Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Pro
2. Wh
3. The
4. Ste
obs
No
Third Party Doctrine?
(i.e. bank records)
Yes
No/NA
No
Then no search!
oximity of the area to the home
hether the area is an enclosure near the home
e nature of the uses of the area
eps taken to protect the area from outside
servation
Yes
No/NA
No
Then no search!
Yes, a search!
No
In container?
Was the vehicle *Note: no longer need
(1) readily probable cause to No Yes/NA
No mobile AND (2) search container within
expectation of // whole car to search
privacy less? without warrant
UNLESS locked (?)
use
e
basis
ral,
r
was it
ase basis)
Did the 3rd party:
1. Have common Yes
authority over
premises
2. AND give permission No/Not enough
when nonconsenting Yes
person was absent
No
IF no authority,
If defendant
were the police
was physically
reasonable in
present and
believing that the
denied consent,
person had
authority? then invalid
No
Yes
Yes No
NO Yes
Yes
NO
Valid Search
Elements of Valid Terry Stop:
1. Seizure (stop)
a. Reasonable suspicion
(can't just be a hunch) to
believe that
b. Criminal activity is afoot
2. Search (frisk)
a. Reasonable suspicion to
believe that the individual
ningful interference with an is
nterests in that property b. Armed
gives permission, then ok!) c. AND (presently)
dangerous
3. Officer may check outer
clothing of person for weapons
Yes No
No Did this fall under the Plain View & Touch Doctrin
1. Incident to a lawful search
2. Item is in plain view
3. Immediately apparent that the item is
contraband or fruit of a crime
4. Supported by probable cause to believe an
is contraband before seizing it
5. Allows for the seizure of the item
*Does NOT have to be inadvertent
Yes
Yes
No
Invalid S
Valid Seizure
Remedy if invalid search and/or seizure: exclude evidence via Weeks for federal law
Mapp & Wolf for state/local actors
dangerous
3. Officer may check outer
clothing of person for weapons
Seizure
enforcement, and