Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (2020).

SIPRI Yearbook:
Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. SIPRI. [online] Available at:
https://milex.sipri.org/sipri [Accessed 15 Mar. 2024]
Starburst. (2023). The Rise in Dual-Use Technologies: A Paradigm Shift. [online] Available
at: https://starburst.aero/news/the-rise-in-dual-use-technologies/ [Accessed 4 Apr. 2024].
Schwartz, M. S. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility. Routledge.

Sandler, T., & Hartley, K. (1995). The economics of defense. Cambridge University Press.

Dunne, J. P. (1995). The defense industrial base. In Hartley, K. & Sandler, T. (Eds.),
Handbook of Defense Economics, Vol. 1. Elsevier Science.

Serfati, C. (2008). Financial dimensions of transnational corporations, global value chain and
technological innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, (2), 35-61.

Busch, T., & Friede, G. (2018). The robustness of the corporate social and financial
performance relation: A second-order meta-analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 25(4), 583-608.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated
evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance &
Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
Schramade, W. (2016). Integrating ESG into valuation models and investment decisions: the
value-driver adjustment approach. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6(2), 95-111.
Regeringskansliet, R. och (2023). Regeringens budgetsatsningar på det militära området 2024.
[online] Regeringskansliet. Available at:
https://www.regeringen.se/artiklar/2023/09/regeringens-budgetsatsningar-pa-det-militara-
omradet-2024/.
European Commission (2023). EDF Developing tomorrow’s defence capabilities. [online]
Available at: https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/eu-defence-industry/european-
defence-fund-edf-official-webpage-european-commission_en.
Fernando Almeida (2018). Strategies to perform a mixed methods study. European Journal of
Education Studies, [online] 5(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1406214.
Robson, (2005). Real World Research, Second edition. Blackwell Publishing
Eriksson, Päivi & Kovalainen, Anne. (2016). Qualitative Methods in Business Research.
10.4135/9780857028044.
Merton, R. K., & Kendall, P. L. (1946). The focused interview. American journal of
Sociology, 51(6), 541-557. Merton, R., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. (1990). The focused
interviews: a manual of problems and procedures 2nd edition. Free press.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. [online] Qualitative
Research In Psychology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Patton, M. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. [online] SAGE Publications
Inc. Available at: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/
book232962.
Joffe, H. (2011). Thematic Analysis. In D. Harper, & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative
Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy A Guide for Students and
Practitioners, Chichester John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. - References - Scientific Research
Publishing. [online] Available at: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?
referenceid=1516232.
Sagepub.com. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis - SAGE Research Methods. [online]
Available at: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/applied-thematic-analysis.
Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E. and Moules, N.J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving
to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, [online]
16(1), pp.1–13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.
Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-
Researchers (2nd ed.). Oxford Blackwell Publishers Ltd. - References - Scientific Research
Publishing. [online] Available at: https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?
ReferenceID=1599482.
Merton, R. K., & Kendall, P. L. (1946). The Focused Interview. American Journal of
Sociology, 51(6), 541–557. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2770681
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. [online] Qualitative
Research In Psychology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Patton, M. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. [online] SAGE Publications
Inc. Available at: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/
book232962.
our world in data (2023). Democracy Index. [online] Our World in Data. Available at:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/democracy-index-eiu.
Vision Of Humanity (2023). Global Peace Index. [online] Vision of Humanity. Available at:
https://www.visionofhumanity.org/maps/#/.
eda.europa.eu. (n.d.). Defence Data Portal. [online] Available at:
https://eda.europa.eu/publications-and-data/defence-data.
Pieroni, L. (2009). Does Defence Expenditure Affect Private Consumption? Evidence from
the United States. Economic Modelling, 26(6), 1300-1309
https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v26y2009i6p1300-1309.html
Laopodis, N. (2001). Effects of Government Spending on Private Investment. Applied
Economics, 33(13), 1563-1577. https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v33y2001i12p1563-
1577.html
Barro, R., & de Rugy, V. (2013). Defense spending and the economy. Mercatus Center,
George Mason University.
Dissanayake, R., Wu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2021). Military Spending Shocks and Private Sector
Innovation. Political Economy: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3082217
Moretti, E., Steinwender, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2021). The intellectual spoils of war? Defense
R&D, productivity, and international spillovers. Journal of Political Economy, 129(11),
https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26483/w26483.pdf
Mowery, D. C. (2012). Defense-related R&D as a model for 'Grand Challenges' technology
policies. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733312002181
Peng, J. (2017). Innovation In The Defense Industry: An Analysis Of Budget Spending &
Early-Stage Ventures. Joseph Wharton Scholars. University of Pennsylvania
ScholarlyCommons. Available at http://repository.upenn.edu/joseph_wharton_scholars/34
Molas-Gallart, J., & Sinclair, T. (1999). From technology generation to technology transfer:
the concept and reality of the "Dual-Use Technology Centres." Technovation, 19(11), 661–
671. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497299000632
Molas-Gallart, J. (1997). Which way to go? Defence technology and the diversity of 'dual-use'
technology transfer. Research Policy, 26(3),
367-385.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733397000231
Lu, W.-M., Kweh, Q. L., Nourani, M., & Huang, F.-W. (2016). Evaluating the efficiency of
dual-use technology development programs from the R&D and socio-economic perspectives.
Omega, 62, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.011
Gholz, E., & Sapolsky, H. M. (2000). Restructuring the U.S. Defense Industry. International
Security, 24(3), 5–51. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/6/article/447688/summary
Denning, T., & Seckler, E. (2021). Private capital crucial for defense innovation. National
Defense, 105(810), 22-23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/27092604
Jerald S. Howe Jr., Samuel W. Jack. The Journal of Private Equity, Vol. 18, No. 4 (FALL
2015), pp. 40-45 (6 pages) https://www.jstor.org/stable/43958593
Berteau, D., Levy, R., Ben-Ari, G., & Moore, C. (2011). Defense Industry Access to Capital
Markets: Wall Street and the Pentagon, An Annotated Brief. Center for Strategic &
International Studies.
Mahoney, C. W. (2019). Acquire or Expire: Publicly Traded Defense Contractors, Financial
Markets, and Consolidation in the U.S. Defense Industry. Defence and Peace Economics.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2019.1667216
Causevic, A., Beslik, S., & Causevic, S. (2022). Quo vadis sustainable finance: Why
defensive weapons should never be classified as an ESG investment. Journal of Sustainable
Finance & Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2135965
Mitkow, S., Antczak, J., & Roszkiewicz, M. (2022). Challenges for the Defense Industry
Against the Background of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) Concepts. European
Research Studies Journal, 25(4), 177-194.
Halper, J., Shriver, T., & Balakrishnan, J. (2022). "Defense Stocks" Highlight Challenges in
Navigating Sustainability Taxonomies. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate
Governance. Retrieved from https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/06/06/defense-stocks-
highlight-challenges-in-navigating-sustainability-taxonomies/
Sustainalytics. (2014). Aerospace & Defence Sector Profile. Long Finance. Retrieved from
https://www.longfinance.net/media/documents/sustainalytics_aerospacedefence_2014.pdf
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts,
evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
Phillips, R. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479-502.
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2022). Stakeholder theory, strategy, and organization: Past,
present, and future. Strategic Organization, 20(4), 797-809.
Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance.
Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97-124.
Barney, J., & Harrison, J. (2018). Stakeholder theory at the crossroads. Business & Society,
59(2), 203-212.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics.
Crane, A., & Ruebottom, T. (2010). Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking
stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 77-87.
Fassin, Y. (2012). Stakeholder management, reciprocity and stakeholder responsibility.
Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 83-96.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts,
evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business
Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival,
reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics.
Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder
theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Connolly, T., Conlon, E. J., & Deutsch, S. J. (1980). Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-
constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 211-217.
Dossi, A., & Patelli, L. (2010). Stakeholder happiness as a new approach to stakeholder
theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 293-307.
Scherer, A. G., & Patzer, M. (2011). The value of corporate political connections in the United
States. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(1), 106-127.
Deiner, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness
and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology
(pp. 63-73). Oxford University Press.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary
review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance.
Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97-124.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010).
Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press.
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2022). Stakeholder theory, strategy, and organization: Past,
present, and future. Strategic Organization, 20(4), 797-809.
Crane, A., & Ruebottom, T. (2011). Stakeholder theory and social identity: Rethinking
stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 77-87.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics.
Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts,
evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.

PAGE 42 ABOVE