Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Advances in Structural Engineering and Rehabilitation Select Proceedings of Trace 2018 Sondipon Adhikari Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Advances in Structural Engineering and Rehabilitation Select Proceedings of Trace 2018 Sondipon Adhikari Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-transportation-
engineering-select-proceedings-of-trace-2018-srinivas-pulugurtha/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-water-resources-
engineering-and-management-select-proceedings-of-
trace-2018-rafid-alkhaddar/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-sustainable-
construction-materials-and-geotechnical-engineering-select-
proceedings-of-trace-2018-sanjay-kumar-shukla/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-energy-and-built-
environment-select-proceedings-of-trace-2018-guoqiang-zhang/
Advances in Interdisciplinary Engineering Select
Proceedings of FLAME 2018 Mukul Kumar
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-interdisciplinary-
engineering-select-proceedings-of-flame-2018-mukul-kumar/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-structural-
engineering-select-proceedings-of-face-2019-k-v-l-subramaniam/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-industrial-and-
production-engineering-select-proceedings-of-flame-2018-kripa-
shanker/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-fluid-and-thermal-
engineering-select-proceedings-of-flame-2018-pankaj-saha/
https://textbookfull.com/product/recent-advances-in-traffic-
engineering-select-proceedings-of-rate-2018-shriniwas-s-arkatkar/
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
Sondipon Adhikari
B. Bhattacharjee
J. Bhattacharjee Editors
Advances in
Structural
Engineering and
Rehabilitation
Select Proceedings of TRACE 2018
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
Volume 38
Series Editors
Marco di Prisco, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
Sheng-Hong Chen, School of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,
Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Ioannis Vayas, Institute of Steel Structures, National Technical University of
Athens, Greece
Sanjay Kumar Shukla, School of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup,
WA, Australia
Anuj Sharma, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
Nagesh Kumar, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science
Bangalore, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Chien Ming Wang, School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland,
Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (LNCE) publishes the latest developments in
Civil Engineering - quickly, informally and in top quality. Though original research
reported in proceedings and post-proceedings represents the core of LNCE, edited
volumes of exceptionally high quality and interest may also be considered for
publication. Volumes published in LNCE embrace all aspects and subfields of, as
well as new challenges in, Civil Engineering. Topics in the series include:
– Construction and Structural Mechanics
– Building Materials
– Concrete, Steel and Timber Structures
– Geotechnical Engineering
– Earthquake Engineering
– Coastal Engineering
– Hydraulics, Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering
– Environmental Engineering and Sustainability
– Structural Health and Monitoring
– Surveying and Geographical Information Systems
– Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
– Transportation and Traffic
– Risk Analysis
– Safety and Security
To submit a proposal or request further information, please contact the appropriate
Springer Editor:
– Mr. Pierpaolo Riva at pierpaolo.riva@springer.com (Europe and Americas);
– Ms. Swati Meherishi at swati.meherishi@springer.com (India);
– Ms. Li Shen at li.shen@springer.com (China);
– Dr. Loyola D’Silva at loyola.dsilva@springer.com (S-E Asia and Australia/NZ).
Indexed by Scopus
J. Bhattacharjee
Editors
Advances in Structural
Engineering
and Rehabilitation
Select Proceedings of TRACE 2018
123
Editors
Sondipon Adhikari B. Bhattacharjee
Swansea University Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Swansea, Wales, UK New Delhi, India
J. Bhattacharjee
Amity University
Noida, India
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721,
Singapore
Preface
The world focuses on civil engineering to meet the ever-growing demand to handle
rising population, various energy and environmental concerns, and safety of
structures and inhabitants. Reckoning the ever-growing demand in the civil engi-
neering sector, the Second International Conference on “Trends and Advancement
in Civil Engineering” was hosted by the Department of Civil Engineering, ASET,
Amity University, Noida, on August 23 and 24, 2018. The objective of the
TRACE-2018 was to provide a platform for researchers, engineers, academicians,
and industrial professionals from all over the world to present their research results
and development activities over broad spectrum of topics and domains such as
building construction, design, smart and green materials, sustainable development
of infrastructure, rehabilitation and retrofitting, and application of GIS in civil
engineering. Such exposure was helpful for the aspiring engineers and practitioners
to share and discuss innovative ideas with field professionals and academicians,
both national and international. This conference provided opportunities for the
delegates to exchange new ideas and application experiences face to face, to
establish business or research relations, and to find global partners for future
collaboration.
The book on Advances in Structural Engineering and Rehabilitation includes
the following:
• Covers a wide range of research areas in structural engineering, making it a
useful reference resource for researchers, academicians, and practicing
engineers.
• Presents recent advances in structural engineering along with contributions from
top experts in the field.
• Includes articles on applications like structural health monitoring, vibration
control, nanomaterials, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
v
vi Preface
This book includes research articles from pioneer researchers in the field of
structural engineering. The articles are peer-reviewed by experts to ensure the best
standard of research work. After the rigorous process of review and the subsequent
revision by authors, the articles are accepted to be a part of this esteemed book.
To fulfill the vision of most Honorable Founder President Dr. Ashok K. Chauhan
and under the able leadership of Honorable Chancellor Dr. Atul Chauhan, we are
honored to organize such prestigious conference which connects the world’s
foremost industries with the world’s topmost academia.
I want to thank everyone involved in making TRACE-2018 a grand success.
I appreciate the indispensable contribution of all the invited speakers and authors
from the field as well as the academia. Further, I want to convey my sincere thanks
to all the co-editors of the book. I extend my warm gratitude toward all our
sponsors: academic partners: Liverpool John Moores University, National
University of Malaysia, Springer; industry partner: DIPM; knowledge partners:
ICE, WiSE, Indian Association for Structural Engineers, and IGS; gold partner: JK
Cement; hospitality partner: BFD Weddings and Events; support partners: Bentley,
HEICO, VCL, Shubham Builders, Amaatra Group, and BL Goel and Co.
More importantly, I am happy to acknowledge that the research paper publi-
cation is planned to be published with Springer. This is in itself a stamp for top
quality and originality of work to be presented during this conference.
Finally, I compliment my team for their hard work and enthusiasm to make
TRACE a grand success story.
vii
Contents
ix
x Contents
xi
xii About the Editors
designing and execution of various types of civil engineering works including about
5 years in the multinational consultancy organization Gherzi Eastern Ltd. He has
also published about 100 articles in various national and international journals and
conferences. Dr. Bhattacharjee received two prestigious Awards for Excellence
from Indian Building Congress. He has also developed and taught a number of new
courses at the graduate and postgraduate levels at Amity University. He is a Life
Member of 16 technical bodies in India and abroad, and is a governing council
member of the Indian Building Congress. He has authored a book entitled Concrete
Structures – Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting.
Experimental and Numerical Study
to Improve Lateral Load Resistance
of Masonry Stack
Abstract Lateral load capacity of any structure plays a very important role to resist
earthquake [1]. To understand the lateral load capacity of any low-rise masonry
building, a 3D finite element model of unconfined brick masonry stack has been
drawn here. The ANSYS modeling of plain brick masonry shows that masonry
structure fails at the joint. Therefore, to impart ductility and strength in the stack,
shear key of 4 mm diameter TMT bar of 1/8th, 1/6th, and 1/4th of longitudinal
length of brick length is provided at every joint separately in different samples and
performance of both confined and unconfined prism is tested against vertical and
horizontal load [2]. The purpose of this study was to develop a better behavior of
low-rise masonry building during earthquake. Numerical as well as experimental
methods have been adapted to calculate the stress developed in masonry stack [3].
1 Introduction
Unconfined masonry was used in approx. all types of structure since the life begins
[4]. The masonry structures were made by two basic materials: brick and stone.
These structures were not reinforced and designed to support mainly gravity loads.
These masonry structures were very good at resisting wind and earthquakes. Masonry
building has shown very poor performance during strong earthquake, so it is very
important to improve the lateral load resistance of masonry buildings [5]. So to
achieve this objective, many researches have been performed in the past. The main
focus is on ensuring that these inertial forces caused by the ground vibrations reach
the ground without causing major damage or complete collapse in the structures [6].
This research starts with analyzing the scaled unconfined model of four bricks on
shake table in laboratory and then confined the same four brick model with varying
diameter reinforced to strengthening the unconfined brick model to resist the lateral
load [7]. And when the confined models were tested on shake table and compared
the result with unconfined brick masonry, a significant lateral strength was observed.
2 Modeling of Structure
The ANSYS software contains more than 100 different element types in its element
library. Each element has a unique number and a prefix that identifies the element
category, such as BEAM3, PLANE42, and SOLID45. ANSYS classifies the ele-
ments into 21 different groups, out of which our main concern is of structural group.
SOLID45 is used for the 3D modeling of solid structures [8]. The element is defined
by eight nodes having three degrees of freedom at each node: translations in the nodal
x, y, and z directions. The element has plasticity, creep, swelling, stress stiffening,
large deflection, and large strain capabilities [9].
For the brick element material properties which are assigned are modulus of elasticity
(EX) and Poisson’s ratio (PRXY) [10]. Values of EX and PRXY are taken according
to Ali and page 1986 [5] and are tabulated below (Tables 1 and 2).
To model the masonry, rectangular blocks are used for bricks and also for mortar.
Four numbers of bricks of standard size, i.e., 190 mm × 90 mm × 90 mm are used,
and mortar of thickness 10 mm is placed in between them as shown in Figs. 1 and 2.
also applied to the specimen M1. Different stress contours are drawn, and graph has
been plotted between different parameters. For specimen M2 in Fig. 2, one end is
fixed to make it confined and vertical load is applied.
3 Experimental Investigation
For confinement of the masonry prism, TMT steel bars of 4 mm diameter were used.
Between every course, shear keys of 26.25 mm = 1/8th, 35 mm = 1/6th, 52.5 mm
= 1/4th of longitudinal length of brick length consecutively in different specimens
were used as shown in Fig. 8a–c.
For determination of compressive strength, bricks were taken out from curing tank
and tested in UTM (Figs. 9 and 10). Tests were carried out at 7, 14, and 28 days of
curing.
Different Stresses at Failure for Confined and Unconfined Masonry are tabulated
below in Table 3.
8 A. K. Shukla et al.
Fig. 8 a and b Schematic view of masonry prism. c Pictorial view of reinforcement used
For understanding the behavior of masonry prism against lateral loading, i.e., in
earthquake or in wind load, shaker table test with varying frequency was performed.
The unconfined brick masonry samples were put on the shaker table platform and
fixed with the help of clamp (Fig. 11). After fixing unconfined masonry tightly on
the platform, a frequency of 5 Hz and amplitude of 10 mm was set and the motor
was run on this frequency for at least 120 s.
All the samples including confined and unconfined masonry are tested under the hori-
zontal load using the unidirectional shake table with varying frequency and amplitude
as shown in Fig. 11. The result is tabulated in Table 4.
When brick was tested under universal testing machine (UTM), the average strength
of brick was found to be 9.21 N/mm2 and strength of cement sand mortar was found
to be 14.57 N/mm2 at 28 days of curing.
So material was found according to weak brick strong mortar theory.
Test conclusion of unconfined and confined brick masonry tested under universal
testing machine and under shake table test is summarized below in Table 5.
Table 4 Shake table test results
Stability analysis
S. No. Frequency of Amplitude ‘g’ value Unconfined brick Confined Confined Confined
shake table (mm) masonry
(Hz) Brick masonry (shear Brick masonry (shear Brick masonry
key = 26.25 mm) key = 35 mm) (shear key =
52.5 mm)
Stability Time (in s) Stability Time (in s) Stability Time (in s) Stability Time
1 0.3 2.5 2 Stable 120 Stable 120 Stable 120 Stable 120
2 0.4 5.0 2 Stable 120 Stable 120 Stable 120 Stable 120
3 0.5 7.5 2 Collapse 26 Stable 120 Stable 120 Stable 120
Experimental and Numerical Study to Improve Lateral Load …
5 Conclusion
References
1. Page AW, Brooks DS (1985) Load bearing masonry—review. In: Proceedings of the 7th inter-
national brick masonry conference, pp 81–99
2. Drysdale RG, Wong HE (1985) Interpretation of the compressive strength of masonry prisms.
In: Proceedings of the 7th international brick masonry conference
3. Suter GT, Naguib EMF (1987) Effect of brick stiyness orrhorrapy on the lateral stress in stuck-
bonded brick masonry prisms. In: Proceedings, fourth North American masonry conference,
paper 18
4. Khoo CL, Hendry AW (1973) A failure criterion for brick work in axial compression. In:
Proceedings of the 3rd international brick masonry conference
5. Ali S, Page AW (1988) Finite element model for masonry subjected to concentrated loads. J
Struct Div ASCE 114(8):1761–1784
6. Rots JG (1991) Computer simulation of masonry structure: continuum and discontinuum mod-
els. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on computer methods in structural masonry
Swansea, UK, April 1991, pp 93–103
7. Stockl S, Bienvirth H, Kupfer H (1994) The influence of test method on the results of compres-
sion tests on mortar. In: Proceedings of the 10th IBMAC, University of Calgary, pp 1397–1406
8. Brooks JJ, Abu Baker BH (1998) The modulus of elasticity of masonry. Br Mason Soc J 12(2)
9. Yoshimura K et al (2004) Experimental study for developing higher seismic performance of
brick masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 13th World conference on earthquake engineering,
Vancouver, Canada, Paper No. 1597
10. Mohammed MS (2009) Finite element analysis masonry walls of unreinforced masonry
Experimental Study of Confined Brick
Masonry Building
Abstract The frequency of the occurrence of earthquake has risen in the last decade
and the casualties with low-rise structure, especially unconfined structure, were very
high in comparison to reinforced concrete structure worldwide. In this study, the
behaviour of confined building in lateral load has investigated. A confined building
model has been constructed in the laboratory with the help of scaled bricks, mortar and
reinforcement. The building model is tested on shake table under external excitation
force of different magnitudes and frequencies. With the help of PULSE Labshop, the
values of displacement, velocity and acceleration are measured at different locations
of model. The response of the four-storey building model is measured and presented,
and the response of the building is analysed under harmonic vibration.
Keywords Building model · Confined masonry · Shake table test · B&K Pulse ·
Frequency analysis
1 Introduction
building system. The use of confined brick masonry system fulfils this demand up to a
good level for low to medium-rise buildings. San Bartolomé et al. [1], in his research
work, used reduced scale (1:2.5) confined brick masonry building of three storey
height made up of clay masonry, whose walls were confined by reinforced concrete
elements. The weight of the specimen was 57.78 kN. He kept vibration properties,
strength of materials and axial stress of the model similar to those of actual buildings.
Ishibashi et al. [2], in this paper, used three full-scale confined masonry specimens
which were designed and constructed on the basis of the Mexican codes. In the
experimental programme, the variable was the flexural coupling between two wall
panels. They find that the degree of coupling did not influence the failure mode of
the specimen, which was governed by shear failure of the masonry panels.
All the models were consisted of two wall units which were made up of clay bricks.
Tomaževič [3] two models of a typical confined masonry building as per EURO
CODE 8 have been tested on a shaking table which was constructed with a reduced
scale of 1:5, and a wall to floor area was kept as 5%. Both models were subjected to a
series of simulated ground motions with increased intensity of shaking. They find that
diagonal cracks were observed in all stories at maximum resistance state [4]. Also, the
rupture of the reinforcement of tie column and crushing of concrete was also observed
at the ultimate state. Abrams [5], in the University of Illinois, tested two reduced-
scale unreinforced masonry buildings on shake table to highlight selected aspects
of dynamic response that helps in confirming or denying engineering practices for
seismic evaluation of unreinforced buildings. A scale of 3:8 and type O mortar
was used for constructing models of clay masonry units in running bond pattern.
Naseer [6], in his research work, determines the behaviour of typical confined brick
masonry building under seismic loading, and he also evaluated response modification
factor and ductility ratio of the confined brick masonry model. He presented failure
mechanism and behaviour of confined masonry buildings during past earthquakes all
over the world. Kazemi et al. [7] made a single-storey model full-scale unreinforced
confined brick masonry building on the shaking table facility of 4 × 4 m dimensions.
It consists of four brick masonry walls conned with reinforced mortar tie columns
and steel bond beams. The model was subjected to the scaled earthquake records
of Bam, Tabas and El Centro, as well as a harmonic acceleration with gradually
increasing amplitude.
2 Building of Model
The building model on geometrically reduced scale of 1/8th is prepared in the struc-
tural engineering laboratory of IIT (BHU) Varanasi. The property of the model is as
follows:
Experimental Study of Confined Brick Masonry Building 17
Hence total weight of single storey = weight of (brickwork + mortar + concrete work)
= 16.6 + 0.3157 + 3.465 = 20.38 kg
Total weight of the building model = 20.38 × 4 = 81.5 kg
The CBM model is a 350 mm × 350 mm G+3 storey model with four openings,
out of which two doors of width 85 mm are provided on the opposite sides and two
windows of width 75 mm on the other two walls (Fig. 1).
Wall density of the CBM model—Wall density is defined as the ratio of total
cross-sectional area of all walls in one direction to the total floor area.
Since floor area of each floor = 350 × 350 = 122, 500 mm2
Total floor area for 4 floors = 4 × 122, 500 = 490, 000 mm2
13, 750
i.e. Wall Density in longitudinal direction = = 0.028 = 2.8 %
490, 000
Hence, wall density in longitudinal direction 2.8% is larger than 2%, in which the
minimum value is required for buildings located in the seismic zone III of India.
Wall density in the longitudinal direction (parallel of doors)
Hence, it also fulfils the minimum value of 2% required for buildings located in
the seismic zone III of India.