Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Research Proposal
Presented to
In Partial Fulfillment
Submitted by
Mikalea B. Mendez
Rain M. Guillermo
Rihana M. Rapiz
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Theoretical Framework------------------------------2
Conceptual Framework------------------------------3
alongside being the start of their journey to the real world. Thus, it is important that they
be able to pick a course that is suited to them and their abilities, this is in order for them
to be comfortable and be able to excel in their work. However, many students' college
course may be highly influenced by their family's socioeconomic status, and they may
have to adjust to their financial capabilities (i.e. an aspiring medical student choosing
courses may vary when it comes to tuition fee and the price of materials and such within
the course.
Due to this, many students may not be able to choose what they actually aspire
to be, but rather be forced to settle for a course that is more manageable given their
explores the topic of the Free Tuition Act and the advantage of students with higher
the current study focuses on the impact of the students’ socioeconomic status on their
choice of college course. The study may be a guide to colleges and universities on what
1
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
One of the prominent theories that could help students pick their college course
whilst being impacted by their socioeconomic status is the “Decision Theory”. Decision
Theory is concerned with the reasoning underlying and agent’s choice (agent stands for
an entity, usually a person capable of deliberation and action) in this case, a student
picking a college course. In any case the decision theory is a theory of beliefs and
desires. As it is a theory of choice. Now one of the 2 main concepts of the Decision
For example: If a student picks College Course A over College B, meaning they
find College Course A to be more desirable than College Course B. Nevertheless, there
is room for argument on what preferences over options actually amount to, or in other
words, what actually factors into a student’s decision making if their preferences align
with their options, If a student has a high socioeconomic status, they can definitely
a student has a low socioeconomic status, chances are their options are far less. Whilst
the model of Hossler’s and Gallagher’s tackle more on college choice only, their model
consists of 3 different phases, though the first phase is mainly what this paper is
focused on, and that would be the Predisposition phase. The predisposition phase is a
developmental phase in which students determine whether or not they would like to
cumulative effect on college enrolment plans. It is said that High SES students are more
likely to go to college than low SES students. The second stage of this modal is called
right characteristics to consider and other college alternatives that a student can pick.
While the third stage is that of choice, which is to put it simply, deciding what college a
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
3
With Decision Theory, the 2 factors/ideas that go into using this theory are the options
and the preferences, so as stated before the preferences can help with choosing the
college course, but as stated earlier the agent’s concerns can also factor in picking the
decision, in this case it’s the socioeconomic status. The phases of Hossler’s and
Gallagher’s model, specifically the first phase, which is if the student is thinking if they
should continue their education or not, and a lot of background characteristics can
factor into that, one of them would be the SES (socioeconomic status) of the student.
1.1 Career
and guide college students in prioritizing what college courses suits them
course selection. This information may be helpful in the development of inclusive and
Legislators
Department of Education
Knowing how socioeconomic status (SES) affects college course choices may
Educators
from different socioeconomic situations. This information can help guarantee that
Students
students can make more informed decisions about their academic paths. This
understanding can help students choose courses that align with their interests,
Future Researchers
background, we can all benefit from a more equal and accessible educational
students' decisions.
6
parental income, education level, family wealth, and employment as key SES drivers.
ethnicity, and geographical location. Furthermore, the research will examine college
specific degrees within these categories. A timeframe for data collection and analysis
employment.
The study will concentrate on four-year colleges and universities, not community
impact course selection, but they will be excluded from the scope of the research.
Furthermore, rather than adopting a global perspective, the geographic area will be
meaningful results.
7
The Variables relevant to the study will be operationally defined in this study to
College. The school the student chooses to attend during their years in college.
College Course. The course the student chooses to take during their years in
college.
Tuition Fee. Refers to the total cost of the school year in the school the student
chooses to attend.