Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Be Aware. Do Better.
Grow More.
R e p o rt P re p a re d F o r:
Tanmaykumar Patel
April 18, 2024
Individual and Team Performance Lab
Department of Psychology
The University of Calgary
OV E R V I E W
T h e P e e r F e e d b a c k R e p o rt
Team members provided anonymous feedback on 5 team member compe-
tencies that are associated with team effectiveness. This report summarizes
your team members’ feedback regarding these competencies, allowing you
to gain a stronger sense of your strengths and areas for development. The
final page of the report offers a framework for discussing the Peer
Feedback assessment within your team.
5 K e y T e a m w o r k C o m p e t e n c ie s
C o m m i t m e n t : commitment to the team’s work
Communication: communicating with team members
Capabilities: having a strong foundation of knowledge, skills and abilities
S t a n d a r d s : emphasizing high standards
F o c u s : keeping the team on track
Peer Rating C o m m it m e n t :
Commitment
5 4.3 Strong
Self Rating
4
This dimension is about your
3
commitment to the team’s
2 work.
Standards 1 Communication
Communication:
4.7 Outstanding
Capabilities:
The above graph presents you with a bird’s-eye view of
4.7 Outstanding
your peer feedback results. Each corner of the pentagon
represents one of the 5 teamwork competencies. Lower This dimension is about
scores are points that fall closer to the center of the graph and having a strong foundation of
higher scores are associated with points that extend knowledge, skills, and
toward the edge of the graph. For example, if you scored 5 abilities needed by the team.
on apabilities, that point would stretch to the outer
edge of the graph.
When the yellow line extends past the blue line for any
F o c u s:
4.7 Outstanding
competency, this is a Blind Spot, meaning you rated
yourself higher than your peers rated you on that
This dimension is about
competency. When the blue line extends past the yellow
keeping the team on track.
line, this is also a Blind S p o t , but in this case your peers
rated you higher than you rated yourself on that
competency. Your score on each competency is displayed
along the right-hand side of this page. S ta n d a rd s:
4.3 Strong
4.5 to 5.0 = Outstanding
3.5 to 4.5 = Strong This dimension is about
2 .5 to 3 .5 = M o d e r a te emphasizing high standards.
1.5 to 2.5 = Bare Minimum
1.0 to 1.5 = Unsatisfactory
C o m m it m e n t t o t h e T e a m ’s W o r k
This teamwork competency is related to your peers' perceptions of your commitment
and contributions to the team’s work. Some examples of these behaviours include:
Write one specific, actionable, and measurable development goal to work toward that
will help you improve or maintain your score on this teamwork competency.
GOAL
© Copyright 2024 itpmetrics.com - Page 4
C OM M U N I C AT I ON
Write one specific, actionable, and measurable development goal to work toward that
will help you improve or maintain your score on this teamwork competency.
GOAL
© Copyright 2024 itpmetrics.com - Page 5
CAPABILITIES
apabilities
This teamwork competency is related to your peers' perceptions of your ability to be
able to accomplish outstanding work. Some examples of these behaviours include:
• eeks to gain the kno ledge skills and abilities needed by the team.
• Learns about other teammates’ tasks and roles.
• emonstrates the capabilities needed for the team to perform.
Write one specific, actionable, and measurable development goal to work toward that
will help you improve or maintain your score on this teamwork competency.
GOAL
© Copyright 2024 itpmetrics.com - Page 6
F OC U S
ocus
This teamwork competency is related to your peers' perceptions of your ability to keep
the team on track and focused on goal accomplishment. Some examples of these
behaviours include:
• Monitors issues that may affect the team and notices problems.
• rovides meaningful gro th oriented and regular feedback to members.
• Helps the team plan and organize work, and anticipates issues.
Write one specific, actionable, and measurable development goal to work toward that
will help you improve or maintain your score on this teamwork competency.
GOAL
© Copyright 2024 itpmetrics.com - Page 7
S T AN D AR D S
Write one specific, actionable, and measurable development goal to work toward
that will help you improve or maintain your score on this teamwork competency.
GOAL
© Copyright 2024 itpmetrics.com - Page 8
PEER FEEDBACK
"Appreciate your effort, more initiative would enhance team performance even further."
This is an opportunity for team members to reflect on their teamwork competencies. Team
debriefs are a valuable development opportunity because team members who set goals for
behaviour change and vocalize their commitments to the team are more likely to take action on
them. The following sections will offer a framework for successfully facilitating the debrief.
Before beginning the team debrief discussion, all team members should review their feedback
and record their development goals for each of the 5 teamwork behaviours. Make sure that all
team members bring their report to the meeting for quick reference.
Remember that peer feedback reports are designed to be anonymous and private. Team
members are NOT required to show their scores or any written comments. Each team member
will share only what they are comfortable sharing with the team.
The debrief is most effective when discussions are future-oriented, focusing on forward-looking
agreements with minimal discussion of problems occurring in the past.
Development goals should be as specific, actionable, and quantifiable as possible. After each
member presents their development goal, the team should offer strategies to support that
member toward goal accomplishment.
Choose one member of the team to facilitate the debrief. The facilitator´s role will be to keep the
1 conversation on track and make sure that the guidelines outlined above are being followed. Have
the facilitator read the Purpose and Guidelines to the team at the beginning of the meeting.
Ask each team member to share one personal strength that emerged from their feedback report.
2 Identify how each individual can leverage their strengths to enhance the team’s overall
performance. Have someone record each team members’ strength in the space provided below.
Team members recorded one development goal for each of the 5 teamwork competencies on
3
their individual reports. Now each member should select one or two of these goals to become
their primary development objective. Have someone record each team member’s commitment
in the space provided below.
4
Wrap up the session by summarizing themes involving the team’s overall strengths and
development areas, and record the themes in the space provided below.
THEMES
Strengths Development Ot h e r s
The peer feedback assessment at ITPmetrics.com adapts work from Dr. Ohland (e.g., Ohland et
al., 2012) and recommended practices for measurement. As described in a reliability and
validity study published by O’Neill et al. (2019), ITPmetrics.com builds on and adapts
dimensions provided by Ohland et al. (2012), which are the following (adapted terms used in
ITPmetrics in parentheses):
Given that the five dimensions of team member effectiveness were identified through rigorous
work by Dr. Ohland and colleagues, a variation of those dimensions was used in the
ITPmetrics.com platform with naming revisions as well as adjustments to the description of the
dimensions to ensure to the best of our judgment that they resonated with students, the
rating form was user-friendly and easy to use, and the feedback report was rich and
comprehensive in supporting the user’s development.
We wish to highlight some of the outstanding work that preceded us by Dr. Ohland and
colleagues (see https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=qnDbTpYAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra for Dr.
Ohland’s other many contributions on the subject, as well as his faculty page
https://engineering.purdue.edu/ENE/People/profile?resource_id=22358). Some of Ohland et
al.’s foundational published work can be read in these articles:
Ohland, M. W., Loughry, M. L., Woehr, D. J., Bullard, L. G., Felder, R. M., Finelli, C. J., ... &
Schmucker, D. G. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness:
Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self-and peer evaluation. Academy of
Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 609-630.
Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. W., & DeWayne Moore, D. (2007). Development of a theory-based
assessment of team member effectiveness. Educational and psychological measurement,
67(3), 505-524.
More details on the revisions made by Dr. O’Neill for ITPmetrics.com is available in the article
below or by contacting him directly: toneill@ucalgary.ca
O’Neill, T., Larson, N., Smith, J., Donia, M., Deng, C., Rosehart, W., & Brennan, R. (2019).
Introducing a scalable peer feedback system for learning teams. Assessment & Evaluation in
Higher Education, 44(6), 848-862.