Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tracey Hilton Part 1

    Uploaded by

    documents
    320 views49 pages
    Tracey Hilton Files Part 1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tracey Hilton Files Part 1

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    320 views49 pages

    Tracey Hilton Part 1

    Uploaded by

    documents
    Tracey Hilton Files Part 1

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 49
    Zo CASE NO.CV02-02302 . CHRISTOPHER SCOTT REICHMAN VS. TRACEY HILTON Date, Judge, Officers of Court Present APPEARANCES/HEARING October 27, 2003 HEARING-REVIEW The HONORABLE ‘Applicant present with Counsel, Richard Salvatore, Esq. Adverse Party C. COOKE, not present or represented. The Advp was mailed notice of today’s COURT MASTER hearing. Court advised Applicant that the Adverse Party’s Motion Dept. No. DM3 ‘would be denied for failure to appear. R. Salvatore addressed the Court R. ANDERSON, and stated that his client is upset that he keeps getting called back to Clerk Court, which is costing him money. Reporter-Audio ORDER: The Court, having received the Motion filed on Apri 18, 2003, Setting ‘and/or having considered the filings, testimony and evidence presented at 0-161 hearing, or having determined that no hearing is necessary, and having jurisdiction over the parties, the Court enters the following Itis hereby ORDERED that the Order for Protection Against Domestic Violence originally issued on, 01/15/03, in the above entitled case shall remain in full force and effect. Based on the Adverse Party's failure to appear the Adverse Party's Motion filed April 18, 2003 is denied. ‘THIS ORDER WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL 11:59 P.M. ON 01/14/04, UNLESS THE JUDGE ORDERS OTHERWISE. SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION FAMILY VIOLENCE DEPARTMENT MOTION WORKSHEET casewo._C tee Motion file date,_ 3/26 Date received: Sh Depthio._QA( To Court Master:__V. VAW METER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED: fh / 'y, {ye O Need file pulled. Case No. Ci Check for related cases. CO Need additional signature, From: Need verification of service. O Other: ciee’s notes: Extended Ord. iSSued om (“1503 Fup Wad Semed _ub[ Exferded Ueda. om 0-21-03. The _pervoel_14 whak fo lntblt aad Jor Dbypect- hea lng peot . Clerk: kA Date_ F/2f PREPARE ORDER: Motion is denied. Motion is granted. Motion is granted in par. CO Set hearing: expedited. emergency. special set. regular basis. - Oi Current Order is Cl éissolved, Cl extended pending hearing, CI modified, as follows: Att Motion e_Caukst Disele a afo Likewise, App\iourt's Masel 24,2003, Maton to Piralve ums pil dim_Wore than 2 days aber Tan 15,2002, anc 1s Pherchy ake Aewed ot uvttivne la. Cl Order to Show Causz. Specify possible 0 incarceration Ci community service O fine. Court Master: Clerk: date: SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION FAMILY VIOLENCE DEPARTMENT MOTION WORKSHEET [h,, a 230% byo2 2 : ti Motion file date:_] [20 DMN tocou maser (py brake (CASE NO. Date received:. a D Need file pulled. Case No. © Check for related cases. O Need additional signature. From: Ol Need verification of service. O Other: Clerk's notes: Clerk Date: _ Le Tore Y PREPARE ORDER: BS fata 2 /[0 Wes. Ci Motion is denied. . “ p © Motion is granted. Sheer awh life On chow © Motion is granted in part. Uat cs srrternsley gh — Gi Set hearing: expedited. emergency. special set. regular basis, 1D Current Order is O dissolved, Ci extended pending hearing, C) modified, as follows: Order to Show Cause. Specify possible 0 incarceration C1 community service O) fine. » Clerk: Site: Court Master: CASE NO.CV02-02302 Date, Judge, Officers of Court Present January 15, 2003 ‘The HONORABLE V. VAN METER, COURT MASTER Dept. No. DMI R. ANDERSON, Clerk Reporter-Audio Setting 747-1315 CHRISTOPHER SCOTT REICHMAN VS. TRACEY HILTON APPEARANCES/HEARING HEARING-TO DETERMINE IF A TPO SHOULD ISSUE “Applicant present with Counsel, Ian Silverberg, Esq. Adverse Party not present or represented. Advp served with notice of today’s hearing. Mr. Silverberg provided a faxed copy of Mr. Egan Walker, Esq. Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. Mr. Silverberg addressed the Court and ‘questioned his client with regard to his Application. Applicant testified in support of his Application about telephone calls and destruction of property by the Advp. Witness for Applicant, Patricia Keezie, took the stand was sworn and testified about seeing the Advp outside of the Applicant’s home. ORDER: TO THE ADVERSE PART YOU ARE PROHIBITED, either directly or through an agent, from threatening, physically injuring or harassing the above-named Applicant. ‘andlor minor child(ren), and from selling, damaging, destroying, gWving ‘away, or otherwise disposing of, or tampering with, any property ‘owned by the Applicant, orn which Applicant has an interest, ‘YOU ARE PROHIBITED from any contact whatsoever with the Applicant, including but not limited to, in person, by telephone, through the mail, through electronic mail (e-mail), or through another person; "X_ YOU ARE EXCLUDED AND ORDERED to stay at least 100 yards ‘away from Applicant's residence located at CI CONFIDENTIAL, or BISBY RENO WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, or any other place ‘that Applicant may reside. YOU shall not interfere with Applicent’s possession and use of residence, including utilities, phones, leases and other related residential services; _X_ YOU ARE EXCLUDED AND ORDERED to stay at least 100 yards ‘away from the minor child(reny's school, or day care, located at C] ‘CONFIDENTIAL, or I DILWORTH MIDDLE SCHOOL 255 PRATER WAY SPARKS WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA or any other school or day care that the child(ren) may be attending; X__ YOU ARE EXCLUDED AND ORDERED to stay at least 100 yards ‘away from Applicant's place of employment located at COO CONFIDENTIAL, or USPS 1490 STARDUST RENO WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA or any colher place that Applicant may be employed. YOU ARE PROHIBITED from ‘ny contact whatsoever with Applicant's place of employment, in person, by telephone, by mail, or any other means of communication; ‘THIS ORDER WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL 11:59 P.M. ON THE DATE SET FORTH ON PAGE 1, UNLESS THE JUDGE ORDERS OTHERWISE. CASE NO: CV02-02302 Date, Judge, Officers CHRISTOPHER S. REICHMAN VS. TRACEY HILTON of Court Present APPEARANCES/HEARING December 19, 2002 HEARING-HEARING TO ISSUE ‘The HONORABLE “Applicant present, represented by Egan Walker. Adverse Party not V. VAN METER present or represented, nor was there any proof that the Adverse Party COURT MASTER had ever been served with notice of today's hearing. Dept. No. DM3 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the Hearing to Issue an Order M. Szabo, for Protection Against Domestic Violence filed on, December 6, 2002, Clerk in the above-entitled case is continued to January 15, 2003 at 10:00am. Reporter-Audio Setting CASE NO.CV02-02302 Date, Judge, Officers of Court Present November 13, 2002 ‘The HONORABLE V. VAN METER, COURT MASTER Dept. No. DMI R. ANDERSON, Clerk Reporter-Audio Setting 2285-7106 Tape 1 0-1152 Tape 2 CHRISTOPHER SCOTT REICHMAN VS. TRACEY HILTON APPEARANCES/HEARING HEARING-EXTENSION ‘Applicant present, pro per. Adverse Party present with Counsel, Egan Walker, Esq. Parties swom. Applicant testified that the statements made in his application are truthful and that this isthe first peace he has had in 8 months since the phone calls and e mails have stopped. E. ‘Walker questioned the Applicant. Advp's Exhibit 1 and 2 marked and admitted. Applicant's rebuttal testimony. Court read aloud the DV Statute and asked Applicant to focus on any harassment. Applicant testified about phone calls and ¢ mails. ORDER: Temporary Protection Order dissolved No legal basis to extend. Page 1 EXHIBITS ‘Case No, CV02-02302 Dept. No. DMI Date: 11/13/02 Clerk: R. Anderson a Exhibit No. Description Marked | Offered | Admitted Adverse | 1 page e mail message x x x Party #1 1302. | 11/13/02. | 11/13/02 Adverse | 6 page e mail message x x x Party #2 11/13/02 | 11/13/02} 11/13/02 Word has it the guy you are seeing now has been calling on his ex-girlfriend. Claims it’s because it’s the best he’s ever had. Real nice what that says about you. Knowing first hand how you don’t like to share, thought you might want to check it out sooner rather than find out later. You really know how to pick ‘em babe. Take care. B.H. Adverse Pasty | rortdent: 3/22/02 1am not sure what you are calling about now; but, | will not be returning any of your calls until you are ready to be honest. I'm guessing you are trying to turn my thoughtfulness in sending Ryan a birthday card into something you can hurt me with yet again. The part you are probably most uptight about is that my actions have contradicted all the negative misconceptions you have been feeding him. | wanted Ryan to feel he could say hello to me when he sees me. Your phone message and accusations last night were way out of ine. I don’t know what cat is out of the bag or who “everyone' is. | told you | discussed your behavior with my brother, a co-worker, and an ex-boyfriend. Who knows, maybe Charlene slept with the ex-boyfriend or the co-worker or a friend of theirs, That's my best guess. Do you remember who was standing around you that could have overheard you talking to your bowling buddies about my body? Was JD around? The only other person I told was Patti. I called her and she said she did not tell anyone. She said that you told her | had been calling you. Your lies never end, do they. And you carefully calculated to tell them to someone who is probably eager to believe them right now. You may fee! | am an easy target for you to blame all your problems on; but, you are being paranoid ‘and once again, blowing things way out of proportion. You need to be rational. There is no way | could call anyone without the number being identified. The police can even tell you that. | only called Charlene’s house the one time looking for you. We get hangups on Duane’s machine daily. You can ask him. Other than telemarketer's, didn't you say Charlene’s had kids living with her? It could be kids calling. | have had no reason to call you. | wrote in my last note to you that | did not wish to talk to you until you were ready to be honest. I don't know anything about any letters other than the one’s Ihave given you. tf you chose to let Charlene read them, that is your problem. You said this letter she has said something only | would know. You are wrong. You also know. So, who have you been talking to? Maybe you are saying and doing all this to get Charlene's attention. | don't know. It sounds like you are only digging yourself deeper into your disillusions. While | understand the reason you created all the misconceptions about me in your mind to help yourself bury your true feelings, they are very unfair and hurtful to everyone (you, Ryan, Charlene and me). It's the same thing you did in September, April and last January. Deep inside, you know it isn't really how you feel or think, Otherwise, you would have never showed up at the airport or called the night before Valentine's. All these games you are playing have obviously not stopped you from thinking about, missing, and wanting me. Your call before Valentine's Day was proof of that. Beer has always been your truth serum. Alcohol makes people lose their inhibitions, allowing their true thoughts and feelings to surface. Examples of when alcohol has made you uninhibited were many times camping, that November night you came home after gotf and were sick, last New Year's Eve when you stopped by my apartment, 4" of July out at your brothers, and bowling on a few occasions now. What a productive conversation we could have if we were both to get a litle buzzed and sit down and talk. You would be honest and { wouldn't be crying. I've found an ancient book in my mom's “library” regarding stress and meditating it away. It has been very useful for the many balls | have juggling in the air right now. It has also provided some great methods of being more tolerable with people who | know are lying to me. (No, it is NOT just you.) | have had a low tolerance for lies all my life. And, then | get angry that I allowed those people to get a reaction out of me. So, | am leaning how to be more tolerable by changing my perspective when this. happens, The book has also provided some great insight for me about our relationship. | am hoping some of these revelations might also help you. They are not ‘my analysis” as you like to label them, but e Adverse @) 2 For Ident. ‘mereiy philosophies observed by the two doctors who have written the book. They start by defining the many sources of anxiety. Everything comes down to a person's “perception” of events or environments and the ability to change that perception to be less threatening or important. They talk about the type A and type B personalities, which we both fit in the middle of. We are both competitive, self-demanding with a sense of pressure to accomplish, do not have the tendency to “loaf,” and prefer a structured environment. We like to know the details of what will happen when, like to be early or on time to events, and use lists (camping, groceries, to do, etc.). We both are easy going for the most part, but can show anger when provoked. We like to have fun and are witty. | believe these are some of the core reasons we “fit” so well, as you have said. Throughout our relationship, most of our perceptions and expectations were in synch. We thought each other's thoughts. Of the few times they weren't, common understanding was reached within a few questions and answers. The only times that became an issue were times when we weren't even on the same page about what the misunderstanding really was. Your perception of why we aren't together is because | “drive you crazy.” Most people | know say this as a compliment. Everyone's partner drives them crazy with little oddities about themselves. It gives them something to laugh at each other about. But, you apparently are not meaning it as a compliment. You have not been willing to clarify this for me probably because it is invalid or you have exaggerated an incident. Therefore, | will ry to clarify other statements you have made or issues | can only guess you could be possibly referring to. {recall my confusion about why you were going to put a piece of my mail on your mailbox instead of taking it with you to work (the one and only time | ever took you up on your offer to). Your perception of my confusion was that | was questioning your knowledge of the US Mail system. After you lectured ‘me, you reminded me you had the day off. | then understood why you said to put it on your mailbox. But, by that time my feelings were hurt from being accused of something | have never done (question your knowledge). I have only ever inquired as to the how and why about something (i.e. golf, woodwork, etc.) in order to fully understand something you were telling me or something | was interested in. | would also ask questions sometimes to give you the opportunity to toot your horn, so to speak, in an effort to give you more confidence in yourseff. But, that night | left without explaining why | wouldn't leave my mail on your mailbox. My preference not to leave my credit card payment on your mailbox had nothing to do with you. | started taking all my mail directly to the post office about 7 years ago after Peggy and Peter had there mail stolen from their mailbox (on St.Lawrence Avenue of all places). Peggy had to go the bank to stop payments and one had already been cashed! | have also seen the stories on the news of US Mail boxes being stolen completely out of the ground right here in Reno. They had even blocked the deposit box at the Villager Apartments because people were continuously breaking into it. | would think this would make a carriers load lighter, too. At any rate, it NEVER was anything to do with you or your knowledge about the US Mail. Labor Day weekend at Boca was another instance where our perceptions of what the misunderstanding was differed. | think “our” group was a little displaced that the occasion was not what we had envisioned for the weekend. And, perhaps this frustration was taken out in other ways leaving emotions and actions wide open for misinterpretation. | know you didn't like having to drive into work. And, believe me, | missed you terribly. It felt so empty without you there and I was anxious to see you. | had a feeling you wouldn't like coming back to an empty camp and | wanted to stay. But, Patti, Jeff, Mike, and Kelly said we wouldn't stay that long and be back before you would get there. | wish now I would have stuck to my gut feeling. You were in a foul mood when we got back. | wasn't sure if il was just a bad day at work or that you may have felt left out. At any rate, nothing | said or did pleased you. You were determined to take whatever out on me. | finally gave up and went back to the camper. Other than making love, the best memory | have of that weekend is when @ 2 @ youwalked behind me Sunday morning and caressed my hair. That was the only time you ever did that. Much like you enjoy having your scalp massaged, most women like having their hair or cheek caressed. The Concert Under the Stars was, to me, the worst of all our misunderstandings. Perceptions on everyone's part were misdirected. But, you and | got past it without anyone sticking their head in the sand OR denying feelings. Nor did it scare us into thinking we didn't want to continue our relationship. The point here is there ARE misunderstandings in EVERY relationship. There is NO way to avoid them. Most of them are so minor, no one recognizes them as a misunderstanding. The key is putting them in perspective and not making them personal. Our misunderstandings were petty ‘compared to what happened on September 11". This is the one event I thought would have been capable of snapping you out of your state of denial. It made everyone but apparently you realize how short life can be and how time was no longer a commodity we could afford to waste. But, you still continued to tell me you did not want a future with me. You have labeled my desire to understand your perspective as “over analyzing.” All my management courses in college taught us that it was human nature to desire to understand behaviors and environments of that around us. Even though you refuse to admit it, you too need to have an understanding of events. You were searching for an answer to ‘why’ in September when | came by to pick up the refrigerated items. | distinctly remember you asking, ‘what happened?" To which | replied, ‘Where have you been the past month?” You then responded, “not here?” | was so exhausted from being played like a yo-yo by you, | didn’t see the sense in discussing it yet again only for you to tell me we had no future. You told me the week before Rocky and Sheila's wedding that you had no interest in staying in a relationship with me. Then the next time | would talk to you, you would say you cared about me and wanted to be together. Then the next time you told me you didn't think we would still be together by the time New Year's arrived. Then you would tell me a good woman is hard to find and that you felt | was a good woman. Then you would tell me we weren't going to stay together. And so on, and so on. What | heard you telling me was that you wanted me but had no intentions of keeping me. | didn't see the point of prolonging the agony. So, | gave in to what YOU were telling me that YOU were going to make happen anyway. As far as | could tell, the wedding spooked both of us into thinking about where our relationship was heading. | think we both felt pressured to have a plan and neither one of us was ready to make one. The only thing | felt sure of that we had discussed was that we wanted to grow old together. I had no clue when or where that would end up being. Marriage is another one of those things that | thought would happen when I found the person I could trust my heart with. | was apparently wrong to entrust it to you. At my age, marriage really isn't that important anymore. Dad has pretty much invested my dowry in his body anyway. At least it has gone to good use! At any rate, anything further out than the next year or two was too far for me to try and envision. My focus was envisioning the accomplishment of our goals for the next year or two, am really not good at envisioning my life more than a year out. All| had envisioned was getting my house, getting my life back in order, and doing things when | could with you and Ryan. | did think you would be more willing to spend time at my place once in a while since ! would now have a house instead of an apartment. I did sense you didn't ike apartments. | also wanted Ryan (and you) to feel comfortable about coming over with you once in awhile. Perhaps even have dinner and stay over the Friday nights you needed someone to chaperone him the Saturdays you had to work. | did hope to cook more dinners like the one | prepared for you when you came back from the Houseboat trip, as well as Monday Night Football dinners and possibly a gathering for the Concert Under the Stars. e 3 @ You always seemed to be under the misconception that | expected you to live with me. I never ~ invited you to. | merely wanted you to feel welcome to do whatever you wanted to make yourself comfortable in my, home. Whether it was merely a toothbrush or storing a couple of your saws that you don't use very often so that you would have more room to work in your own garage. Or all the saws So that you could park in your own garage. The point is, once again, | was willing to do whatever YOU wanted to make you happy. Because when you were happy, | was happy. When you were irritated with someone, | was supportive of your feelings. After that night before Valentine's Day and the night of, 1 now know neither one of us truly feels our relationship should have ended, No matter how hard we have both tried to forget, that night was evident we both miss not only the physical part, but also the comfort of being able to share dreams, the warmth of being deeply loved, and the comfort of someone truly vested in your thoughts and what is going on in your life, not just listening to be polite. When you were being honest, Chris, | felt so safe and secure in our relationship. In September, | knew you were setting me up for the same torment you put me through the previous holiday season, and | just couldn't go through it again. Nor could | continue to wait around for you to stop denying your true feelings. The very ones you revealed (once again) that Wednesday and Thursday night. If only you could reach a maturity where you stop denying yourself love and remain true to your feelings instead of playing this game......... Comparing Charlene and | are like comparing apples and oranges. | will tr to help you understand how your perspective is invalid. She has not allowed you to hurt her the way you have hurt me. She can only be hurt by the one her heart belongs to, and we both know that is not you. It's her married man. She does not know you as well as | do to know when you are lying to her, or how your avoidance to talk about something is your way of hiding secrets. She doesn't know you have been unfaithful. I'm sure she was naive enough to buy what ever line you have fed her about me. Or maybe, she just doesn't care if she isn't planning on keeping you around after Mexico. Maybe the trip has her feeling obligated to stay with you until then, You say she “tells” you that you are a nice person. No one has said you aren't capable of being a “nice” person. (Although, last night made it very hard to believe.) | thought you were wonderful or else | couldn't have possibly fallen as deeply in love with you. | spent most of our relationship trying to instill some confidence in yourself in that respect. However, please don't confuse her lack of exposure to your occasional disrespectful behavior as knowing any better. 1am sure you have not shown her the disrespect you have subjected me to. | doubt she would have tolerated you striping her of her dignity in front of your family by demonstrating to everyone your preference of sleeping on a couch instead of in your own bed with her. | doubt she would appreciate your making a spectacle over other women’s breast. | doubt she would have even stuck around the night of the Concert Under the Stars. | doubt she would tolerate you declaring feelings for her and then denying them. | doubt if she would have appreciated you kicking her in the ass in the middle of a room crowded with very few people she knew. If she had feelings for you, | doubt she would not have tolerated you socializing with ex-girffriends. It amazes me that you refuse to see how disrespectful it was for you to {go over to her house while we were dating. | am sure you would not have been understanding if | were going over to an ex-boyfriends to help with his computer. How can you get so irritated with being around a guy | had a meaningless one-night stand with 20-years ago and no longer even talk to and not expect me to be hurt by your carrying on with someone who DID mean something to you and that you have obviously continued to carry a torch for throughout our relationship? You even got irritated when you found out a guy gave me a massage at one of my sessions through the University program. Why did it matter? You certainly never offered no matter how many I gave you! Duane told me Mom has never asked him not to attend the Lions Club events. He does it out of respect for their relationship. People like you, who purposely tempt fate don’t appreciate how lucky they are to have a good person in their life. That is a maturity you have yet to understand, | guess. e 4 e Your attempt to hurt me with a remark that Charlene could even possibly be more understanding where your children are concerned than | am is nothing but another attempt to lessen your guilt of never appreciating that | went above and beyond understanding. Many people with children have attested to this. Your perception is invalid because I have ALWAYS put your children first (after you, of course). | was the one that wanted to make sure it was okay with Melonie that I move in, remember? | made every attempt for you to spend as much time with them as possible. | tried to stay away on Friday's so you all could have some time for just you. | tried to help Ryan do things for you on Saturdays, because I did not see anyone else encouraging him to think about you. | was the ‘one you were asking to talk to your daughter about your displeasure with her. I was the one you asked to get her a Christmas gift. | was the one that could see she wanted to give you a hug good bye that night at the ball field before she left for Hawaii. | really wish | would have been given the ‘opportunity to do things for and with my father when I was younger. Because of this, | placed more importance on your time with them than anyone! | understood their need for your approval and praise MORE than you, | merely tried to make the opportunity more available for Ryan. You should not feel jealous of my ability to relate to kids and the talent to talk to them. There are valid reasons why kids love me. | don't buy them with gifts. | pay attention to them! You also made an unfair statement that Charlene likes to do things, which implied | did not. Your perception is invalid because there was never one thing you wanted to do that | didn't eagerly participate; even the things you dreaded like going to your parents. YOU were the one that didn't want to do things! After you continuously shot down anything | would suggest, | quickly learned not to bother. I doubt you subject Charlene to the same restrictions and excuses you put on me: money, work, kids, or being tired, Where she is concerned, money apparently is no concem for you, taking time off for her isn't a struggle, giving up your Friday night with Ryan to be with her isn’t quite the sacrifice you have always made it out to be, nor do you ever have a bad day at work to be too tired for anything. Remember, | was the one that first went with you to the casino to watch a football game. | still have the glass mug. | was the one that asked last year if you wanted to go somewhere for St. Patrick’s Day. | was the one that was willing to ride bikes with you no matter how cold it was. | was the one that initiated you into Sushi. She has never been expected to do and be all the places | was. What a luxury it must be to have time just for yourselves without family and friends interfering. She is probably naive to think you ever catered to anyone else the way you cater to her now. She doesn't realize how lucky she is that you keep her secluded. Maybe you were trying to imply she does more things for you. Then this, too, would be a misconception created to bury the truth and I'm not sure you really want to go there. Does she give you body massages or pedicures, make you frisky and young at heart, make you want to run around naked around her or tease her with your bike pants, take care of Ryan, make you want to pick her up in your arms in the backyard, take the camper out to Pyramid and set it up, rave about your newest project in the garage, attend social events with you at your family's houses, do anything and everything you ask, surprise you with a birthday party out at Pyramid, bake a cake for your daughter's, birthday, help you entertain others in your back yard, bake you cookies, bake your dessert for the office pot luck when you forget, cheer you on at your softball games no matter how cold itis, or massage your scalp? Does she show genuine interest about or to your kids and family or just politely inquire? Why did she go camping with you the first time you were dating and not now? When you stated she makes you dinner, were you trying to imply | didn't? It doesn’t surprise me that you can't remember the times | did. When you got back that summer from the Houseboat trip, you were more interested in my cooking apron as | recall. | also did a few times at your house. | would have been happy to do it every night. But, | didn't want to intrude in *your’ kitchen. I was trying to be patient for when | would have my own kitchen again, e 5 e « Knowing how much you enjoy sex, it surprises me that you say you don't have sex very often. You do realize oral stimulation is still sex, right? That confirms even more that it was our intimacy you enjoyed. It makes it confusing as to why you stay over so much. You couldn't possibly be doing it for the cuddling, which you claim makes you too hot. Is it just so you don't have to be alone? Charlene may have been just your selfish need to sleep with someone else before | had a chance to. lunderstand men do that. But, | know you also did it on some level to punish me. Usually a person tries to punish someone when they feel they have been wronged. | don't understand how you think you were wronged. | have only given you what you were telling me YOU wanted. | was not the one wanting our relationship to end. It is not my fault you weren't telling me the truth. Why did you have to lie? All of these past months didn't have to happen. Why do you insist to lie now? If you can be honest, please tell me what you would have had me do. What do you wish would have happened? Unfortunately, you will never comprehend just how too far you have gone. There is no reason in the world that could justify any human being to torture another with such an unbearable pain. Itis very obvious you have never been hurt this deeply. Because you certainly wouldn't have wished a pain this intense on someone you cared about no matter how mad you were at them. | am sure God will help me to eventually forgive you; but, at what price? It is sad to see how self-destructive you are being. You have never been able to accept | could let things go and forgive you time after time. Well, you can certainly feel pleased you have created a nightmare for me to never forget. | just can't understand how you can be so cruel when you claim to be a nice person. You can pretend you have not done anything. But, my pain is not pretend. You really have no clue as to how destructive you are being. At what point will my pain be enough for you? Do | need to develop a permanent physical setback? An ulcer? A heart attack? A stroke? Or maybe not to exist at all. Would my death be your final satisfaction? At this point, death would be a welcomed relief to this endless pain you are putting me through. Fortunately, God is the only one who has a say in that. SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION DOMESTIC MASTERS DEPARTMENT —~ TION WORK: ET casewo,__CV0a-paapa Motion fle date O/I OQ Date received {O)py [OR _~_ Dept.No__DM_ To cour Masier_@ Coste ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED: G Need file pulled. Case No. G Check for related cases. G Need additional signature. From:__ + G Need verification of service. Q Other: Clerk's notes: Clerk: Date: PREPARE ORDER: CR yee Chae eek Motion is denied. G Motion és granted. date uy Skea; G Motion is granted in part. qe hehe Ol Setheering: expedited. emergency. special set. G Current Order is CO dissolved, O extended pending Need Order to conn. Specify possible 0 narnicl community service G fine. | IN THE FAMILY DIVISION ‘SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT y ‘STATE OF NEVADA, WASHOE COUNTY PROTECTION ORDER WORKSHEET 7) an Case No. ~ORB0X om Lo/afex Previous TPO? Y N Granted on , Parties 4 Ape teat The lew dpb) [6 > nde LF Yan Aéaray Wo asec ae irene q Pe ec ccc ela ‘Case No, 0 % Dept. No. Petition filed Decree granted TPO__e_granted series, vasis: —Aareceriagt- Additional terms: PP UY Aarney— = No contact 2 Uo ust (trace et wfitSdep Good for 30 days “Set hearing (date: ) Wof2 —_—— Other: toms Recipe glen? — App b= / ekelel hy home x CTA IN: 10 " 2 3 “ 6 16 7 18 20 a 2 24 8 6 ar CODE 2700 B OCT 27 A943 IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE CHRISTOPHER SCOTT REICHMAN , Plaintiff, Case No. CV02-02302 vs. Dept. No. DM3 TRACEY R HILTON. Adverse a ‘Applicant Present: YES ‘Applicant Attomey: RICHARD SALVATORE, ESQ. ‘Adverse Party Present: NO ‘Adverse Party Attomey: N/A Presiding Judge/Court Master: CAROL A. COOKE ORDER AFTER HEARING ‘The Court, having received the Motion filed on April 18, 2003, andlor having considered the filings, testimony and evidence presented at hearing, or having determined that no hearing is necessary, and having jurisdiction over the parties, the Court enters the following: Itis hereby ORDERED that the Order for Protection Against Domestic Violence originally issued on, 01/15/03, in the above entitled case shall remain in full force and effect. Based on the Adverse Party's failure to appear the Adverse Party's Motion fled April 18, 2003 is denied. PRO: 36545 10 " 2 13 “ 15 6 7 18 19 a 2 2 26 ar 28 e ® ‘THIS ORDER WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL 11:59 P.M. ON 01/14/04, UNLESS THE JUDGE ORDERS OTHERWISE. ORDER TO THE WASHOE COUNTY SHERIFF'S. DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS/CONSTABLE (A) Any law enforcement officer who has probable cause to believe a violation of any provision of this ‘Order has occurred is ordered to arrest the Adverse Party. Such party isto be charged with a misdemeanor Violation of this Order in adaltion to any other criminal charges, which may be justified. (®) If such law enforcement officer cannot verify that the Adverse Party was served with a copy of the ‘Application and Order, the officer shall inform the Adverse Party of the specific terms of the Order, inform the Adverse Party that he/she now has notice ofthe provisions of the Order and that a violation of the Order will result in hisiher arrest, and inform the Adverse Party of the location ofthe Court that issued the Original order and the hours during which heishe can obtain a copy of the Order. The law enforcement office shall then provide written roof of notice to his agency and to the Court = af. CAROL COOKE, COURT MASTER *Objections/Appeals are governed by WOCR 24, You have ten (10) days forthe receipt ofthis Recommendation and Order within which to fle an objection or an appeal tothe District Court. ‘Acknowledgement of Receipt of Order: des L ~ pate: 0” pate: 2-2). ‘Applicant Applicants < DATE: DATE: ‘Adverse Party ‘Adverse Party's Attorney PRO: 36545 10 " 2 13 “ 6 16 ” 8 9 ‘CODE 2937 OT tee . B Or 16 A949 IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE CHRISTOPHER SCOTT REICHMAN , Applicant, Case No. CV02-02302 vs. Dept. No. DM3 TRACEY R HILTON Adverse Party. / ORDER FOR HEARINGTO EXTEND MODIFY OR DISSOLVE THE PROTECTION ORDER Upon Motion of O Applicant BlAdverse Party, to: CLEXTEND the Protection ORDER CI MODIFY the Protection ORDER CIDISSOLVE the Protection ORDER 1H OTHER _REVIEW. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a hearing will be held in the Family Division of the ‘Second Judicial District Court located at One S. Sierra Street, Third Floor, Reno, Nevada, on October 27, 2003, at 8:30 AM, to determine whether or not to EXTEND, MODIFY or DISSOLVE the PROTECTION ORDER against the above named Party. ANY PROTECTION ORDER WILL CONTINUE IN EFFECT UNTIL SUCH HEARING AND FURTHER ORDER OF THIS COURT. 10 " 2 3 “ 8 16 7 18 19 20 a 2 2 4 28 ‘A copy of the Motion for hearing, Affidavit and copy of this ORDERINotice, shall be served on the other party by EIMAIL CIPERSONAL SERVICE Dated October 16, 2003 Kettle Nenoernen JudgerHearing Master ‘Transmitted tothe state repository on October 16, 2003. LQA-——— (Clerk ofthe Court PRO: 36545 10 a n a ua 1s 16 a 18 as 20 a 2 23 Fey 25 26 2 28 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I hereby certify that I am an employee of the Second Judicial District Court, and that on this day I deposited for mailing first class postage pre-paid at Reno, Nevada, sent by inter-office mail, or had picked up, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document addressed to: CHRISTOPHER REICHMAN 45 BISBY STREET RENO, NV 89512 IAN SILVERBERG, ESQ. 96 WINTER STREET RENO, NV 89503 TRACEY HILTON 2915 ANTELLA COURT SPARKS, NV 89434 ADVERSE PARTY'S MOTION AND ORDER FOR HEARING TO EXTEND, MODIFY OR DISSOLVE THE PROTECTION ORDER. DATED: October __[ b 2003. ha A ‘Court Clerk 10 " 2 8 “ 15 16 7 16 a 2 23 24 Fy 6 ar 28 Code 1670 IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE Case No. CV02-D29)Z. Applicant, vs. / Dept. No. DM Adverse Party. J EX-PARTE MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT The above-named Applicant/Adverse Party, hereby moves the Court to grant th following relief: Extension of Order for Protection Modification of Order for Protection M Dissolve the Order for Protection Order to Show Cause Other: This motion is made for the following re reasons: ttt eee ae et iu ITA te trl poll ia} cd lf pallu eh 710 bt nye tare JB nutty Le ie ttn Pmuchddsin and she dal Lead hugal i pl his rbabd { ace Loon sith am, ( P hangs neo thbugh oil fd gd Dc Ly higethe cdleaSh partes abulodle-rmnil Chee TTI penalties of perjury ‘own personal knowledge. Dated: rect ‘Address) (City, State, Zip Code) IBZ; (Daytime Telephone Number) “O10. (Evening/Message Telephone Number) 10 a 2 a Mu as 16 a 1 Fry 20 a 2 23 Fy 2s 26 2 26 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I hereby certify that I am an employee of the Second Judicial District Court, and that on this day I deposited for mailing first class postage pre-paid at Reno, Nevada, sent by inter-office mail, or had picked up, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document addressed to: CHRISTOPHER REICHMAN 45 BISBY STREET RENO, NV 89512 IAN SILVERBERG, ESQ. 96 WINTER STREET RENO, NV 89503 TRACEY HILTON 2915 ANTELLA COURT SPARKS, NV 89434 ADVERSE PARTY'S MOTION AND ORDER FOR HEARING TO EXTEND, MODIFY OR DISSOLVE THE PROTECTION ORDER. DATED: October Lo 2003. K Ligh ‘Court Clerk 10 " 2 3 4 15 16 a 1” a 2 24 5 26 a 28 CODE 3370 IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE CHRI: HER REICHMAN, Applicant, Case No. CV02-02302 na Dept. No. DM TRACEY HILTON, Adverse Party. ORDER ‘The Court having received the Adverse Party’s Motion to Dissolve filed on March 26, 2003, and/or having considered the filings, testimony and evidence presented at hearing, or having determined that no hearing is necessary, and having jurisdiction over the parties, the Court enters the following: INis hereby ORDERED that the Extended Order for Protection Against Domestic Violence originally issued on, January 15, 2003, in the above entitled case shall remain in full force and effect. ‘The Adverse Party's Motion to Dissolve is hereby denied. A Motion to ContestDissolve a Protection Order is required to be filed within 10 days of the date the Protective Order is issued. Applicant's Motion of 1/30/03 was filed more than 10 days after January 16, 2003, the date the Extended Order for Protection was originally issued. Likewise, Applicant's March 26, 2003, Motion to Dissolve was filed more than 10 days after January 15, 2003, and is thereby also denied as untimely. THIS ORDER WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL 11:59 P.M. ON 1/14/04, UNLESS THE JUDGE ORDERS OTHERWISE. PRO: 10 1" 2 8 “ 8 16 v 18 9 a 2 4 26 a Dated Aprt_-F_. 200. A A bese JUDGE/HEARING MASTER *Objections/Appeals are govemed by WDCR 24. You have ten (10) days forthe receipt ofthis Recommendation and Order within which o fle an objection or an appeal tothe District Court, Acknowledgement of Receipt of Order: DATE: DATE: ‘Applicant ‘Applicants Attomey DATE: DATE: ‘Adverse Party ‘Adverse Party's Attorney ao n 2 a “ 1s a6 7 ae as 20 a 2 2 Ey 2s 26 27 26 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I hereby certify that I am an employee of the Second Judicial District Court, and that on this day I deposited for mailing first class postage pre-paid at Reno, Nevada, sent by inter-office mail, or had picked up, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document addressed to: CHRISTOPHER REICHMAN 45 BISBY STREET RENO, NV 89512 TRACEY HILTON 2915 ANTELLA COURT SPARKS, NV 89434 ADVERSE PARTY'S MOTION AND ORDER. DATED: April 8, 2003. 2 2 Deputy Court Clerk IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE Case No. (WiZ- 0272 Dept. No. DM EX-PARTE MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT Extension of Order for Protection Modification of Order for Protection Dissolve the Order for Protection Order to Show Cause The above-named Applicant/Adverse Party, hereby moves the Court to grant th This motion is made for the following reasons: P jh rt it lobe us ee ea Def last-h a 2 2 4 6 26 a 28 State of Nevada ) County of Ws! 1 being first duly sworn, hereby state unde penalties of perjury that | have read this document and that the contents are true of m own personal knowledge. ( Dated:__HAR 2.6 2003 (Signatur L bl) (Street Address) AN GHz (City, State, Zip Code) (Daytime Telephone Number) (Evening/Message Telephone Number) \d'SWORN before me this deylof “, Mépcy _. 20.0%. ie AG CLERK ao n 2 a au“ as 16 wv 18 a 20 a 2 a Fa 2s 26 2 28 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I hereby certify that I am an employee of the Second Judicial District Court, and that on this day I deposited for mailing first class postage pre-paid at Reno, ‘Nevada, sent by inter-office mail, or had picked up, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Jdocument addressed to: CHRISTOPHER REICHMAN 45 BISBY STREET RENO, NV 89512 TRACEY HILTON 2915 ANTELLA COURT SPARKS, NV 89434 ADVERSE PARTY'S MOTION AND ORDER. DATED: April 8, 2003. LaL—— Deputy Court Clerk 10 " 2 3 “ 8 wv 18 19 a 23 24 25 6 a CODE 3370 IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE CHRISTOPHER REICHMAN, Applicant, Case No. CV02-02302 vs. Dept. No. DM TRACEY HILTON, Adverse Party. J ORDER ‘The Court having received the Adverse Party's motion to Dissolve filed on January 30, 2003, and/or having considered the filings, testimony and evidence presented at hearing, or having determined that no hearing is necessary, and having jurisdiction over the parties, the Court enters the following: Itis hereby ORDERED that the Extended Order for Protection Against Domestic Violence originally issued on, January 15, 2003, in the above entiled case shall remain in full force and effect. ‘The Adverse Party's Motion to Dissolve filed on January 30, 2003 is denied as untimely. THIS ORDER WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL 11:59 P.M. ON 14TH day of January, 2004, UNLESS THE JUDGE ORDERS OTHERWISE. PRO: 10 " 2 2 “ 6 16 a 8 9 a 8 2 25 B 28 ORDER TO THE WASHOE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENTILAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS/CONSTABLE (A) Any law enforcement officer who has probable cause to believe a violation of any provision of this Order has occurred is ordered to arrest the Adverse Party. Such party is to be charged with a misdemeanor VYotation ofthis Order in addition to any other criminal charges which may be justified. (8) Isuch law enforcement officer cannot verify that the Adverse Party was served with a copy of the Application and Order, the officer shall inform the Adverse Party ofthe specific terms of the Order, inform the | Adverse Party that he/she now has notice ofthe provisions of the Order and that a violation ofthe Order wil resi in histher atest, and inform the Adverse Party f the location of the Court that issued the Original order and the hours during which he/she can obtain a copy ofthe Order. The law enforcement officer shall then provide written ‘proof of notice to his agency and to the Court. von nocn [SFE _ ‘CAROL K COOKE, COURT MASTER *Objections/Appeals are govemed by WDCR 24. You have ten (10) days forthe receipt ofthis Recommendation and Order within which o file an objection or an appeal tothe District Court. ‘Acknowledgement of Receipt of Order: DATE: DATE: Roplicant Applicants Attomey DATE: DATE: ‘Adverse Party ‘Adverse Party's Atlomey PRO: 10 a a a “ as 16 uv as 20 a 2 23 Fy 28 26 27 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I hereby certify that I am an employee of the Second Judicial District Court, and that on this day I deposited for mailing first class postage pre-paid at Reno, ‘Nevada, sent by inter-office mail, or had picked up, a true and correct copy of the foregoing. document addressed to: CHRISTOPHER REICHMAN 45 BISBY STREET RENO, NV 89512 TRACEY HILTON 2915 ANTELLA COURT SPARKS, NV 89434 ADVERSE PARTY'S MOTION TO CONTEST AND ORDER. DATED: March 18, 2003. RGrd—___ Deputy Court Clerk e e az CODE 2496-6 70 IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THf STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE. ‘Applicant, case no. VOZDZ902 . Dept. No. DML ‘Adverse Party. EX PARTE MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT The above-named Applicant/Adverse Party, hereby moves the Court to grant the following relief: Extension of Order for Protection Modification of Order for Protection H Dissolve the Order for Protection Order to Show Cause State of Nevada) County of (dushoe_) 1 \Dipoe , being first duly sworn, hereby state under penalties of perjury that | have read this document and that the contents are true of my own personal n 12 | knowledse. B 14 | Dated: (Street Address) (City, State, Zip) (Daytime Telephone Number) {Evening/Message Telephone Number) (Looe SUBSCRIBED and SWORN bet 10 a a a ray as a6 vv as 20 a 22 23 4 25 26 2 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I hereby certify that I am an employee of the Second Judicial District Court, and that on this day I deposited for mailing first class postage pre-paid at Reno, /Nevada, sent by inter-office mail, or had picked up, a true and correct copy of the foregoing. document addressed to: CHRISTOPHER REICHMAN 45 BISBY STREET RENO, NV 89512 TRACEY HILTON 2915 ANTELLA COURT SPARKS, NV 89434 ADVERSE PARTY'S MOTION TO CONTEST AND ORDER. DATED: March 18, 2003. h a Deputy Court Clerk wera ne one 10 a 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 cove 2490 FILED EGAN WALKER, SBN 4408 Kreitlein & Walker, Assoc. 2003 JAN 14 PH 4: 35 555 S. Center St. Reno, Nevada 89501 RONALY IN. JR. (778) 323-3432 ttorney for TRACEY HILTON DEPUT IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE CHRISTOPHER SCOTT REICHMAN, Applicant, cua. vs. CASE NO. cR@#-02302 ITRACEY HILTON, DEPT. NO. DML Adverse Party. po MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL COMES Now EGAN WALKER, attorney for TRACEY HILTON, the defendant above-named and moves this Honorable Court to withdraw as attorney of record. This motion is based upon the attached points and authorities land all of the papers and pleadings on file with the Court to date. DATED this 14 day of January, 2003. oS EGAN WALKER Nevada Bar No. 4408 Kreitlein & Walker 555 S. Center St. Reno, Nevada 89501 (775) 323-3432 ae eve wera 10 1 12 23 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 POINTS AND AUTHORITIES SCR Rule 166 provides: 1, Except as stated in subsection 3, a lawyer shall not represent a client or, where representation has commenced, shall withdraw from the representation of a client if: (a) The representation will result in violation of the rules of professional conduct or other law; 2. Except. as stated in subsection 3, a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the client, or if: (a) The client persists in a course of action involving the lawyer’s services that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent; As the attached declaration of counsel reveals, representation lof TRACEY HILTON by the undersigned will, in this author’s opinion, result in violation of one or more rules of professional conduct. No remedy is available to counsel to cure the conflict which Inow exists while also preventing a violation of rules under which counsel practices. Therefore, counsel is compelled to withdraw and refrain from further appearance and/or representation involving the above-named defendant. CONCLUSION When faced with representation which, if continued, will result in a violation of the Supreme Court rules, counsel is required to withdraw. DATED this 14 day of January, 2002 EGAN WALKER wera weun 10 12 12 13 14 15 16 a7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DEK N I, EGAN WALKER do hereby state and declare that: 1. I am currently attorney of record for TRACEY HILTON in the Jabove-entitled matter; 2. As a result of my recent discussions with my client, I nave determined that my continued representation of TRACEY HILTON jould likely result in a violation of one or more of the Rules of Professional Conduct. 4. My representation of TRACEY HILTON will place me in an untenable position with regard to representing my client’s best interests while also keeping my professional conduct in conformance with all legal requirements placed upon me. 5. I have informed my client of the reasons for my ithdrawal. 6. This motion is made in good faith, not for the purpose of delay, and not because of any dispute with TRACEY HILTON involving y fees or payment for my services. DATED this 14" day of January, 2003./" io EGAN WALKER noe wears sway 10 1a 12 13 4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TEL EI Pursuant to NRCP 5(b), I hereby certify that on this date, I lserved a true and correct copy of the foregoing document by the following: K Deposit for mailing, in a sealed envelope, U.S. postage prepaid, at Reno, Nevada. Personal Delivery Facsimile laddressed as follows: Tan Silverberg, Esq. 96 Winter St. Reno, Nevada 89503 paren: this _' day of Jaswant, 2055 gan a Code FILED TAN E. SILVERBERG, ESQ. NEVADA BAR # 5501 : 96 Winter Street BO JANZ4 ANIC 16 Reno, Nevada 89503 (775) 786-5800 ee Attorney for Applicant CHRISTOPHER SCOTT REICHMAN DEPUTY IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE CHRISTOPHER SCOTT REICHMAN, Applicant, Case No. CV02-02302 vs. Dept. No. DMI TRACEY R. HILTON, Adverse Party. AFFIDAVIT OF PERSONAL SERVICE STATE OF NEVADA ) counry oF WASHOE =) I, Patrick J. Peregrin, do hereby swear under penalty of perjury, that the following assertions are true of my own personal knowledge: Your Affiant is, and was on the day when he served the within "EXTENDED PROTECTION ORDER AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one (21) years, and not a party to, nor interested in, the within matter; that the affiant personally served the same upon TRACEY R. HILTON, vid ytd 1] on this 2lstday of January 2] XX at her residence located at: 3 a] ___ at her place of employment: 5 6 7 8 9| suBscrIBED and SWORN to before me 10] this 23rd day of _January nw a2 Ki boah pen es “NoTaRy pusue 7 5S) ae PAMELA 15 ihn xen. 4, 2008 16 v7 18 19 20 a1 22 23 24 25 26 27 , 2003, at 6:20 p.m. 2915 Antella Ct. Sparks, NV 89434 Washoe County 1205 Mill Street NV 89502 Reno, Patricl ‘egrin Nevada Judifial’ Services Nv. Lic. #903 » 2003. 28 | cewpetiesiciients-Litigarion\REICMAN\elt of personal service wed 2 8 1“ 6 6 ” 8 9 20 a 2 2 2 B a 2 oor. CODE 1715 WB JAN 15 AID :33 RORALO SN. KONG HN, J sR tli TY IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE CHRISTOPHER SCOTT REICHMAN. , Applicant, Case No: CV02-02302 Dept. No: DM1 TRACEY RHILTON » Date Issued: 01/15/03 Adverse Party. | EXTENDED PROTECTION ORDER AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Date Expires: 01/14/04 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER 1S A CRIMINAL VIOLATION ‘and will result in a misdemeanor offense, unless @ more severe penalty is prescribed by law. I he violation is accompanied by 2 violent physical acl, sentence wil include incarceration of not less than five days nor more Fereparontts in the countyeily jal, $1,000.00 fine or a minimum of 200 hours communiy service, seanborsement of all costs, fees and medical expenses incurred; and participation in professional counseling YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that you CAN BE ARRESTED even ifthe person who oblained the ‘ORDER invites oF allows you to contact them. You have the sole responsibilty to avoid or refrain from violating the terms of this ORDER. Only the court can change the ORDER upon writen application. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that child stealing is felony offense, punishable by possible incarceration. this ORDER is in effect may constitute WARNING: Possession of a firearm or ammunition whi ‘ine of up to $250,000 andior a prison 2 felony under federal law punishable by a ‘Sentence of up to ten (10) years. Violence Against Women Act and is and Indian Nations...All other courts ‘This ORDER meets all Full Faith and Credit provisions o ‘enforceable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, U.S. Terrt enforce iter ith jurisdiction within the United States and all Indian Nations shall give full ftp 2 am it to this ORDER pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2268. Violation of the ORDER may subject you, We arcsec a tederal charges and punishment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 2261(a)(t) and (2) and 2262(0)(1) and (2). PRO: 36545 10 " 2 1% “ ry 16 ” 18 19 a 2 23 24 25 B 28 CODE 1715 IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE CHRISTOPHER SCOTT REICHMAN. Applicant, Case No: CV02-02302 vs. Dept. No: DM1 TRACEY R HILTON Adverse Party. ! Date Expires: 01/14/04 Date Issued: 01/15/03 EXTENDED PROTECTION ORDER AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ‘YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER IS A CRIMINAL VIOLATION ‘and will result in @ misdemeanor offense, unless a more severe penalty is prescribed by law. If the violation is ‘accompanied by a violent physical act, sentence wil include incarceration of not less than five days nor more than six montis in the countylcty jail $1,000.00 fine or a minimum of 200 hours community service: reimbursement ofall costs, fees and medical expenses incurred; and participation in professional counseling YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that you CAN BE ARRESTED even if the person who obtained the ORDER invites or allows you to contact them. You have the sole responsibilty 1o avoid or refrain from violating the terms ofthis ORDER. Only the court can change the ORDER upon written application, YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that child stealing is @ felony offense, punishable by possible incarceration. WARNING: Possession of a firearm or ammunition while this ORDER is in effect may constitute a felony under federal law punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 andlor a prison ‘sentence of up to ten (10) years. ‘This ORDER moets all Full Faith and Credit provisions of the Violence Against Women Act and is ‘enforceable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, U.S. Territories and indian Nations... All other courts {and law enforcement with jurisdiction within the United States and all Indian Nations shall give full faith ‘and credit to this ORDER pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2265. Violation of the ORDER may subject you, the ‘offender, to federal charges and punishment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 2261(a)(1) and (2) and 2262(a)(1) ‘and (2). 10 2 13 “ 6 16 7 9 a 2 24 a 28 The court having considered the filings, testimony and evidence presented at hearing, and the court having found that the Adverse Party received actual notice of hearing at which such person had an opportunity to participate, and the Adverse Party C1 was present [4] was not present, C1 was represented by counsel, NOT APPLICABLE , and the Applicant OX] was present El was represented by counsel, IAN SILVERBERG, and the Court having jurisdiction over the parties and this matter pursuant to NRS 33.010, et seq., and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court from specific facts shown that an act of domestic violence has occurred and/or you represent a credible threat to the physical safety of the above-named Applicant or minor child(ren), the court enters an extended ORDER and as a result ‘TO THE ADVERSE PARTY; YOU ARE PROHIBITED, either directly or through an agent, from threatening, physically injuring ‘or harassing the above-named Applicant and/or minor child(ren), and from selling, damaging, destroying, giving away, or otherwise disposing of, or tampering with, any property owned by the Applicant, or in which Applicant has an interest; YOU ARE PROHIBITED from any contact whatsoever with the Applicant, including but not limited to, in person, by telephone, through the mail, through electronic mail (e-mail), or through another person; 1 od YOU ARE EXCLUDED AND ORDERED to stay at least 100 yards away from ‘Applicants residence located at C] CONFIDENTIAL, or 8 45 BISBY RENO WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, or any other place that Applicant may reside. YOU shall not interfere with Applicant's Possession and use of residence, including utlties, phones, leases and other related residential services; 2. _N/A_ The Court, having jurisdiction under and meeting the requirements of Chapter 125A of the Nevada Revised Statutes (UCCJA), grants to Applicant temporary custody of the following minor child(ren) of the parties: ; YOU ARE PROHIBITED from interfering with Applicant's custody of the minor child(ren) named in this paragraph. It is in the best interest of the child(ren) that ‘no negative, insulting, or disparaging comments be made by one party against the other party in the PRO: 36545 10 " 2 3 “ 8 16 7 18 9 a 2 4 8 a 2B Presence ofthe minor child(ren); 3. NWA YOU ARE GRANTED visitation with the minor child(ren): , under the following terms and conditions: . 4. NIA YOU ARE ORDERED to pay support and maintenance ofthe minor chid(ren) as ‘set forth in the attached addendum. 5. _WA_ YOU ARE ORDERED to pay the rent or make payments on a mortgage on the ‘Applicant's place of residence or pay towards the support and maintenance of the Applicant, as follows: 6. _N/A_ Custody, visitation, and support of the minor child(ren) of the parties shall remain ‘as ordered in the Decree of Divorce/ORDER entered between the parties in case number , in the Court of the State of Nevads 7. 2

    You might also like