Professional Documents
Culture Documents
c
a
H+ Al (III) Ca2+ Mg+2 NH4+ Na+ K+
2-
HCO3- Org- SO4 NO3- Cl-
d b
Equivalents liter-1
Natural water charge balance for an alkaline system (Alk = a-b) and
an acid system (Alk = a-b = d-c).
2.3 meq Ca(HCO3)2 1.2 meq CaSO4 0.8 meq MgSO4 0.3
0.4 CO2
Carbonate hardness Non-carb. hardness NCH NaCl
After treatment with lime Ca(OH)2 and intermediate reaction to remove carbonate hardness:
(chemical equations 1, 2, & 3)
1.25 0 1.2 2.0 2.3
0.3
1.25 meq excess lime 2.0 meq NCH
NaCl
After treatment with lime and intermediate reaction to remove noncarbonate Mg hardness:
(chemical equations 4 & 5)
1.25 0 1.8 2.0 2.3
0.3
1.25 meq excess lime 2.0 meq NCH
NaCl
After recarbonation:
(chemical equations 6 & 7)
0 0.6 0.8 2.8 3.1
2+ +
Ca Mg Na
– 2–
HCO3 SO4 Cl–
1.E+00
1.E-01
1.E-02
1.E-03
D1 - [HCO3–]
1.E-04
D0, D1, D2
D0 - [H2CO3*]
1.E-05
D2 - [CO32–]
1.E-06
1.E-07
1.E-08
1.E-09
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
Summary of chemical dosage calculations required for lime & lime-soda ash softening*
Na2CO3 =
{ calcium
noncarbonate
hardness
{{
magnesium
+ noncarbonate
hardness
{
Carbon dioxide for pH adjustment after softening:
estimated hydroxide estimated residual
CO2, first stage =
{ {{
excess lime
alkalinity of softened = dose
water
{{
+ magnesium hardness
of softened water
{
source
CO2, second stage =
{ estimated hydroxide
{{
source water
alkalinity of softened = alkalinity
water
soda ash
+ dose
{{
- water total
hardness
{{ {
+
{ estimated residual
hardness of softened
water
{
* All quantities are expressed as mg/L as CaCO3
Adapted from Culp, G.L., and R.L. Culp. New Concepts in Water Purification. New
York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. 1974
GAC Tank Full open cover
with porthole
Bolt ring
}
Influent
Backwash
Surface wash
Wash
water Carbon charge
25 mm
2 to 3 m
sampling taps
Neva clog
screen
Source: MMR, undated. Extraction, treatment and reinjection. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, Installation
Restoration Program, Massachusetts Military Reservation. http://www.mmr.org/community/guide/extraction.htm. Accessed
March 7, 2004.
GAC Breakthrough
δ
δ
δ <δ
Ci C2 Cb
Cl
Effluent Solute Concentration
Exhaustion
Py
Cb
Vb Vx
Volume of Water Treated, V
igure yb MIT C
F .O
W
Source: Metcalf & Eddy Inc.
Wastewater Engineering: Treatment,
Disposal, Reuse. McGraw-Hill, New
York, 1979.
1.40
Fe(OH)2+
1.00
Fe3+ Water Oxidized
FeOH2+
0.50
EH, v
Fe(OH)3(s)
Fe2+
0.00
FeCO3(s)
-0.50
Water Reduced
-1.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
Forms of Iron in Water as Function of Redox Potential Versus pH Constructed with Total Iron Activity 10-7M
or 5.6 µg/L, 96 mg/L SO42-, CO2 Species at 1000 mg/L HCO3-, Temperature at 25oC, and Pressure of 1 atm.
MnO4 -
+1.2
Wate
rO xidiz
+0.8 ed
MnO
2 (s)
+0.4 Mn2+
Mn2O3(s)
EH, v
0
Mn3O4(s)
Wate
-0.4 rR educ
ed
-1.6 Mn(s)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH