Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Coronavirus
Human, Social and Political Implications
Editor
James Miller
Duke Kunshan University
Kunshan, China
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer
Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights
of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such
names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for
general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and informa-
tion in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither
the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with
respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been
made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps
and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore
189721, Singapore
Introduction
v
vi INTRODUCTION
seminar formed the initial seeds that led to the short essays and reflections
presented in this volume.
The justification for this interdisciplinary and humanistic approach to
the coronavirus developed from my incipient understanding of this disease
as a planetary phenomenon that would expose the deep porosity of our
bodies and our psyches, and one whose effects would first be felt in a
Sino–United States joint venture university. Sometimes it felt that we
were being strangled at birth, the immense audacity, vision, and enter-
prise necessary to give birth to an innovative liberal arts and science
university in an increasingly illiberal China seemingly powerless in the
face of an invisible enemy. At other times it felt that in the very work
that we were doing together, China, United States, and other nations
could join together to forge a deeper and more perfect humanity. Little
could I foresee what the consequences of this apocalypse would be, but
I knew that it would be something that would change the nature of our
living together on our planetary home, and that to understand this change
required the work of the humanities and social sciences.
This short volume brings two styles of work together. Part I focuses
on memory and individual experience. It begins with a story of high
drama related by Denis Simon, then executive vice chancellor of Duke
Kunshan University. Simon relates how the university worked in collabo-
ration with Chinese and United States partners to grapple with and miti-
gate the effects of the pandemic, and offers insights into the nature and
value of collaborative relationships in times of crisis. This has implications
not only for joint venture universities or business, but on a larger scale
relate to the interactions between national governments.
The focus on memory and personal experience of what was first known
as “the Wuhan virus” continues with the work of the next three contri-
butions. Benjamin L. Bacon and Weijing Xu describe their work orga-
nizing and archiving the experiences of students at Duke Kunshan Univer-
sity who were under lockdown during the height of the crisis in China.
Yanping Ni analyzes the online diaries of Wuhan residents and recounts
both the everydayness and the crises that shaped the common identities of
Wuhan residents during lockdown. Moving from China to United States,
we read the work of Chen Chen, an undergraduate student at Duke
University, who writes movingly of the “hyper-visibility and invisibility” of
being Chinese in the United States during the outbreak: “When people,
including my friends, talked about China as if it were on a different planet,
viii INTRODUCTION
I felt myself internally screaming, “Why don’t you see me? I’m right
here.”
The first part of this book ends with a dramatic intervention by Zairong
Xiang that seeks to excavate the epistemological issues underlying the
frequent attitudes and acts of anti-Chinese racism that the virus has
brought forth. Noting the pointed criticism of China’s supposedly “dirty”
wet markets as an origin of the virus, Xiang recalls his experience of
those markets when he was growing up in China and launches both an
economic critique of globalization and also a epistemological critique of
those who would assert the supposed superiority of European rationality.
Part 2 of the book seeks to put the experience of the Coronavirus
pandemic into historical, cultural, and political perspective, and to offer
some tentative assessments of its impact in those areas. Nicole Barnes
shows firstly how a “double erasure of women’s work” during the Coro-
navirus outbreak contains echoes of similar erasures in the history of war
and disease in the twentieth century. She follows this with a historical
analysis of race in times of plague and disease, exposing the bigotry in
the familiar racist trope of China as “the sick man of Asia.” The next
two essays focus on problems of reasoning and knowledge. Carlos Rojas
focuses on the fact that the apparently unforeseen “black swan event” of
the coronavirus outbreak was in fact widely predicted, modeled and antic-
ipated by both the US government and the United Nations. Ignoring
these predictions and models is a means for governments to justify their
failure to respond adequately to the viral outbreak.
The final two papers focus on the significance of the virus for the
legitimacy of the Chinese government. Melanie Manion’s essay on infor-
mation politics focuses on the key issue of information transparency in
China’s communist government. Local governments fail to report prob-
lems upwards, and the central government tightly controls the spread
of information downwards. This “endemic lack of transparency within
China” entails failures of governance that the communist party refuses
to acknowledge. Despite these evident failures of governance, Andrew
W. MacDonald argues, the authority of the communist party in general
and Xi Jinping in particular does not face a serious existential threat.
However, MacDonald cautions us to pay attention to the unsustainable
INTRODUCTION ix
James Miller
Notes
1. Volkmar, Barbara, “The Concept of Contagion in Chinese Medical
Thought: Empirical Knowledge versus Cosmological Order,” History and
Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22.2 (2000), 148.
2. Volkmar, “The Concept of Contagion,” 150.
Contents
xi
xii CONTENTS
Historical Echoes 53
Nicole Elizabeth Barnes
Contributors
xiii
xiv EDITOR AND CONTRIBUTORS
Prize from the American Historical Association and the 2020 William H.
Welch Medal from the American Association for the History of Medicine.
Yuexuan Chen is a rising senior at Duke University who is studying
public policy, biology and journalism. Her family connections to Wuhan
and her childhood spent straddling the United States and China guided
her writing on the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan.
Andrew W. MacDonald is an Assistant Professor of Social Science at
Duke Kunshan University. He received his B.A. in History and M.A. in
East Asian Studies from Stanford University and his M.Phil. and Ph.D. in
Politics from Oxford University. His research focuses on political beliefs,
attitudes toward minorities, government promotion patterns, and online
privacy issues in China.
Melanie Manion is the Vor Broker Family Distinguished Professor of
Political Science at Duke University. Her research focuses on contem-
porary authoritarianism, with empirical work on bureaucracy, corrup-
tion, information, and representation in China. Her most recent book
is Information for Autocrats (Cambridge University Press, 2015).
Yanping Ni is a graduate student in East Asian Studies at Duke Univer-
sity. She is currently a graduate fellow in the Duke Ethnography Lab
and a Research Assistant in the “Revaluing Care in the Global Econ-
omy” network. Her research interests focus on the intersection of the
environment, health, and visual culture in China.
Carlos Rojas is Professor of Chinese Cultural Studies, Gender, Sexuality,
& Feminist Studies, and Arts of the Moving Image at Duke University. He
is the author, editor, and translator of numerous works, including Home-
sickness: Culture, Contagion, and National Transformation in Modern
China.
Denis Simon is Senior Adviser to the President for China Affairs at Duke
University. He also is Professor of China Business and Technology in the
Fuqua School of Business. From 2015 to 2020, he served as Executive
Vice-Chancellor of Duke Kunshan University, a Sino–United States joint
venture sponsored by Duke, Wuhan University and the city of Kunshan.
He holds an M.A. in Asian Studies and a Ph.D. in Political Science from
UC Berkeley.
EDITOR AND CONTRIBUTORS xv
Zairong Xiang is the author of the book Queer Ancient Ways: A Decolo-
nial Exploration (Punctum Books, 2018). He is the Assistant Professor
of Comparative Literature and the Associate Director of Arts at Duke
Kunshan University. He curated the “minor cosmopolitan weekend” at
the HKW Haus der Kulturen der Welt (2018), and is the editor of its
catalogue Minor Cosmopolitan: Thinking Art, Politics and the Universe
Together Otherwise (Diaphanes, 2020).
Weijing Xu is a media artist, designer, and researcher who works at
the intersect of computation, cybernetics and network systems, biomedia
and wearable technology. She has exhibited in Asia, America, Europe,
and Australia. Her Silkworm Project, Spun Silk Artifact is permanently
collected by the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. She is
Assistant Professor of Media & Art at Duke Kunshan University.
Memoir and Reflection
Arresting COVID-19: Perspectives
from a Sino-US Joint Venture University
Denis Simon
Abstract The tumult produced by the onset and spread of the COVID-
19 virus has had a demonstrably chilling effect on the nature of Sino-US
relations. American and Chinese leaders have hurled multiple accusations
about the origins of the virus across the Pacific; US officials have been
particularly dismayed by the lack of transparency by their counterparts in
China during the initial advances of the coronavirus in Wuhan and Hubei
province. Remarkably, however, in contrast to the initial mishandling of
the COVID-19 virus by PRC officials at the national level, the situation
within the Sino-US joint venture universities, e.g. Duke Kunshan Univer-
sity, was quite the opposite, with both sides cooperating and moving in
tandem to protect the safety and well-being of the students, staff and
faculty. This win-win experience highlights the potential mutual bene-
fits of a more collegial, highly collaborative US-China partnership if and
when both sides choose to work together with a set of shared goal and
objectives.
D. Simon (B)
Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
e-mail: Denis.simon@duke.edu
Overview
The onset of the coronavirus epidemic has set in motion a range of
forces that promise to alter the dynamics of Sino-US relations for a
long-time to come. Both countries have suffered immensely from the
rapidity with which the virus overtook their respective societies and the
challenges they each faced in bringing the virus under some form of
comprehensive control. The fundamental differences between the Amer-
ican and Chinese political systems and cultures as well as their different
demographic and ethnic structures produced very different responses.
With the international spread of the coronavirus into a global pandemic
came a broad range of barbs, accusations, criticisms and finger-pointing
between Beijing and Washington DC. The ensuing war of words about
how the virus started in Wuhan and how it was handled only has served
to heighten existing tensions stemming from their still not-yet-fully unre-
solved “trade war” and has generated bad feelings across the Pacific,
including the use of racially-charged language by the President of the
United States, Donald J. Trump, who purposely labelled COVID-19
“the Chinese virus.”1 In many respects, the on-going unabated conflicts
between the world’s two most important nations has deprived both coun-
tries of many potential medical and related benefits that could have come
from better communications and closer cooperation at an earlier point in
time.2
Interestingly, while at the macro political level, tensions flared and
blatant falsehoods about the source of the virus were thrown across the
Pacific,3 at the micro or operational level, the situation was quite the
opposite. People-to-people diplomacy continued to work well as many
Americans helped to provide needed PPE (personal protective equip-
ment) and other items to China during the first three months of 2020.
Then, as the situation in China improved sharply and the virus spread
across the US, numerous Chinese organizations and citizens came to the
aid of their American friends with shipments of masks and other needed
medical supplies, etc. As the Executive Vice Chancellor sitting inside one
of the only nine approved joint venture universities (at Duke Kunshan
University), I had a front row seat during the initial evolution of the
virus in China. Fortunately, once the initial clouds of uncertainty and
information blockage faded away about the Wuhan situation and greater
transparency occurred, there was a concerted effort to strengthen the
bridges of cooperation and communications among all the key players
ARRESTING COVID-19: PERSPECTIVES FROM A SINO-US … 5
Asia, and other parts of the world. This left a small number of key staff
on campus to oversee the general situation as was normally done on
extended holidays; some international students who chose not to return
home and a modest number of Chinese students all decided to spend the
holiday on campus. Several Chinese staff from the Kunshan/Suzhou area
remained in the area as did the Chancellor, FENG Youmei, who was from
Wuhan but had decided to stay on campus to oversee the campus during
the Chinese New Year holiday. Just as the campus began to clear out,
however, the news emerged from the Chinese government that all educa-
tion institutions needed to take special precautions to address the rapid
spread of the coronavirus. This led to an immediate critical decision to
organize an emergency task force to take the necessary protective actions.
As a Sino-US joint venture, the leadership had faced many challenging
situations in the past; the differences in culture and political systems had
not always led to a common perspective on appropriate actions or decision
criteria regarding academic affairs, student issues, financial matters, etc. In
the case of COVID-19, however, something was different. Working with
inputs from various sources in the US, including Duke University and
following the increasingly serious tone of Chinese government directives,
it became clear that evacuating our students was a top priority. A decision
was made to provide financial support for all Chinese and international
students to return to the safety of their homes. The only exception were
the students from Hubei province who simply could not return home due
to the growing severity of the virus. In the end, our campus ended up with
about 60 of our 725 undergraduate and graduate students remaining on
campus.
We also imposed a complete lockdown for the entire campus. This was
no small decision. No outside food deliveries, no Starbucks deliveries, no
packages, etc. The campus was closed to all visitors, all vendors, and most
service personnel. Soon after the bulk of the students departed, including
all but two international students from Vietnam, the three major US
airlines flying to China decided to shut down service, e.g. United Airlines
quickly decided to cut service on February 5th. The shutdown of the
US carriers led to a decision to evacuate other international staff as seats
became scarce and the virus showed no signs of ebbing; staff and faculty
who already had been overseas decided that a return to China was not a
good idea. On February 2nd, US President Trump put in place an exec-
utive order that the US would halt the travel of China passport holders
to the US unless they had a direct family relationship.6
ARRESTING COVID-19: PERSPECTIVES FROM A SINO-US … 7
What is remarkable about the 5–6 weeks between the onset of the virus
in mid-January and the ensuing period is the degree to which all the part-
ners in the joint venture actually worked together in an almost seamless
manner to address the needs of the DKU community—not just those
located in Kunshan or even in China, but all around the world. With
a student body from over 40 different countries and a faculty from 13
different countries, it was not easy to keep track of where everyone was
located. The Chinese government at the local, provincial and national
level was constantly in touch with DKU staff to collect concrete data
about the location of the various members of our community; continuous
efforts were made by our key staff on campus and elsewhere to gather
and report the necessary data as accurately as possible. In retrospect, one
of the key success factors that ultimately helped Jiangsu health authorities
moderate and arrest the spread of the virus across entire province was their
ability to act on reliable feeds of data not only from DKU and other local
universities, but also local communities to make relevant control deci-
sions.7 After an admittedly rather bumpy, inauspicious start, the formal
emergency task force units set up by the PRC government at multiple
levels served as an effective mechanism to ensure that local and eventu-
ally national policy decisions were being made based on real-time accurate
data.
As an academic institution, after protecting the health and safety of
the DKU community, our next priority was to begin consideration of
how we would continue forward with our education mission. DKU
classes are taught within a modular format; the university operates on
a calendar based on four 7-week modules: Fall 1, Fall 2 and Spring 3 and
Spring 4. DKU’s academic calendar is more aligned with Duke Univer-
sity in the US, and so unlike the other JV universities, DKU already had
begun Spring classes in early January. Faculty and students had finished
approximately three weeks of the Spring semester. The need to turn
to an online delivery model began to be talked about among China’s
education-related government agencies as part of a policy initiative called
“Suspending Classes without Stopping Learning.” Fortunately, DKU’s
American partner at Duke already had an experienced team in place to
work with our campus to facilitate the transition to an online delivery
capability. Due to the contributions of Duke colleagues and the close
working relationship that was forged very quickly, DKU was able to estab-
lish a full online university in just three weeks! I use the term “online
university” because we did not simply put courses online, but we also
8 D. SIMON
Duke for the Fall 2020 semester might start their undergraduate educa-
tion with Duke on the DKU campus—with classes being taught by a
combination of DKU and Duke faculty in a hybrid fashion.
2–3 times each day and if there was communication needed with Duke in
the US, some of DKU colleagues slept very few hours and vice versa on
the US side. The sense that there was a serious common threat that knew
no nationality or ethnicity helped to overcome the types of acrimony that
sometimes had been present on previous occasions. The internal DKU
team via the DKU Emergency Task Force operated in a cohesive fashion
as every person rose to the occasion of this serious epidemic.
Finally, there was strong cooperation across the board from faculty
and students as well as the staff once the full severity of the coronavirus
epidemic was grasped. After a bit of wrangling over the timing of campus
departures and reimbursements for travel, everyone worked together as
part of one larger community facing the same critical danger. The situ-
ation was helped along by a full-scale communications effort directed at
parents, students, faculty and staff. As the US partner in the joint venture,
Duke had received numerous inquiries and expressions of concern from
American parents about their children attending DKU; it was quickly
recognized that the coronavirus problem was not simply a DKU or China
problem. The issue was gradually, but steadily becoming both a Duke
issue and a US-China issue. By immediately conducting a full-court press
in terms of information availability and pro-active communications, the
entire community was able to operate with the same information in hand.
This attenuated attention to communications occurred in both Chinese
and English, and was aided by a very active social media presence. During
such crisis moments, it is easy for the Internet to get filled with false
rumors and misinformation; the rapid response to the need for accurate
information pre-empted what could have been a field day for so-called
“fake news” to circulate far and wide. Social media could have become
the Achilles heel of the DKU situation, but instead it became one of the
key success factors in helping to maintain calm during a period of great
uncertainty.
Overall, as this analysis suggests, it turns out that the comments from
Duke President Vince Price during one of his initial visits to China was
prescient. In referring to Duke Kunshan University, he stated that “DKU
is a beacon of light within the turbulence surrounding US-China rela-
tions.” DKU was able to weather the severe storm brought on by the
coronavirus. According to available information, not one case of the coro-
navirus was reported from within the entire DKU community. All three
partners—Duke University, Wuhan University, and the city of Kunshan,
worked to support the many needs of the university during its most trying
ARRESTING COVID-19: PERSPECTIVES FROM A SINO-US … 11
Notes
1. Renee DiResta, “For China: The “USA Virus” Is a Geopolitical Ploy,” The
Atlantic, April 11, 2020.
2. “Research Finds Huge Impact of Interventions on the Spread of COVID-
19,” The Guardian, March 11, 2020.
3. Shayan Sardarizadeh and Olga Robinson, “Coronavirus: US and China
Trade Conspiracy Theories,” BBC Monitoring, April 26, 2020. See also
Xinhuanet, “Reality Check of US Allegations Against China on COVID-
19,” Xinhua News Agency, May 10, 2020.
4. Aimee Cunningham, “People Who Didn’t Know They Had COVID-19
Drove Its Spread in China,” Science News, March 17, 2020.
5. David Ignatius, “How Did COVID-19 Begin: Its Initial Origin Story Is
Shaky,” Washington Post, April 2, 2020. See also “The Origin of COVID-
19: The Pieces of the Puzzle of COVID-19’s Origin Are Coming to
Light,” Economist, May 2, 2020.
6. “Trump Administration Restricts Entry into US from China,” New York
Times, January 31, 2020. See also “Trump’s Claims That He Imposed the
First China Ban,” Washington Post, April 7, 2020.
7. Sharon Begley, “Once Widely Criticized, the Wuhan Quarantine Bought
the World Time to Prepare for COVID-19,” STAT News, February 21,
2020.
8. “Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China National
Immigration Administration Announcement on the Temporary Suspension
of Entry by Foreign Nationals Holding Valid Chinese Visas and Residence
Permits,” Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Beijing, March 26, 2020.
9. David Cyranoski, “We Need to Be Alert: Scientists Fear Second Coron-
avirus Wave as China’s Lockdowns Ease,” Nature, March 30, 2020.
Memory, Storytelling and GIS Digital Archive:
Introducing the COVID-19 Memory Archival
Project
B. L. Bacon (B) · W. Xu
Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China
e-mail: Benjamin.bacon@dukekunshan.edu.cn
W. Xu
e-mail: Weijing.xu@dukekunshan.edu.cn
function of virtual memorials and how they might facilitate discourse and
contribute to broader geocultural dialogues.
The impetus behind this research stems from the authors’ reflections
of past personal experiences with viral outbreak and cultural dynamics
between East and West in light of the present global crises. The stark
contrast in pandemic understanding and response across cultures is
shocking, but these differences were already present years before. One
recollection of a classroom discussion in 2011 between Beijinger’s and
New Yorker’s foreshadowed the responses of China and the US in 2020.
There exists an urgency to bridge the gaps between different realities, as
collaboration and unity is essential in overcoming existential risks of the
future.
The Covid-19 Memory Archival Project was presented at The Coro-
navirus: Human, Social and Political Implications conference at Duke
University’s Franklin Humanities Institute, jointly organized with Duke
Kunshan University’s Humanities Research Center, held on March 3rd,
2020. The ideas presented here expand upon the original oral presenta-
tion.
Overview of Approach
First launched on March 1, 2020, The COVID-19 Memory Archival
Project was developed with the support of the Health Humanities Lab
and Humanities Research Center at Duke Kunshan University (DKU) in
China in collaboration with Duke University, and with faculty and student
participation from the University of North Carolina in the USA. As a
US-Sino joint venture between Duke University and Wuhan University,
DKU’s diverse community of student, faculty and staff come from many
provinces in China, as well as a variety of nationalities.
In late January, during the week of the Chinese New Year holiday, the
news of a deadly virus broke out across the country. Many individuals
were traveling in the midst of the largest human migrations in the world.
As the nation went into emergency lockdown, our students and faculty
found themselves stranded across geographies. Universities across China
postponed the start of school, as administration and faculty prepared
academic content for online delivery. It was under these circumstances
that a small group of DKU faculty and administrators traveling abroad
at the time regrouped at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina
to discuss approaches to conducting undergraduate liberal arts education
in a digital context. Displaced and facing an uncertain future, bound by
academic responsibility paired with individual experiences that mirrored
16 B. L. BACON AND W. XU
Conclusion
The phenomenon of the archival multiverse has reshaped our imagina-
tions of what memory, experience, history and heritage can be, redefining
the concept of the archive and its many practices. Fueled by the rise of the
internet and self-publishing culture, traditional archiving methods give
way to crowd sourced processes, allowing the many to co-author a collec-
tive narrative, providing “a substantial counterbalance to the dangers
posed by the creation of digital humanities macroscopes” (Prescott 2020).
As immersive, embodied, spatial technologies mature and popularize,
new opportunities are presented for the archivist. However, literacies
of these technologies pose a stumbling block for wider rollout and
adaptation, especially in earlier stages. In the case of The COVID-19
Memory Archival Project, much effort was devoted to familiarizing partic-
ipants with the platform environment and cultivating individualized media
expression.
Yet the turn towards a geospatial approach across disciplines is
inevitable. Already, the media that we consume is innately referential of
place. Photos and videos taken with our smart phones are embedded
with location data. We share our experiences on Facebook, Instagram and
WeChat through spatial tags. GPS navigation systems have replaced our
own biological sense of geographical location. Our lives, whether digital
or physical, are already largely framed by these platforms and instruments.
Like a prosthetic, everyday devices provide a continuous data stream of
space and place, and yet for many, interpretation of this data still sits
in traditional information infrastructures, rendering these new realities
invisible. As Roger M. Downs notes, “… it is important to understand
the links between the geospatial revolution and the geographic sense
of self. People adapt to technologies, and technologies are adapted to
human needs” (Downs 2014). One might argue that perhaps a new
digital geospatial cosmology is called for. This new concept of “situated
knowledge” transforms the virtual archive from a data representation to a
platform for discourse and dialogue (Jackson 2020). Critical GIS presents
MEMORY, STORYTELLING AND GIS DIGITAL … 21
References
A COVID-19 Story from Nepal. 2020. The COVID-19 Memory Archival
Project. https://arcg.is/1yy8Sm.
Advance!Advance at All Costs!!. 2020. The COVID-19 Memory Archival
Project. https://arcg.is/159P8r.
Downs, Roger M. 2014. Coming of Age in the Geospatial Revolution: The
Geographic Self Re-Defined. Human Development 57: 35–57. https://doi.
org/10.1159/000358319.
Jackson, Tom. 2020. I’ve Never Told Anybody That Before. In Communities,
Archives and New Collaborative Practices, ed. Simon Popple, Andrew Prescott,
and Daniel H. Mutibwa, 1st ed., 93–106. Bristol University Press. https://
doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvx1hvvd.13.
Humanity Crisis Under the Surface of Coronavirus. 2020. The COVID-19
Memory Archival Project. https://arcg.is/040qnj.
Hurricane Digital Memory Bank. 2005. http://hurricanearchive.org.
Life in the Square. 2020. The COVID-19 Memory Archival Project. https://
arcg.is/O5nK4.
Our Story: Kunshan To Durham. 2020. The COVID-19 Memory Archival
Project. https://arcg.is/4faH0.
Popple, Simon, Daniel H. Mutibwa, and Andrew Prescott. 2020. Community
Archives and the Creation of Living Knowledge. In Communities, Archives
and New Collaborative Practices, ed. Simon Popple, Daniel H. Mutibwa, and
Andrew Prescott, 1st ed., 1–18. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.
2307/j.ctvx1hvvd.7.
Prescott, Andrew. 2020. Community Archives and the Health of the Internet. In
Communities, Archives and New Collaborative Practices, ed. Andrew Prescott,
Simon Popple, and Daniel H. Mutibwa, 1st ed., 251–268. Bristol University
Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvx1hvvd.24.
Recuber, Timothy. 2016. Consuming Catastrophe: Mass Culture in America’s
Decade of Disaster. Temple University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv
rdf341.
Share Your Story · A Journal of the Plague Year · Covid-19 Archive. 2020.
http://covid-19archive.org.
Shrouded in Darkness-2020. 2020. The COVID-19 Memory Archival Project.
https://arcg.is/1XejXq0.
22 B. L. BACON AND W. XU
Smith, Sidonie, and Julia Watson. 2002. Reading Autobiography: A Guide for
Interpreting Life Narratives, Second Edition. University of Minnesota Press.
https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816669851.001.0001.
[Teach311 + COVID-19] Collective. 2011. [Teach311 + COVID-19] Collec-
tive. http://teach311.org.
Teo, Grace, and Lisa Onaga. 2019. Making Meanings: Introducing the
Teach311.org Interview Collection. Verge: Studies in Global Asias 5: 46–58.
University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/vergstudglobasia.5.
1.0046.
The COVID-19 Memory Archival Project. 2020. The COVID-19 Memory
Archival Project. https://arcg.is/1OLGz1.
The COVID-19 Memory Archival Project Tutorial. 2020. The COVID-19
Memory Archival Project. https://arcg.is/z4Ljb.
The World Beyond Quarantine. 2020. The COVID-19 Memory Archival Project.
https://arcg.is/fWun1.
Verhulst, Stefaan G. 2008. Linked Geographies: Maps as Mediators of Reality.
In The Hyperlinked Society: Questioning Connections in the Digital Age,
ed. Joseph Turow and Lokman Tsui, 191–205. Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65sxn0.19.
Where Were You | September 11th, 2001. 2001. http://wherewereyou.org.
Wilson, Matthew W. 2015. Paying Attention, Digital Media, and Community-
Based Critical GIS. Cultural Geographies 22: 177–191. https://doi.org/10.
1177/1474474014539249.
Witness Pandemic. 2020. The COVID-19 Memory Archival Project. https://
arcg.is/1W5i8O0.
Separate Realities: Being Wuhanese
and American Throughout COVID-19
Yuexuan Chen
Y. Chen (B)
Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
e-mail: yuexuan.chen@duke.edu
all of China on hold and affecting every person with some kind of China
connection at Duke. Then, when my article was supposed to be published
again, the editor in chief said that a breaking news story about a swastika
painted on the bridge took precedence.
Finally, on February 14, after feeling gaslighted into thinking that
my story wasn’t time-sensitive or important, my story went live. The
outpour of hundreds of responses from the Duke community and beyond
shocked me to my core. My editor felt that the story wasn’t urgent, but
every response I received to it came with a great sense of urgency. Every
message about how someone was able to connect to my story left me in
tears. I grew so used to the constant contempt for Chinese people that
I could never have imagined my story on “Wuhan coronavirus” would
garner zero negative responses and was even featured in my hometown
paper, at the publication where I interned last summer in South Africa
and on a medical supplies donation NGO site.
Even at Duke, with a sister school outside of Shanghai created under a
partnership with Wuhan University and a substantial Chinese student and
faculty population, the general dialogue on coronavirus in February—
although touched by my story—continued to be largely unconcerned. It
was merely a touch. As the Health and Science editor, I continued to
pitch coronavirus related stories which were met with my editor saying,
“We’ve already done a lot of COVID-19 coverage.”
I met with my dean to discuss summer plans and mentioned that I got
the Kenan Fellowship grant for a project in South Africa that probably
won’t happen because of coronavirus. She said that coronavirus wasn’t
anything worse than the flu for healthy people, which echoed the New
York Times COVID-19 information panel stating that coronavirus was a
less immediate threat than the flu. I didn’t correct her because I under-
stood that people in America didn’t get exactly how bad the situation was
in Wuhan (and how difficult it was becoming in places like Iran, South
Korea, Singapore and Japan).
No normal flu could wreak that level of havoc anywhere in the
world. It’s not SARS, it’s not influenza—there was no accurate modern
comparison for the horror that COVID-19 caused in unprepared, caught-
off-guard situations. My best friend said that I and my other suitemate
from Beijing went overboard by telling the other two rowdy suitemates
that after spring break, they weren’t allowed to have social gatherings in
the living room. It wasn’t that serious, she said.
26 Y. CHEN
These are all people I care about and respect. They mean well. They
heard what I was saying, but weren’t listening. It was so much worse than
what people could imagine to be put effectively into words and I was
internally crying: why don’t you get it? At the same time, I questioned
my sanity.
COVID Is Here
From the end of January to the beginning of March, I felt like I was living
a double life. It seemed like everything was normal where I’d go about
my day attending class, skating practice and meetings, but every night, I
would go back to my dorm room to waves of terrible news about Wuhan,
where most of my family lives—praying to some sort of higher being for
any kind of respite and normalcy.
I also joined Dr. Gregory Gray’s Duke One Health lab in early
February, and I remember him saying right away that it wasn’t a ques-
tion of if, but when coronavirus was coming to Durham. COVID-19 was
already spreading in Singapore where some of our colleagues were. He
advised all of us to prepare some masks and enough food and supplies for
at least a week of unexpected lockdown.
It took until late March for these worlds to collide as COVID-19
ripped through America, Duke was shut down and Dr. Gray’s lab was
taking COVID-19 patient samples for research.
Mid-February, one of my suitemates had a lingering flu or cold.
Another girl who didn’t live in our suite but frequently visited said that
she had pneumonia. I was petrified and aggressively washed my hands
after touching every surface in our suite. February 22, I went out with
my two friends to a party where I had a terrible feeling that it might be
my last, at least until COVID-19 was under control. On February 24, I
was chatting with the editor during my Chronicle editing shift and he said
that he was going to Italy for spring break. I nervously laughed and said
that was not going to happen and was a terrible idea. He said that it was
already all planned out and he and his friend were going to the south,
not the north where an outbreak had already begun.
Still, people couldn’t comprehend the severity and unpredictability of
this disease. Chinese people weren’t some sort of alien, diseased and dirty
vector that caused infection rates to explode. China wasn’t locking down
and temporarily crippling their entire economy simply for the draconian,
authoritarian fun of it.
SEPARATE REALITIES: BEING WUHANESE AND AMERICAN … 27
public policy, biology and journalism with a mother who went to medical
school in Wuhan put me in a strangely fateful position to write about this
pandemic.
However, every time I wrote something and got a stream of replies
about how my reporting brought a story that was a fresh news angle,
I felt like a fraud because, personally, it wasn’t news. It felt like stale,
common knowledge, considering the outbreak had been going on for so
long already.
other side of the world? When a nation in which I’m a registered voter
invades a country with supposedly people who just aren’t the same, how
do I relate to lives that, at first glance, are too disparate to grasp?
In order to solve modern global problems, we’re going to have to
learn how to love people we feel like we can’t relate to and who don’t
look or talk like us. We are a product of our realities that are no longer
as independent from each other as they used to be in a pre-industrial
world. The closer the world grows from the internet and global trade, the
more we are exposed to the different realities around us and our increased
responsibility in empathizing for and learning from circumstances that
aren’t our own.
We are all too interconnected to allow innovation and solutions to
be limited within barriers set up by cultures, politics and borders. The
COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the big question for my genera-
tion. No longer what side are you on and for whom, but what are you
fighting for?
Observations on Wuhan Residents’ Diaries
Yanping Ni
Y. Ni (B)
Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
e-mail: Yanping.ni@duke.edu