You are on page 1of 13

RESISTANCE TO FLOW IN

ALLUVIAL CHANNELS

by
M.K. MITTAL Retd. Prof.
DEPT. OF CIVIL ENGG.
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE
RESISTANCE RELATIONSHIP RELATES U,R,S WITH SOME
RESISTANCE PARAMETERS LIKE MANNING’S n
OR Chezy’s C

U= R2/3 S1/2 OR U= C
FOR RIGID BED CHANNELS WITH CLEAR WATER C & n ARE
WELL DEFINED, NOT SO FOR ALLUVIAL STREAMS – MOVABLE
BED, PRESENCE OF BED FORMS CARRIE Q & QT

RESISTANCE IN ALLUVIAL CHANNELS HIGHLY VARIABLE


GRAIN RESISTANCE
………............
F= (d)
.

GRAIN + FORM RESISTANCE

VARIABE F=( UNDULATIONS)


IMPORTANCE :

 DESIGN OF STABLE CHANNELS TO CARRY Q & QT


 PREPARATION OF STAGE DISCHARGE CURVE
 ESTIMATION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT

APPROACHES:

 DIVISION OF RESISTANCE---
TOTAL RESISTANCE = GRAIN + FORM RESISTANCE
TOTAL RESISTANCE = f ( FLOW, FLUID AND SEDIMENT)
DIVISION OF RESISTANCE : MANY APPROACHES ,
DISCUSS EINSTEIN & BARBAROSSA’S METHOD

PREMISE : TOTAL RESISTANCE= GRAIN+ FORM


ACCORDINGLY R= R’ + R’’
FOR R’ MANNING – STRICKLER’S EQ. PROPOSED

U= R’2/3 S1/2 WHERE ns =


FOR CALCULATING FORM RESISTANCE, RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN ∗ VS Ψ’ WAS PROPOSED ,
AS IN BELOW
MEAN VELOCITY DETERMINATION FOR A GIVEN Y OR R

 INVOLVES TRIAL & ERROR


 ASSUME R’ < R
TOTAL RESISTANCE APPROACH

 LACEY’S EQ. U= 10.8 R2/3 S1/3 IN S.I.UNITS


FOR STABLE CHANNELS, USED FOR ALLUVIAL RIVERS
DURING HIGH FLOOD NOT FOR LOWER STAGES AS
CONCEPT- REGIME SEDIMENT SIZE d IS ALSO TAKEN

 RELATIONSHIP BY GARDE AND RANGA RAJU

PARAMERS R/d S/(∆γs /γf) AND


∆ /

COMPLETELY DEFINE THE RESISTANCE RELATIONSHIP


VALID FOR RIPPLE,DUNES, TRANSITION AND ANTIDUNES
RANGE OF PARAMETERS USED IN GARDE AND RANGA RAJU’S
RELATIONSHIP

PARAMETER RANGE
R 0.023m -17.10m
U 0.58m/s – 3.45m/s
S 3.64x10-5 to 2.66x10-2
d 0.011mm to 5.2 mm
RELATIVE DENSITY OF 1.052 to 4.22
SEDIMENT

You might also like