Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Subm itted by
February , 2024
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM, KERALA, 686560
(SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE)
NAME OF THE FACULTY INCHARGE Dr.Babu Rajeswaran
THE PRINCIPAL
“I ‘Naveed Hassan Sakariya’, ‘PRN no. 193241910226’ hereby declare that this
submission is my own work done as part of 19 AR 09006 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
(S9), M G University B.Arch. Course and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it
contains no material previously published or written by another person or material which
has been accepted or the award of any other degree or diploma of the university or other
institute of higher learning, except where the acknowledgement has been made in text.”
Place:
Date:
I extend my heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Pratheek Sudhakaran for his invaluable guidance,
insightful suggestions, and unwavering support throughout the course of this resea rch
endeavor. His expertise and encouragement have been instrumental in shaping this work.
I would also like to express my sincere appreciation to Ar. Shibili Ali for his contributions to this
research project. His creative insights and meticulous attention to detail have enriched our
exploration and understanding of the subject matter.
Furthermore, we extend our thanks to Dr. Babu Rajeswaran for his scholarly input and valuable
feedback, which have greatly enhanced the quality and depth of our research findings.
Their collective efforts have been indispensable in the realization of this study, and I am deeply
grateful for their generous assistance and collaboration.
Finally, I extend my deepest gratitude to my family and friends for their unwavering support
and encouragement throughout this endeavor.
AIM ................................................................................................................................................6
OBJECTIVE.......................................................................................................................................6
SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................6
LIMITATION .....................................................................................................................................7
METHODOLOGY ...............................................................................................................................7
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................7
LITERATURE CASE STUDIES ................................................................................................................8
1. Tristan da Cunha ...................................................................................................................8
2. Prashant Ashoka – Casa Etérea (2020) San Miguel de Allende.....................................................9
1. Chapter One: The Paradox of Isolation: Benefits and Drawbacks................................................... 10
1.1. Potential benefits of residing in an isolated structure........................................................... 10
1.2. Potential drawbacks of isolation........................................................................................ 10
2. Chapter Two: Psychological Factors at Play in Spaces .................................................................. 10
2.1. Sensory deprivation being evoked due to Isolation .............................................................. 10
2.2. Spatial psychology and its role in influencing human behavior and perception within isolated
structures. ................................................................................................................................. 11
3. Connection to Nature.............................................................................................................. 12
3.1. Depression, Escape and Peace........................................................................................... 12
3.2. Biophilic architecture and its relevance to mental well-being in isolated settings..................... 13
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 14
References........................................................................................................................................ 14
AIM
OBJECTIVE
Review existing research on isolation and nature's impact on mental health.
Identify pros and cons of living in isolated structures based on the concepts above.
Gain a better understanding of the complex relationship between isolation and mental health.
SCOPE
We'll look at the mental and social aspects of living in isolation, both positive and negative. This includes
studying things like:
We'll focus on different types of isolated buildings, but won't get into specific designs.
METHODOLOGY
This research paper investigated the impact of isolated structures on mental well-being in architecture. To
achieve this objective, a multi-method approach was employed, incorporating various research methods to
gain a comprehensive understanding of the topic. A thorough case study analysis was conducted with varying
scales in size. Then a study between the paradoxes of isolation was conducted to analyze the advantages and
disadvantages of the social isolation effects. Then proceeded to study the effects of isolation and how spaces
can affect people. Then studying how isolation can be most beneficial where I reached to conclusion that it is
most beneficial by connecting to nature and bio philia.
INTRODUCTION
Isolated structures refer to buildings or constructions that are physically separated from other structures or
developments. These structures are typically distinct and independent, lacking direct physical connections to
surrounding buildings or infrastructure.
Over the past few years, there has been a noticeable trend where people are intentionally choosing to live
alone. Many reasons contribute to this tendency toward isolation, the most significant of which is the
increased recognition of the significance of mental health and general well-being. Many people see living
alone as a way to get away from the hectic pace and stress of city life, as well as a place to unwind and think.
Another major factor pushing people toward isolated living is their desire to get away from the urbanization
and congestion of city life. More and more people are drawn to the peace and quiet that comes from being
far from the bustle and clamor of big cities. Technological developments also have a significant role in this
trend, since even in the most remote places, access to the internet, online services, and communication tools
enable remote work, education, and other necessities.
Basically, the growing number of isolated living experiences reflects a profound shift in social norms, where
solitude is now seen as a healthy option for individual development and well-being. It is expected that this
trend will continue as people look for alternative lifestyles that put peace, a connection to nature, and a
sense of freedom above the usual pressures of life today.
Tristan da Cunha is the world's most remote inhabited island. The six-by-six-mile volcanic island of Tristan da
Cunha (the main island of an archipelago bearing the same name) sits in the remote waters of the South
Atlantic, roughly equidistant from South Africa and Brazil, and about 1,500 miles from its nearest neighbor,
the island of St. Helena. Lacking an airport, Tristan, part of a British Overseas Territory, can only be reached
by ship — a journey that lasts about a week.
Tristan, as it’s colloquially known, is currently home to about 250 British nationals, whose diverse ancestry —
made up of Scottish soldiers, Dutch seamen, Italian castaways and an American whaler — first arrived some
200 years ago. They live in “the world’s most isolated settlement of Edinburgh of the Seven Seas,” reads the
island’s website, “far from the madding crowd.”
The people inhabiting the island seem to be more at peace with themselves as they are away from the hustle
and bustle of the cities and more into the roots of nature. Moreover, there seems to be zero covid cases
reported till date, ensuring that the island isolation has some pros as they can control the outgoing and
incoming traffic. (Townsend, 2021)
Situated on the slopes of an extinct volcano in the Los Picachos highlands near the Mexican city of San Miguel
de Allende, the building is surrounded by 10,000 hectares of nature. The design was made with local
materials to be in line with the architect’s aim of “being birthed from the mountainside itself”, using volcanic
rocks collected on-site for its foundations and walls made from bricks made locally.
While the front of the house is clad in mirrors, reflecting all that surrounds it on this side, the back is made of
glass creating a theatre-like feeling as it looks out and up the valley. Mirror cladding is a popular choice for
designers and architects who are building in off-grid and isolated spaces as a way of keeping the surrounding
nature unspoiled. (Berry, 2021)
Cognitively speaking, people may feel less awake, have trouble focusing, and have a warped sense of time.
Long-term deprivation can even cause hallucinations in severe situations.
Perceptually, the remaining senses may become hypersensitive, which can cause exaggerated reactions to
small stimuli and, in severe situations, warped reality perceptions.
For those who choose to live alone, understanding the possible repercussions is essential, even though the
intensity of these impacts varies. This knowledge enables people to put plans in place to lessen these
difficulties and guarantee a successful and secure time in their preferred solitude. (Myers, 1996)
However, spatial psychology offers solutions: maximizing natural light improves mood and cognition, while
promoting social connection through shared spaces combats loneliness. Further, introducing diverse textures
and materials enhances sensory stimulation, and fostering personalization through movable furniture and
decor empowers individuals to shape their space, promoting well-being.
Recognizing individual differences is key. Tailoring spatial solutions to individual needs ensures isolated
environments support, not hinder, mental well-being and thriving. (Dayananda, 2014)
Here are three picture to tell a story of depression, escape and peace.
Biophilic architecture, centered on integrating natural elements into built spaces, plays a vital role in
enhancing mental well-being in isolated settings like offices or hospitals. In these environments, the absence
of a direct connection to nature underscores the importance of incorporating biophilic principles.
Natural features such as plants, water elements, and ample natural light have a profound impact on stress
reduction and emotional well-being. Beyond aesthetics, biophilic architecture positively influences cognitive
function, fostering improved concentration, creativity, and overall mental performance. This is particularly
significant in isolated work environments, where biophilic elements contribute to a more engaging and
conducive atmosphere for sustained focus.
Crucially, biophilic design addresses the human need for connection. By creating shared spaces that
encourage social interaction, even in isolated settings, biophilic architecture fosters a sense of community.
This connection is pivotal for mental well-being, countering the potential negative effects of isolation.
(Zhong, 2021)
The findings highlight the crucial role of architecture in mitigating the negative impacts of isolation and
fostering positive mental well-being. By incorporating principles like maximizing natural light, promoting
social connection through design, and integrating biophilic elements, architects can create isolated structures
that support, rather than hinder, mental health.
However, it's important to remember that one size does not fit all. Individual differences in personality,
coping mechanisms, and social needs play a significant role in how individuals respond to isolation.
Therefore, architects and designers must strive to understand the specific needs and preferences of users
and create flexible and adaptable spaces that cater to diverse experiences and preferences.
Looking forward, further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of isolated living, particularly in
the context of increasingly urban environments. Additionally, integrating advanced technologies that
facilitate social interaction and connection to nature within isolated structures holds great potential for
future exploration and development.
References
Berry, C. (2021, April 23). Isolated spaces. Retrieved from uxdesign.cc: https://uxdesign.cc/isolated-spaces-
85c0773c5740
Dayananda, N. (2014). Spatial psychology in dwellings: a study on dimensions and colour. Kent: University of
Kent.
Myers, T. I. (1996). Experimental Studies of Sensory Deprivation and Social Isolation. California: Office, Chief
of Research and Development of the Army.
Townsend, S. (2021, January 20). Marine Management Organisation. Retrieved from Marine developments.
Weir, K. (2020, April 1). Nurtured by nature. Retrieved from American Psychological Association:
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2020/04/nurtured-nature
Zhong, W. (2021). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and
sustainability: A critical review. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.