Standar Penilaian Pembelajaran S1 AET Tahun 2022 en-US

DOCUMENTS
INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM

(POLICIES, STANDARDS, MANUALS AND FORMS)
LEARNING
ASSESSMENT STANDARDS
AGROTECHNOLOGY STUDY
PROGRAM FACULTY OF
AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY OF
NORTH SUMATRA SEPTEMBER 2022
i
DOCUMENTS
INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM
(POLICIES, STANDARDS, MANUALS AND FORMS)
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STANDARDS,

MANUALS AND STANDARD FORMS
AGROTECHNOLOGY STUDY
PROGRAM FACULTY OF
AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY OF
NORTH SUMATRA SEPTEMBER 2022
ii
FOREWORD
Based on Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 19 of 2005 and the
National Higher Education Standards as outlined in the Regulation of the Minister of
Research, Technology and Higher Education No. 44 of 2015, Permendikbud No. 50 of 2014
which was later revoked and replaced by the Regulation of the Minister of Research,
Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia No. 62 of 2016 concerning
the Higher Education Quality Assurance System; then the quality of higher education at the
University of North Sumatra (USU) is the level of conformity between the implementation of
higher education and the National Higher Education Standards (SN Dikti) consisting of the
National Education Standards (SN Education): 62 of 2016 concerning the Higher Education
Quality Assurance System; then the quality of higher education at the University of North
Sumatra (USU) is the level of conformity between the implementation of higher education
with the National Higher Education Standards (SN Dikti) consisting of National Education
Standards (SN Education), National Research Standards (SN Research), National Community
Service Standards (SN PkM) and Higher Education Standards set by Higher Education
according to their respective needs and demands.
The Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) at USU aims to meet or exceed the National
Higher Education Standards (SN Dikti) as outlined in the Internal Quality Assurance System
Book published by Kemenristekdikti. According to Article 8 paragraph (4) letter b of
Permenristekdikti No. 62/2016, SPMI documents consist of: 62/2016, SPMI documents
consist of 4 (four) documents, namely: 1) SPMI policy document, 2) SPMI manual
document, 3) SPMI standard document, and 4) form document used in USU SPMI.
This SPMI Policy document is a book published by the USU Quality Management Unit, and
is one of the documents required by the government in the internal quality assurance of a
university. This USU SPMI Policy document underlies other documents, namely the SPMI
manual document, SPMI standard document and SPMI form document. This SPMI USU
policy document contains how USU conducts planning (P), implementation (P), evaluation
(E), control ( P ) , and quality improvement (P), in the implementation of higher education
tasks and functions. The SPMI standard document contains criteria, measures, benchmarks or
specifications of all higher education activities at USU to realize the vision and mission of
iii
USU. The SPMI manual document contains practical instructions on ways, steps,
iv
or procedures on how SPMI USU is implemented based on standards that have been set,
evaluated, and continuously improved. SPMI standard documents that contain standards,
indicators, and measures are planned, implemented, evaluated, controlled, and quality
improvement is carried out by all work units. SPMI form documents contain written
instruments and/or tables that function to record certain things or information or activities as
an integral part of SPMI standards and SPMI manuals.
With the publication of this SPMI policy document, other USU SPMI documents can be held
and developed in order to implement SPMI throughout the USU environment in stages. Our
gratitude goes to the team that has compiled and completed this SPMI policy book. We hope
that this book is able to inspire all parties in order to improve quality at USU in an integrated
and integrated manner, thus creating a driving force for efforts to develop the quality and
competitiveness of higher education.
Medan, September 2022

Head of Study Program,
Dr. Nini Rahmawati, SP, M.Si
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD................................................................................................................................................................III
CHAPTER I...................................................................................................................................................................1
INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY.....................................................................................1
SPMI POLICY RATIFICATION SHEET .................................................................................................................2

1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................3
1.1 Vision, Mission and Goals of USU ..............................................................................................................3
1.2 Vision, Mission and Goals of the USU Faculty of Agriculture .................................................................4
1.3.1 Vision, Mission of Agrotechnology Study Program.................................................................................5
1.3.3 Objectives of Agrotechnology Study Program.........................................................................................6
2. SCOPE ...................................................................................................................................................................6
1. PARTIES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT ..............................................................................7
2. GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND DEFINITIONS............................................................................................7
3. SPMI POLICY DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................................................7
4. USU SPMI STANDARD LIST ......................................................................................................................10
5. USU SPMI MANUAL LIST...........................................................................................................................14
6. REFERENCE .................................................................................................................................................14
CHAPTER II ...............................................................................................................................................................15
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STANDARD ...............................................................................................................15
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STANDARD RATIFICATION SHEET..................................................................16
1. DEFINITION..................................................................................................................................................17
2. RATIONALE..................................................................................................................................................17
3. LEARNING ASSESSMENT STANDARD STATEMENTERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.
4. REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................................................39
CHAPTER III..............................................................................................................................................................41
LEARNING ASSESSMENT MANUAL ...................................................................................................................41
LEARNING ASSESSMENT MANUAL ENDORSEMENT SHEET ....................................................................42
1. MANUAL PURPOSE.....................................................................................................................................43
1.1 Purpose of Manual for Setting Learning Assessment Standards.......................................................43
1.2 Purpose of the Learning Assessment Standards Implementation Manual ......................................43
1.3 Purpose of the Learning Assessment Standards Evaluation Manual...............................................43
1.4 Purpose of the Learning Assessment Standard Control Manual .....................................................43
1.5 Purpose of Improvement Manual for Learning Assessment Standards ..........................................43
2. SCOPE OF THE QUALITY MANUAL FOR LEARNING ASSESSMENT STANDARDS ...................43
3. DEFINITION OF TERMS ............................................................................................................................44
4. STEPS OR PROCEDURES...........................................................................................................................47
4.1 Manual for Setting (P) Learning Assessment Standards....................................................................47
4.2 Implementation Manual (P) Learning Assessment Standards ..........................................................48
4.3 Evaluation Manual (E) Learning Assessment Standard ....................................................................49
4.4 Manual for Control (P) of Learning Assessment Standards..............................................................50
4.5 Manual for Improvement (P) of Learning Assessment Standards....................................................51
5. QUALIFICATIONS OF OFFICIALS/OFFICERS WHO IMPLEMENT THE MANUAL ....................52
6. NOTE ..............................................................................................................................................................52
8. REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................................................52
vi
CHAPTER IV LEARNING ASSESSMENT FORM ...............................................................................................53
LEARNING ASSESSMENT FORM ENDORSEMENT SHEET ..........................................................................54
vii
CODE: K/SPMI-S1AET-USU
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH SUMATRA
DATE: September 2022
INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

SYSTEM POLICY PAGE: 1 of 50
CHAPTER I
INTERNAL
QUALITY
ASSURANCE
SYSTEM POLICY
1

SPMI POLICY RATIFICATION SHEET
PERSON IN CHARGE
PROCESS SIGNAT DATE
NAME JOB
URE
Nur Ulina
Warnisyah Head of GKM PS September
1. FORMULATION
Sebayang, SP, AET 2022
M.Agr
Dr. Nini Rahmawati, September
Head of
2. EXAMINATION SP, M.Si 2022
Study
Program PS
AET
Nur Ulina September
Warnisyah Head of GKM PS 2022
3. CONTROL
Sebayang, SP, AET FP USU
M.Agr
Dr. Lisnawita, SP, September
4. CONSENT WD 1 2022
M.Si
Dr. Ir. Tavi September
5. APPOINTMENT Dean of FP USU 2022
Supriana, MS
2

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Vision, Mission and Goals of USU
1.1.1 Vision
To become a university that has academic excellence as a barometer of scientific

progress that is able to compete in a global world level.
1.1.2 Mission
1. Organizing autonomy-based higher education which is a forum for developing
the character and professionalism of human resources based on empowerment
which contains the spirit of democratization of education that recognizes
plurality with an educational orientation that emphasizes aspects of finding
alternative solutions to actual problems based on scientific, moral, and
conscience studies;
2. Producing graduates who become agents of change as a force of modernization
in the life of the wider community, who have scientific competence, relevance
and strong competitiveness, and behave in ethical scholarship; and
3. Implementing, developing, and improving education, research culture and
community service programs in order to improve academic quality by
developing superior knowledge, which is beneficial for changing the lives of
the wider community for the better.
1.1.3 Destination
1. Producing qualified graduates who are able to develop science, technology,
humanities, and arts, based on religious morals, and able to compete at the
national and international levels;
2. Producing innovative research that encourages the development of science,
technology, humanities, and arts in national and international scope;
3

3. Producing community service based on reasoning and research work that is

useful in advancing the general welfare and intellectual life of the nation and
innovative community empowerment so that the community is able to solve
problems independently and sustainably;
4. Realizing adaptive, creative, and proactive independence from the demands of
society and development challenges, both nationally and internationally;
5. Continuously improve the quality of learning management to achieve
excellence in national and international competition and cooperation;
6. To be a moral and intellectual force in building an Indonesian civil society;
and
7. Developing the potential of students to become human beings who are faithful
and devoted to God Almighty and have noble character, healthy,
knowledgeable, capable, creative, independent, skilled, competent, and
cultured for the benefit of the nation.
1.2 Vision, Mission and Goals of the USU Faculty of Agriculture
1.2.1 Vision
To become a leading agricultural higher education institution in the

development of science, technology and human resources with the main
competencies of sustainable integrative plantations in a global order in 2025.
1.2.2 Mission
1. Organizing superior agricultural higher education that produces graduates

with STAR characters and gets international recognition.
2. Carry out and develop innovative applied agricultural research in the field of
TALENTA.
4

3. Providing expertise services in agriculture, especially sustainable integrative

plantations to support national food security.
1.2.3 Destination
1. Creating a quality academic atmosphere to produce graduates with STAR

character and become actors of change as a force for agricultural
modernization, especially plantations, who have scientific competence,
relevance and strong competitiveness with ethical intellectual behavior.
2. Producing innovative research in the field of TALENTA as part of USU's
excellence.
3. Producing services to the community in the form of research-based
community service activities in order to be able to solve problems in realizing
food self-sufficiency.
1.3 Vision, Mission and Objectives of the Agrotechnology Study Program FP USU
1.3.1 Vision
To become a study program that has excellence and is able to compete in the
global world order in 2020 in the development of science and technology of
sustainable plantation and horticultural crop cultivation.
1.3.2 Mission
1. Organizing an education program in the field of agroecotechnology which is

a forum for character development and professionalism, and is able to
develop itself in accordance with the development of science and technology
in agriculture, especially in the field of plantations.
2. Producing graduates who are able to compete globally, have an
entrepreneurial spirit and are able to develop themselves according to the
needs of the work environment, especially in the field of plantations.
5

3. Develop and improve research and community service, as well as a source of

consultation / information and reference for the industrial business world,
especially in the fields of plantation, agriculture and agro-industry.
1.3.3 Destination
1. Producing graduates who are reliable, resilient and creative, and able to
develop science and technology in the fields covered by agroecotechnology,
especially plantations.
2. Actively participate in the development of science and technology (research)
of plant cultivation to meet the needs of society.
3. Performing community service based on the results of innovative research
work to meet community needs, especially in the fields of agriculture and
smallholder plantations.
4. Expand the participation and potential of human resources in global
commitments in agriculture that support domestic agricultural development
policies.
5. Expand the participation and potential of human resources in global
commitments in agriculture that support domestic agricultural development
policies.
6. Build an information and technology center in the development of
entrepreneurship in agriculture that is environmentally sound and sustainable.
2. SCOPE
The USU SPMI policy covers all aspects of higher education implementation, with the
main focus on learning aspects and other aspects that support learning aspects. The focus
on the learning aspect is intended as an initial or pioneering step, because gradually the
focus of the scope of the USU SPMI policy will be developed so that it also covers non-
academic aspects, including aspects of welfare, cooperation, research and community
service.
6

1. PARTIES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT

The USU SPMI policy applies to all units at USU, namely study programs, departments,
faculties, bureaus, institutions, UPT, system centers and study centers.
2. GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

1. SPMI is an Internal Quality Assurance System that is planned, implemented,
evaluated, controlled, and improved by the University itself.
2. USU SPMI Policy is USU's thoughts, attitudes, and views regarding SPMI that apply
at USU.
3. The USU SPMI Manual is a document that contains practical instructions on how to
run and implement SPMI at USU.
3. SPMI POLICY DESCRIPTION

The entire USU academic community believes that SPMI USU aims to:
1. Ensure that every higher education service to students is carried out according to the
established USU SPMI Standards, so that if it is known that there are deviations from
the USU SPMI Standards, corrections will be made immediately;
2. Realizing transparency and public accountability, especially to parents/guardians of
students, regarding the implementation of higher education in accordance with the
established USU SPMI Standards;
3. Invite all parties within USU to work towards achieving goals based on USU SPMI
Standards and continuously strive to improve quality.
Management Model for USU SPMI implementation:

SPMI USU is designed, implemented, and continuously improved based on the PPEPP model
(establishment, implementation, implementation evaluation, implementation control, and
improvement) of SPMI USU Standards. With this management model, USU will first
determine the objectives to be achieved through appropriate strategies and a series of
activities. Then, the achievement of goals through these strategies and activities will always
be monitored regularly, evaluated, and developed in a better direction on an ongoing basis.
7

With the PPEPP management model, each unit within USU must periodically conduct a self-
evaluation process to assess the performance of its own unit using the established USU SPMI
Standards and Manuals. The results of the self-evaluation will be reported to the unit leader,
all staff in the unit concerned, and to the USU leadership. Based on the results of the self-
evaluation, unit leaders and USU leaders will decide on steps or actions that must be taken to
improve and enhance quality.
Implementing SPMI USU with the PPEPP management model also requires each unit in
USU to be open, cooperative, and ready to be audited or examined by a team of internal
auditors who have received special training on SPMI USU audits. Audits conducted at the
end of each academic year will be recorded and reported to the unit leaders and USU, and
then certain actions will be taken based on the findings and recommendations of the auditor
team.
All of the above processes are intended to ensure that every higher education activity at USU
is guaranteed quality, and that USU SPMI is always evaluated to find its strengths and
weaknesses so that changes can be made towards continuous improvement.
The result of the implementation of SPMI USU based on the PPEPP management model is
the readiness of all study programs in USU to follow the accreditation process or external
quality assurance either by BAN-PT or credible foreign accreditation agencies.
Principles in Implementing SPMI USU:
To achieve the objectives of SPMI USU mentioned above and also to realize the vision,
mission, and goals of USU, the academic community in implementing SPMI USU at every
level in USU is always guided by the principles:
1. Oriented to internal and external stakeholders;
2. Prioritize the truth;
3. Social responsibility;
4. Personnel competency development;
8

5. Participatory and collegial;

6. Method uniformity;
7. Innovation, learning and continuous improvement.
USU SPMI Strategy:

USU's strategies in implementing SPMI are:
1. Actively involving all academicians from the planning stage to the evaluation and
development stages of SPMI USU;
2. It also involves professional organizations, alumni, business world and government as
users of graduates, especially at the stage of determining USU SPMI Standards;
3. Conduct structured and planned training for lecturers and administrative staff on SPMI
USU, and specifically training as internal auditors;
4. Socialize the function and purpose of USU SPMI to stakeholders periodically.
Implementation of SPMI at the level of each unit and USU level:

USU has 6 faculties that manage 15 study programs, 5 university bureau-level work units, 3
institutions, and 4 study centers. The university stipulates that since 2013 all academic and
non-academic work units at every level must implement SPMI in every activity.
In order for the implementation of SPMI USU in all units and levels to run smoothly and be
coordinated effectively, for the first cycle of SPMI USU, namely from 2007 to 2018, USU
established a new work unit specifically tasked with preparing, planning, designing,
establishing, implementing, controlling, evaluating and developing SPMI USU.
9

4. LIST OF USU SPMI STANDARDS

1. Academic Standards
A. Graduate Competency Standards
1. Diploma Program Graduate Competency Standards
2. Graduate Competency Standards for Undergraduate Programs
3. Professional Program Graduate Competency Standards
4. Competency Standards for Graduates of the Master's Program
5. Specialist Program Graduate Competency Standards
6. Competency Standards for Doctoral Program Graduates
B. Learning Content Standards

1. Diploma program learning content standards
2. Undergraduate program learning content standards
3. Professional program learning content standards
4. Master program learning content standards
5. Specialist program learning content standards
6. Doctoral program learning content standards
C. Learning Process Standard

1. Learning characteristics standard
2. Learning process planning standards
3. Student learning load standard
4. Standard semester learning plan (RPS) for academic education
5. Practicum Standard
6. Field practice standard
7. Internship standard
D. Learning Assessment Standard

1. Diploma program learning assessment standards
2. Undergraduate program learning assessment standards
3. Professional program learning assessment standards
4. Master's program learning assessment standards
10

5. Specialist program learning assessment standards

6. Doctoral program learning assessment standards
E. Lecturer Standard
1. Academic qualification standards
2. Competency Standards
3. Workload standard
F. Learning Management Standard

1. Academic atmosphere standards
2. Standards for freedom of academic speech
G. Learning Financing Standards;

1. Investment cost standard
2. Standard operating costs
H. Research Standards
1. Research outcome standards
2. Research process standards
3. Research content standards
4. Research assessment standards
5. Researcher standards
6. Research facilities and infrastructure standards
7. Research management standards
8. Research funding and financing standards
I. Community Service Standards

1. Community service outcome standards
2. Community service process standards
3. Community service content standards
4. Community service assessment standards
11

5. Standard for implementing community service

6. Community service facilities and infrastructure standards
7. Community service management standards
2. Non-Academic Standards
A. Management Standard
B. Financial Standards
C. Staffing Standards:
1. Recruitment standards
2. Trial period standard
3. standard employment agreement
4. work performance assessment standard
5. Promotion standards, transfer standards and demotion standards
6. Standard working time
7. Standard working time for overtime and leave
8. Earning and reward standards
9. Social security and welfare standards
10. Development and coaching standards
11. Occupational safety and health standards
12. Discipline standard
13. Standard official travel
14. Standard for termination of employment
D. Infrastructure Standard:
1. Standard Classroom
2. Library standards
3. Laboratory standards
4. Studio standard
5. Standard Workstation
6. Production unit standard
7. Sports standard
12

8. Art space standards

9. Student room standards
10. Leader room standard
11. Lecturer room standard
12. Administration room standard
13. Land standard
14. Toilet Standard
15. Public facility standards: Road standard, Electricity standard, Voice and
data communication standard, Water standard,
16. Environmental standards
E. Standard Facilities
1. Furniture standard
2. Education equipment standard
3. Learning media standards
4. Book standards
5. Infocomm standard
6. Experimental instrument standard
7. Standard consumables
8. Maintenance, hygiene and safety standards
9. Standards for students with special needs.
F. Student and Residential Standards:

1. Selection standard
2. Registration standard
3. Matriculation Standard
4. Campus introduction standard
5. Standards for student activities
6. Academic, sporting and artistic achievement standards
7. Standards for intra-student organizations
8. Aluminum standard
13

9. Student service standards
G. Cooperation Standard;
1. Domestic Cooperation Standard
2. Overseas Cooperation Standard
H. Planning and development standards

1. Planning Standards
2. Development Standards
I. Academic Event Standards (judicium, graduation, inauguration of professors, Anniversary)
J. Safety and order standards
5. USU SPMI MANUAL LIST

1. USU SPMI Standard Setting Manual
2. USU SPMI Standard Implementation Manual
3. SPMI Standard Evaluation Manual
4. USU SPMI Standard Implementation Control Manual
5. USU SPMI Standard Improvement Manual
6. REFERENCES
1. Law No. 14 of 2005 on Teachers and Lecturers
2. Law No. 12 of 2012 on Higher Education;
3. Permenristekdikti No. 44 of 2015 concerning SN Dikti
4. Permenristekdikti No. 62/2016 on SPMI PT
5. Permenristekdikti No. 32/2016 on PS and PT Accreditation
14
CODE: S/Dik-4.1/SPMI-S1AET-
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH SUMATRA USU
LEARNING REVISION: 01
ASSESSMENT PAGE: 15 of 50
STANDARDS
CHAPTER
II
ASSESSME
NT
STANDARD
S
LEARNING
15
STANDARDS
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STANDARD RATIFICATION SHEET
PERSON IN CHARGE
PROCESS SIGNAT DATE
NAME JOB
URE
Nur Ulina
1. FORMULATION
M.Agr
Head of
Study
Program PS
AET
Nur Ulina September
3. CONTROL
M.Agr
M.Si
Supriana, MS
16
STANDARDS
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STANDARDS
1. DEFINITION
In the University of North Sumatra Learning Assessment System Standard, various terms
are defined that apply to all work units:
a. Educative, is the principle of assessment carried out by the University of North
Sumatra to motivate students to be able and continue to strive a). improve planning
and learning methods; and b). achieve maximum graduate learning outcomes.
b. Authentic, is the principle of assessment carried out by the University of North
Sumatra which is oriented towards the continuous learning process and learning
outcomes that reflect the ability of students during the learning process.
c. Objective, is the principle of assessment carried out by the University of North
Sumatra which is based on standards agreed between lecturers and students and is
free from the influence of the subjectivity of the assessor and the assessed. The
Objective Principle is intended to ensure the purity and fairness of student
assessment and grades.
d. Accountable, is the principle of assessment carried out by the University of North
Sumatra in accordance with fixed, standardized and clear procedures and criteria,
agreed at the beginning of the lecture, and understood by students. This procedure
includes procedures for submitting grades, grade input procedures, grade publication
procedures and others in accordance with existing SOPs.
e. Transparency, is the principle of assessment conducted by the University of North
Sumatra whose procedures and assessment results can be accessed by all
stakeholders. The principle of transparency is carried out by using various
appropriate methods/media that can be maximally utilized by stakeholders.
2. RATIONALE
The rationality of t h e formation and establishment of Learning Assessment Standards at
the University of North Sumatra is based on:
17
STANDARDS
• Permenristekdikti no: 44 of 2015 concerning National Higher Education Standards
(SNPT) provides direction on the importance of continuous quality improvement.
The preparation of Learning Assessment standards is important in quality
improvement efforts as a reference in preparing, organizing, and evaluating the
learning process.
• Learning Assessment Standards are needed so that the assessment process is
objective, fair and thorough. Learning Assessment that is objective and covers the
necessary aspects is expected to contribute to improving the quality of learning.
Therefore, standards are needed that include benchmarks, principles, criteria for the
same learning assessment that must be carried out throughout the work unit-
Universitas Sumatera Utara in a sustainable and integrated manner.
18
CODE: S/Dik-4.1/SPMI-S1AET-USU
STANDARDS
3. STANDARD STATEMENTS, STRATEGIES, INDICATORS, AND LEARNING ASSESSMENT
STANDARD DOCUMENTS
1. STATEMENTSTANDA R
2. STRATEGY 3. INDICATOR 4. DOCUMENTS
1. The head of the study program Develop a University Guidebook for 1. A regulation was issued 1. Regulations revised
ensures the implementation of the Assessment of Learning Processes and that contains 6 Academic Regulations;
assessment of the process and student Outcomes that includes: (i) assessment components of 2. Guidelines Process
learning outcomes that include: principles, (ii) assessment techniques, assessment of learning Assessment and
a. assessment principles; (iii) assessment mechanisms and processes and University Learning
b. assessment techniques and procedures, (iv) implementation of outcomes; Outcomes;
instruments; assessment, (v) reporting of assessment 2. Availability 3. Guidelines
c. mechanism and results, and (vi) student graduation in Guid Acade
assessment accordance with SNPT / and or SNPK. elines for Assessment of mic Information System
procedures; Learning Processes and (AIS).
d. implementation of the assessment; Outcomes;
e. assessment reporting; and 3. Implementation of
f. student graduation. synchronization
In accordance with the assessment regulatio
procedure which consists of the planning ns in the Academic
stage, the activity of giving assignments Information System
or questions, observing performance, (AIS).
returning the results of observations, and
giving final grades which can be done
through a phased assessment.
19
STANDARDS
and/or reassessment.
2. Chair program study ensure 1. Evaluate and revise 1. Curriculum and 1. Curriculum and SSP;
20
STANDARDS
Implementation of assessment curriculum and RPS on a regular basis; Revised RPS; 2. Assessment Rubric;
guidelines for the process and results 2. Design an assessment rubric 2. Available 3. Monitoring and
of student learning in order to fulfill according to the learning method; assess Evaluation Report.
Graduate Learning Outcomes (ELOs) 3. Develop monitoring and evaluation ment rubric;
with educational, authentic, objective, instruments; 3. Available M&E
accountable, and transparent 4. Carry out monev on the instrument;
principles carried out in an integrated implementation of the assessment of 4. Implemented
manner. the process and student learning monitoring and
outcomes evaluation of the
suitability of assessment
implementationprocess
and
student learning
outcomes to measure
the achievement of
learning
outcomes based on
assessment
principles
which
includes:
21
STANDARDS
educative,
authentic,
objective,
accountable,
and
transparent which
conducted in an
integrated manner.
3. Chair program study ensure 1. Carry out training and 1. all lecturers 1. UPP report;
already
22
STANDARDS
implementation of techniques and refresher on the application of attend training and 2. RPS and lecture
instruments for assessing mastery of assessment techniques and refreshments; minutes;
knowledge, general skills and specific instruments; 2. Available evidence 3. Monitoring and
skills in the fulfillment of ELOs 2. Develop rubric guides, portfolios, and that evaluation report;
carried out by choosing one or a observation techniques; demonstrates the 4. Final assessment list.
combination of various assessment 3. Conduct monitoring and evaluation of appropriateness of the
techniques and instruments. the suitability of assessment technique and
a. Assessment techniques consist of: techniques and instruments for assessment
observation, participation, learning achievement; instruments to the
performance, written tests, oral 4. Lecturers determine the final results achievement of learning
tests and questionnaires; of the assessment through a meeting of all
b. The assessment instrument consists of course lecturers (team teaching); courses;
of: 5. Lecturers carry out regulations on the 3. Available instrument
i. rubric as an instrument for final results of the assessment which monev technical
assessing the learning process; is an integration between the various suitability and
ii. portfolio or design work as an assessment techniques and assessment
instrument for assessing learning instruments used. instruments to
outcomes; learning achievement;
iii. observation technique for 4. The weight of the final
assessment of student attitude results of the course
mastery assessment includes:
The final assessment result is an a. Minimum 20%
23
STANDARDS
integration of assignment
between various techniques and b. Maximum quizzes
instruments
24
STANDARDS
assessment used. 10%

c. Practicum/skills lab
maximum 35%
d. Tutorial maximum
15%
e. Exam
midter
m maximum 40%
f. Final semester exam
maximum 50%
g. End of block exam
50% maximum
4. The head of the study program requires Develop, deliver, and agree on the Related rules available 1. Academic Regulations
lecturers in the PS to compile, submit, stages, techniques, instruments, criteria, that contain mechanisms
agree on the stages, techniques, indicators, and assessment weights related to assessment;
instruments, criteria, indicators, and between the assessor and the assessed in 2. Minutes of the
assessment weights between the accordance with the lesson plan. assessment;
assessor and the assessed in 3. Final Grade Assessment
accordance with the plan. List (DPNA).
learning.
25
STANDARDS
5. Program Chair study Implement mechanism Available assessment 1. Academic Regulations
programrequires lecturers in the study assessment mechanism implementation mechanism that contain mechanisms
program to carry out the in accordance with stages, techniques, that related to assessment;
instruments,
26
STANDARDS
assessment in accordance with stages, criteria, indicators, and assessment contains elements as 2. Minutes of the
techniques, instruments, criteria, weights that contain assessment follows: assessment;
indicators, and assessment weights principles. 1. have an assessment plan 3. Final Grade Assessment
that contain assessment principles. contract in the RPS, List (DPNA).
2. carry out assessments 4. Report
according to lecture monito
contract, ring and evaluation of the
3. provide feedback to
suitability of the
students,
4. have documentation implementation of the
assessme assessment in
nt of student learning accordance with the
processes and outcomes, elements that have been
5. has a procedure that determined in SN Dikti.
includes the planning
stage, the activity of
giving assignments or
questions, observing
performance, returning
results
Observation, and
final grading,
6. assessment reporting
27
STANDARDS
in the form of
qualificati
ons of student success in
taking a course in the
form of letters and
numbers,
7. have evidence of
improvement
assessme
nt based on the results
of monev.
(LAMSAMA,
LAMTEKNIK,BAN
PT)
LAMSAMA:
8. The quality of the exam
questions is very good
and very much in line
with the SLOs that have
been developed.
9. Student assignments are
very good and very
much in line with the
ELOs that have been
developed.
28
STANDARDS
10. The final project is very
good and in accordance
with the ELOs that have
been compiled.
11. Student skills are very
29
STANDARDS
complete, supported
with
practi
cum module, and
required by
users both now and in
the future.
LAMTEKNIK:
12.
Avai
lability of
basi
c sciences and math
courses ≥ 25 credits.
13. Implementation of
capstone design that
has: 1. Guide
implementation 2.
Have
formulat
ion of course learning
outcomes 3.
Using engineering
standards and realistic
constraints based on
30
STANDARDS
on
knowledge and
31
STANDARDS
skills that have been

acquired in previous
lectures. 4.
Have valid evidence of
implementation.
LAMINFOKOM:
Evidence of mechanism
implementation
proces
s
completion task
final/thesis/dissertation
32
STANDARDS
6. The head of the study program ensures 1. document the assessment of the 1. There is a response 1. Final assessment list;
that students have the opportunity to process and results of student learning from the lecturer 2. Course contract;
question the results of the in an accountable and transparent regarding questions that 3. KHS.
learning assessment. manner 1 week after the exam arise from students
schedule. lecturers are required to about the assessment of
enter grades in SIA in accordance learning outcomes and
with the academic calendar; students can understand
2. Provide an opportunity for students to it;
question the results of the learning 2. Available
assessment no later than 1 week after evidence of
the determination. implementation
time limit for documenting evid
ence of assessment of 7
elements, namely:
a. have a contract
assessment plan,
33
STANDARDS
Assessment. b. carry out assessments

accor
ding to
contract or
agreement,
c. provide
feedback and
provide
opportunities
to question the
results to
students,
d. have documentation
of assessment of
learning processes
and outcomes
e. has a procedure that
includes
the planning stage,
the activity of giving
tasks or questions,
observation of
34
STANDARDS
performance,
return of results
35
STANDARDS
Observation, and
providing final
grade,
f. reporting
assessmen
t in the form of
qualificati
on of student success
in
take a course in the
form of letters and
numbers,
g. have evidence of
plans and have
carried out
repair process
based on the results
of the monev
assessment.
36
STANDARDS
7. The head of the study program requires 1. Establish rules/manuals for 1. Implementation of all 1. Manual
lecturers in the PS to carry out assessment implementation assessments in assessm
assessments in accordance with the procedures; accordance with the ent implementation
RPS carried out 2. Implement monev to rules/manual procedures procedures;
by the lecturer or lecturer team ensure implementation implementation of the 2. Monitoring and
assessment assessment. evaluation report
37
STANDARDS
guardian and may conducted in accordance with the RPS. 2. Available instrument
include relevant monev suitability
stakeholders. implementation
assessme
nt in accordance with
the RPS
38
STANDARDS
8. The head of the study program 1. Develop a procedure manual for All courses have followed 1. Procedure manual;
requires lecturers in the PS to assessing student success the manual of assessment 2. List of course grades;
implement assessment rules in the qualifications in taking a course; procedures 3. Monitoring and
form of qualifications for student 2. Carry out monitoring and evaluation qualificati evaluation report
success in taking a course which is of assessment suitability on of student success in
expressed in a range: taking a course
a. letter A is equivalent to the
number 4 (four) with a weight
interval greater than or equal to
80 (eighty), categorized as very
good;
b. letter B+ is equivalent to 3.5 (three
point five) with a weight interval
greater than or equal to 75
(seventy five) and smaller than 80
(eight
30), which is a good category;
39
STANDARDS
c. letter B is equivalent to the

number 3 (three) with a weight
interval greater than or equal to 70
(seventy) and smaller than 75
(seventy-five), categorized as
good;
d. letter C+ is equivalent to 2.5 (two
point five) with a weight interval
greater than or equal to 65 (sixty-
five) and smaller than 70
(seventy), categorized as
sufficient;
e. letter C is equivalent to the
number 2 (two) with a weight
interval greater than or equal to
60 (sixty) and less than 65 (sixty-
five), categorized as sufficient;
f. letter D is equivalent to number 1
(one) with weight intervals greater
than or equal to 50 (five)
40
STANDARDS
60) and smaller than 60 (sixty),

categorized as less; or
g. the letter E is equivalent to the
number 0 (zero) with a weight
interval smaller than 50 ( fifty),
is categorized as very poor.
9. The head of the study program ensures 1. Inform PS lecturers about the 1. There are guidelines for 1. KHS;
that the results of the assessment are obligation and sanction of submission lecturers that contain 2. Grade transcript.
announced to students no later than 2 time results obligations and
(two) weeks after one stage of learning assessment sanctions regarding
learning in accordance with the results; time
learning plan. The results of the 2. Issuing KHS with social studies and submission
assessment in each semester are stated GPA scores lear
with the Semester Achievement Index 3. Issuing transcripts of students who ning assessment results;
(IPS) and the results of the assessment have completed their studies with 2. KHS is available;
at the end of the study program are GPA 3. Grade transcripts are
stated with the Achievement Index. available.
Cumulative Grade Point Average
(GPA).
41
STANDARDS
10. Chair Program Study Program 1. Evaluate study success on 1. Available evaluation 1. Study period evaluation
Chair ensure semester 2, 4 and 6 to see the success instrument; report;
students are declared to have graduated of the study according to the 2. No available student 2. Book guidance
if they have taken the entire learning regulations
load
42
STANDARDS
and have graduate learning outcomes applicable. Drop Out (DO) academic
targeted by the study program with a 2. Ensure the role of
cumulative grade point average (GPA) academic advisor
greater than or equal to 2.00 (two (PA)
point zero).
zero).
11. The head of the study program Implementing regulations regarding There is evidence that 1. Transcript;
ensures the implementation of student predicates and graduation criteria shows the predicate of 2. Graduation book
regulations regarding student in accordance with applicable regulations graduation in accordance
predicates and graduation criteria as with the regulations
follows:
a. pass with
satisfactory predicate
if it reaches a cumulative grade
point average (GPA) of 2.76 (two
point seven six) to 3.00 (three
point zero zero);
b. graduates with a very satisfying
predicate if they achieve a
cumulative grade point average
(GPA) of 3.01 (three point zero
one) up to
43
STANDARDS
with 3.50 (three point five zero);
44
STANDARDS
or
c. pass with honors if they achieve a
(GPA) of more than 3.50 (three
point zero) and pass with
scheduled study period.
12. The head of the study program Evaluate the success of studies in 1. Available evaluation 1. Study period evaluation
determines that students are declared semesters 1, 2, and 3 to see the success of instrument; report;
to have graduated if they have taken studies in accordance with applicable 2. No available student 2. Book academic
the entire specified learning load and regulations. Drop Out (DO) guidance
have the graduate learning outcomes
targeted by the study program with a
cumulative grade point average (GPA)
greater than or equal to 3.00 (three
point zero).
zero).
13. The head of the study program Implementing regulations regarding There is evidence that 1. Transcript;
determines the predicate and criteria student predicates and graduation criteria shows the predicate of 2. Graduation book
for graduating students from in accordance with applicable regulations graduation in accordance
professional programs, specialist with the regulations
programs, master's programs, applied
master's programs, and
45
STANDARDS
doctoral program as follows:
46
STANDARDS
a. graduates with a satisfactory

(GPA) of 3.00 (three point zero
zero) to 3.50 (three point five
zero);
b. graduates with a very satisfying
(GPA) of 3.51 (three point five
one) to 3.75 (three point seven
five); or;
c. pass with honors if you achieve a
(GPA) of more than 3.75 (three
point seven five), with additional
rules according to academic
regulations for master's programs.
and doctorate.
14. The head of the study program ensures Verifying the correctness of student data All data has 1. Certificate;
the right who pass includes data been verified 2. Professional certificate;
student who declared diplomas, professional 3. Certificate of
47
STANDARDS
passed obtained: certificates, competency certificates, competency;
48
STANDARDS
a. diploma, and SKPI 4. SKPI

b. degree; and
c. letter certificate certificate
(SKPI).
15. The head of the study program The MBKM that has been established 1. The organization of 1. Rector's Decree on the
together with the Deputy Dean runs according to plan and is monitored MBKM activities from Implementation of
implements the MBKM Implementing and evaluated and followed up well. planning and MBKM at USU;
Organization. implementation very 2. M&E report on MBKM
well. activities on a regular
2. There is a unit in the basis.
institution or faculty
that manages these
activities and ensure
the activity run
smoothly.
3. Activities
MBKM is reviewed
reviewed
periodically
with very good from
aspects
of planning,
implementation,
analysis, and
49
STANDARDS
plan
its improvement/follow-
up.
50
STANDARDS
(LAMSAMA)
16. The head of the study program Running guide recognition 1. The availability of 1. Implementation
recognizes the implementation of courses in the MBKM implementation guidelines and number of
MBKM into courses according to the program. guidelines and the credits; MBKM;
available curriculum structure. number of MBKM 2. Guidelines for course
credits provided by recognition in the MBKM
UPPS and PS; program;
2. Availability of course 3. Report MBKM
recognition guidelines implementation activities
in the MBKM at PS or UPPS;
program; 4. Report monev
3. There are ≥ 25% of of MBKM
students in the TS who implementation at
participat PS/UPPS level.
e in activities MBKM
with a minimum of 20
credits (LAMTEKNIK)
4. There are 7-8 draft
forms
activitie
s
conversion program
MBKM the
implemented by
program
stud
y program
51
STANDARDS
(LAMSAMA)
5. The existence of
document
monev suitability
About
Competen
cy equivalency
Graduate
52
STANDARDS
obtained from the
educational process
held outside the study
program at the
University or at other
universities in
accordance with with
competencies of
graduates in their study
program.
17. The head of the study program makes The head of the study program together Each MBKM-based 1. Guidelines for course
an MBKM-based learning outcome with the Deputy Dean makes a strategy learning activity is recognition in the
assessment strategy for assessing MBKM-based learning complemented by an MBKM program;
outcomes and ensures that the excellent assessment 2. Report MBKM
competence of graduates in students who strategy. implementation activities
take part in the educational process held at PS or UPPS;
outside the study program at USU or at 3. Report monev
other universities (MBKM) has the same of MBKM
equivalence as competence. implementation at
graduates in their study program. PS/UPPS level.
18. The head of the study program The head of the study program together Scientific activities that are Report
together with the Deputy Dean with the Deputy Dean carry out scientific scheduled and carried out implementa
implements programs and activities activities such as: public lectures, stadium periodically every month. tion of scientific activities in
outside of structured learning generale, scientific seminars and or book (LAMSAMA, PS or UPPS every month
activities to improve the academic reviews and other scheduled scientific LAMTEKNIK, BAN PT)
atmosphere on a regular basis. activities.
and carried out periodically every month.
53
STANDARDS
54
CODE: S/Dik-4.1/SPMI-AET-
DATE: August 07, 2019
ASSESSMENT PAGE: 55of 50
STANDARDS
4. REFERENCES
1. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National
Education System (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2003 Number
78, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4301);
2. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 Year 2005 on Teachers and Lecturers
(State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2005 Number 157, Supplement to
State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4586);
3. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 Year 2012 on Higher Education (State
Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2012 Number 158, Supplement to State
Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5336);
4. Government Regulation Number 4 of 2014 concerning the Implementation of
Higher Education and Management of Higher Education (State Gazette of the
Republic of Indonesia Year 2014 Number 16, Supplement to State Gazette of the
Republic of Indonesia Number 5510);
5. Government Regulation Number 16 of 2014 concerning the Statute of the University
of North Sumatra (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 42,
Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5510);
6. Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2012 concerning
the Indonesian National Qualifications Framework (State Gazette of the Republic of
Indonesia Year 2012 Number 24);
7. Regulation of the Minister of National Education Number 17 of 2010 concerning
Prevention and Control of Plagiarism in Higher Education;
8. Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture Number 81 of 2014 concerning
diplomas, Certificates of Competence, and Certificates of Higher Education
Profession;
9. Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia
Number 3 of 2020 concerning National Higher Education Standards;
10. Decree of the Director General of Higher Education of the Ministry of National
Education of the Republic of Indonesia Number 163/DIKTI/Kep/2007 concerning
the Arrangement and Codification of Study Programs at Higher Education;
11. Decree of the Director General of Higher Education of the Ministry of National
55
STANDARDS
Education of the Republic of Indonesia No. 80/DIKTI/Kep/2007 on the
Arrangement and Determination of
56
STANDARDS
Return of Permit to Operate Study Program at the University of North Sumatra in
Medan;
12. Regulation of the Board of Trustees of the University of North Sumatra Number 11
of 2015 concerning Procedures for the Formation of Regulations within the
University of North Sumatra.
13. Decree of the Board of Trustees of the University of North Sumatra Number
1/SK/MWA/I/2016 on the Appointment of the Rector of the University of North
Sumatra for the Period 2016-2021;
14. Decree of the Board of Trustees of the University of North Sumatra Number
3/SK/MWA/III/2016 on the Appointment of the Vice Rector of the University of
North Sumatra for the 2016-2021 Period;
15. Directorate General of Learning and Student Affairs. 2019. Guidelines for the
Preparation of Higher Education Curriculum in the Industrial Era 4.0. Kemenristek
Dikti;
16. University of North Sumatra Strategy Plan 2020-2024.
57
CODE: M/Dik-4.1/SPMI-S1AET-
MANUAL
CHAPTER
III
ASSESSME
NT
MANUAL
LEARNING
58
MANUAL
LEARNING ASSESSMENT MANUAL ENDORSEMENT SHEET
PERSON IN CHARGE
PROCESS SIGNAT DATE
NAME JOB
URE
Nur Ulina
1. FORMULATION
M.Agr
Head of
Study
Program PS
AET
Nur Ulina September
3. CONTROL
M.Agr
M.Si
Supriana, MS
59
MANUAL
LEARNING ASSESSMENT MANUAL
1. MANUAL PURPOSE
1.1 Purpose of Manual for Setting Learning Assessment Standards
As a guideline in designing, formulating, and establishing Learning Assessment
Standards in order to fulfill the learning outcomes of graduates in all educational
programs at the University of North Sumatra;
1.2 Purpose of the Implementation Manual for Learning Assessment Standards

1. To fulfill the Learning Assessment Standards at the University of North Sumatra
2. To implement Learning Assessment Standards at the University of North Sumatra
1.3 Purpose of the Learning Assessment Standards Evaluation Manual

To evaluate the implementation of Learning Assessment Standards so that the
implementation of Learning Assessment Standards can be controlled.
1.4 Purpose of the Learning Assessment Standard Control Manual
To control the implementation of learning assessment standards so that learning assessment
standards can be achieved/fulfilled.
1.5 Purpose of the Improvement Manual for Learning Assessment Standards

To improve the Learning Assessment Standards on an ongoing basis at the end of
each Learning Assessment Standards cycle.
3. SCOPE OF THE QUALITY MANUAL FOR LEARNING

ASSESSMENT STANDARDS
Scope This Quality Manual for Learning Assessment Standards applies:
a. When the Learning Assessment Standards were first to be drafted, formulated and
established;
60
MANUAL
b. For the Higher Education Curriculum (KPT) in all Education Programs at the
University of North Sumatra which includes Learning Assessment Standards;
c. When the Learning Assessment Standard is implemented in educational activities
by all Education Programs at the University of North Sumatra;
d. When the Learning Assessment Standard is evaluated (monitored, supervised,
checked) its achievement on an ongoing basis;
e. When the evaluation results show the need for control in the form of correction so
that better Learning Assessment Standards can be met;
f. When the Learning Assessment Standards implementation cycle ends, the
Learning Assessment Standards are improved for the next cycle.
4. DEFINITION OF TERMS
• Learning Assessment Standards are the minimum criteria / conditions that must be
achieved by students in the learning process to get a value rating in passing a
course they are legally enrolled in;
• The Indonesian National Qualifications Framework (KKNI) is a competency
qualification framework that can juxtapose, equalize and integrate between fields
of education and fields of vocational training and work experience in order to
provide recognition of work competencies in accordance with the structure of
work in various sectors;
• Learning Assessment Outcomes are the value ratings obtained by students through
the internalization of knowledge, attitudes, skills, competencies and accumulated
work experience that refers to the competency standards of higher education
graduates.
• Designing standards is the thought process to produce standards about what is
needed in SPMI.
• Formulating standards is writing each Assessment into a complete statement
using the Audience, Behavior, Competence and Degree (ABCD) or KPI formula;
61
MANUAL
• Setting Standards is an act of approval and ratification of Learning Assessment
Standards, so that Learning Assessment Standards are declared valid;
• A tracer study is a tracking study conducted through a track record evaluation at
the Academic Directorate;
• Public Test is a test to obtain input that can be conducted through an online
survey to relevant stakeholders;
• Evaluation is measuring a process or an activity to know whether the process or
activity is carried out in accordance with the SPMI Assessment Standards;
• Examination is checking or auditing in detail all aspects of t h e implementation
of higher education assessment carried out periodically, to match whether all the
implementation of higher education assessment has been running in accordance
with the SPMI Assessment Standards;
• Implementing Standards is a measure, specification, benchmark, as stated in the
standard statement must be obeyed, done, fulfilled its achievement;
• A manual is a description of a sequence of steps to accomplish something written
in a systematic, chronological, logical, and coherent manner;
• A Work Instruction is a detailed list of tasks to be performed by the assignee;
• Control is to take corrective action on the implementation of the Learning
Assessment Standards so that deviations / failures to fulfill the Learning
Assessment Standards can be corrected;
• Corrective action is taking corrective action so that the achievement/failure to
meet the Learning Assessment Standard can be met by the Standard Appraisal
implementer;
• Lecturers are professional educators and scientists with the main task of
transforming, developing, and disseminating knowledge,
62
MANUAL
technology, and art through education, research, and community service.
63
MANUAL
4. STEPS OR PROCEDURES
4.1 Manual for Setting (P) Learning Assessment Standards
DEAN VICE DEAN I PRODI
Start
Studying Doc. Competency Standards;

academic regulations, Permenristek
Dikti No. 44 of 2015, Permenristek Dikti
No. 62 of 2016, decisions of
professional associations and study
programs.
Developing Learning Assessment

policy materials
Prepare the
Organizing the formulation of learning
formulation of assessment
Establish and enforce
academic field
Learning Assessment
policies related
Standards through
to learning
Rector Decree Formulate academic
assessment
standards policies related to
Finish
64
MANUAL
4.2 Implementation Manual (P) Learning Assessment Standards
VICE DEAN I GJM PRODI/GKM
Start
Laws and regulations,

agreements of study
program associations,
professional
associations
Doing
evaluatio
n preparation and
analysis of competency
assessment
graduates any
Create document
written Procedure
Implementation of
Assessment Standards for
all levels of education
Socialize Learning
carry out activities to
Assessment Standards to
implement the
study program managers,
Learning assessment
all lecturers, education
Standard as a
personnel periodically and
benchmark for
consistently.
achievement
Finish
65
MANUAL
4.3 Evaluation Manual (E) Learning Assessment Standard
WAREK 1 FACULTY STUDY PROGRAM
Start
Conduct periodic measurements

every semester on the
achievement of Assessment
Standards
Recording or recording all findings in the

form of deviations, omissions, errors, or
the like from implementation that are not
in accordance with the Learning
Assessment Standards
Record some results in the form of

documents containing records of
Learning Assessment Standards
Examine & study reasons/causes for

deviations from standards, or where
Learning Assessment Standards fail
Receive the Learning Make a report on the Make periodic written reports on all
Assessment results of measuring measurement results to the Dean.
Standards Evaluation the achievement of
report and study it Learning Assessment
further. Standards to Warek 1
Finish
66
MANUAL
4.4 Manual for Control (P) of Learning Assessment Standards
WAREK 1/UMM FACULTY/GJM PRODI/UNIT/GKM
Start
Examining the achievement

of the Learning Process
Standards and looking for
reasons and causes of
deviation or failure to
achieve the Learning Process
Standards.
Decided
correcti Recapitulate corrective
ve action for actions to be taken and
Implement
recommended to the implemented by the
correcti
Faculty to any Department and or Study
ve action
deviation / failure to achieve Program
the Learning Process
Standards
Reporting results Make a written report

Receive
Control regarding the control of the
Learni
Learnin Learning Process Standards
ng Process Standard
g Process Standards to the Learni
control report
Vice Rector 1 ng Process Standards
Finish
67
MANUAL
4.5 Manual for Improvement (P) of Learning Assessment Standards
WAREK 1/UMM FACULTY/GJM PRODI/GKM
Start
Study report
Results controlling
standard by faculty
Organize meetings to Organize

Provide
discuss recommendations content revision meeting
Learning revisi
revision Standard with
Standards on
standard invite all
Recommenda proces
content with lecturer
tions s
invite all
program to
study programs
Establish revised content Submit a revised draft

of the new Learning Content Standard Proces
Process Standard Learning s
Learni to
faculty to be determined
ng Process Standards in
accordance with
stakeholder requests
Finish
68
MANUAL
5. QUALIFICATIONS OFFICIAL/OFFICER
WHO EXECUTING THE
MANUAL
(P) (P) (E) (P) (P)
Determinati Implementatio Evaluatio Control Improved
on n n
Rector √
Representat
√ √
ive
Rector I
Dean √
Head of √
Department
Head of √
Department
6. NOTE
To complete this manual, it requires the availability of written documents in the form of:
1. List of laws and regulations in the field of higher education or related;
2. Availability of the regulations mentioned in point 1 above.
3. Questionnaires for tracking studies or for surveys
4. Learning Assessment Standard Form.
5. Work procedure or SOP
6. Work instruction
7. Procedures for Controlling the Implementation of Learning Assessment Standards.
8. Learning Assessment Standard Implementation Control Form.
9. Learning Assessment Standard Implementation Control Result Form.
10. Learning Assessment Standard Report Document.
7. REFERENCES
1. Indonesian Law No. 12/2012 on Higher Education
2. Presidential Regulation No. 8 of 2012 concerning KKNI
3. Government Regulation No. 16 of 2014 concerning USU Statutes
4. Permenristek Dikti No. 44 of 2015 concerning SNDIKTI
69
MANUAL
5. USU Rector Decree Number 03 of 2017 concerning USU academic regulations
6. USU Strategic Plan (Renstra) 2015-2019
70
CODE: F/Dik-4.1/SPMI-
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH SUMATRA S1AET-USU
FORM
CHAPTER IV
LEARNING
ASSESSMENT
FORM
71
FORM
LEARNING ASSESSMENT FORM ENDORSEMENT SHEET
PERSON IN CHARGE
PROCESS SIGNAT DATE
NAME JOB
URE
Nur Ulina
1. FORMULATION
M.Agr
Head of
Study
Program PS
AET
Nur Ulina September
3. CONTROL
M.Agr
M.Si
Supriana, MS
72
FORM
EXAMPLE 1:
SUBMISSION OF COURSE GRADES FOR STUDY PROGRAMS USU
T.A. 2020/2021
NO SUBJECT COURSE GRADE TT LECTURERS

COORDINATO SUBMISSION WHO
R TIME SUBMITTED
1
5 Dst
MEDAN.....2020
WADEK 1
(...............)
73
FORM
EXAMPLE
2:
STUDY PROGRAM COURSE GRADE INPUT PROCESS USU
T.A. 2020/2021
NO SUBJECT COURSE INPUT TT

COORDINATO PROCE LECTURERS
R SSING / STAFF
TIME IMPLEMEN
TING INPUT
1
5 Dst
MEDAN.....2020
WADEK 1
(...............)
74
FORM
EXAMPLE
3:
STUDENT COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE VALUE OF STUDY PROGRAM COURSES

USU
T.A. 2020/2021
NO SUBJE COOR KOMPLEN CO VALU ABOUT

CT D. NAME / RECEI TOLA MPLE E LECTUR
SUBJEC NIM VE K N AFTE ERS
T MHS YG A VALU R WHO
KOMPLEN E IMPR IMPROV
OVEM E
ENT GRADES
1 1.
2
3
4
5 Dst
MEDAN. ....2020
WADEK 1
(...............)
75
FORM
EXAMPLE
4:
SUBMISSION OF COURSE GRADES FOR STUDY PROGRAMS USU

OUTSIDE THE SUBMISSION DEADLINE
T.A. 2020/2021
REASON NUMBE TT LECTURERS

NO SUBJE MK FOR DELAY R OF WHO SUBMIT
CT COORDIN DAYS OF OUTSIDE THE
ATOR AM- DEADLINE
BATAN
DELAY
1 1.
5 Dst
MEDAN. ....2020
WADEK 1
(...............)
76
FORM
EXAMPLE
5:
CONCLUSION OF SURVEY ON OBJECTIVITY OF COURSE

ASSESSMENT OF STUDY PROGRAM USU ACCORDING TO
STUDENTS T.A. 2020/2021
REASONS FOR
SUBJE MK LESS
NO OBJECTIV NOT BEING
CT COORDIN OBJECTIV
E OBJECTIVE
ATOR E
1
5 Dst
MEDAN. ....2020
WADEK 1
(...............)
77
FORM
EXAMPLE
6:
CONCLUSION OF SURVEY ON TRANSPARENCY OF COURSE

ASSESSMENT OF STUDY PROGRAM USU ACCORDING TO
STUDENTS T.A. 2020/2021
REASONS
NO SUBJE MK TRANSPA LACK OF FOR LACK OF
CT COORDIN RAN TRANSPAREN TRANSPAREN
ATOR CY CY
1
5 Dst
MEDAN. ....2020
WADEK 1
(...............)
78
FORM
EXAMPLE
7:
CONCLUSION OF THE SURVEY ON THE CONDITION OF THE

RANGE OF COURSE ASSESSMENT WEIGHTS IN THE S2 STUDY
PROGRAM USU STUDY PROGRAM
ACCORDING TO STUDENTS
T.A. 2020/2021
UNREA REASONS
FAIR
SUBJE MK SONAB FOR LACK OF
NO WEIGH
CT COORDIN LE TRANSPAREN
T
ATOR WEIGH CY
RANGE
T
RANGE
1
5 Dst
MEDAN. ....2020
WADEK 1
(...............)
79

Standar Penilaian Pembelajaran S1 AET Tahun 2022 en-US

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Standar Penilaian Pembelajaran S1 AET Tahun 2022 en-US

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DOCUMENTS

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM

LEARNING ASSESSMENT STANDARDS,

Medan, September 2022

Dr. Nini Rahmawati, SP, M.Si

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY.....................................................................................1

SPMI POLICY RATIFICATION SHEET .................................................................................................................2

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

SPMI POLICY RATIFICATION SHEET

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM POLICY

To become a university that has academic excellence as a barometer of scientific

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

3. Producing community service based on reasoning and research work that is

To become a leading agricultural higher education institution in the

1. Organizing superior agricultural higher education that produces graduates

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

3. Providing expertise services in agriculture, especially sustainable integrative

1. Creating a quality academic atmosphere to produce graduates with STAR

1. Organizing an education program in the field of agroecotechnology which is

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

3. Develop and improve research and community service, as well as a source of

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

1. PARTIES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT

2. GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

3. SPMI POLICY DESCRIPTION

Management Model for USU SPMI implementation:

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

5. Participatory and collegial;

USU SPMI Strategy:

Implementation of SPMI at the level of each unit and USU level:

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

4. LIST OF USU SPMI STANDARDS

B. Learning Content Standards

C. Learning Process Standard

D. Learning Assessment Standard

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

5. Specialist program learning assessment standards

F. Learning Management Standard

G. Learning Financing Standards;

I. Community Service Standards

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

5. Standard for implementing community service

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

8. Art space standards

F. Student and Residential Standards:

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REVISION: 01

9. Student service standards

H. Planning and development standards

I. Academic Event Standards (judicium, graduation, inauguration of professors, Anniversary)

J. Safety and order standards

5. USU SPMI MANUAL LIST

LEARNING ASSESSMENT STANDARD RATIFICATION SHEET

assessment used. 10%

skills that have been

Assessment. b. carry out assessments

c. letter B is equivalent to the

60) and smaller than 60 (sixty),

a. graduates with a satisfactory

a. diploma, and SKPI 4. SKPI

LEARNING ASSESSMENT MANUAL ENDORSEMENT SHEET