Professional Documents
Culture Documents
“Shyam Nath and Yeti Nisha Madhoo have given scholars of comparative fiscal
federalism a book we have been waiting for. They walk us through the still under-
studied development of Local public finance in India and link its development
to the norms laid down in the now substantial literature about fiscal decentral-
ization in western countries. For experts in the field, this well researched and
well written book is a must for checking your thinking. For younger scholars, it
is a wonderful place to start.”
—Roy W. Bahl, Jr. Regents Professor Emeritus, Georgia State University, USA,
and Professor Extraordinaries, University of Pretoria, South Africa
“This book is a profound, lucid, timely and easily accessible account of issues
related to Urban Local Finance in a rapidly globalising world. It has some very
insightful illustrations from India that makes it even more attractive as India—a
developing country, is experiencing very rapid urbanization and will face many
novel issues in this area in the future. I strongly recommend this book to
students, policymakers and urban planners.”
—Raghbendra Jha, Emeritus Professor of Economics, Australian National
University
Shyam Nath · Yeti Nisha Madhoo
Vanishing Borders
of Urban Local
Finance
Global Developments with Illustrations from Indian
Federation
Shyam Nath Yeti Nisha Madhoo
Amrita Center for Economics Amrita Center for Economics
and Governance and Governance
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham
University University
Kollam, Kerala, India Kollam, Kerala, India
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer
Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights
of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such
names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for
general use.
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and informa-
tion in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither
the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with
respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been
made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps
and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore
189721, Singapore
Dedicated to Her Holiness Mata Amritanandamayi Devi
Chancellor, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University
Foreword
vii
viii FOREWORD
governments and their fiscal conditions, (2) how water supply regimes are
affected, and (3) how local governments are influenced by policy initia-
tives of the central and state governments’ efforts to lower atmospheric
pollutions.
One particularly unique analysis herein is consideration of the links
between fiscal decentralization and efforts undertaken by private enter-
prises under the umbrella term “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)”.
The CSR activities that private firms undertake to lessen the impacts of
globalization and climate change can interact with decentralized spending
and revenue raising efforts.
The book contains a blend of conceptual, but theoretically based,
arguments along with empirical, quantitative analyses of observed govern-
mental behaviors. Prominent in the latter are analyses of how local
governments in India have responded to their states’ spending policies as
well as the potential for urban local governments to mobilize additional
revenues. While the volume is focused particularly on urban governments
in India, many of the lessons learned, policy implications drawn, and
approaches to empirical analyses are potentially transferable to other coun-
tries. One overriding fact is that urban governments everywhere are or will
soon be facing the same challenges of globalization and climate change.
Larry Schroeder
Professor Emeritus
Department of Public
Administration and International
Affairs, The Maxwell School
of Citizenship & Public Affairs
Syracuse University
Syracuse, USA
Acknowledgments
ix
x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Shyam Nath
Yeti Nisha Madhoo
Contents
Index 359
xi
About the Authors
xiii
xiv ABOUT THE AUTHORS
xv
xvi LIST OF FIGURES
xvii
xviii LIST OF TABLES
1.1 Genesis
Local governments occupy an important place in public service delivery,
local economic and social development efforts, and environmental gover-
nance. The list of local goods and services in urban areas includes
street lighting, primary health, elementary schooling, sanitation, garbage
disposal, water and electricity supply, and traffic control. The theory
of fiscal federalism and the principle of subsidiarity posit that local
governments are more suited for the supply of local services in a local
jurisdiction. This contention stems from the federalism premise that the
benefit area of local operations generally coincides with the geograph-
ical limits of localities over which these authorities have informational
advantage about the citizen-voter preferences. Moreover, the subsidiarity
principle posits that a central authority should have a subsidiary func-
tion, performing only those tasks which cannot be performed at a more
local level. In other words, subsidiary level should be given the first pref-
erence over the whole for local functions. The theoretical grounding of
local government operations stemming from the subsidiarity principle has
however not manifested in local budgets and service delivery.
While the role of these subnational governments is rapidly expanding,
supported by theory and practice, availability of funds required to perform
the requisite duties is often inadequate in developing countries like India.
The principal reasons are slow-paced own revenue mobilization and
and charges such as property tax in urban local bodies and grants-in-aid
continued to be the mainstay of local finance.
despite that during this reform, some of the high performing local taxes
in terms of collections such as entertainment tax, entry tax, and tax on
advertisements have been submerged in GST and octroi, the most lucra-
tive source of revenue for some municipal corporation has been abolished.
Local property tax remains the major local tax with all its limitations due
to political interference in fixing rates and legal hurdles challenging the
valuation of property. Thus, financial empowerment of local government
to respond to the fast-growing demand for urban local public goods and
services seems to have taken a back seat. Moreover, there is a noticeable
change in practice as local revenue sources and expenditure responsibil-
ities have been encroached by other institutions. These include higher
levels of government, and parallel developments within the public sector
and private sector involvement in delivery of local public goods and
services. Interestingly, central and state governments have played a proac-
tive urban expenditure role at a cost, that is, crowding-out of local- and
community-level governments (Box 1.3).
that the institution of fiscal transfers can serve two purposes. First, differ-
ences in fiscal transfers can be used as an indicator of inter-locality service
differences, Two, grants can be used as an indicator of borderless juris-
dictions that would amount to vanishing borders of local budgets. It can
be postulated that the extent of the vanishing borders can be measured
by the differential growth rates of own revenues of local government
and grants from higher governments. It is further noted that the extent
of vertical spillover between local and central government will be much
lower than that between local and provincial government.
Higher and lower amount of grants would depend on differences
in willingness to tax and spend by different local jurisdictions. Grant
amounts would also depend on whether local governments perceive
grants as an income supplement and whether there are special factors
influencing expenditure decisions such as scale of urbanization, climate
risks, and fiscal behavior of local governments in the form of fiscal indis-
cipline and bailouts. These issues present a very complicated scenario for
countries like India with population surge, urbanization, environmental
vulnerabilities, and political economy considerations.
local governments have not shown any retaliation when state govern-
ments have expanded their expenditure at the expense of grant to local
bodies. In fact, local expenditures have reacted positively to grants. This
result is in great contrast when a similar empirical analysis was conducted
using central and state government data (see Nath, 2012). State govern-
ments have been found exhibiting retaliation by raising more resources
at the state level during the periods of rapid growth in central expen-
ditures. These tendencies support the view that fiscal boundaries of local
governments have eroded, confirming a situation analogous to the flypaper
effect of grants 1 and the fungibility of local fiscal authority. In case of the
former, local expenditures have tended to be financed more from grants
than from local governments’ own revenues. As regards fungible fiscal
authority, resource raising responsibility has tended to be shifted from
local to state government, which is not the intention of the statute. The
sluggish growth of local taxes and user charges support this trend in most
cases.
Secondly, besides fiscal handicaps, local bodies are technologically less
developed to meet the challenges of spurt in demand for local services
due to population growth and expansion in economic activities. This
has resulted in a shift of certain functions from local- to state-level
autonomous boards, typically on the ground of efficiency in performance.
Such developments are more visible in water supply and sewerage disposal
activity, and urban housing in India. Blewett (1984) argues that lower
fiscal illusion and greater accountability is attained “by separating the
functions of government and their sources of revenue. This is done by
placing general government expenditures ‘off budget’ and on to sepa-
rate special purpose budget. In effect, the proliferation of governmental
units allows for the earmarking of revenues”. Decentralization in terms
of functions has further gathered support on the grounds of economies
of scale and cost recovery. While functional decentralization has allowed
for more rational functioning in a democratic country like India, it has
occurred at the expense of fiscal decentralization where empowerment of
local governments is in focus.
Thirdly, political motivations are varied and may not originate from
efficiency and equity considerations. Off-budget activities that purely arise
from political concerns allow some local functions to be performed sepa-
rately. For instance, when conducting off-budget sales of publicly owned
assets like land to finance operating budgets. Another example is the
setting up of a special purpose vehicle (SPV) by the government to
1 EMERGING CHALLENGES IN URBAN LOCAL FINANCE 13
Fig. 1.1 Cities in relation to current climate-related hazards (Source de Sherbinin et al. [2007]. Original source data
include: (i) for cities: CIESIN [2006], Global Rural–Urban Mapping Project [GRUMP], alpha version [available from
http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw/); (ii) for hazards: Dilley et al. [2005]. Note The urban areas included in this
figure have populations greater than one million. The hazard risk represents a cumulative score based on risk of cyclones,
flooding, landslides, and drought. “0” denotes “low risk” and “10” denotes “high risk”])
1 EMERGING CHALLENGES IN URBAN LOCAL FINANCE 17
Classification Sub-category Population range Governing local authority No. of cities as per Census of
India, 2011
Note
1. The flypaper effect is a phenomenon that describes the expenditure
behaviour of a local government in response to grants from higher levels
of government. It “results when a dollar of exogenous grants-in-aid leads
to significantly greater public spending than an equivalent dollar of citizen
income: Money sticks where it hits” (Inman, 2008). The idea is that private
sector income tends to be allocated to private consumption “rather than be
taxed away” while public income from fiscal transfers tends to be spent
by the public sector “rather than being rebated back to citizens” (Vegh &
Vuletin, 2015).
References
Alesina, A., & Wacziarg, R. (1998). Openness, Country Size and Government.
Journal of Public Economics, 69(3), 305–321.
Bahl, R. W., & Nath, S. (1986). Public Expenditure Decentralization in Devel-
oping Countries. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 4(4),
405–418.
Blewett, R. A. (1984). Off Budget Activities of Local Government: A Comment.
Public Choice, 42, 205–211.
Bu, M., Lin, C. T., & Zhang, B. (2016). Globalization and Climate Change:
New Empirical Panel Data Evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(3), 577–
595.
CIESIN (Center for International Earth Science Information Network). (2006).
Global Rural-Urban Mapping Project (GRUMP), Alpha Version. http://
sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw/
Dalton, H. (1971). Principles of Public Finance. Routledge.
De Sherbinin, A., Schiller, A., & Pulsipher, A. (2007). The Vulnerability of
Global Cities to Climate Hazards. Environment and Urbanization, 19(1),
39–64.
26 S. NATH AND Y. N. MADHOO
Dilley, M., Chen, R. S., Deichmann, U., Lerner-Lam, A. L., & Arnold, M.
(2005). Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis. The World Bank.
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/chrr/research/hotspots/coredata.html
Easterly, W. (2003). Can Foreign Aid Buy Growth? Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 17 (3), 23–48.
Gangopadhyay, P., & Nath, S. (2001). Deprivation and Incidence of Urban
Public Services: A Tale of Three Cities. Review of Urban & Regional
Development Studies, 13(3), 207–220.
Garrett, G., & Rodden, J. (2003). Globalization and Fiscal Decentralization.
In M. Kahler & D. Lake (Eds.), Governance in a Global Economy: Political
Authority in Transition (pp. 87–109). Princeton University Press.
Gyourko, J., & Tracy, J. (1991). The Structure of Local Public Finance and the
Quality of Life. Journal of Political Economy, 99(4), 774–806.
Inman, R. P. (2008). The flypaper effect. NBER Working Paper, w14579.
National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Jackson, R. B., Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Korsbakken,
J. I., Liu, Z., Peters, G. P., & Zheng, B. (2018). Global Energy Growth is
Outpacing Decarbonization. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12), 120401.
Ministry of Urban Development. (2015). Urban and Regional Development
Plans Formulation and Implementation (URDPFI) Guidelines (Vol. 1). New
Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India.
Mohanty, P. K., Misra, B. M., Goyal, R., & Jeromi, P. D. (2007). Munic-
ipal Finance in India: An Assessment. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India,
Development Research Group, Study No. 26.
Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public Choice III . Cambridge University Press.
Nath, S. (2012). A Political Cost Model of Fiscal Federalism: Some Empirical
Results from Indian Federation. In D. K. Srivastava & U. Sankar (Eds.),
Development and Public Finance: Essays in Honour of Raja J. Chelliah
(pp. 98–112). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1996). Federal Fiscal Constitutions: Risk Sharing
and Redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 104(5), 979–1009.
Polychroniou, C. J., & Rolle, M. (2018). Is Globalization Responsible for
Climate Change? An Interview with Graciela Chichilniski and Helena
Norberg-Hodge. Rozenberg Quarterly Magazine. http://rozenbergquarte
rly.com/is-globalization-responsible-for-climate-change-an-interview-with-gra
ciela-chichilnisky-and-helena-norberg-hodge/
Rath, A. (2009). Octroi—A Tax in a Time Warp: What Does Its Removal Imply
for Greater Mumbai? Economic and Political Weekly, 44(25), 86–93.
Rodrik, D. (1998). Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Challenge, 41(2), 81–94.
Romero-Lankao, P., & Dodman, D. (2011). Cities in Transition: Trans-
forming Urban Centers from Hotbeds of GHG Emissions and Vulnerability
1 EMERGING CHALLENGES IN URBAN LOCAL FINANCE 27
2.1 Introduction
The economic system of a nation produces private and public goods,
which are transacted in the marketplace and provided through public and
semi-public governance channels, respectively. There are two important
and related issues to resolve with a view to understanding the properties
of private and public goods and services produced. First is that why there
is a case for public (government) provision of some goods and services.
The other is that if there is a ground for government intervention, which
government, national, or subnational at provincial and local levels should
provide it. As regards the latter question on which layer of government
should provide public goods, it will depend on the spread of the benefit
area of that good and service. If the benefit area is the whole nation, it
is called national public good, and it should be provided by the national
or central government. Alternatively, if a local jurisdiction coincides with
the benefit area, it is called local public good, and its provision should be
assigned to a local government.
The “Decentralization Theorem” formulated by Oates (1972) states
that “For a public good—the consumption of which is defined over
geographical subsets of the total population, and for which the costs of
providing each level of output of the good in each jurisdiction are the
same for the central or for the respective local government—it will always
be more efficient (or at least as efficient) for local governments to provide