Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://www.emerald.com/insight/1355-5855.htm
The authors are most grateful for unrelenting helpful comments and suggestions of the editor and the
three referees. The first author would like to acknowledge the continued support from Asia University,
Prof. Wing-Keung Wong, California State University San Bernardino and Dean Lawrence C. Rose. The
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing
second author would like to express gratitude to the National Central University, School of Management, and Logistics
and Business Administration Department. Finally, thanks to Mr. Faraj Rafiei for English editing of the © Emerald Publishing Limited
1355-5855
manuscript. DOI 10.1108/APJML-07-2019-0442
APJML 1. Introduction
Social media influence in our personal and professional lives is increasing. Companies and
businesses are engaging with their customers through social media platforms daily. The
revolution of social media applications has changed the way people and businesses are
interconnected. In this respect, airline companies have shown great interest in using social
networks such as Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube (Koch and Tritscher, 2017).
Given that nowadays, the airline industry must survive in a highly competitive
environment using social media technologies to maintain competitive advantages in the
marketplace is necessary (Oliverwyman, 2017). The growing importance of such applications
has remarkably influenced the way organizations to attract customers. The fast rate of
technological transformation has also changed consumer online behavior. Since consumers
spend a considerable amount of time on social media and participate in online discussions or
share experiences with other consumers, organizations are more active in cyberspace to
conduct their advertising and marketing programs (Evans, 2010; Ismail, 2017; Phau and
Meng Poon, 2000). The social media marketing approach provides new opportunities and
challenges for companies to improve their customers’ purchase intention (Ismail, 2017). Hinz
et al. (2011) stated that when making a purchase decision, consumers highly depend on their
social network comments and reviews. Several studies have described the pivotal role of
social networks as ideal platforms for interaction that fits perfectly with marketing in the
cyber landscape (Kamboj, 2018; Kim and Ko, 2010; Lopez et al., 2016).
Social media empowers companies to engage with the customers easily. Compared to
traditional marketing, social media marketing approach is a cost-efficient way of
communication that is broadly offered by the majority of companies and accepted by
consumers in different businesses (Kim and Ko, 2012). In the airline industry, where the
competition is high, interaction with consumers while providing a pleasant personal
experience for them can improve the marketing of products and services (Ahmad et al., 2016).
According to the internet World Stat report, Indonesia, with over 143 million users, has the
third-largest number of Internet consumers and the fourth number of Facebook users in the
world (Miniwatts Marketing Group, 2019). Therefore, the growing interest in social media
and digital interactivity necessitates further exploration of social media marketing to
promote products and services.
This research aims to evaluate the effect of using social media marketing (hereinafter
referred to as SMM) on purchasing decision making among Indonesians. This study proposes
the role of SMM as an independent variable. Furthermore, we investigate the mediating effect
of customer trust and perceived value on the influence of SMM on purchasing decision
making. The foundations of this study are the theory of reasoned action (hereinafter referred
to as TRA) and value-based adoption model (hereinafter referred to as VAM). A review of the
literature reveals that both defined theories are applicable in diverse fields of study (Armitage
and Conner, 2001; Kim et al., 2007). Thus, contributions of this study to scholars and
practitioners are multifaceted. First, the framework represents the influence of SMM factors
on consumers’ trust and perceived value, which, in return, affect purchase intention. Then,
the applicability of VAM and TRA theories is extended to the current context. Last, research
findings enable marketers to predict the most influential factors that assist SMM subsets that
impact consumer purchasing intent. The results of this study ultimately assist airline
marketing decision-makers in preparing new strategic marketing approaches to motivate
consumers’ purchase intention. The conclusion section includes a detailed discussion of the
implications of this study.
In this paper, social media marketing (SMM) refers to a habitual and a general
conversation among people about a topic of mutual interest (Shareef et al., 2019) in social
media. Dimensions of SMM include (1) entertainment (hereinafter referred to as ENT) as a
form of communication that reaches audiences and gives some pleasure to them
(Bates and Ferri, 2010; Kim and Ko, 2012), (2) interaction (hereinafter referred to as INT) as Social media
users ability of actively exchanging online information (Jiang et al., 2010; Kim and Ko, 2010; marketing of
Kirk et al., 2015; Yang and Shen, 2018). In our hypothesized model, we propose two mediating
variables. One of the mediating variables is the perceived value (hereinafter referred to as PV)
airline
describing the worth that a product or service has in the consumer’s mind (Chen and Chen, products
2010; Zeithaml, 1988). Another mediating variable is trust (hereinafter referred to as TR),
representing consumers’ level of tendency relying on a specific organization’s capability to
execute a promised utility (Chaudhuri and Holbrook, 2001; Hong and Cha, 2013). This study
investigates the intermediary influence of these two variables, TR and PV, on purchase
intention (hereinafter referred to as PI). PI is an element of the consumer’s cognitive behavior
representing the probability of purchasing a specific product or service (Dodds et al., 1991;
Duffet, 2017).
2.2 Trust
In online marketing, the concept of TR is a critical driving force that directly influences customer
PI (Liu and Tang, 2018). Precisely defining TR is difficult because it is complex and highly
subjective (Gefen et al., 2003). In a general sense, TR is the consumer’s willingness to believe in
the seller’s actions and promises based on the consumer’s expectation (Mayer et al., 1995). TR is
typically built through personal contact and face-to-face communication. This concept is also
true in business settings and particularly in collectivist cultures. Collectivism is a cultural theory
based on the idea that the good of a group takes priority over the welfare of the individual. A
more interpersonal relationship among consumers of a particular company can motivate them to
offer recommendations influencing their purchasing behavior (Fan et al., 2018).
Marketing practitioners are aware of the significance of TR and particularly its influence
on consumer’s decisions. Scholars show continuous interest in identifying the determinants
APJML that impact TR in cyberspace (Choi and Lee, 2017; See-To and Ho, 2014; Kim and Peterson,
2017). Hubert et al. (2018) explained that TR influences consumers’ willingness to commence
interacting with others in an online environment.
Young Kim and Kim (2004) specified TR as the belief that others will act in responsible
behavior in an interchange relationship. According to Kim and Ko (2010), TR is a level of the
tendency to rely on a particular organization’s capability to execute a promised utility.
While in the e-marketplace, uncertainty always exists, trust can be a vital element to
mitigate the feelings of ambiguity (Yao-Hua Tan, 2000). Thus, TR is considered a significant
component to strengthen the relationship between customers and organizations built
through a continuing relationship. Indeed, social interactions and frequent communications
are trust (TR) boosters (Kaur and Khanam Quareshi, 2015). Past related studies mostly relied
on the theory of reasoned action (TRA) ( Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975) to explain increased
purchase intention (PI) through an elevated perceived trust (Aziz et al., 2019; Hajli et al., 2017;
Pappas, 2016; Weisberg et al., 2011). However, in the SMM context, uncertainty regarding
how this theory motivates intention exists. Based on TRA, personal belief or individual
perception influences behavioral intention. Our understanding of TR relies on the proposed
approach by Fishbein and Ajzen (1975).
Trust is a vital component of the relationship between a person and society. Trust has an
influential role in affecting consumers’ purchasing intention (Hong and Cha, 2013; Kaur and
Khanam Quareshi, 2015; Kim and Ko, 2010; Li et al., 2007; Lin and Lu, 2010). TR is the
customers’ reliance that a specific organization or company will not act in a way that harms
them (Hong and Cha, 2013). TR is an assurance that the purchaser plans to purchase a
particular service or product, believing that the company will not conduct an activity that can
hurt them (Kaur and Khanam Quareshi, 2015).
One reason that a customer may decide not to buy a product or service is the lack of trust
in the selling partner’s business practices. In an SMM campaign, companies have to build the
consumers’ trust to increase PI (Li et al., 2007). Thus, we propose:
H5. TR has a significant positive effect on the PI.
3. Method
3.1 Scale operationalization
We adopted the measurement scales from previous related researches to assess the
constructs of interest and slightly modified the original items to fit the current research
environment. The research instrument contained demographic and construct item sections.
APJML The antecedents in the research framework, including ENT, and INT, were adopted from Kim
and Ko (2010); Kim and Ko (2012), and Godey et al. (2016). ENT, and INT, each comprised of
three items. The mediating variable, PV, was assessed using an adapted version of the scale
suggested by Chen and Chen (2010). TR, the mediator, was measured by the scale drawn from
Hong and Cha (2013), and each consisted of three items. A four-item scale developed by
Duffett (2017) was employed to access outcome purchase intention (PI). We derived all
measurement scales from English sources. Given that the field survey was Indonesia, where
the official language is Bahasa, we used a back-translation procedure to ensure the quality
and accuracy of the translation. We designed the questionnaire according to related literature
and experts’ opinions. After the draft was completed and translated, a pretest was
administered to a small sample group to single out ambiguous items. Small sample
questionnaire respondents verified that they could understand the questions in the formal
survey. Through this process, therefore, the initial content validity of the questionnaire was
ensured.
We conducted CFA to confirm the factors of the measurement model, and the results were
satisfactory. The results of the model fit for CFA and the proposed model are satisfactory and
all model fit indices exceed the minimum criteria recommended by previous studies: χ 2/
df 5 2.22, p 5 0.000, GFI 5 0.94, CFI 5 0.97, TLI 5 0.96, RMSEA 5 0.06 (Table 4).
χ /df
2
<3 2.00 2.22
GFI >0.8 0.91 0.94
CFI >0.9 0.96 0.97 Table 4.
TLI >0.9 0.95 0.96 Model fit indices of the
RMSEA ≤0.08 0.06 0.06 measurement model
ENT
Entertainment H1 = 0.55***
H2 = 0.59*** TR
Trust
H7 (a,b) H5 = 0.56***
PI
Purchase Intention
H6 = 0.45***
H3 = 0.23*
PV
Perceived Value
H4 = 0.10 (NS)
H8 (a,b)
INT
Interaction
Figure 1.
Structural
equation model
Note(s): *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; NS = Not Significant
Further reading
Cheung, C.M. and Lee, M.K. (2012), “What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth
in online consumer-opinion platforms”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 218-225,
doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.01.015.
Cronan, T.P., Mullins, J.K. and Douglas, D.E. (2018), “Further understanding factors that explain
freshman business students’ academic integrity intention and behavior: plagiarism and sharing
homework”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 147 No. 1, pp. 197-220, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-
2988-3.
Dellarocas, C. (2003), “The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback
mechanisms”, Management Science, Vol. 49 No. 10, pp. 1407-1424, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.10.
1407.17308.
Eisingerich, A.B., Chun, H.H., Liu, Y., Jia, H.M. and Bell, S.J. (2015), “Why recommend a brand face-to-
face but not on Facebook? How word-of-mouth on online social sites differs from traditional
word-of-mouth”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 120-128, doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.
2014.05.004.
Kucukemiroglu, S. and Kara, A. (2015), “Online word-of-mouth communication on social networking
sites: an empirical study of Facebook users”, International Journal of Commerce and
Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 2-20, doi: 10.1108/IJCoMA-11-2012-0070.
Mehrad, D. and Mohammadi, S. (2017), “Word of Mouth impact on the adoption of mobile banking in
Iran”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34 No. 7, pp. 1351-1363, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.009.
Corresponding author
Alaleh Dadvari can be contacted at: ala.dadvari@gmail.com; dadvari.alaleh@g.ncu.edu.tw
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com