Ethical Dilemmas Activity Guidelines

Introduction (0:00 - 0:30)

- Start with a brief introduction to the importance of ethical decision-making in IT, Nursing,
Criminology, Physical Therapy, Public Administration, and Education
- Introduce the purpose of the video: to provide guidelines for conducting an ethical dilemmas
activity.
- Mention the target audience and the relevance of the activity to their professional development.
Explanation of Activity (0:30 - 1:00)
- Explain the format of the ethical dilemmas activity, emphasizing its interactive and
participatory nature.
- Outline the objectives of the activity, such as enhancing critical thinking skills, promoting
ethical reasoning, and fostering empathy.
Case Studies Overview (1:00 - 1:30)
- Provide a quick overview of the case studies used in the activity, highlighting the ethical
dilemmas they present.
- Emphasize that the scenarios mirror real-life situations encountered in IT, Nursing,
Criminology, Physical Therapy, Public Administration, and Education practice.
Activity Implementation (1:30 - 2:30)
- Demonstrate how the activity can be implemented, showcasing participants engaging in group
discussions, analyzing case studies, and exploring potential solutions.
- Highlight the importance of active participation, respectful dialogue, and critical reflection
throughout the activity.
Reflection and Conclusion (2:30 - 3:00)
- Encourage viewers to reflect on their experiences during the activity.
- Prompt them to consider what they've learned, any insights gained, and how they can apply
these lessons to their professional practice.
- Conclude with a final thought or takeaway message that reinforces the importance of ethical
decision-making.
Closing (3:00 - 3:30)
- Thank viewers for watching and participating in the ethical dilemmas activity.
- Encourage them to continue exploring ethical issues and seeking opportunities for learning and
growth in their respective fields.
- Provide any additional resources or references for further study on ethical decision-making.
End Credits (3:30 - 4:00)
- Include credits for any individuals or organizations involved in the creation of the video.
- Display relevant contact information or links for viewers to learn more about the ethical
dilemmas activity or related initiatives.
- Consider adding a call-to-action encouraging viewers to like, share, and subscribe for more
content on professional development and ethics.
 Rubrics Ethical Dilemmas Activity Guidelines
Video Rubric Introduction:
- Excellent (4): Captures attention and clearly articulates the importance of ethical decision-
making in nursing and criminology.
- Good (3): Provides a clear introduction to the topic and its relevance to the target audience.
- Fair (2): Introduces the topic but lacks depth or fails to engage the audience effectively.
- Poor (1): Introduction is unclear or does not effectively convey the purpose of the video.
Explanation of Activity:
- Excellent (4): Provides a comprehensive explanation of the ethical dilemmas activity, including
its format, objectives, and intended outcomes.
- Good (3): Offers a clear overview of the activity, outlining its key components and goals.
- Fair (2): Explains the activity but lacks detail or clarity in conveying its purpose and objectives.
- Poor (1): Explanation of the activity is vague or incomplete.
Case Studies Overview:
- Excellent (4): Concisely introduces the case studies used in the activity, highlighting their
relevance and ethical dilemmas.
- Good (3): Provides a clear overview of the case studies and their ethical implications.
- Fair (2): Introduces the case studies but lacks clarity or fails to effectively convey their ethical
dilemmas.
- Poor (1): Case studies overview is unclear or does not effectively convey their relevance.
Activity Implementation:
- Excellent (4): Demonstrates the activity's implementation effectively through engaging footage
of participants actively engaging in discussions and analyses.
- Good (3): Showcases the activity's implementation with clear examples of participant
engagement and interaction.
- Fair (2): Presents the activity's implementation but lacks engagement or fails to effectively
demonstrate participant involvement.
- Poor (1): Activity implementation is unclear or lacks evidence of participant engagement.
Reflection and Conclusion:
- Excellent (4): Encourages viewers to reflect on their learning experiences and reinforces the
importance of ethical decision-making in professional practice.
- Good (3): Prompts viewers to reflect on their learning and provides a clear conclusion that
summarizes key insights and takeaways.
- Fair (2): Provides a basic conclusion but lacks depth in encouraging reflection or reinforcing
key messages.
- Poor (1): Reflection and conclusion are insufficient or missing.
Closing:
- Excellent (4): Thanks viewers for their engagement and encourages further exploration of
ethical issues.
- Good (3): Expresses gratitude to viewers and provides additional resources or references for
continued learning.
- Fair (2): Closes the video but lacks a clear call-to-action or fails to express gratitude to viewers
effectively.
- Poor (1): Closing is abrupt or lacks a clear message.
Production Quality:
- Excellent (4): High-quality production values, including clear audio, smooth transitions, and
visually appealing graphics or footage.
- Good (3): Good production quality with minimal distractions and effective use of audiovisual
elements.
- Fair (2): Adequate production quality but may include minor distractions or inconsistencies.
- Poor (1): Poor production quality, including issues with audio, visuals, or overall presentation.
Engagement and Impact:
- Excellent (4): Engages viewers effectively and prompts active participation through clear
explanations, compelling examples, and interactive elements.
- Good (3): Maintains viewer interest and encourages engagement through clear communication
and relevant content.
- Fair (2): Engages viewers to some extent but may lack consistency or fail to captivate the
audience's attention throughout.
- Poor (1): Fails to engage viewers effectively, resulting in low retention and minimal impact.