Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3082728?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
American Association for the Advancement of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Science
(p
dered spheres (maximum packing 4 - 0.64),
us to measure the three-dimensional arrange-
ment of colloidal particles in suspension (21,
and thus, the entropy is higher in the crystalline
state. The phase behavior is determined solely
22). We observed a 58 ,Im by 55 pxm by 20 txm A
-0. ..b * .. .
volume, containing -4000 particles. The total
by the volume fraction (), with freezing occur- 2 10
<r>la
ring at f4)S = 0.494 and melting occurring volume
at of our samples was -50 dLI, and they
4HS = 0.545 (HS, hard sphere) (12). Weakly contained a short piece of paramagnetic wire, Fig. 2. The difference pg -Ps of the probabilities
which we agitated with a magnet to shear melt with which a crystallite is growing or shrinking
charged colloids behave in essentially the same
plotted against the normalized average crystal-
Fig. 1. Four snapshotsA lite radius (r)/a (bottom) and the number of
during crystallization particles M in the crystallite (top) for ( = 0.47.
The size of the critical nucleus lies in the range
of a sample with () =
0.45. The red spheres in which Pg - P goes from negative to positive
values.
are drawn to scale and
represent particles
that were identified as
Table 1. The experimentally measured bond-order
crystal-like. The parti-
cles in the metastable histograms for the crystal regions were least
liquid state are shown squares fit with the histograms for crystals and
by the blue spheres, liquid. For three samples, the fraction of each
reduced in size for structure type found by the fit is given, with the
sum of all the fractions constrained to be 1. The
clarity. (A) Time t =
20 min after shear I values in parentheses are the uncertainty of the
melting, (B) t = 43 last digit. The sum of the squared differences
between the measurement and the fit, A2, is a
min, (C) t = 66 min,
and (D) t = 89 min. measure for the quality of the fit, with smaller
values indicating a better fit. The fit for the ) =
0.45 sample is shown in Fig. 4.
i \ <. . ' .
(blue curves), hcp (red 103 . . . v
curves), bcc (black 0.04 -
curves), and liquid
(purple curves). (B) The
measured bond-order
histograms (black plots)
of a sample with 4) = 2: . \ * 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55.
0.45 are shown togeth-
2lo,it 0.03-
101 X
er with a least squares
\ * - *
fit (blue curve) using B loi ~\. . .
the bond-order histo- 10? \ * ** '* *
grams from (A). The re- 0 200 400 600 800
sults of this and other
A (pm2)
structure fits are sum-
marized in Table 1. Fig. 5. The number of nuclei N(A) (circles) is
shown as a function of the nucleus surface area
A approximated by an ellipsoid (4 = 0.445).
From the fit (line) with the function N(A) =
constant-exp[-Ay/(kBT)], the surface tension
y = 0.026kBT/a2 is determined. The values of -y
for all samples are given in the inset as a
W6 function of 4.
ellipsoid
surface of the crystallite and haveaxesat was
leastnever higher than 0.65 4.? S. Alexander, J. P. McTague, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 702
(1978).
one crystal-like bond with a red
0.15 for particle.
nuclei of all sizes. This suggests that
5. P. R. ten Wolde, M. J. Ruiz-Montero, D. Frenkel,
The cores of the crystalline thenuclei are
effects of the nonspherical shape could beJ. Chem. Phys. 104, 9932 (1996).
formed from hexagonal layers,included in any future
as shown by modification of the6. P. N. Pusey, W. van Megen, Nature 320, 340 (1986).
7. P. N. Pusey et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2753 (1989).
the cut through the center of theory.
this crystallite
Furthermore, we found that the radius
8. J. Zhu et al., Nature 387, 883 (1997).
(Fig. 3D), and their surfaces ofare more
gyration dis-
rg of crystallites was related to the
9. S. Auer, D. Frenkel, Nature 409, 1020 (2001).
ordered. The interface between theofhighly
number particles M within each crystallite
10. P. N. Pusey, in Liquids, Freezing and the Glass Transi-
ordered cores and the amorphous rgf with the fractal dimension tion, D. Leveesque, J. P. Hansen, J. Zinn-Justin, Eds.
as M(rg) ocliquid
(Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991), pp. 763-942.
df = 2.35in
exterior is not sharp; this decrease + 0.15 for all values of (; the
order 11. A. K. Sood, in Solid State Physics, H. Ehrenbach, D.
fractal
from the interior to the exterior is behavior
in agree-presumably reflects the Turnbull, Eds. (Academic Press, Boston, 1991), vol. 45,
ment with computer simulations ofofatheir
roughness Len- surfaces. pp. 1-73.
The interfacial tension between the 12. B. J. Alder, W. G. Hoover, D. A. Young, J. Chem. Phys.
nard-Jones system (5) and density function- 49, 3688 (1968).
al calculations for hard spheres (32).
crystal and fluid phases is a key parameter
13. K. Schatzel, B. J. Ackerson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 337
To determine the crystal structure the nucleation process, yet(1992).
of the
that controls y is
14. P. Bartlett, R. H. Ottewill, P. N. Pusey, Phys. Rev. Lett.
ordered cores, we used the rotational in-
difficult to calculate (1, 2) and to measure
68, 3801 (1992).
variants q4(i), q6(i), and w6(i) (33), whichbut with our data,15.we
experimentally, Y. He,can
B. J. Ackerson, W. van Megen, S. M. Underwood,
are quantitative measures for the local
directly measure or-y by examining the statis- K. Schatzel, Phys. Rev. E 54, 5286 (1996).
der around particle i, and distinguished tics of the smallest be- nuclei. For r < 16. rc,B. J. Ackerson, K. Schatzel, Phys. Rev. E 52, 6448
the
(1995).
tween fcc, hcp, bcc, and liquid surface (5, term
9, 24). in Eq. 1 dominates the free
17. S.-T. Yau, P. G. Vekilov, Nature 406, 494 (2000).
Because of thermal fluctuations, energy even ho-crystallites, and consequent-
of the 18. L. Anti et al., Colloids Surf. 17, 67 (1986).
19. S.-E. Phan et al., Phys. Rev. E 54, 6633 (1996).
mogeneous crystals have a distribution ly, we expect the ofnumber of crystallites to
20. We determined the particle radius by measuring the
these parameters. Nevertheless, be N(A) theseoc exp[-Ay/(kBT)],
dis- where A is the
volume per particle at random close packing (,rcp =
tributions are distinct for surface every area, crystal which we approximate by anrhcp (crhcp = 0.74) with the microscope.
0.64) and
structure, as shown by the calculations ellipsoid. In Fig. (34)5, we show that thisWepro- obtained the same particle radius from these two
points in phase space; therefore, we used this radius
in Fig. 4A. These are compared portionality
to measure- does indeed hold, allowing us ) of all other samples from the mea-
to calculate
ments of experimental crystalline nuclei,to obtain values for the surface tension. As sured volume per particle.
21. A. van Blaaderen, P. Wiltzius, Science 270, 1177
shown by a black curve in Fig. shown 4B. in the The
inset, /y w 0.027kBT/a2 and
(1995).
blue curve is a least squaresmay fitdecrease
with slightly
the with increasing22.( E. R. Weeks, J. C. Crocker, A. C. Levitt, A. Schofield,
values.
distributions from Fig. 4A, and the fit pa- This value of y is in reasonable D. A. Weitz, Science 287, 627 (2000).
rameters are summarized in Table 1. Dur- agreement with density functional calcula- 23. J. C. Crocker, D. G. Grier,J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179,
298 (1996).
ing the nucleation process, bcc ordertions is for hard spheres and Lennard-Jones 24. P. J. Steinhardt, D. R. Nelson, M. Ronchetti, Phys. Rev.
completely absent; in particular, as shown
systems (32). By contrast, an older densityB 28, 784 (1983).
in Fig. 4, the q4 distribution for bccfunctional
is study (35) and computer simula- 25. The normalized order parameter q, (i) of particle i has
(21 + 1) complex components
markedly different from the measuredtions dis- of hard spheres (9, 36) gave results B(i)
approximately
tribution. Instead, the main contributions to four times as large. Our
qtm(i) = NB(i) a()
measurement of a low value of y is consis-
the structure of the experimental crystalline j=l
nuclei are due to fcc, hcp, and liquid. tent
The with the observed rough surfaces of thewhere N is a normalization factor such that
mixture of fcc and hcp is the signature of
crystallites; this may reflect the effects of ,mlm(i)qtm(i) = 1, B(i) is the number of neighbors
rhcp structure and is consistent withthe thesofter potential due to the weak chargesof particle i, Pr is the unit vector pointing from
particle i to its jth neighbor, and Ylm is a spherical
stacked hexagonal planes in Fig. 3D. The of our particles. Approximating the criticalharmonic function. Two particles are defined as
liquid contribution in the fit is mainlynucleus
due as an ellipsoid, with M, 110, we neighbors if their separation is smaller than a cutoff
to the surface of the crystallites. Theseobtain Ac = 880 Lxm2, AL - 0.13kBT, andvalue of 2.83a, chosen to be close to the minimum
between the first and second peaks of the pair
AG(AC) 7.4kBT.
results are in agreement with those expect-
correlation function g(r) for our samples. The "bond"
ed for hard spheres, which also crystallize The direct observation of the structure, between two neighboring particles i and j is recog-
in the rhcp structure (7), confirming dynamics,
that and evolution of small crystalline nized as crystal-like if the complex inner product
the critical nuclei are formed only from nuclei
the allowed us to characterize the key r,mqm(i)mtm(j) exceeds a threshold value of 0.5. As
in other studies (5, 9), we used the I = 6 order
bulk solid phase, rather than forming from
processes of nucleation and growth of colloi- parameter.
a different metastable solid phase. dal crystals and to quantitatively determine 26. In this context, "bond" denotes the direction that
30.
30.K. Schatzel,
K. Schatzel,
B. J. Ackerson,
B. Phys.
J. Ackerson,
Rev. E 48, 3766 Phys. Rev.
w,(i) aE
w,(i)is is a 48,
third-order3766
third-orderrotational
rotational
invariant defined by defined by calculated
invariant calculatedin
inthe
thesame
samewayway as as
forforparticle
particle
positions
positions
(1993). from
from aa measurement.
measurement. The
Theliquid
liquid
histogram
histogram was was
taken
taken
31. J. L. Harland, W. van Megen, Phys. Rev. E 55 3054 w(i) = m,,m2,m3E (m1 m2 m/3 from
from observations
observationsshortly
shortly after
after
shear
shear
melting,
melting,
when
when
(1997). mn + m2 + m3 = O Ml lm l0 the
the sample
samplewaswasininthe
the
liquid
liquidstate.
state.
32. R. Ohnesorge, H. Lbwen, H. Wagner, Phys. Rev. E 50, 35.
35. D.
D. W.
W.Marr,
Marr,A.A.P.P.
Gast,
Gast,Phys.
Phys.Rev.
Rev.E 47,
E 47,
12121212
(1993).
(1993).
4801 (1994). x q,m,(i)qm,,2(i)qtm3(i) 36.
36. R.
R. L.
L. Davidchack,
Davidchack,B.B.
B. B.
Laird,
Laird,
Phys.
Phys.
Rev.
Rev.
Lett.
Lett.
85, 4751
85, 4751
33. q,(i) is a second-order rotational invariant of the where (:::) stands for a Wigner 3j symbol. (2000).
(21 + 1)-component bond-order parameter q,(i) for 34. The histograms for fcc, bcc, and hcp order were 37. This work was supported by NSF (grant
particle i and is defined by obtained from computer-generated crystal data. Ran- DMR-9971432) and NASA (grant NAG3-2284). U.G.
dom fluctuations were added to the particle positions also acknowledges support by the Swiss National
4,T in such a way that the width of the first peak of g(r) Science Foundation.
ql(i) = 21 +-m= I- Jq,,(i) for the computer-generated data matched the exper-
imental value. The bond-order histograms were then 20 December 2000; accepted 28 February 2001
Capturing
Capturinga aPhotoexcited
Photoexcited
catalysis,
catalysis, and
and the
thephotoinduced
photoinducedredox
redoxreactions.
reactions.
According
According toto previous
previousstudies
studies(20-22)
(20-22)inina a
weakly
weakly coordinating
coordinatingorornoncoordinating
noncoordinating sol-
sol-
Molecular
MolecularStructure
StructureThrough
Through square
square planar
planar geometry
geometryofofNiTPP
NiTPPadopt
adopta sin-
a sin-
vent,
vent, the
the 3d8
3d8 electrons
electronsof
ofthe
theNi(II)
Ni(II)ion
ioninin
the
the
Time-Domain
Time-DomainX-ray
X-rayAbsorption
Absorption glet
glet spin
trons
spin state
trons in
state (3dz2)2,
in the
(3dz2)2,SO,
the octahedral
SO,whereas
whereasthese
octahedralgeometry
theseelec-
elec-
geometryofofNiTPP-L2
NiTPP-L2
Fine Structure prefer
prefer the
the triplet
tripletspin
spinstate
state3(3d,2_2,
3(3d,2_2,3dz2),
3dz2),To.
To.
This
This difference
difference reflects
reflectsthe
theresponse
responseofof
the
the