The Ujamaa Apartments

Nestled in the heart of New Amani, a bustling metropolis in the Republic of Shakah,
stood the sprawling Green Pastures slum. For decades, it housed a vibrant community
of over 500 families, many of whom had built their lives and raised their children
within its confines. However, the Green Pastures' ramshackle dwellings lacked basic
amenities like sanitation and proper infrastructure. Sanitation woes were particularly
pressing, posing a significant health risk to residents.
To address this issue, the government of Shakah through Amani Housing Authority
(AHA), a government parastatal unveiled the ambitious Ujamaa Apartments project.
This multi-million-dollar initiative envisioned the construction of 400 high-quality,
affordable apartments on the very site currently occupied by Green Pastures. The
project promised not only improved living conditions but also a potential economic
boost to the area.
The announcement, however, was met with mixed reactions. Residents of Green
Pastures, while acknowledging the need for better housing, were apprehensive. The
AHA's resettlement plan offered meagre compensation and relocation to a distant,
underdeveloped area with limited access to schools and jobs. Many residents felt this
would disrupt their livelihoods and sever their social ties.
Adding fuel to the fire, rumors swirled that the new apartments wouldn't be readily
available to the displaced community. Whispers suggested priority would be given to
government officials and wealthy individuals, effectively pushing the legitimate
residents to the back of the queue.
Discontent soon morphed into action. Residents formed the Green Pastures
Community Action Group (GPCAG). Led by the charismatic Mama Amani, a respected
elder, they organized peaceful protests outside the AHA headquarters. Chanting
slogans and holding placards, the GPCAG demanded fair compensation, the right to
return to the new development after resettlement, and a transparent allocation
process.
The protests attracted media attention, placing pressure on the AHA. However, the
authority remained steadfast. They argued the project was crucial for public health and
the economic development of the area. While they assured fair compensation and a
relocation plan, details remained vague.
Unconvinced, the GPCAG decided to take legal action. Their lawyer, Ms. Ndlovu, a
human rights advocate, advised filing a petition in the High Court. She argued the
AHA's actions violated the residents' right to property, a fundamental right enshrined in
the Amani constitution. Furthermore, Ms. Ndlovu contended the relocation plan
infringed on their right to a decent standard of living. She also raised concerns about
the rumors regarding the allocation of apartments, suggesting potential discrimination
based on socio-economic status.
Meanwhile, the AHA countered by arguing for the court's deference to their expertise in
urban planning and development. They maintained the project served the greater
public good and the relocation plan, while imperfect, was the best solution under the
circumstances. They downplayed the rumors of discrimination, claiming a transparent
allocation process would be implemented.

1
Issues for Consideration
Was the High Court the appropriate forum for the GPCAG to challenge the AHA's
actions? Should this be addressed in a lower court first?
Does the AHA's displacement plan constitute a violation of the Green Pastures
residents' right to property?
Does the relocation plan adequately address the right to a decent standard of living?
Does the Amani constitution's guarantee of equality protect the residents from
potential socio-economic discrimination in the allocation of apartments?
Do the GPCAG's protests fall under the right to assembly and demonstration? Can the
AHA restrict these protests in any way?
The Republic of Shakah is a country, whose legal system replicates that of Kenya.
Additionally, the Republic of Shakah has ratified the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights (ICCPR).