FRM/EDPD/539

CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL

CARIBBEAN ADVANCED PROFICIENCY EXAMINATION®

MODERATION FEEDBACK REPORT ON SCHOOL-BASED ASSESSMENT

BUILDING AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DRAWING UNIT 1 – OPTION B

Name of Centre: __________________________ Centre Code: ____________________
Name of Teacher: __________________________ Year of Examination: ____________________

ADMINISTRATION DETAILS COMPLIANCE WITH SYLLABUS GUIDELINES SPECIFIC COMMENTS

Yes No
Number of drawing portfolios requested: _________ Assignments tested the specific objectives in the syllabus. Yes No
Number of drawing portfolios received: _________
There were two assignments for each module in the portfolios. Sufficient portfolios were received
Portfolios were properly identified with
Assignment 4 was completed using CAD software. Assignments were completed
Mod 1 Mod 2 Mod 3
In each portfolio Assignment 4 was accompanied by a list
(i) Candidates’ Numbers There was sufficient information that
of commands, a complete drawing on A4 paper and an
Assignment 4 was CAD based
electronic copy of the completed drawing and commands.
(ii) Titles
The information about the design submitted
QUALITY OF CANDIDATES’ SUBMISSIONS
(iii) Name of Centre for Assignment 5 was adequate
Yes No
Yes No
Generally:
Drawings were neat and clean
Teacher’s marks were recorded on FRM/EDPD/393 OTHER COMMENTS

A completed Moderation Sample Form FRM/EDPD/391 Drawings had title blocks and border lines __________________________________________________
was submitted. __________________________________________________
Construction lines were shown where appropriate
APPROPRIATENESS OF ACTIVITIES __________________________________________________
Yes No The overall quality of the sample of projects submitted was
__________________________________________________
1. The assignments were relevant to the syllabus
objectives. Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory __________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
2. The assignments were appropriate for candidates
at this level. QUALITY OF TEACHER’S MARKING Yes No __________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
3. The portfolios submitted explored a variety of: 1. The CXC Mark Scheme was followed
__________________________________________________
(i) Skills/techniques
2. Marks were clearly shown for EACH of the criteria
(ii) Themes/topics __________________________________________________
set out in the marking guidelines
__________________________________________________
The teacher’s marking of the portfolio pieces was
__________________________________________________
Acceptable Severe Lenient Inconsistent __________________________________________________

Moderator’s Initials: ________________ Chief/Assistant Chief Examiner’s Initials: ________________ Examiner’s Initials: ________________ Date: ____________________________________
Revised September 2013