,(((,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQIHUHQFHRQ,QIRUPDWLRQ&RPPXQLFDWLRQ,QVWUXPHQWDWLRQDQG&RQWURO ,&,&,&ದ 

3DSHU,G

Optimal design of Fuzzy Logic Controller for

Automatic Voltage Regulator
Tripti Gupta, D. K. Sambariya
Department of Electrical Engineering
Rajasthan Technical University
Kota, 324010, INDIA
Email: triptig92@gmail.com, dsambariya_2003@yahoo.com

Abstract—In this research, the application of Fuzzy Logic
Controller (FLC) based Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR)
system is presented. The AVR is a device to control the reactive
power and hold the terminal voltage of the synchronous generator
at safer limits. In this paper FLC based, AVR system is analyzed
with Triangular membership functions (MF). Two inputs, error
voltage and change in error voltage are considered as inputs of the
FLC. In this study, triangular MF is considered and checked the
performance of fuzzy AVR system with different proportional
integral derivative (PID) controllers in literature. It is found that
the proposed FLC based AVR system reflects better performance
in comparison to PID controller based AVR system.
Keywords—Linearized model of AVR power system, PID
controller, Fuzzy logic controller (FLC), Fuzzy sets and membership
functions.
I. INTRODUCTION
For high-quality customer service, the tasks of power
stations are to hold voltage within an acceptable range [1]. In
industrial plants, electrical loads vary time to time according to
our requirements. Therefore, allowable range of nominal
voltage in an electric power grid is very important [2]. To
overcome this problem AVR is constructed.
The AVR is a circuitry that holds the terminal voltage of
synchronous generators at safer limits. AVR is used wherever a
voltage level is not stable and fluctuations is more on the system
loads [3]. The AVR system provides the control action to the
exciter voltage for maintaining the generator terminal [4].
Several control techniques have been developed to produce an
efficient response of the generator.
The optimized parameters of PID controller play a vital role
to fulfill certain conditions in the AVR system [4]. Tuning of
PID parameters is required due to its wide applications in
industries such as aerospace applications, regulating servo
applications [5]. Recently, some intelligent techniques have
been applied to design PID controller like that neural network,
fuzzy controller and Genetic Algorithm.[6]. Therefore, PID
controller is employed with AVR system and improves the
system response of the generator output voltage [6].
The major challenges in the power system are due to the
nonlinearities, uncertainties, interaction between the control
loops and the types of disturbances because of the complexity
in the system [7]. To overcome these nonlinearities,
uncertainties and disturbance problems, the intelligent
techniques have been developed in the AVR system, such as
Fuzzy Logic Controlling, Fuzzy-PID controller, Neuro-fuzzy
controller, adaptive controller, robust controlling, and optimal
controllers. The dynamic responses of the power system with
these controllers are compared and analyzed in [8].
Sahu et al., 2012 [9] have presented Pattern Search
Algorithm (PSA) based PID controller design for tuning the
parameters in an AVR system. The Gravitational Search
Algorithm (GSA) is a meta-heuristic optimization technique
which is used for determining the PID parameters to observe
the system response [10]. Mon, 2009 [11], has described the
fuzzy logic PID control techniques for the AVR system by
using hardware implementation. Visioli, 2001 [12], explained
the fuzzy logic based different methods (such as fuzzy gain
scheduling, incremental fuzzy expert) for tuning PID
parameters.
In this work, FLC based intelligent technique is designed
with the AVR system which is related to fuzzy set theory [13].
The FLC theory is introduced by Prof. Lotfi Zadeh in 1965 [14].
This controller is the nonlinear in the nature. The application of
FLC with the AVR system is implemented to get smooth
operation in terms of terminal voltage of the generator. The
FLC with triangular MF gives better performance as in
comparison to PID controllers in literature such as PSO-PID
[15, 16], GSA-PID [17], PSA-PID [9], MOL (ITAE) [18] and
NSGA-II [19] controllers.
The linearized model of AVR system and PID controller is
presented in section II, The review on fuzzy logic controller,
fuzzy sets and MF are presented in section III. The comparative
simulation results and relevant discussion is presented in
section IV. The paper is concluded in section V and followed
by references.
II. LINEARIZED MODEL OF AVR SYSTEM
In this section, the linearized model of AVR system without
and with FLC is presented in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, respectively. The
AVR system is used to regulate the exciter voltage in the
generator [20]. The output voltage of the alternator is observed
by through the sensor and regulates it at desired level. The
regulating phenomenon includes the comparator with actual
,(((,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQIHUHQFHRQ,QIRUPDWLRQ&RPPXQLFDWLRQ,QVWUXPHQWDWLRQDQG&RQWURO ,&,&,&ದ 
3DSHU,G
signal and with reference signal [21, 22]. The error signal from Vt (s ) Kg
the comparator is fed to the FLC for improved performance of = (3)
the AVR system. The performance of the FLC depends on the V f (s ) 1 + τ g s
selection of the MF. The AVR system consists of four major
components and is presented in the form of transfer functions • Model of sensor: transfer function of sensor is given by
as following [23, 24]. Eq. (4). Where τ s is a time constant and K s is a gain of
sensor.

Vr (s) Ve Ka Va Ke Vf Kg Vt (s)
Σ V s (s ) Ks
1+τ a s 1+τ es 1+τ g s = (4)
Vt (s ) 1 + τ s s
Vs
The parameters of the Exciter, Amplifier, Sensor and the
Generator are enlisted in Table I.
Ks
TABLE I. VALUES OF PARAMETERS
1+τ ss
Model Gain Time constants
Fig. 1. Model of AVR without controller
Amplifier K a = 10.0 τ a = 0 .1
Exciter K e = 1 .0 τ e = 0.4
Vr (s) Ve Vp Ka V a Ke V f Kg Vt (s)
Generator K g = 1. 0 τ g = 1.0
Σ 1+τ a s 1+τ es 1+τ g s
Sensor K s = 1 .0 τ s = 0.01
Vs A. PID Controller
The PID controller is the foremost controller which is used
in the plant [19]. It is a simpler and easily understood controller
with better dynamic performance [18]. It is a combination of
three controllers presented by proportional (P) controller,
Ks integral (I) controller and derivative (D) controller. The block
1+τ s s diagram of PID controller is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2. AVR system with fuzzy logic controller

• Model of Amplifier: The mathematical equation of

amplifier is define by gain K a and time constant τ a as
follows in Eq. (1)

V a (s ) Ka
= (1)
V p (s ) 1 + τ a s

• Model of Exciter: The mathematical equation of exciter

is given by gain and time constants K e and τ e
Fig. 3. Basic block diagram of PID Controller
respectively shown in Eq. (2)
The P-controller decrease the rise time but never reduces the
steady-state error [25]. If the value of proportional gain is high
V f (s ) Ke the system moves to the unstable region however small value
= (2)
V a (s ) 1+τ es of proportional gain produces a large input errors with small
output response [18]. The I-controller removes the steady-state
• Model of Generator: The gain and time constant of error with worse transient response [19]. The D-controller
generator are indicated by K g and τ g respectively. improves the stability and decreases the overshoot with
improving the transient response [18]. The transfer function of
Mathematical equation of transfer function of generator PID controller in s-domain is as shown in Eq. 5.
followed by Eq. (3)
,(((,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQIHUHQFHRQ,QIRUPDWLRQ&RPPXQLFDWLRQ,QVWUXPHQWDWLRQDQG&RQWURO ,&,&,&ದ 
3DSHU,G
Ki
TFPID = K p + + Kd s (5)
s

The time domain output of PID controller may be

represented by following Eq. 6.

de(τ )
t

u (t ) = K p e(t ) + K i e(τ )dτ + K d

³ (6)
0
dτ

() ()
where u t and e t both are indicated by control signal
and error signal, respectively.
Fig. 4. Structure of fuzzy logic controller
III. FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER
The FLC is based on fuzzy set theory, introduced by Zadeh A. Design of FLC
in 1965 [26]. FLC works with linguistic variables rather than Number of inputs of FLC are two: first is error and second
numerical variables [21]. Linguistic variables have values in is change in error or integral of error. In this work, error and
terms of natural languages such as “Low” and “High” and change in error inputs of Mamdani type FLC are used. Design
denoted by fuzzy sets [27, 28]. FLC based controllers precisely of FLC is shown in Fig. 5. Interface block of FLC also shown
control the AVR power system. There are three types of FLC in Fig. 6. The values of K1, K2, K3 are 0.1, 0.1, 0.9992,
namely Mamdani, Sugeno and Tsukamoto. Mamdani method respectively [39, 40].
proposed by Ebrahim Mamdani and Sugeno method introduced
in 1975 and 1985, respectively [14]. In this work Mamdani
1
fuzzy interface method is considered, which is most widely
s
used implication method [29, 30]. Fuzzy rules in this method du
are as follows: dt
If X is A and Y is B then Z is C (7)
where X and Y the two inputs of fuzzy logic controller and Fig. 5. Design of FLC
Z represents the output. The A, and B are the fuzzy sets known
as antecedents part of the rule and C is the crisp set known as
consequent [31]. The FLC structure is shown in Fig. 4 [32, 33].
To describes the process of FLC five steps are considered
[34].
• Fuzzification method: In this method, first measures the
input variable values and change input data values into
linguistic variables [27, 35].
• Data base: It is the part of the knowledge base. It
provides the required information for the linguistic Fig. 6. Interface block of FLC
variables to develop the fuzzy control rules [27, 36].
• Rule base: It provides the specific control rules in terms B. Fuzzy Sets and Membership Functions
of linguistic variables to achieve control goals [21, 37].
The concept of fuzzy sets is related to the crisp sets (0 or 1).
It is also a part of Knowledge base.
The crisp set is considered as a limited number of MF.
• Interference mechanism: Interference engine is a main Therefore, crisp set is categorized as a subset of fuzzy sets.
part of the FLC because of it provides a decision making The MF plays an important role in fuzzy sets and it is the
capabilities based on the fuzzy concept and interference characteristic representation of fuzzy sets [38]. A MF represents
rules in fuzzy logic [27]. in the form of curve that describes the input-output fuzzy
• Defuzzification method: In this process, range of output variables in a specific region are mapped to a degree of MF μ
variables are decided by scale mapping and these in the range of 0 and 1 [31].
linguistic output variables are converted into the
numerical values [38]. The MF have different types of shapes namely: Triangular,
Trapezoidal, Gaussian, Two-sided Gaussian, Generalized bell,
Sigmoid-right, Sigmoid-left, Difference-sigmoid, Product-
,(((,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQIHUHQFHRQ,QIRUPDWLRQ&RPPXQLFDWLRQ,QVWUXPHQWDWLRQDQG&RQWURO ,&,&,&ದ 
3DSHU,G
sigmoid, Polynomial-Z, Polynomial-Pi, and Polynomial-S [31]. TABLE II. FUZZY RULE TABLE FOR ERROR AND CHANGE IN ERROR
These are total twelve MF. de(t) HN LN Z LP HP
e(t)
In this presented work, analyses of the AVR system HN HN HN LN LN Z
response with triangular MF, which is given in the Fuzzy Logic LN HN LN LN Z LP
Toolbox in the MATLAB Simulink software [41]. The range of Z LN LN Z LP LP
triangular MF which is used in this work is in the range of [-2, LP LN Z LP LP HP
2]. Triangular MF for error, change in error and output is shown HP Z LP LP HP HP
in Fig. 7.
The FLC is the two input and one output controller and values
of these input-output variables are divided into the linguistic
variables such as (HN, LN, Z, LP, HP) means high negative,
low negative, zero, low positive, high positive [27, 42]. The 1.5

fuzzy rule table for 25 rules is shown in Table II. The Surface 1

view for 5 × 5 fuzzy rule matrix also shown in Fig. 8. 0.5

output1
0
HN LN Z LP HP
1 -0.5

-1
0.8
-1.5
Degree of membership

2
0.6
1 2

0 1
0
0.4 -1
-1
-2 -2
de e
0.2

Fig. 8. Surface view for fuzzy rule base

0

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

error,change in error and output
Fig. 7. Triangular MF for error, change in error and output
Here we show only some rules for 5 × 5 fuzzy rule matrix
below:
• If (e is HN) and (de is HN) then (output1 is HN) (1)
• If (e is HN) and (de is LN) then (output1 is HN) (1)
• If (e is HN) and (de is Z) then (output1 is LN) (1)
• If (e is HN) and (de is LP) then (output1 is LN) (1)
• If (e is HN) and (de is HP) then (output1 is Z) (1)
• If (e is LN) and (de is HN) then (output1 is HN) (1)
• If (e is LN) and (de is LN) then (output1 is LN) (1)
IV. SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
In this section, check the performance of fuzzy AVR system
with six different optimized PID controllers. The value of
parameters of AVR system which have been considered in this
paper are presented in Table I. The parameters of PID
controllers are shown in Table III. The simulation results of the
AVR system with proposed FLC and that of with the PID
controllers in literature are observed and compared. The step
response information in terms of settling time and peak
amplitudes are recorded as in Table IV. It is amazing that the
overshoot is not present in the system response with proposed
fuzzy logic based controller. Similarly, the observed settling
time with proposed controller is relatively lesser as compared
to the response of system with PID controllers in literature.
TABLE III. PARAMETERS OF PID CONTROLLER

• If (e is LN) and (de is Z) then (output1 is LN) (1) S.

Author/Year Algorithm Kp Ki Kd
No.
• If (e is LN) and (de is LP) then (output1 is Z) (1) 1. Proposed FLC - - -
Yegireddy/2015
• If (e is LN) and (de is HP) then (output1 is LP) (1) 2. NSGA-II 0.7769 0.7984 0.3615
[19]
Aberbour/2015
• If (e is Z) and (de is HN) then (output1 is LN) (1) 3. PSO 0.6835 0.6322 0.2722
[15]
4. Kumar/2015 [10] GSA 0.60539 0.41477 0.20070
• If (e is Z) and (de is LN) then (output1 is LN) (1) 5. Sahu/2012 [9] PSA 1.2771 0.8471 0.4775
6. Panda/2012 [18] MOL 0.5857 0.4189 0.1772
• If (e is Z) and (de is Z) then (output1 is Z) (1)
Rahimian/2011
7. PSO 0.6770 0.5189 0.2287
• If (e is Z) and (de is LP) then (output1 is LP) (1) [16]
,(((,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQIHUHQFHRQ,QIRUPDWLRQ&RPPXQLFDWLRQ,QVWUXPHQWDWLRQDQG&RQWURO ,&,&,&ದ 
3DSHU,G
GSA-PID controller [10], PSA-PID controller [9],
MOL(ITAE)-PID controller [18], PSO-PID controller [16]
TABLE IV. SIMULATION RESULTS COMPARISON BETWEEN FUZZY have settling time 4.966, 6.1, 5.697, 5.328, 5, respectively as
CONTROLLER AND PID CONTROLLERS shown in Table IV.
Settling Peak The peak amplitude of AVR system with proposed FLC is
S. No. Author/Year Algorithm
Time (sec.) amplitude better because it does not produce peak amplitude. However,
1. Proposed FLC 4 -
2. Yegireddy/2015 [19] NSGA-II 4.402 1.236
NSGA-II based PID controller [19], PSO-PID controller [15],
3. Aberbour/2015 [15] PSO 4.966 1.209 GSA-PID controller [10], PSA-PID controller [9],
4. Kumar/2015 [10] GSA 6.1 1.149 MOL(ITAE)-PID controller [9], PSO-PID controller [16] have
5. Sahu/2012 [9] PSA 5.697 1.139 peak amplitudes 1.236, 1.209, 1.149, 1.139, 1.158, 1.168
6. Panda/2012 [18] MOL 5.328 1.158 respectively as presented in Table IV.
7. Rahimian/2011 [16] PSO 5 1.168
According to above discussions, it is clear that fuzzy AVR
system gives better performance.
Step response
1.4
V. CONCLUSION
1.2
In the presented work, simulate the AVR system with FLC
1 and compare with conventional PID controllers such as NSGA-
II, PSO-PID, PSA-PID, GSA-PID, MOL (ITAE). In the
0.8 presented work, proposed FLC based AVR system generate the
Amplitude

uniformly stable operation in comparison to others and also

0.6
peak is completely reduced.
0.4 Proposed Fuzzy Controller
In this analysis, five linguistic variables are used with 25
NSGA-II: Yegireddy, 2015
PSO: Aberbour, 2015 fuzzy rules. The simulation results show that the FLC is much
0.2
GSA: Kumar, 2015 better than PID controller and improve the transient response of
0 the system.

-0.2
0 2 4 6 8 10 REFERENCES
Time
[1] H. Yoshida, K. Kawata, Y. Fukuyama, S. Takayama, and Y. Nakanishi,
"A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control
Fig. 9. Step response comparison between proposed controller, NSGA-II considering voltage security assessment," in 2001 IEEE Power
[19], PSO [15], GSA based PID controllers Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat.
No.01CH37194), 2001, p. 498 vol.2.
Step response [2] H. Shayeghi and J. Dadashpour, "Anarchic Society Optimization Based
1.2 PID Control of an Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) System,"
Electrical and Electronic Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 199-207, 2012.
1 [3] J. F. Nirmal and D. J. Auxillia, "Adaptive PSO based tuning of PID
controller for an Automatic Voltage Regulator system," in 2013
0.8 International Conference on Circuits, Power and Computing
Technologies (ICCPCT), 2013, pp. 661-666.
[4] H. M. Hasanien, "Design Optimization of PID Controller in Automatic
Amplitude

0.6
Voltage Regulator System Using Taguchi Combined Genetic Algorithm
Method," IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 7, pp. 825-831, 2013.
0.4
[5] S. B. Prusty, S. Padhee, U. C. Pati, and K. K. Mahapatra, "Comparative
performance analysis of various tuning methods in the design of PID
0.2
Proposed Fuzzy Controller controller," in Michael Faraday IET International Summit 2015, 2015,
PSA: Sahu, 2012 pp. 43-48.
0 MOL(ITAE): Panda, 2012 [6] N. Madinehi, K. Shaloudegi, M. Abedi, and H. A. Abyaneh, "Optimum
PSO: Rahimian, 2011 design of PID controller in AVR system using intelligent methods," in
-0.2 2011 IEEE Trondheim PowerTech, 2011, pp. 1-6.
0 2 4 6 8 10
[7] A. J. H. A. GIZI and M. W. MUSTAFA, "Fuzzy -PLC PID Simulink
Time
implemented AVR system to enhance the transient response of
synchronous generator," Manufacturing Engineering, Automatic Control
Fig. 10. Step response comparison between proposed controller, PSA, and Robotics, pp. 66-75.
MOL(ITAE), PSO based PID controllers [8] S. Chatterjee and V. Mukherjee, "PID controller for automatic voltage
regulator using teaching–learning based optimization technique,"
The settling time of the FLC based AVR system gives a International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 77, pp.
minimum settling time with value 4 sec. NSGA-II based PID 418-429, 2016.
[19] controllers produce settling time 4.402 is greater as [9] B. K. Sahu, S. Panda, P. K. Mohanty, and N. Mishra, "Robust analysis
compared to fuzzy controller. The PSO-PID controller [15], and design of PID controlled AVR system using Pattern Search
,(((,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQIHUHQFHRQ,QIRUPDWLRQ&RPPXQLFDWLRQ,QVWUXPHQWDWLRQDQG&RQWURO ,&,&,&ದ 
3DSHU,G
algorithm," in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Power
Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), 2012, pp. 1-6.
[10] A. Kumar and G. Shankar, "Priority based optimization of PID controller
for automatic voltage regulator system using gravitational search
algorithm," in 2015 International Conference on Recent Developments in
Control, Automation and Power Engineering (RDCAPE), 2015, pp. 292-
297.
[11] A. A. Mon, "Fuzzy Logic PID Control of Automatic Voltage Regulator
System," International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic,
Electronic and Communication Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 343-347, 2009.
[12] A. Visioli, "Tuning of PID controllers with fuzzy logic," IEE Proceedings
- Control Theory and Applications, vol. 148, pp. 1-8, 2001.
[13] M. G. McArdle, D. J. Morrow, P. A. J. Calvert, and O. Cadel, "A hybrid
PI and PD type fuzzy logic controller for automatic voltage regulation of
the small alternator," in 2001 Power Engineering Society Summer
Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37262), 2001, pp. 1340-
1345 vol.3.
[14] A. Darabi, S. A. Soleamani, and A. Hassannia, "Fuzzy Based Digital
Automatic Voltage Regulator of a Synchronous Generator with
Unbalanced Loads," American J. of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
vol. 1, pp. 280-286, 2008.
[15] J. Aberbour, M. Graba, and A. Kheldoun, "Effect of cost function and
PSO topology selection on the optimum design of PID parameters for the
AVR System," in 2015 4th International Conference on Electrical
Engineering (ICEE), 2015, pp. 1-5.
[16] M. Rahimian and K. Raahemifar, "Optimal PID controller design for
AVR system using particle swarm optimization algorithm," in 2011 24th
Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering(CCECE),
2011, pp. 000337-000340.
[17] A. Kumar and G. Shankar, "Priority based optimization of PID controller
for automatic voltage regulator system using gravitational search
algorithm," in Recent Developments in Control, Automation and Power
Engineering (RDCAPE), 2015 International Conference on, 2015, pp.
292-297.
[18] S. Panda, B. K. Sahu, and P. K. Mohanty, "Design and performance
analysis of PID controller for an automatic voltage regulator system using
simplified particle swarm optimization," Journal of the Franklin Institute,
vol. 349, pp. 2609-2625, 2012.
[19] Y. Narendra Kumar, S. Panda, P. Tentu, and K. Durgamalleswarao,
"Comparative analysis of PID controller for an automatic voltage
regulator system," in 2015 International Conference on Electrical,
Electronics, Signals, Communication and Optimization (EESCO), 2015,
pp. 1-6.
[20] D. K. Sambariya and D. Paliwal, "Design of PIDA Controller Using Bat
Algorithm for AVR Power System," Advances in Energy and Power, vol.
4, pp. 1-6, April, 2016 2016.
[21] A. Khalid, A. H. Shahid, K. Zeb, A. Ali, and A. Haider, "Comparative
assessment of classical and adaptive controllers for Automatic Voltage
Regulator," in 2016 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic
Systems (ICAMechS), 2016, pp. 538-543.
[22] D. K. Sambariya and D. Paliwal, "Comparative Design and Analysis of
PIDA Controller Using Kitti's and Jung-Dorf Approach for Third Order
Practical Systems," British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science,
vol. 16, pp. 1-16, May 9, 2016 2016.
[23] D. K. Sambariya and D. Paliwal, "Optimal design of PIDA controller
using Firefly algorithm for AVR power system," in International
Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA-
2016), School of Computing Science and Engineering Galgotias
University, Greater Noida, UP (INDIA) PIN-201308 2016, pp. 1-6.
[24] D. K. Sambariya and D. Paliwal, "Optimal design of PIDA controller
using harmony search algorithm for AVR power system," in 6th IEEE
International Conference on Power Systems, (ICPS-2016), IIT Delhi,
2016, pp. 1-6.
[25] L. dos Santos Coelho, "Tuning of PID controller for an automatic
regulator voltage system using chaotic optimization approach," Chaos,
Solitons & Fractals, vol. 39, pp. 1504-1514, 2009.
[26] S. Priyambada, B. K. Sahu, and P. K. Mohanty, "Fuzzy-PID controller
optimized TLBO approach on automatic voltage regulator," in 2015
International Conference on Energy, Power and Environment: Towards
Sustainable Growth (ICEPE), 2015, pp. 1-6.
[27] N. Farouk and T. Bingqi, "Application of self-tuning fuzzy PID controller
on the AVR system," in 2012 IEEE International Conference on
Mechatronics and Automation, 2012, pp. 2510-2514.
[28] D. K. Sambariya and R. Prasad, "Power System Stabilizer Design for
Single Machine Infinite Bus System with different Membership Functions
for Fuzzy Logic Controller," in International Conference on Advances in
Technology and Engineering, ICATE-2012 [IEEE-Conference] at
Mukesh Patel School of Technology Management & Engineering, Behind
Homeopathy College, Bhakti Vedant Swami Marg, JVPD Scheme, Vile
Parle West, Mumbai, Maharashtra., 2013, pp. 151-162.
[29] D. K. Sambariya and R. Gupta, "Fuzzy Logic Based Power System
Stabilizer for Multi-machine System," in Thirteenth, National Power
Systems Conference (NPSC-2004) 2004, pp. 257-261.
[30] D. K. Sambariya and R. Prasad, "Fuzzy PSS for Single Machine Infinite
Bus Power System," in International Conference on Power Electronics
and Energy Systems (PEES-2012), ISBN : 978-81-920249-8-1;
Department of Electrical Engineering, Chitkara University, 2012, pp. 23-
27.
[31] B. K. Bose, Modern Power Electronics and AC Drives: Prentice Hall
PTR, 2002.
[32] D. K. Sambariya and R. Gupta, "Fuzzy Applications in a Multi-Machine
Power System Stabilizer," Journal of Electrical Engineering &
Technology, vol. 5, pp. 503-510, 2010.
[33] D. K. Sambariya, R. Gupta, and A. K. Sharma, "Fuzzy Applications to
Single Machine Power System Stabilizers," Journal of Theoretical and
Applied Information Technology, vol. 5, pp. 317-324, 2009.
[34] M. O. Singh, S. Agarwal, S. Singh, and Z. Khan, "Automatic Voltage
Control For Power System Stability Using Pid And Fuzzy Logic
Controller," International Journal of Engineering Research &
Technology, vol. 2, pp. 193-198, 2013.
[35] R. Gupta, D. K. Sambariya, and R. Gunjan, "Fuzzy Logic based Robust
Power System Stabilizer for Multi-Machine Power System," in IEEE
International Conference on Industrial Technology, ICIT 2006., 2006, pp.
1037-1042.
[36] D. K. Sambariya and R. Gupta, "Fuzzy Logic Based Power Systems
Stabilizer for Kota Thermal Power Station," in International Conference
on Computers, Controls and Communication (INCON-CCC-2004), 2004,
pp. 307-316.
[37] D. K. Sambariya, R. Gupta, and A. K. Sharma, "Simulation of Fuzzy
Logic Power System Stabilizer," in IEE Sponsored National Conference
on Power Engineering Practices & Energy Management, (PEPEM 2005)
2005, pp. 32-35.
[38] D. K. Sambariya and R. Prasad, "Selection of Membership Functions
Based on Fuzzy Rules to Design an Efficient Power System Stabilizer,"
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1-16, 2016.
[39] D. K. Sambariya, R. Gupta, and R. Prasad, "Design of optimal input–
output scaling factors based fuzzy PSS using bat algorithm," Engineering
Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 19, pp. 991-1002,
June 2016 2016.
[40] D. K. Sambariya and R. Prasad, "Optimal Tuning of Fuzzy Logic Power
System Stabilizer Using Harmony Search Algorithm," International
Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 17, pp. 457-470, 2015.
[41] D. K. Sambariya and R. Prasad, "Selection of Membership Functions
Based on Fuzzy Rules to Design an Efficient Power System Stabilizer,"
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 19, pp. 813–828, June 2017
2016.
[42] D. K. Sambariya and R. Prasad, "A Novel Fuzzy Rule Matrix Design for
Fuzzy Logic-based Power System Stabilizer," Electric Power
Components and Systems, pp. 0-0, 2016.