Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Class 3
By Richa Sharma
Clay 81912£
Propertiesqcovalentcompoundsi nature
directional in :
1) It is
is involved
As
overlapping
2) low m.p
. & b-
P -
→ Bsz*Iz↳,
Diamond , silica
Tm
few
cases
eg ,
structure
csiozl graphite
,
the
lattices instead
are covalent
giant
discrete molecules
of
.
Sic carborundum .
i
E C- Si
- c-si
4-c l
C
c
Ei
3)
Conductivity They : are
unable conduct to
state
electricity in
any
.
it
Exception is
graphite
can conduct
,
has
free
e- so
electricity .
also
Some
polar compounds
electricity eg ¥ ,
MF
conduct
4) solubility of compounds
:
like like
dissolves .
solvents
Soluble in non-polar
covalent compas
Gilson, glucose
because of
soluble in tho .
n -
bonding .
correction
in
-10B¥
( ✗ A) ppg
0-744
on
smart
pair effect More
stable Higher
→
In +3,1 She 4,2 Sb +5,3
Te-lPb-zBe→ → more
stable lower .
81912£
⑤ moleculaereact.ws# It involves
breaking
bonda
then
substituting
&
of
.
& these
reactions
to break the bond
are slow
any + ceiscrhgctck >
.
Chaz
nature these show
⑥
:
Directional in
isomerism
& structural spun
space
as
have fired geometry .
ionisation:
⑦ Autoprotedupis self or
①
Hzo -140 → Hzot + on -
Nhi ②
NHI
-
+
NB -1MHz -
amide
to
it reaction very
a
occurs
small octant ,
the
degree of
above reaction
dissociation of
at 298K is
approximatelyequal
it
let [1.8×10-9] though .
:
but
can conduct electricity
small eetent
only to a
very
Theoriesqcovaentbonding
1) Lewis All the atoms undergo
its
formationshell -8satisfy
to
covalent bond
és in
in the valence
octet
.
2
g z , :
② Expansion of
octet/ ecpanded octet
from 3rd periods afterthat
hypeevalent_[
12
§ Fg
→
10
P•F5 →
otra
-
2 e-a
Ects
ce
pas ↳ Pclztclz
atoms
some
of combining
e- bond called
singlet linkage linked .
atoms
While the
remaining
are
bonds These
normal two e-
by
.
(→
bond is represented by a
half arrow
head donor
with
towards
the
the
pointing
acceptor .
from
Sfo
rejected for
as
But it was
VBT
③
:
bond formation
that
during
overlapping
& a
orbitals undergo
The
covalent bond is
formed .
strength
bond
of extent
will depend
upon
the of overlapping
overlapping
is
More effective the
bond
stronger
is the
formed .
orbitals involved
overlapping
in
The
unpaired
e-s
must have
the
half filled orbitals
in
ie
bond
configuration just before
formation and spin .
of
the e- should be in
opposite
orbitals
direction in the
overlapping
comparison octant
overlapping :
of of
1) Type overlapping
:
of
*
or
1) formed by
head on 1) formed by sidewise
lateral
or sideways or
or arial overlap .
overlap .
2) Overlapping zone
&
2) Tmternucleararis
does not intersect
aris
internuclear
intersect each
other . with
overlapping zone ,
rather it is parallel
in bond
results r
overlappingzone
.
to the .
°
results in a- bond .
toverlapping region
8- ¥
&#
•
* e-
bond
density
• ñ
.
6
giftedI
plane NP
bond is
stronger ③ weaker than
③ o
bond
bond than t s
.
passing through
inter
&
nuclei
containing
nuclear aris acts
the
other of
its Nodal as
nodal plane
acts
,
as
plane
erplainedin point 2
-
bond be
compounds A can
⑤
easily broken
with
only
•
breakage of bond
&hence free
conformationalisomerism rotation about
bond is not
oft
possible .
with
ecistence
along
formedbond
a o -
.
bonds do
the
shape of
the molecule not
affect
shape .
be delocalized
delocalized
can't a) Can be
⑨ It
thus shows
resonance .
are
different :
④ Comparison
between orbitals having
'
t, attraction 't
n
force of
different
'
n
;
't
octant of overlapping .
Is -1$
> 2s -2s
>
3s -
3s [eqtlentqpagf
> sp sp > up
-
Up
2p up
-
Exception : ie
rip
- ie: > IÉ
rip zip
-
É :[
if
Bo_ndngth]
CBS]
(g)
s p
-
p
p
.
s
-
s -
-
00 Ooo
overlapping
'
is
influenced by two factors .
Nuclear
Altractionforecloud
:
(e)
orbital
larger foes
-
attraction is
& hence
overlapping involving
orbital should
s - be
strong .
orbitals :
nature
ii Directional of
those orbitals
In this case
in nature
,
ertentq
P -
P > sp
> s -
both
[s
overlapping
both non-directional
directional
Li Li
f)
Li
F)
-
f-
-
zs as
Zs zp
zp zp
orbitals
* In case of hybridized
directional .
which are
s sp - s sp3 -
S
sp
-
formed
is
.
bond
1) first
& Poc orbital
is chosen conventionally
is a- bonds
further bonding
.
2)
on the
① Oz 0%-0
•
0
2s
tf
Y.pl ¥8s In
0 ☒ if
Oz ☒ It
2s
ZP
L tf
* Nz
or NIN
I
; ¥
152^1
☒ It
Nz
Be Py Pg
kid CHY molecule :
☒ F- G. S
f
.
E- s
t¥?¥
.
%wÉ☐u ¥☐q¥_→ s -
p
overlap .
Cny ☒ tf
there should
Thus on the basis of UBT
,
bond
-
i r
all 4 c- n
According to this
theory ,
hybridisation .
formationqnbmoecule
:
Liv
☒ 1€11
¥ :
Px Py Pz
NB I
s orbital e-
Hf
of
bond angle
Tm this case
ecpected
n -
N - n is 90 however actual bond
angle are
found to be appear
The above anomalies can be
107°
of hybridisation
.
the basis
ecplained on
.
-
there is no
For Png & hes
all the facts
hybridisation
as
without hybridisation
are ecplained
explanation Hybridisation p
AI + AI HE'S →
ones one P
→
¥0
¥