Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Download PDF) Complete Revision Guide For Mrcog Part 2 Sbas and Emqs 3Rd Edition Justin C Konje Author Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Complete Revision Guide For Mrcog Part 2 Sbas and Emqs 3Rd Edition Justin C Konje Author Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/complete-revision-guide-for-
mrcog-part-3-1st-edition-justin-c-konje/
https://textbookfull.com/product/get-through-mrcog-
part-2-emqs-2nd-edition-kalaivani-ramalingam-author/
https://textbookfull.com/product/single-best-answers-sbas-for-
the-mrcs-part-a-a-bailey-love-revision-guide-second-edition-
chowdhury/
https://textbookfull.com/product/fullstack-vue-3-the-complete-
guide-to-vue-js-2-revision-13-edition-hassan-djirdeh/
Osces for the Mrcs Part B: A Bailey & Love Revision
Guide Second Edition Chowdhury
https://textbookfull.com/product/osces-for-the-mrcs-part-b-a-
bailey-love-revision-guide-second-edition-chowdhury/
https://textbookfull.com/product/osces-for-the-mrcs-part-b-a-
bailey-love-revision-guide-jonathan-m-fishman/
https://textbookfull.com/product/get-through-mrcog-
part-3-clinical-assessment-second-edition-chu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/get-through-mrcog-
part-3-clinical-assessment-second-edition-chu-2/
https://textbookfull.com/product/get-through-mrcog-part-1-2nd-
edition-rekha-wuntakal-author/
Complete Revision Guide
for MRCOG Part 2
SBAs and EMQs
Third Edition
Justin C. Konje FWACS, FMCOG (Nig), FRCOG, MD, MBA, LLB, PgCert Med Ed
Emeritus Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Leicester, UK
Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Qatar
Senior Attending Physician
Sidra Medical College, Qatar
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
52 Vanderbilt Avenue,
New York, NY 10017
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. While all reasonable
efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, neither the author[s] nor the publisher can
accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publishers wish
to make clear that any views or opinions expressed in this book by individual editors, authors or contributors
are personal to them and do not necessarily reflect the views/opinions of the publishers. The information or
guidance contained in this book is intended for use by medical, scientific or health-care professionals and is
provided strictly as a supplement to the medical or other professional’s own judgement, their knowledge of the
patient’s medical history, relevant manufacturer’s instructions and the appropriate best practice guidelines.
Because of the rapid advances in medical science, any information or advice on dosages, procedures or diagnoses
should be independently verified. The reader is strongly urged to consult the relevant national drug formulary
and the drug companies’ and device or material manufacturers’ printed instructions, and their websites, before
administering or utilizing any of the drugs, devices or materials mentioned in this book. This book does not
indicate whether a particular treatment is appropriate or suitable for a particular individual. Ultimately it is the
sole responsibility of the medical professional to make his or her own professional judgements, so as to advise
and treat patients appropriately. The authors and publishers have also attempted to trace the copyright holders
of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this
form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so
we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or
utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including
photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written
permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com
(http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive,
Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration
for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system
of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only
for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
Preface iv
Abbreviations vi
Author ix
Introduction 1
SBA Questions 9
SBA Answers 91
Index 369
Preface
The Membership of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist (MRCOG) examination
remains one of the most internationally recognized postgraduate examinations in the specialty.
For those training in the UK, it is an essential requirement to progress from intermediate to
advanced training. While it is not an exit examination in the UK, it assesses quality of training
and clinical standards hence highly regarded and popular not only in the UK but in most parts of
the world.
Over the years, the examination has evolved in keeping with changes in medical education. In the
previous edition of this book, Part 2 – then the ultimate examination for the award of MRCOG –
consisted of true and false multiple-choice questions, extended matching questions (EMQs), short
answer questions and an oral examination popularly referred to as the OSCE. In the intervening
years, the MRCOG Part 2 has rightly been uncoupled into Parts 2 and 3. The Part 2 examination
has also itself changed and now consists of two papers made up of Single Best Answer (SBA)
questions and EMQs; the new Part 3 consists of 14 tasks, each assessing one of the 14 core modules
in the curriculum.
An important part of training and preparing for the ultimate role of a senior physician in the
specialty is that of sifting the plethora of material that is readily available to identify the best
evidence that would underlie any good clinical practice. This is the basis for the MRCOG
examination being driven by evidence – all the questions in the exams have to be supported by
robust and defendable evidence. This means examiners and trainers must use the best evidence for
setting questions and preparing for exams. This is a welcome and very positive direction of travel
and one that must be applauded.
In revising this book, I recognize that one of the unmet needs of trainees is a book that provides
enough material to guide their preparations and provide some reality check to the standards of the
examination. This book provides precisely that. It is a combination of two books in one – the first
part consists of 400 SBA questions (200 in Obstetrics and 200 in Gynaecology) and the second part
consists of 400 EMQs (200 in Obstetrics and 200 in Gynaecology). I have grouped these into papers,
so that by the time you have finished working through this book, you will have had the ‘experience’
of at least four diets of the examination.
In this edition, I have kept the concepts of the last edition, once again giving general advice on
how to prepare for the exams and also discussing the reasons why trainees fail the examination.
I must state here that the contents of the book, including the statements and interpretation of
evidence, are personal and I accept responsibility for inaccuracies and mistakes. It is important that
you verify whatever information is given in this book and also accept that there will be errors –
some of which will be glaring omissions and others the result of misinterpretation on my part.
I hope that this book is useful not only to trainees but also to trainers and examiners who
will find the content useful in guiding trainees and in helping them generate good questions for
examinations.
iv
PrEfAcE
This has been one of the most difficult tasks to undertake, probably because I am getting older
or because I set myself very high standards and struggled to meet them. All of this would not have
been possible without the amazing support I have had from my family. They have endured hours
and hours on end of me sitting in front of the computer at home and tapping on keys. I am sure
that finally closing this chapter will be a welcome to them. Thank you, Mrs. Joan Kila Konje, for
not only being an adorable and best wife but also for being very understanding, encouraging and
not losing your cool too often. Thanks to my wonderful kids – Dr. Swiri Konje, Monique Konje
and Justin Jr. Konje – for bearing with your dad and not complaining too much about ignoring you
and not being in touch too often. I could not have wished for better children. I am truly blessed.
I am most grateful to God, my creator and our Almighty Father in Heaven for giving me belief and
patience. This would not have been possible without His blessings. Finally, I would like to thank the
publisher for being so patient with me.
Visit emedicalcourses.com for additional supporting material.
Justin C. Konje
v
Abbreviations
vi
ABBrEvIAtIonS
vii
ABBrEvIAtIonS
viii
Author
Justin C. Konje (FWACS, FMCOG (Nig), FRCOG, MD, MBA, LLB, PgCert Med Ed) is senior
attending physician at Sidra Medicine and professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at Weill Cornell
Medical College, Doha, Qatar. Prior to joining Sidra, Dr. Konje was a professor of obstetrics and
gynaecology and honorary consultant at the University of Leicester and University Hospitals of
Leicester NHS Trust, UK. He is trained in maternal-fetal medicine, and developed and directed the
training program and services at the University Hospitals of Leicester, UK, for 10 years. He also
has an interest in minimal access surgery, having led the service at his previous unit with particular
interest in the management of complex endometriosis. Dr. Konje has published over 180 peer-
reviewed papers, several textbooks and chapters in reference textbooks. His research interests are in
fetal physiology and growth, endocannabinoids in human reproduction, endometriosis and recurrent
miscarriages and implantation failure. He has supervised over 10 PhDs and collaborated in various
research programs both in the United Kingdom and internationally. He is passionate about teaching
both at undergraduate and postgraduate levels having served as a tutor at the Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), London, UK. He was the head of the Postgraduate
School of Obstetrics and Gynecology for 5 years – a post he left to join Sidra. He has developed and
runs the most popular and successful MRCOG Part II Revision Course which attracts candidates
from all over the world. Dr. Konje has served as an external examiner to several universities all over
the world, delivered several invited lectures and also served on the Examination Committee of the
RCOG both as member and chair of one of the committees. He was an International Representative
on the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Council for 4 years where he also sits
on the Global Health Board. He is on the editorial board of several journals, the CPD editor for
The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist and the section editor for the European Journal of Obstetrics
and Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology.
ix
Introduction
1
IntroductIon
surgery. I would therefore recommend that you identify a standard textbook as a reference and one
that will complement your reading of the RCOG education material.
Finally, I strongly recommend that you consider identifying a revision course to attend. It is
most likely that a good course will focus your preparation and also provide insights of your weak-
nesses. It is best to do this 2–3 months before the exams. Some candidates prefer to attend a course
6–9 months before the exams, but, in that case, there is the danger of burning out as you prepare for
the exam over a very long period of time.
In this day of technology, there are several electronic sources for candidates. A word of caution –
be careful about where you base your preparations on. The only reliable and perhaps well-vetted
site is that of the RCOG. Other sites are based on individual opinions and do not necessarily reflect
those of the RCOG.
Finally, the patient is the best teacher for your exams. A busy clinical job exposes you to many
teaching opportunities, and you must take advantage of them. Every patient you encounter/see in
the clinic, on the wards, delivery suite (labour ward), or in the theatres is a potential Extended
Matching Question (EMQ) or an SBA. Examiners – including myself – commonly use our clinics
or patient encounters to set these questions. To make the best of these learning opportunities, work
with your clinical/education leads and senior trainees, especially those who have recently been suc-
cessful at the exams. Every unit also has mandatory training sessions – ensure that you see each of
them as an opportunity to cover an area of the curriculum for the exams.
2
IntroductIon
SBA paper. The EMQ component of the exams makes up 60% of the total marks, and there-
fore, you should also spend 60% of the total time on the EMQs and 40% on the SBAs.
6. Failure to follow instructions: although this is uncommon, from time to time, candidates fail
because they have not followed simple examination instructions, e.g. on completing the answer
sheets. Be very vigilant and ensure that you mark the answer on the sheet that corresponds to
the question.
3
IntroductIon
5. If your options are not on the list, you should look for the one closest to your option.
Narrowing your answer is an art that you must learn to master. Some clues to this are pro-
vided in (7).
6. If none of the options in the list is close to yours, you should start the process of elimination.
It is likely that, of the 10–25 options you may have for each question, not more than 5–6 will be
applicable to the particular scenario or vignette. The only problem with this approach is time
constraints.
7. For the questions where you are struggling, you will need to guess. The first step in this process
is to narrow down the options. You should initially look at all the information on offer. Use
the pointers offered in the vignettes to narrow down the potential answers and return to the
modified list for further, more refined thinking. Similarly, do not be caught by the distracters
slipped into statements and/or options. The difficulty with this approach is time – you only
have limited time per question. You should therefore not do this until you have finished all the
questions whose answers are quite obvious to you.
4
IntroductIon
Keyword Meaning
Never/exclusively/always There are no exceptions
Could/possibly/may May apply under certain circumstances
Essential feature Required to confirm diagnosis
Occurs/recognized feature/recognized A reported occurrence irrespective of frequency
association
Characteristic/frequently/likely Implies a frequency greater than 50%
Pathognomonic Specific to a particular disease/condition
It should now be possible to apply your understanding of these words to the various questions espe-
cially those where you have to guess. Below is some guidance on how to use these words in arriving
at possible correct answers where you are unsure or have no clues.
• Questions which include ‘never, always, exclusively’ are generally false (but be careful as
there are exceptions).
• Questions which include the keywords ‘could, possible, may’ are often true (again beware of
the exceptions).
• Statistics – When questions have exact statistic, they are more likely to be wrong (different
studies produce different figures). This does not apply to statistics given as >…% or <…%,
approximately, estimates, or as a range.
Both candidates and some clinical leads/education leads often confuse SBA questions with
True-and-False answer questions. In this type of question, it is not about being correct or wrong;
it is about which of the answers is the best. A good SBA question should have at least two pos-
sible correct answers, although this is often not easy to generate. The candidate’s task is there-
fore to select what is not only a good answer but also the best answer from the given options.
One answer is always better than the others. Therefore, it is critical that you read through all
the options before making your choice. Remember, you do not get any points for selecting the
second-best answer. If the choice you want to select seems (only) partially correct, then it is
entirely wrong. On many occasions, the correct answer usually occurs to the reader after read-
ing the stem.
In setting questions, most experts would have been schooled on what to avoid and what to include
to increase in-depth thinking by examinees before selecting the correct option. While this is the case
most of the time, it is inevitable that some of the questions will still enable the test-wise candidates
to second-guess the correct answers. In the next paragraphs, some clues are provided to examinees
on how to improve the chances of getting questions right when you are either clueless or unsure.
Examiners tend to include statements/phrases in questions/answers in an attempt to divert the
examinees’ attention from the correct answer or from the main thrust of the question. These are
commonly referred to as distractors. Their purpose is to ‘distract’ – i.e. to get you to pick them
rather than the best answer. Each distractor is most likely to be selected by one or more candidates;
otherwise, they would not be included as an option. It is likely that every option may fool someone
and you must make sure that you are not that person. Why should these be included in questions?
5
IntroductIon
Remember that this is a clinical examination often reflecting clinical scenarios. For example, it is
not uncommon to see a patient in the clinic or as an emergency and be ‘distracted’ by a symptom or
sign that on occasions leads to the wrong diagnosis.
In general, most distractors in the options would seem plausible and few will stand out as obvi-
ously incorrect. Some may indeed be partially correct answers but not necessarily the best answer.
Some of the reasons why candidates easily select distractors include misconceptions, incomplete
knowledge, and faulty reasoning.
Where you are clueless or uncertain, apply the following tips to your choice of answers.
1. Grammatical cues: Where one or more distractors do not follow grammatically from the stem
(i.e. the stem and some distractors are not congruous). For example, a stem ends in ‘an’ and
only some options begin with a vowel or the stem points to the answer.
2. Word repeats: Where the same word or phrase is included in both the stem and the correct
answer. This gives away the answer.
3. Absolute terms: When terms such as ‘always’ and ‘never’ are used, they are rarely correct.
Vaguer terms such as ‘may’ or ‘could’ are much more likely to be correct.
4. Logical cues: Where a group of options is logically exhaustive, indicating that the answer is
one of the groups, for example, including three options: ‘greater than’, ‘same as’, and ‘less than’
in a five-option question. You will also not find logically exhaustive options when one of the
options is nonsensical.
5. Convergence strategy: The correct answer can be ‘worked out’ as it has most in common with
other options (i.e. the correct answer includes most of the elements in common with the other
options). This is much more subtle but common.
6. Long correct answers: One option is obviously longer than the others. Efforts are made to
ensure that the correct answer is longer, more specific, or more complex than the other options.
7. Word association links: Here, the correct answer can be arrived at by simple word associa-
tion without a deeper understanding of the topic. For example, ‘female genital mutilation’ and
‘post-traumatic stress’ can be associated. However, in a diagnostic stem about a female genital
mutilation, the correct answer may well be some other condition.
1. Read the stem and ensure that you have a thorough understanding of the ask (i.e. what is being
asked by the question?).
2. Three scenarios are likely after you have read the stem/question:
a. The answer is obvious and you do not have to look at the options to decide.
b. You have an idea of what the answer ought to be but are unsure (in this case, care must be
taken of the distractors).
c. You are completely lost (i.e. do not know the answer and have no clue).
3. If you know the answer and it is in the options, select that and DO NOT change your mind.
The more you rationalize the answer, the more likely you are going to change your mind and
get it wrong. This is more likely when you start extrapolating the information given to every
possible scenario.
4. When you are unsure of the answer but have two options, it may be worthwhile identifying
these options and coming back after you have attempted other questions. It is not uncommon
for one or more questions to trigger your memory and help refine the answer to a previous
question.
6
SBA QuEStIonS – SBA oBStEtrIcS: PAPEr I
46. What advice should a woman who had breast cancer and wishes to conceive after com-
pleting her course of tamoxifen but has been found on imaging to have suspicious metas-
tases in the lungs be given?
A. Can conceive provided she has been off tamoxifen for 3 months
B. That pregnancy is contraindicated until after treatment
C. To avoid pregnancy as life expectancy is limited and treatment of metastasis will be
compromised
D. To delay pregnancy for 12 months to allow for treatment of the metastasis
E. Will be able to have chemotherapy and continue with pregnancy provided she is not given
chemotherapy for the first 3 months
47. A 24-year-old woman is admitted at 30 weeks of gestation with regular uterine contrac-
tions. This is her first pregnancy and until now the pregnancy has been uncomplicated.
She is examined, and the cervix is found to be soft with a closed os. A decision is taken
to give her a course of corticosteroids and to commence her on the tocolytic nifedipine.
What is the benefit of giving her nifedipine?
A. Associated with a reduction in the incidence of preterm delivery/birth
B. Associated with improved mortality
C. Associated with improved neonatal morbidity
D. Associated with improved perinatal morbidity
E. Prolongs the pregnancy by 2–7 days
48. A woman books for antenatal care at 8 weeks of gestation in her first pregnancy. What is
the recommendation with regard to testing for blood group and antibodies?
A. Test blood group and antibody at booking and then at 28 weeks of gestation
B. Test blood group and antibody at booking and then antibody at 28 weeks
C. Test blood group and antibody at booking, 28 and 36 weeks
D. Test blood group and antibody at booking and then blood group at 28 weeks
E. Test blood group and antibody at booking and 28 weeks and then antibody at 36 weeks
49. What is severe postpartum haemorrhage?
A. Blood loss of more than 1000 mL
B. Blood loss of more than 1500 mL
C. Blood loss of more than 2000 mL
D. Blood loss of more than 2500 mL
E. Blood loss of more than 3000 mL
50. What is the most common cause of primary postpartum haemorrhage?
A. Disorders of thrombin
B. Disorders of tissues
C. Disorders of tone
D. Disorders of trauma
E. Disorders of trauma and thrombin
18
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
—one of the best known in Paris as well as St. Petersburg and
Vienna. Immediately I wanted to know everything about him. He on
his side wished me to tell him all sorts of things of which I had never
even dreamed. We were at once on terms of delightful intimacy.
A short time after I was obliged to leave Nice. Just as my train
was about to go, my good friend jumped into my carriage and
accompanied me as far as Marseilles. There he bade me adieu and
returned to Nice.
Letter writing followed, in the course of which he told me how
highly he regarded my friendship—more highly in fact than anything
else in the world. For my part I thought of him more often than I
should care to confess, but I had my wits about me sufficiently to
announce to him, at the cost of a great effort of will, that he was too
young for our feelings of regard for each other to continue without
danger to both, and that he ought to forget me.
Just at this time there was presented to me a viscount, who laid
claim to my heart and hand. Need I confess that, with my eyes still
filled with pictures of the other man, I could not endure his assiduous
importunity. No one is deafer, says a French proverb, than who he is
unwilling to hear. And the viscount would not listen to my
discouraging remarks.
He seemed to have imposed upon himself, in spite of my rebuffs,
which were often severe and always discourteous, the task of
bringing me to terms. Undoubtedly, in spite of my reserve and
coldness, he might eventually have succeeded if one fine evening he
had not dropped out altogether under threat of legal proceedings. He
had a well-established reputation as a swindler.
During the time when the viscount was playing his game to win
my affections, my good friend’s communications stopped coming. I
wrote him several letters. They were never answered.
Some years later, in 1900, I had installed my theatre, as is
perhaps still remembered, at the Universal Exposition in Paris.
One day as I was on my way to the theatre I saw at a distance
my lover of the days at Nice. My heart began to beat violently.
My friend approached. We were going to pass each other. He
had not yet seen me; for he was walking with his eyes on the
ground. Standing still, with my left hand restraining the beating of my
heart, I waited, feasting my eyes upon him. He turned his head and
passed me.
I was destined not to see him again for a long time.
Meantime, indeed, I learned through a third person that he had
told his father of his desire to marry me. A violent scene took place
between the two men. The father threatened to disinherit him. The
poor boy was sent away, almost by main force, on a voyage round
the world.
I have frequently reflected since then on the part the “viscount”
played in all this affair, and I should not be astonished to learn that
he led some artful embassy against His Majesty King Love.
XVII
SOME PHILOSOPHERS