Professional Documents
Culture Documents
+ ENGLISH
If this depiction of space is correct, then like any computer, there is an inherent limit to the
universe’s data storage and processing capacity.
By Maddie Stone
If a friend told you that we were all living in a giant hologram, you'd
probably tell him to lay off the kush. But incredibly, physicists across the
world are thinking the same thing: That what we perceive to be a three-
dimensional universe might just be the image of a two-dimensional one,
projected across a massive cosmic horizon.
:
Yes, it sounds more than a little insane. The 3D nature of our world is as
fundamental to our sense of reality as the fact that time runs forward. And
yet some researchers believe that contradictions between Einstein's theory
of relativity and quantum mechanics might be reconciled if every three-
dimensional object we know and cherish is a projection of tiny, subatomic
bytes of information stored in a two-dimensional Flatland.
ADVERTISEMENT
"If this is true, it's a really important insight," Daniel Grumiller, a theoretical
physicist at the Vienna University of Technology, told me over the phone.
Grumiller, along with physicists Max Riegler, Arjun Bagchi and Rudranil
Basu, recently published the very first study offering evidence that the so-
called "holographic principle"—that certain 3D spaces can be
mathematically reduced to 2D projections—might describe our universe.
:
Oops, we couldn’t
Play find that track.
on SoundCloud
Listen in browser
Privacy policy
[In our podcast, the Motherboard staff talks to Craig Hogan, the Fermilab
scientist who is actually performing these experiments.]
"If you asked anyone twenty years ago how many dimensions our world has,
most of us would answer 'three spatial dimensions plus time,'" he said. "The
holographic principle would mean that this is actually a matter of
perspective."
ADVERTISEMENT
:
For Palestinian artist, Ismai…
"Anti-de Sitter space is not directly relevant to our universe, but it allows us
to perform calculations that would otherwise be very difficult if not
impossible," Grumiller said.
Within this theoretical space, Maldacena showed that two sets of physical
equations mapped perfectly onto each other: The equations of gravitational
theory, and those of quantum field theory. This correspondence was totally
unexpected, because while gravity is described in three spatial dimensions,
quantum field theory requires only two. That the laws of physics produced
identical results two or three dimensions pointed to anti-de Sitter-space's
holographic nature.
:
"This was the first instance where somebody explicitly showed how
holography works," Grumiller told me. "But given that our universe is not
anti-de Sitter space—it's approximately flat at large scales—it's interesting
to ask whether the holographic principle applies to flat space, as well."
ADVERTISEMENT
"This calculation affirms our assumption that the holographic principle can
also be realized in flat spaces," said Riegler in a press release. "It is evidence
for the validity of this correspondence in our universe."
FERMILAB SCIENTIST AARON CHOU, LEFT, AND VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY GRADUATE STUDENT BRITTANY KAMAI
CHECK ON THE HOLOMETER DEVICE USED TO TEST WHETHER THE UNIVERSE IS A 2D HOLOGRAM. IMAGE:
FERMILAB
If the holographic principle does indeed describe our universe, it could help
resolve many inconsistencies between relativistic physics and quantum
:
physics, including the black hole information paradox. It would also offer
researchers a way to solve some very tough quantum problems using
relatively simple gravitational equations. But before we can be sure that
we're living in the Matrix, there's still a lot of work to be done.
"We did this calculation using 3D gravitational theory and 2D quantum field
theory, but the universe actually has three spatial dimensions plus time,"
Grumiller said. "A next step is to generalize these considerations to include
one higher dimension. There are also many other quantities that should
correspond between gravitational theory and quantum field theory, and
examining these correspondences is ongoing work."
ADVERTISEMENT
So. If this depiction of space is correct, then like any computer, there is an
inherent limit to the universe's data storage and processing capacity.
What's more, that limit should bear telltale signatures—so-called
"holographic noise"—that we can measure.
ADVERTISEMENT
:
Related: Nick Bostrom Says the Universe Is a Simulation, Twitter Bots
Suggest Otherwise
Reality's bandwidth fuzz, if you will, is exactly what Hogan's lab is now
trying to measure, using an instrument called the Holometer, which is
basically a really big and powerful laser pointer.
The actual experiment that will decipher this involves measuring the
relative positions of large mirrors separated by 40 meters, using two
Michelson laser interferometers with a precision 1 billion times smaller than
an atom. If, as according to the holographic noise hypothesis, information
about the positions of the two mirrors is finite, then the researchers should
ultimately hit a limit in their ability to resolve their respective positions.
"What happens then?" Lanza said. "We expect to simply measure noise, as if
the positions of the optics were dancing around, not able to be pinned
down with more precision. So in the end, the experimental signature we are
looking for is an irreducible noise floor due to the universe not actually
:
storing more information about the positions of the mirrors."
The team is currently collecting and analyzing data, and expects to have
their first results by the end of the year. Lanza told me they are encouraged
by the fact that their instruments have achieved by far the best sensitivity
ever to gravitational waves at high frequencies.
ADVERTISEMENT
So, it seems that for now, we'll have to wait for the physicists doing the
hard math and shooting the lasers to tell us whether our lives are just a very
sophisticated illusion. In the meanwhile, the big question on my mind is,
how the heck will such a revelation affect us?
:
"This knowledge won't impact our everyday lives, in the same way that
knowing about the Big Bang or other galaxies does not change our everyday
lives," Grumiller said.
"But in the same way that knowing that the universe started with a Big Bang
has profoundly changed our view of the universe, knowing that the universe
is like a big hologram is a profound insight."
Perhaps the only thing we can say with any certainty is this: If our universe
is a simulation, it's probably as close to a perfect one as we can ever hope to
achieve. In that sense, living in the Matrix doesn't sound so bad, after all.
MORE
FROM VICE
Tech
02.16.24
Tech
Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran Used GPT for 'Malicious
Cyber Activities', OpenAI Says
JULES ROSCOE
02.16.24
Tech
02.15.24
Tech
:
Tech
02.14.24
Tech
02.14.24
Tech
02.13.24
ADVERTISEMENT
:
:
:
ABOUT
PARTNER
CAREERS
CODE OF ETHICS
ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT