Professional Documents
Culture Documents
16 January 202
DEEP-DIVE Chemicals
Time to place the right bets amid the recent slowdown
In our view, the recent slowdown in the chemicals sector does not bring to an end
India’s journey of becoming the next chemicals manufacturing hub. Although we
agree that there is imminent risk of earnings downgrades, especially for non-
contracted businesses, we highlight that these corrections should be treated as buying
India’s fluorination players to gain as opportunities. We recommend two themes a) acceleration of Europe+1 for
Europe+1 accelerates fluorination players (Navin Fluorine, and SRF); b) continuation of basic chemicals’
HF capacity on the ground a strategic import substitution (Deepak Nitrite). Navin Fluorine and SRF are our structural top
advantage picks as we believe imminent HFC production cuts in the EU and the US will have a
Basic chemicals: Import substitution to cascading benefit for India’s fluorine-based complex specialty chemicals players while
continue lifetime-low phenol spreads and upcoming capacities for bisphenol-a and other basic
chemicals make Deepak Nitrite a good BUY candidate. Within our coverage, there are
other differentiated plays such as Clean Science, Aether Industries, and Archean
Chemicals where earnings recovery could occur in 2HFY24.
Acceleration of Europe+1 for fluorination players: In our view, the imminent cut in HFC
production would mean that European (and also US) players will have to cut their HF
production given that HFC production accounts for ~65-70% of global HF consumption.
Further, HFC alternative HFO requires 50-60% lower HF. Over the last 5 years, Europe’s HFC
production has declined by almost 60%. Hence, to avoid negative operating leverage for
their HF plants, European players seem to have shifted the manufacture of HF-based
fluorospecialty chemicals to India. This is clearly visible in Navin and SRF’s Europe exports
Navin Fluorine CAGR of 26% and 46%, respectively. With an incremental opportunity size north of USD
11-12bn for fluorospecialty agrochemical technicals (including generic, about to be generic,
and patented) and >USD 25bn for recently launched key fluorospecialty APIs, we expect
more orders to come the way of India’s fluorination players.
HF capacity on the ground – strategic advantage for India’s fluorine players: India’s fluorine
players have been aggressively investing in putting up HF capacity since it is a strategic
advantage in the race for incremental orders/contracts. For instance, within months of
acquiring Tanfac, Anupam started receiving orders for HF based from various MNCs (R&D
and approvals would have taken much longer). Post the HF expansion, India’s HF capacity
would be ~20% of global HF demand and ~35-40% of China’s capacity. This should further
increase India’s fluorine players’ competitiveness compared to China. Moreover, there is
limited threat from new entrants (domestic) given that the key barrier for any player is to
SRF Ltd find customers for HF. For example, in our view, Deepak Nitrite’s entry into fluorination (by
importing HF) would be restricted to a limited number of products where it would require
lower amounts of HF or where it has existing forward integration. In our view, getting long-
term orders for complex molecules (like Navin and SRF) will require HF capacity on the
ground for uninterrupted supplies.
Basic chemicals’ import substitution to continue: Indian players like Deepak Nitrite, Deepak
Fertilisers, GNFC, etc. have focused on substituting India’s basic chemicals imports. Deepak
Nitrite has had success on the phenol imports front, while Deepak Fertilisers is likely to help
curb nitric acid imports. We expect this trend to continue with Deepak Nitrite capturing
India’s import market for bisphenol-A, MIBK, and MIBC. In our view, it could also look to
manufacture cyclohexanone. Basis these capacities, in future, Deepak could forward
integrate to manufacture several downstream products of these basic chemicals where it
would have a significant cost advantage compared to any other domestic player.
Deepak Nitrite
Differentiated players could see demand recovery in 2HFY24: Within our specialty chemicals
Krishan Parwani coverage, there are differentiated players like Clean Science, Aether industries, Archean
krishan.parwani@jmfl.com | Tel: (91 96) 62095500 chemicals, etc., who are facing demand headwinds at the moment. However, there is a
We acknowledge the support of Prashanth Kamath in possibility of these players seeing demand revive in 2HFY24. The first signs of demand
the preparation of this report
recovery in these names will act as a positive trigger for them. We also like PI which is the
JM Financial Research is also available on: Bloomberg - only name where there is earnings upgrade possibility even in such a slowdown scenario.
JMFR <GO>, Thomson Publisher & Reuters, S&P Capital
IQ, FactSet and Visible Alpha. Please see Appendix I at However, the near-term upside in the name is likely to be limited, in our view.
the end of this report for Important Disclosures and
Disclaimers and Research Analyst Certification.
Exhibit 3. There is growing proliferation of patented fluorinated products since 2016 (market size > USD 4.7bn)
AI Year of Introduction Patent Status Off Patent Year Market Size (USD mn) Innovator/Manuacturer Use Case Use Case
Bicyclopyrone 2015 Patent 300 Syngenta Insecticide Maize, Sugarcane
Kappa-Tefluthrin 2016 Patent 235 Cheminova Insecticide
Kappa-bifenthrin 2016 Patent 235 Cheminova Insecticide
Pydiflumetofen 2016 Patent 1000 Syngenta Fungicide Grain, Soybean, Corn, Rape, Peanuts
Flometoquin 2017 Patent NA Meiji Seika / Nippon Kayaku Insecticide F&V, Ornamentals, Cereals
Florpyrauxifen 2017 Patent 20 Dow Herbicide Rice, Freshwater Vegetation
Fluhexafon 2017 Patent NA Sumitimo Insecticide
Triflumezopyrim 2017 Patent NA DuPont Insecticide Cotton, Rice, Corn and Soybean
Ipfentrifluconazole 2017 Patent NA BASF Fungicide Cereals, Row Crops, Speciality Crops
Mefentrifluconazole 2017 Patent 1000 BASF Fungicide Wheat, Barley, Rice, Potato
Fluxametamide 2018 Patent NA Nissan Chemicals Insecticide Vegetables, Cotton, Soybean
Tiafenacil 2019 Patent NA Farm Hannong Herbicide Non Selective, Grapes
Benzpyrimoxan 2019 Patent NA Nihon Nohyaku Insecticide Rice
Quinofumelin 2016 Patent NA Mitsui Chemicals/ Bayer Fungicide Rice
Inpyrfluxam 2020 Patent NA Sumitomo Fungicide Rice, Soybean
Tetraniliprole 2020 Patent 300 Bayer Insecticide F&V, Rice, Potato, Broadacre crops
Fluopimomide 2020 Patent NA Sino-Agri Union Fungicide Cucumber, Potato, Rice
Flupyrimin 2020 Patent NA UPL/Meiji Seika Pharma Insecticide Rice
Pyridachlometyl 2020 Patent NA Sumitomo Fungicide Field Crop and Vegetable
Tyclopyrazoflor 2020 Patent NA Dow Insecticide
Isoflucypram 2020 Patent NA Bayer Fungicide Cereals
Broflanilide 2020 Patent 850 BASF/Mitsui Chemicals Insecticide F&V, Soybean, Cotton, Others
Spiropidion 2021 Patent 400 Syngenta Insecticide
Oxazosulfyl 2021 Patent 50 Sumitomo Insecticide Rice
Fluindapyr 2021 Patent 375 Isagro; now FMC Fungicide Maize, Soybean, Cereals, Rice
Fluoxapiprolin 2022 Patent 160 Bayer Fungicide Grapes, Potatoes and Vegetables
ipflufenoquin 2023 Patent NA Nippon Soda Fungicide Pome Fruit, Almonds
NC-653 2024 Patent 25 Nissan Chemicals Herbicide Rice
NC-656 2027 Patent 75 Nissan Chemicals Herbicide Rice
Total 4725
Source: Industry, JM Financial, Note: NA is Not Available
Exhibit 4. Market size of leading fluorine-based agrochemical technicals (generic or on the verge of becoming generics) north of USD 8bn
AI Year of Introduction Patent Status Off Patent Year Market Size (USD mn) Innovator/Manuacturer Use Case Use Case
Trifloxystrobin 2000 Off Patent 2011 640 Bayer Fungicide Soybean, Cereals
Florasulam 2000 Off Patent 2013 190 Dow Herbicide Cereals
Picoxystrobin 2001 Off Patent 2008 320 Dupont Fungicide Soybean, Cereals
Fluacrypyrim 2002 Off Patent NA 10 Nippon Soda Insecticides Pome Fruit, F&V
Fluoxastrobin 2004 Off Patent 2018 180 Bayer Fungicide Cereals, Coffee
Penoxsulam 2005 Off Patent 2017 210 Dow Herbicide Rice, Turf
Amidoflumet 2005 Off Patent 2019 10 Sumitomo Insecticides Non-Crop
Diflovidazin 2005 Off Patent 2014 10 Agro-Chemie Insecticides Non-Crop, F&V
Bistrifluron 2005 Off Patent 2016 3 Farm Hannong Insecticides F&V
Noviflumuron 2005 Off Patent NA 3 Dow Insecticides Non-Crop
Hexaflumuron 2005 Off Patent 2016 5 Dow Insecticides Cotton, F&V
Fluopicolide 2006 Off Patent NA 450 Bayer Fungicide Potato
Pyroxsulam 2007 SPC; Patented NA 425 Dow Herbicide Cereals
Tembotrione 2007 Off Patent 2019 210 Bayer Herbicide Maize
Pyrasulfotole 2007 Off Patent 2021 65 Bayer Herbicide Cereals
Flubendiamide 2007 Off Patent 2019 443 Nihon Nohyaku, Bayer Insecticides Soybean, F&V
Saflufenacil 2009 Off Patent 2021 800 BASF Herbicide Maize, Cereals
Bixafen 2010 Patent 2023 1200 Bayer Fungicide Cereals
Fluxapyroxad 2012 Patent 2024 410 BASF Fungicide Cereals, Soybean, Maize
Sedaxane 2012 Patent NA 375 Syngenta Fungicide Canola, Cereal, Grain, Soybean
Penflufen 2012 Patent 2024 150 Bayer Fungicide Potato, Cereals, Rape
Fluazaindolizine 2013 Patent 2033 NA DuPont Insecticide F&V, Turf
Penthiopyrad 2013 Patent NA 650 Mitsui Chemicals Fungicide Agricultural Crops, Turfgrass
Fluopyram 2013 Patent 2023 300 Bayer Fungicide Potato, Sugarbeet
Benzovindiflupyr 2013 Patent 2026 300 Syngenta Fungicide Soybean , Maize
Fluensulfone 2014 Patent NA 10 Adama Insecticides F&V, Potato
Flupyradifurone 2014 Patent 2027 10 Bayer Insecticides F&V, Cotton, Pome Fruit
Halauxifen-Methyl 2014 Patent NA 600 Dow Herbicide Wheat, Barley, Oats, Rye, Soybeans
Momfluorothrin 2014 Patent NA NA Sumitomo Insecticide Control of crawling and flying insects
Pyflubumide 2015 Patent 2034 10 Nihon Nohyaku Insecticides F&V, Horticultural Crops
Total 7989
Source: Industry, JM Financial, Note: NA is Not Available
Break-up of molecules that went off patent from 2015-19: Of the 27 pesticide products
that came off patent between 2015 and 2019, roughly 52% (14) of all agrochemicals
were fluorine based. This was most evident in insecticides, where 80% of all patent expiry
products were fluorine based, and in fungicides, where 50% of all pesticides expiring
between 2015 and 2019 were fluorinated products.
Exhibit 6. Fluorine-based agrochemicals began with the introduction of Trifluralin, and by 1989, the total market size of leading agrochemicals
was USD 2.4bn
AI Year of Introduction Patent Status Off Patent Year Market Size (USD mn) Innovator/Manuacturer Use Case Use Case
Trifluralin 1964 Off Patent NA 120 Gowam, Nufarm, Adama, Bayer CropScience Herbicide Cereals, Cotton
Ethalfluralin 1970 Off Patent NA 50 Gowam Herbicide Peanuts, Soybean
Oxyfluorfen 1976 Off Patent NA 150 Dow, Adama Herbicide F&V, Plantation Crops
Diflubenzuron 1975 Off Patent 1994-1995 60 UPL Insecticides Soybean, Maize
Acifluorfen 1979 Off Patent 1993 30 UPL Herbicide Soybean, Peanuts
Triflumuron 1979 Off Patent 1997 55 Bayer Insecticides Soybean, Plantations
Fomesafen 1982 Off Patent 1993-1995 180 Syngenta Herbicide Soybean, F&V
Lambda-cyhalothrin 1984 Off Patent NA 595 Syngenta, Adama, Rallis Insecticides Soybean ,Cereals
Lactofen 1984 Off Patent NA 40 Sumitomo, Bayer Herbicide Soybean
Fluroxypyr 1985 Off Patent NA 255 Dow, Adama Herbicide Cereals, Maize
Haloxyfop 1986 Off Patent 2005 155 Dow AgroSciences Herbicide Soyabean,Cotton, Soybean
Bifenthrin 1986 Off Patent NA 280 FMC, Amvac Insecticides Soybean, F&V
Teflubenzuron 1986 Off Patent NA 135 BASF Insecticides Soybean, Maize
Prodiamine 1987 Off Patent NA 30 Syngenta Herbicide Turf, Ornamentals
Triflumizole 1987 Off Patent NA 25 Nippon Soda Fungicide F&V, Pome fruit, Rice
Fluazinam 1988 Off Patent NA 125 Syngenta, Ishihara Fungicide Potato, Cereals
Chlorfluazuron 1989 Off Patent NA 35 Ishihara, Syngenta Insecticides Soybean, F&V, Plantations crops, Cotton
Flufenoxuron 1989 Off Patent NA 30 BASF Insecticides F&V, Vine, Pome Fruit, Soybean
Total 2350
Source: Industry, JM Financial
Exhibit 7. The 1990s saw introduction of blockbuster fungicides like Epoxiconazole and Fipronil
AI Year of Introduction Patent Status Off Patent Year Market Size (USD mn) Innovator/Manuacturer Use Case Use Case
Chlodinafop 1991 Off Patent NA 165 Syngenta Herbicide Cereals
Epoxiconazole 1993 Off Patent NA 490 BASF Fungicide Cereals, Soybean
Flumioxazin 1993 Off Patent NA 350 Sumitomo Herbicide Soybean
Lufenuron 1993 Off Patent NA 150 Syngenta Insecticides Soybean, Maize
Fipronil 1993 Off Patent 2008 495 BASF Insecticides Soybean, Rice
Fludioxonil 1994 Off Patent NA 280 Syngenta Fungicide Maize, Vine
Cyhalofop-Butyl 1996 Off Patent NA 165 Dow Herbicide Rice
Sulfentrazone 1996 Off Patent 2006 210 FMC Herbicide Sugarcane, Soybean
Isoxaflutole 1996 Off Patent NA 220 Bayer Herbicide Maize, Sugarcane
Carfentrazone 1997 Off Patent 2010-2011 130 FMC Herbicide Cereals
Diclosulam 1998 Off Patent NA 135 Dow Herbicide Soybean
Flufenacet* 1998 Off Patent 2009 250 Bayer Herbicide Cereals, Maize
Novaluron 1999 Off Patent NA 80 Adama Insecticides Cotton, Soybean
Indoxacarb 1999 Off Patent 2016 210 DuPont Insecticides Soybean, F&V
Total 3330
Source: Industry, JM Financial
Exhibit 9. Aromatic intermediates are the most important of the three fluorinated
intermediates and are used in multiple high-value pesticides
Intermediate Type of Active Ingredient Used in
Benthiavalicarb-isopropyl
Fungicide
Quinoxyphen
4-Fluoronitrobenzene Insecticides Pyriproxyfen
Flufenacet
Herbicides
Pyraflufen-ethyl
Metamifop
2-Fluoroaniline Herbicides Carfentrazone-ethyl
Fluthiacet-methyl
5-Bromo-1,2,3-trifluorobenzene Fungicide Fluxapyroxad
Flamprop-methyl
3-Chloro-4-fluoroaniline Herbicides
Flamprop-M-Isopropyl
Lufenuron
Hexaflumuron
2,6-Difluorobenzamide Insecticides
Novaluron
Flufenoxuron
Insecticides Fipronil
Aminobenzotrifluoride
Fungicide Fluazinam
Source: Industry, JM Financial
Exhibit 10. Several agro and pharma intermediates manufactured by CAC chemicals
Fluorinated intermediates for Indian players to target: We feel that as the global market
for these pesticides grows, there will be growing demand for intermediates. We believe
that India’s mainstream fluorine players could look to target (some of them are already
making some of these) some of the intermediates highlighted in Exhibit 12. The market
size of these pesticides not only bodes well for Indian manufacturers of these active
ingredients but also for the manufacturers of the intermediates. Trifloxystrobin, for
example, has a global market size of USD 640mn and requires 0.6kg of intermediate for
each kg produced.
Exhibit 12. We believe that India’s agrochemical players could target the following intermediates
Active Ingredient Intermediate Intermediate required per Kg of AI AI Market Size (USD mn)
Fipronil Sodium Trifluoro methane sulfinate 0.38 495
Carfentrazone 2-(5-amino-4-chloro-2- fluorophenyl)-4- (difluoromethyl)-2,4- dihydro-5-methyl-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-one 0.79 130
Picoxystrobin 2-Hydroxy-6- (trifluromethyl) Pyridine 0.10 320
Penoxsulam 2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-6- trifluro methyl benzene sulfonyl chloride 0.75 210
Fluxametamide DCAP 0.65 NA
Indoxacarb Carbonic acid, N-(chloro carbonyl)-N-[4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl]-methyl ester 0.80 210
Novaluron 2,6-Difluorobenzoyl Isocyanate; 3-chloro-4-[1,1,2-trifluoro-2- (trifluoromethoxy) ethoxy]benzenamine 0.34 80
Transfluthrin TFBA 0.23 218
Trifluoromethanesulfinyl chloride Sodium Trifluoromethane sulfinate 1.20 NA
Amisulbrom 6-FMI 0.36 NA
Quinoxyfen p-Fluoro phenol 0.46 NA
Diflubenzuron 2,6 Diflurobenzonitril 0.90 60
Sulfentrazone Freon 0.38 210
Indoxacarb TFMA 0.63 210
Trifloxystrobin HF 0.47 640
Tembotrione Trifluoro Ethanol 0.43 210
Fipronil KF 1.08 495
Trifloxystrobin (1E)-N-hydroxy-1-[2- (Trifluromethyl)phenyl]ethanimine 0.60 640
Picoxystrobin 2-Chloro -6-trifluoro Methyl Pyridine 0.48 320
Bixafen 5-Fluoro-2-nitrobenzoic acid 1.10 1200
Fluxapyroxad 3-(Difluoromethyl)-1- methyl-1-H-pyrazol-4- carbonyl chloride 0.54 410
Penflufen 5-fluoro 1,3-dimethyl pyrazole-4-carboxylic acid 1.00 150
Benzovindiflupyr 3-Difluromethyl-1H-pyrazole 4-carbonyl chlorid 0.54 300
Flupyradifurone 2,2-Difluoroethylamine 0.42 10
4-Fluoro-meta Phenoxy Benzaldehyde (FPBD) 4-Fluro Benzaldehyde 0.96 NA
Flumethrin 4-Fluro 3-Phenoxy Benzaldehyde 0.43 NA
Penthiopyrad THF 3.10 NA
Source: Industry, JM Financial
Exhibit 13. NFIL’s exports to Europe increased from USD 25.3mn in Exhibit 14. SRF’s exports to Europe increased from USD 65.8mn in
CY18 to USD 64.4mn in CY22 CY18 to USD 301.5mn in CY22
Key barrier for HF capacity addition is offtake: According to several industrial estimates,
global HF demand was around 1.1-1.3MMT in CY19. Of this, per our calculations, around
800-900KTPA is used to manufacture various HFC refrigerant gases (given global HFC
production is around 900KTPA and widely used HFCs such as HFC-32, HFC-134a, HFC-
125 require 0.7-1kg of HF). Besides this, around 200-250KTPA of HF is used for
producing ~300-350KTPA of fluoropolymers globally. Further, around 10-20KTPA of
global HF is required to produce fluoroelastomers. Hence, only ~80-100KTPA of HF is
used for fluorospecialty chemicals (i.e., including agro, pharma and other specialty
chemicals). As a result, for putting up HF capacity, internal offtake acts as a key entry
barrier.
Source: Industry, JM Financial, Note: the above break-up differs from our calculations
Putting up HF capacity in India is significantly cheaper: Arkema, last year, had announced
a capex of USD 150mn for putting up a 40KTPA HF plant in North Carolina. The Saudi
Arabian government had come out with an investment proposal to put up a 40-45 KTPA
HF plant in Saudi Arabia with an expected investment of USD 176mn. This is significantly
high (almost 3x) compared to the recent announcements by Indian players such as Navin
Fluorine (40KTPA plant at a capex of USD 55mn) and Tanfac (~15KTPA plant at a capex
of USD 12mn). This clearly indicates a huge cost advantage for India’s HF producers.
Limited threat from fluorination announcement by Deepak Nitrite: Deepak Nitrite had
announced that it was going in for fluorination to manufacture one of the fluorinated
intermediates (BTF from BTC and HF). The key rationale for this investment is that Deepak
has been supplying TFMAP (a key intermediate of Trifloxystrobin, forward integration of
BTF) since the last 7-8 years, per our understanding. Navin has also started manufacturing
this product as Bayer seems to have completely shut its own capacity. Hence, Deepak
might import HF and make BTF in-house in order to protect its supply of TFMAP. In our
view, since Deepak is already supplying one particular product, importing HF would not
hurt that much for one product. However, finding a competitive edge for other HF-based
products might be difficult for Deepak. Hence, we don’t see this as a material threat to
existing fluorination players.
Mainstream fluorination players have limited KF-based products: There are several
fluorination products that are made using KF instead of HF. When there is a nitrogen
protection in the benzene ring, KF can be used to introduce F on it to manufacture
several aromatic fluorinated intermediates such as fluoro anilines, fluoro phenols, fluoro
toluenes, etc. Since KF transportation is easier and cheaper, production of these
intermediates could be relatively easier compared to HF-based intermediates. However, KF
is a forward integration of HF. Hence, that way, mainstream fluorination players (Navin
Fluorine, SRF, GFL, Anupam through Tanfac) could still have advantage in KF chemistry as
well. But Navin and SRF have limited KF-based products while Anupam has a reasonable
number of KF-based products that it had prior to the Tanfac acquisition.
Imminent HFC production cuts in EU could have further cascading benefits for India’s
players: EU’s HFC production has declined considerably from 33,380MTPA in CY16 to
12,526MTPA in CY21. This means that EU HF producers would clearly be struggling to
find customers for HF (given HFCs consume almost 60-70% of global HF). This would
have led to lower utilisation rates for existing HF plants in Europe, resulting in negative
operating leverage. In our view, this is probably one of the reasons numerous contracts
have been flowing to Indian players (having HF capacity) from European agro majors. We
expect this Europe+1 trend to pick up pace post the imminent HFC phase-down by EU.
We could see some production shifts from the US as well given that in terms of HF
capacity India has almost 40-50% of China’s capacity. We believe China will focus on
using existing HF capacities to grow domestic demand of HFCs amid no possibility of an
increase in supply.
Exhibit 21. EU HFC production has been declining continuously since CY16
Gas Group (MT) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
HFCs 55,235 38,519 33,106 43,792 41,040 40,854 36,708 31,050 32,339 33,380 27,713 19,270 18,499 15,009 12,526
Others 2,863 2,840 2,017 2,648 2,990 3,366 3,193 2,999 3,038 2,779 2,632 2,517 2,661 2,210 2,153
Total Fluorinated Gases 58,098 41,359 35,123 46,440 44,030 44,220 39,901 34,049 35,377 36,159 30,345 21,787 21,160 17,219 14,679
Source: Industry, JM Financial
Exhibit 22. Several recently launched fluorine based APIs have a peak estimated sales of
>USD 5bn
API Innovator Expected Peak Sales (USD mn)
2022
Lenacapavir Gilead Sciences 1,080
Oteseconazole Mycovia Pharmaceuticals NA
2021
Atogepant Abb Vie 766
Piflufolastat F 18 Progenics Pharmaceuticals NA
Sotorasib Amgen 326
Umbralisib TG Therapeutics 1,000
Vericiguat Bayer AG and Merck & Co. 500
2020
Berotralstat Biocryst Pharmaceuticals 1,000
Cedazuridine Otsuka Pharma NA
Pralsetinib Blueprint Medicine 700
Selumetinib Astra Zeneca 250
Tauvid Eli Lilly NA
Source: Industry, JM Financial
Exhibit 23. Several Fluorinated APIs launched over CY16-19 have a peak estimated sales of
~USD 20bn
API Innovator Expected Peak Sales (USD mn)
2019
Alpelisib Novartis 1,900
Lemborexant Purdue Pharma 1,300
Pexidartinib Daiichi Sankyo Inc. 900
Ubrogepant Allergan 486
2018
Apalutamide University of California / Janssen 1,600
Baloxavir Marboxil Xofluza 204
Binimetinib Array Biopharma 200
Doravirine Merck & Co. 250
Fostamatinib Rigel Pharmaceuticals 350
Ivosidenib Servier 170
Talazoparib Pfizer 850
Tezacaftor Vertex Pharms Inc. 2,600
2017
Abemaciclib Eli Lilly 4,600
Delafloxacin Melinta 200
Enasidenib Celgene -
Glecaprevir Abb Vie Inc. 500
Letermovir Merck & Co. 370
Pibrentasvir Abb Vie Inc. 1,900
Voxilaprevir Gilead Science NA
2016
Rucaparib Clovis Oncology 316
Sofosbuvir Gilead Science NA
Source: Industry, JM Financial
SRF | BUY
Ref gas weakness to offer a good entry point
We agree that there is an imminent downside risk to SRF’s earnings if refrigerant gas demand Krishan Parwani
and prices do not pick up meaningfully over the next couple of months. However, we krishan.parwani@jmfl.com | Tel: (91 96) 62095500
highlight that the company’s incremental capex is being inclined towards fluorospecialty,
We acknowledge the support of Prashanth Kamath in
fluoropolymers, and HFO-1234yf post patent expiry. This should reduce HFC revenue/EBIT the preparation of this report
contribution significantly, going forward. Within fluorospecialty chemicals, SRF a) is ramping
up on strong patented fluorinated and even non-fluorinated agrochemical intermediates
(three intermediates alone could command a market size north of USD 300-400mn), b)
could look to commercialise agrochemical technicals with a market size >USD 1.5bn, and c)
could target pharma intermediates for fluorinated APIs launched 10-15 years ago. Moreover,
HFO-1234yf could provide the company a USD 2bn market opportunity to tap into where it
could make 55-60% gross margin, as per our calculation. We maintain BUY with a Jun’24 TP
of INR 3,380 (SoTP based). Recommendation and Price Target
Current Reco. BUY
Ramp-up of strong agrochemical intermediates pipeline; demonstrating the capability to Previous Reco. BUY
develop patented non-fluorine intermediates: As per our understanding, SRF is ramping Current Price Target (12M) 3,380
up supply of many agrochemical intermediates for several patented active ingredients Upside/(Downside) 54.5%
Previous Price Target 3,380
such as Cyclobutrifluram, Tetraniliprole, Pinoxaden, etc. The combined market size of
Change 0.0%
these three active ingredients is around USD 800-1,000mn. Our analysis also indicates
that the market size for intermediates is ~USD 270-300mn. For example, the Pinoxaden Key Data – SRF IN
active ingredient’s market size is ~USD 420mn and its global tonnage is around 3,400 Current Market Price INR2,175
MT, as per our calculations. To make 1kg of Pinoxaden, the key intermediate (DAODAP) Market cap (bn) INR648.5/US$7.9
required is ~0.8kg. Hence, intermediate tonnage comes out to 2,660 MT and global Free Float 46%
market size for intermediate comes out to USD 140mn. We estimate SRF to have ~15- Shares in issue (mn) 296.2
Diluted share (mn) 296.2
20% market share in this intermediate. Taking this into consideration, we believe SRF 3-mon avg daily val (mn) INR1,241.3/US$15.0
could ramp up on these intermediates. The key thing to note here is that Pinoxaden is a 52-week range 2,865/2,082
non-fluorine patented agrochemical developed by Syngenta. This is a clear indication of Sensex/Nifty 65,344/19,356
SRF’s capabilities in the non-fluorine field as well. Besides this, as per our understanding, INR/US$ 82.6
it could also launch intermediates for technicals such as Fluoxastrobin, Bicyclopyrone, etc.
Price Performance
Agrochemical technical pipeline more than USD 1.5bn: As per our understanding, SRF has % 1M 6M 12M
a pipeline of agrochemical technicals such as Flonicamid (for which it already makes an Absolute -10.0 -3.6 0.6
Relative* -13.7 -11.4 -16.3
intermediate, per our understanding; technical market size ~USD 100-150mn), Lufenuron
* To the BSE Sensex
(market size USD 150-200mn), Fluxapyroxad (technical market size of USD 490mn; for
which it makes an intermediate), Bicyclopyrone (market size of ~ USD 250-300mn), and
Sulfentrazone (market size of USD 250-300mn). In our view, launch of these active
ingredients could give SRF has a long runway for growth.
SRF could initially target intermediates for fluorinated APIs launched 10-15 years ago: To
achieve its aim of taking the pharma revenue contribution to ~25% over the next 2-3
years from ~12-15% currently, we believe SRF could initially target intermediates for APIs
such as Sitagliptin, Pantoprazole, etc. As per our understanding, the key intermediates
used for manufacturing Sitagliptin are ((2,4,5-trifluorophenyl) acetic acid; 0.462kg
required to make 1 kg of Sitagliptin), 3-(Trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8- tetrahydro [1,2,4]
triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazine hydrochloride; 0.556 kg required to make 1 kg of Sitagliptin).
Financial Summary (INR mn)
Y/E March FY22A FY23A FY24E FY25E FY26E
Net Sales 1,23,128 1,45,918 1,68,688 1,97,453 2,33,317
Sales Growth (%) 48.4 18.5 15.6 17.1 18.2 JM Financial Research is also available on:
EBITDA 31,759 35,292 42,382 49,712 59,126 Bloomberg - JMFR <GO>,
EBITDA Margin (%) 25.5 23.7 25.1 25.2 25.3
Adjusted Net Profit 18,889 21,623 24,265 27,813 33,501
Thomson Publisher & Reuters,
Diluted EPS (INR) 63.8 73.0 81.9 93.9 113.1 S&P Capital IQ, FactSet and Visible Alpha
Diluted EPS Growth (%) 57.6 14.5 12.2 14.6 20.5
ROIC (%) 19.0 18.2 18.0 18.2 19.1 Please see Appendix I at the end of this
ROE (%) 24.5 22.9 21.3 20.3 20.4
report for Important Disclosures and
P/E (x) 34.3 30.0 26.7 23.3 19.3
P/B (x) 7.6 6.3 5.2 4.3 3.6 Disclaimers and Research Analyst
EV/EBITDA (x) 21.3 19.3 16.0 13.7 11.4 Certification.
Dividend Yield (%) 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.5 3.0
Source: Company data, JM Financial. Note: Valuations as of 11/Jul/2023
Exhibit 24. We believe SRF’s active ingredients pipeline has a market size of >USD 1.5bn
Active Ingredients USD m n Innovator
Flonicamide 100-150 Ishihara
Lufenuron 150-200 Syngenta
Fluxapyroxad 490 BASF
Bicyclopyrone 250-300 Syngenta
Sulfentrazone 250-300 FMC
Total ~1,300-1450
Source: Industry, JM Financial
Exhibit 26. 0.462kg of 2,4,5-trifluorophenyl acetic acid is required to make 1kg of Sitagliptin
Exhibit 27. Manufacturer without R-22 and R-124 backward integration could make 50% gross margin in HFO-1234yf post patent expiry
Exhibit 28. Pinoxaden developed by Syngenta has a market size of USD 421mn and patent
validity till CY26
Source:agribusinessglobal.com, JM Financial
Exhibit 30. Sales expected to rise at 17% CAGR over FY23-26E Exhibit 31. EBITDA expected to see 19% CAGR over FY23-26E
Exhibit 32. PAT expected to grow at 16% CAGR over FY23-26E Exhibit 33. RoCE likely to be stable despite rising capex intensity
Valuation
Exhibit 34. Our Jun’25 TP for SRF stands at INR 3,380/share
Value (INR bn) Value (INR/share)
Jun'25 EBITDA EV/EBITDA
Segm ents
(INR bn) m ultiple (x)
Technical Textile Business 3 6 19 63
Chemicals Business 38.494 25 943 3,184
Packaging Films Business 11 6 64 217
Others 1 6 4 15
Total Business EBITDA 53 1,030 3,478
Less: Gross Debt 50 170
Add: Cash & Cash Equivalents 21 70
TP 1,001 3,380
Jun'25E consolidated EPS 99
Im plied P/E m ultiple 34
Source: JM Financial
Exhibit 35. SRF is currently trading at ~41x 1-year forward consensus P/E multiple
HF capacity expansion could help cater to new projects: Navin Fluorine is expanding its HF Recommendation and Price Target
capacity by 3x to 60,000MT (from 20,000MT currently) to cater to new projects. In our Current Reco. BUY
Previous Reco. BUY
view, this expansion will help the company provide for the incremental ~4,000MT
Current Price Target (12M) 5,495
requirement from the R-32 project, ~6,000-8,000MT requirement from 120% expansion Upside/(Downside) 23.1%
of the HFO project, ~3,000-5,000MT requirement from several announced agrochemicals Previous Price Target 5,495
intermediates, and INR 6.0bn contract and CDMO projects. Hence, Navin would have Change 0.0%
Upping the ante in CDMO business: Navin Fluorine currently has 30% of CDMO revenue
from the commercial pharma APIs. The company intends to take this proportion to 50%
over the next few years. We believe this might not be a difficult task for the company
given it has several intermediates in the pipeline for the APIs such as Finerenone (used to
treat adults with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes), Trifluperidol,
Spiperone, etc.
Exhibit 38. Sales likely to see 25% CAGR over FY23E-25E Exhibit 39. EBITDA margin likely to continue its upward trajectory…
Exhibit 40. …which, in turn, will improve PAT margin Exhibit 41. RoCE/RoE likely to improve further
Valuation
Exhibit 42. NFIL is currently trading at ~41x 1-year forward consensus P/E multiple
Source: Bloomberg
Exhibit 43. India’s net import of key chemicals and petrochemicals shows a clear downward
trend
KT FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) 1207 1291 1498 1696 1840 2035 926 402
Styrene 570 611 717 725 785 811 873 721
Methanol 1229 1592 1668 1625 1774 1976 2273 2211
Acetic Acid 657 706 784 835 872 919 914 894
Vinyl Chloride Monomer (VCM) 303 318 349 344 484 458 511 480
Phenol 212 198 242 278 284 227 122 118
Acetone 116 124 128 133 142 106 61 54
Formaldehyde -6 -7 -8 -8 -11 -12 -14 -15
Mono Ethylene Glycol (MEG) 754 930 1039 1173 929 342 636 296
Ethylene dichloride (EDC) 440 465 584 504 668 562 700 595
Total 5482 6228 7001 7305 7767 7425 7002 5756
Source: Ministry of Chemicals and Petrochemicals, JM Financial
Several Indian companies have increased capacity of key basic feedstock chemicals:
Deepak Fertilisers too is expected to require roughly 2,200MTPD (metric tonnes per day)
of ammonia by FY25-FY26, up from its current requirement of 1,600MTPD, and its
current ammonia production capacity of just 390MTPD can’t meet its current or future
requirements. In order to stem its dependence on ammonia imports, DFPC is likely to
commission ~510KTPA ammonia brownfield plant in Taloja. This new capacity will not
only help reduce logistics cost for DFPC but also help address local domestic demand for
ammonia. Deepak Fertilisers is also expected to increase its capacity for nitric acid, with its
recently inked long-term contract with Aarti Industries validating the demand for nitric
acid. While CNA (concentrated nitric acid) cannot be imported, WNA (weak nitric acid)
has a huge market in India, and to that effect, GNFC is also looking to tap domestic
demand and drive import substitution by setting up a new 50,000MTPA Nitric Acid plant.
Due to the weak demand environment, phenol and acetone prices have corrected ~14-15% Krishan Parwani
krishan.parwani@jmfl.com | Tel: (91 96) 62095500
over the last 3 months. As a result, phenol-acetone spreads have corrected around ~15-16%
during the same period and are now close to historical lows. We believe spreads could start
We acknowledge the support of Prashanth Kamath in
moving up after 2-3 months as demand recovers. This along with i) INR 20bn incremental the preparation of this report
import substitution opportunity from bisphenol-A (BPA) and cyclohexanone, ii) possibility of
forward integrating to products such as isophorone (from acetone) and 2-phenyl phenol
(from cyclohexanone), and iii) tapping export opportunities by manufacturing several
fluorinated derivatives (constrained to BTF-based ones, for the time being) augurs well for Recommendation and Price Target
Deepak Nitrite. Since we believe the earnings downgrade cycle for the phenolics division is Current Reco. BUY
nearing the end, any significant correction in the stock is a buying opportunity. We maintain Previous Reco. BUY
Current Price Target (12M) 2,660
BUY with a Jun’24 TP of INR 2,660/share.
Upside/(Downside) 33.9%
Correction in phenol and acetone prices: Benchmark phenol prices have corrected by Previous Price Target 2,660
Change NA
~15-16% over the last 3 months on account of ample supply and slow demand recovery,
as per various industry reports. Globally, ~40-45% of phenol is used to make BPA. Hence,
Key Data – DN IN
it can be said that the recovery in phenol demand has a linkage to the strengthening of Current Market Price INR1,933
BPA demand. As highlighted by several industry reports, BPA demand in Asia is expected Market cap (bn) INR271.0/US$3.3
to remain soft over the next 2-3 months. But it could recover post that, resulting in Free Float 45%
firming up of phenol demand and, in turn, prices. Benchmark acetone prices have also Shares in issue (mn) 136.4
Diluted share (mn) 136.4
seen a similar ~14-15% correction over the last 3 months owing to weak downstream 3-mon avg daily val (mn) INR1,027.7/US$12.4
demand. 52-week range 2,357/1,730
Sensex/Nifty 65,344/19,356
Phenol spreads close to lifetime low; should start moving up in next 2-3 months: Owing INR/US$ 82.6
to phenol and acetone price corrections, phenol-acetone spreads over benzene-propylene
have corrected ~15-16% and are now close to historical lows. In our view, with sluggish Price Performance
phenol demand over the next 2-3 months, spreads might not move up materially in the % 1M 6M 12M
near term. However, we believe that, with demand recovery, spreads should start moving Absolute -1.6 3.0 12.1
Relative* -5.7 -5.3 -6.7
up. This bodes well for Deepak’s phenolics division. * To the BSE Sensex
Launch of new products with a potentially large market on the anvil: Deepak Nitrite’s
wholly owned subsidiary, Deepak Chem Tech, recently signed an MoU with the Gujarat
government to invest INR 50bn over the next 4 years (click here). The company had
indicated that it will manufacture bisphenol (likely bisphenol-A, bisphenol-S) along with
several specialty chemicals catering to agro and pharma. In our view, it could also look to
manufacture cyclohexanone, which, when forward integrated, produces 2-phenyl phenol
(used in anti-bacterial formulations such as Lysol), phenolic resins, etc. With the expansion
of phenol capacity (for bisphenol), in order to cater to excess acetone, the company could
look to manufacture isophorone (forward integration of acetone using aldol
condensation). These products will be import substitutes. Besides this, given it will be
backward integrated to manufacture in-house BTF, it will also look to manufacture several
BTF-based fluorinated compounds using DCNBTF, DCBTF. These new launches will cater
to export opportunities.
Exhibit 45. Acetone (USD/MT) too has corrected roughly 16% in the
Exhibit 44. Phenol (USD/MT) pricing has corrected ~15-16% over the
last 3 months
last 3 months
Exhibit 46. Phenol-Acetone spreads over Benzene Propylene close to lifetime lows
Source: Bloomberg
Exhibit 47. At a long term average price of USD 1.2/1.4Kg, Bisphenol- Exhibit 48. At a long term average of USD 1.3-1.5/Kg,
A import substitution opportunity could be around ~INR 9-10bn Cyclohexanone import substitution opportunity could be around
~INR 8-9bn
Exhibit 51. RoE to remain north of ~20% over FY23-FY26E Exhibit 52. RoCE (pre-tax) to remain at ~28-29% in FY25E/FY26E
Valuation
Exhibit 53. Deepak is currently trading at ~23x 1-year forward consensus P/E multiple
Source: Bloomberg
APPENDIX I
Investment in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing.
Definition of ratings
Rating Meaning
Buy Total expected returns of more than 10% stocks with market capitalisation in excess of INR 200 billion and REITs* and more than 15%
for all other stocks, over the next twelve months. Total expected return includes dividend yields.
Hold Price expected to move in the range of 10% downside to 10% upside from the current market price for stocks with market
capitalisation in excess of INR 200 billion and REITs* and in the range of 10% downside to 15% upside from the current market price
for all other stocks, over the next twelve months.
Sell Price expected to move downwards by more than 10% from the current market price over the next twelve months.
* REIT refers to Real Estate Investment Trusts.
Research Analyst(s) Certification
The Research Analyst(s), with respect to each issuer and its securities covered by them in this research report, certify that:
All of the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect his or her or their personal views about all of the issuers and their securities; and
No part of his or her or their compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this research
report.
Important Disclosures
This research report has been prepared by JM Financial Institutional Securities Limited (JM Financial Institutional Securities) to provide information about the
company(ies) and sector(s), if any, covered in the report and may be distributed by it and/or its associates solely for the purpose of information of the select
recipient of this report. This report and/or any part thereof, may not be duplicated in any form and/or reproduced or redistributed without the prior written
consent of JM Financial Institutional Securities. This report has been prepared independent of the companies covered herein.
JM Financial Institutional Securities is registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) as a Research Analyst and a Stock Broker having trading
memberships of the BSE Ltd. (BSE) and National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE). No material disciplinary action has been taken by SEBI against JM Financial
Institutional Securities in the past two financial years which may impact the investment decision making of the investor. Registration granted by SEBI and
certification from the National Institute of Securities Market (NISM) in no way guarantee performance of JM Financial Institutional Securities or provide any
assurance of returns to investors.
JM Financial Institutional Securities renders stock broking services primarily to institutional investors and provides the research services to its institutional
clients/investors. JM Financial Institutional Securities and its associates are part of a multi-service, integrated investment banking, investment management,
brokerage and financing group. JM Financial Institutional Securities and/or its associates might have provided or may provide services in respect of managing
offerings of securities, corporate finance, investment banking, mergers & acquisitions, broking, financing or any other advisory services to the company(ies)
covered herein. JM Financial Institutional Securities and/or its associates might have received during the past twelve months or may receive compensation from
the company(ies) mentioned in this report for rendering any of the above services.
JM Financial Institutional Securities and/or its associates, their directors and employees may; (a) from time to time, have a long or short position in, and buy or sell
the securities of the company(ies) mentioned herein or (b) be engaged in any other transaction involving such securities and earn brokerage or other
compensation or act as a market maker in the financial instruments of the company(ies) covered under this report or (c) act as an advisor or lender/borrower to,
or may have any financial interest in, such company(ies) or (d) considering the nature of business/activities that JM Financial Institutional Securities is engaged in,
it may have potential conflict of interest at the time of publication of this report on the subject company(ies).
Neither JM Financial Institutional Securities nor its associates or the Research Analyst(s) named in this report or his/her relatives individually own one per cent or
more securities of the company(ies) covered under this report, at the relevant date as specified in the SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations, 2014.
The Research Analyst(s) principally responsible for the preparation of this research report and members of their household are prohibited from buying or selling
debt or equity securities, including but not limited to any option, right, warrant, future, long or short position issued by company(ies) covered under this report.
The Research Analyst(s) principally responsible for the preparation of this research report or their relatives (as defined under SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations,
2014); (a) do not have any financial interest in the company(ies) covered under this report or (b) did not receive any compensation from the company(ies) covered
under this report, or from any third party, in connection with this report or (c) do not have any other material conflict of interest at the time of publication of this
report. Research Analyst(s) are not serving as an officer, director or employee of the company(ies) covered under this report.
While reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this report, it does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets or
developments referred to herein, and JM Financial Institutional Securities does not warrant its accuracy or completeness. JM Financial Institutional Securities may
not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report. This
report is provided for information only and is not an investment advice and must not alone be taken as the basis for an investment decision.
The investment discussed or views expressed or recommendations/opinions given herein may not be suitable for all investors. The user assumes the entire risk of
any use made of this information. The information contained herein may be changed without notice and JM Financial Institutional Securities reserves the right to
make modifications and alterations to this statement as they may deem fit from time to time.
This report is neither an offer nor solicitation of an offer to buy and/or sell any securities mentioned herein and/or not an official confirmation of any transaction.
This report is not directed or intended for distribution to, or use by any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or
other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject JM Financial Institutional
Securities and/or its affiliated company(ies) to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. The securities described herein may or may not be
eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to a certain category of investors. Persons in whose possession this report may come, are required to inform themselves of
and to observe such restrictions.
Additional disclosure only for U.S. persons: JM Financial Institutional Securities has entered into an agreement with JM Financial Securities, Inc. ("JM Financial
Securities"), a U.S. registered broker-dealer and member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") in order to conduct certain business in the
United States in reliance on the exemption from U.S. broker-dealer registration provided by Rule 15a-6, promulgated under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"), as amended, and as interpreted by the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") (together "Rule 15a-6").
This research report is distributed in the United States by JM Financial Securities in compliance with Rule 15a-6, and as a "third party research report" for
purposes of FINRA Rule 2241. In compliance with Rule 15a-6(a)(3) this research report is distributed only to "major U.S. institutional investors" as defined in Rule
15a-6 and is not intended for use by any person or entity that is not a major U.S. institutional investor. If you have received a copy of this research report and are
not a major U.S. institutional investor, you are instructed not to read, rely on, or reproduce the contents hereof, and to destroy this research or return it to JM
Financial Institutional Securities or to JM Financial Securities.
This research report is a product of JM Financial Institutional Securities, which is the employer of the research analyst(s) solely responsible for its content. The
research analyst(s) preparing this research report is/are resident outside the United States and are not associated persons or employees of any U.S. registered
broker-dealer. Therefore, the analyst(s) are not subject to supervision by a U.S. broker-dealer, or otherwise required to satisfy the regulatory licensing
requirements of FINRA and may not be subject to the Rule 2241 restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading
securities held by a research analyst account.
Any U.S. person who is recipient of this report that wishes further information regarding, or to effect any transaction in, any of the securities discussed in this
report, must contact, and deal directly through a U.S. registered representative affiliated with a broker-dealer registered with the SEC and a member of FINRA. In
the U.S., JM Financial Institutional Securities has an affiliate, JM Financial Securities, Inc. located at Harborside Financial Center, 2500 Plaza 5, 25th Floor, Office
No. 2558, Jersey City, NJ 07311. Telephone +1 (201) 633-3610 which is registered with the SEC and is a member of FINRA and SIPC.
Additional disclosure only for U.K. persons: Neither JM Financial Institutional Securities nor any of its affiliates is authorised in the United Kingdom (U.K.) by the
Financial Conduct Authority. As a result, this report is for distribution only to persons who (i) have professional experience in matters relating to investments
falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (as amended, the "Financial Promotion Order"), (ii)
are persons falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) ("high net worth companies, unincorporated associations etc.") of the Financial Promotion Order, (iii) are outside
the United Kingdom, or (iv) are persons to whom an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of section 21 of the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000) in connection with the matters to which this report relates may otherwise lawfully be communicated or caused to be
communicated (all such persons together being referred to as "relevant persons"). This report is directed only at relevant persons and must not be acted on or
relied on by persons who are not relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which this report relates is available only to relevant persons and will
be engaged in only with relevant persons.
Additional disclosure only for Canadian persons: This report is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or a public offering of the
securities described herein in Canada or any province or territory thereof. Under no circumstances is this report to be construed as an offer to sell securities or as
a solicitation of an offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction of Canada. Any offer or sale of the securities described herein in Canada will be made only under an
exemption from the requirements to file a prospectus with the relevant Canadian securities regulators and only by a dealer properly registered under applicable
securities laws or, alternatively, pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirement in the relevant province or territory of Canada in which such offer or
sale is made. This report is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, a prospectus or an offering memorandum. No securities commission or
similar regulatory authority in Canada has reviewed or in any way passed upon these materials, the information contained herein or the merits of the securities
described herein and any representation to the contrary is an offence. If you are located in Canada, this report has been made available to you based on your
representation that you are an “accredited investor” as such term is defined in National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions and a “permitted client” as
such term is defined in National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations. Under no circumstances is the
information contained herein to be construed as investment advice in any province or territory of Canada nor should it be construed as being tailored to the
needs of the recipient. Canadian recipients are advised that JM Financial Securities, Inc., JM Financial Institutional Securities Limited, their affiliates and authorized
agents are not responsible for, nor do they accept, any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this research report or the
information contained herein.