You are on page 1of 3

No true Scotsman

No true Scotsman or appeal to purity is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect an a
posteriori claim from a falsifying counterexample by covertly modifying the initial claim.[1][2][3] Rather than
admitting error or providing evidence that would disqualify the falsifying counterexample, the claim is
modified into an a priori claim in order to definitionally exclude the undesirable counterexample.[4] The
modification is signalled by the use of non-substantive rhetoric such as "true", "pure", "genuine",
"authentic", "real", etc.[2]

Philosophy professor Bradley Dowden explains the fallacy as an "ad hoc rescue" of a refuted generalization
attempt.[1] The following is a simplified rendition of the fallacy:[5]

Person A: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."


Person B: "But my uncle Angus is a Scotsman and he puts sugar on his porridge."
Person A: "But no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."

Occurrence
The "no true Scotsman" fallacy is committed when the arguer satisfies the following conditions:[6][3][4]

not publicly retreating from the initial, falsified a posteriori assertion


offering a modified assertion that definitionally excludes a targeted unwanted
counterexample
using rhetoric to signal the modification
An appeal to purity is commonly associated with protecting a preferred group. Scottish national pride may
be at stake if someone regularly considered to be Scottish commits a heinous crime. To protect people of
Scottish heritage from a possible accusation of guilt by association, one may use this fallacy to deny that the
group is associated with this undesirable member or action. "No true Scotsman would do something so
undesirable"; i.e., the people who would do such a thing are tautologically (definitionally) excluded from
being part of our group such that they cannot serve as a counterexample to the group's good nature.[4]

Origin and philosophy


The description of the fallacy in this form is attributed to British philosopher Antony Flew, who wrote, in
his 1966 book God & Philosophy,

In this ungracious move a brash generalization, such as No Scotsmen put sugar on their porridge,
when faced with falsifying facts, is transformed while you wait into an impotent tautology: if
ostensible Scotsmen put sugar on their porridge, then this is by itself sufficient to prove them not
true Scotsmen.

—Antony Flew

In his 1975 book Thinking About Thinking, Flew wrote:[4]


Imagine some Scottish chauvinist settled down one Sunday morning with his customary copy of
The News of the World. He reads the story under the headline, "Sidcup Sex Maniac Strikes
Again". Our reader is, as he confidently expected, agreeably shocked: "No Scot would do such a
thing!" Yet the very next Sunday he finds in that same favourite source a report of the even more
scandalous on-goings of Mr Angus McSporran in Aberdeen. This clearly constitutes a counter
example, which definitively falsifies the universal proposition originally put forward. ('Falsifies'
here is, of course, simply the opposite of 'verifies'; and it therefore means 'shows to be false'.)
Allowing that this is indeed such a counter example, he ought to withdraw; retreating perhaps to a
rather weaker claim about most or some. But even an imaginary Scot is, like the rest of us,
human; and none of us always does what we ought to do. So what he is in fact saying is: "No
true Scotsman would do such a thing!"

The essayist David P. Goldman, writing under his pseudonym "Spengler", compared distinguishing
between "mature" democracies, which never start wars, and "emerging democracies", which may start
them, with the "no true Scotsman" fallacy. Spengler alleges that political scientists have attempted to save
the "US academic dogma" that democracies never start wars against other democracies from
counterexamples by declaring any democracy which does indeed start a war against another democracy to
be flawed, thus maintaining that no true and mature democracy starts a war against a fellow democracy.[5]

Author Steven Pinker suggested that phrases like "no true Christian ever kills, no true communist state is
repressive and no true Trump supporter endorses violence" exemplify the fallacy.[7]

See also
Ad hoc hypothesis Moving the goalposts
Begging the question Persuasive definition
Democrat in Name Only Reification (fallacy)
Epistemic commitment Republican in Name Only
Equivocation Special pleading
Gatekeeping Tautology (language)
List of fallacies True Pole
Loaded language Whataboutism

References
1. "Fallacies" (https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved
2022-02-09.
2. Curtis, Gary N. "The No-True-Scotsman Fallacy" (http://www.fallacyfiles.org/scotsman.html).
Fallacy Files. Retrieved 2016-11-12.
3. Antony Flew, God & Philosophy, p. 104 (https://archive.org/details/godphilosophy0000flew/p
age/104/mode/2up), Hutchinson, 1966.
4. Antony Flew (1975). Thinking About Thinking (or, Do I Sincerely Want to be Right?) (https://b
ooks.google.com/books?id=15KwAAAAIAAJ&q=%22No%20true%20Scotsman%22).
Fontana/Collins. p. 47. ISBN 9780006335801.
5. Goldman, David P. (31 Jan 2006). "No true Scotsman starts a war" (https://web.archive.org/w
eb/20190105005853/http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HA31Ak01.html). Asia
Times. Archived from the original (http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HA31Ak01.ht
ml) on 5 January 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2014. "political-science professors... Jack
Mansfield and Ed Snyder distinguish between 'mature democracies', which never, never
start wars ('hardly ever', as the captain of the Pinafore sang), and 'emerging democracies',
which start them all the time, in fact far more frequently than do dictatorships"
6. Robert Ian Anderson, "Is Flew's No True Scotsman Fallacy a True Fallacy? A Contextual
Analysis", P. Brézillon et al. (eds.): CONTEXT 2017, LNAI 10257, pp. 243–253, 2017.
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57837-8_19 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-319-57837-8_19)
7. Pinker, Steven (2021). Rationality, What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters. New
York: Viking. p. 88. ISBN 978-0525561996. OCLC 1237806678 (https://www.worldcat.org/ocl
c/1237806678).

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=No_true_Scotsman&oldid=1219241036"

You might also like