Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Labour Standards in International Economic Law 1St Edition Henner Gott Eds Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Labour Standards in International Economic Law 1St Edition Henner Gott Eds Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/international-economic-law-
contemporary-issues-1st-edition-giovanna-adinolfi/
https://textbookfull.com/product/good-faith-and-international-
economic-law-1st-edition-mitchell/
https://textbookfull.com/product/principles-of-international-
economic-law-matthias-herdegen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/labour-law-rules-marie-mcgregor/
Small and medium-sized enterprises in international
economic law First Edition Rensmann
https://textbookfull.com/product/small-and-medium-sized-
enterprises-in-international-economic-law-first-edition-rensmann/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-role-of-the-eu-in-the-
promotion-of-human-rights-and-international-labour-standards-in-
its-external-trade-relations-samantha-velluti/
https://textbookfull.com/product/international-economic-law-and-
governance-essays-in-honour-of-mitsuo-matsushita-1st-edition-
julien-chaisse/
https://textbookfull.com/product/eu-external-action-in-
international-economic-law-recent-trends-and-developments-mads-
andenas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/norms-without-the-great-powers-
international-law-and-changing-social-standards-in-world-
politics-first-edition-adam-bower/
Henner Gött Editor
Labour
Standards in
International
Economic Law
Labour Standards in International Economic Law
Henner G€ott
Editor
Labour Standards in
International Economic Law
Editor
Henner G€ott
Georg-August-University G€ottingen
Institute of International and European Law
G€ottingen, Germany
v
Contents
vii
viii Contents
ix
x Contributors
Henner G€
ott
Content
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Against this backdrop, securing and improving adequate levels of worker pro-
tection while preserving the benefits of globalization has become an issue of utmost
importance.2 What is at stake is not only to ensure effective compliance and
implementation as a factual matter. Rather, there is also the normative question
which level of protection is adequate, or, in other words, how labour standards
should be protected and promoted in the light of the challenges posed by a
1
ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization, adopted on 10 June 2008.
2
The ILO has conceptualized this question in its Decent Work Agenda, as laid down in its 2008
Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization. See International Labour Office (1999) and
Vosko (2002).
H. G€ott (*)
Georg-August-University G€
ottingen, Institute of International and European Law, G€
ottingen,
Germany
e-mail: hgoett@gwdg.de
globalized economy.3 Given the complexity of both the factual and the normative
dimension, it can hardly be surprising that no coherent, sustainable and satisfying
solution has been identified so far.
The status quo is that the protection and promotion of labour standards within the
context of economic globalization is dealt with in numerous contexts, which have
spawned a variety of different and disparate approaches both within and beyond the
confines of international law.4
Within the realm of international law, the two areas of prime relevance are
international labour law on the one hand and international economic law on the
other.
International labour law is concerned with the formulation and implementation
of internationally recognized labour standards, rights and policies. With its origins
dating back to the so-called ‘first globalization’ at the end of the nineteenth century,
it has demonstrated remarkable long-term viability.5 The ILO, the central interna-
tional organization in the field, has developed a comprehensive body of treaties,
recommendations, declarations and other instruments and a rich organizational
practice on the creation and implementation of labour standards. As to the current
economic globalization, the ILO has engaged in various initiatives to secure
adherence and to further promote labour standards.6 For one part, it has engaged
in both revisions and a prioritization of its numerous instruments. This resulted,
most prominently, in the identification of fundamental labour standards in the 1998
Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Righta at Work, which has become a
point of reference both for a realignment of resources and activities inside the ILO
and for numerous instruments and initiatives developed elsewhere. Moreover, the
ILO has defined and committed to pursue strategic objectives (job creation, fun-
damental principles and rights at work, social protection and social dialogue, as
well as gender equality as a crosscutting objective) in its Decent Work Agenda,
manifested in its 2008 Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization. At the
same time, the ILO has continued to experience major challenges to its work, both
internally and externally, some of which have the potential to substantially com-
promise its impact and, ultimately, even its relevance.
The second central body of law, international economic law, including interna-
tional trade law as well as international investment law and the law of international
financial institutions, frames and accompanies economic globalization through a
3
This normative dimension is relevant both for those concerned with positive international law and
those concerned with developing and changing this law as a matter of politics.
4
To promote coherence between these contexts has time and again amounted to a challenge in
itself. A prominent example is the—eventually unsuccessful—attempt to introduce labour stan-
dards into the law and practice of the WTO, on this see e.g. Leary (1997) and Weiss (2005).
Another example is the lengthy struggle to achieve at least some coherence between the so-called
EWI indicators used in the World Bank’s Doing Business Reports and the implementation and
further promotion of ILO conventions, Bakvis (2009).
5
On the origins and development see Servais (2014), p. 19 et seqq.
6
Maupain (2013), p. 51 et seqq.
Labour Standards in International Economic Law: An Introduction 3
rapidly developing body of norms. These norms are mostly laid down in multilat-
eral, regional and bilateral treaties and are significantly developed further by the
practice of powerful international organizations, such as the World Trade Organi-
zation (WTO), the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development
(OECD) or the Bretton Woods Institutions. These treaties and organizational
practices have had a profound impact on the current state of economic globaliza-
tion. In this context, they have also contributed to (re-)configuring the parameters
within which contemporary industrial relations take place. That being said, labour
standards have never been a central concern in international economic law—
indeed, they have at times been facing outright opposition.7 Yet, their role appears
to be slowly increasing at least in certain areas, for example in the context of
regional trade agreements.8
While international economic law and international labour law are two central
fields of concern, it would be negligent not to look beyond these two bodies of law.
With the international legal order being more developed and multifaceted than ever
before in history, it is only natural that the issue of protecting and promoting labour
standards in the globalized economy also touches on other areas of international
law, such as international institutional law or international human rights law.9
Certain human rights guarantees in regional and universal human rights instruments
have become central points of reference, like Art. 11 ECHR and the corresponding
jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, to name one prominent
example. In a similar vein, there are important links to the level of domestic law.10
What is more, labour standards play an increasing role in transnational economic
and social self-regulation by non-state actors. Non-state actors, such as enterprises,
trade unions and NGOs, have always played an important part in the formulation
and implementation of labour standards, both on the domestic and the international
level.11 As economic globalization coincides with diminishing regulatory capaci-
ties of states, self-regulation by non-state actors becomes more relevant also for
other parts of the international economic order.12 Many non-state actors have
developed own approaches to the protection and promotion of labour standards,
7
See e.g. the WTO’s refusal to include labour standards in its work, as prominently spelled out in
Singapore Ministerial Declaration, 18 Dec 1996, WT/MIN(96)/DEC, para. 4.
8
Including in recent major trade agreements, see e.g. Chapter 23 CETA. According to a 2016 ILO
study, ‘nearly half of trade agreements with labour provisions came into existence since 2008 and
over 80 per cent of agreements entering into force since 2013 included them’, ILO (2016), p. 22.
9
See e.g. Kolben (2010) and Swepston (2013).
10
As a general matter, international labour law heavily relies and depends on its implementation
through national legislators and authorities, see e.g. the obligations in Art. 19 (5) ILO Constitution.
Moreover, the issue of protecting labour standards in a globalized economy can become relevant in
civil litigation before domestic courts, see e.g. the pending case of Regional Court (Landgericht)
Dortmund, Mohammad Jabir et al. v. KiK Textilien und Non-Food GmbH, Case-No.7 O 95/15.
11
The most prominent example is the ILO’s tripartite structure, Art. 3 (1) and Art. 7 (1) ILO
Constitution. On further examples see Hepple (2005), p. 69 et seqq.
12
For a more general account see Peters et al. (2009).
4 H. G€
ott
some of which are transcending (or even clearly lying beyond) the realm of
international law in the traditional sense. Intricate examples for unilateral or
contractual cross-border self-regulation by enterprises, trade unions and NGOs
can be found in corporate codes of conduct, international framework agreements
or social labelling schemes.13 While evidently introducing normative propositions
on labour standards in globalization, the legal quality and relevance of these private
initiatives remain—at least from an international lawyer’s point of view—highly
uncertain.
The approaches to the protection and promotion of labour standards that can be
found in each of the aforementioned areas differ significantly as to their respective
rationale, scope, means and efficacy. Each of them has its own objectives, charac-
teristics, potentials and pitfalls. These divergencies in substance go along with a
considerable separation, and at times isolation, of professional and epistemic
communities of those who are concerned with international economic law and
those concerned with the protection and promotion of labour standards, both in
academia and in practice. This multidimensional fragmentation has repeatedly
resulted in remarkable misunderstandings, such as an unbalanced perception of
labour standards as mere obstacles to doing business, or unfortunate limitations of
political debates, e.g. when the question of how to improve labour chapters in trade
agreements is reduced to the issue whether these chapters should be enforceable by
temporary suspensions of trade benefits (so-called ‘trade sanctions’) or not. Perhaps
more than ever before, there is a need for increased coherence between approaches,
as there is a need for enhanced mutual understanding between communities.
This volume addresses some of the most pressing issues arising at the tangent of
international economic law and international labour standards. It deliberately
adopts a comprehensive perspective, covering the manifold approaches and the
different professional backgrounds mentioned above. Its aim is to provide analysis
and assessment of the law and practice, to broaden the perspective beyond
sub-fields and communities and to combine the threads in a single volume in
order to provide guidance to academics and practitioners who are facing the
challenge of securing adequate levels of worker protection in the globalized
economy.
The first part of the volume prepares the ground for the discussions in the
subsequent parts by elucidating the historical, organizational and conceptual back-
ground which informs labour standards and their role in international economic law
today.
The protection and promotion of labour standards in the international economic
order is by no means a new issue. As Peter-Tobias Stoll points out in his contribu-
tion, it has been a recurring issue ever since the end of the nineteenth century. In
order to shed light on the multiple connections and divisions between the economic
and social dimensions of international law and relations, he embarks on a historical
and analytical tour d’horizon. Claire La Hovary picks up in the present, assessing
13
See e.g. Davarnejad (2011), Burkett (2011) and Seidman (2009).
Labour Standards in International Economic Law: An Introduction 5
the ILO’s mandate and capacity to create, proliferate and supervise labour standards
in the globalized economy. Tripartism, the ILO’s most important foundational
feature, and its operationalization have come under severe pressure in the course
of the ILO’s post-2012 constitutional crisis. Yet, despite current difficulties,
La Hovary argues that ‘the current crisis affecting the ILO also suggests that the
organization does matter, as does its supervisory system’. While the ILO will
remain an institution of paramount importance in the field, it must not be
overlooked that contemporary labour law has transcended the traditional structures
of domestic and international law. It operates, in the words of Anne Trebilcock,
‘within, between and beyond States to form a type of (imperfect and incomplete)
multi-layered global governance’. In her contribution, Trebilcock points out why
this shift from international to transnational labour law matters for labour standards.
She concludes that transnational labour law’s ‘broader vision of reuniting the social
and the economic [. . .] seems at least theoretically better placed to test different
solutions until the most promising can emerge within a particular context’.
After the scene is set, the contributions in the volume’s second part explore the
role of labour standards in the most prominent fields of international economic law,
which are trade, investment and finance.
Given that initiatives to include provisions on labour into the multilateral trade
regime failed both in the case of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT) and again when establishing the WTO, Thomas Cottier explores whether
the recent WTO EC - Seals case will be of help in this regard. He concludes that the
WTO’s case law is worth studying and that such studies will likely reveal some
policy space ‘to support and pursue labour standards and human rights abroad,
using the means and instruments of trade policy in a well-calibrated manner’.
Franziska Humbert, in focusing on child labour, advocates in favour of an
ILO-WTO implementation mechanism. This institutional solution, she argues,
can be seen in line with a ‘constitutionalist approach’.
Many of the preferential trade agreements that have recently been concluded or
are currently being negotiated to try to rectify the WTO’s refusal to address labour
standards. As Tonia Novitz explains, in EU trade agreements, there is ‘an apparent
shift away from a human rights [. . .] perspective to one more focused on sustainable
development’, which in her view warrants caution. The same holds true in view of the
involvement of the civil society in this context, as Jan Orbie, Lore Van den Putte and
Deborah Martens conclude after a look to the actual practice of such civil society
mechanisms in the light of their objectives. Their analysis reveals that civil society
involvement in free trade agreements lacks a clear definition of purpose. As they put
it: ‘It appears unclear what exactly civil society should be doing in this regard.’
The relevance of labour provisions in trade agreements largely depends on their
implementation and enforcement mechanisms. The North American Free Trade
Area (NAFTA) side agreement on labour employed a specific arbitration model,
which the US has used, with certain modifications, in its subsequent trade agree-
ments. As Patrick Abel points out in his comparative analysis, however, these
mechanisms suffer from ‘an unsuitable procedural and institutional design’,
which may explain that the mechanisms have only poorly been used and have not
6 H. G€
ott
lived up to expectations. Drawing from these findings, Henner G€ ott explores the
potential of ‘an Individual Labour Complaint Procedure for Workers, Trade
Unions, Employers and NGOs in Future Free Trade Agreements’. This proposal
is aiming at endowing those actors which have a genuine interest in the implemen-
tation of labour chapters in trade agreements with the procedural means to do so,
thus enhancing the chapter’s overall performance. The debate on labour chapters in
trade agreements has an immediate and continuing practical relevance. The
EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), which was
signed in October 2016 and is being provisionally applied at the time of this writing,
has received widespread public attention and criticism in Europe. The same is true
for the envisaged EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP),
which, despite its fate being uncertain after the last presidential election in the USA,
is likely to remain a point of reference in future trade negotiations. Reingard
Zimmer analyses these agreements with a special focus on social standards. She is
particularly concerned about the far-reaching mechanisms for regulatory coopera-
tion and investment protection.
Next to trade provisions, investment liberalization and protection is an integral
part of recent trade agreements. Henner G€ ott and Till Patrik Holterhus discuss
whether the combination of investment and labour chapters in recent free trade
agreements may enhance the role of labour standards in international investment
law. They conclude that there are indeed ‘opportunities to promote an adequate
balance of investor and labour concerns’, but the provisions in contemporary
agreements and drafts ‘do not in themselves sufficiently steer towards this goal’.
Besides trade and investment, the law of international financial institutions is the
third important pillar of international economic law. In historical perspective, the
World Bank Group member organizations’ approaches to labour standards have
repeatedly led to conflicts and critique. Franz Christian Ebert explains that, in
2016, the World Bank has ‘for the first time [set out] detailed labour standards
requirements for both the Bank’s staff and its borrowers’, which, however, have
their shortcomings.
The volume’s third part addresses the numerous and diverse non-state actor
approaches to enhance the protection and promotion of labour standards in the
globalized economy.
The inclusion of labour standards in self-imposed corporate codes of conduct has
received wide resonance in academia and practice, including both appraisal and
critique. Katja Gehne approaches this phenomenon from a practitioner’s point of
view. Finding that ‘soft standards at the international level have emerged as a
standard of responsible business management’, she argues that they ‘could be part
of a (para-)legal answer to deficiencies of national states’ human rights protection
systems’. To step in governance gaps is also the purpose of joint endeavors of trade
union federations and multinational groups to strengthen labour standards in cor-
porate governance by way of international framework agreements. In his contribu-
tion, R€
udiger Krause highlights that the success of such agreements largely depends
on them being implemented in strong and resilient industrial relations, which in turn
they are able to reinforce. Therefore, he calls for the conclusion of more robust
Labour Standards in International Economic Law: An Introduction 7
References
Bakvis P (2009) The World Bank’s doing business report: a last fling for the Washington
consensus? Transfer: Eur Rev Labour Res 15(3–4):419–438
Burkett BW (2011) International framework agreements: an emerging international regulatory
approach or a passing European phenomenon. Can Labour Employ Law J 16(1):81–114
Davarnejad L (2011) In the shadow of soft law: the handling of corporate social responsibility
disputes under the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. J Dispute Resolut 2011
(2):351–385
Hepple B (2005) Labour laws and global trade. Hart Publishing, Oxford
ILO (1999) Decent work: Report of the Director-General to the International Labour Conference,
87th Session 1999. ILO, Geneva
ILO (2016) Assessment of labour provisions in trade and investment agreements. Studies on
growth with equity. ILO, Geneva
Kolben K (2010) Labor rights as human rights? Virginia Journal of International Law 50:449–484
Leary VA (1997) The WTO and the social clause: post-Singapore. Eur J Int Law (1):118–122
Maupain F (2013) The future of the International Labour Organization in the global economy.
Hart, Oxford
8 H. G€
ott
Peters A, Koechlin L, F€
orster T, Zinkernagel F (eds) (2009) Non-state actors as standard setters.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Seidman G (2009) Social labeling in export supply chains: can voluntary certification programs
end child labor? India in transition. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Servais J-M (2014) International labour law, 4th edn. Kluwer Law International, Alphen an den
Rhijn
Swepston L (2013) The International Labour Organization and international human rights system.
In: Sheeran S, Sir Rodley N (eds) Routledge handbook of international human rights law.
Routledge, London, pp 339–352
Vosko LF (2002) ‘Decent work’: the shifting role of the ILO and the struggle for global social
justice. Glob Soc Policy 2(1):19–46
Weiss F (2005) Trade and labor I. In: Macrory PFJ, Appleton AE, Plummer MG (eds) The World
Trade Organization: legal, economic and political analysis, vol II. Springer, New York, pp
571–596
Part I
Setting the Scene
International Economic and Social
Dimensions: Divided or Connected?
Peter-Tobias Stoll
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2 The Interwar Period: The International Labour Organization and Stubborn Nationalism
in Economic Affairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3 Uniting Economic and Social Dimensions? Early Institution Building After World
War II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.1 The ILO and the 1944 Philadelphia Declaration as an Early Starter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.2 The World Bank Group and Keynesian Thought . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.3 The United Nations: World Economic and Social Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.4 The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Social Rights and Human Rights . . . . 17
3.5 The 1948 Havana Charter: A World Economic and Social Order Under the Auspices
of the UN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.6 An Early Divide: The GATT Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.7 In Sum: Important Achievements and Pragmatic Promotion of Economic
Cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4 Development as a ‘Social’ Concern and the New International Economic Order . . . . . . . . . 20
4.1 International Investments in Focus: CSR and International Investment Law . . . . . . . . 22
4.1.1 From the United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations
to Corporate Social Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.1.2 The Emergence of International Investment Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
4.2 The Development of the Global Human Rights System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
4.3 In Sum: Ideologic Battles and Some Progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
5 The ‘Era of Globalization’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
5.1 Sustainable Development: The 1992 Rio Conference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
5.2 The Establishment of the World Trade Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
5.3 Social Development and Decent Work: UN and ILO Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
5.4 Labour Clauses in GSPs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.5 Labour Clauses in Free Trade Agreements and Bilateral Investment Agreements . . 29
5.6 Corporate Social Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.7 Summary: Diversity of Approaches and Bilateralism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
6 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
1 Introduction
The recent discussions on trade and labour standards as reflected in this book mirror
the widespread concern that today’s international legal framework for globalization
does not sufficiently address labour conditions and, more generally, social justice.1
As is often observed, it appears that globalization moves on with the help of
creating and further developing international ‘economic’ institutions and rules,
while the ‘social’ aspects are left behind and marginalized. Often, this goes along
with statements indicating that economic and social concerns have been more
closely linked in the past and that they should come this close again. A historical
and analytical tour d’horizon might help to give context to the recent discussion by
offering a short overview over a bit more than a century of international relations
and some reflections on what has been understood to be ‘economic’ and ‘social’ and
how the two are or should be interrelated.
A look to the past may start with the establishment of the International Labour
Organization in the aftermath of World War I in 1919. Indeed, the establishment of
this organization as a part of the Versailles peace treaty has made labour conditions
and social justice a permanent international concern, closely linked to peace.2 In its
preamble, the ILO constitution explicitly states that a ‘universal and lasting peace
can be established only if it is based upon social justice’3 and furthermore acknowl-
edges that ‘conditions of labour exist involving such injustice, hardship and priva-
tion to large numbers of people as to produce unrest so great that the peace and
1
See for instance, the labour chapters in prominent free trade agreements: Chapter 23 Trade and
Labour of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) and Chapter 19 Labor of
the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), consolidated text available at https://ustr.gov/trade-agree
ments/free-trade-agreements/trans-pacific-partnership/tpp-full-text. Accessed 22 Dec 2016.
2
Treaty of Peace between the Allied and Associated Powers and Germany, signed at Versailles,
28 June 1919, 225 CTS 188, Part XIII Labour; see also Schorkopf (2010).
3
Preamble (1) ILO Constitution, signed 28 June 1919, 15 UNTS 30, 15 UNTS 40.
International Economic and Social Dimensions: Divided or Connected? 13
harmony of the world are imperilled’.4 Drawing from earlier international devel-
opments, including international conferences convened and some international
agreements concluded to improve the situation of workers before World War I,5
the ILO was tasked with the creation of international labour standards. ILO
activities in this regard were quite successful.6 However, these improvements of
labour conditions hardly came to bearing, as the working class, just as the societies
at large, greatly suffered from the world economic crisis.7
This economic crisis has been importantly aggravated by the lack of willingness
of States to cooperate. Instead, a beggar-thy-neighbour policy8 prevailed, with
governments resorting to national approaches at the expense of other states. The
League of Nations was poorly equipped to address the issue as it was neither
mandated to do so nor had institutional structures at hand. Both the 1922 Genoa9
and the 1933 London10 conference failed to achieve a consensus of States to jointly
address the challenges of the world economic crisis.11
When looking at this period, it appears fair to conclude that it has seen impres-
sive international progress in labour rights, while turning the working classes into
mass unemployment and misery as a result of the inability of governments to
cooperate to cope with the great depression and the world economic crisis and a
general destabilization of Europe in the wake of World War II.12
This important failure has been quite influential in the process of institution building
after World War II. As early as 1941, the leaders of the United Kingdom and the
United States, Churchill and Roosevelt, laid down their visions for the future world
order in the Atlantic Charter.13 The document can be understood as an embryonic
master plan for the establishment of the later United Nations and the post-war world
order, prominently featuring its economic and social dimensions. The Atlantic
Charter addresses economic issues like liberalization and non-discrimination in
4
Preamble (2) ILO Constitution, signed 28 June 1919, 15 UNTS 30, 15 UNTS 40.
5
Such as the Convention respecting the Prohibition of Night Work for Women in Industrial
Employment, signed 26 September 1906, 203 CTS 4; see Sauer (2014).
6
Troclet (1952), p. 421 and Haas (1964), pp. 148 et seqq.
7
Adamthwaite (2016), pp. 216 et seqq. and Overy (2016), pp. 99 et seqq.
8
Bowles (2009), p. 127 et seqq. and Overy (2010), pp. 53 et seqq.
9
Conference of Genoa, 10 April–19 May, 1922; Overy (2010), pp. 53 et seqq.
10
The London Economic Conference, 12–27 July 1933; see Clarke (1973), pp. 19 et seqq.
11
See Clarke (1973), p. 2.
12
Haas (1964), pp. 154–155; Troclet (1952), pp. 422 and 710 and Rodgers et al. (2009), pp. 97 et seq.
13
United States, Office of War Information, Division of Public Inquiries (1941) The Atlantic
Charter. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc581/. Accessed 22 Dec 2016.
14 P.-T. Stoll
In the early institutional building after World War II, there was a short moment
when the International Labour Organization was considered to play a major role
also in cooperation for economic policy-making. The so-called Philadelphia Dec-
laration, adopted in 1944 at the 26th International Labour Conference in Philadel-
phia, envisaged that the ILO should play a central role in economic policy-making
by endowing it with a competence to scrutinize the work of other international
economic organizations as to social aspects.20 The declaration reiterates the rele-
vance of social justice for a lasting peace and goes on in stating that
all human beings, irrespective of race, creed or sex, have the right to pursue both their
material well-being and their spiritual development in conditions of freedom and dignity, of
economic security and equal opportunity (II a).
14
The fourth paragraph of the Charter reads: ‘Fourth, [the United Kingdom and the United States]
will endeavor . . . to further the enjoyment by all States, great or small, victor or vanquished, of
access, on equal terms, to the trade and to the raw materials of the world which are needed for their
economic prosperity;’ (emphasis added).
15
The fifth paragraph of the Charter reads: ‘Fifth, they desire to bring about the fullest collabo-
ration between all nations in the economic field with the object of securing, for all, improved labor
standards, economic advancement and social security;’ (emphasis added).
16
Ibid.
17
The sixth paragraph of the Charter reads: ‘Sixth, after the final destruction of the Nazi tyranny,
they hope to see established a peace which will afford to all nations the means of dwelling in safety
within their own boundaries, and which will afford assurance that all the men in all lands may live
out their lives in freedom from fear and want; ‘(emphasis added).
18
The term resurfaces e.g. in the preamble of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
UN GA Res. 217(III) A.
19
Roosevelt (1941).
20
ILO Declaration Concerning the Aims and Purposes of the International Labour Organisation
(Declaration of Philadelphia), adopted on 10 May 1944.
International Economic and Social Dimensions: Divided or Connected? 15
(c) all national and international policies and measures, in particular those of an economic
and financial character, should be judged in this light and accepted only insofar as they may
be held to promote and not to hinder the achievement of this fundamental objective;
(e) in discharging the tasks entrusted to it the International Labour Organization, having
considered all relevant economic and financial factors, may include in its decisions and
recommendations any provisions which it considers appropriate. (II lit. a, b, c, d and e).
The Philadelphia Declaration, which eventually was annexed to the revised ILO
Constitution in 1946, can be seen as a milestone in view of the ILO and its work. It has
importantly broadened the objectives of the organization in applying a more general
and human-rights-type language and in referring to economic security as a broader
term, encompassing both macroeconomic elements as well as a human rights-type
approach.21 However, the aspirations concerning the role of the ILO as voiced in the
declaration were obviously too ambitious and at the same time not specific enough to
materialize. At the time of the adoption of the Philadelphia Declaration, plans were
underway firstly to create much more specific and functional international structures
and secondly to establish a much broader and general international organization,
namely the United Nations.22 Obviously, the protagonists of the United Nations
were eager to equip that organization with the maximum amount of competencies
and were reluctant to give established pre-war institutions much of a say.23
The formation of today’s international system after World War II has particularly
focused on this aspect of economic cooperation, which had been combined from the
very beginning with a social dimension. Alongside to the establishment of the
United Nations, the World Bank Group was founded.24 The International Bank
21
Maul (2012), pp. 83 et seqq. and Monteiro (2014), pp. 213 et seqq.
22
Swepston (2013), pp. 339 et seqq.
23
UN, Report of the Preparatory Commission, 23 Dec 1945, PC/20, pp. 40 et seqq.; Haas (1964),
p. 163 and Meng (2012), Art. 57, paras. 31 et seqq.
24
The World Bank Group is comprised by five institutions: The International Bank for Recon-
struction and Development (IBRD), The International Development Association (IDA), The
International Finance Cooperation (IFC), The Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency
(MIGA) and The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID). See on the
nomenclature Ragazzi (2014), mn. 1 et seq.
16 P.-T. Stoll
for Reconstruction and Development, now known as the World Bank, was
established already in July 1944 as an institution to finance the reconstruction of
those countries and regions devastated by World War II.25 To the more, the World
Bank had a more general mandate to finance development, which today is its main
purpose. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) as established in December 1945
was designed as a mechanism for a joint response to monetary problems.26
The founding documents of both these instruments are noteworthy as they
clearly involve a social element. According to Art. I (III) of its Articles of Agree-
ment,27 the purpose of the World Bank is
[t]o promote the long-range balanced growth of international trade and the maintenance of
equilibrium in balances of payments by encouraging international investment for the
development of the productive resources of members.
Accordingly, Art. I of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement28 set out that the purpose
of the Fund is
(ii) [t]o facilitate the expansion and balanced growth of inter-national trade, and to
contribute thereby to the promotion and maintenance of high levels of employment and
real income and to the development of the productive resources of all members as primary
objectives of economic policy.
Both these institutions were deeply influenced by Keynesian thought and moreover
by John Maynard Keynes in person, who acted as a British delegate in those negoti-
ations.29 As is well known, the inclusion of employment and the raising of incomes
into the agenda of economic policymaking has been one of his most significant
findings.30
The formation of the United Nations as the universal and general organization
follows this pattern. The most visible institutional manifestation of the close link
between economic and social issues certainly has been the establishment of the
25
Articles of Agreement of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 27 Dec
1945, 2 UNTS 134.
26
Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund, 22 July 1944, 2 UNTS 39.
27
See Fn. 26.
28
See Fn. 27.
29
For an overview see e.g. Kitanovic and Kozuharov (2012), pp. 83 et seqq.
30
See for instance: Keynes (1935).
International Economic and Social Dimensions: Divided or Connected? 17
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) as one of the principal organs of the
organization.31 In substantial terms, the link is most importantly reflected by Art.
55 UN Charter, which can be seen as the ‘work programme’ of ECOSOC. It
reiterates the link between peace and economic and social progress as originally
introduced by the ILO Constitution. Moreover, it is much more explicit about
economic aspects, including their social dimension. In this vein, Art. 55 lit. a refers to
higher standards of living, full employment, and conditions of economic and social
progress and development;
and in this way alludes to the Keynesian ideas as reflected in the Articles of
Agreements of the World Bank and the IMF. Art. 55 (b), jointly with Art. 56, calls
for a co-operation in matters of inter alia ‘economic, social, health, and related
problems’ and (c) addresses the issue of human rights.32
In 1948, the General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR),33 which set out the UN human rights agenda for the years to come and can
be seen as a forerunner for the two 1966 United Nations Human Rights Cove-
nants.34 Most importantly and in contrast to the constitutions of many member
States, the UDHR embraces both political and civil as well as economic and social
rights. In the latter regard, it features a number of rights which have a close
connection to labour standards and rights, as is true for instance for the right to
form unions (Art. 23 (4)), the right to equal pay (Art. 23 (2)), the right to rest and
leisure, a reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay
(Art. 24). Furthermore, a number of rights reflect the idea of social security, just as
the right to protection against unemployment (Art. 23 (1)) and the right to a just and
favourable remuneration and means of social protection (Art. 23 (3)). Furthermore
and without a link to labour and employment, the UDHR in the sense of more
general social rights stipulates in Art. 25 (1) a right to an adequate
standard of living (...) including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary
social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability,
widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
31
Art. 61 UN Charter.
32
Stoll (2012), Art 55 (a) and (b), paras. 12–13 and Riedel and Arend (2012), Art 55 (c), para. 8.
33
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UN GA Res. 217(III) A.
34
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 Dec 1966, 993 UNTS 3;
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 Dec 1966, 999 UNTS 171.
18 P.-T. Stoll
here, as it explicitly stipulates ‘social’ rights, and thereby translates ideas of social
justice into individual entitlements.
Within the United Nations and more particularly under the aegis of ECOSOC,
initiatives have been taken to establish an institutional framework and rules for the
world economy in conformity with the more general objectives and principles
voiced by Art. 55 UN Charter.
Driven by quite some optimism as to what world governance may achieve in
international economic relations, an agreement was negotiated in this regard, which
included a number of issues, such as trade, economic development, raw materials and
competition. To implement and administer these rules, an international organization,
named the International Trade Organization was envisaged, which was supposed to
work as a specialized agency under the supervision of ECOSOC.35 This impressive
international instrument, named the Havana Charter,36 did address several pertinent
economic policy issues. This is true for Chapter III on economic development and
reconstruction as well as for Chapter VI on commodities and commodity agreements.
Even more impressive is its chapter II on ‘employment and economic activity’,
which links economic and social dimensions in several ways. Arts. 2 to 6 reflect
contemporary—or more clearly: Keynesian—economic thought by calling for
employment and economic growth and by addressing some particular aspects of
economic policy. The often-cited Art. 7 relates to ‘fair labour standards’ and this
way links to the work of the ILO. The article acknowledges
that measures relating to employment must take fully into account the rights of workers
under inter-governmental declarations, conventions and agreements.
Furthermore, the provision speaks about the ‘common interest of members in the
achievement in maintenance of fair labour standards related to productivity and
thus in the improvement of wages and working conditions as productivity may
permit.’ Also, Art. 7 (1) Havana Charter addresses the linkage to trade in pointing
out that unfair labour conditions may create difficulties in international trade. At
this point, Art.7 Havana Charter called on members to take whatever action may be
appropriate and feasible to eliminate such conditions within its territory. It further-
more envisages consultations and a co-operation with the ILO.37
35
Stoll (2012), Art 55 (a) and (b), para. 44.
36
Havana Charter for an International Trade Organization, 24 March 1948, UN Doc E/CONF.2/78.
37
Art 7 (3) of the Havana Charter reads: ‘In all matters relating to labour standards [. . .] it shall
consult and cooperate with the International Labour Organisation.’
International Economic and Social Dimensions: Divided or Connected? 19
After having been concluded in 1948, the Havana Charter eventually failed after
the US Senate had indicated that it would not ratify the instrument.38
During the negotiations of the Havana Charter, tariff reductions had been agreed
among parties based on reciprocity in the context of the trade chapter of the Charter.
To implement those achievements as early as possible, these tariff reductions, together
with provisions of the trade chapter, were applied provisionally. After it became clear
that the charter would not come into force, those few trade rules, together with the tariff
concessions, were separately framed as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT),39 which did not embody the aforesaid labour-related provisions of the Havana
Charter. The GATT was applied provisionally based on a Protocol on Provisional
Application.40 This development can be seen as a divide, as the GATT and its pro-
visions on the promotion of international trade were applied, whereas the manifold other
provisions of the Havana Charter, which did address ‘social’ aspects, were dropped.
Altogether, the desire to combine economic and social dimensions and to promote
international cooperation in these areas has largely guided the architecture of the post-
war international order. The institutional setup of the United Nations as well as the
World Bank group reflect this desire, based on contemporary economic thought. Even
more, some of the main ideas of social justice and labour standards were translated into
individual entitlements with the UDHR, which guided the further development of the
international human rights system. However, the impressive project to create a more
concrete institutional and normative frame for the world economy along those lines—
the Havana Charter—failed. In a very pragmatic way, a small fragment of the Charter
dealing with trade was separately applied, while the rest of the ambitious project was
dropped. What is more, the World Bank quickly adopted a remarkably narrow
interpretation of its own mandate, striving to isolate financial considerations from
seemingly ‘political’ issues, including labour and human rights issues.41
38
See Sacerdoti (2014), para. 10.
39
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World
Trade Organization, 15 Apr 1994, Annex 1A, 1867 UNTS 187, 33 I.L.M. 1153 (Hereinafter cited
as ‘GATT’).
40
Protocol of Provisional Application of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 30 Oct
1947, 55 UNTS 308.
41
Maupain (2013), pp. 73 et seqq.; Janse (2014) and Cissé (2012), pp. 78 et seqq.
20 P.-T. Stoll
Decolonization quickly became a main issue in the work of the United Nations.42
After having attained their political independence, the new States were heading for
economic independence and development. The formation of a group of developing
countries in the UN General Assembly, the Group of 77, created a strong political
momentum to put the issue of development on the agenda of the UN and to create
new bodies such as UNCTAD and UNDP and many others.43
The four UN development decades and a number of GA declarations set the
scene for a long-lasting process by which developing countries aimed to adapt the
world economy and its rules to accommodate to what they saw as priorities for
development.44 The main concept behind this development agenda can be seen as a
‘social’ one, as it was based on an idea of a responsibility of the state community or
more specifically of the developed countries to assist developing countries by
financial and other means and to cooperate with a view to change the rules for
international economic activities to the benefit of developing countries.45
Development in those days was primarily defined with a view to the national
economy and macroeconomic parameters such as the gross national product,
economic growth and the per capita income of the population. The closing of the
‘gap’ between developed and developing countries was taken as a major benchmark
in the various decisions and texts at the time. Also, development was seen in the
context of independence, and thus had a strong link to sovereignty. In terms of
theory, the gap-theory, the dependencia-theory and several postmarxist approaches
were quite influential.46 Particularly the dependencia-theory is worth mentioning,
as it saw developing countries as being dependent on an unjust world economic
order. In this way, the existing international economic system was considered to
42
See i.e. Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, 14 Dec
1960, UN GA A/RES/15/1514.
43
Fabbricotti (2009); Fortin (2013) and Schoiswohl (2013).
44
It nevertheless had the effect of mobilizing them to obtain reforms and concessions, often in the
form of UN General Assembly resolutions: Resolution 1710 (XVI), 19 Dec 1961; Resolution 2626
(XXV), 24 Oct 1970; Resolution 35/56, 5 Dec 1980 and Resolution 45/199, 21 Dec 1990
concerning the Development Decades; Resolutions 3201 (S-VI) and 3202 (S-VI), 1 May 1974
on the New International Economic Order; Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States,
Resolution 3281 (XXIX), 12 Dec 1974; Resolution 3362 (S-VII), 16 Sep 1975 on development and
international economic co-operation and Resolution 34/150, 17 Dec 1979 on the principles of the
new international economic order. But in 1986, the developing countries did not succeed in
winning general acceptance or recognition of the right to development, GA Res 41/128,
4 Dec 1986.
45
See for instance Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, GA Res. 3281 (XXIX),
12 Dec 1974.
46
James (1997), pp. 205 et seqq.
International Economic and Social Dimensions: Divided or Connected? 21
represent a double standard of morality, a term which clearly alludes to the question
of social justice.
In substance, the concept of development in those days focused on industriali-
zation,47 while other issues such as agriculture or the basic needs of individuals
were only added later. The issue of labour conditions was hardly ever mentioned. In
view of the international economy, the discussions focused on whether developing
countries should become an integrated part of the world economy, what benefits
they could achieve this way and how their situation could be improved.48 Besides
industrialization in general, one relevant point in this regard was the export of
commodities; in respect of which several details were discussed, including the
stabilization of commodity prices, trade policy, the shipment of such commodities,
competition issues, investment for extractive activities, and the role and conduct of
multinational enterprises.49 The declaration on the permanent sovereignty over
natural resources50 was a major cornerstone in this regard, which was later
complemented by the Declaration and Programme of Action of a New International
Economic Order51 and by the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States.52
This period of the development of international economic law with its focus on
development saw some achievements. One such achievement was the granting of
preferential market access for developing countries in the context of GATT,53 by
GATT decisions addressing economic development and the special and differential
treatment of developing countries,54 including the insertion of a Chapter IV to
GATT and the adoption of the enabling clause.55 Another was the establishment of
UNCTAD’s commodity programme.56 Furthermore, codes on restrictive business
47
Yusuf (2009), pp. 5 et seqq.
48
See e.g. World Bank, World Development Report 1978.
49
Ibid. pp. 19 et seq.
50
GA Res. 3281 (XVII), 12 Dec 1974.
51
GA Res. 3281 (XXIX), 12 Dec 1974 and GA Res. 3202 (S-VI), 1 May 1974.
52
Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, GA Res. 3281 (XXIX), 29 Sess., 12 Dec 1974,
UN Doc. A/RES/29/3281.
53
Especially concerning the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) and the concept of Special
and Differential Treatment. See also: WTO Committee on Trade and Development (2013) Special
and Differential Treatment Provisions in WTO Agreements and Decisions, WT/COMTD/W/196.
54
See e.g. Report of the Review Working Party (1955) Quantitative Restrictions, BISD III, Supp
170 and Report of the Review Working Party (1955) Schedules and Customs Administration,
BISD III, Supp 205. Furthermore, see Committee on Trade and Development (1980) Note by the
Secretariat, COMTD/W/311. See as an example WTO, India – Quantitive Restrictions on Imports
of Agricultural, Textile and Industrial Products, Report of the Panel, 6 April 1999, WT/DS90/R.
Tortora (2003), p. 5.
55
World Trade Organization (1979) Differential and More Favourable Treatment: Reciprocity and
Fuller Participation of Developing Countries, WTO Doc No L/4903; see also: http://www.wto.org/
english/docs-e/legal-e/enabling-e.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2016.
56
UNCTAD, Integrated Programme for Commodities, 30 May 1976, TD/RES/93 (IV).
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
A Killing Play
About this time the Valkyrie and Rhinegold had been given at the
Court Theatre in Munich (1869–1870). The King gave up his plan to
build a new theatre for these stupendous works, which needed
special machinery because of the elaborate stage effects. Wagner
insisted that scenery was as important as the words and music. So he
started to build, by general subscription over all Europe, a theatre at
Bayreuth. He succeeded so well that not only did Europe contribute
but America, too, and groups of people banded together to collect
money for it. Wagner was now the fashion and finally the new opera
house opened August 13th, 1876, with The Ring, for he had finished
Die Götterdämmerung the year before.
Artistically it was successful but not financially. If his pen had been
dipped in honey and not in bitters, he would have won his public
more easily, but he seemed unable to be diplomatic. So off he went to
London and other places to conduct concerts to make money to pay
the debts of his new theatre. Later he wrote the Festival March, for
the Philadelphia Centennial (1876), which helped financially.
The people were divided into two camps,—those for Wagner, and
those against him. So strong was the feeling, that during the 1880’s,
in Germany, signs in cafés read: “It is forbidden to discuss religion or
Wagner”! The proprietors wished to save their chairs and china
which the fists of their patrons would destroy.
Parsifal
After reading about the feats of the Wizard it is not surprising that he
had many followers,—those who openly claimed to take him for an
example, and others who did not realize how much they received
from him and would not like to have been called his followers!
Verdi—The Grand Old Man of Italy
He did not compose an opera until 1839 when his Oberto in the
style of Bellini was produced in Milan with such success that he
received orders to write three more from which he gained much
good-will and fame.
It must have been a thrilling time for opera writers, because
Wagner was composing, too, and you know the great excitement he
caused. Amidst this interesting whirl of opinion, Verdi wrote one of
the operas ordered by the Milan director, and during this time he
was sorely stricken by the deaths of his wife and two lovely children.
Besides this, his opera failed and in his discouragement the poor
young man made up his mind to give up composition. However, a
rare good friend coaxed him back to his work after a little rest, and
he produced his successful Nebucco (Nebuchadnezzar) (1842), I
Lombardi the next year and his well known Ernani (1844). In this,
his first period, he used as models, Bellini and men of his type, not
writing anything startlingly new.
In his second period he wrote operas nearly as fast as we write
school compositions, and among the famous things are Rigoletto
(1851), Il Trovatore, La Traviata (story from Dumas’ Camille or
Dame aux Camelias), (1853), and The Masked Ball (1859). Ernani
and Rigoletto are founded on stories by Victor Hugo. The first
performance of La Traviata in Venice was a failure due more to the
performers, than to the opera itself which still crowds opera houses
of the world.
The greatest opera of his third period is Aida (1871), one of Verdi’s
masterpieces. An opera on an Egyptian subject was ordered by the
Khedive of Egypt for the opening of the Italian Opera House in Cairo,
for which Verdi received $20,000. Mariette Bey a famous
Egyptologist made the first sketch in order to give the right local
atmosphere to the libretto. Curiosity ran so high that every seat was
sold before the first night and it was a great success. Think how
electrified the audience must have been by the tenor solo, “Celeste
Aida,” one of Caruso’s greatest successes; by the realistic Nile scene;
the voice of the priestess in the mammoth Egyptian temple, and the
famous march with trumpets made specially for it!
Dear old lovable Verdi was a wise man as well as an accomplished
composer. He used more modern methods in Aida to hold audiences
who were hearing about Wagner and his startling innovations.
Other operas of this third period were La Forza del Destino and
one given at the Paris Grand Opera, Don Carlos, which was not up to
his standard. Until this time he showed great mechanical skill and a
sense of color and melody. The great singers have revelled in the
operas of his second period. In our day Marcella Sembrich, Nellie
Melba, Frieda Hempel, Luisa Tetrazzini, Amelita Galli-Curci,
Florence Macbeth and many others have sung the coloratura,—frilly,
soaring, gymnastic-singing, still very popular. However in Aida,
Verdi departed much from the usual, and people said that he was
copying Wagner, because they didn’t know the difference between
the influences which change a person’s ways, and imitation.
So he deserted the old models, Auber, Meyerbeer and Halévy for
something more substantial, his deeper and gigantically conceived
Aida. James Wolfe of the Metropolitan Opera said of the bigness of
this work as produced at the Metropolitan Opera House in New
York: “I have played before audiences of 30,000 in arenas in Mexico.
I am so at home in the opera that I do cross-word puzzles waiting for
my cue, and yet at the Metropolitan when I first played the King in
Aida with its flaming music, its hundreds of people and its scores of
horses, I was over-awed and frightened!”
After this, Verdi’s splendid mass, The Requiem, was written for the
death of the Italian hero Manzoni. In it he approaches the German
school in depth and seriousness, veering away from the emptiness of
Italian writing.
In his last efforts he seems definitely influenced by Wagner; for,
with his Otello and Falstaff we find a new Verdi, surpassing in form
and sincere melody anything that he had done. He was very
fortunate to have Arrigo Boito, his friend, to write librettos based on
Shakespeare’s Othello and Merry Wives of Windsor. When Falstaff
was given in New York (1925) a young American baritone, Lawrence
Tibbet, in the rôle of Ford, flashed into fame.