Professional Documents
Culture Documents
College campuses are ideal places for learning and interacting with a wide range of
cultures and nationalities. However, being an international student, and having English as a
second -language poses a tremendous challenge in many areas including the writing of
assignments (Nadal-Vicens & Beresin, 2021). In the article “Writing Gravity: International
Female Students’ Academic Writing Experiences”, Abir A. Eldaba and Janet K. Isbell (2021)
examined the academic writing experiences of three international female graduate students at a
southern U.S. university. The purpose of the research was to understand the participants’ view of
themselves as cross-cultural writers, their experiences with academic writing, and the coping
strategies that they employed for their writing tasks. Although the article revealed the need for
universities to restructure their support system for international students in the area of writing,
limitations exist in the areas of the abstract, sample size, methodology, and title of the article.
From the research (Eldaba and Isbell, 2021), international students enrolled at colleges
and universities in the U.S. face the problem of not only speaking but writing English at a
proficient level. The university at which the study was conducted provides a wide range of
services and programs to aid and support international students. However, students at the
graduate level still lack the necessary writing skills that are required in academia. The three
female graduate students were carefully chosen due to their prior enrollment in the ESL classes
and the fact that their gender corresponds with that of the researchers. Data was collected via
interviews, analysis of participants’ graded assignments, and their instructors’ feedback on their
papers. The results showed that all participants felt that they were unprepared for graduate
writing tasks although they passed the ESL class. They also concluded that their writing tasks
were “hard” and hence, doubted their ability to express themselves fully in English. In an attempt
to cope with these challenges, English writing models were sort after, peers were recruited to
review their writing pieces and feedback from their instructors was thoroughly followed. In
conjunction with these strategies, participants also sought to avoid plagiarism and to revert to the
The researchers studied an important and critical issue and one that was not new to the
literature. The study of international students’ inability to write proficiently in English must be
thoroughly considered by the relevant education stakeholders. However, Eldaba and Isbell’s
(2021) abstract was inadequately constructed. An abstract is a summary of the research process.
In this study, the abstract did not include the methodology and it give no clear, definitive results
of the findings. Furthermore, the sample size was insufficient and did not represent the reality of
international female graduate students’ enrollment. In the area of methodology, all three
participants were female, two of whom share the same nationality and were enrolled at the same
ESL-affiliated school prior to graduate studies. These realities could reveal some biases and
Additionally, the researchers indicated that the study was not to be generalized but
viewed as interpretive and context-specific” (p.1888). While I agree with this due to the sample
size, it gives occasion for a misleading title. In its syntactical structure, it is understood that the
study referred to all international female graduate students. However, the study focused on only
three students.
The Literature Review was found to be quite resourceful and provided much evidence
and support for the current issues that were affecting the participants as international students.
These were present in the areas of writing challenges and coping skills that were employed by
the participants. Unfortunately, many of the experts were found to be more than ten years from
the article’s date of publication. This implies that new data/research could have been found that
could have proven the situation futile. Moreover, the role of the authors could have also impacted
the outcome of the findings. The first author had similar experiences as an international student
while the second, due to her associations has cultivated feelings of empathy toward international
students. Although nothing is inherently wrong with the authors’ position, these already
calculated feelings and experiences can ‘force’ the findings in a particular direction. The authors
should have been completely divorced from this subject. This would avoid the potential for
On the other hand, the researchers were forthcoming in their suggestions for further
research. They claimed that the study “could include male participants and observation of
student interactions with professors or tutors” (p.1888). The inclusion of males will open the way
Overall the study found that new ways must be sought after by stakeholders of
universities to find solutions to the challenges international students face regarding their
education. Writing centers that are established to assist international students must be
academically staffed with lecturers who are cognizant of the writing tasks of international
students. Finally, there must be a dialogue between university administrators and international
students on the way forward regarding proper support in their academic writing journey.
References
Eldaba, A. A., & Isbell, J. K. (2021). Writing gravity: International female graduate students’
https://doi.org/10.29121/web/v18i2/31
Nadal-Vicens, M., & Beresin, G. (2021, January 27). International College Students: Challenges
https://www.mghclaycenter.org/parenting-concerns/young-adults/international-college-
students/