Professional Documents
Culture Documents
APPROVAL
The signatures below certify that this procedure has been reviewed and accepted and demonstrates that the
signatories are aware of all the requirements contained herein and are committed to ensuring their provision.
Prepared by
Reviewed by
Approved by
AMENDMENT RECORD
This procedure is reviewed to ensure its continuing relevance to the systems and process that it describes. A
record of contextual additions or omissions is given below:
The electronic version of this procedure is the latest revision. It is the responsibility of the individual to ensure
that any paper material is the current revision. The printed version of this manual is uncontrolled, except
when provided with a document reference number and revision in the field below:
Table of Content
s
1 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION & ASSESSMENT..............................................................................................3
1.1.2 References
Standard Title ISO Clauses Manual Sections
BS EN ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems N/a N/a
BS EN ISO 14001:2015 Environmental management systems N/a N/a
BS EN ISO 45001:2018 OH&S management systems 6.1.2.1, 6.1.3
When a hazard is observed, they are required to take steps to manage that hazard directly (provided they are
competent and trained to safely do so) to eliminate the hazard or to get assistance from appropriate persons
to do so whenever reasonably possible.
By Select a work process, work area or specific activity and identify hazards. Review documentation such as
inspection reports, illness/injury reports, Health and Safety Committee minutes, policies and procedures,
inventory reports, safe operating procedures, checklists, job descriptions and routines, etc. Walk through the
work area and observe the practice and talk to the workers who do the job in the area.
List the potential hazards or incidents that could happen while doing a process or task. A hazard is
something with the potential to cause harm or injury. Formulas in the register will automatically rate the
hazards according to the severity and likelihood scores. Hazards rated as 'Moderate' and 'Major' are
considered significant and are prioritized for risk assessment in order to determine and implement
appropriate controls.
Impact Exposure
Exposure Timeframe for
Management Control Action (MCA)
MCA
Act immediately to mitigate the risk. Either eliminate, substitute or implement
engineering control measures. Remove the hazard at the source. An identified
Major Immediate
very high risk does not allow scope for the use of administrative controls, even
in the short term.
It provides the necessary assurances that any hazards identified during management system planning and
operational planning activities are captured and effectively managed. The Hazard Identification Register is
maintained by the QEHS Manager and is reported to Top management on a monthly basis and is used as the
input to Risk Assessment process.
All business activities are assessed to ensure that any changes to processes and operations do not result in
adverse health and safety hazards. On occasions where your organization does not have a degree of control
or influence over the hazard or risk, its details are escalated to the Risk Register for Top management action.
This is carried out through a series of risk assessments targeted at individual working conditions and
operational hazards. To ensure the process is thorough, the Health & Safety Advisor and the Supervisor
ensure they:
1. Review all aspects and hazards associated with the of the work areas and activities performed;
2. Review non-routine activities such as maintenance, repair, cleaning and emergency response;
3. Review all incident and near-miss records;
4. Consider people who work ‘off site’, either at home, on other premises and drivers, etc.;
5. Look at the way the work is organized or ‘done’;
6. Assess the experience and age of workers and contractors doing the work and systems being used;
7. Assess foreseeable, unusual conditions such as the possible impact on hazard control procedures
that may be unavailable in an emergency situation or power failure;
8. Examine risks to visitors or the public, and other interested parties;
9. Assess groups of people that may present a different level of risk such as young or inexperienced
workers, persons with disabilities, or new or expectant mothers.
To identify potential hazards, the following questions should be asked (this is not a complete list):
1. Can any body part get caught in or between objects?
2. Do tools, machines or equipment present any hazards?
3. Can an employee make harmful contact with objects?
4. Can an employee slip, trip or fall?
5. Can an employee suffer a strain from lifting, pushing or pulling?
Workers play an important role in the assessment process. Being the ‘hands-on’ people, they are more aware
of potential or actual hazards.
Likelihood (S2)
Likelihood Rating
Score Likelihood
Description Percentage Probability
1 Rare May only occur in exceptional circumstances <0.1% 1 in 1,000
2 Unlikely Could occur during a specified time period 1% 1 in 100
3 Possible Might occur within a given time period 10% 1 in 10
4 Likely Will probably occur in most circumstances 50% 1 in 2
5 Certain Expected to occur in most circumstances >95% 1 in 1
Severity (S3)
Severity of Impact
Score Impact
Degree of Harm
1 Minor Minor injury not requiring first aid or no apparent injury/adverse outcome, near miss
2 Moderate Temporary minor injury/illness/first aid treatment needed, referral to A&E or GP
3 Serious Semi-permanent injury, over 3-day reportable injury. RIDDOR reportable
4 Major Major injury, or long-term incapacity/semi-permanent injury, hospital >/= 3-day absence
5 Catastrophic Death or major permanent incapacity. Multiple fatalities. Multiple permanent disabilities
Take reasonable steps to mitigate and monitor the risk. Institute permanent
3 to 4 Low controls in the long term. Permanent controls may be administrative in nature 1 year
if the hazard has low frequency, rare likelihood and insignificant consequence.
Impact Exposure
Score Exposure
Management Control Action (MCA) Timeframe
Act immediately to mitigate the risk. Either eliminate, substitute or implement
engineering control measures. If these controls are not immediately accessible,
set a timeframe for their implementation and establish interim risk reduction
10 to 17 High Immediate
strategies for the period of the set timeframe. An achievable time frame must
be established to ensure that elimination, substitution or engineering controls
are implemented.
Act immediately to mitigate the risk. Either eliminate, substitute or implement
Very engineering control measures. Remove the hazard at the source. An identified
20 to 25 Immediate
High very high risk does not allow scope for the use of administrative controls, even
in the short term.
Once the risks have been identified they are prioritised in terms of their impact upon the health and safety of
our workers, each risk is assigned a significance rating to indicate the relative potential for harm. The impact
rating is used to define those risks which are to be controlled through objectives and targets, or by the
implementation of operational control procedures. The Health & Safety Advisors engage with our Workers
and Process Owners to:
1. Identify the control measures already applied to each risk, i.e. existing control measures. These may
be pro-active (reducing the probability) or reactive (reducing the impact);
2. Rank the probability of each risk occurring, after taking into account the actual effectiveness of the
existing control measures;
3. Enter the existing control measures and the associated current impact scores;
4. Undertake a risk assessment to provide more detailed understanding of the risk’s consequences;
5. Set objectives and targets for achieving impact mitigation.
By assigning a priority to the hazards and creating a ranking for an action list. The following factors play an
important role:
1. Percentage of workforce exposed;
2. Frequency of exposure;
3. Degree of harm likely to result from the exposure;
4. Probability of occurrence.
There is no one simple or single way to determine the level of risk. Ranking hazards requires the knowledge
of the workplace activities, urgency of situations, and most importantly, objective judgment.
Severity and likelihood estimations are established giving due consideration to the effectiveness of existing
control measures.
Risk treatment involves identifying the options for treating each risk, evaluating those options, assigning
accountability (for Very High, High and Moderate impacts) and taking relevant action. The following
options from the hierarchy of controls are available for treating impacts and may be applied individually or in
combination:
The Health & Safety Advisors review the hazard assessments as part of their routine work to ensure that the
assessments are continually relevant to all organizational activities.
Regular reports are necessary to inform and provide assurance to Top management and other key
stakeholders, that health and safety hazards are being appropriately managed. Reporting must be based on
current data captured in the Health & Safety Risk Assessments, which must be reviewed in good time for the
next reporting cycle.
1.4.5 Monitoring
Continuous systematic and formal monitoring of implementation of the health and safety assessment
process and outputs take place against appropriate performance indicators to ensure process compliance
and effectiveness. Monitoring takes a variety of forms and range from self-assessment, inspections and
internal audits, to detailed reviews by independent external experts.
1.4.6 Escalation
On occasion, it may be appropriate to escalate a health and safety risk to ensure it is assessed and/or
managed by the person or party best placed to do so (able and with appropriate authority). For example,
where a more substantial or coordinated response is required than the current Process Owner can authorise
or implement will justify higher level assessment and/or management. The QEHS Manager will, as
appropriate:
1. Escalate through established lines of management accountability all hazards and risk that may
require mitigation;
2. This may take place during formal reviews, or through other simple mechanisms at management
meetings;
3. Issue reports in accordance with requirements;
4. Provide key information such as statistical data on numbers of active hazards, unassessed risks,
overdue actions, and others as appropriate.
1.5 Training
Once the control has been put into place, our workers are trained or made aware of it. Training and
awareness records, and documented sign-offs are retained to demonstrate that our workers have been made
aware of the hazards and the controls. Where hazards cannot be eliminated immediately, workers are trained
and empowered to take the necessary steps to warn others of the hazard.
This applies whether it is an engineering control such as a machine guard or safety interlock, an
administrative control such as a safe work procedure for cold weather or particular PPE when handling a
chemical. Hazardous or potentially hazardous conditions and acts are reported to the Health & Safety
Advisor and the Supervisor if detected by a workers, visitor or contractor.
Undertake standard
operational control.
(6.1.5, 8.1 & 8.8) No
Formulate
Compliant?
controls
(6.1.5)
Yes
Implement solutions
and evaluate residual
risk after control (8.1 &
8.8)