SAN PEDRO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

FINAL THESIS DEFENSE

SCORING RUBRIC

GROUP LEADER: TORALBA et. al STRAND: 12-ABM

RESEARCH TITLE: THE SPENDING HABITS AND THE LEVEL OF FINANCIAL LITERACY OF GRADE
11 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN SAN PEDRO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Directions: Analyze the research output based on the following criteria below. Check the appropriate
column (5 as the highest and 1 as the lowest) indicating your evaluation.

INTRODUCTION

Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
1. Factors that led to the problem are well-discussed
2. Conceptual framework adequately supports the main
problem or the title of the study
3. The research paradigm is able to provide the direction and
skeletal framework of the study.
4. The aims/ purposes or objectives were thoroughly
presented.
5. In general, the manuscript is scholarly written and has
global impact in educational context as a whole.

LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
1. Cited literature and studies are adequate and relevant to
the research problem.
2. Foreign literature, studies, literature and local studies are
present.
3. The sources of the cited literatures and studies are
appropriately acknowledged and or credited.
4. The researchers were able to determine the construct and
variable of their study from the theory presented.
5. The framework presented conceptualizes the concepts of
the theory appropriately.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD

Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
1. The research methodology is well-described and is
suitable or fitting to the research problem
2. The participants of the study are well-described in terms of
the sample profile, sample size and sampling technique and
or procedure.
3. The research instrument is presented and discussed
4. The statistical tool selected is appropriate to gather the
needed data and answer the problem of the study.
5. The research design and method employed by the
researchers are correct and relevant to the fulfillment of the
accurate results of the study
 SAN PEDRO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
1. Tables and figures are scholarly presented
2. Analysis of datasets is well-written and done.
3. Results are verifiable as implied from the datasets.
4. Drawing implications from the discovery of the study were
done properly.
5. The way the results are presented addressed the gap of
the study or the title of their research

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
1. Conclusion is drawn appropriately from the findings of the
study through a generalization.
2. The conclusion of the study is logically presented and
written by the researchers.
3. The conclusion capsulate the entire research endeavors
and answers the aims of the study.
4. Recommendations are formulated based on the findings
and conclusions of the study.
5. Recommendations are SMART (Specific, Measurable,
Attainable, Reliable, Time-bound)

OVER-ALL TOTAL: _____________

COMMENTS: REMARKS:
Approved with no revisions
Approved with minor revisions
Approved with major revisions
Rejected
Proposed for Re-defense

________________________________________
Name and Signature of Rater

Noted by:

DAN ANGELO G. DUCO

Research Adviser