Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gati Inference - MBA09151
Gati Inference - MBA09151
Xbar Chart
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Upon initial observation, the process appears to be well-contained within the upper and lower
control limits. However, there is a noticeable pattern in which the process consistently veers
either above the control line (mean) and towards the upper control limit (UCL), or below the
control line and towards the lower control limit (LCL). This recurring variability indicates the
presence of common cause (random) variation and warrants further investigation.
The GATI process meets the design specifications with Cp=1, indicating it can consistently
produce within those bounds. Additionally, Cpk equals Cp, signifying that the process is
centred. Nevertheless, to enhance process performance, management must address common
cause variations or consider process redesign to narrow the design specifications. The aim is
to boost the process capability (Cpk) beyond 1.
Q3. Explain what can be done to identify the major causes of delay in the shipment.
By employing various quality management tools, we can enhance our problem-solving and
process improvement efforts:
This graph clearly indicates that the primary cause of delay was:
Following closely, the second major contributor to delivery delays was: 2. The absence of
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP).
And thirdly, a notable factor leading to delivery delays was: 3. Delays in the loading and
unloading processes.