Module 2: Lesson 1 Evaluation

Name: Alquin John Omongia Bulalang Date: December 12, 2023

Course/Major: Bachelor of Science in Information Technology

Direction. Answer the following questions and submit this sheet with your answer as part of the
course requirement.

Test I. Essay
Rubrics: Content = 3pts; Organization and Grammar – 2pts

1-5. What is the intimate relation of ethics and love?

The intimate relation between ethics and love is a profound exploration into the core
values that guide human behavior and relationships. Ethics, as a branch of philosophy,
seeks to define what is right and wrong, guiding individuals in making moral choices.
Love, on the other hand, is a complex and multifaceted emotion that binds people
together in various relationships. The synthesis of ethics and love is evident in the moral
dimensions that love inherently carries.

Love, when viewed through an ethical lens, demands a commitment to the well-being
of others. Ethical considerations in love involve respect, honesty, and compassion. The
act of loving someone implies a responsibility to treat them with dignity and kindness,
adhering to ethical principles that foster healthy, reciprocal relationships.

Furthermore, the ethical aspect of love extends beyond individual relationships to

encompass broader societal implications. Love prompts individuals to consider the
consequences of their actions on others and society as a whole. A truly ethical love is
one that recognizes the interconnectedness of humanity and endeavors to contribute
positively to the greater good.

In conclusion, the intimate relation between ethics and love lies in the ethical principles
that guide and shape the expression of love. Love becomes a force for good when it is
grounded in ethical considerations, fostering relationships that are built on mutual
respect, care, and a commitment to the well-being of others.

1
6-10. Why is suicide morally wrong?
Suicide is a complex and sensitive topic that elicits strong emotional responses. From a
moral standpoint, the act of taking one's own life is widely considered morally wrong for
several reasons.

Firstly, many ethical systems emphasize the inherent value of human life. Life is seen as a
precious gift, and intentionally ending one's own life is viewed as a violation of this
inherent value. From a religious perspective, many faith traditions hold life as sacred,
and suicide is often regarded as a sin.

Secondly, the impact of suicide on the individual's family, friends, and community
cannot be overstated. The aftermath of a suicide is marked by profound grief, guilt, and
emotional trauma experienced by those left behind. Morally, the act of suicide is
considered selfish as it neglects the ripple effect it has on the lives of others.

Additionally, society invests considerable resources in mental health care and suicide
prevention efforts, reflecting a collective acknowledgment of the moral duty to
preserve and protect human life. Suicide, therefore, is seen as a failure to engage with
available support systems and a breach of the social contract to care for one another.

In conclusion, the moral wrongness of suicide stems from the inherent value of human
life, the impact on others, and the societal commitment to safeguarding the well-being
of individuals. Approaches that prioritize mental health support, understanding, and
compassion can contribute to addressing the moral complexities surrounding suicide.

11-15. What is mental reservation?

Mental reservation is a concept in ethics that involves withholding or concealing
information mentally, while verbally expressing something different. It raises moral
questions about honesty, transparency, and the intentions behind communication.

From an ethical standpoint, mental reservation is often viewed with skepticism. Honesty
is a foundational virtue in ethical frameworks, and intentionally creating a mental space
where one withholds information contradicts the principles of transparency and

2
truthfulness. It can be seen as a breach of trust, as others may rely on the information
provided and make decisions based on incomplete or misleading data.

However, some proponents argue that mental reservation may be morally justifiable in
certain situations, such as cases where revealing the complete truth might lead to harm.
In these instances, individuals might justify mental reservation as a means of protecting
others or preventing potential negative consequences. However, the ethical
acceptability of such cases is often debated, as it challenges the principle of honesty.

In conclusion, mental reservation presents a moral dilemma, balancing the virtue of

honesty with the potential need to protect others from harm. Ethical considerations
surrounding mental reservation require a nuanced analysis of the intentions behind such
actions and the impact on trust and communication within relationships and society.

16-20. Cite the moral objections against divorce?

Divorce, despite being a common occurrence in contemporary society, faces moral

objections rooted in various ethical and religious perspectives.

One primary moral objection revolves around the sanctity of marriage. Many religious
traditions hold marriage as a sacred covenant, and divorcing is perceived as a breach
of this sacred commitment. Ethical frameworks that prioritize the stability and continuity
of relationships argue that individuals should strive to uphold the vows they took, despite
challenges that may arise.

Another moral objection stems from the potential negative impact of divorce on
children and families. Divorce often leads to emotional distress, instability, and changes
in living arrangements, affecting the well-being of all family members. From an ethical
standpoint, there is a moral responsibility to prioritize the welfare of children and to seek
alternative solutions that preserve family unity.

Moreover, societal perspectives on the value of commitment and perseverance

contribute to the moral objections against divorce. Ethical systems that prioritize

3
resilience and the long-term investment in relationships argue that individuals should
exhaust all possible avenues for reconciliation before resorting to divorce.

In conclusion, moral objections against divorce are often grounded in the sanctity of
marriage, concerns for the well-being of children, and societal values that emphasize
commitment and perseverance. Ethical discussions surrounding divorce involve a
careful balance between individual happiness and the broader implications on family
and society.

21-30. Why is contraception morally wrong?

The moral objection to contraception is rooted in diverse ethical and religious
perspectives that often view the act of preventing conception as conflicting with
fundamental principles.

One common moral objection is based on religious teachings that emphasize the
sanctity of human life and the belief that contraception interferes with the divine plan
for procreation. From this perspective, any intentional prevention of the natural process
of conception is considered a violation of religious principles and moral norms.

Additionally, some ethical frameworks highlight the importance of the natural order and
argue that interfering with the biological process of conception disrupts the balance
and harmony inherent in the creation of life. This objection suggests that human
intervention in the reproductive process is morally questionable, as it goes against the
natural course of life.

Furthermore, moral objections to contraception often stem from concerns about the
potential consequences on the sanctity of the marital bond. Some argue that
contraception can lead to a commodification of sex, separating it from its natural
purpose of procreation and potentially undermining the emotional and spiritual
dimensions of the marital relationship.

In conclusion, moral objections against contraception arise from religious teachings,

concerns about disrupting the natural order, and potential impacts on the sanctity of
marriage. Ethical discussions on contraception involve a delicate balance between

4
individual autonomy, reproductive rights, and the broader moral implications
associated with preventing the natural process of conception.

31-40. Explain and justify this definition of love: Love is unselfishness.

The definition of love as unselfishness encapsulates the essence of a love that transcends
personal desires and encompasses a genuine concern for the well-being of others. In
justifying this definition, it is essential to explore the foundational principles that underlie
unselfish love.

Unselfish love, by its very nature, places the needs and happiness of others above one's
own. It involves acts of kindness, sacrifice, and a genuine desire for the flourishing of
those who are the recipients of such love. This definition aligns with various ethical
frameworks that emphasize altruism, compassion, and the importance of
interconnectedness in human relationships. "Love is our true destiny. We do not find the
meaning of life by ourselves alone - we find it with another." -Thomas Merton. According
to 1 Corinthians 13:4-8 "Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it
is not proud. It does not dishonor other, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it
keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It
always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always preserves. Love never fails. But
where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled;
where there is knowledge, it will pass away."

Moreover, unselfish love contributes to the development of strong, meaningful

connections between individuals. When love is characterized by selflessness, it fosters
trust, mutual respect.