Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q.1 What do you understand by price affect how can be separated from income and
substitution effect?
Ans. Price effect : Price effect can be defined as the change in the quantity demanded of a
commudity as a result of decrease in its price. This change in demand take place through the
substitution effect and income effect. The price effect is the combination of both income and
substitution effect. The effect of the price depends on the nature of the goods. For example,
standard and Giffen (inferior) goods have positive and negative effects. However, normal goods
have zero impact. The substitution of effect it’s always negative however the income effect can
be positive or negative therefore the price effect can be positive or negative depending on the
direction and magnitude of both substitute and income effects.
Ex = Suppose ABC firm has been dealing in the chocolate business for the past 15 years. They
import premium quality cacao beans from Ecuador in South America. However, in 2022, when
the government removed certain trade restrictions on cacao beans, it reduced the price of
chocolates. In addition, this incident occurred right before Christmas. As a result, the demand for
chocolates leaped. However, if the Ecuadorian government had imposed restrictions, the price
effect would have caused a fall in demand, causing a positive impact.
Income effect : with a fall in the price of a commodity, purchasing power of the consumer
increases. he can buy the same quantity of commodity with less income spent. In the case of
normal goods, the income effect is positive as the quantity demanded of the commodity
increases with an increase in income. However, the income effect is negative for inferior goods
because consumer preferred to buy other goods as there real income rises.
Substitution effect : that is the price of a community falls, it becomes cheaper in comparison to
the other community. Therefore, consumers will buy more of the community as it is relatively
cheaper compared to the other goods that are expensive. The increase in quantity demanded
due to a change in relative price is called the substitution effect.
The overall price effect is positive for normal goods because both the income and substitution effects
are positive.
The substitution effect is negative, but the income effect is positive for inferior goods. However, the
overall price effect is still negative for inferior goods. This is because the magnitude of the negative
substitution effect is greater than the magnitude of the positive income effect.
Similar to inferior goods, the substitution effect is negative but the income effect is positive for Giffen
goods. However, the overall price effect becomes positive for Giffen goods. This happens because the
magnitude of the negative substitution effect is less than the magnitude of the positive income effect.
as the price of a commodity falls, it becomes cheaper in comparison to other commodities leading to a
substitution effect. The real income of consumers also increases leading to the income effect. Both of
these effects make up the price effect.
the decomposition of the price effect into substitution and income effects is done
using the indifference curve with the budget line of the consumer. There are two
approaches to separating the total effect into income and substitution effect namely
the Hicksian approach and the Slutsky approach.
As we know, this price effect consists of income and substitution effects. Now To make the
compensating variation in income in order to isolate the substitution effect, the consumer’s
money income is reduced by drawing the budget line JT parallel to AB 1, so that it is tangent
to the original indifference curve IC 1 at point E 3. The reason for the compensating variation
in income is to allow the consumer to remain on the same level of satisfaction as before
the price change. Thus, line JT is known as the compensated budget line.
Now the movement from point E1 to E3 on the same indifference curve (IC1) shows the
substitution effect. Here, the consumer buys more units of good X because it has become
relatively cheaper than before, and thus he substitutes expensive (Y good) for good X. the
substitution effect of a price change is always negative, real income being held
constant.
The income effect can be obtained by subtracting the substitution effect from the price effect, which will be
equal to the difference between E3 and E2 or X3 and X2. To isolate the income effect from the price
effect, return the income which was taken away from the consumer so that he goes
back to the budget line AB 1, and is again in equilibrium at point T on the curve. The
movement from point E on the lower indifference curve IC 1, to point E on the high
3 2
indifference curve IC 2 is the income effect .By the method of compensating variation
in income, the real income of the consumer has increased as a result of the fall in the
price of X. The income effect with respect to the price change for a normal good is
negative.
Conclusion
he price effect is the totality of income and substitution effect. It means that
the total price effect can be split into two components as income effect and
substitution effect. According to the Hisksian substitution effect, when the
price of any good falls (say good X) money income of the consumer is
reduced by the amount of real income increased so that real income
becomes constant implying that the consumer is neither better off nor
worse off than before.
In the case of a normal good, the substitution effect is negative as to
maintain the same level of satisfaction on the same indifference curve, a
consumer increases the quantity demand of goods X whose price has fallen,
and decreased the quantity demand for good Y as the price of X becomes
relatively cheaper than the price of Y. The income effect is positive. Thus,
the decomposition of the price effect into substitution and income effect
can be done with the help of the indifference curve and budget line.
For example, when the price of a commodity was Rs 10 per unit, the market
demand for that commodity was 50 units a day. When the price of the product
dropped to Rs 8, demand increased to 60 units. The price elasticity of demand
can here be evaluated as -
PED = %change in quantity demanded / % change in price, where
demand price elasticity is often a negative number since the quantity
requested and the product share price are inversely related. This
implies that the higher the price, the lower the demand, and the lower
the price, the greater the product demand.
We can get one of three results when comparing the expenditure. They are
the :
Request elasticity would be greater than the unity of (Ep > 1). If total
expenditure rises with a decrease in price and decreases with a rise in
price, the value of the PED is greater than 1. Here, price rises, and
overall spending or outlays shift in the opposite direction.
on the X-axis, gross outlay or cost is calculated in the graph while the
price on the Y-axis is measured. The transfer from point A to point B
demonstrates elastic demand in the figure, as we can see that overall
spending has risen with price decreases.
The elasticity of demand will be equal to unity (Ep = 1). If, in response
to a rise in the price of the commodity, the overall expenditure on the
commodity remains unchanged, the value of the PED would be equal
to 1, it is called unitary elastic.
The elasticity of demand will be less than unity (Ep < 1) . The value of
PED would be less than 1 if total spending decreases with a decline in
price and rises with a rise in price. Here, commodity prices and overall
spending are going in the same direction.
In the above figure five points L, M, N, P, and Q are taken on the given linear
demand curve. The elasticity of demand at each point can be identified with
the help of the above method. Suppose the N point is in the exact center of
the given demand curve. So, the elasticity of demand at point N is unitary. It
is because at the mid-point of the demand curve the lower segment and
upper segment of the demand curve are equal.
Thus,
ep at point N= (Lower segment of the demand curve)/ (Upper segment
of the demand curve) = DN/NC=1.
At any point to the right of the mid-point (for example point P) the
point elasticity of demand is less than unitary which means demand is
inelastic or less elastic. This is because to the right of the mid-point of
the demand curve, the lower segment is shorter than the upper
segment.
Any point left to the mid-point of the demand curve (for example at
point M) the point elasticity of demand is greater than unitary means
demand is more elastic.
At the point where the demand curve meets Y-axis (for example point
L), the point elasticity is infinity. This is because the whole length of the
demand curve will be the lower segment and the value of the upper
segment is zero.
At any point where the demand curve meets the X-axis (for example
point Q), the point elasticity is zero. This is because the whole length of
the demand curve is covered by the upper segment and the lower
segment is zero.
Where P1 and Q1 are the original price and quantity, and P2, Q2 are the new one.
The following figure and subsequent explanation show the detail regarding
the measurement of price elasticity of demand under the arc method.
In figure DD is the demand curve and based on the change in price and quantity,
ep is calculated and which has the same value from A to B or from B to A because
we take the average values while calculating the coefficient of elasticity. Thus, under
such a method, the movement from A to B or movement from B to A gives the
same value of ep.
Thus, the point method of measurement of price elasticity of demand is used in the
case when the changes in price and quantity are small but we use the arc method
to measure the elasticity of demand when the change in price and quantity is
relatively large. When the elasticity has to measure over some range or arc along a
demand curve rather than at a particular point, the point elasticity does not provide
the true and correct magnitude of price elasticity of demand.
So, we have to use the arc method to measure the price elasticity of demand when
the change in price and quantity is larger. Arc method is more suitable to use
because of its technique. In the case of the non-linear demand curve, the use of the
arc method is more suitable. We have to keep in our mind that the arc elasticity
measure takes into account the midpoint of the chord that connects the two points
on the demand curve.
Q.3 Explain the law of variable proportions with the help of diagram.
Ans. This law exhibits the short-run production functions in which one
factor varies while the others are fixed. Also, when you obtain
extra output on applying an extra unit of the input, then this
output is either equal to or less than the output that you obtain
from the previous unit. The Law of Variable Proportions concerns
itself with the way the output changes when you increase the
number of units of a variable factor. Hence, it refers to the effect
of the changing factor-ratio on the output.
In other words, the law exhibits the relationship between the units
of a variable factor and the amount of output in the short-term.
This is assuming that all other factors are constant. This
relationship is also called returns to a variable factor.
The law states that keeping other factors constant, when you
increase the variable factor, then the total product initially
increases at an increases rate, then increases at a diminishing rate,
and eventually starts declining.
Let’s say that you have 10 acres of land and 1 unit of labour for
production. Therefore, the land-labour ratio is 10:1. Now, if you
keep the land constant but increase the units of labour to 2, the
land-labour ratio becomes 5:1.Therefore, as you can see, the law
analyses the effects of a change in the factor ratio on the amount
of out and hence called the Law of Variable Proportions.
In this example, the land is the fixed factor and labour is the
variable factor. The table shows the different amounts of output
when you apply different units of labour to one acre of land which
needs fixing.
The following diagram explains the law of variable proportions. In
order to make a simple presentation, we draw a Total Physical Product
(TPP) curve and a Marginal Physical Product (MPP) curve as smooth
curves against the variable input (labour).
1. Stage III – Now, the TPP starts declining, MPP decreases and
becomes negative. Therefore, it is called the stage of negative returns.
In this example, Stage III runs between seven to eight units of labour
(from the point M onwards).
1K+2L 100 - -
6K+12L 600 - -
o Once the firm has achieved the point of optimum capacity, it operates on
Constant Returns to Scale. Here the production of a Firm reaches a point, where
the resources of the economy are utilised optimally .After the point of optimum
capacity, the economies of production are counterbalanced by the diseconomies
of production.
16K+32L 2400 - -
The main
reason behind Diminishing Returns to Scale is Diseconomies of Large
Scale. Diseconomies of Scale mean that the firm has now become so large that it has
become difficult to manage its operations. Diseconomies of Scale are of two types; viz.,
Internal Diseconomies and External Diseconomies.
Internal Diseconomies: Internal Diseconomies means the disadvantages of
the large-scale production that a firm has to suffer because of its own
operations. For example, Technological Diseconomies because of the heavy
cost of wear and tear.
External Diseconomies: External Diseconomies mean the disadvantages of
large-scale production that all the firms of the industry have to suffer when
the industry as a whole expands. For example, stiff competition, etc.
Assumptions Of The Law Of Returns To Scale
There are a few assumptions in the law of returns to scale which are stated below.
o There are only two variables used by the firm: labour and capital.
o Labour and capital are integrated with a fixed proportion.
o Prices do not fluctuate.
o The technology remains the same and does not change .
In the long run, the firm can change its old machines, equipment and plants, scale of
production, organization and management in order to expand its output. The firm’s
objective is the choice of optimal expansion path in order to minimize its costs or
maximize its profits. The expansion path is the locus of different points of firm’s
equilibrium when it changes its total outlay to expand output while relative factor prices
remain constant.
Assumptions
(i) There are two factors of production, labour and capital, which are variable.
(v) The firm increases its total outlay in order to expand its output.
Explanation
The firm is in equilibrium at point P where the isoquant 100 is tangent to its
corresponding isocost line С1L1 and similarly the other two isoquants 200
and 300 are tangent to isocost lines С2L2and C3L3 respectively at points Q
and R. Each point of tangency shows optimal combination of labour and
capital that produces an optimal output level. The line OS joining these
equilibrium points P, Q and R through the origin is the expansion path of
the firm. The firm expands its output along this line keeping factor prices as
constant.
The straight line expansion path through the origin, OS, implies a
homogeneous production function (or constant returns to scale). Such an
ex- pension path is called an isocline which is the locus of points о along
which MRTSLK = MPL/MPK = w/r. Thus OS is the optimal expansion path for
the firm in the long run.
But the choice of the expansion path depends on the ratio of factor prices.
If the ratio of factor prices increases, the isocost lines become flatter, as
shown in figure 2, and the optimal expansion path will be ОТ. If initially the
slope of the isocost lines is steep and the expansion path is OS, with the
increase in the ratio of factor prices the optimal expansion path of the firm
changes to ОТ. Both the expansion paths show homogeneous production
function.
In case the production function is non- homogeneous the optimal
expansion path will not be a straight line from the origin. Rather, it will be a
zigzag line OS, as shown in Figure 3. It is a curved isocline which is the
optimal expansion path of the firm because at the points of tangency L, M
and N, the slopes of the isocost lines (w/r) and isoquants (MRTSLK ) are
equal.
In the short run, the firm can increase only the variable factors and
not the fixed factors in order to increase its output, while relative
factor prices remain constant. Suppose capital is the fixed factor and
labour is the variable factor, other assumptions remaining the same.
The firm cannot choose the optimal expansion path OS. It can ex-
pand its output only along the line С С’, as shown in Figure 4. But this
is not the optimal expansion path because points P, S and T are not
on the isocline.
Contrarily, variable production factors are those whose amount is easily influenced by
changes in output level. For instance, we may quickly alter the labour force to boost or
lower productivity.
Production Function:-
Production Function is the relationship between physical inputs (land, labour, capital,
etc.) and physical outputs (quantity produced). In another way, a production function is
a mathematical relationship involving inputs and output that enables the maximum
output to be created with a specific set of input factors and technological capabilities.
In the words of Watson, “Production Function is the relationship between a firm’s
production (output) and the material factors of production (input).”
Qx = f (L, K)
Suppose there are two-factor inputs: labour (L) and capital (K). Qx is the quantity of
output of commodity x, f is the function, L is the unit of labour and k is the unit capital.
According to this, the amount of output depends on the labour and capital inputs
utilised in manufacturing.
Here, there are two things to think about. First, the production function must be taken
into account in relation to a specific time frame, such as a short term and a long period.
Second, the state of technology affects how well manufacturing functions. It's vital to
remember that a production function merely depicts the physical relationship and has no
financial value.
Q = AK^a L^b ( here, A is a positive constant, and a and b are positive fractions )
Average Product =
3. Marginal Product: Marginal Product refers to the addition to the total product when
one more unit of a variable factor is employed. It calculates the extra output per
additional unit of input while keeping all other inputs constant. Other names of
Marginal Product are Marginal Physical Product (MPP) or Marginal Return.
MPn = TPn – TPn-1
Here,
MPn = Marginal product of nth unit of the variable factor,
TPn = Total product of n units of the variable factor, and
TPn-1 = Total product of (n-1) units of the variable factor
Conclusion:
In this blog post, we learned that the Production Function is the actual connection
between inputs and outputs and that production is the process that a firm utilises to
transform inputs into outputs. Additionally, we studied the significance of the short run
and long run production functions. How much one input can be replaced by another
affects the three different types of production functions (Cobb Douglas production
function, Leontief production function, and CES production function). Additionally, we
examined the sustainability, complementarity, distinctiveness, and production period,
which are the four fundamental characteristics of the production function.
perfect competition is an ideal type of market structure where all producers and
consumers have full and symmetric information and no transaction costs. Under
perfect competition, there are many buyers and sellers, and prices reflect supply
and demand. Companies earn just enough profit to stay in business and no more.
If they were to earn excess profits, other companies would enter the market and
drive profits down. Perfect competition is theoretically the opposite of a
monopolistic market. The opposite of perfect competition is imperfect
competition, which exists when a market violates the abstract tenets of
neoclassical pure or perfect competition.
Features / Characteristics of Perfect Competition:-
The main features of perfect competition are as follows:
1. Many Buyers and Sellers – There will always be a huge number of buyers and
sellers in this form of marketplace. The advantage of having a large number of
small-sized producers is that they cannot combine to influence the market price.
If the quantity offered by an individual seller is very small compared to the total
market produce, they cannot influence the market price independently.
Similarly, if there are many buyers, then an individual will not have the power to
influence the price by altering demand for a product. The individual demand will
not be large enough to change the price.
2. Homogeneous Market – The product or service produced by the buyers in a
perfectly competitive market should be homogenous in all respects. There should
be no differentiation between them in terms of quantity, size, taste, etc., so that
the products are perfect substitutes for each other. If a seller tries to charge a
higher price for products that are so similar, they will lose their customers
immediately.
3. Free Entry and Exit – Another condition of a perfectly competitive market is
that no artificial restrictions prevent a firm’s entry, or compel an existing firm to
stay put when they want to leave. Their decision to enter, stay or leave the
market depends purely on economic factors.
4. Perfect Knowledge – The buyers and sellers have perfect knowledge about the
market conditions. The buyers are aware of the details of the product sold as well
as its price. At the same time, the sellers know about the potential sales of their
products at different price points. Since the buyers are already informed about
the product, there is no need for advertising or sales promotion. So firms don’t
have to invest a single penny in these activities. It also helps sellers save on
advertising or other marketing activities, which keeps the price of their products
low.
5. Transport Cost – In the perfectly competitive market, the costs for transporting
goods, services or factors of production from one place to another is either zero
or constant for all sellers. the transport cost is uniform for all of them.
6. Absence of Artificial Restrictions – There is no interference from the
government or any other regulatory body to hinder the smooth functioning of the
perfect competition. There are no controls or restrictions over the supply or
pricing and the price can change solely based on the demand and supply
conditions.
7. Uniform Price – There is a single uniform price for all products and services in
a perfectly competitive market. The forces of demand and supply determine it.
The above 3 conditions give a monopoly market the power to influence the
price of certain products. This is the true essence of a monopoly market.
Features of a Monopoly:-
Following are the main features of monopoly:-
1. Single seller and several buyers
The primary feature of a monopoly is a single seller and several buyers. Also, in
a monopoly, there is no difference between the firm and the industry. This is
because there is only one producer and/or seller. Therefore, the firm’s demand
curve is the industry’s demand curve. Since there are several buyers, an
individual buyer cannot affect the price in a monopoly market.
2. No close substitute
In a monopoly, the product that the monopolist produces has no close substitute.
If a close substitute exists, then the monopoly cannot exist.
Remember, a monopoly can only exist when the cross-elasticity of the product
that the monopolist produces is zero. Therefore, the monopolist can determine
the price of his own choice and refuse to sell below the determined price.
3. Restriction on the entry of new firms:
Even if the monopolist firm is earning super-normal profits, new firms face many
hurdles in trying to enter the industry. There are many reasons for this like legal
barriers, technology, or a naturally occurring substance which others cannot find.
Sometimes, the monopolist works in a small market making it economically
challenging for new firms to enter.
4. Price maker:
A monopolist is the price maker. A price maker is one who has got control over
the supply of the product., in case, the monopolist increase the supply of
commodity, the price of it may fall. If he reduses the supply, the price of it may
rise.
5. Price discrimination:
A monopolist maybe able to charge different prices for the same product from
different customers.
1. Reduced client welfare: Due to price discrimination, some clients pay high
prices while others pay a lower price. This can lead to some clients being
priced out of the market, which reduces client choice.
2. Increased administrative costs: Price discrimination increases the
administrative cost for the business. Activities like compiling client data
and developing price strategies might cost extra to the business. Covering
these costs is generally high in the case of small firms.
3. Reduced competition: Price discrimination reduces the competition in the
market. This allows the larger business with more resources to charge a
higher price. Large businesses keep the small competitors away by
charging a high price. This leads to less creation and less variety of choices
for the clients.
4. Potential for discrimination: Price discrimination can also lead to
discrimination based on race, gender, social, or economic status.
Ls = f(ROI)
Change in Equilibrium:-
o Change in demand-
o Change in Supply-
Criticism:-
Criticism :
(i) Fertility of soil is neither original nor destructible.
(ii) Fertile land might not be used for the cultivation first of all.
(iii) Marginal or no-rent land may exist not
(iv) Rent is not due to fertility but due to Scarcity.
(v) Rent is not included in the price of a product is also wrong.
(vi) Rent is not paid only for land.
(vii) Difficulty in measuring productivity of land before fixing rent.
(viii) Every land has some fertility.
(ix) Unrealistic assumption of perfect competition.
(x) land have many alternative uses.
(pending..)
Q. Explain the Pareto’s criteria of welfare.
Ans. This criterion refers to economic efficiency which can be objectively
measured. It is called Pareto criterion after the famous Italian economist
Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923). According to this criterion any change that
makes at least one individual better-off and no one worse-off is an
improvement in social welfare. Conversely, a change that makes no one
better-off and at least one worse-off is a decrease in social welfare.
The criterion can be stated in a somewhat different way: a situation in which it
is impossible to make anyone better-off without making someone worse-off is
said to be Pareto-optimal or Pareto efficient.
Alternative criteria for economic efficiency based on Pareto efficiency are often
used to make economic policy, as it is very difficult to make any change that
will not make any one individual worse off.
In any situation other than Pareto efficiency, some changes to the allocation of
resources in an economy can be made, such that at least one individual gains
and no individuals lose from the change. Only changes in the allocation of
resources that meet this condition are considered moves toward Pareto
efficiency. Such a change is called a Pareto improvement.
A Pareto improvement occurs when a change in allocation harms no one and
helps at least one person, given an initial allocation of goods for a set of
persons. The theory suggests that Pareto improvements will keep enhancing
the value of an economy until it achieves a Pareto equilibrium, where no more
Pareto improvements can be made. Conversely, when an economy is at Pareto
efficiency, any change to the allocation of resources will make at least one
individual worse off.
For the attainment of a Pareto-efficient situation in an economy three marginal
conditions must be satisfied:
(a) Efficiency of distribution of commodities among consumers (efficiency in
exchange)
(b) Efficiency of the allocation of factors among firms (efficiency of
production)
(c) Efficiency in the allocation of factors among commodities (efficiency in
the product-mix, or composition of output).
(a) Efficiency of distribution of commodities among consumers :
The first condition for Pareto optimality relates to efficiency in exchange. The
required condition is that “the marginal rate of substitution between any two
products must be the same for every individual who consumes both.” It means
that the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) between two consumer goods
must be equal to the ratio of their prices. Since under perfect competition
every consumer aims at maximising his utility, he will equate his MRS for two
goods, X and Y to their price ratio (Px/Py).
The box diagram Figure 1 explains the optimum condition of exchange. Take two
individuals A and В who possess two goods X and Y in fixed quantities
respectively. Oa is the origin for consumer A and Ob the origin for В.
At point E the marginal rate of substitution between the two goods is not equal to
the ratio of their prices because the two curves do not have the same slope. So E is
not the point of у optimum exchange of the two goods X and Y between the two
individuals A and B. Let us try to find out such a point where one individual
becomes better off without making the other worse off.
Suppose A would like to have more of X and В more of Y. Each will be better off
without making the other worse off if he moves to a higher indifference curve. Let
them move from point E to R. At R, A gets more of Х by sacrificing some Y, while
В gets more of Y by sacrificing some amount of X.
There is no improvement in B’s position because he is on the same indifference
curve B1 but A is much better off at R having moved to a higher indifference curve
from A1 to A3 If, however, A and В move from E to P, A is as well off as before for
he remains on the same indifference curve A1 В becomes much better off having
moved from B1 to B3.
It is only when they move from E to Q that both are on higher indifference curves.
P, Q and R are, thus, the three conceivable points of exchange, The contract curve
CC is the locus of these points of tangency which shows the various positions of
exchange that equalize the marginal rates of substitution of X and Y.
Any point on the CC curve, therefore, satisfies this optimum condition of
exchange. But a movement along the contract curve in either direction always
tends to make one individual better off at the expense of the other. Thus each point
on the contract curve represents optimum social welfare in the Paretian sense.
(b) Efficiency in Production:
To derive the marginal condition for a Pareto-optimal allocation of factors
among producers we use an argument closely analogous to the one used for
the derivation of the marginal condition for optimal distribution of
commodities among consumers. In the case of allocation of given resources K
and L we use the Edgeworth box of production shown in figure 2. Only points
on the contract curve of production are Pareto-efficient. Point H is inefficient,
since a reallocation of the given K and L between the producers of X and Y
such as to reach any point from c to d inclusive results in the increase of at
least one commodity without a reduction in the other. Them contract curve is
the locus of points of tangency of the isoquants of the two firms which
produce X and Y, that is, points where the slopes of the isoquants are equal.
Thus at each point of the contract curve the following condition holds
MRTSXLK = MRTSYLK
Therefore we may state the marginal condition for a Pareto-optimal allocation
of factors among firms as follows:
The marginal condition for a Pareto-optimal allocation of-factors (inputs)
requires that the MRTS between labour and capital be equal for all
commodities produced by different firms.
Drawbacks:-
The Pareto criterion cannot evaluate a change that makes some individuals
better- off and others worse-off. Since most government policies involve
changes that benefit some and harm others it is
obvious that the strict Pareto criterion is of limited applicability in real-
world situations. Furthermore, a Pareto-optimal situation does not guarantee
the maximization of the social welfare. For example, we know that any point
on the production possibility curve represents a Pareto efficient situation. To
decide which of these points yields maximum social welfare we need an
interpersonal comparison of the individual consumer's utility. In a
subsequent section we will show that the Pareto- optimal state is a necessary
but not sufficient condition for maximum social welfare.
The Kaldor-Hicks Compensation Principle
(IMPORTANT)
Nicholas Kaldor and J.R.Hicks put forwarded the welfare criterion based
upon the compensating payments in 1939. If a certain change in economic
organization or policy, according to Kaldor, makes some people better off
and the others worse off, there will be a net increase in social welfare, when
the gainers in welfare compensate the losers and are still better off than
before.
Assumptions:
1. An individual himself is the best judge of his satisfaction which is
independent of the satisfaction of others.
2. There is constancy of the tastes of the individuals.
3. There can be ordinal measurement of utility.
4. The inter-personal comparisons of utilities are not possible.
5. There is an absence of externalities in production and consumption
Compensation Principle:
J.R.hicks put forwarded his compensation criterion which is the
reverse of Kaldor’s criterion. According to him, if an economic change
makes some people better off and the others worse off and the losers cannot
bribe the gainers not to make the given change, then there is an increase in
the net welfare of the society from that economic change. Suppose the
government proposes to impose a tax which will benefit some and harm
others. If the latter fail to bribe
the government officials not to introduce the proposed tax, then the given
change in tax policy will result in a net increase in the welfare of the society.
Prof. hick has given his criterion from the loser's point of view, whereas
Kaldor had formulated this criterion from the gainer's point of view. Though
the two criteria are exposed differently, but they are really the same. Thus,
that is why the two criteria are generally called by a single name, ‘Kaldor-
Hicks Criterion'. (Nicholas Kaldor, 1939).