Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Available at www.sciencedirect.com
Shao-Hua Xie a, Ignatius Tak-Sun Yu a, Lap-Ah Tse a,⇑, Oscar Wai-kong Mang b, Li Yue c
a
School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
b
Hong Kong Cancer Registry, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China
c
Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Toronto, ON, Canada
⇑ Corresponding author: Address: School of Public Health, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR, China. Tel.: +86 852
22528791; fax: +86 852 21457489.
E-mail address: shelly@cuhk.edu.hk (L.-A. Tse).
0959-8049/$ - see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.004
S.-H. Xie et al. / European Journal of Cancer 49 (2013) 150–155 151
Table 1
Distribution of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in different age groups,
stratified by sex, in Hong Kong during the period 1983–2008.
Age groups Male Female Male to
a b a b female ratio
No. IR No. IR
10–14 12 0.2 6 0.1 1.9
15–19 65 1.1 25 0.4 2.4
20–24 147 2.3 118 1.8 1.3
25–29 527 7.7 264 3.5 2.2
30–34 1162 16.2 615 7.8 2.1
35–39 2221 31.4 951 12.6 2.5
40–44 2923 44.8 1087 16.6 2.7
45–49 2999 52.7 1014 18.9 2.8
50–54 2853 60.2 857 19.8 3.0
55–59 2315 58.9 666 18.8 3.1
60–64 1849 56.5 607 20.0 2.8
Fig. 2. Male to female ratios in smoking prevalence and the incidence
65–69 1378 49.4 527 18.9 2.6
rate of nasopharyngeal carcinoma over time in Hong Kong, 1983–
70–74 898 42.2 366 15.4 2.7
2008.
75–79 435 32.3 221 12.6 2.6
80–84 196 29.1 118 10.6 2.7
85+ 61 16.6 65 7.2 2.3
All ages 20060 25.0c 7519 9.3c 2.7
21.8d 8.1d 2.7
a
Number of cases.
b
Incidence rate (1/100,000 person-years).
c
Crude incidence rate (1/100,000 person-years).
d
Age-standardised incidence rate using World Health Organisation
(WHO) World Standard Population 2000 as the reference (1/100,000
person-years).
ages than that of the non-keratinising carcinoma because they are generally more common in men than
(Fig. 3). women and decrease after ages 55–59 years, the normal
Results of the curve fitting analysis which described retirement ages. However, occupational exposures may
the age-specific incidence rates of NPC by sex using only explain a small proportion because exposures to
non-linear regressions are shown in Fig. 4. The ages at specific carcinogens are generally rare in the population.
which the age-incidence curve rose above zero were The possible explanation of competing risk of deaths on
similar in males (28.5 years) and in females (23.8 years). the declines after ages 55–59 years in the incidence rates
However, modelling of the curves suggested divergent of NPC and its male to female ratio could not be ruled
slopes for men and women (P = 0.02) with a delay in out. However, during the study period 1983–2008, the
increasing incidence with age among females by overall mortality rates after the age of 75 years were
5–10 years before menopause ages. approximately 7% and 6% for males and females,
respectively but only 0.4% and 0.2% for males and
4. Discussion females, respectively, before the age of 75 years.32 Since
the competing risk of deaths on disease rates is usually
The present study confirmed the long-recognised evident at very old ages while the observed declines
male predominance in the incidence rate of NPC. It also occurred at somewhat earlier ages, the influence of com-
suggested that the male to female ratio of NPC inci- peting risk of deaths on the incidence rates of NPC and
dence was age-dependent where it increased with age its sex ratio would be minor. In addition, because the life
until peaking at ages 55–59 years and declined thereaf- expectancies for both sexes in Hong Kong have steadily
ter, in addition to a minor peak among adolescents. increased during the past several decades,33 this influ-
The male predominance in the incidence of NPC was ence is expected to be even weaker in the future.
related to a delayed development in female, especially The contributions of intrinsic exposures merit consid-
before menopause. eration. The hypothesis of a protective effect of oestro-
The aetiology of NPC has not been completely under- gen on the risk of developing NPC is supported by the
stood yet. Previous lines of evidence have strongly indi- age-dependent sex ratio in the incidence of NPC with
cated that Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection might play an inflection at menopause ages and a delay in the devel-
a crucial role in the development of NPC,1,15–17 opment of NPC in females before menopause observed
although it was not considered to be a sufficient cause in this study, although the observed decrease in the inci-
of NPC since EBV is ubiquitous and more than 90% dence rate of NPC in females after 60 years old did not
adults all over the world are healthy carriers of EBV speak for a strong effect of oestrogen. To our knowl-
yet only a very small proportion of the population edge, the association between sex hormone exposures
develop NPC.1,18 Some other non-viral factors have also and the risk of NPC in humans has not been examined
been associated with elevated NPC risk, including inap- in epidemiological studies till now, which need further
propriate diet,19–21 active smoking,22,23 environmental investigations in the future. In addition, this hypothesis
tobacco smoke (ETS),23 occupational exposures to is actually plausible based on biological evidences. For
formaldehyde and dusts,24,25 as well as some genetic pre- example, oestrogen is known to mediate inhibition of
dispositions.26–28 The sex difference in incidence of NPC inflammatory responses which are important contribut-
may be attributable to some of these environmental ing factors to carcinogenesis.34–36 Furthermore, oestro-
exposures which are unequally distributed across sexes. gen is known to exert its biological actions through
An alternative explanation is the ‘X-linked recessive the activation of oestrogen receptors (ERs) and ERs
mutation’ hypothesis with the involvement of X-chro- have been identified in NPC tissues.37 A repressor of
mosome with EBV infection in the development of ERs, the NAG7, was also found to be a negative regu-
NPC.29 In support of this, Wee et al. have also traced lator of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell growth.38 Thus,
ancient migration histories and modern genetic signa- if the speculated protective effect on NPC risk really
tures and suggested a plausible female transmission.30 exists, it may be mediated by ERs.
The major findings of the present study that both the The minor increase in the male to female ratio
incidence rates of NPC and its male to female ratio in NPC incidence at ages 15–19 observed in the
increased with age until peaking around ages 55– present study reminds of additional peaks among late
59 years and declined at older ages seem not to be adolescents/young adults in age-incidence curves of
explained by EBV infection because EBV infection per- NPC previously reported in several populations.1,4,9–11
sists life-long and does not differ across the sexes.18,31 It The early peaks in the bimodal age-specific curves of
is also less likely to be explained by dietary factors, both incidence and sex ratio in incidence could imply
active smoking, ETS, or indoor air pollution since there roles of exposures in early life that are differentially
is no strong evidence supporting declines in the preva- distributed among the two sexes, including changes in
lence of these exposures after around ages 55–59 years sex hormones. However, because of the relative rarity
which are more marked in males. Hazardous occupa- of NPC among adolescents/young adults, the early peak
tional exposures may, at least partly, explain this finding in the age-specific curve of male to female ratio in NPC
154 S.-H. Xie et al. / European Journal of Cancer 49 (2013) 150–155
13. Rutegard M, Shore R, Lu Y, Lagergren P, Lindblad M. Sex 28. Ng CC, Yew PY, Puah SM, et al. A genome-wide association
differences in the incidence of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma in study identifies ITGA9 conferring risk of nasopharyngeal carci-
Sweden 1970–2006. Eur J Cancer 2010;46(6):1093–100. noma. J Hum Genet 2009;54(7):392–7.
14. Pompei F, Wilson R. Age distribution of cancer: the incidence 29. Simons MJ. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma as a paradigm of cancer
turnover at old age. Hum Ecol Risk Asses 2001;7(6):1619–50. genetics. Chin J Cancer 2011;30(2):79–82.
15. Chien YC, Chen JY, Liu MY, et al. Serologic markers of Epstein- 30. Wee JTS, Ha TC, Loong SLE, Qian CN. Is nasopharyngeal cancer
Barr virus infection and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwanese really a “Cantonese cancer”? Chin J Cancer 2010;29(5):517–26.
men. N Engl J Med 2001;345(26):1877–82. 31. Pickinson AB, Kieff E. Epistein-Barr virus. In: Knipe DM,
16. Hsu WL, Chen JY, Chien YC, et al. Independent effect of EBV Howley PM, editors. Field’s virology. 4th ed. Philadelphia (Penn-
and cigarette smoking on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a 20-year sylvania): Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 2575–627.
follow-up study on 9622 males without family history in Taiwan. 32. Hong Kong Department of Health. Vital statistics (Available from:
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(4):1218–26. http://www.healthyhk.gov.hk/phisweb/en/enquiry/index.html).
17. Perez-Ordonez B. An update on Epstein-Barr virus and nasopha- 33. Center for Health Protection, Hong Kong Department of Health.
ryngeal carcinogenesis. Head Neck Pathol 2007;1(2):141–5. Life Expectancy at Birth (Male and Female), 1971–2011 (Avail-
18. Kangro HO, Osman HK, Lau YL, et al. Seroprevalence of able from: http://www.chp.gov.hk/en/data/4/10/27/111.html).
antibodies to human herpes viruses in England and Hong Kong. J 34. Naugler WE, Sakurai T, Kim S, et al. Gender disparity in liver
Med Virol 1994;43(1):91–6. cancer due to sex differences in MyD88-dependent IL-6 produc-
19. Guo X, Johnson RC, Deng H, et al. Evaluation of nonviral risk tion. Science 2007;317(5834):121–4.
factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a high-risk population of 35. Steffan RJ, Matelan E, Ashwell MA, et al. Control of chronic
Southern China. Int J Cancer 2009;124(12):2942–7. inflammation with pathway selective estrogen receptor ligands.
20. Yuan JM, Wang XL, Xiang YB, et al. Preserved foods in relation Curr Top Med Chem 2006;6(2):103–11.
to risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Shanghai, China. Int J 36. Harnish DC. Estrogen receptor ligands in the control of patho-
Cancer 2000;85(3):358–63. genic inflammation. Curr Opin Investig Drugs
21. Gallicchio L, Matanoski G, Tao XG, et al. Adulthood consump- 2006;7(11):997–1001.
tion of preserved and nonpreserved vegetables and the risk of 37. Zheng T, Li J, Liu X. The study of estrogen and progesterone
nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review. Int J Cancer receptor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Cancer Res
2006;119(5):1125–35. 1996;8(1):64–6.
22. Cheng YJ, Hildesheim A, Hsu MM, et al. Cigarette smoking, 38. Huang C, Wu M, Tang Y, et al. NAG7 promotes human
alcohol consumption and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in nasopharyngeal carcinoma invasion through inhibition of estrogen
Taiwan. Cancer Causes Control 1999;10(3):201–7. receptor alpha and up-regulation of JNK2/AP-1/MMP1 path-
23. Yuan JM, Wang XL, Xiang YB, et al. Non-dietary risk factors for ways. J Cell Physiol 2009;221(2):394–401.
nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Shanghai, China. Int J Cancer 39. Tobacco Control Office, Hong Kong Department of Health.
2000;85(3):364–9. Pattern of smoking in Hong Kong (Available from: http://
24. Hildesheim A, Dosemeci M, Chan CC, et al. Occupational www.tco.gov.hk/english/infostation/infostation_sta_01.html).
exposure to wood, formaldehyde, and solvents and risk of 40. The Family Planning Association of Hong Kong. Survey on
nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev family planning knowledge, attitude and practice in Hong Kong
2001;10(11):1145–53. 2007 (Available from: http://www.famplan.org.hk/fpahk/en/tem-
25. Vaughan TL, Stewart PA, Teschke K, et al. Occupational plate1.asp?style=template1.asp&content=info/research.asp).
exposure to formaldehyde and wood dust and nasopharyngeal 41. Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. Demographic
carcinoma. Occup Environ Med 2000;57(6):376–84. Characteristics, Gender Statistics (Available from: http://www.cen-
26. Bei JX, Li Y, Jia WH, et al. A genome-wide association study of statd.gov.hk/hong_kong_statistics/gender/demographic/index.jsp).
nasopharyngeal carcinoma identifies three new susceptibility loci. 42. Vaughan TL, Shapiro JA, Burt RD, et al. Nasopharyngeal cancer
Nat Genet 2010;42(7):599–603. in a low-risk population: defining risk factors by histological type.
27. Jia WH, Pan QH, Qin HD, et al. A case-control and a family- Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996;5(8):587–93.
based association study revealing an association between CYP2E1 43. Spano JP, Busson P, Atlan D, Bourhis J, Pignon JP. Nasopha-
polymorphisms and nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk in Cantonese. ryngeal carcinoma: an update. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(15):2121–35.
Carcinogenesis 2009;30(12):2031–6.