Carlos Sanchez

Argument Why do you think that this argument will be

effective in convincing readers of your position?

EXAMPLE

Premises:
1. The federal government has a
responsibility to protect its citizens
from foreign threats
2. Tik Tok is owned by China, which is
the US’ top geopolitical rival
3. Tik Tok steals personal data from its
users

Conclusion: Therefore, the US should pass a

federal law banning tik tok

Premises: Yes, I believe that this argument will be

1. It is the government's duty to maintain
law and order inside the United States.
2. The states have the right to decide
whether or not to pass and enforce
strict gun laws.
3. Strict gun laws have been associated
with a decrease in violence, crime,
suicides, homicides, and mass
shootings.
4. More lenient gun laws have been
associated with a higher percentage of
violence, crime, suicides, homicides,
and mass shootings.
Conclusion: All states in the United States
should consider stricter gun law legislation.
Premises:
1. The government must address the
needs of the people. Therefore, that is
why there should be programs aimed
at helping the community.
2. The government should address all the
gun violence in this country.
3. A lot of the gun violence and crime in
this country could be fixed if the
government passes strict gun laws
whilst also have programs directed to
effective in convincing readers of my position.
The reason I believe my argument will be
convincing is because it mentions the effects
correlated with strict gun laws. The premises
mention the decrease in violence, crime,
suicides, homicides, and mass shootings. All
people want there to be less violence, so when
I show that strict gun laws impact violence it
will strengthen my argument.
Yes, I believe that my argument will be
effective in convincing readers of my position.
I feel that all the evidence and the explanation
of the results will make my argument so much
more convincing. Especially where I explain
and analysis the evidence. The premises makes
the connection between the community-
building programs and strict gun laws.
 helping the less fortunate people.
4. The less fortunate communities
experience the most amount of
violence and crime.

Conclusion: Community-building programs

and stricter gun laws when promoted in
conjunction with one another help to reduce
gun violence whilst improving the lives of
people within a community.
Premises: Yes, I believe that my argument will be
1. The government must address all the effective in convincing readers of my position.
violence that is happening in this I feel that I have strong premises, and these
country. premises will help me further prove my point.
2. The government must address all the All the evidence these premises have will
crime that is happening in this country. definitely help in making a convincing
3. Strict gun laws are a way to deal with argument. The premises show how strict gun
violence and crime. laws can be an effective way of dealing with
4. The government has to pay close gun violence.
attention to the laws they currently
have and the laws they are thinking of
passing.
5. Strict gun laws can make it harder for
criminals to commit a crime.

Conclusion: Strict gun laws are an effective

way of dealing with violence and crime.
Premises:

Conclusion: