Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Secs Module 2
Secs Module 2
Learning outcomes
Explain the concept of teacher beliefs including their types and impacts on
teaching and learning process.
Write a reflection note on changing teacher beliefs
Teaching Role: Divergent beliefs about teaching roles result in varied instructional
Description: Level 1 teachers primarily focus on student differences, attributing learning outcomes to
inherent characteristics.
Assessment: Assessment practices are often quantitative, measuring correctness or using arbitrary
scales, potentially overlooking deeper understanding.
Curriculum: Views the curriculum as a checklist of covered content, missing the opportunity to
address student comprehension and engagement.
1. Provide examples of how differing beliefs about students can shape teaching approaches
and influence student outcomes.
3. Discuss how a focus on blaming the student may affect assessment practices and hinder
opportunities for reflective teaching.
4. Analyse the role of teacher beliefs in shaping instructional strategies and assessment
practices.
Description: At Level 2, teachers shift their focus to what they do in the classroom. This view
still involves transmission but emphasises transmitting complex concepts and understandings
rather than mere information.
Learning Perspective: Learning is perceived as a result of the teacher’s actions rather than
solely dependent on student characteristics.
Teaching Skills: Teachers at Level 2 strive to develop a range of teaching skills beyond
traditional methods, acknowledging the need for more than basic lecturing.
Staff Development: Traditional approaches to staff development often emphasise what the
teacher does, focusing on teaching skills.
Management vs. Facilitation: While management skills are crucial, Level 2 recognises that
effective teaching is not just about managing the classroom but facilitating learning.
Prescriptive Advice: Common advice includes establishing clear rules, ensuring clarity in
communication, and maintaining eye contact – all essential for effective teaching.
Deficit Model: Level 2 is considered a deficit model, with emphasis placed on the teacher’s
competencies. However, this model may not fully capture teaching effectiveness.
Deficit Model Critique: The deficit model places blame on the teacher, often used by
administrators for personnel decisions. However, possessing teaching competencies does not
guarantee teaching effectiveness.
Skill Deployment: The focus should be on the effectiveness of skill deployment rather than
the skill itself, considering its impact on student learning.
Reflective Teaching: Level 2 teachers should engage in reflective practices, questioning not
only what they do but also why, when, and how to ensure desired effects on student learning.
1. Examine the shift from Level 1 to Level 2 teaching, focusing on the evolution of the teacher's role
from information transmission to the transmission of complex concepts and understandings. Discuss
the implications of this shift on teaching practices and student learning outcomes.
2. Critically analyse the deficit model in Level 2 teaching, where the blame may be placed on the
teacher’s competencies.
4. Explore the idea that the focus should not solely be on possessing teaching skills but on how and
why these skills are deployed. How does this perspective contribute to a more comprehensive
understanding of effective teaching practices?
Learning Emphasis: In Level 3, the emphasis is on the student’s actions, and the
effectiveness of teaching is measured by the achievement of intended outcomes.
Expert Teaching: Mastery of teaching techniques is crucial, but their relevance lies in
whether learning occurs.
Transformation from Previous Levels: Unlike Levels 1 and 2, Level 3 requires clarity on
what students are to learn, the intended outcomes, and the specific activities needed for
understanding.
Defining Understanding Levels: Clear stipulation of the level of understanding students are
expected to achieve is essential in Level 3 teaching.
Key Questions: Teachers need to address critical questions, including defining levels of
understanding as outcome statements, determining student actions required for specified
levels, and establishing methods to assess the intended outcomes.
Student-Centred Approach: The key shift is from what the teacher does to what students
do, marking a move towards a more student-centred theory of teaching.
Importance of Learning Activities: The focus on students doing the work underscores that
teaching effectiveness is measured by the success of learning activities rather than the
teacher's actions.
Holistic Approach: Level 3 teaching adopts a holistic approach, focusing on the alignment
of teaching practices with intended learning outcomes and the success of student
understanding.
2. Examine the significance of specifying learning outcomes in Level 3 teaching. How does this
contribute to a more focused and goal-oriented approach, and what challenges might arise in
defining and achieving these outcomes?
3. Discuss the departure from Levels 1 and 2 models in Level 3 teaching, particularly in terms of the
emphasis on student actions.
4. How does this shift influence teaching practices, and what implications does it have for measuring
teaching effectiveness?
Impact on Classroom Atmosphere: The choice between these approaches influences the
classroom atmosphere and the quality of relationships between teachers and students.
Overview: Teacher beliefs about students and the learning process shape the classroom
climate, influencing the emotional, social, and academic atmosphere.
Negative Beliefs: Negative beliefs can create a detrimental climate, leading to disheartened
and disengaged students, as well as potential behavioural issues.
1. Examine the role of teacher beliefs in shaping instructional methods, particularly in the choice
between authoritarian and student-centred approaches. Discuss the implications of these approaches
on classroom dynamics, student engagement, and the overall learning experience.
2. Analyse how positive beliefs can inspire a growth mindset and a sense of self-efficacy, while
negative beliefs may contribute to disengagement and diminished confidence.
3. Discuss the impact of teacher-student interactions on the classroom atmosphere, considering the
differences between authoritarian and student-centred approaches.
5. Discuss how positive beliefs contribute to a cooperative and inclusive environment, emphasizing
teamwork and diversity celebration, while negative beliefs may unintentionally foster competition or
exclusion.
Changing teacher beliefs poses several challenges, primarily due to their deep-rooted
nature and resistance to change.
Time and Resource Constraints: Teachers may resist change due to a perceived
lack of time and resources, feeling overwhelmed by job demands.
Mentorship: Seek guidance from mentors or coaches who can offer support and
direction in the journey to change teaching beliefs, providing valuable insights and
experience.
1. Examine the challenges associated with changing teacher beliefs. Discuss strategies to
overcome these challenges and promote a positive shift in teacher perspectives.
4. Explore how research involvement contributes to the evolution of beliefs about classroom
practices.
5. Evaluate how mentorship enhances teachers' ability to navigate challenges and embrace
new perspectives in teaching.