, Pump Power(kW/Hp)-
2.2/3,Three Phase Power supply,
Activated Carbon
Filter (1W)
HOS, Top Distribution And Bottom Drum Collection
Chlorination System, Dosing Tank:-Make-Sintex,
Tank Capa.-500 Ltr, Tank MOC-LDPE, Dosing Pump:-
Chlorination Make-MRIPL(ACCUDYNE), A92,Type-Electronically
8 1 Set 109824
System Actuated Diaphragm Pump,Flow-0 to 6 LPH, Max.
Pressure-3.5 Kg/Cm2, Coil Rating-40 watt, IP
Supply-230V, 50 Hz,1 Phase, Controlling: Manually
(0-100%)
Supply Installation Testing & Commissioning of
Cabling (Only For Electro-Mechanicals units within
the STP internal parts) Cabling includes POLYCAB/
Cabling and
10 Finoles / Havels cables & Flexible cable With 1 L/s 124800
Piping
galvanized cable tray & cover along with required
supports and tagging and all internal piping within
plant area.
11 Control Panel 1 job 142560
Control Panel for online monitoring
Total Amount 39,13,924
208
CSIR-NEERI
25.5 Operation and Maintenance Cost for 15 Years
25.5.1 STP 1 – SBR (8.9 MLD)
Cost GST Total Cost

Sr. No Components
(In Rs) (18%) (In Rs)
Manpower (3 non technical+ 2
1 5,76,000
technical) (Rs./year)
Hypo Chlorine Cost for Chlorine
2 40,28,140
dosing annually (Rs./year)
3 Poly Dosing (Per Year) 20,30,313
4 Electricity Charges/year 48,90,423
Sludge & screened material disposal
5 1,10,000
cost
Repair/AMC of Electromechanical
6 29,88,620
(10% of EM), (Rs./year)
Administrative Overheads,
7 7,59,276
(Rs./year)
Total O&M Including electricity &
8 1,53,82,772
excluding Tax
Total Annual O&M
For 1st Year, 1,53,82,772 27,68,899 1,81,51,671
For 2nd Year, 1,61,51,911 29,07,344 1,90,59,255
For 3nd Year, 1,69,59,506 30,52,711 2,00,12,217
For 4th Year, 1,78,07,482 32,05,347 2,10,12,828
For 5th Year, 1,86,97,856 33,65,614 2,20,63,470
For 6th Year, 1,96,32,748 35,33,895 2,31,66,643
For 7th Year, 2,06,14,386 37,10,589 2,43,24,975
For 8th Year, 2,16,45,105 38,96,119 2,55,41,224
For 9th Year, 2,27,27,360 40,90,925 2,68,18,285
For 10th Year, 2,38,63,728 42,95,471 2,81,59,199
For 11th Year, 2,50,56,915 45,10,245 2,95,67,159
For 12th Year, 2,63,09,761 47,35,757 3,10,45,517
For 13th Year, 2,76,25,249 49,72,545 3,25,97,793
For 14th Year, 2,90,06,511 52,21,172 3,42,27,683
For 15th Year, 3,04,56,837 54,82,231 3,59,39,067
Total O&M for 15 Years including
39,16,86,988
Tax & Electricity
209
CSIR-NEERI
Cost GST Total Cost

Sr. No Components
(In Rs) (18%) (In Rs)
1 2,40,000
2 8,59,940
4 1,10,000
cost
5 2,05,574
6 1,30,551
(Rs./year)
7 20,17,208
excluding Tax
Total Annual O&M
For 1st Year, 20,17,208 3,63,097 23,80,305
For 2nd Year, 21,18,068 3,81,252 24,99,321
For 3nd Year, 22,23,972 4,00,315 26,24,287
For 4th Year, 23,35,170 4,20,331 27,55,501
For 5th Year, 24,51,929 4,41,347 28,93,276
For 6th Year, 25,74,525 4,63,415 30,37,940
For 7th Year, 27,03,251 4,86,585 31,89,837
For 8th Year, 28,38,414 5,10,915 33,49,329
For 9th Year, 29,80,335 5,36,460 35,16,795
For 10th Year, 31,29,351 5,63,283 36,92,635
For 11th Year, 32,85,819 5,91,447 38,77,266
For 12th Year, 34,50,110 6,21,020 40,71,130
For 13th Year, 36,22,615 6,52,071 42,74,686
For 14th Year, 38,03,746 6,84,674 44,88,421
For 15th Year, 39,93,934 7,18,908 47,12,842
5,13,63,568
Tax & Electricity
210
CSIR-NEERI
Cost GST Total Cost

Sr. No Components
(In Rs) (18%) (In Rs)
1 2,40,000
2 4,97,860
4 1,10,000
cost
5 1,63,142
6 90,100
(Rs./year)
7 14,39,385
excluding Tax
Total Annual O&M
For 1st Year, 14,39,385 2,59,089 16,98,474
For 2nd Year, 15,11,354 2,72,044 17,83,398
For 3nd Year, 15,86,922 2,85,646 18,72,567
For 4th Year, 16,66,268 2,99,928 19,66,196
For 5th Year, 17,49,581 3,14,925 20,64,506
For 6th Year, 18,37,060 3,30,671 21,67,731
For 7th Year, 19,28,913 3,47,204 22,76,117
For 8th Year, 20,25,359 3,64,565 23,89,923
For 9th Year, 21,26,627 3,82,793 25,09,419
For 10th Year, 22,32,958 4,01,932 26,34,890
For 11th Year, 23,44,606 4,22,029 27,66,635
For 12th Year, 24,61,836 4,43,131 29,04,967
For 13th Year, 25,84,928 4,65,287 30,50,215
For 14th Year, 27,14,174 4,88,551 32,02,726
For 15th Year, 28,49,883 5,12,979 33,62,862
3,66,50,627
Tax & Electricity
211
CSIR-NEERI
26 Environmental Management Plan
The Environmental management plan is mandatorily required for the implementation phase
as well as during the operation phase of the project. This chapter describes how the action of
implementation and operation phase may affect the existing environment and what are the
mitigation measures that shall be undertaken to avoid, minimize or manage the impacts so
that they are environmentally acceptable.
26.1 Baseline Environmental Conditions- Supaul
Following parameters are analyzed and evaluated to assess the impact of the project on
environment
 Land Use/ Land Cover
 Transportation
 Raw Water Source
 Sewerage System
 Air Quality
 Noise Levels
26.1.1 Land Use/ Land Cover
Based on the land use/ land cover pattern derived from the remote sensing satellite
imagery, the major portion of the town is cropland i.e., about 62.42%, whereas the urban
area is only 14.45%.
26.1.2 Transportation
The town is well connected by various National and State Highways. Also a railway line
passes through the district.
26.1.3 Raw Water Source
There is no dedicated water supply scheme for the town, hence the major source of water
consumption is the available ground water through wet wells and bore wells.
212
CSIR-NEERI
26.1.4 Sewerage System
The town does not have any proper sewerage network; however, at some parts of the town
storm water drains are available. The sewage generated by the town is discharged into the
tributaries of Ganga by numerous nallahs.
26.1.5 Air Quality
No major source of air pollution was identified during the site visit.
26.1.6 Noise Levels
The noise levels were remained pleasant and did not draw any attention during site visit.
26.2 Potential Environmental Impacts
The implementation of interceptor and diversion sewers followed by STP may influence the
existing social and environmental conditions during construction and operation phase. The
potential impacts expected during the construction as well as in operational phase are
briefed below.
26.2.1 Construction Phase
The possible impacts anticipated during construction phase shall be on water, noise, air
quality, safety/health of staffs / labors etc., The Water quality impacts during construction
shall be of the surface runoff, and the sewage generated if discharged untreated. The
impacts on air quality during construction phase shall be from clearing/ excavation of land,
handling and transportation of construction materials as well as demolition wastes, wind
erosion of open stored materials and stock areas etc., the noise quality shall get impacted
due to the movement and operation of construction vehicles and from DG sets when
utilized. The movement of vehicles carrying construction materials shall also affect the
surrounding local pubic resulting in traffic to an extent. The positive impact of the
construction phase shall be direct and indirect job opportunities including employment of
local people etc.,
213
CSIR-NEERI
26.2.2 Operation Phase
Unlike construction phase, the operation phase shall mostly have positive impacts. In worst-
case scenario, certain parameters may have minor impacts. However, if the operation and
maintenance activities are not followed dedicatedly, there shall be some serious impacts in
operation. The intake of sewage beyond the STP's design volumetric load shall result in
overflow tanks, which may create odor nuisance and health impacts to the surrounding
public. This may also affect the performance of the STP and might disturb the process due to
shock loads. Additional care should be taken by concerned bodies to avoid discharge of
industrial effluents (including small scale or processing industries) into the sewers that lead
in to the STP. Regular induction and training sessions shall be organized by the
management for the staffs and labors of the plant for following clean and hygienic habits
that ensure health and avoid falling ill due to pathogen contacts etc.,
On the brighter side, the positive impacts of the operation phase are improved river water
quality of the River Ganga and its tributaries. The improved sanitary condition shall result in
reduction of water borne diseases, which further results in improved quality of a healthy
lifestyle of people. There shall also be long term direct as well as indirect job opportunities
during the operational phase of the treatment plants.
26.3 Mitigation Measures
The possible mitigation measures to be followed which nullifies or manages the impacts for
various activities involved in the construction phase are tabulated in the below Table- 41
and similarly the possible mitigation measures for the operational phase in the following
Table - 42.
Table 41 Mitigation Measures for Construction Phase
Sr. No Activity Parameter Mitigation Measures

01 Site Property Rights  Identification of ownership
Investigation  Obtaining Owners Consent prior to
access
 Intimation to owner of all upcoming
activities, time frame & work
completion schedule and any possible
site damages
214
CSIR-NEERI

02 Acquisition of Common Public or Govt  Approved Land Acquisition Framework
Land Land or Plan shall be followed
03 Site Execution Natural Environment and  Utilizing the existing roads and tracks as
biodiversity much as possible
 Backfilling of test pits and boreholes
 Restoring surface and any vegetation
where is has be disturbed significantly
 Restriction of access to common public
into the execution site by proposer 24x7
security personnel
 Avoiding over staff and vehicle traffic by
proper planning and scheduling
04 Traffic and Direct and Indirect hazards  It is mandatory to follow all traffic rules
Vehicle to public traffic and by all vehicles in association to the
Movement passerby project
 Staff training to be conducted
periodically for safe site access and to
avoid traffic and disturbance in road to
general public by all means
 Adjustment of working hours to local
traffic pattern
 Signposts, warning signs, traffic
diversions and barriers shall be applied
wherever required.
05 Air Quality Particulate Matter and  During excavation and other related
Dust Nuisance activities during wind, the fugitive dusts
generated shall be suppressed by
spraying waters manually or by
installation of sprinklers dust screen
enclosures around the site
 Excavated materials shall be covered
with sheets or wetted for dust
prevention
 The surrounding environment i.e.,
outside the site premises shall be kept
free of garbage or any solid waste
 No combustion of any waste inside the
site
 Proper nose mask and eye goggles shall
be provided to all site staffs, labours and
visitors inside the site.
 All construction vehicles shall be
properly maintained and shall possess
valid "Pollution under control
certificate"
06 Water Quality Sewage/  Mobile toilets shall be installed to avoid
215
CSIR-NEERI

Domestic Effluent open urination/defecation
 Mobile STPs shall be installed to treat
the domestic effluent generated in the
site
 No wastewater shall be discharged out
of the site premises without proper
treatment
07 Noise Quality Unpleasant Noise  Drilling activities shall be limited to the
restricted timings as per the permit
 Proper ear muffs and plugs shall be
provided to all site staffs, labours and
visitors
 The DG sets, air compressors and other
powered mechanical items shall be
closed with covers.
08 Waste Hazardous wastes, Solid  All classified hazardous wastes
Management Wastes, Construction generated in the site (engine oil, used
Debris etc., chemicals etc.,) shall be disposed
properly via authorized TSDF facilities
 All solid and construction wastes shall
be properly disposed as per the waste
management guidelines
 Waste generation and disposal record
shall be maintained clearly
 Reuse and Recycle viable materials shall
be utilized wherever feasible
09 Worker Safety Labours, Staffs and Visitors  Entry into the site without proper PPE's
shall be restricted and the PPE shall
meet international quality standards
 No activity shall start without obtaining
proper permits
 Proper induction shall be given to all
staffs and labours to work in a safe and
disciplined environment
 First Aid kits and an ambulance with
driver shall be mad readily available at
the site at all times.
10 Relocation of Electric Poles, telephone  All utility services inside and close to the
Utility Services lines etc., site that may be impacted by
construction shall be identified and
concerned authorities shall be informed
to remove/relocate and restore services
and shall be ensured no damage to
public properties during any of the site
activities
216
CSIR-NEERI
Table 42 Mitigation Measures for Operation Phase

01 Water Quality Discharge Quality of  The STP should do not run beyond its
treated sewage design load to avoid underperformance
or failure.
 It shall be ensured to the final treated
water meets the discharge norms
 Utmost care to be taken that no sewage
shall be bypassed or discharged
untreated unless the flow is beyond the
plant's volumetric capacity
02 Air Quality Particulate Matter and  The DG sets shall be services periodically
Odour  The excess sludge from the aerobic
system shall be dried and disposed as
per the sludge management plant
 Pest control services may be
approached to attend any rodent or
insect nuisance
26.3.1 Environmental Monitoring Plan
The Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) is a necessary part of the Environmental

Management Plan that plays an important role to monitor the possible impacts on
environment for any new implementation schemes. Following the EMP shall provide a
strong hint for the management to identify whether the mitigation measures are
dedicatedly adopted. The Environmental Monitoring Programme to be followed in
construction phase as well as in operation phase are tabulated in the below Table- 43.
Table 43 EMP for Construction and Operation Phase
Sr. No Activity Responsibility Monitoring Action Frequency

Construction Phase
01 Site Establishment Contractor Site Plan to be formed showing Prior to the
& related activities boundaries followed by areas of initiation of
storage point, vehicle construction
movement point, entry and exit activities
gate etc.,
Housekeeping On daily basis
217
CSIR-NEERI

02 Site Preparation, Contractor As per the contract On daily basis
Excavation/ specifications
backfilling
03 Water Quality Contractor and Monitoring of measures taken On daily basis
Management concerned to prevent untreated discharge
Nagar Parishad of wastewater/ sewage
generated in the site during
construction
04 Ambient Air Contractor and Monitoring of adequate dust On weekly/
Quality concerned suppression techniques monthly basis
Management Nagar Parishad followed during construction
Checking of Pollution Under On periodical
Control certificates for all basis(depends
on the PUC
certificate
validity period)
05 Noise Pollution Contractor and Monitoring if the drilling and On daily basis
Management concerned any other high noise generating
Nagar Parishad construction/demolition
activities are carried out only
during the permitted time
limits
06 Solid Waste Contractor Monitoring proper usage of On weekly/
Management disposal facilities and no monthly basis
stocking up of waste for longer
time
07 Water Logging Contractor Monitoring the construction On daily basis
Management activities, Raw material store during monsoon
house or waste materials dump and rest of the
yard does not cause any water period of the
logging in the site year on weekly
basis
218
CSIR-NEERI

08 HSE Management Contractor Induction to be provided for As required
new labours/ staffs
Safety talks by HSE team. On weekly basis
Record all injuries in the site
during construction phase
09 Road Safety and Contractor/ Monitor movement of vehicles On daily basis
Traffic Regional Traffic and permit large trucks and
Management Police Division containers to approach and exit
site only during non-peak hours
10 Public Safety Contractor and Monitor to ensure the On daily basis
Management concerned surrounding locality/
Nagar Parishad community does not face
difficulties in any form due to
any of the construction and its
related activities
Operation Phase
01 Inlet/ Outlet O&M Monitor to ensure the flow On daily basis
Sewage Flow and Contractor does not increase the design
Characteristics flow and similarly the
characteristics as per design
load. Also monitor final treated
water meets discharge
standards
02 Final Treated Concerned Monitoring of the quality of On weekly/
Water Nagar Parishad/ Final treated Water Monthly basis
Pollution
Control Board Monitoring of any industrial On weekly/
effluent discharged into the Monthly basis
STPs
219
CSIR-NEERI
As discussed earlier the construction phase shall have few short-term impacts, however, it
can be minimized by adhering strictly to the suggested mitigation measures. Upon
successful construction and commissioning of the interception and diversion of sewers
followed by Sewage Treatment Plant, shall realize several positive benefits, most
significantly good sanitation, public health and reduction in pollution of the river Ganga and
its tributaries.
27 Conclusion
Upon implementation of the I&D scheme followed by STP, the pollution load of River Ganga
by contribution of the Gajna River passing through the Supaul city shall come down. This in
turn also increase the sanitation level of the city and also reduction in sewage disposal to
open areas shall bring down the outbreak of water borne diseases in the locality.
The total estimated cost for implementation of I&D and STP scheme with 15 years of O&M for
Supaul town is 69.92 Crores.
220
CSIR-NEERI
Pre-site Visit Data Requirement list for DpR preparation of l&D followed
STP under the tributaries of River Ganga
7) Fill iir ollapplicable dato

2) ,,
Date: ttllltx,t?
Name of the city/town/village Supaul
Name and details of the contact B\"YuY\ VI)'-\AJ>

person/co-ordinator/incharge of the Cat c-.1.i!4e- c++i sarl..tNogan %u,'t1"r4
particular project (The person shall be I"er{)
1789?6rgro-
available for contact in case of any
query or data required in regards to
the particular location/project)
Details about the place, population 65qq.C 106 ?e:r>- eatau4 *tj
(as per latest census data available),
geological importance, dflV other

details etc.,
lf Nallah, then the nallah water is
being discharged into? (lake, river t) htg \^o( r'tGr-

etc., D t-.;+-* Pert(o1irt*J
)
iglrtta^y 0',,t * otit'rgffi
Approximate width and depth of
2.xf-s ler<t.slanl._f
nallah (m)
Domestic Water Consu mption
i. Present (LPCD) l3s LPC.D

ii. Planned for Future (LpCD)
Centralised Raw Water Supply scheme
available? lf yes details of total
cslR- Notional Environmentol Engineering Research tnstitute

Pre-site Visit Data Requirement list for DpR preparafion of raD followed
STP under the tributaries of River Ganga
Information
volume supplied per day (Cu.m)
OB Other sources of unaccounted water

9+uUt 4\^r*+r, b q
consumption by the
population/premises t^'€{r/r tA,r^4,,b1ufi a'"t' i O.
(Dug
),n ho-trlra'
wel l/Borewel l/River/La ke)
09 Average Sewage/Waste water flow

rate at the nallah, during both peak Plu
hours and normal hours (Cu.m/hr)
10 Type of waste water
[domestic/canteen/sewage/i nd ustria l) 4r^^l.t.a{i C

1*)rsag.z'
flowing in the nallah and its
characteristics (Ph, BOD, COD, TSS,
TDS, N, P, DO)
1,1 Provide the dimensions of Land
available for construction of l&D canal
and STP (if no single patch available

then provide dimensions of all the
land available for the purpose)
l. Length (m)
10oue-'
ll. Breadth (m)
lll. Area (sq.m)
1.2 Latitude & Longitude of the proposed L 3

site for the implementation of the
STP.
13 Map of the village/town with contour,
CSIR- National
I Pre-Site Visit Data Requirement list for DPR preparation of l&D followed
I STP under the tributaries of River Ganga
sewer lines and open drainage
showing flow direction(lf available)

'tflauq.L
.htr'r"ntpl-a& o.t \
Proposed use of final treated water dirpo{,aq ds \^r4l-r4- uediz*'
after implementation of STP(reuse for
irrigation or disposal to water bodies
or back flushing etc.,)
Any major site preparation required

at the proposed site of construction of
the STP (back filling/rearranging

pipes/dismantling floor tiles or
RCC/rock breaking/marshy land etc. j
\Locr r^rn
Average rain fall of the
Yb cr-9oon 9 e -, o I '. taH IIt:n <
village/town/city and number of days f1\ A oc [:.bers'
where rainfall is more than 100mm
Soil strata of the site for 3.5m depth

3o^\ S"\\ aLsr\\ J\oq$at.r
(if soil strata data is not available, Lc qk r libr e- o?v 'r q PP?o x
then kindly arrange to dig a trial pit of

$rn
.%o\ &t\ t'Pb. Q'5 rl '
1mxLmx2.5m depth for sampling
during site visit by the personnel)
Any industrial waste water (treated or
untreated) discharged into the nallah,
if yes details of the industry with J)L

quantity and characteristics of the
effluent discharged
Any cottage industry/small scale

Pre-Site Visit Data Requirement 7
STP under the tributaries of River Ganga )
; industries/dairy farm/ others alonf

the nallah. lf yes' details of the
industry
20 Local Constructien Materials Cost for Ceu'a*\',r $*p.:>g,1.eJx-a.o-'

Cement, Sand, TMT Bars & Blue Metal
tlNfts,-t ', ? A< P".r> Sc^t.{cl,tJ.or'
(Avg rate of last 6 months) This data is
Tr-tT jxA,\r
- ft*Q-> Jd*;[r"!^'
mondotory for consideration in the
preporotion of the Detoiled project
(\r-/ent&^l^oLis cA,'^,,tqr- )
Report (DPR)
[*'
HFL
QZ I ft'fnorrr 62c\ ,
| Sgno.\s""1 ^
Site Visit Report of I&D of drains and STP at Supaul, Bihar on June 6th, 2019
Supaul is a town and municipality in Supaul district in the Indian state of Bihar. It is situated in
north Bihar, about 250 kms north east of capital city of Bihar, Patna.
A site visit to Supaul for the I&D of drains and STP was undertaken on June 6th, 2019with two
officers from BUIDCO. There were no member present from the consultant group. We started
the day with this visit to Supaul Nagar Parishad from where the EO joined us for the visit. We
firstly visited the proposed site for the STP located in ward 24 followed by the other two IPS
sites located in ward 2 and ward 5. The visit concluded in a meeting with District Magistrate of
Supaul where a brief discussion regarding the proposed work was made.
DPR for I&D of drains and STP at Supaul, Bihar
Following the site visit with officers of BUIDCO on June 6th, 2019 following was observed:
Followings were present during site visit:
1. Shri Yogendra Kumar, Executive Engineer, BUIDCO, Patna

2. Shri Ratnesh Kumar, DPD, BUIDCO, Patna
3. Shri Rex Basumatary, PG Research Student, HRED, IIT Roorkee
4. Shri Aamod K Karmaksh, PG Research Student, HRED, IIT Roorkee
1. There are total three outfalls in the city located near the proposed STP site adjacent to Supaul
Engineering College, near BSS College and near NavodayaVidyalay on PipraRoad.
Outfall 1 (near Supaul Engineering College, Ward 24)- The outfall is not lined and whole sewage
is flowing in open land in the low lying areas.
Outfall 2 (near BSS College, Ward 2) - The outfall is not lined and whole sewage is flowing in
Gajna River.
Outfall 3 (near NavodayaVidyalay, Ward 5)- The outfall is not lined and whole sewage is
flowing in open land in the low lying areas.
2. The site proposed for STP is near the Outfall 1 adjacent to Supaul Engineering College and
IPS is proposed at remaining two outfalls. As per the visit, the proposed sites for IPSmatches
with locations mentioned in Fighre 12 & 13 of Section 7.1 and does not match with the location
shown in Map (Annexure- XII).
The intercepting sewer from outfall 2 is proposed along the railway line to STP through rising
main with an approximate length of 2.5 kms. The intercepting sewer from outfall 3 is proposed
along the canal (which is flowing through the city from the direction of north-east to south)
through rising main with an approximate length of 5.75 kms.
3. The proposed land of STP measures approximately 105 m x 55 m. There is an uncompleted

construction of a structure built in the middle of the proposed site named Samrat Ashok Bhawan.
The effluent from STP is proposed to be discharged into the canal flowing 1 km south of the site.
4. During discussion with EO, it came to our knowledge that for the water supply as per
CPHEEO, the pipelines has already been laid and will be initiated by December 2019. He also
further stated that the supply will be done for roughly 6 hours throughout the day, 3 each during
morning and evening.
5. As told by the visiting officers from BUIDCO and EO, there are possibility of availability of
suitable land for decentralized STPs at near outfall 2 and 3.
6. As per the informationcollected during site visit and from the DPR about IPS, STP,
intercepting sewers, rising main, and their length a not to scale flow diagram is attached below.
Flow diagram of proposed works

Photographs from the site visit to Supaul on June 6th, 2019.
Outfall near Supaul Engineering College Existing Structure built on the
Proposed site for STP
Outfall near BSS College and Suitable land available for IPS
Outfall near NavodayaVidyalaya and suitable land available for IPS
Suitable land available for decentralised STP Suitable land available for decentralised STP
near BSS College Outfall near NavodayaVidyalaya Outfall
REGD. NO. D. L.-33004/99
EXTRAORDINARY
II— — (i)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (i)
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
843]
No. 843] NEW DELHI, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2017/ASVINA 21, 1939
पर्यावरण, वन और जलवयर्ु पररवर्ान मंत्रयलर्

अधिसूचनय
नई दिल्ली, 13 , 2017
सय.कय.धन. 1265(अ).—के न्द्रीर् सरकयर, पर्यावरण (संरक्षण) अधिधनर्म, 1986 (1986 कय 29) की ियरय 6
और ियरय 25 द्वयरय प्रित्त शधिर्ों कय प्रर्ोग करर्े हुए, पर्यावरण (संरक्षण) धनर्म, 1986 कय और संशोिन करने के धलए
धनम्नधलधिर् धनर्म बनयर्ी है, अर्यार्् : —
1. संधक्षप्त नयम और प्रयरम्भ :—(1) इन धनर्मों कय संधक्षप्त नयम पर्यावरण (संरक्षण) संशोिन धनर्म, 2017 है ।
(2) र्े रयजपत्र में उनके प्रकयशन की र्यरीि को प्रवृत्त होंगे ।
2. पर्यावरण (संरक्षण) धनर्म, 1986 की अनुसूची-1 में, क्रम संखर्यंक 104 और उससे सम्बधन्द्िर् प्रधवधिर्ों के पश्चयर््,
धनम्नधलधिर् क्रम संखर्यंक और प्रधवधिर्यं अन्द्र्ःस्र्यधपर् की जयएगी, अर्यार्् :—
क्र. सं. उद्योग मयनिंड मयनक

1 2 3 4
बधहर्स्याव धनस्सयरण मयनक (धनपटयन के सभी ढंगों को लयगू)
“105 मल उपचयर संर्ंत्र अवस्र्यन सयंर कय
(एसटीपी) धनम्नधलधिर् से
अधिक न होनय
(क) (ि)
पीएच िेश में कहीं भी 6.5-9.0
जैव-रयसयर्धनक महयनगर* अरूणयचल प्रिेश, असम,
ऑक्सीजन मयंग मधणपुर, मेघयलर्, धमजोरम, नयगयलैण्ड,
(बीओडी) धत्रपुरय, धसदिम, धहमयचल प्रिेश,
उत्तरयिंड, जम्मू-कश्मीर रयज्र्ों और
6196 GI/2017 (1)

2 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II—SEC. 3(i)]
अंिमयन और धनकोबयर द्वीप, ियिरय और

नयगर हवेली, िमण और िीव और
लक्षद्वीप के धसवयर्, सभी रयज्र्ों की
रयजियनी ।
ऊपर उधल्लधिर् से धभन्न क्षेत्र/प्रिेश 30
कु ल धनलंधबर् ठोस महयनगर* अरूणयचल प्रिेश, असम, <50
पियर्ा (टीएसएस) मधणपुर, मेघयलर्, धमजोरम, नयगयलैण्ड,
धत्रपुरय, धसदिम, धहमयचल प्रिेश,
उत्तरयिंड, जम्मू-कश्मीर रयज्र्ों और
अंिमयन और धनकोबयर द्वीप, ियिरय और
नयगर हवेली, िमण और िीव और
लक्षद्वीप के धसवयर्, सभी रयज्र्ों की
रयजियनी ।
ऊपर उधल्लधिर् से धभन्न क्षेत्र/प्रिेश <100
फे कल कोलीफॉमा िेश में कहीं भी <1000
(एफसी) (अधर्संभयव्य
संखर्य प्रधर् 100
धमलीधलटर
एमपीएन/100
धमलीधलटर
*मुम्बई, दिल्ली, कोलकयर्य, चेन्नई, बेंगलूरू, हैिरयबयि, अहमियबयि और पुणे महयनगर हैं ।
रटप्पण :
(i) पीएच और फै कल कौलीफॉमा के धसवयर्, धमलीग्रयम/धलटर में सभी मूल्र् ।
(ii) र्े, मयनक जलयशर्ों में धनस्सयरण और भूधम धनपटयन/अनुप्रर्ोगों के धलए लयगू होंगे ।
(iii) फै कल कौलीफॉमा के धलए मयनक औद्योधगक प्रर्ोजनों के धलए उपचयररर् बधहर्स्याव के उपर्ोग के सम्बन्द्ि में लयगू
नहीं होंगे ।
(iv) र्े मयनक 1 जून, 2019 को र्य उसके पश्चयर्् कमीशन दकए जयने वयले सभी मल उपचयर संर्ंत्रों (एसटीपी) को
लयगू होंगे और पुरयने/धवद्यमयन मल उपचयर संर्ंत्र (एसटीपी) रयजपत्र में इस अधिसूचनय के प्रकयशन की र्यरीि
से पयंच वर्ा की अवधि के भीर्र इन मयनकों को प्रयप्त करें गे ।
(v) समुर में उपचयररर् बधहर्स्याव के धनस्सयरण के मयमले में, इसे उधचर् समुरी मुहयने के मयध्र्म से दकर्य जयएगय और
धवद्यमयन र्ट धनस्सयरण को समुरी मुहयनों में संपररवर्र्ार् दकर्य जयएगय और उन मयमलों में, जहयं समुरी मुहयनय
धनस्सयरण के धबन्द्ि ु पर 150 गुणय न्द्र्न
ू र्म आरधम्भक र्नुकरण और धनस्सयरण धबन्द्ि ु से िूर 100 मीटर के दकसी
धबन्द्ि ु पर 1500 गुणय न्द्र्न
ू र्म र्नुकरण प्रियन करर्य है, र्ब धवद्यमयन सधन्नर्म सयियरण धनस्सयरण मयनकों में
धवधनर्िाि दकए गए अनुसयर लयगू होंगे ।
(vi) उपचयररर् बधहर्स्याव कय पुनःउपर्ोग/पुनःचक्रण र्र्य उन मयमलों में, जहयं उपचयररर् बधहर्स्याव के भयग कय
पुनःउपर्ोग और पुनःचक्रण दकर्य जयर्य है धजसमें मयनवीर् सम्पका की सम्भयवनय अन्द्र्वाधलर् है, ऊपर र्र्य
धवधनर्िाि मयनक लयगू होंगे ।
(vii) के न्द्रीर् प्रिूर्ण धनर्ंत्रण बोडा/रयज्र् प्रिूर्ण धनर्ंत्रण बोडा/प्रिूर्ण धनर्ंत्रण सधमधर्र्यं, पर्यावरण (संरक्षण)
अधिधनर्म, 1986 की ियरय 5 के अिीन स्र्यनीर् पररवेश को ध्र्यन में रिर्े हुए, अधिक कठोर सधन्नर्म जयरी
कर सके गय/कर सकें गी ।
[फय. सं. क्र्ू-15017/2/2008/-सीपीडब्लल्र्ू]

अरुण कु मयर मेहर्य, अपर सधचव
II (ii) 3
रटप्पण : मूल धनर्म भयरर् के रयजपत्र, असयियरण, भयग II, िंड 3, उप-िंड (i) में कय.आ. सं. 844(अ), र्यरीि 19 नवम्बर,
1986 द्वयरय प्रकयधशर् दकए गए र्े और र्त्पश्चयर्् उनमें धनम्नधलधिर् अधिसूचनयओं द्वयरय संशोिन दकए गए र्े, अर्यार्् :—
कय.आ. 433(अ), र्यरीि 18 अप्रैल, 1987; सय.कय.धन. 176(अ), र्यरीि 2 अप्रैल, 1996; सय.कय.धन. 97(अ), र्यरीि
18 फरवरी, 2009; सय.कय.धन. 149(अ), र्यरीि 4 मयचा, 2009; सय.कय.धन. 543(अ), र्यरीि 22 जुलयई, 2009; सय.कय.धन.
739(अ), र्यरीि 9 धसर्म्बर, 2010; सय.कय.धन. 809(अ), र्यरीि 4 अिू बर, 2010; सय.कय.धन. 215(अ), र्यरीि 15 मयचा,
2011; सय.कय.धन. 221(अ), र्यरीि 18 मयचा, 2011; सय.कय.धन. 354(अ), र्यरीि 2 मई, 2011; सय.कय.धन. 424(अ),
र्यरीि 1 जून, 2011; सय.कय.धन. 446(अ), र्यरीि 13 जून, 2011; सय.कय.धन. 152(अ), र्यरीि 16 मयचा, 2012;
सय.कय.धन. 266(अ), र्यरीि 30 मयचा, 2012; सय.कय.धन. 277(अ), र्यरीि 31 मयचा, 2012; सय.कय.धन. 820(अ), र्यरीि
9 नवम्बर, 2012; सय.कय.धन. 176(अ), र्यरीि 18 मयचा, 2013; सय.कय.धन. 535(अ), र्यरीि 7 अगस्र्, 2013; सय.कय.धन.
771(अ), र्यरीि 11 दिसम्बर, 2013; सय.कय.धन. 2(अ), र्यरीि 2 जनवरी, 2014; सय.कय.धन. 229(अ), र्यरीि 28 मयचा,
2014; सय.कय.धन. 232(अ), र्यरीि 31 मयचा, 2014; सय.कय.धन. 325(अ), र्यरीि 7 मई, 2014; सय.कय.धन. 612(अ),
र्यरीि 25 अगस्र्, 2014; सय.कय.धन. 789(अ), र्यरीि 11 नवम्बर, 2014; कय.आ. 3305(अ), र्यरीि 7 दिसम्बर, 2015;
कय.आ. 4(अ), र्यरीि 1 जनवरी, 2016; सय.कय.धन. 35(अ), र्यरीि 14 जनवरी, 2016; सय.कय.धन. 281(अ), र्यरीि
7 मयचा, 2016; सय.कय.धन. 496(अ), र्यरीि 9 मई, 2016; सय.कय.धन. 497(अ), र्यरीि 10 मई, 2016; सय.कय.धन.
978(अ), र्यरीि 10 अिू बर, 2016; और अंधर्म बयर अधिसूचनय संखर्यंक सय.कय.धन. 1016(अ), र्यरीि 28 अिू बर, 2016
द्वयरय संशोधिर् दकए गए र्े ।
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE

NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 13th October, 2017
G.S.R. 1265(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sections 6 and 25 of the Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986 (29 of 1986), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to
amend the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, namely:-
1. Short title and commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Environment (Protection)
Amendment Rules, 2017.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, in Schedule – I, after serial number 104 and the entries
relating thereto, the following serial number and entries shall be inserted, namely:—
Sl. Industry Parameters Standards

No.
1 2 3 4
Effluent discharge standards (applicable to all mode of disposal)
“105 Sewage Location Concentration not
Treatment to exceed
Plants (a) (b)
(STPs) pH Anywhere in the country 6.5-9.0
Bio-Chemical Oxygen Metro Cities*, all State Capitals except 20
Demand (BOD) in the State of Arunachal Pradesh,
Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya Mizoram,
Nagaland, Tripura Sikkim, Himachal
Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Jammu and
Kashmir, and Union territory of
4 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II—SEC. 3(i)]
Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Dadar

and Nagar Haveli Daman and Diu and
Lakshadweep
Areas/regions other than mentioned 30
above
Total Suspended Metro Cities*, all State Capitals except <50
Solids (TSS) in the State of Arunachal Pradesh,
Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya Mizoram,
Nagaland, Tripura Sikkim, Himachal
Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Jammu and
Kashmir and Union territory of
Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Dadar
and Nagar Haveli Daman and Diu and
Lakshadweep
Areas/regions other than mentioned <100
above
Fecal Coliform (FC) Anywhere in the country <1000
(Most Probable
Number per 100
milliliter, MPN/100ml
*Metro Cities are Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Ahmedabad and Pune.
Note :
(i) All values in mg/l except for pH and Fecal Coliform.
(ii) These standards shall be applicable for discharge into water bodies as well as for land
disposal/applications.
(iii) The standards for Fecal Coliform shall not apply in respect of use of treated effluent for
industrial purposes.
(iv) These Standards shall apply to all STPs to be commissioned on or after the 1st June, 2019 and
the old/existing STPs shall achieve these standards within a period of five years from date of
publication of this notification in the Official Gazette.
(v) In case of discharge of treated effluent into sea, it shall be through proper marine outfall and the
existing shore discharge shall be converted to marine outfalls, and in cases where the marine
outfall provides a minimum initial dilution of 150 times at the point of discharge and a minimum
dilution of 1500 times at a point 100 meters away from discharge point, then, the existing norms
shall apply as specified in the general discharge standards.
(vi) Reuse/Recycling of treated effluent shall be encouraged and in cases where part of the treated
effluent is reused and recycled involving possibility of human contact, standards as specified
above shall apply.
(vii) Central Pollution Control Board/State Pollution Control Boards/Pollution Control Committees
may issue more stringent norms taking account to local condition under section 5 of the
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986”.
[F. No. Q-15017/2/2008-CPW]

ARUN KUMAR MEHTA, Addl. Secy.
Note : The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3,Sub-
section (i) vide number S.O. 844 (E), dated the 19th November, 1986 and subsequently amended
vide the following notifications, namely:—
S.O. 433 (E), dated the 18th April 1987; G.S.R. 176(E) dated the 2nd April, 1996; G.S.R. 97 (E),
dated the 18th February, 2009; G.S.R. 149 (E), dated the 4th March , 2009; G.S.R. 543(E), dated the 22nd
July,2009; G.S.R. 739 (E), dated the 9th September, 2010; G.S.R. 809(E), dated the 4th October, 2010, G.S.R.
II (ii) 5
215 (E), dated the 15th March, 2011; G.S.R. 221(E), dated the 18th March, 2011; G.S.R. 354 (E), dated the 2nd
May, 2011; G.S.R. 424 (E), dated the 1st June, 2011; G.S.R. 446 (E), dated the 13th June, 2011; G.S.R.
152 (E), dated the 16th March, 2012; G.S.R. 266(E), dated the 30th March, 2012; and G.S.R. 277 (E), dated the
31st March, 2012; and G.S.R. 820(E), dated the 9th November, 2012; G.S.R. 176 (E), dated the 18th March,
2013; G.S.R. 535(E), dated the 7th August, 2013; G.S.R. 771(E), dated the 11th December, 2013; G.S.R. 2(E),
dated the 2nd January, 2014; G.S.R. 229 (E), dated the 28th March, 2014; G.S.R. 232(E), dated the 31st March,
2014; G.S.R. 325(E), dated the 7th May, 2014; G.S.R. 612, (E), dated the 25th August 2014; G.S.R. 789(E),
dated the 11th November 2014; S.O. 3305(E), dated the 7th December, 2015; S.O.4(E), dated the 1st January
2016; G.S.R. 35(E), dated the 14th January 2016; G.S.R. 281 (E), dated the 7th March, 2016; G.S.R. 496(E),
dated the 9th May, 2016; G.S.R.497(E), dated the 10th May, 2016; G.S.R.978(E), dated the 10thOctober, 2016;
and lastly amended vide notification G.S.R. 1016(E), dated the 28th October, 2016.
RAKESH SUKUL Digitally signed by RAKESH SUKUL

Date: 2017.10.17 17:32:27 +05'30'
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.
Item No. 04 Court No.1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL

PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No. 1069/2018

(M.A. No. 1792/2018, M.A. No. 1793/2018, I.A. No. 150/2019 & I.A.
No. 151/2019)
Nitin Shankar Deshpande Applicant(s)
Versus
Union of India &Ors. Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 30.04.2019
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, CHAIRPERSON

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON’BLE DR. NAGIN NANDA, EXPERT MEMBER
For Applicant(s): Ms. Ekta Sikri and Ms. K. Gayatri, Advocates
For Respondent (s): Mr. Rajkumar, Advocate for CPCB

Mr. Gigi C. George, Advocate for MoEF&CC
Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashish
Wad and Mr. Sidharth Mahajan, Advocates
ORDER
1. The issue for consideration is effluent discharge standards for STPs
as laid down vide Notification dated 13.10.2017 by way of
Environment (Protection) Amendment Rules, 2017 against Serial No.
105 of Schedule-I to the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986.
2. Vide order dated 21.12.2018, this Tribunal noted that untreated or
partially treated sewage is a major source of pollution in the country.
1
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Paryavaran Suraksha
Samiti & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors.1 directed taking of steps so
that huge gap in sewage generated and treated is bridged.
3. The Tribunal also noted that the proposed standards as per Draft
Notification dated 24.11.2015 issued by Ministry of Environment,
Forest & Climate Change (MoEF & CC) are sought to be diluted by
the impugned Notification as follows:
Sr. Parameters Old Draft MoEF& CC

No. Norms Norms Notification
1986 Nov., 15 October 2017
1. Biochemical <30 <10 <30 and <20

Oxygen Demand
(BOD) (mg/l) (metro cities)
2. Chemical <250 50 No limit

Oxygen Demand
(COD) (mg/l)
3. Total Suspended <100 <20 <100 and <50

Solids (TSS) (metro cities)
(mg/l)
4. Total Nitrogen <100 <10 No limit

(mg/l)
5. Ammonical <50 <5 No limit
Nitrogen (mg/l)
6. Total No limit No limit No limit
Phosphorus
(mg/l)
7. Fecal Coliform No limit <100 <1000
MPN/100 ml
4. The Tribunal also noted that the relaxed standards will deteriorate
the water quality and degrade the environment and be a retrograde
1(2017) 5 SCC 326
2
step. The dilution will also affect the human life and the water quality
of the rivers.
5. Accordingly, the Tribunal constituted an Expert Committee
comprising the nominees from IIT Kanpur, IIT Roorkee, NEERI and
CPCB which was to give its report after examining the best available
technologies and best practices and after referring to the Experts
study on the subject particularly CPCB Report on “River Stretches for
Restoration of Water Quality, 2014-15” and the order of this Tribunal
on the subject of polluted river stretches dated 20.09.2018 in Original
Application No. 673/2018 in the matter of News item published in
“The Hindu” authored by Shri Jacob Koshy titled “More river stretches
are now critically polluted : CPCB”. The Tribunal also directed stay of
operation of the impugned Notification and application of pre-revised
standards till further orders.
6. Accordingly, report has been received from CPCB vide e-mail dated
30.04.2019 forwarding the Expert Committee report. The report
noted the current status of water quality of rivers which flows in India
and the fact that 351 river stretches out of 323 rivers were polluted.
There was need for revised standards for BOD and COD with a view
to protect the water quality of the rivers/streams. There was also a
need for revised standards for TSS, for Nitrogen (Ammonia & Nitrates)
and Phosphorus and for Fecal Coliform.
3
7. The Committee while discussing the need for revised the Standards
for BOD and COD observed that:
“Inclusion of COD in sewage discharge certainly offers

advantages in terms of early diagnosis on functioning of STPs
and thus helps in resorting immediate measures/corrective
actions. This is because analysis of COD is completed within
5 Hours as against 5 days at 20oc or 3 days at 27oC for BOD
(Sawyer & Mccarty, V. Edition). Moreover, if Government
wishes to regulate STPs across the county through online
monitoring system in future, inclusion of COD in Discharge
Standards will prove beneficial for the reason that COD
sensors are quite reliable and readily available in Indian
market, however the same is not the case with BOD sensors.
Thus, from regulatory point of view also, COD is an important
parameter and needs to be included in sewage Discharge
Standards.”
While discussing the need for revised standards for TSS the
Committee has observed that:
“ The Microbial quality of wastewater could be linked with

the TSS concentration. The larger the Suspended solids, the
larger shall be the presence of bacteria, protozoa and viruses.
High TSS wastewater cannot be easily disinfected, as the
suspended particles “hide” these microorganisms and also
react with chemical disinfectants.”
Further the committee observed:
“A well designed and operated conventional sewage

treatment system such as activated sludge process can meet
20 mg/L effluent TSS discharge standards. Many STPs bases
on secondary wastewater treatment all over the globe are
able to achieve 10-20mg/L. TSS without any tertiary
treatment.”
4
Further with regard to the need for revised standard for Nitrogen
(Ammonia & Nitrates) and Phosphorus it has been elaborated by
Committee that:
“Nitrogen and phosphorus in all forms are major rate limiting

elements essential for the growth of alage and other
vegetation in water bodies leading to a state called
eutorphication. The greenish color water with large vegetation
growth is common sight for not only lakes and ponds but also
slow moving rivers.
Eutrophication arises from the oversupply of nutrients (N &
P), which leads to overgrowth of plants and alage.
Degradation of dead alage and plants by microbes consumes
dissoloved oxygen in the water, thereby creating the state of
hypoxie.
Eutrophication leads to many problems related to water
quality:
 Large Dissolved oxygen variation leads to fish kills
 Filling the water body with dead algae and other
vegetation.
 Decomposition of dead algae and vegetation at the
bottom causing oxygen depletion and further release of
nutrient.
 Release of algal toxins and odors causing substances
make the water unsuitable for human and animal
consumption.”
The Committee has also observed that:
Due to the absence of dilution and worsening of our rivers

and lakes, it is necessary to move towards nutrients (nitrogen
and phosphorus) regulations in water bodies.
5
The Committee while discussing the revised standards for Fecal
Coliforms observed:
“As per "Houses and Household Amenities, Latrine Facility,

Census of India - 2011, Registrar General and Commissioner,
India" available at http://censusindia.gov.in/
2011census/hlo/ Data sheet/ India / Latrine. Pdf; Out of 7.9
Crores Urban Households (UHH), nearly 1.7 Crores UHH (i.e.
20 %) lacks adequate sanitation. At the same time more than
5 lakhs villages in the country are now open defecation free
(ODF) (https:// sbm.gov.in/sbmdashboard / ODF.aspx.)
Although rural parts are covered through sanitary toilets,
effluent from septic tanks from newly built 9.2 crores toilets
across the country is unavoidable. This may pose very high
health risk owing to the fact that "Sanitation" including
collection, conveyance and treatment is either absent or
inadequate in such areas. Relaxing FC pose risk to
downstream cities/town/villages that rely on drinking
water source on same water body in case of rivers. It
appears quite reasonable to say that FC Standards be
prescribed to 100 MPN/100 ml. considering its impact
on human health in general and readiness of Indian
wastewater sector to handle the same (Recommended
value of FC in CPHEE0 Manual, 2013 is MPS230/100
mI.). (emphasis added)
Hence, CPHEE0 2013 recommended the following guidelines

for treated sewage discharge into surface water which after
some travel may join a drinking water source to be used
as source of supply for drinking water as given in
following Table 5.20
Table 5.20 Recommended Guidelines for Treated Sewage if

Discharged into Surface Water to be used as source of
Drinking Water.
6
Parameter MoEF Standards (A) Recommended
Values
BOD, mg/L 30 Less than 10
SS, mg/L 100 Less than 10
TN, mg/L 100 Less than 10
Dissolved P, 5 Less than 2
mg/L
Faecal Not specified Less than 230
Coliforms,
MPN/100 mL
(A) General Standards, Environmental Protection Rule, 1986

& as authorized by PCB
• In order to achieve the above values, the treatment process

would need to be designed for nutrient removal in addition to
the conventional BOD and SS removal. It has also been
reported that if the nutrients were removed to the levels
mentioned in Table 3.20, then the amount of chlorine
required for disinfection would be less at about 5 mg/ l.
Considering aforementioned analysis, the Chairman CPCB

directed all State Pollution Control Boards to make it
mandatory for local bodies to set up sewerage systems for
treatment and disposal of sewage to meet the prescribed
standards ie., pH 6.5-9, BOD (mg/L): Not more than 10, COD
(mg/L ): Not more than 50, TSS (mg/L) : Not more than 20,
NH4-N (mg/L): Not more than 5, N-total (mg/L) Not more than
10 ,Fecal Coliforms (MPN/100 ml) Less than 230. The
details are provided in Annexure 1.”
8. The report further mentions that the stringent standards in terms of
Draft Notification dated 24.11.2015 are not only economically viable
7
and technically feasible, the cost will not be significantly high. In this
regard, it was observed:
“7.0 ECONOMIC VIABILITY & RESOURCE POSITION
1. For Nitrification (Conversion of ammonia to nitrate), 20-30%

larger aeration tanks are required with additional 40-50 %
aeration demand. The Total capital and O&M cost of the
system increases by 10-20 & 5-10 % respectively.
2. For further removal of nitrate from wastewater,

denitrification (conversion of nitrate to Nitrogen gas) is needed
by additional anoxic tank in the system. The capital cost
further increases by 5-10 %. Nevertheless, denitrification gives
25 % oxygen credit which reduces 25 % aeration requirement.
3. Finally, overall capital and operational cost implications for

achieving standards for metropolitan and class-I cities shall
be 20-30 %.
4. Typical total unit costs for wastewater treatment based on

experience gained in Western Europe and the USA is
presented in Figure XX (WHO/ UNEP 1997), The total unit cost
for secondary treatment (BOD < 20-30 mg/L, & TSS < 50-100
mg/L) varies between 1.5-2.0 US$/m3, while for tertiary
treatment (BOD, TSS & TN < 10 mg/L) it is 2.0-2.5 US$/m3.
The additional burden is approximately 25-33 % which
matches with Indian experience as well.
5. In recent years, many STPs are constructed based on

effluent BOD, TSS & TN < 10 mg/L) and all the well operated
and maintained STPs are providing the desired effluent
quality. Some of these STPs are monitored by lIT Roorkee in
recent years under several research projects and NGT reports.
The performance evaluation results for 20 MGD Nilothi STP, 20
MLD Pappan Kalan STP, 15 MLD Delhi Gate STP and 5 MGD
Kapashera STP of Delhi submitted to NGT alongwith 3.0 MID
8
STP, Rishikesh, 1 MGD STP, Delhi, 27 MGD STP, Haridwar
etc., monitored under various research projects is attached as
Annexure 3.
6. CPCB has also conducted study on technological

achievability of proposed standards. Delhi Jal Board has
installed and commissioned 04 STPs on advanced treatment
technology along with coliform reduction facilities.
7. In addition, the following STPs all over India are producing

the desired quality: 1.5 MLD STP, Cubbon Park, Bangalore,
2.0 MLD STP, Pahalgam, 3.5 MLD STP, Tapovan, Rishikesh,
4.0 MLD STP, IIT' Madras, 12.5 MLD STP, Tonca, Goa, 15.0
MLD STP, Gorakhpur, 17.3 MLD STP, Zirakpur, Punjab, 18
MLD STP, Sarai, Haridwar, 20.0 MLD STP, Hyderabad, 20.0
MLD Sangvi, Pune, 30 MLD STP, Hyderabad, 37.5 MLD STP,
UP Housing Board, Lucknow, 40.0 MLD Kharadi, Pune, 40.0
MLD STP, Hubbali, Karnataka, 45 MLD STP, Mundhwa, Pune,
50 MLD STP Kalamboli, Navi Mumbai, 54 MLD STP, Noida,
55.0 MLD, Singanpure, Surat, 56 MLD STP, Indirapuram,
Ghaziabad, 68.0 MLD STP, Dehradun, 100 MLD STP, Vashi
Navi Mumbai, 130 MLD STP, Nagpur, 137 MLD STP, Greater
Noida, 245 MLD STP Indore, etc.
8. In practical experience with actual tendered cost, the
experience has been quite differing. Many tenders based on
old and less stringent quality standards have been awarded
at much higher per MLD cost as compared to STPs having
more stringent standards. Plus on a long term basis, new
technologies have lower life cycle costs. Other factors which
are encouraging most corporations and contractors to adopt
new technologies are more compact designs, less land
requirement, less construction time, better material of
construction, less maintenance cost, automation and less
dependency on expensive trained manpower to operate plants
in remote locations.”
9
9. Accordingly, the Committee further observed that:
“● The new stringent standards are devised considering the

deterioration condition of water bodies and unavailability of
adequate dilution water in our water bodies. If not stringent
quality standards are not implemented then in the coming
future with more population burden on rivers, situation will
further deteriorate.
● The greatest benefit of these standards is to achieve all
purpose non-portable reuse quality effluent. Each STP is to
be treated as a source of water for reuse and recycling,
helping in mitigating drought/climate change in the country.
It will also reduce exploitation of groundwater reserves and
dependency on rainfall which has become quite
unpredictable in the past few years. Climate change is a
reality that should be addressed and adopted for in the
coming future. It will go a long way in reducing agricultural
dependency on bore well water.
● If treatment of wastewater is not carried out with intention
of reuse and recycle expenditure on conveyance/long
distance transport of water/sewage will be much higher.
Even as on toady in many cities cost of conveyance of water
is much higher than the treatment of sewage to make it fit
for most uses including domestic uses. For example the cost
of transporting water from Narmada to fulfil water supply
needs of Indore city (approximately @ Rs. 20/cum) is much
higher than the cost of treating sewage to tertiary level.”
In view of above and severity of depletion of aquatic resources vis-a-
vis the financial aspects related to conveyance and treatment of
water/sewage the committee recommended that the effluent
discharge for STPs to be as follows:
10
“ SI. Industry Parameter Standards
No. s
(Applicable to all mode of disposal)
1 2 3 4
Sewage Mega and Class I Others Deep

Treat- Metropolitan Cities Marine
ment Cities Outfall
Plants
pH 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0
(STPs)
Bio- 10 20 30 30
Chemical
Oxygen
Demand
(BOD)
Total 20 30 50 50
Suspende
d Solids
(TSS)
Chemical 50 100 150 150

Oxygen
Demand
(COD)
Nitrogen- 10 15 - -
Total
Phosphor 1.0 1.0 1.0

us-Total(
For
Discharge
into
Ponds,
Lakes)
Fecal Desireable- Desireab Desireab Desirable-

Coliform 100 le-230 le-1000 1000
(FC) (Most Permissi Permissi
Permissible- Permissibl
Probable ble-
11
Number 230 ble-1000 10,000 e-10,000
per 100
mililiter,
MPN/100
ml
Note:
(i) Mega-Metropolitan Cities have population more than 1 crore,

Metropolitan Cities-Population more than 10 Lakhs and Class-1
Population more than 1 Lakh.
(ii) All value in mg/l except for pH and Fecal Coliform.
(iii) These standards will be applicable for discharge into water bodies
as well as for land disposal/applications.
(iv) These Standards shall apply to all new STPs for which construction
is yet to be initiated.
(v) The existing/under construction STPs shall achieve these
standards within 07 years from the date of notification.
(vi) In case where the marine outfall provides a minimum initial dilution
of 150 times at the point of discharge and a minimum dilution of
1500 times at a point 100m away from discharge point, then norms
for deep sea marine discharge shall be applied.
(vii) Reuse/Recycling of treated effluent shall be encouraged.
(viii) State Pollution Control Boards/Pollution Control Committees may
make these norms more stringent taking into account the local
”
conditions.
10. We have heard Learned Counsel for the parties.
11. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that while the Expert
Committee is fully justified in suggesting parameters as per its report
for Mega-Metropolitan Cities, there is no justification for different and
diluted standards for Class-I cities, Other cities or Deep Marine
Outfall and to that extent the report of the Expert Committee fall
short of the required scientific logic and database. While
12
recommending the diluted standards for Class-I cities, Other cities or
Deep Marine Outfall the Committee has not given any explanation
with regard to the existing pollution load in these areas, the available
systems in place, the efficacy of the systems in terms of meeting of
norms, the population impacted by deteriorating water quality and
likely consequences on health of people if these diluted norms are
permitted. There is no scientific justification offered for diluting the
norms for these areas in which the majority of country’s population
resides. Also such standards we feel must apply not only to new STPs
but also to the existing ones. Further, there is no justification for
non-application of such standards for seven years for existing STPs.
12. Learned Counsel for CPCB and interveners are unable to justify
dilution of standards for areas other than Mega Metropolitan Cities or
for existing STPs.
13. We find that there is no justification for diluted standards for areas
other than Mega and Metropolitan Cities. The water quality standards
are required to be same for the population of major cities or other
cities. No justification has been shown for different standards for
persons living in cities other than Mega and Metropolitan Cities.
Major population of this country will be affected by diluted standards
and only persons in Mega and Metropolitan Cities will have
comparatively better standards without any valid reason or
distinction. We may note that filters, UV filters etc. are facilities
13
mainly available in major cities and not in smaller cities or villages
where the standards are proposed to be diluted.
14. Accordingly, we accept the report of the Expert Committee with the
modification that the standards recommended for Mega and
Metropolitan Cities will also apply to rest of the country. We also
direct that the standards will apply not only for new STPs but also for
existing/under construction STPs without any delay and giving of
seven years time stands disapproved.
MoEF & CC may issue an appropriate Notification in the matter
within one month from today.
The Application is disposed of.
Adarsh Kumar Goel, CP
K. Ramakrishnan, JM
Dr. Nagin Nanda, EM
April 30, 2019

Original Application No. 1069/2018
SN
14
Compliance against remarks by AHEC, IIT, Roorkee (27/03/2019)on Supaul DPR for Interception &
Diversion (I&D) followed by STP (Estimated Cost Rs. 8770.23 Lakhs)
S. No Items Remarks by IIT Roorkee Comments by NEERI

City map (Annexure XII) and Annexure XIII be provided in readable size.
City Map created and attached
as Annexure- 6
City plan does not show spot levels, zones, drains and their outfalls, names
of locations of proposed IPS and STP, lengths/dia/type/RLs of sewers,
capacities of IPS (Mld 2036/2051), notations of rising mains and sewers in The inclusion of details are
legend. Manholes not to be shown in gravity mains. made in city map which is
A schematic diagram of proposed works therefore, be provided showing attached as Annexure- 6
1 General locations of drain outfalls/nala tapping / gravity main or drain / SPS/rising
mains / STP/ dia / lengths / RLs / flow directions/capacities etc.
I&D drawings have been received in 3 parts, Annexure XV, XVI and Revised I& D drawings
XVII. All 3 drawings be combined and provided in a single drawing. included
Annexure I and II not received.
Population, sewage generation, capacity of STP mentioned in table 11 do Revised
not tally with those given in para 7.1 and 8.3. Similar is the case with
number of zones and IPS.
Pipe alignment be also shown on drawing at Annexure XIII.
River Water The town is situated along river Dimra,(6.12) but name of the river shown Revised
2
Quality on the plan is Gajna.
1

A short description of the river be given along with the distance at which it Complied
meets river Ganga.
Actual river quality u/s, d/s of the town be provided along with copies of
actual test reports.
Copies of river water quality, if monitored by CPCB/SPCB, also be Complied
provided.
Floating population not considered. Past data and basis of projected Complied
3
floating population be given
Population
Population projections to be given for base year, 15 and 30 years, Complied
including floating population.
The status of w/s in the town be given in the format, including present The city does not have any
actual water supply in Mld. centralized water supply
Plans of augmentation of w/s be given. scheme. The population
depends on ground water for its
4 Water supply
daily demand using open wells,
bore wells and hand pumps.
Supporting document attached
as Annexure- 7
Infiltration Be considered as per NMCG Guidelines for I&D and STP works, Aug
5
of water in 2018
2

sewers
The DPR has been prepared for I&D of drains but the city plan does not
show the drains discharging sewage into the river.
6 Drains Revised
Number of drains polluting the river is not clear. It appears from para 3
that there are 3 drains
Raw sewage quality has been tested at 2 locations 01 and 02 (Table 7). Marked
Copies of water quality test reports of the drains be provided. Above
locations be marked on the city plan as well.
Raw water quality of the drains does not appear to have been measured as
per NMCG Guidelines for Interception, Diversion and STP Works, Aug There are no specific outfall
2018, according to which samples should be composite and flow and drains. Which has also
Raw sewage
7 proportional, taken on a day in every week for diurnal variation on hourly been confirmed by IIT R team.
quality
basis for at least a month, from the existing drain or sewage outfall. Therefore for design purpose
Considering a 4-week month, three sample days are to be weekdays, samples were collected from
whereas the fourth is to be an off day i.e. Sunday. the available stretches of the
To be measured for pH, temperature, colour, odour, alkalinity, TSS, VSS, drains.
BOD (Total & filtered), COD (Total & filtered), N (NH3, TKN, NO3),
Phosphorus (Ortho-P, T-P), TC, FC, TDS, Cl, Sulphates. For chances of
industrial contamination - Heavy metals, Pesticides (Organo Chlorides,
3

Organo Phosphates, Carbonates), Detergents, other parameters as per type
of industry.
Actual flow in drains polluting/discharging into the river does not appear
to have been measured. It is to be done as per NMCG Guidelines for
Interception, Diversion and STP Works, Aug 2018, according to which There are no specific outfall
actual present flows in drains be recorded in dry weather before the point and drains. The same has been
of outfall into the water body explained in the report along
for at least one month. Samples should be taken on a day in every week with google images and site
Actual for diurnal variation on hourly basis for twenty-four hours. Considering a photographs. Which has also
8
sewage flow four-week month, three sample days are to be taken on weekdays, whereas been confirmed by IIT R team.
the fourth one on an off day i.e. Sunday. Therefore for design purpose
Copy of reports of actual flow measurement of drains be given along with flow based on population and
date of flow measurements and method adopted for the same. proposed water supply of 135
Discharge measurement is not to be carried out by float method which is LPCD has been considered.
not recommended due to its large uncertainty. May be done by V or
rectangular notch.
4

As required under the Guide Lines, design sewage flows need to be
worked out based on norms (on design rate of water supply and projected
population including floating population) and actual discharge in drains
(measured through field investigations) and projected for the design Revised
population in base, 15 and 30 years. Anticipated flow from private bore
wells and infiltration of sub soil water to be added. Higher of the two is to
be adopted for design purposes.
If there is no possibility of increasing the water supply in near future, There are no specific outfall
Design
9 design sewage flows for STPs and E/M works of SPS may be based on and drains. The same has been
sewage flow
current drain flows projected for the design period instead of on computed explained in the report along
flows. Their capacity be increased as and when the rate of water supply with google images and site
and flow in the drains increases. However, suitable provisions in the photographs. Which has also
structure and space will need to be provided in the beginning. been confirmed by IIT R team.
Design discharges be given in table attached. Therefore for design purpose
flow based on population and
proposed water supply of 135
LPCD has been considered.
Interception Cross overflow weir, gates, screens, interception channel, diversion drain,
Complied
10 works grit chamber, proportional flow weir, unobstructed approach for O&M to
(nala be provided.
5

tappings) Description / Hydraulic design of interceptions works of drains showing
various components and levels, not provided.
Interception works to be so provided that they become integral part of the
comprehensive sewerage plan of the town to be taken up later on.
Lengths / dia / material / GLs / ILs of gravity mains be mentioned on the
plan.
Sewer of length 3729 m has been designed for 11.74 Mld against the
sewage generation of 15.14 Mld. Similar is the case with other lengths of
sewers.
Revised
Length of sewer on page 76 is 3729 m but does not tally with estimates.
Intercepting /
Similar is the case with other sections of sewers.
11 Diversion
Minimum velocity in sewers at present and design peak should be 0.6 and
Sewers
0.8 mps and maximum depth of flow to be 0.8 of the diameter at ultimate
peak flow for ventilation.
Hydraulic design of sewers has not been given. The design of I&D sewers
given in DPR is the bill of quantities and not the design. It does not show
present and design peak flows, velocities and water depth etc. at these
flows. The proforma and the design therefore, needs review.
6

The diversion sewers proposed under the DPR should be so designed that
they ultimately become a part of the town’s comprehensive sewerage to be
taken up later on. The sizes and invert levels of sewers shall therefore, be
provided accordingly and for the needs of next 30 years.
To scale site plans of the proposed interception works showing land

available, layout plan of the proposed works and land available for future
expansion should be prepared for each drain.
Hydraulic design of pumping station not provided. The revised version of DPR
Purpose of providing stilling chambers, fine screens, grit chamber on the does not have any pumping
outlet size of both IPS, be clarified. stations. All diversion flows are
DG sets and dedicated feeders to be proposed to deal with power by gravity only.
Sewage interruptions. DG set capacity to be provided for peak flow requirement.
12 Pumping Hydraulic retention time (Volume of wet well below invert of incoming
Stations sewer) shall be adopted as 3.75 minutes of peak flow.
To scale site plans of the proposed pumping stations showing land

available and layout plan of the proposed works and balance available for
future should be prepared.
7

The SPS proposed under the DPR should be so designed that they
ultimately become a part of the town’s comprehensive sewerage to be
taken up later on. The sizes and invert levels shall therefore, be provided
accordingly and for the needs of next 30 years.
Lengths / dia / material of rising mains from 2 IPS have neither been No Rising mains are proposed
mentioned in DPR nor shown on the plan. in revised DPR
Hydraulic design of rising mains not given. No Rising mains are proposed
in revised DPR
Size of rising main selected should be such that to avoid silting, ensuring No Rising mains are proposed
velocities not less than 0.8 m/sec (barest minimum) and not exceeding 3 in revised DPR
m/sec at any time (Para 4.20 ofCPHEEO Manual on Sewerage and
Sewage Treatment Systems Nov 2013).
13 Rising mains
Suitable provision of rising main accessories, wherever needed, such as No Rising mains are proposed
thrust blocks, anchor blocks, expansion joints, scour/drain valves, in revised DPR
air/vacuum release valves and surge protection devices shall be made.
Surge/water hammer analysis shall be calculated.
The rising mains proposed under the DPR should be so designed that they No Rising mains are proposed
ultimately become a part of the town’s comprehensive sewerage to be in revised DPR
taken up later on. The sizes and invert levels shall therefore, be provided
accordingly and for the needs of next 30 years.
8

Seeing the latest effluent parameters, there does not appear to be a need of As discussed the Technology
constructing STP based on SBR or C-tech technology, being costly in neutral considerations have
terms of both capital and O&M. been made.
Costs of STPs constructed elsewhere on latest effluent parameters be given Cost estimates are made with
in support of estimated cost adopted in the DPR. cost per MLD. Also new norms
Cost of STPs be given including the cost of office building, campus as per the recent NGT order are
development, boundary, water supply, drainage, sewerage, internal and considered while considering
external electrification, SCADA and online monitoring. the costs.
Life cycle cost analysis to be given based on adopted treated sewage
parameters and land area. Basis of costs adopted in LCC analysis (4.6.3) Plans for reuse and recycle of
14 STPs
be given. EM works need replacement after about 15 years. Reasons for treated water to be confirmed
providing 6 years replacement be given by ULB or BUIDCO
Existing and future plan of reuse / recycling of treated waste water from
STPs to be given.
Treated effluent has been proposed to be discharged into the river. Reuse
of at least 20% of treated effluent is mandatory.
The production of biogas and its use for power generation to be Production of Bio-gas etc will
considered. depend on the technology
DG sets to be considered for STPs also so that they can be operated suggested by vendor at
continuously. tendering stage. Currently DPR
9

is technology neutral.
Land to be arranged for ultimate requirement.

Status of availability of land to be given on a statement showing land
required for ultimate needs (of interception works, SPS, STPs and other
works), land available, name / written consent of the owner, balance
Land To be confirmed by BUIDCO
15 required, funds required for acquisition, provision made in the DPR.
acquisition and Supaul Nagar Parishad.
To scale site plans of all the proposed works showing land available and
layout plan of the proposed works and balance available for future should
be prepared. Layout plan of the proposed works for future needs be also
shown in the balance land, in support of the adequacy of the same.
Soil investigation should be carried out at all major sites such as deep Soil report will be submitted at
Soil
16 sewers, SPS, STPs. Soil investigation report should include soil later stage for structural design
investigation
description, characteristics, bearing capacity etc. purpose
Copy of estimate of power connection be provided in support of provision Data to be provided by
Power made for power connection. BUIDCO
17
Hrs. of availability of power at the sites of SPS / STPs be given To be confirmed by BUIDCO
O&M cost to be worked out for 15 years of commissioning of works
18 O&M Average annual repair and maintenance cost may be taken as 1% of the Included in O&M
capital works.
10

Annual O&M cost beyond 1st year to be worked out by compounding Revised
present cost with general price index / inflation which has been taken as
5% on Manpower and 2% on Chemicals. However, no escalation is to be
considered on power and diesel, as these costs shall be reimbursed on
actual basis by NMCG.
Net O&M cost to be worked out after considering recovery of resources No recovery has been
from treated sewage, bio gas, power generation, sewage sludge etc. considered presently.
11

OM Cost be provided in the following format, supported by details Included in DPR
S
Items Annual O&M cost, Rs. lacs
N
Interce Rising
Sewer SPS STPs Total
ptions Mains
1 Staff
Repairs
and
2
maintn.
@1%
3 Power
4 DG Sets
5 Chemicals
Online
6 monitoring
system
7 Others
Total
Annual
Cost
O&M cost
for 15
years
Industrial Information to be collected from PCB about list of industries in the project Supaul town does not have any
19
Pollution area, nature of industries, mode of treatment by them, location of CETPs, industries or CETPs as per
12

points of disposal of untreated / treated effluents by them etc. Annexure- 7.
Non Point No proposals have been framed to deal with non-point sources of pollution
20 Sources of viz: dairies, garages, cattle wallowing, carcass disposal, dhobi ghats, etc.
Pollution
Proposals be given for community toilet complexes, crematoria, river front The required work was not
21 Misc. Works development works, afforestation, mentioned under the scope of
study.
Implementati Names of agencies for implementation and O&M to be given along with a Shall be furnished by BUIDCO
22 on and O&M brief background note on the same
agencies
Completion
23 Implementation schedule be given along with PERT chart
period
SOR adopted be intimated NO SOR is used, as the DPR is
Schedule of
24 Latest SOR prepared by Indian Society of Trenchless Technology now technology neutral there
rates
(IndSTT) to be adopted for sewers proposed by trenchless technology. are no specific designs or BOQ.
Abstract of Be given as per the attached proforma. Costs be given in Rs. lakh, up to 2 Included
25
Cost decimal places only.
26 Not charged. It may be confirmed that the estimated costs, are inclusive of GST @12%is included
GST
GST.
27 Contingencie Not permissible as a separate item as they are covered in centage. Not included
13

s
Drawings
A single map, on large scale, be provided showing GLs, land marks, NS
line, rivers, drains polluting the river, their points of outfall, directions of
flows, proposed SPS, STPs (with Mld, type), intercepting / diversion
drains/sewers (with direction of flow, dia/length/material, GLs/ILs at
junctions), effluent sewers, municipal limits.
Drawings of interception works showing levels be provided.
L-sections of intercepting/diversion sewers to show GLs/ ILs/ dia / length /
type of sewers, profile of ground and sewers.
Proposed
28 Drawings of proposed SPS, showing broad dimensions, RLs etc. be Included and revised
Works
provided.
To scale site plans of all proposed works (including nala interceptions)
showing land available and layout plan of the proposed works and balance
available for future need to be provided.
Outline drawings of recommended STP technology structure covering
hydraulic flow and levels
Plan of the city also to show locations of industries, CETPs and points of,
untreated / treated effluent outfalls of industries, etc.
29 Contour Contour plan of the city in appropriate scale and contour interval, to show Complied
14

Maps existing/proposed water supply sources, WTPs, SPS, STPs to indicate
their RLs.
Replies and information asked for be provided in WORD / Excel and not
Revised
30 pdf.
DPR
All costs be provided in Rs. lakh, up to 2 decimal places only.
15
Table: Status of water supply in the town / project area

Items Installed capacity, Water Remarks
Mld supplied, Mld
Sources of water supply
Surface (Describe source wise)
Tube wells (nos.)
Hand Pumps (nos.)
Total, Mld
Private bore wells (nos.)
Total including private bore wells, Mld
Water supply required for the town as per
GoI guidelines, lpcd
lpcd for which present water supply
project has been designed
Base year Population of the town
Water supplied on base year population
(excluding bore wells), lpcd
Water supply on base year population
including bore wells, lpcd
Plans for augmentation of water supply
Table: Abstract of Cost of Works Proposed

(CW = Civil Works; EM = Electrical and Mechanical Works)(Already prepared)
SN Items Quantities Estimated Cost, Remarks
Rs. lakh
CW EM Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
A Items on which centage is
admissible
16

Rs. lakh
CW EM Total
1 Interception of drains
(nala tappings), nos.
2 Interception/Diversion Sewers
Sewers by open trench method,
mm/km
3 Intermediate Pumping
Stations (IPS) Mld 30/15 years
IPS -1 at -----
IPS-2 at ----
Sub Total SPS
4 Rising Mains,
From IPS-1, mm/km
From IPS-2, mm/km
Sub Total Rising Mains
5 STPs , including office building,
lab & equipment, campus
development, boundary wall,
water supply, drainage,
sewerage, internal & external
electrification, SCADA and
Online monitoring system etc.
----Mld, at -----
Sub Total STPs
6 Treated effluent disposal,
mm/km
7 Reuse of treated effluent
8 Staff quarters, nos.
9 Special T&P
10 Others (specify)
17

Rs. lakh
CW EM Total
Sub Total (A) Basic Capital
Cost
B Centage
Cost of project preparation @
4% as per NGRBA guidelines
(maximum)
Cost of project supervision @
4% as per NGRBA guidelines
(maximum)
Sub Total B
C Items on which no centage is
admissible
O&M cost for 1st15 years
(After reducing cost of power
available from Solar Power Plant
and Micro Hydro Power Plant)
Power connection
Land acquisition
Solar power plant to improve
sustainability
(after reducing subsidy from
MNRE)
Micro Hydro Power Plant
(after reducing subsidy from
MNRE)
Environmental Sanitation and
Management Plan (ESAMP)
Communication & Public
Outreach
18

Rs. lakh
CW EM Total
Governance and Accountability
Plan (GAPP)
Labour cess as applicable
Others (specify)
Sub Total C
Total Cost of project A+B+C
Design Flows(prepared accordingly)
Design discharge, Mld

Zone Computed Computed Projected Projected Nala Intercepting Gravity SPS SPS Rising STP
discharge in discharge flow of flow of tappings / Diversion mains CW EM mains
2035, based in 2050, drains in drains in drains works
on based on 2035, 2050, Mld
P*135*0.8, P*135*0.8, Mld
Mld Mld
Total
Note: As flows in drains are too less than computed flows, EM works of SPS and STP be provided based on projected flows of drains for 2035,
other works may be based on computed flows for 2050.
19
Compliance report on site visit observations made by students of IIT Roorkee
S. No Observation by IIT - Roorkee Compliance

1 There are total three outfalls in the city located near The condition was similar during the
the proposed STP site adjacent to Supaul Engineering site visit of NEERI in Oct, 2018. The
College, near BSS College and near Navodaya drains were overflowing at several
Vidyalay on Pipra Road. locations as observed by IIT-R and
flow measurement was not possible
Outfall 1 (near Supaul Engineering College, Ward in that condition. The same is
24) - The outfall is not lined and whole sewage is mentioned in DPR as well.
flowing in open land in the low lying areas.
Outfall 2 (near BSS College, Ward 2) - The outfall is

not lined and whole sewage is flowing in Gajna
River.
Outfall 3 (near Navodaya Vidyalay, Ward 5) - The

outfall is not lined and whole sewage is flowing in
open land in the low lying areas.
2 The site proposed for STP is near the Outfall 1 In the latest version of DPR
adjacent to Supaul Engineering College and IPS is submitted on 04-07-2019, the
proposed at remaining two outfalls. As per the visit, scheme is revised with decentralized
the proposed sites for IPS matches with locations STPs and no pumping stations.
mentioned in Figure 12 & 13 of Section 7.1 and does The details of Interception of drains,
not match with the location shown in Map Diversion of Sewers, proposed STP
(Annexure- XII). locations, treated water discharge
lines etc., may please be referred
The intercepting sewer from outfall 2 is proposed with the latest version of DPR.
along the railway line to STP through rising main
with an approximate length of 2.5 kms. The
intercepting sewer from outfall 3 is proposed along
the canal (which is flowing through the city from the
direction of north-east to south) through rising main
with an approximate length of 5.75 kms.
3 The proposed land of STP measures approximately The proposed sites are marked with
105 m x 55 m. There is an uncompleted construction GPS coordinates along with area
of a structure built in the middle of the proposed site details in the latest version of DPR
named Samrat Ashok Bhawan. submitted 04-07-2019.
The effluent from STP is proposed to be discharged
into the canal flowing 1 km south of the site.
4 During discussion with EO, it came to our knowledge Agreed. When NEERI had conducted
that for the water supply as per CPHEEO, the the initial phase of site visit to Supaul
pipelines has already been laid and will be initiated in the month of Oct,2018 the same
by December 2019. He also further stated that the was informed by EO, Supaul. The
supply will be done for roughly 6 hours throughout water supply scheme is not yet
the day, 3 each during morning and evening. commissioned for the town till date.
During a recent meeting of NEERI
with BUIDCO and SPMG officials
Compliance report on site visit observations made by students of IIT Roorkee
along with IIT-R, on 29 May 2019 at

BUIDCO office, Patna, NEERI had
conveyed the same details and
hence 135 lpcd is considered as per
capita water demand in DPR, as
details were provided by EO, Supaul
and ULB officials and also that no
water supply scheme implemented
yet. To which, BUIDCO and SPMG
officials in the presence of IIT-R had
convincingly told that Supaul town
does have water supply scheme in
existence. Now as per IIT-R site visit
and observation, it is evident that at
present the water supply scheme is
not yet implemented. Hence in the
DPR per capita water demand is
considered as per the information
provided by EO Supaul. The
supporting details are attached as
Annexure- 7 in the latest version of
DPR submitted 04-07-2019.
5 As told by the visiting officers from BUIDCO and In the earlier versions of DPR,
EO, there are possibility of availability of suitable Decentralized STPs were proposed
land for decentralized STPs at near outfall 2 and 3. for Supaul town, however prior to
the Third Party Review by IIT-R, The
SPMG, Patna had requested NEERI to
propose centralized STP only with
Pumping Stations. Since SPMG had
insisted, the DPR was revised with a
centralized STP and two IPS. Now
again based on IIT-R (Third Party)
suggestions for proposing scheme
with decentralized STPs for Supaul
due to several other reasons like
maintenance difficulties for pumping
station, once again the DPR is revised
with decentralized STPs at 4
locations, where the flow of sewage
after I&D is by gravity only. The latest
version of DPR was submitted on 04-
07-2019.
6 As per the information collected during site visit and - Compliance not applicable -
from the DPR about IPS, STP, intercepting sewers,
rising main, and their length a not to scale flow
diagram is attached below.
B
Sluice Gate
A A
Plan Manhole
B Sluice Gate
Bar Screen
G.L
G.L
Sluice Gate
INLET
OUTLET
Section A-A Section B-B

CSIR - NEERI
INTERCEPTION PIT
Interception Pit ZONE

PROJECT
:
:
1
SUPAUL
ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METER
B
Sluice Gate
A A
Plan B
Manhole Sluice Gate
Bar Screen
G.L
G.L
Sluice Gate
INLET
OUTLET

CSIR - NEERI
INTERCEPTION PIT
Interception Pit Zone

PROJECT
:
:
2
SUPAUL
Sluice Gate
A A
Manhole Sluice Gate

Plan
Bar Screen
G.L
G.L
Sluice Gate
INLET
OUTLET

CSIR - NEERI
INTERCEPTION PIT - 3A-3B

PROJECT
:
:
3
SUPAUL
Sluice Gate
A A
Plan
Manhole Sluice Gate
G.L G.L
Sluice Gate
INLET
OUTLET
Section A-A CSIR - NEERI
Section B-B INTERCEPTION PIT - 3B-3C

PROJECT
:
:
3
SUPAUL
Sluice Gate
A A
Manhole
Plan Sluice Gate
G.L G.L
INLET
OUTLET
CSIR - NEERI
INTERCEPTION PIT - 3C-STP3

Section A-A Section B-B ZONE : 3
PROJECT : SUPAUL
Sluice Gate
A A
Manhole Sluice Gate

Plan
Bar Screen
G.L
G.L
Sluice Gate
INLET
OUTLET
Section B-B
Section A-A
CSIR - NEERI
Interception Pit INTERCEPTION PIT

ZONE
PROJECT
:
:
4
SUPAUL
B B
Circular RCC Cover
A A
Manhole Plan
Circular RCC Cover
G.L G.L G.L G.L
Brick Wall
PCC PCC
PCC PCC
CSIR - NEERI
Diversion Sewer
DIVERSION SEWER - 1700M
FROM ZONE 1 TO STP 1
PROJECT : SUPAUL
B B
Circular RCC Cover
A A
Manhole Plan
Circular RCC Cover
G.L G.L G.L G.L
Sand/Earth Filling
Brick Wall
PCC PCC
PCC PCC
Section B-B
CSIR - NEERI
Section A-A
DIVERSION SEWER - 1777M
Diversion Sewer FROM ZONE 2 TO STP 1
PROJECT : SUPAUL
Circular RCC Cover
A A
Manhole Plan
Circular RCC Cover
G.L G.L G.L G.L
Sand/Earth Filling
Brick Wall
PCC PCC
PCC PCC
Section B-B
CSIR - NEERI
Section A-A
DIVERSION SEWER - 277m(3A-3B)
Diversion Sewer ZONE : 3
PROJECT : SUPAUL
Circular RCC Cover
A A
Manhole Plan
Circular RCC Cover
G.L G.L G.L G.L
Sand/Earth Filling
Brick Wall
PCC PCC
PCC PCC
Section B-B CSIR - NEERI
Section A-A DIVERSION SEWER - 956M(3B-3C)

ZONE : 3
Diversion Sewer PROJECT : SUPAUL
Circular RCC Cover
A A
Circular RCC Cover

Manhole Plan
G.L G.L G.L G.L
Sand/Earth Filling
Brick Wall
PCC PCC
PCC PCC
Section B-B CSIR - NEERI
Section A-A DIVERSION SEWER - 1000M(3C-STP3)

ZONE : 3
Diversion Sewer PROJECT : SUPAUL
Circular RCC Cover
A A
Manhole Plan
Circular RCC Cover
G.L G.L G.L G.L
Brick Wall
PCC PCC
PCC PCC

CSIR- NEERI
Diversion Sewer DIVERSION SEWER:37 m

ZONE : 4
PROJECT : SUPAUL
Circular RCC Cover
A A
Manhole Plan
Circular RCC Cover
G.L G.L G.L G.L
Brick Wall
PCC PCC
PCC PCC
CSIR- NEERI
Treated Water Discharge Line
TREATED WATER DISCHARGE LINE - 680M
STP : 1
PROJECT : SUPAUL
Circular RCC Cover
A A
Manhole Plan
Circular RCC Cover
G.L G.L G.L G.L
Brick Wall
PCC PCC
PCC PCC
Section B-B
Section A-A
CSIR- NEERI
TREATED WATER DISCHARGE LINE - 100M

Treated Water Discharge Line STP : 2
PROJECT : SUPAUL
Circular RCC Cover
A A
Manhole Plan
Circular RCC Cover
G.L G.L G.L G.L
Brick Wall
PCC PCC
PCC PCC

CSIR- NEERI
Treated Water Discharge Line TREATED WATER DISCHARGE LINE - 120M

STP : 3
PROJECT : SUPAUL
ENTRANCE GATE
PLAN
ROAD MARGINE 3.00 M ROAD MARGINE 3.00 M ROAD MARGINE 3.00 M ROAD MARGINE 3.00 M
6.00
19.50 19.50 19.50

ROAD MARGINE 3.00 M
ROAD MARGINE 3.00 M

CONTROL ROOM 6.00
CENTRIFUGE 12
13.60
FINE SCREEN
GRIT CHAMBER 3 OIL & GREASE CHAMBER 4 11 SLUDGE HOLDING TANK
CHAMBER 1 SBR -1 6 SBR -2 6
4.20 9.70 10.00 19.00 19.00 19.00
TREATED WATER TANK
10 13.60
3.00 3.00 3.00
18.00 21.50
3.00
13.60
4.20
COARSE
ACF ACF ACF ACF
SCREEN 1
CHAMBER 9 9 9 9
PSF PSF PSF PSF

18.00 8 8 8 8
21.60
SBR -1 6 SBR -2 6
19.00 19.00
CHLORINE CONTACT TANK CUM FILTER FEED TANK 7 20.00
ROAD MARGINE 3.00 M
ROAD MARGINE 3.00 M

18.00
INTAKE WELL 2
21.50 19.50 19.50
EQUILIZATION TANK 5 20.00
ROAD MARGINE 3.00 M ROAD MARGINE 3.00 M ROAD MARGINE 3.00 M
CAPACITY-8.9 MLD
SR. NO. OF LENGTH (m) FREE BOARD TOTAL VOLUME
LVL. (+5.00) LVL. (+5.00) TANK DETAILS WIDTH (m) DEPTH (m) AREA (Sq.m)
NO. TANK (m) DEPTH (m) (Cum)
LVL. (+4.00) LVL. (+4.00)
1 Coarse Screen Chamber 1 4.200 3.000 1.600 0.300 1.900 12.900 20.640
LVL. (+3.00) OC
CDP-01
LVL. (+3.00)
2 Intake Well 1 18 18 5.000 0.500 5.500 330.000 1650
AC
AC
LVL. (+2.00) 3.00 LVL. (+2.00)

1 Fine Screen Chamber 1 4.200 3.000 1.600 0.300 1.900 12.900 20.640
NRV
NRV
CHLORINATION
LVL. (+1.00) 1.60 LVL. (+1.00)
IV
IV
ACF 2.00 3 Grit Chamber 2 9.700 1.400 2.500 0.300 2.800 27.500 69
2.50 2.80
PSF
GROUND LVL.(0.00) FINE SCREEN SBR -1 & SBR-2 CENTRIFUGE GROUND LVL.(0.00)
FFP-1 FFP-2
4.00 4 Oil & Grease Chamber 1 10.000 3.000 5.000 0.300 5.300 27.500 137.500
CHAMBER
LVL. (-1.00) GRIT CHAMBER 5.00 5.00 SLUDGE HOLDING TANK LVL. (-1.00)
CHLORINE 5 Equilization Tank 1 21.600 21.500 5.000 0.300 5.300 468.720 2250
LVL. (-2.00) SUBMERSIBLE
PUMP CONTACT TANK LVL. (-2.00)
CUM FILTER FEED 6 SBR-I 2 19.500 19.000 3.000 0.300 3.300 750 2250
LVL. (-3.00)
SLP-2
M
SLP-1
M
FINAL TREATED WATER TANK LVL. (-3.00)
1.60 TANK
OIL & GREASE CHAMBER EQUILIZATION TANK
6 SBR-II 2 19.500 19.000 3.000 0.300 3.300 750 2250
LVL. (-4.00) LVL. (-4.00)
COARSE SCREEN 7 Chlorine Contact Tank 1 20.000 20.000 2.800 0.300 3.100 401.800 1125
LVL. (-5.00) CHAMBER 5.00 LVL. (-5.00)
8 PSF
LVL. (-6.00) LVL. (-6.00)
9 ACF
SUBMERSIBLE
PUMP
LVL. (-7.00) SLP-2

M
SLP-1
M
LVL. (-7.00)
INTAKE WELL
10 Treated Water Tank 1 13.600 13.600 4.000 0.300 4.300 187.500 750
LVL. (-8.00) LVL. (-8.00)
11 Sludge Holding Tank 1 19.500 19.000 2.000 0.300 2.300 375.000 750
HYDRAULIC DRAWING 12 Centrifuge
NATIONAL ENVIORNMENTAL
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
ENGINEERING RESEARCH
LEGEND INSTITUTE
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
SBR BASED SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
SEWAGE FLOW CAPACITY
LEGEND
SLUDGE FLOW
CAPACITY : 8.9 MLD
N
8.9 MLD
WATER FLOW
PROJECT : SUPAUL
ALL DIMENSION ARE IN METER
0.25
11
0.25
10
1900 KLD 8
All Dimensions in m 7
68.50 69.00
0.6 0.6 0.6
0.45 0.45
3 0.45
0.6
0.6 0.45
0.15
0.45
0.6 0.6 0.6
0.45 0.45
2 0.45
2
0.6
15.80 16.30
A 0.45
0.6 0.6 0.6
0.25
13.00
0.45 0.45 0.45
2.50
1.80
A
4.60
5.10
7.90
8.40
0.6 0.6
1 0.6
1 0.6
6.00 6.00
SCREEN CHAMBER OIL & GREESE TRAP 0.45 0.45 0.45
0.45
0.6
0.45
24.60 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

0.25
16.10 2.95 2.95 2.95 2.95 2.95 2.95 0.80 25.30 8.00
2.95 2.95
25.80
8.50
INTAKE WELL SETTLER TANK

PHYTORID TANK TREATED WATER TANK
0.20 PERFORATED PIPE PERFORATED PIPE

0.30
0.15 0.15
1.00 0.30 0.15
2.10 2.20 2.20 0.30

1.65
1.40
1.98 1.76 1.76
0.15
GL GL GL
2.80
3.00 0.15 2.30
1.68 3.00
5.30 9.00 1.98
5.50 1.98
5.70 0.28 2.68
2.38 0.80
2.80
SCREEN CHAMBER OIL & GREESE TRAP 0.10
0.20
3.53
CSIR - NEERI
27.78
25.30
16.10
25.50
25.70 8.90
9.10
16.80 PHYTORID TANK
17.00
17.20
SETTLER TANK TREATED WATER TANK Phytorid Technology based STP
INTAKE WELL
STP : 2
SECTION A-A Capacity : 1.9MLD
PROJECT : Supaul
25.6
0.25
0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
0.15 0.15
6.0
0.25
1100 KLD 6.0
All Dimensions in m 0.25
31.3 6.0
0.25
6.0 44.0
0.25
6.0
21.7 0.25
0.6 0.6 0.6
6.0 6.0
0.45 0.45 0.45
0.25 0.25
12.8
A 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6

2.5
0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
A
1.8
6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
5.0 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
3.7
0.25
SCREEN OIL & GREESE 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
20.2 CHAMBER TRAP 12.2
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 0.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 0.8
INTAKE WELL 21.7 25.4
TREATED WATER TANK

SETTLER TANK PHYTORID TANK
PERFORATED PIPE PERFORATED PIPE PERFORATED PIPE
0.15
0.3 0.15
1.3 2.2 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.68 1.76 1.68 1.76 1.68 1.76 1.68 1.76
GL GL GL GL
2.8 2.3 2.3

1.68 1.68 1.68 2.8
4.8 6.1 1.98 1.98 1.98
2.8 SCREEN OIL & GREESE

CHAMBER TRAP 25.6
20.2 22.5 0.28
13.3
PHYTORID TANK
0.10
0.20
20.2
21.1
0.28
0.10
0.20
SETTLER TANK TREATED WATER TANK
21.3
INTAKE WELL
NATIONAL ENVIORNMENTAL
ENGINEERING RESEARCH
INSTITUTE
SECTION A-A Phytorid Based Sewage Treatment Plant
LEGEND
CAPACITY : 1.1 MLD
N
PROJECT : Supaul

Supaul Final DPR

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Supaul Final DPR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Detailed Project Report

Bihar Urban Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd,

CSIR- National Environmental Engineering Research Institute

2 PROJECT AREA ...................................................................................................................................... 10

2.1 STATE AND DISTRICT .............................................................................................................................. 10

7 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................... 36

11 DESIGN CRITERIA .................................................................................................................................. 39

11.1 CATEGORIZATION OF TOWNS ON THE BASIS OF I&D AND TREATMENT INFRASTRUCTURE..................................... 39

12 TREATED EFFLUENT QUALITY ................................................................................................................ 52

14.1 O&M FOR INTERCEPTION AND DIVERSION SEWERS ................................................................................... 54

15 POPULATION GROWTH PROJECTIONS .................................................................................................. 57

15.1 ARITHMETIC INCREASE METHOD (AS PER CPHEEO MANUAL) ..................................................................... 57

16 DESIGN YEARS ...................................................................................................................................... 71

21.1 NALLAH INTERCEPTION & DIVERSION WORKS .......................................................................................... 79

22 LAND REQUIREMENT ............................................................................................................................ 91

25.1 COST ABSTRACT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 92

26 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN............................................................................................. 212

26.1 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS- SUPAUL .................................................................................. 212

27 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................... 220

Annexure 1- Aerial View of Supaul District and City Boundary

Annexure 2- Ganga River Map of Bihar State

Annexure 4- Contour Map of Supaul

Annexure 5- Supaul Drain Map

Annexure 6- City Map showing proposed I&D and STP Schemes

Annexure 8- Site Visit Report by IIT- R

Annexure 9- MOEF & CC STP Discharge Norms

Annexure 10- NGT Order for STP Discharge Norms

Annexure 11 A to 11 B- Compliance Report

Annexure 12 A to 12 F- Interceptor Drawings

Annexure 13 A to 13 F- Diversion Sewer Drawings

Annexure 14 A to 14 C - Treated Water Discharge Line Drawings

Annexure 15 A to 15 C – Sewage Treatment Plant Drawing

The Bihar Urban Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd (BUIDCO), Government of

2.1 State and District

Figure 1 Aerial View of Supaul

Figure 2 Location of Supaul District

2.3 Climate and Rainfall

2.4 Transport Connectivity

2.5 Tourism and Cultural Importance

2.6 Forest and Wildlife

2.7 Soil and Agriculture

2.8 Land Use and Land cover

Figure 3 LU/LC classification of Supaul Town

Table 1 Land Use Pattern

Sr. No. Landuse Area in km2 Percentage

Name Supaul District Supaul town

Figure 4 Bar Chart representation of population growth in Supaul

Table 3 Historical Population of Supaul Town

Year Population of Town

Ward No. Population Household Ward No. Population Household

Ward No. Population Household Ward No. Population Household

4 Pollution of River by Supaul Town

Table 5 Location and Water Quality analysis results of River Gajna

Monitoring Sites of River Gajna

Latitude 26.142221 26.118891 26.131473 26.125619

BOD, Total (mg/l) 78 85 103

DO (mg/l) 3.6 2.8 1.7

TDS 283 297 315

Figure 5 Ganga River Map in Bihar

Uttar Pradesh Phase-I

Bihar Phase-III (UP Border

West Bengal Phase-IV

Total 58 168 151 10,612.51 427.97

Priority Drains Priority Drains