Sr Title /Themes Methodology Theoretical Data Analysis RQ Conclusion Problem Gap

No (Use keywords) Sampling/Population/ framework tools (Use keywords) (List key (Read (Read
Research design/ etc (Use keywords) findings) statement of conclusion/
problem Recommendation
section
Learner Conceptualizing the Scherer (1995) Thematic Individual Environment Limited Insufficient
1 Characteristics agent and environment Lewis (2005) analysis Differences. influences understanding consideration of
and Learning Buck (2005) Learner learning. of Language social contexts.
Environment Characteristics. Situated Learning Consider social
Complex cognition is Processes. context.
adaptive important. Neglect of Interdisciplinary
systems. Complex environmental research is
adaptive factors crucial.
systems Use dynamic and
perspective is situated
essential. approaches.
2
Characteristics of Cross sectional survey Self Descriptive Language Autonomy. Limited Limited
English Language design. Determination statistics. Proficiency. LAE Learners understanding. understanding of
Learners Population: English major Theory of Deci Frequency Technology Implications Characteristics EFL learners.
university in Turkey and Ryan (1985, Analysis. engagement. unknown. Lack of effective
2017) Digital tools. Effective strategies.
Learner Profiles Strategies Neglect of
lacking Learner
autonomy.
3
Learner Qualitative. Factor Analysis Learner Learning Learner Teaching and
Characteristics Self-selection sampling. Descriptive centered environment Diversity learning gap
Exploratory sequential statistics approach. design Ineffective Limited
mixed methods research Learning Face-to-face teaching understanding of
environment interaction and strategies learner
preferences direct support Poor student characteristics
for learners engagement and preferences
who prefer it
4 Learners’ Mixed-methods Hockings (2010) Factor Analysis Learner Four Learner Differing Limited
Inclination approach Creswell and Cluster Analysis Characteristics characteristics perceptions generalizability
towards Exploratory sequential Creswell (2018) Descriptive Learning Implications for Effectiveness Need for further
Particular mixed methods Kickul and Kickul Statistics environment learning and Learning exploration of
Learning (2006) Inclination teaching environments learner
Environments characteristics
Lack of
investigation into
learning
outcomes
5 The Relationship Quantitative research Statistical How do learner Learner beliefs Learner Limited research,
Between English design methods characteristics positively characteristics unclear
Language Learner Survey questionnaire relate to online predict online Online self- relationships,
Characteristics Online data collection self-regulation self-regulation. regulation need for
and Online Self- in English Learner anxiety English investigation
Regulation language negatively language
learning predicts online learning
self-regulation
6 Adult Language Quantitative research Descriptive Language Adult language Language Limited
Learning approach statistical proficiency learning is training understanding of
Descriptive and software Adult language challenging. challenges adult language
exploratory research Data learning Current Language learning
design visualization Policy language requirement Inadequate
Population: Adult tools implications training Communication language training
Language learners programs have effectiveness programs
limitations Lack of cultural
awareness and
understanding
7 The Good Qualitative research Thematic Good language Key Second Limited
Language Learner approach analysis learner characteristics language understandi
Revisited Data analysis Theme Characteristics The good acquisition. effective lan
Population: population of identification Effective language Effective learning
interest is second language learner language strategies.
language learners learning implications learning. Need for mo
 effective lan
teaching pra
Insufficient
attention to
world langu
8 Learner Methodology: Literature Cognitivism:
characteristics in Review John Piaget
instructional Social Learning
design Theory : Albert
Bandura

10

11 .

12
13

14