In comic “A day at the park”, a one-eyed alien creature embarks on a philosophically-
oriented debate with another bulkier and older one. While sharing a park bench, One-Eye admits that he collects questions, whereas the second creature is a collector of answers. One-Eye argues that questioning is fundamental and does not lose value.In contrast, answers tend to not correspond to the reality with the passage of time. The answer collector states that it is undeniable the fact that questions dictate answers. By extension, we can argue that it is in human consciousness and innate process to raise questions with the aim to be gradually answered. As a result, we can approach the absurd concept of truth and therefore gain knowledge. Inevitably, One-Eye admits that he, in fact, collects answers because they do mate with questions. However, he elaborates further his initial view regarding the significance of questions over answers. He purports that nothing can improve an invalid answer, whereas a misplaced question can result in more critical reasoning and therefore to a plausible question. Furthermore, One-Eye alleges that questions cause genuine inquiry into big ideas and generally produce more content. When a question is answered, we come to a conclusion –failed or meaningful– that inevitably stops the inquiry and the learning process. We can examine briefly why questions seem to be more significant than answers. Questions foster our opened mindedness as we move beyond our instincts and thus spark a deeper level of thinking. Answers, on the other hand, are responses that can be weakened over time. As our perception of things evolves, subsequently our arguments and values with which our answers have been built do not remain unchanged. To make it more comprehendible, we will not get the same answer if we asked a middle-aged person and an adolescent. Answers are influenced by our surroundings, social standards and norms, and other factors that have a great effect on how we approach the world. Even our genes and biological features determine the way we interpret things. Also, we live in a world full of bias and dozens of stimuli, each having some impact on our perception. We deduce that answers rely upon individual traits and other conditions, we come to live in. Thus, it is a challenge to come up with an objective answer as we do not conceive things identically. In fact, an answer can sometimes defy basic human logic. On the other hand, questions are usually products of the curiosity any human being who wants to explore in depth the human nature and critically question it. A mankind not driven by curiosity to doubt its surroundings is prone to fail and stagnate. When we question, we reevaluate our overall corpus of knowledge. Whereas, the endeavor for finding an answer derives from the innate human desire for certainty. To conclude, on a superficial level we suppose that in order to approach truth, we have to find an answer, however, that answer usually does not endure over time, becomes obsolete and dilutes. Thus, we diverge from the concept of truth instead of approaching it.
Learn To Think Using Thought Experiments: How to Expand Your Mental Horizons, Understand Metacognition, Improve Your Curiosity, and Think Like a Philosopher