Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Great Zimbabwe Controversy
Great Zimbabwe Controversy
Controversy
Presentation by
amigo tutor: Theresa Shamiso Sibanda
Email address: shamisoblessing@gmail.com
Cell: 0774658065
Introduction
Mudenge S I believed that that the ruins were constructed in the 11th century
and completed around 13th century and declined in the 15th century.
He believed that the constructors of Great Zimbabwe were Shonas since the
prints of European can not be traced.
Vicente Pedago visited Great Zimbabwe around 1531 and wrote about the great
work of stone .He was amazed to discover such great work in an uncivilized
area.
Its believed Great Zimbabwe was built and existed between 1100-1450.
Time theory
Some scholars content that Great Zimbabwe was built by Leopold kopje
nomadic pastoralists.
These were the people who moved from place to place in search for good
pastures for their animals.
These nomadic pastoralists settled at Great Zimbabwe and this marked the
beginning of Great Zimbabwe.
Afrocentric historian -James Mullan
Afrocentric historians like J. Mullan give credit to locals such as the Lemba
especially the Takavare clan who were multi skilled.
Some scholars argue that Great Zimbabwe was built by the Lemba
people(varemba).
These people were good in artistic work or skilled sculptors.
They ware talented in working and shaping stones / masonry or sculpturing.
The Lemba bury their dead in stretched positions and fossils have been found at
the site to support this claim that it’s the Lemba who built the monuments.
Ibn Said –an Arab trader(1214-1286)
K Mufuka and P Garlake
The above Afrocentric writers content that The builders of Great Zimbabwe were
the Shonas.
Jao de Barros and others first propounded that ”whites did not build Great
Zimbabwe,blacks did.”
Chigwedere, Hodza concluded artefacts found at Great Zimbabwe confirms Shona
traditional culture.
Randall –Maclver D first archaeologist to study Great Zimbabwe confirm has African
origin.
The Shonas build stone structures at Great Zimbabwe and those around Zimbabwe.
Beach DN noted divining bowls soapstone etc and this supports the African built the
monuments.
Cont’
Some scholars argue that Great Zimbabwe was built by the late iron age
communities.
These were the people who were using iron tools.
Even among Afrocentric historians there a debate on who built Great Zimbabwe?
Was Great Zimbabwe built by Mapungubwe people, Lemba,Leopard kopje
pastoralists, Late iron age societies or local Karanga people.
Failure to provide a definite answer brings controversy.
This debate brings controversy on building controversy or construction theory.
Eurocentric view
Eurocentric historians argue that Great Zimbabwe was built by Arabs , Persian
s ,Chinese or Swahilis .
They argued that the stones structures at Great Zimbabwe were similar to the
buildings found where these people came from .
The chances are high that when these people came to trade , they ended up
building structures such as the Great Zimbabwe.
Cont’
Some Eurocentric writers content that Great Zimbabwe was built by King Solomon and Queen Sheba
They argue that the gold storage facilities that were found at Great Zimbabwe belonged to King
Solomon and the ornaments and beads that were discovered belonged to Queen Sheba .
They argue that Great Zimbabwe is that lost city in a dark continent described in the book of 2 kings .
Karl Mauch supports this view using the artefacts of cedar wood found at the lintel which he believes
came from Lebanon.
Cont”
The two writers concluded that the civilization was not by local Africans.
These two were hired by BSAC to do some investigations.
The content that Great Zimbabwe was built by more civilized races.
Items found at Great Zimbabwe prove that it was not built by Africans.
Purpose of the conical
tower(architectural controversy)
There is controversy on why the conical tower was built.
Some scholars argue that it was used for storing grain.
Others argue that it was constructed for religious reasons as it represented
fertility.
Some scholars argue that the conical tower was used as a watch tower.
It is where the cattle herders used to climb as they herd their cattle.
Some scholars argue that the conical tower showed the power and authority of
the king.
This was because its shape resembled the shape of manhood hence showing
power and authority.
Mukanya
Mufuka suggested that the tower was built for religious purpose.
They wanted to be closer to mwari.
The tower was an altar for religious ceremonies.
It was a religious shrine.
Ritual bowls and soapstone bowls found butresses this point.
Huffman talks of birds found at the site had a religous significance.(shiri
yehungwe soapstone images)
conclusion