2/1012)

Drawg
UBT:

1) It could not explain why some complexes

metal inner orbital compler
q
ion
forms in the
I some outer orbital complex
the metal.
same
oridation state of
2

[ crns)0]
3+
- d'sp j
[t(F)ojrsp 3d

② Unable to explain why shifting of unpaired

a id to up or Hd takes place.
from
③ Can't explain
the spectral properties o

complex.
theory
Crystal
vleck.& van
Hans Bethe
the interaction between
that
is electrostatic
theory
assumes
This
the metal ion & the ligand metal
dobitats in
free
attractions. The five are
divided into
These
degeneral
-.
ion are

2-sets
1 dxg2; 65doubly degenerate
eg
2)tg cxy, dyy, dyx thiply degenerate
in
symmetrical field -
If spherically (
a

around the
chargesthe(ligands placed is

remain degenerate
metal orbitats will still
will be raised energy in
them
but all of
due to repulsions but if
 the approach is not
is
spherically
lost
symmetrical
orbital
then degeneracy a
splitting of
takes
place.
orbitats
For octahedral complexes, lying be
degenerate)orbitats
along the aris (eg, doublythen
will

tag
the
of
strongly repelled
~

more

set.
Ctriply) degenerate sets.
into two
Thus, split

MH
oo
dogenerate
t
on
rin
↑
FodisEniogercent
Baggdy' Erg

stabilisation energy
CASE
=
crystal field
there is no deference
Till a "system
between SEL & WFL. But for a "system
arises:
two possibilities
10 SFL Ko>P:-HD eq

Liteg
He
goes
to
tag thus

COSE=4X(-0.4) = -1.650 is low spin complex.

 BoCP:
-tat
For WFL eg
2)

ute to thus
*
Ezg
goes eg

CASE = 3X(-0(U) + (0.6) x1=-0.6D0

i.e. high spin complex.

I WEL SFL
EC unpained CFSE
onpaired CFSE
tg eg
e-
- w

A e-
d' 1 -

0.4 Do Eg'eg 1
-

0.4 Do

-0.84
eg
2
I -008N0
d "tcg 2
tg eg
102DO
a3Eg
3
1.2D0 3
tg eg
-

3
eg
-

Y
↓ "Egeg"4-0.6D0 2 106D0
-

tzg eg
d5
Egeg? O
Ez eg I 2A0
-

6
a6 204Do
D
Y
Egeg?
O
-onDotgeg
-

4
7 6 A
5 2 I 108Do
3-0.850tzg eg
-

d
tzgeg
6
8 6 22
2 -

102Ap
d trg eq =102Doteg eg 2

a 6 3 6 3
d 0.660 I 0.6D0
tg eg 1 Ezgeg
-

0
0.0Dotg6eg) 64 0 0.000
*
 oral
For complex: ligands are

towards the central metal atoms

moving energy
the
along non arial
positions:
than that
will be more y
It orbitals
e
orbitals

↓ Norcom
I

#
Instit
#17
degenerate orbital

B
takes
pairing
At<Paringenegy:SFLOWFL.
No

place in Casey
I
form
high completes
-

-open
geometry,
In
ligands
octahedral
a planar
if
two
compels
trans
t

the metal

alongthen
y axis are moved fromaway
complex lehagonally
~ -

is

resulting
-
-
the
on

along
are
ligands garis
O

distorted 2 when
then it result in
completely, will
-

removed
& the orbitals
square planar geometry
 will be lowered
having component
in
a have
which does not
those y
energy
I

raised in
energy.
component are

- by

-x
2
+T
dx zy2
-
41
Asp
......

Xz
dyE

Li-
daydzx
dyz dz)
in
square planar complexes, YSFL

arial direction.
approach along
At <No <Asp
When came o.s.g
metal & same
ligands
but CN is
different.
Asp = 1.3Do
 Factors
affecting
the
stabilityto complex
compounds :

central metalion:
(o.s.)
Oxidation state o
1) then
came higher
I ligands
centralation
ac

stable is compound
more
is the U.S.,

[G(m0))7 [COCK8)s]** stability

[Fe(wys) "> (reCrors(s7+ stability

2) Type I
metal: 0.5.g CD, ligands,
CN all same
then stability depends
on
Eeff Eef (**) * stability 4

Eeg: 5d>4d>3d series

27

eg (icwrs))"<[dCNrs)6] *<[OzCrrs(s]
If C1, 0.s., ligands
as
3)
came

CN* stability P.

<A,
ligands:
CN
1) Nature came
a
more stable
then SEL will form
complex.
 eg [re(N),33- > [re(wn),)**)[Cr0),33
divalent metal ions
of
5) Stability g
series is in the
st
transelion
--

order.
Ent
Mn'cre*<co*(Ni*<cn++)
order.
swing-Williams
electronegatively
greater i
-

Higher
6)

the
the
central
o
slabstely I complex.
the
.
-

is the
more
↳) chelating ligands forms
to
compared
-

complexes as

monodenlale ligands.
--

6) Multidentate cyclic ligands

a

without any steric effects forms

as
more stable compler. known
Macrocyclic effect.